Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Atypon full text link Atypon Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

Share

.2019 Sep 6;365(6457):eaat7487.
doi: 10.1126/science.aat7487.

The formation of human populations in South and Central Asia

Vagheesh M Narasimhan  1Nick Patterson  2  3Priya Moorjani  4  5Nadin Rohland  6  7Rebecca Bernardos  6Swapan Mallick  6  7  8Iosif Lazaridis  6Nathan Nakatsuka  6  9Iñigo Olalde  6Mark Lipson  6Alexander M Kim  6  10Luca M Olivieri  11Alfredo Coppa  12Massimo Vidale  11  13James Mallory  14Vyacheslav Moiseyev  15Egor Kitov  16  17  18Janet Monge  19Nicole Adamski  6  8Neel Alex  20Nasreen Broomandkhoshbacht  6  8Francesca Candilio  21  22Kimberly Callan  6  8Olivia Cheronet  21  23  24Brendan J Culleton  25Matthew Ferry  6  8Daniel Fernandes  21  23  24  26Suzanne Freilich  24Beatriz Gamarra  21  23  27Daniel Gaudio  21  23Mateja Hajdinjak  28Éadaoin Harney  6  8  29Thomas K Harper  30Denise Keating  21Ann Marie Lawson  6  8Matthew Mah  6  7  8Kirsten Mandl  24Megan Michel  6  8Mario Novak  21  31Jonas Oppenheimer  6  8Niraj Rai  32  33Kendra Sirak  6  21  34Viviane Slon  28Kristin Stewardson  6  8Fatma Zalzala  6  8Zhao Zhang  6Gaziz Akhatov  17Anatoly N Bagashev  35Alessandra Bagnera  11Bauryzhan Baitanayev  17Julio Bendezu-Sarmiento  36Arman A Bissembaev  17  37Gian Luca Bonora  38Temirlan T Chargynov  39Tatiana Chikisheva  40Petr K Dashkovskiy  41Anatoly Derevianko  40Miroslav Dobeš  42Katerina Douka  43  44Nadezhda Dubova  16Meiram N Duisengali  37Dmitry Enshin  35Andrey Epimakhov  45  46Alexey V Fribus  47Dorian Fuller  48  49Alexander Goryachev  35Andrey Gromov  15Sergey P Grushin  50Bryan Hanks  51Margaret Judd  51Erlan Kazizov  17Aleksander Khokhlov  52Aleksander P Krygin  53Elena Kupriyanova  54Pavel Kuznetsov  52Donata Luiselli  55Farhod Maksudov  56Aslan M Mamedov  57Talgat B Mamirov  17Christopher Meiklejohn  58Deborah C Merrett  59Roberto Micheli  11  60Oleg Mochalov  52Samariddin Mustafokulov  56  61Ayushi Nayak  43Davide Pettener  62Richard Potts  63Dmitry Razhev  35Marina Rykun  64Stefania Sarno  62Tatyana M Savenkova  65Kulyan Sikhymbaeva  66Sergey M Slepchenko  35Oroz A Soltobaev  39Nadezhda Stepanova  40Svetlana Svyatko  15  67Kubatbek Tabaldiev  68Maria Teschler-Nicola  24  69Alexey A Tishkin  70Vitaly V Tkachev  71Sergey Vasilyev  16  72Petr Velemínský  73Dmitriy Voyakin  17  74Antonina Yermolayeva  17Muhammad Zahir  43  75Valery S Zubkov  76Alisa Zubova  15Vasant S Shinde  77Carles Lalueza-Fox  78Matthias Meyer  28David Anthony  79Nicole Boivin  43Kumarasamy Thangaraj  32Douglas J Kennett  25  30  80Michael Frachetti  81  82Ron Pinhasi  83  24David Reich  1  7  8  84
Affiliations

The formation of human populations in South and Central Asia

Vagheesh M Narasimhan et al. Science..

Abstract

By sequencing 523 ancient humans, we show that the primary source of ancestry in modern South Asians is a prehistoric genetic gradient between people related to early hunter-gatherers of Iran and Southeast Asia. After the Indus Valley Civilization's decline, its people mixed with individuals in the southeast to form one of the two main ancestral populations of South Asia, whose direct descendants live in southern India. Simultaneously, they mixed with descendants of Steppe pastoralists who, starting around 4000 years ago, spread via Central Asia to form the other main ancestral population. The Steppe ancestry in South Asia has the same profile as that in Bronze Age Eastern Europe, tracking a movement of people that affected both regions and that likely spread the distinctive features shared between Indo-Iranian and Balto-Slavic languages.

Copyright © 2019 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Overview of ancient DNA data.
(A) Distribution of sites and associated archeological or radiocarbon dates along with the number of individuals meeting our analysis thresholds from each site. (B) Locations of ancient individuals for whom we generated ancient DNA that passed our analysis thresholds along with the locations of individuals from 140 groups from present-day South Asia that we analyzed as forming theModern Indian Cline. Shapes distinguish the individuals from different sites. Data from 106 South Asian groups that do not fit along theModern Indian Cline as well asAHG are not shown.(C) PCA analysis of ancient and modern individuals projected onto a basis formed by 1,340 present day Eurasians reflects clustering of individuals that mirrors their geographical relationships. An interactive version of this figure is presented in the Online Data Visualizer.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.. Outlier analysis reveals ancient contacts between sites.
We plot the average of Principal Component 1 (x-axis) and Principal Component 2 (y-axis) for the West Eurasian and All Eurasian PCA plots, as we found that this aids visual separation of the ancestry profiles. (A) In the Middle to Late Bronze Age Steppe, we observe in addition to theWestern_Steppe_MLBA andCentral_Steppe_MLBA clusters (indistinguishable in this projection), outliers admixed with other ancestries. TheBMAC-related admixture in Kazakhstan documents northward gene flow onto the Steppe and confirms the Inner Asian Mountain Corridor as a conduit for movement of people.(B) At Shahr-i-Sokhta in eastern Iran, there are two primary groupings: one with ~20% Anatolian farmer-related ancestry and no detectableAHG-related ancestry, and the other with ~0% Anatolian farmer-related ancestry and substantialAHG-related ancestry (Indus Periphery Cline). (C) In individuals of the BMAC and successor sites, we observe a main cluster as well as numerous outliers: outliers >2000 BCE with admixture related toWSHG, outliers >2000 BCE on theIndus Periphery Cline (with an ancestral similar similar to the outliers at Shahr-i-Sokhta), and outliers after 2000 BCE that reveal howCentral_Steppe_MLBA ancestry had arrived.(D) In the Late Bronze Age and Iron Age of northernmost South Asia, we observe a main cluster consistent with admixture between peoples of theIndus Periphery Cline andCentral_Steppe_MLBA, and variable Steppe pastoralist-related admixture.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.. Ancestry Transformations in Holocene Eurasia.
(A) Ancestry clines before and after the advent of farming. We document aSouth Eurasian Early Holocene Cline of increasing Iranian farmer- and West Siberian hunter-gatherer related ancestry moving west-to-east from Anatolia to Iran, and aNorth Eurasian Early Holocene Cline of increasing relatedness to East Asians moving west-to-east from Europe to Siberia. Mixtures of peoples along these two clines following the spread of farming formed five later gradients (shaded): moving west-to-east: theEuropean Cline, theCaucasus Cline from which the Yamnaya formed, theCentral Asian Cline which characterized much of Central Asia in the Copper and Bronze Ages, theSouthwest Asian Cline established by spreads of farmers in multiple directions from several loci of domestication, and theIndus Periphery Cline.(B) Following the appearance of the Yamnaya Steppe pastoralists,Western_Steppe_EMBA (Yamnaya-like) ancestry then spread across this vast region. We use arrows to show plausible directions of spread of increasingly diluted ancestry (the arrows are not meant as exact routes which we do not have enough sampling to determine at present). Rough estimates of the timing of the arrival of this ancestry and estimated ancestry proportions are shown.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.. The Genomic Formation of South Asia.
(A) The degree of allele sharing with southern Asian hunter-gatherers (AASI) measured byf4(Ethiopia_4500BP, X; Ganj_Dareh_N,AHG) and with Steppe pastoralists measured byf4(Ethiopia_4500BP, X; Central_Steppe_MLBA, Ganj_Dareh_N) reveals three ancestry clines that succeeded each other in time: theIndus Periphery Cline prior to ~2000 BCE, theSteppe Cline represented by northern South Asian individuals after ~2000 BCE, and theModern Indian Cline.(B) Modeling South Asians as a mixture ofCentral_Steppe_MLBA, AHG (as a proxy forAASI), andIndus_Periphery_West (the individual from theIndus Periphery Cline with the leastAASI ancestry). Groups along the edges of the triangle fit a two-way model, and in the interior only fit a three-way model. The 140 present-day South Asian groups on theModern Indian Cline are shown as small dots. (C) Groups that traditionally view themselves as being of priestly status in this and the preceding panel are shown in red (“Brahmin,” “Pandit,” and “Bhumihar” but excluding “Catholic Brahmins”), and tend to have a significantly higher ratio ofCentral_Steppe_MLBA toIndus_Periphery_Cline ancestry than other groups. (D) Plot of the proportion ofCentral_Steppe_MLBA ancestry on the autosomes (x-axis) and the Y chromosome (y-axis) shows that the source of this ancestry is primarily from females in Late Bronze Age and Iron Age individuals from the Swat District of northernmost South Asia, and primarily from males in most present-day South Asians.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.. Admixture Graph Model.
The largest deviation between empirical and theoreticalf-statistics is |Z|=2.9, indicating a good fit considering the large number off-statistics analyzed. Admixture events are shown as dotted lines labeled by proportions, with the minor ancestry in gray. The present-day groups are shown in orange ovals, the ancient ones in blue, and unsampled groups in white. (The ovals and admixture events are positioned according to guesses about their relative dates to help in visualization, although the dates are in no way meant to be exact.) In this graph we do not attempt to model the contribution ofWSHG and Anatolian farmer-related ancestry, and thus cannot modelCentral_Steppe_EMBA, the proximal source of Steppe ancestry in South Asia (instead we model the Steppe ancestry in South Asia through the more distally relatedYamnaya). However, the admixture graph does highlight several key findings of the study, including the deep separation of theAASI from other Eurasian lineages, and the fact that some Austroasiatic-speaking groups in South Asia (e.g. Juang) harbor ancestry from a South Asian group with a higher ratio ofAASI-related to Iranian farmer-related ancestry than any groups on theModern Indian Cline, thus revealing that groups with substantial Iranian farmer-related ancestry were not ubiquitous in peninsular South Asia in the 3rd millennium BCE when Austroasiatic languages likely spread across the subcontinent.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Online Data Visualizer, (available athttps://public.tableau.com/views/TheGenomicFormationofSouthandCentralAsi...).
    1. Fuller DQ, Lucas L, in Human Dispersal and Species Movement, Boivin N, Petraglia M, Crassard R, Eds. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017), pp. 304–331.
    1. Stevens CJ et al., Between China and South Asia: A Middle Asian corridor of crop dispersal and agricultural innovation in the Bronze Age. The Holocene. 26, 1541–1555 (2016). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allaby RG, Stevens C, Lucas L, Maeda O, Fuller DQ, Geographic mosaics and changing rates of cereal domestication. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci 372, 20160429 (2017). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dani AH et al., History of Civilizations of Central Asia: The Development of Sedentary and Nomadic Civilizations, 700 B. C. to A (UNESCO Publishing, 1994).

Publication types

MeSH terms

Related information

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Atypon full text link Atypon Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp