Note: This RFC has been obsoleted byRFC 8881
Note: This RFC has been updated byRFC 8178, RFC 8434
Source of RFC: nfsv4 (wit)Errata ID:4711
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Tom Haynes
Date Reported: 2016-06-16
Verifier Name: Magnus Westerlund
Date Verified: 2020-09-03
Section 15.1.5.5 says:
A stateid with a non-zero seqid value does match the current seqid for the state designated by the user.
It should say:
A stateid with a non-zero seqid value is not the most current seqid for the state.
Notes:
Two issues here:
1) The negation of the fact, i.e., "does not match".
2) The state is not associated with an user.