Cite this RFC:TXT | XML | BibTeX
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC7775
Discuss this RFC: Send questions or comments to the mailing listlsr@ietf.org
Other actions:Submit Errata | Find IPR Disclosures from the IETF | View History of RFC 7775
In existing specifications, the route preferences for IPv4/IPv6Extended Reachability TLVs are not explicitly stated. There are alsoinconsistencies in the definition of how the up/down bit applies toroute preference when the prefix advertisement appears in Level 2Link State Protocol Data Units (LSPs). This document addresses theseissues.
For the definition ofStatus,seeRFC 2026.
For the definition ofStream, seeRFC 8729.