Found 4 records.
Errata ID:8073
Status: Reported
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Andy Bierman
Date Reported: 2024-08-11
Section 4 says:
identity configurable-encoding { description "If a transport identity derives from this identity, it means that it supports configurable encodings. An example of a configurable encoding might be a new identity such as
It should say:
identity configurable-encoding { base transport; description "If a transport identity derives from this identity, it means that it supports configurable encodings. An example of a configurable encoding might be a new identity such as
Notes:
This identity is incorrectly located in the section 'identities for encodings'
It is actually an identity for the 'transport' leaf.
The base is missing making it incorrect
(page 44)
Errata ID:8427
Status: Reported
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alex Huang Feng
Date Reported: 2025-05-22
Section 4 says:
uses subscription-policy-modifiable { augment "target/stream" { description "Adds additional objects that can be modified by an RPC."; leaf stream { type stream-ref { require-instance false; } mandatory true; description "Indicates the event stream to be considered for this subscription."; }
It should say:
uses subscription-policy-modifiable { augment "target/stream" { description "Adds additional objects that can be modified by an RPC."; leaf stream { when "/sn:streams/sn:stream"; type stream-ref { require-instance false; } mandatory true; description "Indicates the event stream to be considered for this subscription."; }
Notes:
The mandatory leaf "stream" is an augmentation on "target/stream".
Section 7.17 of RFC7950 states that any augmentation of mandatory leaves need a "when" statement:
If the augmentation adds mandatory nodes (see Section 3) that
represent configuration to a target node in another module, the
augmentation MUST be made conditional with a "when" statement. Care
must be taken when defining the "when" expression so that clients
that do not know about the augmenting module do not break.
Or else, the "mandatory" statement needs to be removed.
Errata ID:6211
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: kent watsen
Date Reported: 2020-06-22
Held for Document Update by: Robert Wilton
Date Held: 2024-01-12
Section 7 says:
A specification for a transport MUST identify any encodings that are supported. If a configured subscription's transport allows different encodings, the specification MUST identify the default encoding.
It should say:
A specification for a transport MUST identify any encodings that are supported. If a configured subscription's transport allows different encodings, the specification MUST identify the default encoding, or provide a mechanism whereby supported encodings can be discovered.
Notes:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/XBpoFqtRynfc0zaRggMEiEMBW2M/
Errata ID:6366
Status: Rejected
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Muly Ilan
Date Reported: 2020-12-24
Rejected by: RFC Editor
Date Rejected: 2021-01-19
Section 4. says:
feature subtree { description "This feature indicates support for YANG subtree filtering."; reference "RFC 6241: Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF), Section 6"; } feature supports-vrf { description "This feature indicates that a publisher supports VRF configuration for configured subscriptions. VRF support for dynamic subscriptions does not require this feature."; reference "RFC 8529: YANG Data Model for Network Instances, Section 6"; }
It should say:
feature subtree { description "This feature indicates support for YANG subtree filtering."; reference "RFC 6241: Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF), Section 6"; } feature supports-vrf { description "This feature indicates that a publisher supports VRF configuration for configured subscriptions. VRF support for dynamic subscriptions does not require this feature."; reference "RFC 8529: YANG Data Model for Network Instances, Section 6"; }
Notes:
In the HTML version the two hyperlinks "Section 6" (for 'subtree' feature and for 'supports-vrf' feature) point to wrong RFCs.
--VERIFIER NOTES--
This is regarding the link generated in the rfc2html output, not the RFC itself (https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8639.txt).