Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Info page]

Obsoleted by:4668 PROPOSED STANDARD
Network Working Group                                            B. AbobaRequest for Comments: 2618                                        G. ZornCategory: Standards Track                                       Microsoft                                                                June 1999RADIUS Authentication Client MIBStatus of this Memo   This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the   Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for   improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet   Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state   and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.Copyright Notice   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999).  All Rights Reserved.Abstract   This memo defines a set of extensions which instrument RADIUS   authentication client functions. These extensions represent a portion   of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network   management protocols in the Internet community.  Using these   extensions IP-based management stations can manage RADIUS   authentication clients.1.  Introduction   This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB)   for use with network management protocols in the Internet community.   In particular, it describes managed objects used for managing RADIUS   authentication clients.   Today a wide range of network devices, including routers and NASes,   act as RADIUS authentication clients in order to provide   authentication and authorization services. As a result, the effective   management of RADIUS authentication clients is of considerable   importance.Aboba & Zorn                Standards Track                     [Page 1]

RFC 2618            RADIUS Authentication Client MIB           June 19992.  The SNMP Management Framework   The SNMP Management Framework presently consists of five major   components:    o   An overall architecture, described inRFC 2571 [1].    o   Mechanisms for describing and naming objects and events for the        purpose of management. The first version of this Structure of        Management Information (SMI) is called SMIv1 and described in        STD 16,RFC 1155 [2], STD 16,RFC 1212 [3] andRFC 1215 [4].        The second version, called SMIv2, is described in STD 58,RFC2578 [5],RFC 2579 [6] andRFC 2580 [7].    o   Message protocols for transferring management information. The        first version of the SNMP message protocol is called SNMPv1 and        described in STD 15,RFC 1157 [8]. A second version of the        SNMP message protocol, which is not an Internet standards        track protocol, is called SNMPv2c and described inRFC 1901        [9] andRFC 1906 [10].  The third version of the message        protocol is called SNMPv3 and described inRFC 1906 [10],RFC2572 [11] andRFC 2574 [12].    o   Protocol operations for accessing management information. The        first set of protocol operations and associated PDU formats is        described in STD 15,RFC 1157 [8]. A second set of protocol        operations and associated PDU formats is described inRFC 1905        [13].    o   A set of fundamental applications described inRFC 2573 [14] and        the view-based access control mechanism described inRFC 2575        [15].   Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed   the Management Information Base or MIB.  Objects in the MIB are   defined using the mechanisms defined in the SMI.   This memo specifies a MIB module that is compliant to the SMIv2. A   MIB conforming to the SMIv1 can be produced through the appropriate   translations. The resulting translated MIB must be semantically   equivalent, except where objects or events are omitted because no   translation is possible (use of Counter64). Some machine readable   information in SMIv2 will be converted into textual descriptions in   SMIv1 during the translation process. However, this loss of machine   readable information is not considered to change the semantics of the   MIB.Aboba & Zorn                Standards Track                     [Page 2]

RFC 2618            RADIUS Authentication Client MIB           June 19993.  Overview   The RADIUS authentication protocol, described in [16], distinguishes   between the client function and the server function. In RADIUS   authentication, clients send Access-Requests, and servers reply with   Access-Accepts, Access-Rejects, and Access-Challenges.  Typically NAS   devices implement the client function, and thus would be expected to   implement the RADIUS authentication client MIB, while RADIUS   authentication servers implement the server function, and thus would   be expected to implement the RADIUS authentication server MIB.   However, it is possible for a RADIUS authentication entity to perform   both client and server functions. For example, a RADIUS proxy may act   as a server to one or more RADIUS authentication clients, while   simultaneously acting as an authentication client to one or more   authentication servers. In such situations, it is expected that   RADIUS entities combining client and server functionality will   support both the client and server MIBs.3.1.  Selected objects   This MIB module contains two scalars as well as a single table:   (1)  the RADIUS Authentication Server Table contains one row for        each RADIUS authentication server that the client shares a        secret with.   Each entry in the RADIUS Authentication Server Table includes fifteen   columns presenting a view of the activity of the RADIUS   authentication client.4.  DefinitionsRADIUS-AUTH-CLIENT-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGINIMPORTS       MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE, OBJECT-IDENTITY,       Counter32, Integer32, Gauge32,       IpAddress, TimeTicks, mib-2      FROM SNMPv2-SMI       SnmpAdminString                  FROM SNMP-FRAMEWORK-MIB       MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP  FROM SNMPv2-CONF;radiusAuthClientMIB MODULE-IDENTITY       LAST-UPDATED "9906110000Z" -- 11 Jun 1999       ORGANIZATION "IETF RADIUS Working Group."       CONTACT-INFO              " Bernard Aboba                MicrosoftAboba & Zorn                Standards Track                     [Page 3]

RFC 2618            RADIUS Authentication Client MIB           June 1999                One Microsoft Way                Redmond, WA  98052                US                Phone: +1 425 936 6605                EMail: bernarda@microsoft.com"       DESCRIPTION             "The MIB module for entities implementing the client              side of the Remote Access Dialin User Service (RADIUS)              authentication protocol."       REVISION "9906110000Z"    -- 11 Jun 1999       DESCRIPTION "Initial version as published inRFC 2618"       ::= { radiusAuthentication 2 }radiusMIB OBJECT-IDENTITY       STATUS  current       DESCRIPTION             "The OID assigned to RADIUS MIB work by the IANA."        ::= { mib-2 67 }radiusAuthentication  OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {radiusMIB 1}radiusAuthClientMIBObjects     OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=                                               { radiusAuthClientMIB 1 }radiusAuthClient  OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { radiusAuthClientMIBObjects 1 }radiusAuthClientInvalidServerAddresses OBJECT-TYPE      SYNTAX Counter32      MAX-ACCESS read-only      STATUS current      DESCRIPTION            "The number of RADIUS Access-Response packets             received from unknown addresses."      ::= { radiusAuthClient 1 }radiusAuthClientIdentifier OBJECT-TYPE      SYNTAX SnmpAdminString      MAX-ACCESS read-only      STATUS current      DESCRIPTION             "The NAS-Identifier of the RADIUS authentication client.              This is not necessarily the same as sysName in MIB II."      ::= { radiusAuthClient 2 }radiusAuthServerTable OBJECT-TYPE      SYNTAX     SEQUENCE OF RadiusAuthServerEntry      MAX-ACCESS not-accessibleAboba & Zorn                Standards Track                     [Page 4]

RFC 2618            RADIUS Authentication Client MIB           June 1999      STATUS     current      DESCRIPTION            "The (conceptual) table listing the RADIUS authentication             servers with which the client shares a secret."      ::= { radiusAuthClient 3 }radiusAuthServerEntry OBJECT-TYPE      SYNTAX     RadiusAuthServerEntry      MAX-ACCESS not-accessible      STATUS     current      DESCRIPTION            "An entry (conceptual row) representing a RADIUS             authentication server with which the client shares             a secret."      INDEX      { radiusAuthServerIndex }      ::= { radiusAuthServerTable 1 }RadiusAuthServerEntry ::= SEQUENCE {      radiusAuthServerIndex                           Integer32,      radiusAuthServerAddress                         IpAddress,      radiusAuthClientServerPortNumber                Integer32,      radiusAuthClientRoundTripTime                   TimeTicks,      radiusAuthClientAccessRequests                  Counter32,      radiusAuthClientAccessRetransmissions           Counter32,      radiusAuthClientAccessAccepts                   Counter32,      radiusAuthClientAccessRejects                   Counter32,      radiusAuthClientAccessChallenges                Counter32,      radiusAuthClientMalformedAccessResponses        Counter32,      radiusAuthClientBadAuthenticators               Counter32,      radiusAuthClientPendingRequests                   Gauge32,      radiusAuthClientTimeouts                        Counter32,      radiusAuthClientUnknownTypes                    Counter32,      radiusAuthClientPacketsDropped                  Counter32}radiusAuthServerIndex OBJECT-TYPE      SYNTAX     Integer32 (1..2147483647)      MAX-ACCESS not-accessible      STATUS     current      DESCRIPTION             "A number uniquely identifying each RADIUS             Authentication server with which this client             communicates."      ::= { radiusAuthServerEntry 1 }radiusAuthServerAddress OBJECT-TYPE      SYNTAX     IpAddress      MAX-ACCESS read-onlyAboba & Zorn                Standards Track                     [Page 5]

RFC 2618            RADIUS Authentication Client MIB           June 1999      STATUS     current      DESCRIPTION            "The IP address of the RADIUS authentication server             referred to in this table entry."      ::= { radiusAuthServerEntry 2 }radiusAuthClientServerPortNumber  OBJECT-TYPE      SYNTAX Integer32 (0..65535)      MAX-ACCESS read-only      STATUS current      DESCRIPTION            "The UDP port the client is using to send requests to             this server."      ::= { radiusAuthServerEntry 3 }radiusAuthClientRoundTripTime  OBJECT-TYPE      SYNTAX TimeTicks      MAX-ACCESS read-only      STATUS current      DESCRIPTION            "The time interval (in hundredths of a second) between             the most recent Access-Reply/Access-Challenge and the             Access-Request that matched it from this RADIUS             authentication server."      ::= { radiusAuthServerEntry 4 }-- Request/Response statistics---- TotalIncomingPackets = Accepts + Rejects + Challenges + UnknownTypes---- TotalIncomingPackets - MalformedResponses - BadAuthenticators --- UnknownTypes - PacketsDropped = Successfully received---- AccessRequests + PendingRequests + ClientTimeouts =-- Successfully Received----radiusAuthClientAccessRequests OBJECT-TYPE      SYNTAX Counter32      MAX-ACCESS read-only      STATUS current      DESCRIPTION            "The number of RADIUS Access-Request packets sent             to this server. This does not include retransmissions."      ::= { radiusAuthServerEntry 5 }radiusAuthClientAccessRetransmissions OBJECT-TYPEAboba & Zorn                Standards Track                     [Page 6]

RFC 2618            RADIUS Authentication Client MIB           June 1999      SYNTAX Counter32      MAX-ACCESS read-only      STATUS current      DESCRIPTION            "The number of RADIUS Access-Request packets             retransmitted to this RADIUS authentication server."      ::= { radiusAuthServerEntry 6 }radiusAuthClientAccessAccepts OBJECT-TYPE      SYNTAX Counter32      MAX-ACCESS read-only      STATUS current      DESCRIPTION            "The number of RADIUS Access-Accept packets             (valid or invalid) received from this server."      ::= { radiusAuthServerEntry 7 }radiusAuthClientAccessRejects OBJECT-TYPE      SYNTAX Counter32      MAX-ACCESS read-only      STATUS current      DESCRIPTION            "The number of RADIUS Access-Reject packets             (valid or invalid) received from this server."      ::= { radiusAuthServerEntry  8 }radiusAuthClientAccessChallenges OBJECT-TYPE      SYNTAX Counter32      MAX-ACCESS read-only      STATUS current      DESCRIPTION            "The number of RADIUS Access-Challenge packets             (valid or invalid) received from this server."      ::= { radiusAuthServerEntry 9 }-- "Access-Response" includes an Access-Accept, Access-Challenge-- or Access-RejectradiusAuthClientMalformedAccessResponses OBJECT-TYPE      SYNTAX Counter32      MAX-ACCESS read-only      STATUS current      DESCRIPTION            "The number of malformed RADIUS Access-Response             packets received from this server.             Malformed packets include packets with             an invalid length. Bad authenticators or             Signature attributes or unknown types are notAboba & Zorn                Standards Track                     [Page 7]

RFC 2618            RADIUS Authentication Client MIB           June 1999             included as malformed access responses."      ::= { radiusAuthServerEntry 10 }radiusAuthClientBadAuthenticators OBJECT-TYPE      SYNTAX Counter32      MAX-ACCESS read-only      STATUS current      DESCRIPTION            "The number of RADIUS Access-Response packets             containing invalid authenticators or Signature             attributes received from this server."      ::= { radiusAuthServerEntry 11 }radiusAuthClientPendingRequests OBJECT-TYPE      SYNTAX Gauge32      MAX-ACCESS read-only      STATUS current      DESCRIPTION            "The number of RADIUS Access-Request packets             destined for this server that have not yet timed out             or received a response. This variable is incremented             when an Access-Request is sent and decremented due to             receipt of an Acess-Accept, Access-Reject or             Access-Challenge, a timeout or retransmission."      ::= { radiusAuthServerEntry 12 }radiusAuthClientTimeouts OBJECT-TYPE     SYNTAX Counter32     MAX-ACCESS read-only     STATUS current     DESCRIPTION            "The number of authentication timeouts to this server.             After a timeout the client may retry to the same             server, send to a different server, or             give up. A retry to the same server is counted as a             retransmit as well as a timeout. A send to a different             server is counted as a Request as well as a timeout."      ::= { radiusAuthServerEntry  13 }radiusAuthClientUnknownTypes OBJECT-TYPE      SYNTAX Counter32      MAX-ACCESS read-only      STATUS current      DESCRIPTION            "The number of RADIUS packets of unknown type which             were received from this server on the authentication port."      ::= { radiusAuthServerEntry  14 }Aboba & Zorn                Standards Track                     [Page 8]

RFC 2618            RADIUS Authentication Client MIB           June 1999radiusAuthClientPacketsDropped OBJECT-TYPE      SYNTAX Counter32      MAX-ACCESS read-only      STATUS current      DESCRIPTION            "The number of RADIUS packets of which were             received from this server on the authentication port             and dropped for some other reason."      ::= { radiusAuthServerEntry  15 }-- conformance informationradiusAuthClientMIBConformance             OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { radiusAuthClientMIB 2 }radiusAuthClientMIBCompliances             OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { radiusAuthClientMIBConformance 1 }radiusAuthClientMIBGroups             OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { radiusAuthClientMIBConformance 2 }-- compliance statementsradiusAuthClientMIBCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE     STATUS  current     DESCRIPTION           "The compliance statement for authentication clients            implementing the RADIUS Authentication Client MIB."     MODULE  -- this module            MANDATORY-GROUPS { radiusAuthClientMIBGroup }     ::= { radiusAuthClientMIBCompliances 1 }-- units of conformanceradiusAuthClientMIBGroup OBJECT-GROUP     OBJECTS { radiusAuthClientIdentifier,               radiusAuthClientInvalidServerAddresses,               radiusAuthServerAddress,               radiusAuthClientServerPortNumber,               radiusAuthClientRoundTripTime,               radiusAuthClientAccessRequests,               radiusAuthClientAccessRetransmissions,               radiusAuthClientAccessAccepts,               radiusAuthClientAccessRejects,               radiusAuthClientAccessChallenges,               radiusAuthClientMalformedAccessResponses,Aboba & Zorn                Standards Track                     [Page 9]

RFC 2618            RADIUS Authentication Client MIB           June 1999               radiusAuthClientBadAuthenticators,               radiusAuthClientPendingRequests,               radiusAuthClientTimeouts,               radiusAuthClientUnknownTypes,               radiusAuthClientPacketsDropped            }     STATUS  current     DESCRIPTION           "The basic collection of objects providing management of            RADIUS Authentication Clients."     ::= { radiusAuthClientMIBGroups 1 }END5.  References   [1]  Harrington, D., Presuhn, R., and B. Wijnen, "An Architecture for        Describing SNMP Management Frameworks",RFC 2571, April 1999.   [2]  Rose, M., and K. McCloghrie, "Structure and Identification of        Management Information for TCP/IP-based Internets", STD 16,RFC1155, May 1990.   [3]  Rose, M., and K. McCloghrie, "Concise MIB Definitions", STD 16,RFC 1212, March 1991.   [4]  Rose, M., "A Convention for Defining Traps for use with the        SNMP",RFC 1215, Performance Systems International, March 1991.   [5]  McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J., Rose,        M. and S. Waldbusser, "Structure of Management Information        Version 2 (SMIv2)", STD 58,RFC 2578, April 1999.   [6]  McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J., Rose,        M. and S. Waldbusser, "Textual Conventions for SMIv2", STD 58,RFC 2579, April 1999.   [7]  McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J., Rose,        M. and S. Waldbusser, "Conformance Statements for SMIv2", STD        58,RFC 2580, April 1999.   [8]  Case, J., Fedor, M., Schoffstall, M., and J. Davin, "Simple        Network Management Protocol", STD 15,RFC 1157, May 1990.   [9]  Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M., and S. Waldbusser,        "Introduction to Community-based SNMPv2",RFC 1901, January        1996.Aboba & Zorn                Standards Track                    [Page 10]

RFC 2618            RADIUS Authentication Client MIB           June 1999   [10] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M., and S. Waldbusser,        "Transport Mappings for Version 2 of the Simple Network        Management Protocol (SNMPv2)",RFC 1906, January 1996.   [11] Case, J., Harrington D., Presuhn R., and B. Wijnen, "Message        Processing and Dispatching for the Simple Network Management        Protocol (SNMP)",RFC 2572, April 1999.   [12] Blumenthal, U., and B. Wijnen, "User-based Security Model for        Version 3 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv3)",RFC 2574, April 1999.   [13] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M., and S. Waldbusser, "Protocol        Operations for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management        Protocol (SNMPv2)",RFC 1905, January 1996.   [14] Levi, D., Meyer, P., and B. Stewart, "SNMP Applications",RFC2573, April 1999.   [15] Wijnen, B., Presuhn, R., and K. McCloghrie, "View-based Access        Control Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol        (SNMP)",RFC 2575, April 1999.   [16] Rigney, C., Rubens, A., Simpson W. and S. Willens, "Remote        Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS)",RFC 2138, April        1997.6.  Security Considerations   There are no management objects defined in this MIB that have a MAX-   ACCESS clause of read-write and/or read-create.  So, if this MIB is   implemented correctly, then there is no risk that an intruder can   alter or create any management objects of this MIB via direct SNMP   SET operations.   There are a number of managed objects in this MIB that may contain   sensitive information. These are:   radiusAuthServerAddress             This can be used to determine the address of the RADIUS             authentication server with which the client is             communicating.  This information could be useful in             mounting an attack on the authentication server.   radiusAuthClientServerPortNumber This can be used to determine the             port number on which the RADIUS authentication client is             sending. This information could be useful in impersonating             the client in order to send data to the authenticationAboba & Zorn                Standards Track                    [Page 11]

RFC 2618            RADIUS Authentication Client MIB           June 1999             server.   It is thus important to control even GET access to these objects and   possibly to even encrypt the values of these object when sending them   over the network via SNMP.  Not all versions of SNMP provide features   for such a secure environment.   SNMPv1 by itself is not a secure environment. Even if the network   itself is secure (for example by using IPSec), there is no control as   to who on the secure network is allowed to access and GET/SET   (read/change/create/delete) the objects in this MIB.   It is recommended that the implementers consider the security   features as provided by the SNMPv3 framework. Specifically, the use   of the User-based Security ModelRFC 2574 [12] and the View-based   Access Control ModelRFC 2575 [15] is recommended.  Using these   security features, customer/users can give access to the objects only   to those principals (users) that have legitimate rights to GET or SET   (change/create/delete) them.7.  Acknowledgments   The authors acknowledge the contributions of the RADIUS Working Group   in the development of this MIB.  Thanks to Narendra Gidwani of   Microsoft, Allan C. Rubens of MERIT, Carl Rigney of Livingston and   Peter Heitman of American Internet Corporation for useful discussions   of this problem space.8.  Authors' Addresses   Bernard Aboba   Microsoft Corporation   One Microsoft Wy   Redmond, WA 98052   Phone: 425-936-6605   EMail: bernarda@microsoft.com   Glen Zorn   Microsoft Corporation   One Microsoft Way   Redmond, WA 98052   Phone: 425-703-1559   EMail: glennz@microsoft.comAboba & Zorn                Standards Track                    [Page 12]

RFC 2618            RADIUS Authentication Client MIB           June 19999.  Intellectural Property Statement   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any   intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights   might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it   has made any effort to identify any such rights.  Information on the   IETF's procedures with respect to rights in standards-track and   standards-related documentation can be found inBCP-11.  Copies of   claims of rights made available for publication and any assurances of   licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to   obtain a general license or permission for the use of such   proprietary rights by implementors or users of this specification can   be obtained from the IETF Secretariat.   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary   rights which may cover technology that may be required to practice   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF Executive   Director.Aboba & Zorn                Standards Track                    [Page 13]

RFC 2618            RADIUS Authentication Client MIB           June 199910.  Full Copyright Statement   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999).  All Rights Reserved.   This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to   others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it   or assist in its implmentation may be prepared, copied, published and   distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any kind,   provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are   included on all such copies and derivative works.  However, this   document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing   the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other   Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of   developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for   copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be   followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than   English.   The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be   revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.   This document and the information contained herein is provided on an   "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING   TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING   BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION   HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF   MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.Acknowledgement   Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the   Internet Society.Aboba & Zorn                Standards Track                    [Page 14]

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp