Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Info page]

PROPOSED STANDARD
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                           F. GontRequest for Comments: 6633                        UTN-FRH / SI6 NetworksUpdates:792,1122,1812                                        May 2012Category: Standards TrackISSN: 2070-1721Deprecation of ICMP Source Quench MessagesAbstract   This document formally deprecates the use of ICMP Source Quench   messages by transport protocols, formally updatingRFC 792,RFC 1122,   andRFC 1812.Status of This Memo   This is an Internet Standards Track document.   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force   (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has   received public review and has been approved for publication by the   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on   Internet Standards is available inSection 2 of RFC 5741.   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained athttp://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6633.Copyright Notice   Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the   document authors.  All rights reserved.   This document is subject toBCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of   publication of this document.  Please review these documents   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as   described in the Simplified BSD License.Gont                         Standards Track                    [Page 1]

RFC 6633            Deprecation of ICMP Source Quench           May 2012Table of Contents1. Introduction ....................................................22. ICMP Source Quench Messages .....................................33. UpdatingRFC 1122 ...............................................34. UpdatingRFC 1812 ...............................................45. Clarification for UDP, SCTP, and DCCP ...........................46. General Advice to Transport Protocols ...........................47. Recommendation RegardingRFC 1016 ...............................58. Security Considerations .........................................59. IANA Considerations .............................................510. Acknowledgements ...............................................511. References .....................................................611.1. Normative References ......................................611.2. Informative References ....................................7Appendix A.  Survey of Support of ICMP Source Quench in Some                Popular TCP/IP Implementations ........................81.  Introduction   The ICMP specification [RFC0792] defined the ICMP Source Quench   message (type 4, code 0), which was meant as a mechanism for   congestion control.  ICMP Source Quench has been known to be an   ineffective (and unfair) antidote for congestion, and generation of   ICMP Source Quench messages by routers has been formally deprecated   by [RFC1812] since 1995.  However, reaction to ICMP Source Quench   messages in transport protocols has never been formally deprecated.   This document formally deprecates reaction to ICMP Source Quench   messages by transport protocols such as TCP [RFC0793], formally   updating [RFC0792], [RFC1122], and [RFC1812].  Additionally, it   provides a recommendation against the implementation of [RFC1016].   The rationale for these specification updates is as follows:   o  Processing of ICMP Source Quench messages by routers has been      deprecated for nearly 17 years [RFC1812].   o  Virtually all popular host implementations have removed support      for ICMP Source Quench messages since (at least) 2005 [RFC5927].   o  Widespread deployment of ICMP filtering makes it impossible to      rely on ICMP Source Quench messages for congestion control.   o  The IETF has moved away from ICMP Source Quench messages for      congestion control (e.g., note the development of Explicit      Congestion Notification (ECN) [RFC3168] and the fact that ICMPv6      [RFC4443] does not even specify a Source Quench message).Gont                         Standards Track                    [Page 2]

RFC 6633            Deprecation of ICMP Source Quench           May 2012         ICMP Source Quench messages are not normally seen in the         deployed Internet and were considered rare at least as far back         as 1994 [Floyd1994].   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].2.  ICMP Source Quench Messages   The ICMP specification [RFC0792] defined the ICMP Source Quench   message (type 4, code 0), which was meant to provide a mechanism for   congestion control.  The Host Requirements RFC [RFC1122] stated inSection 4.2.3.9 that hosts MUST react to ICMP Source Quench messages   by slowing transmission on the connection, and further added that the   RECOMMENDED procedure was to put the corresponding connection in the   slow-start phase of TCP's congestion control algorithm [RFC5681].   [RFC1812] noted that research suggested that ICMP Source Quench was   an ineffective (and unfair) antidote for congestion, and formally   deprecated the generation of ICMP Source Quench messages by routers,   stating that routers SHOULD NOT send ICMP Source Quench messages in   response to congestion.   [RFC5927] discussed the use of ICMP Source Quench messages for   performing "blind throughput-reduction" attacks, and noted that most   TCP implementations silently ignore ICMP Source Quench messages.   We note that TCP implements its own congestion control mechanisms   [RFC5681] [RFC3168], which do not depend on ICMP Source Quench   messages.      It is interesting to note that ICMPv6 [RFC4443] does not specify a      Source Quench message.3.  UpdatingRFC 1122   This document hereby updatesSection 3.2.2.3 of [RFC1122] as follows:      A host MUST NOT send ICMP Source Quench messages.      If a Source Quench message is received, the IP layer MAY silently      discard it.Section 4.2.3.9 of [RFC1122] is updated as follows:      TCP MUST silently discard any received ICMP Source Quench      messages.Gont                         Standards Track                    [Page 3]

RFC 6633            Deprecation of ICMP Source Quench           May 2012   The consensus of the TSV WG was that there are no valid reasons for a   host to generate or react to an ICMP Source Quench message in the   current Internet.  The recommendation that a sender "MUST NOT" send   an ICMP Source Quench message is because there is no known valid   reason for a host to generate this message.  The only known impact of   a sender ignoring this requirement is that it may necessarily consume   network and endpoint resources.  Discarding ICMP Source Quench   messages at the Internet layer (rather than at the transport layer)   is a performance optimization that is permitted by this update.4.  UpdatingRFC 1812   This document hereby updatesSection 4.3.3.3 of [RFC1812] as follows:      A router MUST ignore any ICMP Source Quench messages it receives.   The consensus of the TSV WG was that there are no valid reasons for a   router to react to ICMP Source Quench messages in the current   Internet.5.  Clarification for UDP, SCTP, and DCCP   UDP [RFC0768] did not explicitly specify support for ICMP Source   Quench messages.  Hereby, we clarify that UDP endpoints MUST silently   discard received ICMP Source Quench messages.   It is understood that SCTP [RFC4960] and DCCP [RFC4340] did not   specify support for processing received ICMP Source Quench messages.   Hereby, we clarify that DCCP and SCTP endpoints MUST silently discard   received ICMP Source Quench messages.6.  General Advice to Transport Protocols   If a Source Quench message is received by any other transport-   protocol instance, it MUST be silently ignored.   The TSV WG is not aware of any mechanism that requires processing of   these messages and therefore expects other transports to follow the   recommendations inSection 3.  Note that since generation of ICMP   Source Quench messages has been deprecated for many years, and since   this document additionally deprecates reaction to ICMP Source Quench   messages by IETF-specified transports, future applications cannot   expect to receive these messages.Gont                         Standards Track                    [Page 4]

RFC 6633            Deprecation of ICMP Source Quench           May 20127.  Recommendation RegardingRFC 1016   [RFC1016] describes an experimental approach to the handling of ICMP   Source Quench messages in hosts that was considered in 1987.  Even   thoughRFC 1016 has never been on the IETF Standards Track, for   clarity and avoidance of doubt we note that the approach described in   [RFC1016] MUST NOT be implemented.8.  Security Considerations   ICMP Source Quench messages could be leveraged for performing blind   throughput-reduction attacks against TCP and similar protocols.  This   attack vector, along with possible countermeasures, has been   discussed in great detail in [RFC5927] and [CPNI-TCP].  Silently   ignoring ICMP Source Quench messages, as specified in this document,   eliminates the aforementioned attack vector.   For current TCP implementations, receipt of an ICMP Source Quench   message should not result in security issues because, as noted in   [RFC5927] and [CPNI-TCP], virtually all current versions of popular   TCP implementations already silently ignore ICMP Source Quench   messages.  This is also the case for SCTP and DCCP implementations.   Hosts, security gateways, and firewalls MUST silently discard   received ICMP Source Quench packets and SHOULD log such drops as a   security fault with at least minimal details (IP Source Address, IP   Destination Address, ICMP message type, and date/time the packet was   seen).      We note that security devices such as the Snort Network Intrusion      Detection System (NIDS) have logged ICMP Source Quench messages as      such for more than ten years [Anderson2002].9.  IANA Considerations   IANA has marked ICMP type 4 (Source Quench) as "Deprecated" in the   ICMP Parameters registry [ICMPPARREG] with a reference to this   document.10.  Acknowledgements   The author of this document would like to thank Ran Atkinson, who   contributed text that was incorporated into this document and also   provided valuable feedback on earlier versions of this document.   The author of this document would like to thank (in alphabetical   order) Fred Baker, David Black, Scott Bradner, James Carlson, Antonio   De Simone, Wesley Eddy, Gorry Fairhurst, Alfred Hoenes, MaheshGont                         Standards Track                    [Page 5]

RFC 6633            Deprecation of ICMP Source Quench           May 2012   Jethanandani, Kathleen Moriarty, Carlos Pignataro, James Polk,   Anantha Ramaiah, Randall Stewart, Dan Wing, and Andrew Yourtchenko,   for providing valuable feedback on earlier versions of this document.   This document has also benefited from discussions within the TCPM   Working Group while working on [RFC5927].   Fernando Gont wishes to thank Jorge Oscar Gont, Nelida Garcia, and   Guillermo Gont for their love and support.   Fernando Gont's attendance to IETF meetings was supported by ISOC's   "Fellowship to the IETF" program.11.  References11.1.  Normative References   [RFC0768]       Postel, J., "User Datagram Protocol", STD 6,RFC 768,                   August 1980.   [RFC0792]       Postel, J., "Internet Control Message Protocol",                   STD 5,RFC 792, September 1981.   [RFC0793]       Postel, J., "Transmission Control Protocol", STD 7,RFC 793, September 1981.   [RFC1122]       Braden, R., "Requirements for Internet Hosts -                   Communication Layers", STD 3,RFC 1122, October 1989.   [RFC1812]       Baker, F., "Requirements for IP Version 4 Routers",RFC 1812, June 1995.   [RFC2119]       Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate                   Requirement Levels",BCP 14,RFC 2119, March 1997.   [RFC4340]       Kohler, E., Handley, M., and S. Floyd, "Datagram                   Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP)",RFC 4340,                   March 2006.   [RFC4960]       Stewart, R., "Stream Control Transmission Protocol",RFC 4960, September 2007.   [RFC5681]       Allman, M., Paxson, V., and E. Blanton, "TCP                   Congestion Control",RFC 5681, September 2009.Gont                         Standards Track                    [Page 6]

RFC 6633            Deprecation of ICMP Source Quench           May 201211.2.  Informative References   [Anderson2002]  Anderson, D., Fong, M., and A. Valdes, "Heterogeneous                   Sensor Correlation: A Case Study of Live Traffic                   Analysis", Proceedings of the 3rd Annual IEEE                   Information Assurance Workshop New York, NY, USA,                   2002.   [CPNI-TCP]      CPNI, "Security Assessment of the Transmission                   Control Protocol (TCP)", 2009,                   <http://www.gont.com.ar/papers/tn-03-09-security-assessment-TCP.pdf>.   [Floyd1994]     Floyd, S., "TCP and Explicit Congestion                   Notification", ACM CCR New York, NY, Volume 24,                   Issue 5, October 1994.   [FreeBSD]       The FreeBSD Project, <http://www.freebsd.org>.   [ICMPPARREG]    IANA, "Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP)                   Parameters",                   <http://www.iana.org/assignments/icmp-parameters>.   [Linux]         The Linux Project, <http://www.kernel.org>.   [NetBSD]        The NetBSD Project, <http://www.netbsd.org>.   [OpenBSD]       The OpenBSD Project, <http://www.openbsd.org>.   [OpenSolaris]   OpenSolaris, <http://www.opensolaris.org>.   [RFC1016]       Prue, W. and J. Postel, "Something a host could do                   with source quench: The Source Quench Introduced                   Delay (SQuID)",RFC 1016, July 1987.   [RFC3168]       Ramakrishnan, K., Floyd, S., and D. Black, "The                   Addition of Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) to                   IP",RFC 3168, September 2001.   [RFC4443]       Conta, A., Deering, S., and M. Gupta, "Internet                   Control Message Protocol (ICMPv6) for the Internet                   Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Specification",RFC 4443,                   March 2006.   [RFC5927]       Gont, F., "ICMP Attacks against TCP",RFC 5927,                   July 2010.Gont                         Standards Track                    [Page 7]

RFC 6633            Deprecation of ICMP Source Quench           May 2012Appendix A.  Survey of Support of ICMP Source Quench in Some Popular             TCP/IP Implementations   A large number of implementations completely ignore ICMP Source   Quench messages meant for TCP connections.  This behavior has been   implemented in, at least, Linux [Linux] since 2004, and in FreeBSD   [FreeBSD], NetBSD [NetBSD], OpenBSD [OpenBSD], and Solaris 10 since   2005.  Additionally, OpenSolaris [OpenSolaris] has always shipped   with support for ICMP Source Quench messages disabled.Author's Address   Fernando Gont   UTN-FRH / SI6 Networks   Evaristo Carriego 2644   Haedo, Provincia de Buenos Aires  1706   Argentina   Phone: +54 11 4650 8472   EMail: fgont@si6networks.com   URI:http://www.si6networks.comGont                         Standards Track                    [Page 8]

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp