Evaluating Digital Program Support for the Physical Activity 4 Everyone (PA4E1) School Program: Mixed Methods Study
- PMID:34309565
- PMCID: PMC8367175
- DOI: 10.2196/26690
Evaluating Digital Program Support for the Physical Activity 4 Everyone (PA4E1) School Program: Mixed Methods Study
Abstract
Background: Effectively scaled-up physical activity interventions are urgently needed to address the high prevalence of physical inactivity. To facilitate scale-up of an efficacious school-based physical activity program (Physical Activity 4 Everyone [PA4E1]), provision of implementation support to physical education (PE) teachers was adapted from face-to-face and paper-based delivery modes to partial delivery via a website. A lack of engagement (usage and subjective experience) with digital delivery modes, including websites, may in part explain the typical reduction in effectiveness of scaled-up interventions that use digital delivery modes. A process evaluation focused on the PA4E1 website was undertaken.
Objective: The 2 objectives were to (1) describe the usage of the PA4E1 program website by in-school champions (PE teachers leading the program within their schools) and PE teachers using quantitative methods; (2) examine the usage, subjective experience, and usability of the PA4E1 program website from the perspective of in-school champions using mixed methods.
Methods: The first objective used website usage data collected across all users (n=273) throughout the 9 school terms of the PA4E1 implementation support. The 4 usage measures were sessions, page views, average session duration, and downloads. Descriptive statistics were calculated and explored across the duration of the 26-month program. The second objective used mixed methods, triangulating data from the first objective with data from a think-aloud survey and usability test completed by in-school champions (n=13) at 12 months. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically alongside descriptive statistics from the quantitative data in a triangulation matrix, generating cross-cutting themes using the "following a thread" approach.
Results: For the first objective, in-school champions averaged 48.0 sessions per user, PE teachers 5.8 sessions. PE teacher sessions were of longer duration (10.5 vs 7.6 minutes) and included more page views (5.4 vs 3.4). The results from the mixed methods analysis for the second objective found 9 themes and 2 meta-themes. The first meta-theme indicated that the website was an acceptable and appropriate delivery mode, and usability of the website was high. The second meta-theme found that the website content was acceptable and appropriate, and identified specific suggestions for improvement.
Conclusions: Digital health interventions targeting physical activity often experience issues of lack of user engagement. By contrast, the findings from both the quantitative and mixed methods analyses indicate high usage and overall acceptability and appropriateness of the PA4E1 website to school teachers. The findings support the value of the website within a multidelivery mode implementation intervention to support schools to implement physical activity promoting practices. The analysis identified suggested intervention refinements, which may be adopted for future iterations and further scale-up of the PA4E1 program.
Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12617000681358; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=372870.
Keywords: delivery mode; digital health intervention; engagement; implementation support; mixed methods; physical activity; process evaluation; scale-up; think-aloud methodology; website.
©Matthew Mclaughlin, Jed Duff, Tom McKenzie, Elizabeth Campbell, Rachel Sutherland, John Wiggers, Luke Wolfenden. Originally published in JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting (https://pediatrics.jmir.org), 26.07.2021.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Figures



Similar articles
- Protocol for a mixed methods process evaluation of a hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial of a scaled-up whole-school physical activity program for adolescents: Physical Activity 4 Everyone (PA4E1).Mclaughlin M, Duff J, Sutherland R, Campbell E, Wolfenden L, Wiggers J.Mclaughlin M, et al.Trials. 2020 Mar 17;21(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4187-5.Trials. 2020.PMID:32183902Free PMC article.
- Process Evaluation of a Scaled-Up School-Based Physical Activity Program for Adolescents: Physical Activity 4 Everyone.Mclaughlin M, Duff J, Campbell E, McKenzie T, Davies L, Wolfenden L, Wiggers J, Sutherland R.Mclaughlin M, et al.J Phys Act Health. 2024 Jun 7;21(8):741-755. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2024-0038. Print 2024 Aug 1.J Phys Act Health. 2024.PMID:38849120
- A cluster randomised trial of an intervention to increase the implementation of physical activity practices in secondary schools: study protocol for scaling up the Physical Activity 4 Everyone (PA4E1) program.Sutherland R, Campbell E, Nathan N, Wolfenden L, Lubans DR, Morgan PJ, Gillham K, Oldmeadow C, Searles A, Reeves P, Williams M, Evans N, Bailey A, Morrison R, McLaughlin M, Wiggers J.Sutherland R, et al.BMC Public Health. 2019 Jul 4;19(1):883. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6965-0.BMC Public Health. 2019.PMID:31272421Free PMC article.Clinical Trial.
- Strategies for enhancing the implementation of school-based policies or practices targeting risk factors for chronic disease.Wolfenden L, Nathan NK, Sutherland R, Yoong SL, Hodder RK, Wyse RJ, Delaney T, Grady A, Fielding A, Tzelepis F, Clinton-McHarg T, Parmenter B, Butler P, Wiggers J, Bauman A, Milat A, Booth D, Williams CM.Wolfenden L, et al.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 29;11(11):CD011677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011677.pub2.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017.Update in:Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 29;8:CD011677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011677.pub3.PMID:29185627Free PMC article.Updated.Review.
- Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.Muir D, Orlando C, Newton B.Muir D, et al.Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.Campbell Syst Rev. 2024.PMID:38873396Free PMC article.Review.
Cited by
- Evaluating the scaling up of an effective implementation intervention (PACE) to increase the delivery of a mandatory physical activity policy in primary schools.Hall A, Lane C, Wolfenden L, Wiggers J, Sutherland R, McCarthy N, Jackson R, Shoesmith A, Lecathelinais C, Reeves P, Bauman A, Gillham K, Boyer J, Naylor PJ, Kerr N, Kajons N, Nathan N.Hall A, et al.Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023 Sep 6;20(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01498-y.Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023.PMID:37674213Free PMC article.
References
- Guthold R, Stevens G, Riley L, Bull F. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1·9 million participants. Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Oct;6(10):e1077–e1086. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30357-7.https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2214-109X(18)30357-7 - DOI - PubMed
- Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC. Global trends in insufficient physical activity among adolescents: a pooled analysis of 298 population-based surveys with 1·6 million participants. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 Jan;4(1):23–35. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30323-2.https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2352-4642(19)30323-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
- Global Action Plan on Physical Activity 2018-2030: More Active People for a Healthier World. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. [2021-07-20].https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/272722/9789241514187-en....
- McCrabb S, Lane C, Hall A, Milat A, Bauman A, Sutherland R, Yoong S, Wolfenden L. Scaling-up evidence-based obesity interventions: A systematic review assessing intervention adaptations and effectiveness and quantifying the scale-up penalty. Obes Rev. 2019 Jul 13;20(7):964–982. doi: 10.1111/obr.12845. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources