Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Following system colour schemeSelected dark colour schemeSelected light colour scheme

Python Enhancement Proposals

PEP 222 – Web Library Enhancements

Author:
A.M. Kuchling <amk at amk.ca>
Status:
Deferred
Type:
Standards Track
Created:
18-Aug-2000
Python-Version:
2.1
Post-History:
22-Dec-2000

Table of Contents

Abstract

This PEP proposes a set of enhancements to the CGI developmentfacilities in the Python standard library. Enhancements might benew features, new modules for tasks such as cookie support, orremoval of obsolete code.

The original intent was to make improvements to Python 2.1.However, there seemed little interest from the Python community,and time was lacking, so this PEP has been deferred to some futurePython release.

Open Issues

This section lists changes that have been suggested, but aboutwhich no firm decision has yet been made. In the final version ofthis PEP, this section should be empty, as all the changes shouldbe classified as accepted or rejected.

cgi.py: We should not be told to create our own subclass just sowe can handle file uploads. As a practical matter, I have yet tofind the time to do this right, so I end up reading cgi.py’s tempfile into, at best, another file. Some of our legacy code actuallyreads it into a second temp file, then into a final destination!And even if we did, that would mean creating yet another objectwith its__init__ call and associated overhead.

cgi.py: Currently, query data with no= are ignored. Even ifkeep_blank_values is set, queries like...?value=&... arereturned with blank values but queries like...?value&... arecompletely lost. It would be great if such data were madeavailable through theFieldStorage interface, either as entrieswithNone as values, or in a separate list.

Utility function: build a query string from a list of 2-tuples

Dictionary-related utility classes:NoKeyErrors (returns an emptystring, never aKeyError),PartialStringSubstitution (returnsthe original key string, never aKeyError)

New Modules

This section lists details about entire new packages or modulesthat should be added to the Python standard library.

  • fcgi.py : A new module adding support for the FastCGI protocol.Robin Dunn’s code needs to be ported to Windows, though.

Major Changes to Existing Modules

This section lists details of major changes to existing modules,whether in implementation or in interface. The changes in thissection therefore carry greater degrees of risk, either inintroducing bugs or a backward incompatibility.

The cgi.py module would be deprecated. (XXX A new module orpackage name hasn’t been chosen yet: ‘web’? ‘cgilib’?)

Minor Changes to Existing Modules

This section lists details of minor changes to existing modules.These changes should have relatively small implementations, andhave little risk of introducing incompatibilities with previousversions.

Rejected Changes

The changes listed in this section were proposed for Python 2.1,but were rejected as unsuitable. For each rejected change, arationale is given describing why the change was deemedinappropriate.

  • An HTML generation module is not part of this PEP. Several suchmodules exist, ranging from HTMLgen’s purely programminginterface to ASP-inspired simple templating to DTML’s complextemplating. There’s no indication of which templating module toenshrine in the standard library, and that probably means thatno module should be so chosen.
  • cgi.py: Allowing a combination of query data and POST data.This doesn’t seem to be standard at all, and therefore isdubious practice.

Proposed Interface

XXX open issues: naming convention (studlycaps orunderline-separated?); need to look at thecgi.parse*() functionsand see if they can be simplified, too.

Parsing functions: carry over most of theparse* functions fromcgi.py

# The Response class borrows most of its methods from Zope's# HTTPResponse class.classResponse:"""    Attributes:    status: HTTP status code to return    headers: dictionary of response headers    body: string containing the body of the HTTP response    """def__init__(self,status=200,headers={},body=""):passdefsetStatus(self,status,reason=None):"Set the numeric HTTP response code"passdefsetHeader(self,name,value):"Set an HTTP header"passdefsetBody(self,body):"Set the body of the response"passdefsetCookie(self,name,value,path='/',comment=None,domain=None,max-age=None,expires=None,secure=0):"Set a cookie"passdefexpireCookie(self,name):"Remove a cookie from the user"passdefredirect(self,url):"Redirect the browser to another URL"passdef__str__(self):"Convert entire response to a string"passdefdump(self):"Return a string representation useful for debugging"pass# XXX methods for specific classes of error:serverError,# badRequest, etc.?classRequest:"""    Attributes:    XXX should these be dictionaries, or dictionary-like objects?    .headers : dictionary containing HTTP headers    .cookies : dictionary of cookies    .fields  : data from the form    .env     : environment dictionary    """def__init__(self,environ=os.environ,stdin=sys.stdin,keep_blank_values=1,strict_parsing=0):"""Initialize the request object, using the provided environment        and standard input."""pass# Should people just use the dictionaries directly?defgetHeader(self,name,default=None):passdefgetCookie(self,name,default=None):passdefgetField(self,name,default=None):"Return field's value as a string (even if it's an uploaded file)"passdefgetUploadedFile(self,name):"""Returns a file object that can be read to obtain the contents        of an uploaded file.  XXX should this report an error if the        field isn't actually an uploaded file?  Or should it wrap        a StringIO around simple fields for consistency?        """defgetURL(self,n=0,query_string=0):"""Return the URL of the current request, chopping off 'n' path        components from the right.  Eg. if the URL is        "http://foo.com/bar/baz/quux", n=2 would return        "http://foo.com/bar".  Does not include the query string (if        any)        """defgetBaseURL(self,n=0):"""Return the base URL of the current request, adding 'n' path        components to the end to recreate more of the whole URL.        Eg. if the request URL is        "http://foo.com/q/bar/baz/qux", n=0 would return        "http://foo.com/", and n=2 "http://foo.com/q/bar".        Returned URL does not include the query string, if any.        """defdump(self):"String representation suitable for debugging output"pass# Possibilities?  I don't know if these are worth doing in the# basic objects.defgetBrowser(self):"Returns Mozilla/IE/Lynx/Opera/whatever"defisSecure(self):"Return true if this is an SSLified request"# Module-level functiondefwrapper(func,logfile=sys.stderr):"""    Calls the function 'func', passing it the arguments    (request, response, logfile).  Exceptions are trapped and    sent to the file 'logfile'.    """# This wrapper will detect if it's being called from the command-line,# and if so, it will run in a debugging mode; name=value pairs# can be entered on standard input to set field values.# (XXX how to do file uploads in this syntax?)

Copyright

This document has been placed in the public domain.


Source:https://github.com/python/peps/blob/main/peps/pep-0222.rst

Last modified:2025-02-01 08:59:27 GMT


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp