
Altered functional connectivity between sub-regions in the thalamus and cortex in schizophrenia patients measured by resting state BOLD fMRI at 7T
Jun Hua
Nicholas IS Blair
Adrian Paez
Ann Choe
Anita D Barber
Allison Brandt
Issel Anne L Lim
Feng Xu
Vidyulata Kamath
James J Pekar
Peter C M van Zijl
Christopher A Ross
Russell L Margolis
Contributors
Jun Hua conducted data collection, data analysis and interpretation, drafting of the article, revision of the article, and final approval.
Nicholas I.S. Blair conducted the functional MRI data analysis.
Adrian Paez contributed to data analysis and revision of the article.
Ann Choe contributed to data interpretation and revision of the article.
Anita D. Barber contributed to data interpretation and revision of the article.
Allison Brandt contributed to the collection and analysis of the clinical data, and revision of the article.
Issel Anne L. Lim contributed to data collection.
Feng Xu contributed to data interpretation and revision of the article.
Vidyulata Kamath contributed to data interpretation and revision of the article.
James J. Pekar contributed to study design, data interpretation and revision of the article.
Peter C.M. van Zijl contributed to study design, data interpretation, and revision of the article.
Christopher A. Ross contributed to study design, data interpretation, and revision of the article.
Russell L. Margolis contributed to study design, data analysis and interpretation, drafting of the article, revision of the article, and final approval.
Corresponding Author: Jun Hua, Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, F.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, 707 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205,jhua@mri.jhu.edu; Tel: 443-923-3848; Fax: 443-923-9505
Issue date 2019 Apr.
Abstract
The thalamus is a small brain structure that relays neuronal signals between subcortical and cortical regions. Abnormal thalamocortical connectivity in schizophrenia has been reported in previous studies using blood-oxygenation-level-dependent (BOLD) functional MRI (fMRI) performed at 3T. However, anatomically the thalamus is not a single entity, but is subdivided into multiple distinct nuclei with different connections to various cortical regions. We sought to determine the potential benefit of using the enhanced sensitivity of BOLD fMRI at ultra-high magnetic field (7T) in exploring thalamo-cortical connectivity in schizophrenia based on subregions in the thalamus. Seeds placed in thalamic subregions of 14 patients and 14 matched controls were used to calculate whole-brain functional connectivity. Our results demonstrate impaired thalamic connectivity to the prefrontal cortex and the cerebellum, but enhanced thalamic connectivity to the motor/sensory cortex in schizophrenia. This altered functional connectivity significantly correlated with disease duration in the patients. Remarkably, comparable effect sizes observed in previous 3T studies were detected in the current 7T study with a heterogeneous and much smaller cohort, providing evidence that ultra-high field fMRI may be a powerful tool for measuring functional connectivity abnormalities in schizophrenia. Further investigation with a larger cohort is merited to validate the current findings.
Keywords: Imaging, biomarker, high field, psychosis, thalamus
1. Introduction
The thalamus is an important deep gray matter structure that relays information between subcortical and cortical regions. Altered thalamocortical connectivity has been reported in schizophrenia (SCZ) (Anticevic et al., 2014;Anticevic et al., 2015;Cetin et al., 2014;Klingner et al., 2014). The thalamus can be subdivided into multiple distinct nuclei with different anatomical connections to various cortical regions (Behrens et al., 2003a;Behrens et al., 2003b). To better assess the relationship between schizophrenia and thalamocortical connectivity, it is therefore critical to investigate the functional connectivity between sub-regions in the thalamus and the cortex, rather than averaging connectivity across the entire thalamus. Indeed, findings using 3.0 Tesla (3T) MRI support a differential connectivity between specific subregions and the cortex (Anticevic et al., 2014;Anticevic et al., 2015). As the sensitivity of blood-oxygenation-level dependent (BOLD) functional MRI (fMRI) is expected to show a supra-linear enhancement with field strength (Uludag et al., 2009), ultra-high field (7.0 Tesla, or 7T, and beyond) BOLD fMRI provides a powerful tool for the investigation of the functional connectivity of these small sub-thalamic regions, potentially using much smaller sample sizes than are needed at 3T. Here, we test this hypothesis by using resting state BOLD fMRI at 7T in a group of schizophrenia patients and matched controls to measure functional connectivity between sub-regions in the thalamus defined by the Oxford thalamic connectivity atlas (Behrens et al., 2003a;Behrens et al., 2003b) and the whole brain on a voxel-by-voxel basis.
2. Methods
2.1. Participants
Fourteen patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia (n = 12) or schizoaffective (n = 2) disorder and fourteen age and sex matched normal controls were recruited and scanned following a Johns Hopkins Medicine Institutional Review Board approved protocol. All participants gave written informed consent before scanning. None of the subjects had other neurologic history or neurological signs on exam, or a history of vascular diseases. As tobacco smoking could potentially affect baseline brain perfusion and thus the BOLD effect, current smoking status (cigarettes smoked per day) was determined for patients and controls. Current schizophrenia symptom severity was assessed with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) (Overall and Gorham, 1962). Diagnosis was based on clinical records and clinical referrals at the point of ascertainment, and was confirmed by symptom evaluation on entry into the study. All patients, but none of the controls, were receiving antipsychotic medicines. Current chlorpromazine (CPZ) equivalents (Andreasen et al., 2010) were used as a proxy for lifetime antipsychotic exposure. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (Nasreddine et al., 2005) was performed on each participant on the day of scanning.
2.2. MRI
All scans were performed on a 7T Philips MRI scanner (Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands). A 32-channel phased-array head coil (Nova Medical, Wilmington, MA) was used for RF reception and a head-only quadrature coil for transmit. High-resolution anatomical images were acquired with a 3D magnetization prepared 2 rapid acquisition gradient echoes (MP2RAGE) sequence (Marques et al., 2009;Van de Moortele et al., 2009) (voxel = 0.65 mm isotropic) to minimize B1 field inhomogeneity induced artifacts at 7T. A resting state fMRI scan was performed with gradient echo (GRE) echo-planar imaging (EPI) (TR/TE/FA=2000/22ms/60°, voxel=2.5mm isotropic, 54 slices, 7 minutes) for each participant.
2.3. Data analysis
The statistical parametric mapping (SPM) software package (Version 8, Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, London, United Kingdom;http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/) and in-house code programmed in Matlab (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA) were used for image analysis. Preprocessing included realignment, slice time correction, co-registration, segmentation, normalization; nuisance removal (CompCor)(Muschelli et al., 2014), regression of global mean and motion parameters (6 rigid body motion correction parameters computed from the SPM realignment routine, and the first derivative of each parameter); and temporal filtering (0.01–0.1Hz). Given the emerging concerns that micro movements can affect between group differences in functional connectivity data even after standard motion correction procedures (Power et al., 2012;Satterthwaite et al., 2012;Van Dijk et al., 2012), we applied an additional “scrubbing” procedure described in previous works (Muschelli et al., 2014;Power et al., 2012). Briefly, the 6 rigid body motion correction parameters were converted into the Framewise Displacement (FD) (Power et al., 2012) by summing the absolute value of the 3 differenced translational parameters and the 3 differenced rotational parameters. An FD threshold of .5 mm was used to identify potentially motion-contaminated scans, and one scan before and 2 scans after each of these scans above the FD threshold were excluded from further analysis. All analysis was also repeated without the global signal regression (GSR) step.
To perform seed-based functional connectivity analysis between sub-thalamic regions and the brain, the Oxford thalamic connectivity atlas(Behrens et al., 2003a;Behrens et al., 2003b) was employed. This atlas was generated using diffusion based structural connectivity in white matter between the thalamus and cortex, which segments the thalamus into seven sub-regions, with >25% probability of connection to seven exclusive cortical areas, respectively (Figure 1). Seed-based analysis was carried out using each thalamic sub-region as a seed, and whole brain connectivity maps (z values) to each seed were calculated. Second-level t-tests were performed to examine differential connectivity between schizophrenia patients and controls in the whole brain. Age, sex, smoking status, regional gray matter volume from anatomical scans, motion and differential motion parameters were all accounted for as covariates in the analysis. Significant clusters of decreased or increased thalamic connectivity were identified using threshold-free cluster enhancement (Smith and Nichols, 2009). The IBASPM116 atlas (Lancaster et al., 1997;Lancaster et al., 2000;Maldjian et al., 2004;Maldjian et al., 2003;Tzourio-Mazoyer et al., 2002) (PickAtlas software, Wake Forest University, North Carolina, USA) was used to identify anatomical regions within the significant clusters (note that an anatomical region from the atlas may have both decreased or increased connectivity clusters in its sub-regions). Effect size was estimated with Cohen’s d. Correlations between thalamic connectivity and disease duration, antipsychotic medication dosage, BPRS and MoCA scores (including the total score and subscales for both BPRS and MoCA) were evaluated using adjusted R2 from linear regression. Note that for correlations between thalamic connectivity and disease duration, BPRS and MoCA scores, partial correlations were calculated with age, smoking status and medication dosage as covariates. Multiple comparisons in the correlation analysis (functional connectivity between the thalamus and multiple cortical regions) were corrected for with the false-discovery rate (adjusted P < 0.05)(Rosner, 2011).
Figure 1.

Oxford thalamic connectivity atlas. The thalamus is segmented into seven sub-regions based on white matter diffusion tractography. Each sub-region has a primary connection to a cortical area as listed in the Figure.
3. Results
Demographic information and clinical measures are shown inTable 1. Age and sex were matched between schizophrenia patients and control subjects (P > 0.1). The average numbers of cigarettes smoked per day were comparable between the two groups. Schizophrenia patients had significantly higher BPRS scores (P < 0.001), and slightly lower total MoCA scores (P < 0.05) compared to control subjects. No significant differences were found in motion parameters derived from the SPM realignment routine between the two groups (data not shown).
Table 1.
Demographic and clinical data for the study participants.
| Control subjects | Schizophrenia patients | P valuea | |
|---|---|---|---|
| N | 14 | 14 | N/A |
| Sex (Male) | 75% | 75% | 1 |
| Race (Caucasian/African American) | 7/7 | 7/7 | 1 |
| Age (year) | 37.3±16.7b | 39.5±18.5 | 0.71 |
| Disease duration (year) | N/A | 19.1±17.7 | N/A |
| Smoking status (cig/day) | 1.7±3.1 | 2.3±2.4 | 0.55 |
| BPRS scorec | 23.1±3.4 | 38.1±8.4 | <0.00001 |
| Medicationd | N/A | 93.9±130.7 | N/A |
| MoCAescore | 25.5±3.0 | 22.8±3.8 | 0.04 |
P values from two-sample t-tests between the two groups for age, smoking status, BPRS and MoCA scores; or from χ2-test for the categorical variable sex.
mean ± standard deviation
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS); please see Methods section for references.
Medication reported with derived chlorpromazine equivalent dose in dose-year (milligram). More detailed information about medication doses and types are reported inSupplemental Table S1. Current chlorpromazine (CPZ) equivalents (Andreasen et al., 2010) were used as a proxy for lifetime antipsychotic exposure.
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA); please see Methods section for references.
Tables 2 and3 summarize the main findings in the group comparisons. Hyper-connectivity (Table 2) and hypo-connectivity (Table 3) between thalamic sub-regions and various cortical areas were detected in schizophrenia patients compared to controls, which include both primary targets and other regions (non-primary, shaded inTables 2 and3) of each seed. Hyper-connectivity was observed between all thalamic sub-regions and the sensory/motor cortex and the temporal cortex. Hyper-connectivity to some regions in the parietal cortex was also detected from several thalamic sub-regions. Hypo-connectivity in schizophrenia patients was found between thalamic sub-regions and the frontal cortex, the cingulate cortex, the caudate and putamen, and the cerebellum. Most of these changes were detected in both hemispheres in corresponding regions, although the cluster sizes varied between the left and right hemispheres in some regions.Figure 2 displays the regions with significantly decreased or increased thalamic functional connectivity in schizophrenia patients compared to controls on MNI normalized anatomical images (significant regions from each sub-thalamic seed combined on the same figure).
Table 2.
Hyper-connectivity (schizophrenia > control) between thalamic sub-regions and various brain regions in schizophrenia patients compared to controls.
| Functional connectivity (z) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| schizophrenia | control | Cluster Peakd(mm, MNI) | ||||||||||
| Regiona | Hemisphere | Cluster Sizeb | mean | std | mean | std | Effect Sizec | X | V | z | Peak T | Adjusted P Value |
| Sub-region 1 (connection to primary motor) | ||||||||||||
| Precentral | R | 120 | 0.096 | 0.059 | −0.046 | 0.077 | 2.15 | −42 | −8 | 46 | 5.03 | le-5 |
| Precentral | L | 97 | 0.043 | 0.036 | −0.062 | 0.057 | 2.29 | 34 | −4 | 50 | 4.47 | 0.001 |
| Paracentral_Lobule | L | 60 | 0.082 | 0.065 | −0.047 | 0.066 | 2.04 | 10 | −30 | 62 | 4.36 | 0.004 |
| Panetal_Sup | L | 50 | 0.016 | 0.063 | −0.066 | 0.056 | 1.43 | 24 | −64 | 48 | 5.44 | 0.001 |
| Postcentral | R | 140 | 0.069 | 0.054 | −0.056 | 0.075 | 1.99 | −38 | −30 | 50 | 4.83 | le-5 |
| Postcentral | L | 112 | 0.055 | 0.042 | −0.063 | 0.055 | 2.50 | 22 | −46 | 56 | 5.01 | 0.007 |
| Precuneus | L | 55 | 0.043 | 0.035 | −0.059 | 0.043 | 2.70 | 6 | −64 | 54 | 4.53 | 0.002 |
| Supp_Motor_Area | R | 71 | 0.092 | 0.063 | −0.041 | 0.055 | 2.33 | −8 | −22 | 62 | 4.02 | le-5 |
| Supp_Motor_Area | L | 87 | 0.100 | 0.066 | −0.035 | 0.066 | 2.12 | 8 | −16 | 56 | 5.07 | 0.003 |
| Temporal Mid | R | 95 | 0.036 | 0.064 | −0.093 | 0.051 | 2.31 | −42 | −66 | 0 | 4.50 | 0.007 |
| Tempo ral_Su P | R | 82 | 0.053 | 0.045 | −0.043 | 0.075 | 1.61 | −52 | −36 | 8 | 5.08 | 0.001 |
| Sub-region 2 ( connection to sensory) | ||||||||||||
| Postcentral | R | 150 | 0.072 | 0.054 | −0.055 | 0.069 | 2.13 | −52 | −8 | 36 | 5.25 | 0.001 |
| Postcentral | L | 194 | 0.048 | 0.041 | −0.070 | 0.067 | 2.20 | 50 | −10 | 20 | 4.71 | le-5 |
| SupraMargina 1 | R | 23 | 0.054 | 0.063 | −0.051 | 0.065 | 1.70 | −38 | −32 | 40 | 3.93 | le-5 |
| SupraMargina 1 | L | 52 | 0.029 | 0.027 | −0.048 | 0.062 | 1.67 | 52 | −26 | 14 | 4.05 | 0.002 |
| Paracentral_Lobule | L | 74 | 0.073 | 0.058 | −0.053 | 0.073 | 1.98 | 10 | −30 | 60 | 5.71 | 0.009 |
| Precentral | R | 170 | 0.100 | 0.065 | −0.047 | 0.082 | 2.06 | −42 | 4 | 30 | 4.66 | 0.005 |
| Precentral | L | 130 | 0.036 | 0.033 | −0.062 | 0.065 | 1.97 | 52 | 4 | 28 | 4.86 | 0.001 |
| Supp_Motor_Area | R | 161 | 0.090 | 0.058 | −0.034 | 0.070 | 2.00 | −12 | 14 | 46 | 5.57 | 0.001 |
| Supp_Motor_Area | L | 122 | 0.088 | 0.058 | −0.034 | 0.071 | 1.95 | 8 | −14 | 48 | 4.18 | 0.001 |
| Temporal Mid | L | 178 | 0.014 | 0.024 | −0.074 | 0.054 | 2.19 | 58 | −16 | I8 | 4.60 | le-5 |
| Temporal_SuP | L | 144 | 0.047 | 0.045 | −0.064 | 0.083 | 1.73 | 50 | −28 | 12 | 4.99 | 0.001 |
| Sub-region 3 ( connection to occtpital) | ||||||||||||
| Postcentral | R | 153 | 0.073 | 0.050 | −0.040 | 0.085 | 1.68 | −52 | −4 | 30 | 4.15 | 0.001 |
| Piecentrai | R | 128 | 0.090 | 0.056 | −0.039 | 0.085 | 1.86 | −48 | −8 | 38 | 4.88 | 0.007 |
| Temporal_Sup | R | 92 | 0.042 | 0.041 | −0.024 | 0.096 | 0.93 | −54 | −10 | 12 | 4.46 | 0.009 |
| Sub-region 4 ( connection to prefrontal) | ||||||||||||
| Postcentral | R | 81 | 0.060 | 0.046 | −0.042 | 0.074 | 1.72 | −26 | −42 | 56 | 4.40 | le-5 |
| Postcentral | L | 55 | 0.037 | 0.041 | −0.063 | 0.068 | 1.85 | 20 | −32 | 58 | 4.04 | le-5 |
| Precentral | R | 94 | 0.090 | O.O80 | −0.036 | 0.070 | 1.74 | −50 | 4 | 34 | 5.03 | le-5 |
| Precentral | L | 40 | 0.025 | 0.036 | −0.076 | 0.069 | 1.90 | 56 | 0 | 34 | 4.71 | le-5 |
| Supp_Motor_Area | R | 36 | 0.054 | 0.079 | −0.033 | 0.053 | 1.34 | −12 | 0 | 52 | 3.91 | 0.002 |
| Temporal Mid | L | 37 | 0.008 | 0.038 | −0.071 | 0.057 | 1.35 | 52 | −48 | 6 | 5.41 | 0.002 |
| Temporal Mid | R | 27 | 0.025 | 0.051 | −0.052 | 0.044 | 1.68 | −52 | −64 | 6 | 3.17 | le-5 |
| Sub-region 5 ( connection to premotor) | ||||||||||||
| Precentral | R | 169 | 0.099 | 0.061 | −0.050 | 0.082 | 2.14 | −44 | 2 | 38 | 5.15 | le-5 |
| Precentral | L | 153 | 0.039 | 0.030 | −0.071 | 0.061 | 2.37 | 26 | −18 | 64 | 4.58 | 0.003 |
| Supp_Motor_Area | R | 123 | 0.098 | 0.068 | −0.037 | 0.063 | 2.14 | −10 | −16 | 60 | 5.64 | le-5 |
| Supp_Motor_Area | L | 121 | 0.100 | 0.064 | −0.033 | 0.063 | 2.17 | 10 | −18 | 60 | 5.61 | le-5 |
| Paracentral_Lobule | L | 80 | O.O80 | 0.060 | −0.051 | 0.063 | 2.21 | 6 | −22 | 58 | 5.11 | 0.002 |
| Postcentral | R | 146 | O.O82 | 0.055 | −0.062 | 0.082 | 2.14 | −30 | −36 | 68 | 4.10 | le-5 |
| Postcentral | L | 166 | 0.053 | 0.041 | −0.066 | 0.061 | 2.38 | 24 | −34 | 56 | 5.23 | 0.004 |
| Temporal Mid | R | 128 | 0.031 | 0.052 | −0.094 | 0.048 | 2.59 | −52 | −58 | 0 | 5.11 | 0.005 |
| Sub-region 6 ( connection to posterior parietal) | ||||||||||||
| Paracentral_Lobule | L | 39 | 0.076 | 0.05 5 | −0.065 | 0.080 | 2.13 | 10 | −30 | 60 | 4.48 | 0.003 |
| Panetal_Inf | R | 33 | 0.048 | 0.06 9 | −0.087 | 0.065 | 2.09 | −32 | −46 | 52 | 4.27 | 0.007 |
| Postcential | R | 256 | 0.090 | 0.06 5 | −0.052 | 0.085 | 1.95 | −52 | −8 | 36 | 6.13 | le-5 |
| Postcentral | L | 286 | 0.044 | 0.04 5 | −0.070 | 0.074 | 1.93 | 46 | −18 | 34 | 5.32 | 0.003 |
| Precuneus | L | 52 | 0.046 | 0.05 0 | −0.062 | 0.036 | 2.57 | 20 | −50 | 2 | 4.20 | le-5 |
| Precentral | R | 289 | 0.102 | 0.07 2 | −0.047 | 0.086 | 1.95 | −48 | −6 | 28 | 7.08 | le-5 |
| Precentral | L | 101 | 0.040 | 0.03 3 | −0.075 | 0.067 | 2.26 | 50 | 0 | 40 | 4.20 | 0.008 |
| Supp_Motor_Area | R | 101 | 0.096 | 0.06 0 | −0.038 | 0.061 | 2.30 | −10 | −22 | 64 | 5.53 | 0.002 |
| Temporal Mid | R | 85 | 0.027 | 0.04 4 | −0.089 | 0.039 | 2.90 | −52 | −66 | .2 | 4.13 | 0.001 |
| Sub-region 7 ( connection to temporal) | ||||||||||||
| Temporal Mid | L | 37 | 0.001 | 0.04 6 | −0.069 | 0.065 | 1.29 | 58 | −44 | .2 | 3.14 | 0.003 |
| Temporal_Sup | L | 31 | 0.020 | 0.05 1 | −0.038 | 0.078 | 0.91 | 46 | −40 | 12 | 3.80 | 0.030 |
| Postcentral | R | 63 | 0.042 | 0.04 7 | −0.034 | 0.064 | 1.40 | −26 | −42 | 56 | 4.61 | 0.001 |
| Postcentral | L | 37 | 0.038 | 0.04 4 | −0.060 | 0.069 | 1.76 | 38 | −34 | 54 | 3.70 | le-5 |
| Precentral | R | 35 | 0.077 | 0.08 1 | −0.035 | 0.075 | 1.49 | −28 | −26 | 52 | 3.89 | 0.001 |
| Precentral | L | 30 | 0.017 | 0.02 8 | −0.056 | 0.079 | 1.28 | 48 | −2 | 28 | 4.08 | 0.005 |
The brain regions were labeled according to the IBASPM 116 atlas (please see Methods for references).
Number of voxels that show significant group difference in this region.
Effect size was estimated with Cohen’sd.
Location of the voxel with the maximum (peak) T-score in the cluster in the MNI space. Shaded regions indicate non-primary targets of each seed (sub-thalamic region from the atlas). std: inter-subject standard deviation.
Table 3.
Hypo-connectivity (schizophrenia < control) between thalamic sub-regions and various brain regions in schizophrenia patients compared to controls.
| Functional connectivity (z) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| schizophrenia | control | Cluster Peakd(mm, MNI) | ||||||||||
| Regiona | Hemisphere | Cluster Sizeb | mean | std | mean | std | Effect Sizec | X | V | z | Peak T | Adjusted P Value |
| Sub-region 1 (connection to primary motor) | ||||||||||||
| Caudate | L | 133 | −0.023 | 0.077 | 0.108 | 0.057 | −2.01 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 4.65 | 0.002 |
| Sub-region 2 ( cormecrion to sensory ) | ||||||||||||
| Frontal_Sup | R | 48 | −0.059 | 0.029 | 0.039 | 0.035 | −3.16 | −16 | 26 | 54 | 3.92 | 0.003 |
| Frontal_Sup | L | 28 | −0.037 | 0.039 | 0.047 | 0.041 | −2.18 | 12 | 32 | 54 | 4.00 | 0.003 |
| Sub-region 3 ( connection to occipital) | ||||||||||||
| Cerebelum 8 | L | 71 | −0.020 | 0.038 | 0.032 | 0.057 | −1.11 | 42 | −54 | −52 | 4.05 | 0.003 |
| Cerebelum 9 | L | 52 | −0.021 | 0.048 | 0.048 | 0.077 | −1.12 | 12 | −52 | −50 | 4.18 | 0.002 |
| Sub-region 4 ( connection to prefrontal) | ||||||||||||
| Frontal_Mid | L | 78 | −0.065 | 0.074 | 0.032 | 0.056 | −1.53 | 4 | 17 | 36 | 3.90 | 0.003 |
| Frontal_Inf_Tri | L | 55 | −0.066 | 0.067 | 0.033 | 0.081 | −1.38 | 48 | 46 | 12 | 2.87 | 0.003 |
| Frontal_Inf_Oper | L | 52 | −0.024 | 0.076 | 0.044 | 0.076 | −0.93 | 60 | 12 | 22 | 2.81 | 0.003 |
| Caudate | L | 92 | −0.043 | 0.053 | 0.101 | 0.076 | −2.28 | 4 | 18 | −4 | 4.13 | 0.003 |
| Cmzulate Post | R | 37 | −0.025 | 0.063 | 0.094 | 0.072 | −1.3 | −4 | −40 | 22 | 4.28 | 0.003 |
| Sub-region 5 ( connection to premotor) | ||||||||||||
| Frontal_Sup | L | 33 | −0.043 | 0.050 | 0.048 | 0.042 | −2.05 | 14 | 50 | 38 | 4.33 | 0.003 |
| Caudate | L | 120 | −0.033 | 0.067 | 0.106 | 0.060 | −2.27 | 18 | 12 | 20 | 3.88 | 0.002 |
| Sub-region 6 ( cormecrion to posterior parietal) | ||||||||||||
| Frontal Sup | R | 82 | −0.062 | 0.034 | 0.045 | 0.038 | −3.07 | −22 | 54 | 10 | 4.89 | 0.002 |
| Frontal Mid | R | 64 | −0.066 | 0.036 | 0.028 | 0.033 | −2.72 | −30 | 50 | 4 | 4.38 | 0.002 |
| Caudate | L | 67 | −0.045 | 0.062 | 0.102 | 0.068 | −2.34 | 18 | 10 | 20 | 5.29 | 0.002 |
| Cingulate_Mid | R | 37 | −0.039 | 0.044 | 0.057 | 0.047 | −2.19 | −2 | −32 | 46 | 3.39 | 0.002 |
| Sub-region 7 ( connection to temporal) | ||||||||||||
| Cinzulate_Post | R | 33 | 0.002 | 0.069 | 0.108 | 0.097 | −1.31 | −10 | −40 | 18 | 4.25 | 0.002 |
The brain regions were labeled according to the IBASPM 116 atlas (please see Methods for references).
Number of voxels that show significant group difference in this region.
Effect size was estimated with Cohen’sd.
Location of the voxel with the maximum (peak) T-score in the cluster in the MNI space. Shaded regions indicate non-primary targets of each seed (sub-thalamic region from the atlas). std: inter-subject standard deviation.
Figure 2.

Map of thalamic functional connectivity changes between schizophrenia patients and control subjects overlaid on MNI normalized anatomical images. Only voxels that show significant difference between the two groups are highlighted (red: schizophrenia > control; blue: schizophrenia < control). Significant results from all sub-thalamic seed regions inTables 2 and3 are shown on the same figure.
Significant positive correlation was found between disease duration in schizophrenia patients and functional connectivity between the thalamus and the sensory/motor cortex (Figure 3). Significant negative correlation was observed between disease duration and functional connectivity between the thalamus and the prefrontal cortex (Figure 3). Age, smoking status and medication dosage were included as covariates in the correlation analysis. Note that here all sub-thalamic regions that showed significant difference in functional connectivity with the sensory/motor or the prefrontal cortex in the group comparisons were combined (union) in the correlation analysis, as results from individual seed region did not survive the significance tests, possibly due to insufficient sensitivity. The disease durations of the fourteen patients included in this analysis can be split into two sub-groups with moderate (n = 8) or long (n = 6) disease duration. However, the sample size of each sub-group was too small to detect significant differences between them. Functional connectivity did not significantly correlate with BPRS or MoCA scores (including subscales for both BPRS and MoCA), or antipsychotic medication dosage in schizophrenia patients.
Figure 3.

Correlations analysis. Scatter plots showing correlations between the disease duration in schizophrenia patients, and the thalamic functional connectivity to the sensory/motor cortex (a) and the prefrontal cortex (b), respectively. R2: adjusted R2 from linear regression. Age, smoking status and medication dosage were included as covariates in the correlation analysis. All sub-thalamic regions that showed significant difference in functional connectivity with the sensory/motor or the prefrontal cortex in the group comparisons were combined in the correlation analysis.
Functional connectivity between the thalamus and the sensory/motor cortex, and functional connectivity between the thalamus and the prefrontal cortex also showed significant negative correlation (Figure 4). Here, all sub-thalamic regions that showed significant difference in functional connectivity with the sensory/motor or the prefrontal cortex in the group comparisons were also combined asFigure 3.
Figure 4.

Correlation between thalamic functional connectivity to the sensory/motor cortex and the prefrontal cortex. R2: adjusted R2 from linear regression. All sub-thalamic regions that showed significant difference in functional connectivity with the sensory/motor or the prefrontal cortex in the group comparisons were combined in the correlation analysis.
The key findings including group differences and correlations remained significant when all analysis was repeated without global signal regression (GSR). The results without GSR are reported inSupplemental Tables S2 andS3.
4. Discussion
In this study, resting state BOLD fMRI was performed at 7T to examine functional connectivity between sub-thalamic regions and the other brain areas in schizophrenia patients. Our results showed impaired thalamic connectivity to the prefrontal cortex and the cerebellum, but enhanced thalamic connectivity to the motor/sensory cortex in schizophrenia. The negative correlation between the hyper-connectivity in the thalamus-sensory/motor circuit and the hypo-connectivity in the thalamus-prefrontal circuit may imply a compensatory mechanism in the brain, where additional cortical regions are recruited to subserve functions that have been impaired due to the pathology of the disorder (Anticevic et al., 2014;Anticevic et al., 2015). We also found significant correlations between altered functional connectivity and disease duration in the patients. Our main findings (altered thalamic connectivity to the cortex) in the current study are consistent with previous large scale studies conducted at 3T and lower fields(Anticevic et al., 2014;Anticevic et al., 2015;Cetin et al., 2014;Klingner et al., 2014). In the present study, we were able to detect comparable effect sizes with a much smaller cohort (n = 14, as compared to n = 90 in (Anticevic et al., 2014) and n = 222 in (Anticevic et al., 2015)). We attribute this primarily to the enhanced sensitivity of BOLD fMRI at higher magnetic field.
We used the Oxford thalamic connectivity atlas(Behrens et al., 2003a;Behrens et al., 2003b) to define the seed regions within the thalamus for the functional connectivity analysis in this study. Each sub-region (seed) in this atlas has a primary anatomical connection based on a probability threshold of 25% calculated from diffusion MRI measures. Therefore, many voxels within one sub-region can still have anatomical connections to brain regions other than their assigned primary target (Behrens et al., 2003a;Johansen-Berg et al., 2005). This seems to be the case for functional connectivity as well. In our data, each thalamic sub-region also had functional connections to multiple brain areas other than its primary target. Similar results have been reported in previous 3T studies (Anticevic et al., 2014;Anticevic et al., 2015). Alternatively, data driven approaches can be carried out to segment the thalamus based on the functional connectivity to various brain regions (Anticevic et al., 2014;Anticevic et al., 2015). As such procedures typically require much larger sample size, they will be incorporated in our subsequent studies.
The global signal regression (GSR) step in functional connectivity analysis may potentially confound group comparison results(Murphy et al., 2009), as the magnitudes of the global brain signal may vary under different physiological and pathological conditions(Yang et al., 2014). We therefore performed the same analysis with and without the GSR step in preprocessing. Similar to reports in the literature (Murphy et al., 2009), the results without GSR seemed to show somewhat less anti-correlations compared to results with GSR. However, our main findings including the group level differences in functional connectivity and correlations were consistent between the two methods.
Regional brain atrophy, which has been documented in schizophrenia (Kreczmanski et al., 2005;Loeber et al., 1999;Meda et al., 2008;Ota et al., 2014;Pearlson et al., 1997;Walther et al., 2011), may be another potential confounding effect for the functional connectivity measures. To rule out this confounding factor, we included gray matter volume derived from high resolution anatomical images as a covariate in group comparisons and correlation analyses in this study.
Tobacco use is always more prevalent in schizophrenia patients than the general population, and chronic smoking may significantly alter brain functions. Therefore, most control subjects recruited for this study were regular smokers, in order to group match the schizophrenia patients. The current smoking status of each study participant was recorded in cigarettes smoked per day, and the average numbers were comparable between controls and patients. Moreover, smoking status was included as a covariate for all statistical analyses here. Full exploration of the effects of smoking on functional connectivity will require a more detailed investigation, including more refined measures of cigarette exposure and a sample size sufficient to search for a dose-response relationship between smoking and measures of connectivity. Note that the functional connectivity data in controls in the current study may also be different from normal subjects in other studies due to tobacco use.
Finally, an important caveat is that the patients, not controls, in this study were all receiving antipsychotic medicines. Several studies have shown that antipsychotic drugs and their therapeutic effect can restore and increase functional connectivity in the ventral tegmental area (midbrain) (Hadley et al., 2014), striatum (Sarpal et al., 2015), dorsal attention network (Kraguljac et al., 2016a), and hippocampus (Kraguljac et al., 2016b) in schizophrenia patients. A further complication is that different pharmacological classes of antipsychotics may have different effects on brain function (Goozee et al., 2014). In our data, no significant correlation was found between functional connectivity and medication dosage in patients; and medication dosage was included as a covariate when assessing correlations between functional connectivity and disease duration, BPRS and MOCA scores (including subscales). Besides, decreased functional connectivity was found between the thalamus and the prefrontal cortex, and the cerebellum, whereas the studies mentioned above showed increased functional connectivity after antipsychotic drug administration. Future study is warranted to determine if abnormalities in functional connectivity are also presenting in unmedicated patients, and if antipsychotics differentially affect connectivity of specific brain regions.
The small sample size is a fundamental limitation of the current study. The heterogeneity of the study population (the patients can be split into two sub-groups with moderate (n = 8) or long (n = 6) disease duration) and differential effects of acute and chronic substance abuse other than tobacco may also confound the results of group comparisons and correlation analysis. Future studies with larger samples will be necessary to validate our findings, analyze additional clinical variables, and explore the relationship of thalamic anatomy and connectivity in further detail.
5. Conclusion
The enhanced sensitivity of BOLD fMRI at ultra-high field (7T) allowed the detection of altered functional connectivity between sub-regions in the thalamus and cortex in schizophrenia patients from a cohort much smaller compared to previous 3T studies. Our results therefore support the further development of ultra-high field functional connectivity measures as biomarkers for therapeutic trials in schizophrenia, which could greatly benefit from the capacity to detect functional changes with fewer subjects. In addition, our data support further investigation into the potential value of using functional connectivity, as determined by ultra-high field methods, to track disease progression and evaluate therapeutic interventions at the level of individual patients.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Mr. Joseph S. Gillen, Mrs. Terri Lee Brawner, Ms. Kathleen A. Kahl, and Ms. Ivana Kusevic for experimental assistance. This project was supported by a generous donation from Mr. Jose Brito, the ABCD Charitable Trust, and by the National Center for Research Resources and the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering of the National Institutes of Health through resource grant P41 EB015909, and by the National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health through grant R21 MH107016.
Role of funding source
This work was supported by NIH grants R21 MH107016 and P41 EB015909, the ABCD Charitable Trust, and a generous donation from Mr. Jose Brito.
Study funding: This study was supported by the resource grant NCRR NIBIB P41 EB015909, the grant NIMH R21 MH107016, the ABCD Charitable Trust, and a generous donation from Mr. Jose Brito.
Abbreviations:
- 3T
3.0 Tesla
- 7T
7.0 Tesla
- SCZ
Schizophrenia
- BOLD
Blood-oxygenation-level dependent
- fMRI
Functional MRI
- BPRS
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale
- MoCA
Montreal Cognitive Assessment
- GRE
Gradient-echo
- EPI
Echo-planar imaging
- SPM
Statistical Parametric Mapping
- GSR
Global signal regression
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Conflict of interest
Equipment used in the study was manufactured by Philips. Peter C.M. van Zijl receives grant support from Philips, is a paid lecturer for Philips, and is the inventor of technology that is licensed to Philips. This arrangement has been approved by Johns Hopkins in accordance with its conflict of interest policies.
References
- Andreasen NC, Pressler M, Nopoulos P, Miller D, Ho BC, 2010. Antipsychotic dose equivalents and dose-years: a standardized method for comparing exposure to different drugs.Biol Psychiatry67(3), 255–262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anticevic A, Cole MW, Repovs G, Murray JD, Brumbaugh MS, Winkler AM, Savic A, Krystal JH, Pearlson GD, Glahn DC, 2014. Characterizing thalamo-cortical disturbances in schizophrenia and bipolar illness.Cereb Cortex24(12), 3116–3130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anticevic A, Haut K, Murray JD, Repovs G, Yang GJ, Diehl C, McEwen SC, Bearden CE, Addington J, Goodyear B, Cadenhead KS, Mirzakhanian H, Cornblatt BA, Olvet D, Mathalon DH, McGlashan TH, Perkins DO, Belger A, Seidman LJ, Tsuang MT, van Erp TG, Walker EF, Hamann S, Woods SW, Qiu M, Cannon TD, 2015. Association of Thalamic Dysconnectivity and Conversion to Psychosis in Youth and Young Adults at Elevated Clinical Risk.JAMA psychiatry72(9), 882–891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Behrens TE, Johansen-Berg H, Woolrich MW, Smith SM, Wheeler-Kingshott CA, Boulby PA, Barker GJ, Sillery EL, Sheehan K, Ciccarelli O, Thompson AJ, Brady JM, Matthews PM, 2003a. Non-invasive mapping of connections between human thalamus and cortex using diffusion imaging.Nat Neurosci6(7), 750–757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Behrens TE, Woolrich MW, Jenkinson M, Johansen-Berg H, Nunes RG, Clare S, Matthews PM, Brady JM, Smith SM, 2003b. Characterization and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion-weighted MR imaging.Magn Reson Med50(5), 1077–1088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cetin MS, Christensen F, Abbott CC, Stephen JM, Mayer AR, Canive JM, Bustillo JR, Pearlson GD, Calhoun VD, 2014. Thalamus and posterior temporal lobe show greater inter-network connectivity at rest and across sensory paradigms in schizophrenia.Neuroimage97, 117–126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goozee R, Handley R, Kempton MJ, Dazzan P, 2014. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of antipsychotic medications on regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in schizophrenia: association with response to treatment.Neurosci Biobehav Rev43, 118–136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hadley JA, Nenert R, Kraguljac NV, Bolding MS, White DM, Skidmore FM, Visscher KM, Lahti AC, 2014. Ventral tegmental area/midbrain functional connectivity and response to antipsychotic medication in schizophrenia.Neuropsychopharmacology39(4), 1020–1030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johansen-Berg H, Behrens TE, Sillery E, Ciccarelli O, Thompson AJ, Smith SM, Matthews PM, 2005. Functional-anatomical validation and individual variation of diffusion tractography-based segmentation of the human thalamus.Cereb Cortex15(1), 31–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klingner CM, Langbein K, Dietzek M, Smesny S, Witte OW, Sauer H, Nenadic I, 2014. Thalamocortical connectivity during resting state in schizophrenia.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience264(2), 111–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kraguljac NV, White DM, Hadley JA, Visscher K, Knight D, ver Hoef L, Falola B, Lahti AC, 2016a. Abnormalities in large scale functional networks in unmedicated patients with schizophrenia and effects of risperidone.NeuroImage. Clinical10, 146–158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kraguljac NV, White DM, Hadley N, Hadley JA, Ver Hoef L, Davis E, Lahti AC, 2016b. Aberrant Hippocampal Connectivity in Unmedicated Patients With Schizophrenia and Effects of Antipsychotic Medication: A Longitudinal Resting State Functional MRI Study.Schizophrenia bulletin42(4), 1046–1055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kreczmanski P, Schmidt-Kastner R, Heinsen H, Steinbusch HW, Hof PR, Schmitz C, 2005. Stereological studies of capillary length density in the frontal cortex of schizophrenics.Acta Neuropathol109(5), 510–518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lancaster JL, Rainey LH, Summerlin JL, Freitas CS, Fox PT, Evans AC, Toga AW, Mazziotta JC, 1997. Automated labeling of the human brain: a preliminary report on the development and evaluation of a forward-transform method.Hum Brain Mapp5(4), 238–242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lancaster JL, Woldorff MG, Parsons LM, Liotti M, Freitas CS, Rainey L, Kochunov PV, Nickerson D, Mikiten SA, Fox PT, 2000. Automated Talairach atlas labels for functional brain mapping.Hum Brain Mapp10(3), 120–131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Loeber RT, Sherwood AR, Renshaw PF, Cohen BM, Yurgelun-Todd DA, 1999. Differences in cerebellar blood volume in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.Schizophrenia research37(1), 81–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maldjian JA, Laurienti PJ, Burdette JH, 2004. Precentral gyrus discrepancy in electronic versions of the Talairach atlas.Neuroimage21(1), 450–455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maldjian JA, Laurienti PJ, Kraft RA, Burdette JH, 2003. An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets.Neuroimage19(3), 1233–1239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marques JP, Kober T, Krueger G, van der Zwaag W, Van de Moortele PF, Gruetter R, 2009. MP2RAGE, a self bias-field corrected sequence for improved segmentation and T1-mapping at high field.Neuroimage49(2), 1271–1281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meda SA, Giuliani NR, Calhoun VD, Jagannathan K, Schretlen DJ, Pulver A, Cascella N, Keshavan M, Kates W, Buchanan R, Sharma T, Pearlson GD, 2008. A large scale (N=400) investigation of gray matter differences in schizophrenia using optimized voxel-based morphometry.Schizophrenia research101(1–3), 95–105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murphy K, Birn RM, Handwerker DA, Jones TB, Bandettini PA, 2009. The impact of global signal regression on resting state correlations: are anti-correlated networks introduced?Neuroimage44(3), 893–905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muschelli J, Nebel MB, Caffo BS, Barber AD, Pekar JJ, Mostofsky SH, 2014. Reduction of motion-related artifacts in resting state fMRI using aCompCor.Neuroimage96, 22–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H, 2005. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society53(4), 695–699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ota M, Ishikawa M, Sato N, Okazaki M, Maikusa N, Hori H, Hattori K, Teraishi T, Ito K, Kunugi H, 2014. Pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling MRI study of schizophrenic patients.Schizophrenia research154(1–3), 113–118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Overall JE, Gorham DR, 1962. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale.Psychol Rep10, 799–812. [Google Scholar]
- Pearlson GD, Barta PE, Powers RE, Menon RR, Richards SS, Aylward EH, Federman EB, Chase GA, Petty RG, Tien AY, 1997. Ziskind-Somerfeld Research Award 1996. Medial and superior temporal gyral volumes and cerebral asymmetry in schizophrenia versus bipolar disorder.Biol Psychiatry41(1), 1–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Power JD, Barnes KA, Snyder AZ, Schlaggar BL, Petersen SE, 2012. Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion.Neuroimage59(3), 2142–2154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rosner B, 2011. Fundamentals of Biostatistics, 7th ed. Brooks/Cole, Boston, MA, USA. [Google Scholar]
- Sarpal DK, Robinson DG, Lencz T, Argyelan M, Ikuta T, Karlsgodt K, Gallego JA, Kane JM, Szeszko PR, Malhotra AK, 2015. Antipsychotic treatment and functional connectivity of the striatum in first-episode schizophrenia.JAMA psychiatry72(1), 5–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Satterthwaite TD, Wolf DH, Loughead J, Ruparel K, Elliott MA, Hakonarson H, Gur RC, Gur RE, 2012. Impact of in-scanner head motion on multiple measures of functional connectivity: relevance for studies of neurodevelopment in youth.Neuroimage60(1), 623–632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith SM, Nichols TE, 2009. Threshold-free cluster enhancement: addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference.Neuroimage44(1), 83–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, Crivello F, Etard O, Delcroix N, Mazoyer B, Joliot M, 2002. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain.Neuroimage15(1), 273–289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Uludag K, Muller-Bierl B, Ugurbil K, 2009. An integrative model for neuronal activity-induced signal changes for gradient and spin echo functional imaging.Neuroimage48(1), 150–165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van de Moortele PF, Auerbach EJ, Olman C, Yacoub E, Ugurbil K, Moeller S, 2009. T1 weighted brain images at 7 Tesla unbiased for Proton Density, T2* contrast and RF coil receive B1 sensitivity with simultaneous vessel visualization.Neuroimage46(2), 432–446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van Dijk KR, Sabuncu MR, Buckner RL, 2012. The influence of head motion on intrinsic functional connectivity MRI.Neuroimage59(1), 431–438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walther S, Federspiel A, Horn H, Razavi N, Wiest R, Dierks T, Strik W, Muller TJ, 2011. Resting state cerebral blood flow and objective motor activity reveal basal ganglia dysfunction in schizophrenia.Psychiatry Res192(2), 117–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang GJ, Murray JD, Repovs G, Cole MW, Savic A, Glasser MF, Pittenger C, Krystal JH, Wang XJ, Pearlson GD, Glahn DC, Anticevic A, 2014. Altered global brain signal in schizophrenia.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A111(20), 7438–7443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.