[Selection of appropriate antimicrobial agents to test and report by clinical microbiology laboratories]
- PMID:12451681
[Selection of appropriate antimicrobial agents to test and report by clinical microbiology laboratories]
Abstract
Clinical microbiology laboratories in Japan have not yet established standards for selecting the most appropriate antimicrobial agents for testing and reporting antimicrobial susceptibility that are comparable to the performance standards of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards(NCCLS) in the United States of America. Selection of the most appropriate antimicrobial agents for testing and reporting was discussed by a working group(WG) consisting of medical physicians, surgeons, pharmacists, medical technologists and medical microbiologists. The WG agreed on the following basic criteria for the selection of antimicrobial agents: 1) the agent should be useful when screening various resistant bacteria, 2) the agent should serve as a useful guide for physicians and residents when selecting antimicrobial agents, and 3) the agent should be useful for controlling nosocomial infections and resistant bacteria. Clinically isolated microorganisms were classified into 7 groups based on susceptibility to antimicrobial agents. These groups were Staphylococcus spp. or Enterococcus spp., Streptococcus spp. or Haemophilus spp., enterobacteriae, glucose non-fermenting gram positive rods(NFRs), anaerobic bacteria, fungi and mycobacterium. After considering clinical and bacteriological evidence, the WG decided on several antimicrobial agents for testing in clinical microbiology laboratories in Jichi Medical School Hospital. For the NFR group, these were Piperacillin(PIPC), ceftazidime(CAZ), cefepime, imipenem, amikacin and levofloxacin(LVFX). For the enterobacteriae group, these were Amplicillin(ABPC), PIPC, aztreonam, CAZ and LVFX. For the Staphylococcus spp. or Enterococcus spp. group, these were oxacillin, ABPC, vancomycin and gentamicin. We concluded that the most appropriate antimicrobial agent for testing and reporting must be economical and agreed upon at the hospital level, although the ultimate selection must be based on the available clinical and bacteriological evidence.
Similar articles
- Comparison of in vitro activities of levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, cefepime, imipenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam against aerobic bacterial pathogens from patients with nosocomial infections.Huang SS, Lee SC, Lee N, See LC, Tsai MH, Shieh WB.Huang SS, et al.J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2007 Apr;40(2):134-40.J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2007.PMID:17446961
- [Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance among nosocomial gram-negative pathogens from 15 teaching hospitals in China in 2005].Yang QW, Xu YC, Chen MJ, Hu YJ, Ni YX, Sun JY, Yu YS, Kong HS, He L, Wu WY, Ye HF, Yang YM, Zhu LN, Guo SH, Ji P, Zhu ZH, Ren JK, Zhang LX, Sun ZY, Zhu XH, Tong MQ, Zhao WS, Mei YN, Liu Y, Zhang ZJ, Duan Q, Li D, Liu PP, Wang J, Han LX, Wang H, Xie XL.Yang QW, et al.Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2007 Oct 23;87(39):2753-8.Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2007.PMID:18167265Chinese.
- Contemporary activity of meropenem and comparator broad-spectrum agents: MYSTIC program report from the United States component (2005).Rhomberg PR, Jones RN.Rhomberg PR, et al.Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007 Feb;57(2):207-15. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.07.009. Epub 2006 Sep 1.Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007.PMID:16949243
- Antimicrobial susceptibility of uncommonly isolated non-enteric Gram-negative bacilli.Sader HS, Jones RN.Sader HS, et al.Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2005 Feb;25(2):95-109. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2004.10.002.Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2005.PMID:15664479Review.
- In vitro testing of antimicrobial agents.Woods GL.Woods GL.Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1995 Sep;9(3):463-81.Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1995.PMID:7490428Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Related information
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous