Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Info page]

Obsoleted by:6225 PROPOSED STANDARD
Network Working Group                                            J. PolkRequest for Comments: 3825                                 J. SchnizleinCategory: Standards Track                                     M. Linsner                                                           Cisco Systems                                                               July 2004Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol Option forCoordinate-based Location Configuration InformationStatus of this Memo   This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the   Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for   improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet   Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state   and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.Copyright Notice   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004).Abstract   This document specifies a Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol Option   for the coordinate-based geographic location of the client.  The   Location Configuration Information (LCI) includes latitude,   longitude, and altitude, with resolution indicators for each.  The   reference datum for these values is also included.Polk, et al.                Standards Track                     [Page 1]

RFC 3825             DHCP Option for Coordinate LCI            July 2004Table of Contents1.  Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21.1.  Conventions  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .31.2.  Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .31.3.  Rationale  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .42.  Location Configuration Information (LCI) Elements. . . . . . .42.1.  Elements of the Location Configuration Information . . .53.  Security Considerations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .84.  IANA Considerations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .85.  Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9Appendix Calculations of Imprecision possible with the DHC LCI . .10A.1.  LCI of "White House" (Example 1) . . . . . . . . . . . .10A.2.  LCI of "Sears Tower" (Example 2) . . . . . . . . . . . .126.  References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .136.1.  Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .136.2.  Informational References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .147.  Author Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .148.  Full Copyright Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .151.  Introduction   This document specifies a Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol [1]   Option for the coordinate-based geographic location of the client, to   be provided by the server.   The DHCP server is assumed to have determined the location from the   Circuit-ID Relay Agent Information Option (RAIO) defined (as SubOpt   1) in [2].  In order to translate the circuit (switch port   identifier) into a location, the DHCP server is assumed to have   access to a service that maps from circuit-ID to the location at   which the circuit connected to that port terminates in the building,   for example, the location of the wall jack.   An important feature of this specification is that after the relevant   DHC exchanges have taken place, the location information is stored on   the end device rather than somewhere else, where retrieving it might   be difficult in practice.   Another important feature of this LCI is its inclusion of a   resolution parameter for each of the dimensions of location.  Because   this resolution parameter need not apply to all dimensions equally, a   resolution value is included for each of the 3 location elements.   Resolution does not define Geographic Privacy policy.Polk, et al.                Standards Track                     [Page 2]

RFC 3825             DHCP Option for Coordinate LCI            July 2004   The resulting location information using this resolution method is a   small fixed length Configuration Information that can be easily   carried in protocols, such as DHCP, which have limited packet size   because this LCI is only 18 bytes long.   Finally, the appendix of this document provides some arithmetic   examples of the implication of different resolution values on the   La/Lo/Alt.1.1.  Conventions used in this document   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this   document are to be interpreted as described in [3].1.2.  Motivation   As applications such as IP Telephony are replacing conventional   telephony, users are expecting the same (or greater) level of   services with the new technology.  One service offered by   conventional telephony that is missing in any standardized fashion   within IP Telephony is for a user to be automatically located by   emergency responders, in a timely fashion, when the user summons help   (by dialing 911 in North America, for example).  Unless strict   administrative rules are followed, the mobility of a wired Ethernet   device within a campus negates any opportunity for an emergency   responder to locate the device with any degree of expediency.  Users   do not want to give up the mobility IP Telephony offers.  Informing   the host device of its geo-location at host configuration time will   allow the device to utilize this geo-location information to inform   others of its current geo-location, if the user and/or application so   desires.   The goal of this option is to enable a wired Ethernet host to obtain   its location, which it could provide to an emergency responder, as   one example.   Wireless hosts can utilize this option to gain knowledge of the   location of the radio access point used during host configuration,   but would need some more exotic mechanisms, maybe GPS, or maybe a   future DHCP option, which includes a list of geo-locations like that   defined here, containing the locations of the radio access points   that are close to the client.Polk, et al.                Standards Track                     [Page 3]

RFC 3825             DHCP Option for Coordinate LCI            July 20041.3.  Rationale   Within the LCI described here, Latitude and Longitude are represented   in fixed-point 2s-complement binary degrees, for the economy of a   smaller option size compared to a string encoding of digits in [7].   The integer parts of these fields are 9 bits long to accommodate +/-   180 degrees.  The fractional part is 25 bits long, better than the   precision of 7 decimal digits.  The length of each field is 40 bits,   34 of which is the sum of the integer (9) and fractional (25) bits,   plus 6 bits of resolution.   Altitude is determined by the Altitude Type (AT) indicated by the AT   field, which is 4 bits long.  Two Altitude Types are defined here,   meters (code=1) and floors (code=2), both of which are 2s-complement   fixed-point with 22 bits of integer part and 8 bits of fractional   part.  Additional Altitude Types MAY be assigned by IANA.  The   "floors" Altitude Type is provided because altitude in meters may not   be known within a building, and a floor indication may be more   useful.   GPS systems today can use WGS84 for horizontal and vertical datums;   [6] defines WGS84 as a three-dimensional datum.  For other datum   values that do not include a vertical component, both the horizontal   and vertical datum of reference will be specified in the IANA record.   Each of these 3 elements begins with an accuracy sub-field of 6 bits,   indicating the number of bits of resolution.  This resolution sub-   field accommodates the desire to easily adjust the precision of a   reported location.  Contents beyond the claimed resolution MAY be   randomized to obscure greater precision that might be available.2.  DHC Location Configuration Information Elements   DHCP is a binary Protocol; using protocols of LCI are likely to be   text based.  Since most coordinate systems translate easily between   binary-based and text-based location output (even emergency services   within the US), translation/conversion is a non-issue with DHCP's   binary format.   This binary format provides a fortunate benefit in a mechanism for   making a true/correct location coordinate imprecise.  It further   provides the capability to have this binary representation be   deterministically imprecise.Polk, et al.                Standards Track                     [Page 4]

RFC 3825             DHCP Option for Coordinate LCI            July 2004   The LCI format is as follows:     0                   1                   2                   3     0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+    |   Code 123    |      16       |   LaRes   |     Latitude      +    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+    |                Latitude (cont'd)              |    LoRes  |   +    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+    |                             Longitude                         |    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+    |   AT  |   AltRes  |                Altitude                   |    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+    |  Alt (cont'd) |     Datum     |    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+2.1.  Elements of the Location Configuration Information   Code 123:  The code for this DHCP option.   16:        The length of this option is 16 bytes.   LaRes:     Latitude resolution.  6 bits indicating the number of              valid bits in the fixed-point value of Latitude.   This value is the number of high-order Latitude bits that should be   considered valid.  Any bits entered to the right of this limit should   not be considered valid and might be purposely false, or zeroed by   the sender.   The examples in the appendix illustrate that a smaller value in the   resolution field increases the area within which the device is   located.   LaRes does not define Geographic Privacy policy.              Values above decimal 34 are undefined and reserved.   Latitude:  a 34 bit fixed point value consisting of 9 bits of integer              and 25 bits of fraction.  Latitude SHOULD be normalized to              within +/- 90 degrees.  Positive numbers are north of the              equator and negative numbers are south of the equator.   A value of 2 in the LaRes field indicates a precision of no greater   than 1/6th that of the globe (in the first example of the appendix).   A value of 34 in the LaRes field indicates a precision of about 3.11   mm in Latitude at the equator.Polk, et al.                Standards Track                     [Page 5]

RFC 3825             DHCP Option for Coordinate LCI            July 2004   LoRes:     Longitude resolution.  6 bits indicating the number of              valid bits in the fixed-point value of Longitude.   This value is the number of high-order Longitude bits that should be   considered valid.  Any bits entered to the right of this limit should   not be considered valid and might be purposely false, or zeroed by   the sender.   LoRes does not define Geographic Privacy policy.              Values above decimal 34 are undefined and reserved.   Longitude: a 34 bit fixed point value consisting of 9 bits of integer              and 25 bits of fraction.  Longitude SHOULD be normalized              to within +/- 180 degrees.  Positive values are East of              the prime meridian and negative (2s complement) numbers              are West of the prime meridian.   A value of 2 in the LoRes field indicates precision of no greater   than 1/6th that of the globe (see first example of the appendix).  A   value of 34 in the LoRes field indicates a precision of about 2.42 mm   in longitude (at the equator).  Because lines of longitude converge   at the poles, the distance is smaller (better precision) for   locations away from the equator.   Altitude:  A 30 bit value defined by the AT field   AltRes:    Altitude resolution.  6 bits indicating the number of              valid bits in the altitude.  Values above 30 (decimal) are              undefined and reserved.   AltRes does not define Geographic Privacy policy.   AT:        Altitude Type for altitude.  Codes defined are:   1: Meters - in 2s-complement fixed-point 22-bit integer part with 8-              bit fraction   If AT = 1, an AltRes value 0.0 would indicate unknown altitude.  The   most precise Altitude would have an AltRes value of 30.  Many values   of AltRes would obscure any variation due to vertical datum   differences.   2: Floors - in 2s-complement fixed-point 22-bit integer part with              8-bit fractionPolk, et al.                Standards Track                     [Page 6]

RFC 3825             DHCP Option for Coordinate LCI            July 2004   AT = 2 for Floors enables representing altitude in a form more   relevant in buildings which have different floor-to-floor dimensions.   An altitude coded as AT = 2, AltRes = 30, and Altitude = 0.0 is   meaningful even outside a building, and represents ground level at   the given latitude and longitude.  Inside a building, 0.0 represents   the floor level associated with ground level at the main entrance.   This document defines a number; one must arrive at the number by   counting floors from the floor defined to be 0.0.   The values represented by this AT will be of local significance.   Since buildings and floors can vary due to lack of common control,   the values chosen to represent the characteristics of an individual   building will be derived and agreed upon by the operator of the   building and the intended users of the data.  Attempting to   standardize this type of function is beyond the scope this document.   Sub-floors can be represented by non-integer values.  Example: a   mezzanine between floor 1 and floor 2 could be represented as a value   = 1.1.  Example: (2) mezzanines between floor 4 and floor 5 could be   represented as values = 4.1 and 4.2 respectively.   Floors located below ground level could be represented by negative   values.   Larger values represent floors that are above (higher in altitude)   floors with lower values.   The AltRes field SHOULD be set to maximum precision when AT = 2   (floors) when a floor value is included in the DHCP Reply, or the   AT = 0 to denote the floor isn't known.   Any additional LCI Altitude Types(s) to be defined for use via this   DHC Option MUST be done through a Standards Track RFC.   Datum: The Map Datum used for the coordinates given in this Option   The datum must include both a horizontal and a vertical reference.   Since the WGS 84 reference datum is three-dimensional, it includes   both.  For any additional datum parameters, the datum codepoint must   specify both horizontal datum and vertical datum references.   The Datum byte has 256 possibilities, of which 3 have been registered   with IANA by this document (all derived from specification in [5]):      1: WGS 84  (Geographical 3D) - World Geodesic System 1984, CRS                 Code 4327, Prime Meridian Name: GreenwichPolk, et al.                Standards Track                     [Page 7]

RFC 3825             DHCP Option for Coordinate LCI            July 2004      2: NAD83 - North American Datum 1983, CRS Code 4269, Prime                 Meridian Name: Greenwich; The associated vertical datum                 is the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88)                 This datum pair is to be used when referencing                 locations on land, not near tidal water (which would                 use Datum = 3 below)      3: NAD83 - North American Datum 1983, CRS Code 4269, Prime                 Meridian Name: Greenwich; The associated vertical datum                 is Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW)                 This datum pair is to be used when referencing                 locations on water/sea/ocean   Any additional LCI datum(s) to be defined for use via this DHC Option   MUST be done through a Standards Track RFC.3.  Security Considerations   Where critical decisions might be based on the value of this GeoConf   option, DHCP authentication in [4] SHOULD be used to protect the   integrity of the DHCP options.   Since there is no privacy protection for DHCP messages, an   eavesdropper who can monitor the link between the DHCP server and   requesting client can discover this LCI.   To minimize the unintended exposure of location information, the LCI   option SHOULD be returned by DHCP servers only when the DHCP client   has included this option in its 'parameter request list' (section 3.5   [1]).   When implementing a DHC server that will serve clients across an   uncontrolled network, one should consider the potential security   risks.4.  IANA Considerations   IANA has assigned a DHCP option code of 123 for the GeoConf option   defined in this document.   The GeoConf Option defines two fields for which IANA maintains a   registry: The Altitude (AT) field (seeSection 2) and the Datum field   (seeSection 2).  The datum indicator MUST include specification of   both horizontal and vertical datum.  New values for the Altitude (AT)   field are assigned through "Standards Action" [RFC 2434].  The   initial values of the Altitude registry are as follows:Polk, et al.                Standards Track                     [Page 8]

RFC 3825             DHCP Option for Coordinate LCI            July 2004   AT = 1  meters of Altitude defined by the vertical datum specified.   AT = 2  building Floors of Altitude.   Datum = 1 denotes the vertical datum WGS 84 as defined by the EPSG as           their CRS Code 4327; CRS Code 4327 also specifies WGS 84 as           the vertical datum   Datum = 2 denotes the vertical datum NAD83 as defined by the EPSG as           their CRS Code 4269; North American Vertical Datum of 1988           (NAVD88) is the associated vertical datum for NAD83   Datum = 3 denotes the vertical datum NAD83 as defined by the EPSG as           their CRS Code 4269; Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW) is the           associated vertical datum for NAD83   Any additional LCI datum(s) to be defined for use via this DHC Option   MUST be done through a Standards Track RFC.5.  Acknowledgements   The authors would like to thank Patrik Falstrom, Ralph Droms, Ted   Hardie, Jon Peterson, and Nadine Abbott for their inputs and   constructive comments regarding this document.  Additionally, the   authors would like to thank Greg Troxel for the education on vertical   datums, and to Carl Reed.Polk, et al.                Standards Track                     [Page 9]

RFC 3825             DHCP Option for Coordinate LCI            July 2004Appendix: Calculations of Imprecision Possible with the DHC LCI   The following examples for two different locations demonstrate how   the Resolution values for Latitude, Longitude, and Altitude can be   used.  In both examples the geo-location values were derived from   maps using the WGS84 map datum, therefore in these examples, the   datum field would have a value = 1 (00000001, or 0x01).A.1.  Location Configuration Information of "White House" (Example 1)   The address was NOT picked for any political reason and can easily be   found on the Internet or mapping software, but was picked as an   easily identifiable location on our planet.   Postal Address:      White House      1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW      Washington, DC 20006   Standing on the sidewalk, north side of White House, between   driveways.      Latitude 38.89868 degrees North (or +38.89868 degrees)      Using 2s complement, 34 bit fixed point, 25 bit fraction      Latitude = 0x04dcc1fc8,      Latitude = 0001001101110011000001111111001000   Longitude 77.03723 degrees West (or -77.03723 degrees)      Using 2s complement, 34 bit fixed point, 25 bit fraction      Longitude = 0xf65ecf031,      Longitude = 1101100101111011001111000000110001   Altitude 15   In this example, we are not inside a structure, therefore we will   assume an altitude value of 15 meters, interpolated from the US   Geological survey map, Washington West quadrangle.      AltRes = 30, 0x1e, 011110      AT = 1, 0x01, 000001      Altitude = 15, 0x0F00, 00000000000000000000000001111100000000   If: LaRes is expressed as value 2 (0x02 or 000010) and LoRes is       expressed as value 2 (0x02 or 000010), then it would describe a       geo-location region that is north of the equator and extends from       -1 degree (west of the meridian) to -128 degrees.  This would       include the area from approximately 600km south of Saltpond,       Ghana, due north to the North Pole and approximately 4400kmPolk, et al.                Standards Track                    [Page 10]

RFC 3825             DHCP Option for Coordinate LCI            July 2004       south-southwest of Los Angeles, CA due north to the North Pole.       This would cover an area of about one-sixth of the globe,       approximately 20 million square nautical miles (nm).   If: LaRes is expressed as value 3 (0x03 or 000011) and LoRes is       expressed as value 3 (0x03 or 000011), then it would describe a       geo-location area that is north from the equator to 63 degrees       north, and -65 degrees to -128 degrees longitude.  This area       includes south of a line from Anchorage, AL to eastern Nunavut,       CN, and from the Amazons of northern Brazil to approximately       4400km south-southwest of Los Angeles, CA.  This area would       include North America, Central America, and parts of Venezuela       and Columbia, except portions of Alaska and northern and eastern       Canada, approximately 10 million square nm.   If: LaRes is expressed as value 5 (0x05 or 000101) and LoRes is       expressed as value 5 (0x05 or 000101), then it would describe a       geo-location area that is latitude 32 north of the equator to       latitude 48 and extends from -64 degrees to -80 degrees       longitude.  This is approximately an east-west boundary of a time       zone, an area of approximately 700,000 square nm.   If: LaRes is expressed as value 9 (0x09 or 001001) and LoRes is       expressed as value 9 (0x09 or 001001), which includes all the       integer bits, then it would describe a geo-location area that is       latitude 38 north of the equator to latitude 39 and extends from       -77 degrees to -78 degrees longitude.  This is an area of       approximately 9600 square km (111.3km x 86.5km).   If: LaRes is expressed as value 18 (0x12 or 010010) and LoRes is       expressed as value 18 (0x12 or 010010), then it would describe a       geo-location area that is latitude 38.8984375 north to latitude       38.9003906 and extends from -77.0390625 degrees to -77.0371094       degrees longitude.  This is an area of approximately 36,600       square meters (169m x 217m).   If: LaRes is expressed as value 22 (0x16 or 010110) and LoRes is       expressed as value 22 (0x16 or 010110), then it would describe a       geo-location area that is latitude 38.896816 north to latitude       38.8985596 and extends from -77.0372314 degrees to -77.0371094       degrees longitude.  This is an area of approximately 143 square       meters (10.5m x 13.6m).   If: LaRes is expressed as value 28 (0x1c or 011100) and LoRes is       expressed as value 28 (0x1c or 011100), then it would describe a       geo-location area that is latitude 38.8986797 north to latitudePolk, et al.                Standards Track                    [Page 11]

RFC 3825             DHCP Option for Coordinate LCI            July 2004       38.8986816 and extends from -77.0372314 degrees to -77.0372296       degrees longitude.  This is an area of approximately 339 square       centimeters (20.9cm x 16.23cm).   If: LaRes is expressed as value 30 (0x1e or 011110) and LoRes is       expressed as value 30 (0x1e or 011110), then it would describe a       geo-location area that is latitude 38.8986797 north to latitude       38.8986802 and extends from -77.0372300 degrees to -77.0372296       degrees longitude.  This is an area of approximately 19.5 square       centimeters (50mm x 39mm).   If: LaRes is expressed as value 34 (0x22 or 100010) and LoRes is       expressed as value 34 (0x22 or 100010), then it would describe a       geo-location area that is latitude 38.8986800 north to latitude       38.8986802 and extends from -77.0372300 degrees to -77.0372296       degrees longitude.  This is an area of approximately 7.5 square       millimeters (3.11mm x 2.42mm).   In the (White House) example, the requirement of emergency responders   in North America via their NENA Model Legislation [8] could be met by   a LaRes value of 21 and a LoRes value of 20.  This would yield a   geo-location that is latitude 38.8984375 north to latitude 38.8988616   north and longitude -77.0371094 to longitude -77.0375977.  This is an   area of approximately 89 feet by 75 feet or 6669 square feet, which   is very close to the 7000 square feet requested by NENA.  In this   example, a service provider could enforce that a device send a   Location Configuration Information with this minimum amount of   resolution for this particular location when calling emergency   services.A.2.  Location Configuration Information of "Sears Tower" (Example 2)   Postal Address:      Sears Tower      103rd Floor      233 S. Wacker Dr.      Chicago, IL  60606   Viewing the Chicago area from the Observation Deck of the Sears   Tower.   Latitude 41.87884 degrees North (or +41.87884 degrees)   Using 2s complement, 34 bit fixed point, 25 bit fraction   Latitude = 0x053c1f751,   Latitude = 0001010011110000011111011101010001Polk, et al.                Standards Track                    [Page 12]

RFC 3825             DHCP Option for Coordinate LCI            July 2004   Longitude 87.63602 degrees West (or -87.63602 degrees)   Using 2s complement, 34 bit fixed point, 25 bit fraction   Longitude = 0xf50ba5b97,   Longitude = 1101010000101110100101101110010111   Altitude 103   In this example, we are inside a structure, therefore we will assume   an altitude value of 103 to indicate the floor we are on.  The   Altitude Type value is 2, indicating floors.  The AltRes field would   indicate that all bits in the Altitude field are true, as we want to   accurately represent the floor of the structure where we are located.   AltRes = 30, 0x1e, 011110   AT = 2, 0x02, 000010   Altitude = 103, 0x00006700, 000000000000000110011100000000   For the accuracy of the latitude and longitude, the best information   available to us was supplied by a generic mapping service that shows   a single geo-loc for all of the Sears Tower.  Therefore we are going   to show LaRes as value 18 (0x12 or 010010) and LoRes as value 18   (0x12 or 010010).  This would be describing a geo-location area that   is latitude 41.8769531 to latitude 41.8789062 and extends from   -87.6367188 degrees to -87.6347657 degrees longitude.  This is an   area of approximately 373412 square feet (713.3 ft. x 523.5 ft.).6.  References6.1.  Normative References   [1] Droms, R., "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol",RFC 2131, March       1997.   [2] Patrick, M., "DHCP Relay Agent Information Option",RFC 3046,       January 2001.   [3]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement       Levels",BCP 14,RFC 2119, March 1997.   [4] Droms, R. and W. Arbaugh, "Authentication for DHCP Messages",RFC3118, June 2001.   [5] European Petroleum Survey Group,http://www.epsg.org/ andhttp://www.ihsenergy.com/epsg/geodetic2.html   [6] World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS 84), MIL-STD-2401,http://www.wgs84.com/Polk, et al.                Standards Track                    [Page 13]

RFC 3825             DHCP Option for Coordinate LCI            July 20046.2.  Informational References   [7] Farrell, C., Schulze, M., Pleitner, S. and D. Baldoni, "DNS       Encoding of Geographical Location",RFC 1712, November 1994.   [8] National Emergency Number Association (NENA) www.nena.org NENA       Technical Information Document on Model Legislation Enhanced 911       for Multi-Line Telephone Systems.7.  Author Information   James M. Polk   Cisco Systems   2200 East President George Bush Turnpike   Richardson, Texas 75082 USA   EMail: jmpolk@cisco.com   John Schnizlein   Cisco Systems   9123 Loughran Road   Fort Washington, MD 20744 USA   EMail: john.schnizlein@cisco.com   Marc Linsner   Cisco Systems   Marco Island, FL 34145 USA   EMail: marc.linsner@cisco.comPolk, et al.                Standards Track                    [Page 14]

RFC 3825             DHCP Option for Coordinate LCI            July 20048.  Full Copyright Statement   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004).  This document is subject   to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained inBCP 78, and   except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET   ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,   INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE   INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.Intellectual Property   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be   found inBCP 78 andBCP 79.   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository athttp://www.ietf.org/ipr.   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-   ipr@ietf.org.Acknowledgement   Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the   Internet Society.Polk, et al.                Standards Track                    [Page 15]

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp