Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Errata] [Info page]

INFORMATIONAL
Updated by:4548Errata Exist
Network Working Group                                       B. CarpenterRequest for Comments: 4048                                           IBMCategory: Informational                                       April 2005RFC 1888 Is ObsoleteStatus of This Memo   This memo provides information for the Internet community.  It does   not specify an Internet standard of any kind.  Distribution of this   memo is unlimited.Copyright Notice   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).Abstract   This document recommends thatRFC 1888, on Open Systems   Interconnection (OSI) Network Service Access Points (NSAPs) and IPv6,   be reclassified as Historic, as most of it has no further value,   apart from one section, which is faulty.Table of Contents1.  Introduction ..................................................12.  Recommendation to ReclassifyRFC 1888 .........................23.  Security Considerations .......................................24.  IANA Considerations ...........................................25.  Acknowledgements ..............................................26.  Normative References ..........................................3   Author's Address ..................................................3   Full Copyright Statement ..........................................41.  Introduction   [RFC1888] was published as an Experimental RFC in 1996, at an early   stage in the development of IPv6, when it appeared important to   consider usage of Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) addressing for   IPv6.  In Sections3 through5, it defines mappings of certain OSI   Network Service Access Point (NSAP) addresses inside IPv6 addresses,   and how to carry arbitrary NSAP addresses as IPv6 destination   options.  However, it also contains significant "health warnings"   about the difficulty of routing packets in the global Internet using   such addresses.  As far as is known to the IETF, these address   mappings have never been seriously used and are not supported by IPv6   implementations.  Furthermore, the deployment of OSI solutions is notCarpenter                    Informational                      [Page 1]

RFC 4048RFC 1888 Is Obsolete                April 2005   sufficiently widespread that any change in this situation can be   expected.   Additionally,Section 6 of [RFC1888] specifies a mapping of IPv6   addresses inside OSI NSAP addresses.  This mapping has recently   aroused some interest: for example, to allow IP addresses to be   expressed in an Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) context.   Unfortunately,Section 6 of [RFC1888] contains two errors in its   usage of OSI Initial Domain Part (IDP) format:   * first, the text refers to the Internet Code Point (ICP) as a single     octet, whereas it is correctly a 16-bit field;   * second, the text states that "[t]he first three octets are an IDP     in binary format", but [NSAP] states in section A.5.2.1 that "[t]he     abstract syntax for the IDI is decimal digits" and specifies a     preferred binary encoding in section A.5.3 "using a semi-octet to     represent the value of each decimal digit ... , yielding a value in     the range 0000-1001".2.  Recommendation to ReclassifyRFC 1888   Due to the lack of use of one of the mappings, and to the errors in   the documentation of the other, this document recommends that the   IESG reclassify [RFC1888] as Historic.   It is assumed that parties who wish to use a mapping of IPv6   addresses inside OSI NSAP addresses will correct, augment, and   resubmitSection 6 of [RFC1888] as a separate document.3.  Security Considerations   This recommendation has no known impact on the security of the   Internet.4.  IANA Considerations   IANA has marked the IPv6 address prefix 0000 001, reserved for NSAP   Allocation in [RFC3513], simply as Reserved.   IANA is holding the registry for "OSI NSAPA Internet Code Point"   implied bySection 6 of [RFC1888] in abeyance until a replacement for   that Section is approved for publication.5.  Acknowledgements   Scott Brim and Arun Pandey made useful comments on this document.Carpenter                    Informational                      [Page 2]

RFC 4048RFC 1888 Is Obsolete                April 20056.  Normative References   [RFC1888] Bound, J., Carpenter, B., Harrington, D., Houldsworth, J.,             and A. Lloyd, "OSI NSAPs and IPv6",RFC 1888, August 1996.   [RFC3513] Hinden, R. and S. Deering, "Internet Protocol Version 6             (IPv6) Addressing Architecture",RFC 3513, April 2003.   [NSAP]    International Organization for Standardization,             "Information technology -- Open Systems Interconnection --             Network service definition", ISO/IEC 8348:2002, 2002.Author's Address   Brian E. Carpenter   IBM Zurich Research Laboratory   Saeumerstrasse 4 / Postfach   8803 Rueschlikon   Switzerland   EMail: brc@zurich.ibm.comCarpenter                    Informational                      [Page 3]

RFC 4048RFC 1888 Is Obsolete                April 2005Full Copyright Statement   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).   This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions   contained inBCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors   retain all their rights.   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET   ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,   INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE   INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.Intellectual Property   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be   found inBCP 78 andBCP 79.   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository athttp://www.ietf.org/ipr.   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-   ipr@ietf.org.Acknowledgement   Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the   Internet Society.Carpenter                    Informational                      [Page 4]

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp