Search RFCs

RFC Editor

Found 3 records.

Status:Held for Document Update (2)

RFC 5654, "Requirements of an MPLS Transport Profile", September 2009

Errata ID:2073
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Eric Gray
Date Reported: 2010-03-12
Held for Document Update by: Adrian Farrel

Section 2.5.4 says:

83  The external controls as defined in [RFC4427] MUST be supported.       A.  External controls overruled by higher priority requests           (e.g., administrative requests and requests due to link/node           failures) or unable to be signaled to the remote end (e.g.,           due to a coordination failure of the protection state) MUST           be dropped.

It should say:

83  The external controls as defined in [RFC4427] MUST be supported.       A.  External controls overruled by higher priority requests           (e.g., administrative requests and requests due to link/node           failures) or unable to be signaled to the remote end (e.g.,           due to a coordination failure of the protection state) MUST           be ignored.

Notes:

Dropping a control is meaningless. The original intent may have been to say "control messages", but this requirement is stated in the section "Management-Plane Operation of Protection and Restoration"

In any case, using "ignored" instead of "dropped" fixes the problem regardless of the original intention.

Errata ID:6434
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Peter Goorts
Date Reported: 2021-02-20
Held for Document Update by: Deborah Brungard
Date Held: 2021-02-26

Section 2.4 says:

52  An MPLS-TP control plane MUST support operation of the recovery       functions described in Section 2.8.

It should say:

52  An MPLS-TP control plane MUST support operation of the recovery       functions described in Section 2.5.

Notes:

There is no section 2.8 in this document. During revision, section changed to 2.5.

Status:Rejected (1)

RFC 5654, "Requirements of an MPLS Transport Profile", September 2009

Errata ID:1953
Status: Rejected
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Zongpeng Du
Date Reported: 2009-12-02
Rejected by: Adrian Farrel
Date Rejected: 2009-12-03

Section 1 says:

Investment in equipment and facilities (Capital Expenditure   (CAPEX)) and Operational Expenditure (OPEX) should be minimized.

It should say:

Investment in equipment and facilities (Capital Expenditure   (CAPEX) and Operational Expenditure (OPEX) should be minimized.

Notes:

An unnecessary parenthesis.
--VERIFIER NOTES--
Orriginal is correct.

Report New Errata