Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Search RFCs

Advanced Search

RFC Editor

RFC 6660

Encoding Three Pre-Congestion Notification (PCN) States in the IP Header Using a Single Diffserv Codepoint (DSCP),July 2012

File formats:
icon for text fileicon for PDFicon for HTML
Status:
PROPOSED STANDARD
Obsoletes:
RFC 5696
Authors:
B. Briscoe
T. Moncaster
M. Menth
Stream:
IETF
Source:
pcn (tsv)

Cite this RFC:TXT  | XML  |  BibTeX

DOI:  https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC6660

Discuss this RFC: Send questions or comments to the mailing listpcn@ietf.org

Other actions:Submit Errata  | Find IPR Disclosures from the IETF  | View History of RFC 6660


Abstract

The objective of Pre-Congestion Notification (PCN) is to protect thequality of service (QoS) of inelastic flows within a Diffserv domain.The overall rate of PCN-traffic is metered on every link in the PCN-domain, and PCN-packets are appropriately marked when certainconfigured rates are exceeded. Egress nodes pass information aboutthese PCN-marks to Decision Points that then decide whether to admitor block new flow requests or to terminate some already admittedflows during serious pre-congestion.

This document specifies how PCN-marks are to be encoded into the IPheader by reusing the Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN)codepoints within a PCN-domain. The PCN wire protocol for non-IPprotocol headers will need to be defined elsewhere. Nonetheless,this document clarifies the PCN encoding for MPLS in an informationalappendix. The encoding for IP provides for up to three different PCNmarking states using a single Diffserv codepoint (DSCP): not-marked(NM), threshold-marked (ThM), and excess-traffic-marked (ETM).Hence, it is called the 3-in-1 PCN encoding. This document obsoletesRFC 5696. [STANDARDS-TRACK]


For the definition ofStatus,seeRFC 2026.

For the definition ofStream, seeRFC 8729.




IABIANAIETFIRTFISEISOCIETF Trust
ReportsPrivacy StatementSite MapContact Us

Advanced Search

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp