Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Info page]

PROPOSED STANDARD
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                          A. YeginRequest for Comments: 6786                                       SamsungCategory: Standards Track                                      R. CragieISSN: 2070-1721                                           Gridmerge Ltd.                                                           November 2012Encrypting the Protocol for Carrying Authentication forNetwork Access (PANA) Attribute-Value PairsAbstract   This document specifies a mechanism for delivering the Protocol for   Carrying Authentication for Network Access (PANA) Attribute-Value   Pairs (AVPs) in encrypted form.Status of This Memo   This is an Internet Standards Track document.   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force   (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has   received public review and has been approved for publication by the   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on   Internet Standards is available inSection 2 of RFC 5741.   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained athttp://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6786.Copyright Notice   Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the   document authors.  All rights reserved.   This document is subject toBCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of   publication of this document.  Please review these documents   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as   described in the Simplified BSD License.Yegin & Cragie               Standards Track                    [Page 1]

RFC 6786                   PANA AVP Encryption             November 2012Table of Contents1. Introduction ....................................................21.1. Specification of Requirements ..............................22. Details .........................................................33. Encryption Keys .................................................34. Encryption-Algorithm AVP ........................................44.1. AES128_CTR Encryption Algorithm ............................55. Encryption-Encap AVP ............................................66. Encryption Policy ...............................................66.1. Encryption Policy Specification ............................77. Security Considerations .........................................87.1. AES-CTR Security Considerations ............................98. IANA Considerations .............................................98.1. PANA AVP Codes .............................................98.2. PANA Encryption-Algorithm AVP Values .......................98.3. PANA AVP Codes Encryption Policy ..........................109. Acknowledgments ................................................1010. Normative References ..........................................101.  Introduction   PANA [RFC5191] is a UDP-based protocol to perform an Extensible   Authentication Protocol (EAP) authentication between a PANA Client   (PaC) and a PANA Authentication Agent (PAA).   Various types of payload are exchanged as part of the network access   authentication and authorization.  These payloads are carried in PANA   Attribute-Value Pairs (AVPs).  AVPs can be integrity protected using   the AUTH AVP when EAP authentication generates cryptographic keying   material.  AVPs are transmitted in the clear (i.e., not encrypted).   Certain payload types need to be delivered privately (e.g., network   keys, private identifiers, etc.).  This document defines a mechanism   for applying encryption to selected AVPs.1.1.  Specification of Requirements   In this document, several words are used to signify the requirements   of the specification.  These words are often capitalized.  The key   words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD",   "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document   are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].Yegin & Cragie               Standards Track                    [Page 2]

RFC 6786                   PANA AVP Encryption             November 20122.  Details   This document extends the AVP set defined inSection 8 of [RFC5191]   by defining two new AVPs: the Encryption-Algorithm AVP (seeSection4) and the Encryption-Encap AVP (seeSection 5).  Two new encryption   keys, PANA_PAC_ENCR_KEY and PANA_PAA_ENCR_KEY, are defined to encrypt   AVPs from the PaC to the PAA and AVPs from the PAA to the PaC,   respectively (seeSection 3).   When encryption is needed, the required algorithm is negotiated as   follows: the PAA SHALL send the initial PANA-Auth-Request carrying   one or more Encryption-Algorithm AVPs supported by it.  The PaC SHALL   select one of the algorithms from this AVP, and it SHALL respond with   the initial PANA-Auth-Answer carrying one Encryption-Algorithm AVP   for the selected algorithm.  Once PANA_PAC_ENCR_KEY and   PANA_PAA_ENCR_KEY have been generated, a PANA message MAY contain an   Encryption-Encap AVP.3.  Encryption Keys   PANA_PAC_ENCR_KEY is used for encrypting the AVP payload of the   Encryption-Encap AVP sent in a PANA message from the PaC to the PAA.   PANA_PAC_ENCR_KEY SHALL be computed according to the following   formula:   PANA_PAC_ENCR_KEY = prf+(MSK, "IETF PANA PaC Encr" | I_PAR |                         I_PAN | PaC_nonce | PAA_nonce | Key_ID)   PANA_PAA_ENCR_KEY is used for encrypting the AVP payload of the   Encryption-Encap AVP sent in a PANA message from the PAA to the PaC.   PANA_PAA_ENCR_KEY SHALL be computed according to the following   formula:   PANA_PAA_ENCR_KEY = prf+(MSK, "IETF PANA PAA Encr" | I_PAR |                         I_PAN | PaC_nonce | PAA_nonce | Key_ID)   In both cases:      -  The prf+ function is defined in the Internet Key Exchange         Protocol version 2 (IKEv2) [RFC5996].      -  The pseudo-random function (PRF) to be used for the prf+         function SHALL be negotiated using the PRF-Algorithm AVP in the         initial PANA-Auth-Request and PANA-Auth-Answer exchange with         the 'S' (Start) bit set as described inSection 4.1 of         [RFC5191].Yegin & Cragie               Standards Track                    [Page 3]

RFC 6786                   PANA AVP Encryption             November 2012      -  MSK is the master session key (MSK) generated by the EAP method         [RFC3748].  PANA_PAC_ENCR_KEY and PANA_PAA_ENCR_KEY MUST be         recalculated whenever a new MSK is generated by the EAP method.      -  "IETF PANA PaC Encr" and "IETF PANA PAA Encr" are the ASCII         code representations of the respective non-NULL terminated         strings (excluding the double quotes around them).      -  I_PAR and I_PAN are the initial PANA-Auth-Request and         PANA-Auth-Answer messages (the PANA header and the following         PANA AVPs) with the 'S' (Start) bit set, respectively.      -  PaC_nonce and PAA_nonce are values of the Nonce AVP carried in         the first non-initial PANA-Auth-Answer and PANA-Auth-Request         messages in the authentication and authorization phase or the         first PANA-Auth-Answer and PANA-Auth-Request messages in the         re-authentication phase, respectively.      -  Key_ID is the value of the Key-Id AVP.   The length of PANA_PAC_ENCR_KEY and PANA_PAA_ENCR_KEY depends on the   encryption algorithm in use.4.  Encryption-Algorithm AVP   The Encryption-Algorithm AVP (AVP code 13) is used for conveying the   encryption algorithm to be used with the Encryption-Encap AVP.  The   AVP value data is of type Unsigned32.   Only one encryption algorithm identifier AES128_CTR (code 1) is   identified by this document.  Encryption algorithm identifier values   other than 1 are reserved for future use.  Future specifications are   allowed to extend this list.      AES128_CTR: 1   In the absence of an application profile specifying otherwise, all   implementations SHALL support AES128_CTR.Yegin & Cragie               Standards Track                    [Page 4]

RFC 6786                   PANA AVP Encryption             November 20124.1.  AES128_CTR Encryption Algorithm   The AES128_CTR encryption algorithm uses the AES-CTR (Counter) mode   of operation as specified in [NIST_SP800_38A] using the AES-128 block   cipher.  The formatting function and counter generation function, as   specified inAppendix A of [NIST_SP800_38C], are used with the   following parameters:         n = 12,         q = 3   The 12-octet nonce consists of a 4-octet Key-Id, a 4-octet Session   ID, and a 4-octet Sequence Number in that order where each 4-octet   value is encoded in network byte order.  The Session ID and Sequence   Number values SHALL be the same as those in the PANA message carrying   the key Encryption-Encap AVP.  The Key-Id value SHALL be the same as   the one used for deriving PANA_PAC_ENCR_KEY and PANA_PAA_ENCR_KEY.   The output blocks of the encryption processing are encoded as   OctetString data in the Value field of a Encryption-Encap AVP.   Note that the first counter block used for encryption is Ctr_1, where   "_1" denotes "subscript 1" as described inAppendix A.3 of   [NIST_SP800_38C].  For example, given the following:         Key-Id = 0x55667788,         Session ID = 0xaabbccdd,         Sequence Number = 0x11223344   The first counter block used for encryption will be:         0x0255667788aabbccdd11223344000001   where the initial 0x02 represents the Flags field of the counter   block.   The nonce meets the requirement of uniqueness-per-key usage provided   that the sequence number does not wrap.  Therefore, for the purpose   of generating new keys:      -  If Encryption-Encap AVPs are being sent from the PaC to the PAA         and the sequence number is about to wrap, the PaC SHALL         initiate PANA re-authentication as described inSection 4.3 of         [RFC5191].      -  If Encryption-Encap AVPs are being sent from the PAA to the PaC         and the sequence number is about to wrap, the PAA SHALL         initiate PANA re-authentication as described inSection 4.3 of         [RFC5191].Yegin & Cragie               Standards Track                    [Page 5]

RFC 6786                   PANA AVP Encryption             November 2012   Re-authentication ensures the generation of a new MSK [RFC3748] and   thus a new PANA_PAC_ENCR_KEY and PANA_PAA_ENCR_KEY.5.  Encryption-Encap AVP   The Encryption-Encap AVP (AVP code 12) is used to encrypt one or more   PANA AVPs.  The format of the Encryption-Encap AVP depends on the   negotiated encryption algorithm.   When the negotiated encryption algorithm identifier is AES128_CTR   (code 1), AVP data payload is occupied by the encrypted AVPs.   There SHALL be only one Encryption-Encap AVP in a PANA message.  All   AVPs that require encryption SHALL be encapsulated within the   Encryption-Encap AVP.   The Encryption-Encap AVP uses either PANA_PAC_ENCR_KEY or   PANA_PAA_ENCR_KEY, and the encryption algorithm negotiated by the   Encryption-Algorithm AVP.  The Encryption-Encap AVP SHALL only be   used if the EAP method generates cryptographic keys (specifically,   the MSK [RFC3748]).   The Encryption-Encap AVP MAY be used in a PANA message from the PaC   to the PAA when the encryption algorithm has been successfully   negotiated and once PANA_PAC_ENCR_KEY has been generated.   The Encryption-Encap AVP MAY be used in a PANA message from the PAA   to the PaC when the encryption algorithm has been successfully   negotiated and once PANA_PAA_ENCR_KEY has been generated.   The Encryption-Encap AVP MAY be used in the very first PANA message   carrying the Result-Code AVP set to PANA_Success value and any   subsequent message within the same PANA session.6.  Encryption Policy   The specification of any AVP SHOULD state that the AVP either shall   or shall not be encrypted using the Encryption-Encap AVP.  The   specification of an AVP MAY state that the AVP may (or may not) be   encrypted using the Encryption-Encap AVP.  The specification SHOULD   use a table in the format specified inSection 6.1.  If the   specification of an AVP is silent about whether the AVP shall or   shall not be encrypted using the Encryption-Encap AVP, this implies   that the AVP MAY be encrypted using the Encryption-Encap AVP.Yegin & Cragie               Standards Track                    [Page 6]

RFC 6786                   PANA AVP Encryption             November 20126.1.  Encryption Policy Specification   This section defines a table format for the specification of whether   an AVP shall or shall not be encrypted using the Encryption-Encap   AVP.   The table uses the following symbols:   Y: The AVP SHALL be encrypted using the Encryption-Encap AVP.  If the      AVP is encountered not encrypted using the Encryption-Encap AVP,      it SHALL be considered invalid and the message containing the AVP      SHALL be discarded.   N: The AVP SHALL NOT be encrypted using the Encryption-Encap AVP.  If      the AVP is encountered encrypted using the Encryption-Encap AVP,      it SHALL be considered invalid and the message containing the AVP      SHALL be discarded.   X: The AVP MAY be encrypted using the Encryption-Encap AVP.  If the      AVP is encountered either encrypted or not encrypted using the      Encryption-Encap AVP, it SHALL be considered valid.   The legitimate occurrence of unencrypted AVPs and AVPs after   decryption and unencapsulation SHALL be subject to the AVP Occurrence   Table (Figure 4 in [RFC5191]).   The following table shows the encryption requirements for the   existing AVPs defined in [RFC5191]:            Attribute Name        |Enc|            ----------------------+---+            AUTH                  | N |            EAP-Payload           | X |            Integrity-Algorithm   | N |            Key-Id                | N |            Nonce                 | N |            PRF-Algorithm         | N |            Result-Code           | N |            Session-Lifetime      | X |            Termination-Cause     | X |            ----------------------+---+Yegin & Cragie               Standards Track                    [Page 7]

RFC 6786                   PANA AVP Encryption             November 2012   The following table shows the encryption requirements for the AVPs   defined in [RFC6345]:            Attribute Name        |Enc|            ----------------------+---+            PaC-Information       | N |            Relayed-Message       | N |            ----------------------+---+   The following table shows the encryption requirements for the AVPs   defined in this document:            Attribute Name        |Enc|            ----------------------+---+            Encryption-Algorithm  | N |            Encryption-Encap      | N |            ----------------------+---+   The following table is an example showing the encryption requirements   for a newly defined AVP, Example-AVP:            Attribute Name        |Enc|            ----------------------+---+            Example-AVP           | Y |            ----------------------+---+   The guidance for specifying the encryption requirements for a newly   defined AVP is as follows:   Y: If the payload needs privacy against eavesdroppers (e.g., carrying      a secret key).   N: If the payload may need to be observed by on-path network elements      (i.e., subject to deep packet inspection).   X: If neither concern applies.7.  Security Considerations   PANA_PAC_ENCR_KEY and PANA_PAA_ENCR_KEY are secret keys shared   between the PaC and the PAA.  They SHALL NOT be used for purposes   other than those specified in this document.  Compromise of these   keys would lead to compromise of the secret information protected by   these keys.Yegin & Cragie               Standards Track                    [Page 8]

RFC 6786                   PANA AVP Encryption             November 20127.1.  AES-CTR Security Considerations   The use of AES-CTR encryption has its own security considerations,   which are detailed in the Security Considerations section of   [RFC3686].  Specifically:      -  The nonce specified inSection 4.1 meets the requirement of         uniqueness-per-key usage.      -Section 4.1 of [RFC5191] states that if the EAP method         generates cryptographic keys, an AUTH AVP will always be         present in every PANA message after key generation.  Therefore,         an Encryption-Encap AVP will always be sent in conjunction with         an AUTH AVP.  This meets the requirement of a companion         authentication function.8.  IANA Considerations   As described in Sections4 and5, and following the IANA allocation   policy on PANA messages [RFC5872], two PANA AVP codes and one set of   AVP values have been registered.  An additional encryption policy for   AVP codes has also been registered.8.1.  PANA AVP Codes   The following AVP codes have been registered in the "AVP Codes" sub-   registry of the "Protocol for Carrying Authentication for Network   Access (PANA) Parameters" registry:   o  A standard AVP code of 12 for the Encryption-Encap AVP.   o  A standard AVP code of 13 for the Encryption-Algorithm AVP.8.2.  PANA Encryption-Algorithm AVP Values   The following AVP values representing the encryption algorithm   identifier for the Encryption-Algorithm AVP code have been assigned   in the "Encryption-Algorithm (AVP Code 13) AVP Values" sub-registry   under the "Protocol for Carrying Authentication for Network Access   (PANA) Parameters" registry":   o  An AVP value of 1 for AES128_CTR.   o  All other AVP values (0, 2-4294967295) are unassigned.   The registration procedures are IETF Review or IESG Approval in   accordance with [RFC5872].Yegin & Cragie               Standards Track                    [Page 9]

RFC 6786                   PANA AVP Encryption             November 20128.3.  PANA AVP Codes Encryption Policy   The additional encryption policy defined inSection 6.1 has been   added as a column labeled "Enc" in the "AVP Codes" sub-registry and   has been applied to all existing AVP codes and those defined in this   specification.9.  Acknowledgments   The authors would like to thank Yoshihiro Ohba, Yasuyuki Tanaka,   Adrian Farrel, Brian Carpenter, Yaron Sheffer, Ralph Droms, Stephen   Farrell, Barry Leiba, and Sean Turner for their valuable comments.10.  Normative References   [NIST_SP800_38A]              Dworkin, M., "Recommendation for Block Cipher Modes of              Operation: Methods and Techniques", December 2001.   [NIST_SP800_38C]              Dworkin, M., "Recommendation for Block Cipher Modes of              Operation: The CCM Mode for Authentication and              Confidentiality", May 2004.   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate              Requirement Levels",BCP 14,RFC 2119, March 1997.   [RFC3686]  Housley, R., "Using Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)              Counter Mode With IPsec Encapsulating Security Payload              (ESP)",RFC 3686, January 2004.   [RFC3748]  Aboba, B., Blunk, L., Vollbrecht, J., Carlson, J., and H.              Levkowetz, Ed., "Extensible Authentication Protocol              (EAP)",RFC 3748, June 2004.   [RFC5191]  Forsberg, D., Ohba, Y., Ed., Patil, B., Tschofenig, H.,              and A. Yegin, "Protocol for Carrying Authentication for              Network Access (PANA)",RFC 5191, May 2008.   [RFC5872]  Arkko, J. and A. Yegin, "IANA Rules for the Protocol for              Carrying Authentication for Network Access (PANA)",RFC5872, May 2010.   [RFC5996]  Kaufman, C., Hoffman, P., Nir, Y., and P. Eronen,              "Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2)",RFC5996, September 2010.Yegin & Cragie               Standards Track                   [Page 10]

RFC 6786                   PANA AVP Encryption             November 2012   [RFC6345]  Duffy, P., Chakrabarti, S., Cragie, R., Ohba, Y., Ed., and              A. Yegin, "Protocol for Carrying Authentication for              Network Access (PANA) Relay Element",RFC 6345, August              2011.Authors' Addresses   Alper Yegin   Samsung   Istanbul   Turkey   EMail: alper.yegin@yegin.org   Robert Cragie   Gridmerge Ltd.   89 Greenfield Crescent   Wakefield, WF4 4WA   United Kingdom   EMail: robert.cragie@gridmerge.comYegin & Cragie               Standards Track                   [Page 11]

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp