Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Info page]

PROPOSED STANDARD
Network Working Group                                       B. CarpenterRequest for Comments: 2529                                           IBMCategory: Standards Track                                        C. Jung                                                                    3Com                                                              March 1999Transmission of IPv6 over IPv4 Domains without Explicit TunnelsStatus of this Memo   This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the   Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for   improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet   Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state   and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.Copyright Notice   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999).  All Rights Reserved.Abstract   This memo specifies the frame format for transmission of IPv6 [IPV6]   packets and the method of forming IPv6 link-local addresses over IPv4   domains.  It also specifies the content of the Source/Target Link-   layer Address option used in the Router Solicitation, Router   Advertisement, Neighbor Solicitation, and Neighbor Advertisement and   Redirect messages, when those messages are transmitted on an IPv4   multicast network.   The motivation for this method is to allow isolated IPv6 hosts,   located on a physical link which has no directly connected IPv6   router, to become fully functional IPv6 hosts by using an IPv4 domain   that supports IPv4 multicast as their virtual local link. It uses   IPv4 multicast as a "virtual Ethernet".Table of Contents1. Introduction....................................................22. Maximum Transmission Unit.......................................23. Frame Format....................................................34. Stateless Autoconfiguration and Link-Local Addresses............35. Address Mapping -- Unicast......................................46. Address Mapping -- Multicast....................................47. Scaling and Transition Isues....................................58. IANA Considerations.............................................69. Security Considerations.........................................6Carpenter & Jung            Standards Track                     [Page 1]

RFC 2529         Transmission of IPv6 Packets over IPv4       March 1999   Acknowledgements...................................................7   References.........................................................7   APPENDIX A: IPv4 Multicast Addresses for Neighbor Discovery........8   Authors' Addresses.................................................9   Full Copyright Notice.............................................101. Introduction   This memo specifies the frame format for transmission of IPv6 [IPV6]   packets and the method of forming IPv6 link-local addresses over IPv4   multicast "domains".  For the purposes of this document, an IPv4   domain is a fully interconnected set of IPv4 subnets, within the same   local multicast scope, on which there are at least two IPv6 nodes   conforming to this specification.  This IPv4 domain could form part   of the globally-unique IPv4 address space, or could form part of a   private IPv4 network [RFC 1918].   This memo also specifies the content of the Source/Target Link-layer   Address option used in the Router Solicitation, Router Advertisement,   Neighbor Solicitation, Neighbor Advertisement and Redirect messages   described in [DISC], when those messages are transmitted on an IPv4   multicast domain.   The motivation for this method is to allow isolated IPv6 hosts,   located on a physical link which has no directly connected IPv6   router, to become fully functional IPv6 hosts by using an IPv4   multicast domain as their virtual local link.  Thus, at least one   IPv6 router using the same method must be connected to the same IPv4   domain if IPv6 routing to other links is required.   IPv6 hosts connected using this method do not require IPv4-compatible   addresses or configured tunnels.  In this way IPv6 gains considerable   independence of the underlying links and can step over many hops of   IPv4 subnets. The mechanism is known formally as "IPv6 over IPv4" or   "6over4" and colloquially as "virtual Ethernet".   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED",  "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].2. Maximum Transmission Unit   The default MTU size for IPv6 packets on an IPv4 domain is 1480   octets.  This size may be varied by a Router Advertisement [DISC]   containing an MTU option which specifies a different MTU, or by   manual configuration of each node.Carpenter & Jung            Standards Track                     [Page 2]

RFC 2529         Transmission of IPv6 Packets over IPv4       March 1999   Note that if by chance the IPv6 MTU size proves to be too large for   some intermediate IPv4 subnet, IPv4 fragmentation will ensue.  While   undesirable, this is not disastrous. However, the IPv4 "do not   fragment" bit MUST NOT be set in the encapsulating IPv4 header.3. Frame Format   IPv6 packets are transmitted in IPv4 packets [RFC 791] with an IPv4   protocol type of 41, the same as has been assigned in [RFC 1933] for   IPv6 packets that are tunneled inside of IPv4 frames.  The IPv4   header contains the Destination and Source IPv4 addresses.  The IPv4   packet body contains the IPv6 header followed immediately by the   payload.     0                   1                   2                   3     0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+    |Version|  IHL  |Type of Service|          Total Length         |    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+    |         Identification        |Flags|      Fragment Offset    |    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+    |  Time to Live | Protocol 41   |         Header Checksum       |    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+    |                       Source Address                          |    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+    |                    Destination Address                        |    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+    |                    Options                    |    Padding    |    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+    |            IPv6 header and payload ...              /    +-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+------+------+   If there are IPv4 options, then padding SHOULD be added to the IPv4   header such that the IPv6 header starts on a boundary that is a 32-   bit offset from the end of the datalink header.   The Time to Live field SHOULD be set to a low value, to prevent such   packets accidentally leaking from the IPv4 domain.  This MUST be a   configurable parameter, with a recommended default of 8.4. Stateless Autoconfiguration and Link-Local Addresses   The Interface Identifier [AARCH] of an IPv4 interface is the 32-bit   IPv4 address of that interface, with the octets in the same order in   which they would appear in the header of an IPv4 packet, padded at   the left with zeros to a total of 64 bits.  Note that the "Universal/   Local" bit is zero, indicating that the Interface Identifer is not   globally unique.  When the host has more than one IPv4 address in useCarpenter & Jung            Standards Track                     [Page 3]

RFC 2529         Transmission of IPv6 Packets over IPv4       March 1999   on the physical interface concerned, an administrative choice of one   of these IPv4 addresses is made.   An IPv6 address prefix used for stateless autoconfiguration [CONF] of   an IPv4 interface MUST have a length of 64 bits except for a special   case mentioned inSection 7.   The IPv6 Link-local address [AARCH] for an IPv4 virtual interface is   formed by appending the Interface Identifier, as defined above, to   the prefix FE80::/64.    +-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+------+------+    |  FE      80      00      00      00      00      00     00  |    +-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+------+------+    |  00      00   |  00   |  00   |   IPv4 Address              |    +-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+------+------+5. Address Mapping -- Unicast   The procedure for mapping IPv6 addresses into IPv4 virtual link-layer   addresses is described in [DISC].  The Source/Target Link-layer   Address option has the following form when the link layer is IPv4.   Since the length field is in units of 8 bytes, the value below is 1.    +-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+    | Type  |Length | must be zero  |        IPv4 Address           |    +-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+   Type:    1 for Source Link-layer address.    2 for Target Link-layer address.   Length:    1 (in units of 8 octets).   IPv4 Address:   The 32 bit IPv4 address, in network byte order.  This is the address   the interface currently responds to, and may be different from the   Interface Identifier for stateless autoconfiguration.6. Address Mapping -- Multicast   IPv4 multicast MUST be available. An IPv6 packet with a multicast   destination address DST MUST be transmitted to the IPv4 multicast   address of Organization-Local Scope using the mapping below.  These   IPv4 multicast addresses SHOULD be taken from the blockCarpenter & Jung            Standards Track                     [Page 4]

RFC 2529         Transmission of IPv6 Packets over IPv4       March 1999   239.192.0.0/16, a sub-block of the Organization-Local Scope address   block, or, if all of those are not available, from the expansion   blocks defined in [ADMIN].  Note that when they are formed using the   expansion blocks, they use only a /16 sized block.        +-------+-------+-------+-------+        |  239  |  OLS  | DST14 | DST15 |        +-------+-------+-------+-------+        DST14, DST15        last two bytes of IPv6 multicast address.        OLS                 from the configured Organization-Local                            Scope address block.  SHOULD be 192,                            see [ADMIN] for details.   No new IANA registration procedures are required for the above.  Seeappendix A. for a list of all the multicast groups that must be   joined to support Neighbor Discovery.7. Scaling and Transition Issues   The multicast mechanism described inSection 6 above appears to have   essentially the same scaling properties as native IPv6 over most   media, except for the slight reduction in MTU size which will   slightly reduce bulk throughput.  On an ATM network, where IPv4   multicast relies on relatively complex mechanisms, it is to be   expected that IPv6 over IPv4 over ATM will perform less well than   native IPv6 over ATM.   The "IPv6 over IPv4" mechanism is intended to take its place in the   range of options available for transition from IPv4 to IPv6.  In   particular it allows a site to run both IPv4 and IPv6 in coexistence,   without having to configure IPv6 hosts either with IPv4-compatible   addresses or with tunnels.  Interfaces of the IPv6 router and hosts   will of course need to be enabled in "6over4" mode.   A site may choose to start its IPv6 transition by configuring one   IPv6 router to support "6over4" on an interface connected to the   site's IPv4 domain, and another IPv6 format on an interface connected   to the IPv6 Internet.  Any enabled "6over4" hosts in the IPv4 domain   will then be able to communicate both with the router and with the   IPv6 Internet, without manual configuration of a tunnel and without   the need for an IPv4-compatible IPv6 address, either stateless or   stateful address configuration providing the IPv6 address to the IPv6   host.Carpenter & Jung            Standards Track                     [Page 5]

RFC 2529         Transmission of IPv6 Packets over IPv4       March 1999   During transition, routers may need to advertise at least two IPv6   prefixes, one for the native LAN (e.g. Ethernet) and one for   "6over4".  As with any IPv6 prefix assigned to an IPv6 subnet, the   latter MUST be unique within its scope, whether site-local or global   addressing is used.   Also note that when a router is handling both native LAN and "6over4"   on the same physical interface,  during stateless autoconfiguration,   there is a period when IPv6 link-local addresses are used, in both   cases with the prefix FE80::/64. Note that the prefix-length for   these link-local adddress MUST then be 128 so that the two cases can   be distinguished.   As the site installs additional IPv6 routers, "6over4" hosts which   become physically adjacent to IPv6 routers can be changed to run as   native IPv6 hosts, with the the only impact on IPv6 applications   being a slight increase in MTU size. At some stage during transition,   it might be convenient to dual home hosts in both native LAN and   "6over4" mode, but this is not required.8. IANA Considerations   No assignments by the IANA are required beyond those in [ADMIN].9. Security Considerations   Implementors should be aware that, in addition to posssible attacks   against IPv6, security attacks against IPv4 must also be considered.   Use of IP security at both IPv4 and IPv6 levels should nevertheless   be avoided, for efficiency reasons.  For example, if IPv6 is running   encrypted, encryption of IPv4 would be redundant except if traffic   analysis is felt to be a threat.  If IPv6 is running authenticated,   then authentication of IPv4 will add little.  Conversely, IPv4   security will not protect IPv6 traffic once it leaves the IPv6-over-   IPv4 domain.  Therefore, implementing IPv6 security is required even   if IPv4 security is available.   There is a possible spoofing attack in which spurious 6over4 packets   are injected into a 6over4 domain from outside. Thus, boundary   routers MUST discard multicast IPv4 packets with source or   destination multicast addresses of organisation local scope as   defined insection 6 above, if they arrive on physical interfaces   outside that scope. To defend against spurious unicast 6over4   packets, boundary routers MUST discard incoming IPv4 packets with   protocol type 41 from unknown sources, i.e.  IPv6-in-IPv4 tunnels   must only be accepted from trusted sources.  Unless IPSECCarpenter & Jung            Standards Track                     [Page 6]

RFC 2529         Transmission of IPv6 Packets over IPv4       March 1999   authentication is available, the RECOMMENDED technique for this is to   configure the boundary router only to accept protocol type 41 packets   from source addresses within a trusted range or ranges.Acknowledgements   The basic idea presented above is not original, and we have had   invaluable comments from Matt Crawford, Steve Deering, Dan   Harrington, Rich Draves, Erik Nordmark, Quang Nguyen, Thomas Narten,   and other members of the IPNG and NGTRANS working groups.   This document is seriously ripped off fromRFC 1972 written by Matt   Crawford. Brian Carpenter was at CERN when the work was started.References   [AARCH]    Hinden, R., and S. Deering, "IP Version 6 Addressing              Architecture",RFC 2373, July 1998.   [ADMIN]    Meyer, D., "Administratively Scoped IP Multicast",BCP 23,RFC 2365, July 1998.   [CONF]     Thomson, S. and T. Narten, "IPv6 Stateless Address              Autoconfiguration",RFC 2462, December 1998.   [DISC]     Narten, T., Nordmark, E. and W. Simpson, "Neighbor              Discovery for IP Version 6 (IPv6)",RFC 2461, December              1998.   [IPV6]     Deering, S. and R. Hinden, "Internet Protocol, Version 6              (IPv6) Specification",RFC 2460, December 1998.   [RFC 791]  Postel, J., "Internet Protocol", STD 5,RFC 791, September              1981.   [RFC 1918] Rekhter, Y., Moskowitz, R., Karrenberg, D., de Groot, G.              and E. Lear, "Address Allocation for Private Internets",RFC 1918, February 1996.   [RFC 1933] Gilligan, R. and E. Nordmark, "Transition Mechanisms for              IPv6 Hosts and Routers",RFC 1933, April 1996.   [RFC 2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate              Requirement Levels",BCP 14,RFC 2119, March 1997.   [RFC 1972] Crawford, M., "A Method for the Transmission of IPv6              Packets over Ethernet Networks",RFC 1972, August 1996.Carpenter & Jung            Standards Track                     [Page 7]

RFC 2529         Transmission of IPv6 Packets over IPv4       March 1999APPENDIX A:  IPv4 Multicast Addresses for Neighbor Discovery   The following IPv4 multicast groups are used to support Neighbor   Discovery with this specification. The IPv4 addresses listed in this   section were obtained by looking at the IPv6 multicast addresses that   Neigbour Discovery uses, and deriving the resulting IPv4 "virtual   link-layer" addresses that are generated from them using the   algorithm given inSection 6.   all-nodes multicast address         - the administratively-scoped IPv4 multicast address used to           reach all nodes in the local IPv4 domain supporting this           specification.  239.OLS.0.1   all-routers multicast address         - the administratively-scoped IPv4 multicast address to reach           all routers in the local IPv4 domain supporting this           specification.  239.OLS.0.2   solicited-node multicast address         - an administratively scoped multicast address that is computed           as a function of the solicited target's address by taking the           low-order 24 bits of the IPv4 address used to form the IPv6           address, and prepending the prefix FF02:0:0:0:0:1:FF00::/104           [AARCH]. This is then mapped to the IPv4 multicast address by           the method described in this document. For example, if the           IPv4 address used to form the IPv6 address is W.X.Y.Z, then           the IPv6 solicited node multicast address is           FF02::1:255.X.Y.Z and the corresponding IPv4 multicast           address is 239.OLS.Y.ZCarpenter & Jung            Standards Track                     [Page 8]

RFC 2529         Transmission of IPv6 Packets over IPv4       March 1999Authors' Addresses   Brian E. Carpenter   Internet Division   IBM United Kingdom Laboratories   MP 185, Hursley Park   Winchester, Hampshire S021 2JN, UK   EMail: brian@hursley.ibm.com   Cyndi Jung   3Com Corporation   5400 Bayfront Plaza, Mailstop 3219   Santa Clara, California  95052-8145   EMail: cmj@3Com.comCarpenter & Jung            Standards Track                     [Page 9]

RFC 2529         Transmission of IPv6 Packets over IPv4       March 1999Full Copyright Statement   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999).  All Rights Reserved.   This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to   others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it   or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published   and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any   kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are   included on all such copies and derivative works.  However, this   document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing   the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other   Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of   developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for   copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be   followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than   English.   The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be   revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.   This document and the information contained herein is provided on an   "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING   TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING   BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION   HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF   MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.Carpenter & Jung            Standards Track                    [Page 10]

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp