Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Wiley full text link Wiley Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

.2020 Sep;98(3):668-699.
doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12469. Epub 2020 Aug 4.

US State Policies, Politics, and Life Expectancy

Affiliations

US State Policies, Politics, and Life Expectancy

Jennifer Karas Montez et al. Milbank Q.2020 Sep.

Abstract

Policy Points Changes in US state policies since the 1970s, particularly after 2010, have played an important role in the stagnation and recent decline in US life expectancy. Some US state policies appear to be key levers for improving life expectancy, such as policies on tobacco, labor, immigration, civil rights, and the environment. US life expectancy is estimated to be 2.8 years longer among women and 2.1 years longer among men if all US states enjoyed the health advantages of states with more liberal policies, which would put US life expectancy on par with other high-income countries.

Context: Life expectancy in the United States has increased little in previous decades, declined in recent years, and become more unequal across US states. Those trends were accompanied by substantial changes in the US policy environment, particularly at the state level. State policies affect nearly every aspect of people's lives, including economic well-being, social relationships, education, housing, lifestyles, and access to medical care. This study examines the extent to which the state policy environment may have contributed to the troubling trends in US life expectancy.

Methods: We merged annual data on life expectancy for US states from 1970 to 2014 with annual data on 18 state-level policy domains such as tobacco, environment, tax, and labor. Using the 45 years of data and controlling for differences in the characteristics of states and their populations, we modeled the association between state policies and life expectancy, and assessed how changes in those policies may have contributed to trends in US life expectancy from 1970 through 2014.

Findings: Results show that changes in life expectancy during 1970-2014 were associated with changes in state policies on a conservative-liberal continuum, where more liberal policies expand economic regulations and protect marginalized groups. States that implemented more conservative policies were more likely to experience a reduction in life expectancy. We estimated that the shallow upward trend in US life expectancy from 2010 to 2014 would have been 25% steeper for women and 13% steeper for men had state policies not changed as they did. We also estimated that US life expectancy would be 2.8 years longer among women and 2.1 years longer among men if all states enjoyed the health advantages of states with more liberal policies.

Conclusions: Understanding and reversing the troubling trends and growing inequalities in US life expectancy requires attention to US state policy contexts, their dynamic changes in recent decades, and the forces behind those changes. Changes in US political and policy contexts since the 1970s may undergird the deterioration of Americans' health and longevity.

Keywords: US state policies; health disparities; life expectancy; social determinants of health.

© 2020 The Authors. The Milbank Quarterly published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Millbank Memorial Fund.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trends in Life Expectancy by US State, 1959–2017 [Color figure can be viewed atwileyonlinelibrary.com] Data from the United States Mortality Database.17
Figure 2
Figure 2
Change in US States’ Overall Policy Orientation Between 1970 and 2014 [Color figure can be viewed atwileyonlinelibrary.com] Data are from Grumbach,21 who assigned an overall policy liberalism score for each state in each calendar year and then normalized the scores across all state‐year observations to a 0‐1 scale reflecting a conservative‐liberal continuum. The start of each arrow represents the 1970 score, while the arrowhead represents the 2014 score.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Range in Policy Orientation and Life Expectancy Across US States, 1970–2014 State policy scores are from Grumbach,21 and state life expectancy data are from the United States Mortality Database.17 The range in life expectancy in each calendar year is the difference between the state with the highest life expectancy and the state with the lowest life expectancy. The range in policy orientation in each calendar year is the difference between the state with the maximum policy liberalism score and the state with the minimum policy liberalism score.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Estimated Difference in Female Life Expectancy Within a US State When a Policy's Liberalism Score Is 1 vs. 0 [Color figure can be viewed atwileyonlinelibrary.com] Estimates are from authors’ analysis using state policy scores from Grumbach21 and state life expectancy from the United States Mortality Database.17 Horizontal spikes are 95% confidence intervals. Full model results are provided in the online appendix Table A1, Models 1 and 5.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Estimated Difference in Male Life Expectancy Within a US State When a Policy's Liberalism Score Is 1 vs. 0 [Color figure can be viewed atwileyonlinelibrary.com] Estimates are from authors’ analysis using state policy scores from Grumbach21 and state life expectancy from the United States Mortality Database.17 Horizontal spikes are 95% confidence intervals. Full model results are provided in the online appendix Table A3, Models 1 and 5.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. National Research Council . Explaining Divergent Levels of Longevity in High‐Income Countries. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011. - PubMed
    1. Ho JY, Hendi AS. Recent trends in life expectancy across high income countries: retrospective observational study. BMJ. 2018;362:k2562 - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Research Council . US Health in International Perspective: Shorter Lives, Poorer Health. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2013. - PubMed
    1. Avendano M, Kawachi I. Why do Americans have shorter life expectancy and worse health than do people in other high‐income countries? Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:307‐325. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Banks J, Marmot M, Oldfield Z, Smith JP. Disease and disadvantage in the United States and in England. JAMA. 2006;295(17):2037‐2045. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Wiley full text link Wiley Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp