Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Errata] [Info page]

PROPOSED STANDARD
Errata Exist
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                          R. DromsRequest for Comments: 6276                                    P. ThubertCategory: Standards Track                                          CiscoISSN: 2070-1721                                                F. Dupont                                             Internet Systems Consortium                                                               W. Haddad                                                                Ericsson                                                            C. Bernardos                                                                    UC3M                                                               July 2011DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for Network Mobility (NEMO)Abstract   One aspect of network mobility support is the assignment of a prefix   or prefixes to a mobile router for use on the links in the mobile   network.  This document specifies how DHCPv6 prefix delegation can be   used for this configuration task.  The mobile router plays the role   of requesting router, while the home agent assumes the role of   delegating router.  When the mobile router is outside its home   network, the mobile router also assumes the role of DHCPv6 relay   agent, co-located with the requesting router function.Status of This Memo   This is an Internet Standards Track document.   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force   (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has   received public review and has been approved for publication by the   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on   Internet Standards is available inSection 2 of RFC 5741.   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained athttp://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6276.Copyright Notice   Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the   document authors.  All rights reserved.   This document is subject toBCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of   publication of this document.  Please review these documentsDroms, et al.                Standards Track                    [Page 1]

RFC 6276            DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO          July 2011   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as   described in the Simplified BSD License.Table of Contents1.  Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .22.  Terminology  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .33.  DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation of Mobile Network Prefixes  . . . . .4     3.1.  Exchanging DHCPv6 Messages When the Mobile Router Is           Not at Home  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .53.1.1.  Relay Agent Configuration  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .73.1.2.  Transmission of DHCPv6 Messages  . . . . . . . . . . .83.1.3.  Receipt of DHCPv6 Messages . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8     3.2.  Exchanging DHCPv6 Messages When the Mobile Router Is           at Home  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .83.3.  Selecting a Home Agent That Provides DHCPv6PD  . . . . . .93.4.  Minimizing DHCPv6PD Messages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .103.5.  Other DHCPv6 Functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .104.  Security Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .105.  Acknowledgments  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .126.  References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .126.1.  Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .126.2.  Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .131.  Introduction   One aspect of network mobility support is the assignment of a prefix   or prefixes to a mobile router for use on the links in Network   Mobility (NEMO).  DHCPv6 prefix delegation (DHCPv6PD) [RFC3633] can   be used for this configuration task.   The model of operation of DHCPv6PD for prefix delegation is as   follows [RFC3633].  A delegating router is provided IPv6 prefixes to   be delegated to requesting routers.  A requesting router requests   prefix(es) from the delegating router.  The delegating router chooses   prefix(es) for delegation, and responds with prefix(es) to the   requesting router.  The requesting router is then responsible for the   delegated prefix(es).  Note that DHCPv6 options for prefix delegation   defined in [RFC3633] have been defined for general use across   routers, and not only for mobile routers running the NEMO Basic   Support protocol [RFC3963].   To use DHCPv6PD as a prefix assignment mechanism in mobile networks,   when the mobile router is located at home, the home agent assumes the   role of the delegating router and the mobile router assumes the roleDroms, et al.                Standards Track                    [Page 2]

RFC 6276            DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO          July 2011   of the requesting router.  However, when the mobile router is away   from home, in addition to the roles when the mobile router is located   at home, the mobile router also assumes the role of a DHCPv6 relay   agent co-located with the requesting router function.   The DHCPv6PD server running at the home agent is provisioned with   prefixes to be assigned using any of the prefix assignment mechanisms   described in the DHCPv6PD specification [RFC3633].2.  Terminology   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this   document are to be interpreted as described inRFC 2119 [RFC2119].   The following terms used in this document are defined in the IPv6   Addressing Architecture document [RFC4291]:      Link-Local Unicast address      Link-Local Scope Multicast address   The following terms used in this document are defined in the Mobile   IPv6 specification [RFC6275]:      Home Agent (HA)      Home Link      Home Address (HoA)      Care-of Address (CoA)      Binding Update (BU)      Binding Acknowledgement (BA)   The following terms used in this document are defined in the Mobile   Network terminology document [RFC4885]:      Mobile Router (MR)      Mobile Network (NEMO)      Mobile Network Prefix (MNP)Droms, et al.                Standards Track                    [Page 3]

RFC 6276            DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO          July 2011   The following terms used in this document are defined in the DHCPv6   [RFC3315] and DHCPv6 prefix delegation [RFC3633] specifications:      Delegating Router (DR; acts as a DHCPv6 server)      Requesting Router (RR; acts as a DHCPv6 client)      DHCPv6 Relay Agent (DRA)   The following acronym is used in this document:      DHCPv6PD: DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation3.  DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation of Mobile Network Prefixes   The NEMO Basic Support protocol [RFC3963] extends the Mobile IPv6   protocol [RFC6275] to enable network mobility.  With the NEMO Basic   Support protocol, a mobile router uses Mobile IPv6 to establish and   maintain a session with its home agent and uses bidirectional   tunneling between the mobile router and the home agent to provide a   path through which nodes attached to links in the mobile network can   maintain connectivity with nodes not in the NEMO.   The requirements for Network Mobility [RFC4885] include the ability   of the mobile router to receive delegated prefixes that can then be   assigned to links in the mobile network.  DHCPv6PD can be used to   meet this requirement for prefix delegation.   To use DHCPv6PD for mobile networks, when the mobile router is   located at home, the home agent assumes the role of the delegating   router and the mobile router assumes the role of the requesting   router.  However, when the mobile router is away from home, in   addition to the roles when the mobile router is located at home, the   mobile router also assumes the role of a DHCPv6 relay agent   co-located with the requesting router function.   When the mobile router is not at home, the home agent and the mobile   router exchange DHCPv6PD protocol messages as specified in [RFC6275].   This means that the messages sent by the mobile router MUST include   the Home Address destination option and messages sent by the home   agent MUST make use of a Routing Header type 2.  See Figure 1 for the   deployment topologies when the MR is at home and when it is visiting   a foreign network.Droms, et al.                Standards Track                    [Page 4]

RFC 6276            DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO          July 2011                  ------                ------                  | MR |----------------| HA |                  |(RR)| (home network) |(DR)|                  ------                ------              -------    /-----------\     ------              | MR  |----|  Internet |-----| HA |              |(RR) |    \-----------/     |(DR)|              |(DRA)|                      ------              -------         (visited network)   Figure 1: Deployment topologies of the use of DHCPv6PD for delegation                        of Mobile Network Prefixes   The DHCPv6PD server is provisioned with prefixes to be assigned using   any of the prefix assignment mechanisms described in the DHCPv6PD   specifications.  Other updates to the home agent data structures   required as a side effect of prefix delegation are specified by the   particular network mobility protocol.  For example, in the case of   NEMO Basic Network Mobility Support [RFC3963], the HA would add an   entry in its binding cache registering the delegated prefix to the   mobile router to which the prefix was delegated.3.1.  Exchanging DHCPv6 Messages When the Mobile Router Is Not at Home   The case when the mobile router is away from home is described in   this section.Section 3.2 describes the protocol operation for the   case when the mobile router is attached to its home link.   The mobile router MUST register at the home agent (i.e., by sending a   Binding Update to the home agent) before initiating a DHCPv6 message   exchange for prefix delegation.  The mobile router MUST use implicit   BU signaling, since the mobile router may not have yet requested any   prefixes.   If the mobile router does not have any active delegated prefixes   (with unexpired leases), the mobile router MUST initiate a DHCPv6   message exchange with a DHCPv6 Solicit message as described inSection 17 of [RFC3315] andSection 11.1 of [RFC3633].  The   delegating router at the home agent responds with an Advertise   message.  Then, the mobile router MUST request a set of prefixes by   sending a Request message.  The delegating router includes the   delegated prefixes in a Reply message.  Note that in this case, the   mobile router has previously sent a Binding Update to the home agent   without knowing yet the set of prefixes that it can use as mobile   network prefixes.  The home agent, upon reception of the implicit   Binding Update from the mobile router, MUST select (in case this wasDroms, et al.                Standards Track                    [Page 5]

RFC 6276            DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO          July 2011   not pre-configured already) the prefixes that would then be delegated   to the mobile router via DHCPv6PD.  The home agent, once the DHCPv6   signaling has been completed, MUST add an entry in its binding cache   including the delegated prefixes.   In case the mobile router has one or more active delegated prefixes   -- for example, as if the mobile router reboots or the mobile network   prefix(es) currently used by the mobile router is about to expire --   the mobile router MUST initiate a DHCPv6 message exchange with a   DHCPv6 Rebind message as described inSection 18.1.2 of [RFC3315] andSection 12.1 of [RFC3633].   A DHPCv6 relay agent function [RFC3315] MUST be used at the mobile   router.  This relay agent function is co-located in the mobile router   with the DHCPv6 client function (see Figure 2).  The DHCPv6 signaling   between the mobile router and the home agent is exchanged between the   DHCPv6 relay agent in the mobile router and the DHCPv6 server on the   home agent.  DHCPv6 messages from the mobile router to the home agent   are unicast packets sent from the unicast home address of the mobile   router to the global unicast address of the home agent, and therefore   the Home Address destination option MUST be used.  DHCPv6 replies   from the home agent to the mobile router MUST be sent using the   Routing Header type 2, as specified in [RFC6275].  The DHCPv6 client   in the mobile router MUST hand any outbound DHCPv6 messages to the   co-located relay agent.  Responses from the DHCPv6 server are   delivered to the relay agent function in the mobile router, which   MUST extract the encapsulated message and deliver it to the DHCPv6   client in the mobile router.Droms, et al.                Standards Track                    [Page 6]

RFC 6276            DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO          July 2011     -----------------------------                  --------     |            MR             |                  |  HA  |     | (RR)                (DRA) |                  | (DR) |     ----------------------------                   --------         |                   |       Binding Update    |         |                   |------------------------>|         |                   |       (HoA, CoA)        |         |                   |                         |         |                   |       Binding Ack       |         |                   |<------------------------|         |                   |                         |         | DHCPv6 Solicit    |   DHCPv6 Solicit        |         |..................>|--=====================->|         |                   |                         |         |  DHCPv6 Advertise |       DHCPv6 Advertise  |         |<..................|<-=====================--|         |                   |                         |         | DHCPv6 Request    |       DHCPv6 Request    |         |..................>|--=====================->|         |                   |                         |         |      DHCPv6 Reply |       DHCPv6 Reply      |         |<..................|<-=====================--|         |                   | (Mobile Network Prefix) |         |                   |                         |    Figure 2: Signaling sequence when the mobile router is not at home   Note that a mobile router using DHCPv6PD to obtain the set of   prefixes to be used as mobile network prefixes cannot derive its home   address from one of its mobile network prefix(es) (as the mobile   router does not know them before registering to the home agent).   Therefore, the mobile router MUST assign its home address from the   prefix on its Home Link.3.1.1.  Relay Agent Configuration   The use of the relay agent function in the mobile router allows the   mobile router to unicast DHCPv6 messages to the DHCPv6 server.  The   relay agent MUST be configured with the address of the DHCPv6 server.   For the purposes of this specification, the relay agent assumes that   the home agent for the mobile router hosts the DHCPv6 server.   Therefore, the mobile router MUST configure the DHCPv6 relay agent to   forward DHCPv6 messages to the home agent.   The DHCPv6 specification supports in certain scenarios the use of   unicast between the client and the server.  However, its use presents   some difficulties, as the client has to first receive a Server   Unicast option (Section 22.12 of [RFC3315]) from the server, whichDroms, et al.                Standards Track                    [Page 7]

RFC 6276            DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO          July 2011   means that a Solicit/Advertise message exchange is required in   advance.  That signaling exchange would require the presence of a   relay agent on the mobile router, and therefore little gain would be   achieved in this case from the use of the Server Unicast option.3.1.2.  Transmission of DHCPv6 Messages   When the DHCPv6 client in the mobile router sends a message, it MUST   hand the message to the DHCPv6 relay agent in the mobile router.  The   way in which the message is passed to the DHCP relay agent is beyond   the scope of this document.  The relay agent encapsulates the message   from the client according to [RFC3315] in a Relay-forward message and   sends the resulting DHCPv6 message to the home agent.  The relay   agent sets the fields in the Relay-forward message as follows:   msg-type       RELAY-FORW   hop-count      1   link-address   The home address of the mobile router   peer-address   The home address of the mobile router   options        MUST include a "Relay Message option" [RFC3315]; MAY                  include other options added by the relay agent.3.1.3.  Receipt of DHCPv6 Messages   Messages from the DHCPv6 server will be returned to the DHCPv6 relay   agent, with the message for the DHCPv6 client encapsulated in the   Relay Message option [RFC3315] in a Relay-reply message.  The relay   agent function MUST extract the message for the client from the Relay   Message option and hand the message to the DHCPv6 client in the   mobile router.  The way in which the message is passed to the client   is beyond the scope of this document.3.2.  Exchanging DHCPv6 Messages When the Mobile Router Is at Home   When the mobile router is on its home link, the home agent MUST use   the home link to exchange DHCPv6PD messages with the mobile router   (Figure 3).  In this case, the DHCPv6 co-located relay function MUST   be disabled.  It is the responsibility of the implementation to   determine when the mobile router is on its home link.  The Home Link   Detection mechanism is described inSection 11.5.2 of [RFC6275].Droms, et al.                Standards Track                    [Page 8]

RFC 6276            DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO          July 2011                  --------                   --------                  |  MR  |                   |  HA  |                  | (RR) |                   | (DR) |                  --------                   --------                      |                         |                      |       DHCPv6 Solicit    |                      |------------------------>|                      |                         |                      |       DHCPv6 Advertise  |                      |<------------------------|                      |                         |                      |       DHCPv6 Request    |                      |------------------------>|                      |                         |                      |       DHCPv6 Reply      |                      |<------------------------|                      | (Mobile Network Prefix) |                      |                         |    Figure 3: Signaling sequence for the case the home agent is at home3.3.  Selecting a Home Agent That Provides DHCPv6PD   Not all nodes that are willing to act as a home agent are required to   provide DHCPv6PD.  Therefore, when selecting a home agent, a mobile   router that requires DHCPv6PD service MUST identify a home agent that   will provide the service.  The mobile router can determine if a home   agent provides DHCPv6PD by initiating a DHCPv6 message exchange   (i.e., sending a Solicit message) in which the mobile router requests   delegated prefix(es).  If the home agent does not respond or responds   but does not delegate any prefix(es) in its response, the mobile   router assumes that the home agent does not provide DHCPv6PD service.   The mobile router continues to query all candidate home agents until   it finds one that provides DHCPv6PD.  Note that in this particular   case and if the mobile router is away from home, the mobile router   has to have already performed a Mobile IPv6 registration with the   home agent it queries.   Querying a home agent to determine if it provides DHCPv6PD requires   different operational variables than those recommended by the DHCPv6   specification.  [RFC3315] recommends that under normal circumstances,   a host will continue to send DHCPv6 Solicit messages until it   receives a response (seeSection 17 of [RFC3315]), i.e., the Maximum   Retransmission Duration (MRD) and Maximum Retransmission Count (MRC)   are both set to zero.  However, a home agent may not respond to the   Solicit messages from the mobile router because the home agent does   not support DHCPv6 prefix delegation.  Therefore, when querying a   home agent to determine if the home agent provides DHCPv6PD service,Droms, et al.                Standards Track                    [Page 9]

RFC 6276            DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO          July 2011   it is RECOMMENDED that MRD and MRC be set to non-zero values so that   the mobile router discontinues sending Solicit messages to the home   agent after sending 6 Solicit messages, and conclude that the home   agent will not provide DHCPv6PD service.  Sending 6 queries provides   enough reliability for scenarios in which the wireless connectivity   is lost for a short period after sending the first Binding Update   message.   It is RECOMMENDED that the mobile router uses a sequential probing of   the home agents for DHCPv6PD service.3.4.  Minimizing DHCPv6PD Messages   The use DHCPv6PD in a mobile network can be combined with the Rapid   Commit option [RFC3315] to provide DHCPv6 prefix delegation with a   two-message exchange between the mobile router and the DHCPv6PD   delegating router.3.5.  Other DHCPv6 Functions   The DHCPv6 messages exchanged between the mobile router and the home   agent MAY also be used for other DHCPv6 functions in addition to   DHCPv6PD.  For example, the home agent MAY assign global addresses to   the mobile router and MAY pass other configuration information such   as a list of available DNS recursive name servers [RFC3646] to the   mobile router using the same DHCPv6 messages as used for DHCPv6PD.   The home agent MAY act as a DHCPv6 relay agent for mobile nodes while   it acts as a delegating router for mobile routers.4.  Security Considerations   This document describes the use of DHCPv6 for prefix delegation in   mobile networks.  In addition to the security considerations for   DHCPv6 described in the "Security Considerations" section of the   DHCPv6 base specification [RFC3315] and the "Security Considerations"   of the DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation specification [RFC3633], there are   two aspects that need to be considered.   First, the NEMO Basic Support specification requires the home agent   to prevent a mobile router from claiming mobile network prefixes   belonging to another mobile router.  Upon reception of an implicit   Binding Update from a mobile router, the home agent MUST only add   prefixes into the mobile router's Binding Cache Entry if the mobile   router has a valid DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation lease for said prefixes.   If the mobile router does not have a valid DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation   lease, the home agent MUST NOT add any prefixes into the mobile   router's Binding Cache Entry.  Upon the mobile router obtaining aDroms, et al.                Standards Track                   [Page 10]

RFC 6276            DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO          July 2011   valid DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation lease for a given set of prefixes, the   home agent MUST add these prefixes to the mobile router's Binding   Cache Entry.  This avoids the home agent forwarding traffic addressed   to prefixes that have not been yet delegated to the mobile router.   The use of DHCPv6, as described in this document, requires message   integrity protection and source authentication.  When the mobile   router is at home, normal DHCPv6 operation is used between the mobile   router and the home agent and therefore this specification does not   add any new security issue.  While the mobile router is away from   home, the IPsec security mechanism mandated by Mobile IPv6 [RFC3776]   MUST be used to secure the DHCPv6 signaling.  In the following, we   describe the Security Policy Database (SPD) and Security Association   Database (SAD) entries necessary to protect the DHCPv6 signaling.  We   use the same format used by [RFC4877].  The SPD and SAD entries are   only example configurations.  A particular mobile router   implementation and a home agent implementation could configure   different SPD and SAD entries as long as they provide the required   security of the DHCPv6 signaling messages.   For the examples described in this document, a mobile router with   home address "home_address_1", and a home agent with address   "home_agent_1" are assumed.  If the home address of the mobile router   changes, the SPD and SAD entries need to be re-created or updated for   the new home address.      mobile router SPD-S:        - IF local_address = home_address_1 &             remote_address = home_agent_1 & proto = UDP &             local_port = any & remote_port = DHCP          Then use SA1 (OUT) and SA2 (IN)      mobile router SAD:        - SA1(OUT, spi_a, home_agent_1, ESP, TRANSPORT):              local_address = home_address_1 &              remote_address = home_agent_1 &              proto = UDP & remote_port = DHCP        - SA2(IN, spi_b, home_address_1, ESP, TRANSPORT):              local_address = home_agent_1 &              remote_address = home_address_1 &              proto = UDP & local_port = DHCP      home agent SPD-S:        - IF local_address = home_agent_1 &             remote_address = homa_address_1 & proto = UDP &             local_port = DHCP & remote_port = any          Then use SA2 (OUT) and SA1 (IN)Droms, et al.                Standards Track                   [Page 11]

RFC 6276            DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO          July 2011      home agent SAD:        - SA2(OUT, spi_b, home_address_1, ESP, TRANSPORT):              local_address = home_agent_1 &              remote_address = home_address_1 &              proto = UDP & local_port = DHCP        - SA1(IN, spi_a, home_agent_1, ESP, TRANSPORT):              local_address = home_address_1 &              remote_address = home_agent_1 &              proto = UDP & remote_port = DHCP5.  Acknowledgments   The authors would like to thank people who have given valuable   comments on the mailing list.  Specific suggestions from Ryuji   Wakikawa, George Tsirtsis, Alexandru Petrescu, Vijay Devarapalli, and   Marcelo Bagnulo were incorporated into this document.   The authors would like to thank Julien Laganier, Michaela Vanderveen,   and Jean-Michel Combes for their review of previous versions of this   document.6.  References6.1.  Normative References   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate              Requirement Levels",BCP 14,RFC 2119, March 1997.   [RFC3315]  Droms, R., Bound, J., Volz, B., Lemon, T., Perkins, C.,              and M. Carney, "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for              IPv6 (DHCPv6)",RFC 3315, July 2003.   [RFC3633]  Troan, O. and R. Droms, "IPv6 Prefix Options for Dynamic              Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) version 6",RFC 3633,              December 2003.   [RFC3646]  Droms, R., "DNS Configuration options for Dynamic Host              Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)",RFC 3646,              December 2003.   [RFC3776]  Arkko, J., Devarapalli, V., and F. Dupont, "Using IPsec to              Protect Mobile IPv6 Signaling Between Mobile Nodes and              Home Agents",RFC 3776, June 2004.   [RFC3963]  Devarapalli, V., Wakikawa, R., Petrescu, A., and P.              Thubert, "Network Mobility (NEMO) Basic Support Protocol",RFC 3963, January 2005.Droms, et al.                Standards Track                   [Page 12]

RFC 6276            DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO          July 2011   [RFC4291]  Hinden, R. and S. Deering, "IP Version 6 Addressing              Architecture",RFC 4291, February 2006.   [RFC4877]  Devarapalli, V. and F. Dupont, "Mobile IPv6 Operation with              IKEv2 and the Revised IPsec Architecture",RFC 4877,              April 2007.   [RFC6275]  Perkins, C., Johnson, D., and J. Arkko, "Mobility Support              in IPv6",RFC 6275, July 2011.6.2.  Informative References   [RFC4885]  Ernst, T. and H-Y. Lach, "Network Mobility Support              Terminology",RFC 4885, July 2007.Droms, et al.                Standards Track                   [Page 13]

RFC 6276            DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO          July 2011Authors' Addresses   Ralph Droms   Cisco   1414 Massachusetts Avenue   Boxborough, MA  01719   USA   Phone: +1 978.936.1674   EMail: rdroms@cisco.com   Pascal Thubert   Cisco   Village d'Entreprises Green Side   400, Avenue Roumanille   Biot - Sophia Antipolis  06410   FRANCE   EMail: pthubert@cisco.com   Francis Dupont   Internet Systems Consortium   EMail: fdupont@isc.org   Wassim Haddad   Ericsson   6210 Spine Road   Boulder, CO  80301   USA   Phone: +1 303.473.6963   EMail: Wassim.Haddad@ericsson.com   Carlos J. Bernardos   Universidad Carlos III de Madrid   Av. Universidad, 30   Leganes, Madrid  28911   Spain   Phone: +34 91624 6236   EMail: cjbc@it.uc3m.es   URI:http://www.it.uc3m.es/cjbc/Droms, et al.                Standards Track                   [Page 14]

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp