Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Search in PMCSearch
As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more:PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice
PeerJ logo

Franz Josef Land: extreme northern outpost for Arctic fishes

Natalia V Chernova1,Alan M Friedlander2,3,✉,Alan Turchik2,Enric Sala2
Editor:Magnus Johnson
1Zoological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia
2National Geographic Society, Washington, DC, USA
3Fisheries Ecology Research Laboratory, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, USA
✉

Corresponding author.

Received 2014 Oct 12; Accepted 2014 Nov 20; Collection date 2014.

© 2014 Chernova et al.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of theCreative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.

PMCID: PMC4266852  PMID:25538869

Abstract

The remote Franz Josef Land (FJL) Archipelago is the most northerly land in Eurasia and its fish fauna, particularly in nearshore habitats, has been poorly studied. An interdisciplinary expedition to FJL in summer 2013 used scuba, seines, and plankton nets to comprehensively study the nearshore fish fauna of the archipelago. We present some of the first underwater images for many of these species in their natural habitats. In addition, deep water drop cameras were deployed between 32 and 392 m to document the fish fauna and their associated habitats at deeper depths. Due to its high latitude (79°–82°N), extensive ice cover, and low water temperatures (<0 °C much of the year), the fish diversity at FJL is low compared to other areas of the Barents Sea. Sixteen species of fishes from seven families were documented on the expedition, including two species previously unknown to the region. One Greenland shark,Somniosus microcephalus (Somniosidae), ca. 2 m in length, was recorded by drop camera near Hayes Island at 211 m, and Esipov’s pout,Gymnelus esipovi (Zoarcidae), was collected at Wilton Island at 15 m in a kelp forest. Including the tape-body pout,Gymnelus taeniatus, described earlier from the sub-littoral zone of Kuhn Island, 17 fish species are now known from FJL’s nearshore waters. Species endemic to the Arctic accounted for 75% of the nearshore species observed, followed by species with wider ranges. A total of 43 species from 15 families are known from FJL with the majority of the records from offshore trawl surveys between 110 and 620 m. Resident species have mainly high Arctic distributions, while transient species visit the archipelago to feed (e.g., Greenland shark), and others are brought by currents as larvae and later migrate to spawn grounds in the south (e.g., Atlantic codGadus morhua, CapelinMallotus villosus, Beaked redfishSebastes mentella). Another species group includes warmer-water fishes that are rare waifs (e.g., Glacier lanternfishBenthosema glaciale, White barracudinaArctozenus rissoi). The rapid warming of the Arctic will likely result in significant changes to the entire ecosystem and this study therefore serves as an important baseline for the nearshore fish assemblages in this unique and fragile region.

Keywords: Arctic, Franz Josef Land, Fishes, Climate change, Endemism, Biodiversity

Introduction

Owing to its unique biogeographic and climatic histories, the Arctic Ocean has produced a distinctive fish fauna dominated by phylogenetically young families (e.g., Zoarcidae, Stichaeidae) (Andriashev, 1939;Dunbar, 1968;Mecklenburg, Møller & Steinke, 2010). Older groups eliminated during the rapid cooling of the Middle Miocene were followed by younger families invading the Arctic mainly from the Pacific via the opening of the Bering Strait 3–3.5 million years ago (Andriashev, 1939;Savin, 1977;Mecklenburg, Møller & Steinke, 2010), while a few families have also invaded the region from the Atlantic (e.g., Gadidae, Anarhichadidae) (Svetovidov, 1948;Mecklenburg, Møller & Steinke, 2010). Of the 504 species currently comprising the Arctic ichthyofauna, those with Atlantic–Arctic ranges comprise 58% of the total richness, followed by species with Pacific–Arctic ranges (20%), while those endemic to the Arctic region account for an additional 14% (Chernova, 2011).

The Franz Josef Land (FJL) Archipelago is located within the Barents Sea Large Marine Ecosystem, which is a transition zone where relatively warm, more saline water from the Atlantic mixes with Arctic and Polar waters (Johannesen et al., 2012a). These oceanographic conditions result in high productivity (Cochrane et al., 2009) that supports major fisheries, including the largest remaining stock of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) (Johannesen et al., 2012b). Currently >200 fish species from 66 families are found in the Barents Sea (Stiansen & Filin, 2008;Dolgov, 2011). The dominant families are: eelpouts (Zoarcidae), sculpins (Cottidae), codfishes (Gadidae), snailfishes (Liparidae), flatfishes (Pleuronectidae), which collectively account for nearly 80% of the species regularly occurring in the Barents Sea.

FJL is azakaznik (protected area, equivalent to IUCN category IV), currently managed by the Russian Arctic National Park. Its remoteness and harsh physical environment makes it one of the least known places on earth. The archipelago is situated in the NE Barents Sea (79°–82°N, 43°–67°E) and consists of 192 islands, covering 16,134 km2 (Barr, 1994) Although FJL lies at the same latitude as Svalbard, Norway, the fish assemblages are very different (Fossheim, Nilssen & Aschan, 2006;Stiansen et al., 2009). The warm Atlantic currents that run along the northern continental slope of the Barents Sea, are greatly diminished by the time they reach FJL (Schauer et al., 2002), resulting in a biota consisting mainly of cold-water organisms (Wassmann et al., 2006). Because of remoteness and severe ice conditions most of the year, the FJL fish fauna has not been well studied.

Previous fish survey of FJL

The first records of fishes from FJL come from the Austro-Hungarian expedition of 1872–74, which noted blackbelly snailfish (asLiparis gelatinosus) and polar cod (asGadus morue) (Payer, 1878). During the Norwegian Polar Expedition of 1893–1896, polar cod (Boreogadus saida) were observed in the stomachs of several sea bird species (Collett & Nansen, 1899). The 1894–97 British Expedition to FJL spent a winter at Cape Flora on Northbrook Island and collected a few polar cod (Jackson, 1899). The same species was collected by the Italian expedition led by Duke of the Abruzzi, Luigi Amedeo, who wintered on Rudolf Island in 1899–1900 (Camerano, 1903).

In 1901, a Russian expedition to FJL on the ice-breakerErmak identified nine species of fishes at depths from 24 to 358 m. The Russian ice-breakerGeorgiy Sedov visited FJL in 1929 and collected Polar cod, twohorn sculpin (Icelus bicornis), and kelp snailfish (Liparis tunicatus) (Esipov, 1931;Esipov, 1933). An oceanographic expedition in 1955 conducted by the Soviet Arctic Institute (now AARI, St. Petersburg) surveyed the margins of the continental shelf north of FJL using trawls and collected ten species of fishes (Andriashev, 1964b;Koltun, 1964). In 1980–90s the Knipovitch Polar Research Institute of Marine Fisheries and Oceanography (PINRO, Murmansk) conducted benthic and pelagic trawls in the north-eastern Barents Sea, mainly 50–60 nm south-west of FJL in the Franz-Victoria Trough (depth 170–620 m), and collected 33 fish species (Borkin, 1993).

The expedition of the Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (ZIN) to FJL in 1981–82 used scuba to collect nearshore fishes. In 1991 and 1992, the expedition of the Murmansk Marine Biological Institute (MMBI) conducted additional scuba sampling at FJL, resulting in new information on three species of snailfishes (Chernova, 1993;Chernova, 2007). In addition, a new zoarcid fish, the tape-body poutGymnelus taeniatus was described from one specimen found in the sub-littoral zone off Kuhn Island (Chernova, 1999a).

Surveys of the Barents Sea were conducted from 2004 to 2009 under the Russian-Norwegian Cooperation Program, and resulted in an atlas of Barents-Sea fishes (Wienerroither et al., 2011). More than 30 species were listed from FJL, including the White barracudina,Arctozenus risso, and Esmark’s eelpout,Lycodes esmarkii. PINRO produced a key to the identification of Barents Sea fishes that listed 11 species for FJL including the thorny ray,Amblyraja radiata, which was collected near Alexandra Land and Prince George Land (Dolgov, 2011).

Currently, a total of 43 fish species from 15 families and 9 orders are known from FJL, with most species collected by trawling southwest of the archipelago at depths from 100 to 600 m (Table S1). In the summer of 2013, an interdisciplinary research expedition to FJL, led by the National Geographic Society and the Russian Arctic National Park, conducted an assessment of the biodiversity of the ichthyofauna using a suite of sampling methods with the objectives of describing the taxonomy and ecology of the nearshore ichthyofauna, while also exploring the deep sea environment around the archipelago.

Materials and Methods

Sample design

Nearshore fishes were collected using (1) scuba and snorkeling, (2) beach seines, (3) plankton net, and (4) samples regurgitated from seabirds. Observations andin situ photography were also used to conduct species identification. Approval to conduct research on vertebrate animals was granted by the Russian Federation Ministry of Education and Science Approval Ref. No. 14-368 of 06.05.2013. Approval to conduct field studies was granted by the Russian Federation Ministry of Education and Science Approval Ref. No. 14-368 of 06.05.2013 permission to the Russian Arctic National Park.

Diving methods

Three groups of divers conducted 68 dives at 19 localities at depths ranging from 0 to 34 m around the archipelago (Fig. 1). While diving, fish samples were collected using hand aquarium nets, nets and clove oil, or by hand. In addition, photographs were takenin situ to document underwater coloration and associated habitat.

Figure 1. Franz Joseph Land with names of islands where collections were conducted during the expedition.

Figure 1

Beach seines

Beach seines were used at four locations: Tikhaya Bay at Hooker Island (40 hauls), Cape Tegetthoff at Hall Island (6 hauls), Nilsen Bay at Bell Island (4 hauls) and Phoka Bay at Northbrook Island (6 hauls). The seine was 10 m long by 2 m high with 10 mm stretch mesh.

Plankton net

Larval and young-of-year fishes were collected by plankton net. Plankton sampling was conducted at 20 locations, primarily in the straits between islands at depths between 200 and 340 m, using vertical hauls from the bottom to surface. Plankton nets were of standard construction, with a mesh of 0.2 mm or 0.074 mm.

Deepwater drop camera

To explore the deep sea environments, deep drop-camera surveys were conducted. National Geographic’s Remote Imaging Team developed Deep Ocean Drop-cams, which are high definition cameras (Sony Handycam HDR-XR520V 12 megapixel) encased in a borosilicate glass sphere and rated to a 10,000 m depth. Viewing area per frame was between 2 and 6 m2, depending on the steepness of the slope where the Drop-cam landed. Cameras were baited with 1 kg of frozen herring (Clupeidae) placed in a burlap bag and deployed for ca. four hours. The number of individuals of each taxa per drop-cam deployment was estimated from the maximum number of individuals observed per frame (Nmax).

Field processing of fish samples

Collected fishes were measured and weighed on board and preserved in 4% buffer formaldehyde solution. Samples were send to the Zoological Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia (entry number ZIN No 6-013) and examined by the senior author. Vertebra and fin ray number were counted on radiograms.

Results

Our expedition identified sixteen species of fishes from seven families and three orders in the waters around FJL (Table 1). Of these, Scorpaeniformes was the most specious order, accounting for 81% of all species observed (Table 2). Species endemic to the Arctic accounted for 75% of the nearshore species observed (three-fourths of which had circumpolar distribution), followed by species with wider ranges, including the N. Atlantic and N. Pacific. Species with benthic or meso-benthic habitat preferences accounted for 75% of the observed nearshore assemblage, followed by bentho-pelagic species (18.8%), and one cryopelagic and benthopelagic species,Boreogadus saida. FJL nearshore waters are at the upper limit of vertical distribution for fishes of all species. The vast majority of the fishes observed around FJL were invertebrate feeders, while three were facultative piscivores (e.g., Greenland shark, Atlantic cod, Parr’s snailfish), with one—the cryopelagic polar cod—feeding primarily on zooplankton under the ice.

Table 1. Species of fishes observed during expedition to Franz Joseph Land in summer 2013.

Common nameScientific
name		Trophic
group		HabitatZoogeographic
groupa		RangeaDepth limits
(preference), ma
Somniosidae
Greenland sharkSomniosus
microcephalus		Pisc, InvBentho-pelagichigh-boreal—
arctic		Labrador, Baffin
Bay to Kara Sea		0–2200 (200–600)
Gadidae
Atlantic codGadus morhuaPisc, InvBentho-pelagicboreal–subarcticW Atlantic—
Barents Sea		0–700 (100–200)
Polar codBoreogadus saidaInvCryopelagic and
bentho-pelagic		arcticcircumpolar0–1390 (0–500)
Cottidae
Twohorn sculpinIcelus bicornisInvBenthicarcticcircumpolar0–930 (40–80)
HameconArtediellus scaberInvBenthicarcticcircumpolar0–290 (0–50)
Bigeye sculpinTriglops nybeliniInvMesobenthicarcticcircumpolar71–1354 (200–600)
Cyclopteridae
Atlantic spiny
lumpsucker		Eumicrotremus spinosusInvBentho-pelagichigh-boreal–
arctic		W Atlantic, Beaufort
to Barents seas		5–930 (60–200)
Derjugin’s leatherfin lumpsuckerEumicrotremus derjuginiInvBenthicarcticN Sea of
Okhotsk-Arctic		50–930 (50–275)
McAlpin’s smooth
lumpfish		Cyclopteropsis mcalpiniInvBenthicarcticBaffin Bay to
Barents Sea		50–170
Liparidae
Parr’s snailfishLiparis bathyarcticusPisc, InvBenthicarcticcircumpolar12–510 (30–350)
Kelp snailfishLiparis tunicatusInvBenthicarcticcircumpolar0–415 (0–100)
Blackbelly snailfishLiparis cf.fabriciiInvBenthicarcticcircumpolar12–1460 (0–125)
Agonidae
Atlantic poacherLeptagonus decagonusInvBenthicamphiboreal–
arctic		W Pacific, W Atlantic,
Arctic		24–930 (120–475)
Zoarcidae
Arctic eelpoutLycodes reticulatusInvMeso-benthicarcticCircumpolar?20–930 (100–380)
Anderson’s poutGymnelus andersoniInvBenthicarcticBarents-Laptev seas28–300
Esipov’s poutGymnelus esipoviInvBenthicarcticBarents-Laptev seas40–387

Notes.

a

AfterChernova (2011); Pisc, piscivore; Inv, invertivore.

Table 2. The number of fish orders, families, and species collected or observed in waters around Franz Josef Land during summer 2013.

OrderFamilyNumber of species
SqualiformesSomniosidae1
GadiformesGadidae2
ScorpaeniformesCottidae3
Agonidae1
Cyclopteridae3
Liparidae3
Zoarcidae3

Drop-cams

A total of 24 camera drops were conducted during the expedition, at depths from 32 to 292 m. Although numerous benthic organisms were observed (e.g., amphipods, soft corals, brittle stars, bryozoans) fishes were not common. Five fish taxa were observed during drop-cam surveys, with Polar cod the most common, occurring in 37.5% of the camera drops. Observations of Polar cod ranged from 125 to 392 m and averaged 0.75 individuals per drop, withNmax = 6 in any given frame. The cottid,Iselus bicornis was present on three drops (16.7%) withNmax = 3, and depths ranging from 58 to 132 m. Another cottid,Artediellus scaber, was observed on two drops withNmax = 4 at depths of 281–392 m. A single individual of an unidentified species, likely Capelin,Mallotus villosus, was observed twice; once at Torup I. (296 m) and once at Bell I. (121 m), but was not included in our species list due to taxonomic uncertainty. The most interesting sighting was one large (>2 m) Greenland shark (Somniosus microcephalus), which was observed off of Hayes Island on 13.08.2013 in 211 m.

Species accounts

Family Somniosidae—Sleeper Sharks

Somniosus microcephalus (Bloch et Schneider, 1801)—Greenland shark (Fig. 2)

Figure 2. Greenland shark,Somniosus microcephalus, off Hayes Island in 211 m.

Figure 2

One 2 m specimen was recorded on drop camera off Hayes Island in 211 m (80°38.4N, 58°08.4E). This species was previously not known to occur around FJL (Dolgov, 2011;Wienerroither et al., 2011). This sighting therefore represents the first record of a Greenland shark from FJL and is the most north-eastern record for this species.

Family Gadidae—codfishes

Boreogadus saida (Lepechin, 1774)—Polar cod (Fig. 3)

Figure 3. Polar cod,Boreogadus saida, TL 64 mm; Prince Rudolf Island.

Figure 3

Polar cod are common at FJL and were recorded at 9 islands at depths ranging from 6 to 21 m. Additional observations were made on drop cameras ranging in depth from 125 to 392 m. Polar cod occurred on 33% of the drop-cam deployments, averaging 0.75 individuals per frame, with a maximum of 6 in any given frame.

MC: ZIN 6-013/7, length TL 64 mm, Prince Rudolf I., Cape Fligeli, 81°50.92N, 59°15.77E, 19.08.2013, dp 6–21 m; habitat—stones, sand; coll. OV Savinkin, AN Chichaev.—ZIN 6-013/19, female TL 151 mm, 14.08.2013, Cape Podgorniy, Alger I., found on beach; coll. MV Gavrilo. VO: TL 160 mm, Hayes I., 80°37.82N, 58°03.29E, 12.08.2013, dp 11 m, A Friedlander. DC: observed on 8 of 24 camera drops at Algers (392 m), Hayes (171–211 m), Komsomolski (125 m), Kuhn (132 m), Luigi (357 m), Nansen (215 m), and Torup (297 m).

Polar cod were mentioned in FJL by numerous researchers dating back to the earliest expeditions (Payer, 1878;Jackson, 1899;Nansen, Johansen & Nordahl, 1900;Collett & Nansen, 1899;Knipowitch, 1901). Workers at the Tikhaya Bay Hydro-Meteorological station on Hooker Island (80.3°N, 52.8°E) in 1931–32 regularly observed polar cod, most often during ice-hummock formation (Burmakin, 1957). Explosives were used to collect these fishes at 10–15 m, resulting in >100 fish per blast event. In the summer of 1975 and 1979, the staff of the Hydro-Meteorological station at Hayes Island observed schools of polar cod “so large that they were scooped up by hand net” (Borkin, 1983). PINRO expeditions found polar cod were common south-east of the archipelago at depths of 170–460 m (Borkin, 1993). Other sources state that polar cod occur north towards the North Pole among the ice pack (Andriashev, Mukhomediyarov & Pavshtiks, 1980;Mel’nikov & Chernova, 2013a;Mel’nikov & Chernova, 2013b).

Gadus morhua Linnaeus, 1758—Atlantic cod

One Atlantic cod were collected. MC: ZIN 6-013/22, TL 200 mm, Alexandra Land, 80°42.58N, 47°31.55E, 28.08.2013; dp 15 m, habitat—rocks, coll. A Friedlander.

Previously, one cod larva (18 mm TL) was collected 28.08.1980 south-east of FJL (79°43′N, 46°28′E) by plankton net at 310–340 m; water temperature = −0.4 °C (Borkin, 1993). Adult cod were found south-west of FJL during the Russian-Norwegian Cooperation Program from 2004–2009 (Wienerroither et al., 2011).

Family Cottidae—Sculpins

Icelus bicornis (Reinhardt, 1840)—Twohorn sculpin (Fig. 4)

Figure 4. Twohorn sculpin,Icelus bicornis.

Figure 4

(A) Young, Wilton Island; color is mottled, with dark brown spots and yellow strips with pale background. A large triangular spot is present below the first dorsal fin, with 4 small rounded spots are found below the second dorsal fin. Dark bands radiate around eye; fin rays locally yellow; a round brown spot is present on the base of pectoral fin. (B) Juvenile TL 34 mm, Hooker Island, ZIN 6-013/2. (C) Occipital thorns of hind pair are visible at nape, directed backward; narrow pale strip is present behind head, wide brown spot narrowing downward is present below the first dorsal fin. (D) Adult male, Kuhn Island, ZIN 6-013/5; dorsal and anal fins are enlarged, bright orange and white bands are intermittent at anal and caudal fins (sexual dimorphism).

Individuals were recorded at 8 islands between 7 and 21 m.

MC: 8 specimens TL 30–95 mm from 5 stations; ZIN 6-013/2, juv. TL 32 mm, Hooker I., 80°19.14N, 52°48.66E, 02.08.2013, dp 20 m; coll. A Friedlander.—ZIN 6-013/5, female TL 48 mm, Kuhn I., 81°10.46N, 58°21.12E, 09.08.2013, coll. OV Savinkin.—ZIN 6-013/6, female TL 95 mm and 3 juv. TL 32–61 mm, Alexandra Land, 80°42.57N, 47°31.55E, 28.08.2013; ground—stones; dp 15 m.—ZIN 6-013/24, juv. TL 30 mm, Wilton I. (at the entrance to Esipov Bay on Nansen I.), 81°34.5N, 54°19.9E, 23.08.2013, st 31, dp 6–21 m, ground—boulders, stones, sand; coll. AN Chichaev.—ZIN 6-013/28, juv. TL 36 mm, Scott-Keltie I., 81°21.3N 52°26.0E, 27.08.2013, dp 17 m; ground—sand; coll. A Friedlander. VO: length to 130 mm, dp 7–15 m, A Friedlander. 1 sp, Northbrook I., Cape Flora, 79°57.43N, 50°02.67E, 05.08.2013.—1 sp, Brosh I., 81°06.27N, 58°21.01E, 08.08.2013.—3 sp, Kuhn I., 81°06.68N, 58°19.78E, 16.08.2013.—1 sp, Komsomol I., 80°38.82N, 58°55.05E, 17.08.2013.

The species is common at FJL. Fish were observed mainly in rocky areas, mixed with sand, boulders and shells, and water temperature <0 °C. Underwater observations show fish usually sitting on the bottom, perched atop widely spaced pectoral fins. A mottled disaggregated color provides camouflage over mixed bottoms.

Artediellus scaber Knipowitch, 1907—Hamecon (Fig. 5)

Figure 5. Hamecon,Artediellus scaber.

Figure 5

(A) Female TL 69 mm, ZIN 6-013/29, preserved specimen; nape behind eyes is depressed, occipital thorns not expressed. (B) Specimen is sitting near rock within area of macroalgae. (C) Mottled color camouflages fish on sandy-pebble bottom. (D) Hamecon feeding on peryphiton with sea urchin present in front; Bliss I. (E) Hamecon among red algae; Bliss I.

The species was found at 9 islands between 6 and 21 m.

MC: 9 specimens TL 31–75 mm. ZIN 6-013/14, TL 43 mm, Luigi I., 80°52.5N, 54°41.7E, 06.08.2013, dp 10 m.—ZIN 6-013/8, TL 62 mm, Prince Rudolf I., Cape Fligeli; 81°50.92N, 59°15.77E, 19.08.2013, dp 6–21 m; ground—small stones, sand; st 28, coll. OV Savinkin, AN Chichaev.—ZIN 6-013/16, TL 66 mm, Wilton I., 80°34.16N, 54°17.84E; 23.08.2013, dp 17 m; ground—rock; coll. A Friedlander.—ZIN 6-013/17, juv. SL 28 mm, Alger I., 80°22.79N, 53°46.18E, 14.08.2013, dp 12–22 m; ground—sand; st 18, coll. OV Savinkin.—ZIN 6-013/18, juv. TL 31 mm, Zub I. near Bliss I., 80°22.3 N, 54°39.6E, 24.08.2013, dp 11 m; ground—sand; st 32, coll. AN Chichaev,—ZIN 6-013/20, TL 75 mm, Kuhn I., 81°10.46N, 58°21.12E; 09.08.2013, coll. OV Savinkin.—ZIN 6-013/23, TL 73 mm, Wilton I., 81°34.5N, 54°19.9E; 23.08.2013; st 31, dp 6–21 m; ground—boulders, stones, sand, coll. AN Chichaev.—ZIN 6-013/27, juv. TL 28 mm, Scott-Keltie, 81°21.3N, 52°26.0E, 27.08.2013, dp 17 m; ground—sand; coll. A Friedlander.—ZIN 6-013/29, TL 69 mm, Prince Rudolf I., Teplitz Bay, 81°47N, 51°55E, 18.08.2013, dp 15–18 m, ground—boulders, sand; st 25, coll. SD Grebelniy. VO: 1 sp, Matilda I., 80°21.92N, 55°44.33E, 14.08.2013, 15 m, A Friedlander.—1 sp, Bliss I., 24.08.2013, OV Savinkin.

The Hamecon was a common inshore species and appeared to be highly site attached among rocks and boulders. A variegated color pattern was observed in mixed sand and rocky habitat. Hamecon were found in habitats ranging from the shallow red algae zone at Bliss Island to deeper (8–20 m)Laminaria spp. beds off Prince Rudolf Island (SD Grebelniy, pers. comm., 2014).

Triglops nybelini—Bigeye sculpin

One fish was identified by a photograph taken 20.08.2013 by MV Gavrilo at Torup I. (Fig. 6). The fish, ca. 15 cm TL, was in the mouth of a Black guillemotCepphus grylle (family Alcidae). It was identified as a Bigeye sculpin,Triglops nybelini, based on its elongated body, wide pectoral fins, cottoid-like shape, and a line of black spots above the anal-fin base.

Figure 6. Bigeye sculpin (Triglops nybelini) observed in the mouth of a Black guillemot (Cepphus grylle), Torup Island, 20.08.2013.

Figure 6

Bigeye sculpin are frequently caught in trawls around FJL, primarily over silty sand in 100–500 m (Knipowitch, 1901;Andriashev, 1964b). Hundreds of young-of-year (age 0 +, 60–112 mm) were caught by pelagic trawl west of FJL (Borkin, 1993). The presence of two otherTriglops species around FJL (T. murrayi andT. pingelii) (Wienerroither et al., 2011) need to be verified.

Family Cyclopteridae—Lumpfishes

Eumicrotremus spinosus (Fabricius, 1776)—Atlantic spiny lumpsucker (Fig. 7)

Figure 7. Atlantic spiny lumpsucker,Eumicrotremus spinosus.

Figure 7

(A) Bliss Island, body is entirely covered by spiny plates; two pair of tubular nostrils are visible on snout in front of eye; barbels on chin present. (B) Juvenile sitting onLaminaria sp.; caudal portion is nearly equal to trunk length.

Specimens were recorded at 3 islands at depths from 8 to 15 m.

MC: 1 sp TL 31 mm, Matilda I. (opposite Alger I.), 80°21.92N, 55°44.33E, 14.08.2013, dp 8–15 m; A Friedlander. VO: adult, Wilton I., 23.08.2013, photo: OV Savinkin;—adult, Bliss I., 24.08.2013, photo in aquarium: AP Kamenev;—juv., 24.08.2013, same location, photo: A Friedlander.

Adult fish were observed adhering to rocks using ventral disks, juveniles were found sitting on thalli ofLaminaria spp. kelp. Previously, this species was recorded in FJL at 79°55N, 49°48E, 27.07.1901, in 34 m over shell habitat (Knipowitch, 1901), and also found west of Alexandra Land (Wienerroither et al., 2011).

Eumicrotremus derjugini Popov, 1926—Derjugin’s leatherfin lumpsucker (Fig. 8)

Figure 8. Derjugin’s leatherfin lumpsucker,Eumicrotremus derjugini.

Figure 8

(A) Young, Zub Island; forehead prominent, snout abruptly vertical; spiny plates weakly developed and small, appearing in three longitudinal short rows, 3–4 plates each; color is light brown with dark twisting lines. (B) Same specimen from below; sucking disk consists of transformed ventral fins. (C) Juvenile TL 14 mm, Prince Rudolf Island, ZIN 6-013/10; the first dorsal fin already covered by thickened skin. (D) Same specimen after preservation.

Specimens were collected at Prince Rudlof and Zub islands at 6–21 m.

MC: ZIN 6-013/10, juv. TL 14 mm, Prince Rudolf I., Cape Fligeli, 81°50.92N, 59°15.77E, 19.08.2013, dp 6–21 m; ground—small stones, sand; st 28, coll. OV Savinkin, SD Grebelniy. VO. Young, 24.08.2013, Zub I., photo: OV Savinkin.

Eumicrotremus derjugini differs fromE. spinosus by having the first dorsal fin hidden in thick fleshy leather; spiny plates on the body are smaller; enlarged plates in front of the anal fin origin and along the first dorsal fin are absent; transversal skin folds between ventral sucking disk and anus are absent; barbels on chin are absent. In young fish, spiny plates are less developed than in adults. Previously a single juvenile was recorded from a trawl (79°46′N, 63°08′E) at 240 m (Borkin, 1983;Borkin, 1993).

Cyclopteropsis mcalpini—McAlpin’s smooth lumpfish (Fig. 9)

Figure 9. McAlpin’s smooth lumpfish,Cyclopteropsis mcalpini, collected between Torup and Howen islands.

Figure 9

(A) Adult 30 mm in length; sitting onNeptunea sp. shell; egg clutch is visible inside the shell. (B, C) Close-up of same specimen. (D, E) Embryo, extracted from egg, which was attached toNeptunea sp. shell; yolk sac is large, sucking disk present.

An adultCyclopteropsis mcalpini ca. 40 mm TL was observed sitting on the empty shell of the GastropodNeptunea sp., with its egg mass inside the shell. This shell was collected between Torup and Howen islands at 81°31N, 58°31.7E, 20.08.2013, st 29, dp 18–31 m, habitat—rock, stones, sand, shells; coll. OV Savinkin.

Forehead is wide and flattened, mouth is up turned; a row of 4 small spiny plates present on body sides; color is pale with dark brown irregular net-like spots. The eggs, ca. 6 mm in diameter, had well developed larvae that were nearly ready to hatch.Andriashev (1964a) noted parental care inCyclopteropsis when a male was found on an empty gastropod shell protecting juveniles.

Family Liparidae—Snailfishes

Liparis bathyarcticus Parr, 1931—Parr’s snailfish (Fig. 10)

Figure 10. Parr’s snailfish,Liparis bathyarcticus.

Figure 10

(A, B) Young specimens alive, TL 41 mm, Hayes Island, ZIN 6-013/3; color orange-brownish. (C) Same specimen; color brown after death; (D) Juvenile TL15 mm captured in plankton net; Pioneer Island, ZIN 6-013/33. (E)In situ specimen TL 41 mm.

MC: 5 specimens from 2 stations; ZIN 6-013/3, TL 41 mm, Hayes I., 80°37.63N, 58°03.88E, 13.08.2013, dp 8 m; coll. A. Friedlander.—ZIN 6-013/33, 5 juv. TL 15–16 mm, Pioneer I., 80°38.82N, 58°55.05E, 17.08.2013, dp 15 m; st 22; coll. A Friedlander. VO: 2 specimens at Hayes I., Cape Druzhniy, 80°37.64N, 58°04.104E, 13.08.2013, dp 6–1.5 m.

Parr’s snailfish (ZIN 6-013/3) were found at 8 m, in rocky habitat with gravel and clay. A pair was observed sitting in a hole between rocks among small brown and green algae, at 1.5–6 m. LarvalL. bathyarcticus were observed 17.08.2013 in large numbers at 10–15 m at Pioneer Island. Densities were as high as 10 s m-2. Similar densities were observed on nearby Kuhn Island between 6 and 10 m on 16.08.2013 (A Friedlander). Mean length of larvae was 13 mm (n = 12) and were without pigment.

Early stage juveniles (TL 15–16 mm; egg sack still present; sucking disk entirely developed) were present in our samples. The gill slit is as in adults, large and reaching down to mid-base of pectoral fin upper lobe (in other arctic snailfishes it only extends from the 1st to 6th pectoral fin ray). The nameL. bathyarcticus was revalidated (Chernova, 2008). Adults feed partly on fishes.

Liparis tunucatus Reinhardt, 1837—Kelp snailfish (Fig. 11)

Figure 11. Kelp snailfish,Liparis tunicatus.

Figure 11

(A) Female TL 137 mm, Prince Rudolf Island, ZIN 6-013/9. (B) A pairin situ, Stolichki Island, ZIN 6-013/11.

We recorded twelve specimens (TL 46–166 mm) at four islands between 6 and 30 m.

MC: ZIN 6-013/9, female TL 137 mm, Prince Rudolf I., Cape Fligeli, 81°50.92N, 59°15.77E, 19.08.2013, dp 6–21 m; ground—small stones, sand; st 28, coll. OV Savinkin, AN Chichaev.—ZIN 6-013/12, juv. TL 46 mm, Prince Rudolf I., 81°51.09N, 59°14.76E, 19.08.2013, dp 15 m, coll. A Friedlander.—ZIN 6-013/11, male TL 145 mm, and 3 sp, length 105–109 mm; Stolichki I., eastward of Milovzorov rocks, 81°11.91N, 58°11.46E, 08.08.2013; dp 6 m; coll. A Friedlander. VO: 6 sp, length to 166 mm, A. Friedlander. 3 sp, Prince Rudolf I., 81°51.09N, 59°14.76E, 19.08.2013, dp 15 m.—2 sp, Howen I., 81°30.95N, 58°21.41E, 20.08.2013, dp 15 m.—1 sp., Nansen I., 80°34.16N, 54°17.84E, 23.08.2013, dp 30 m.

Kelp snailfish are common at FJL. Divers in 1981–1982 collected 47 specimens from 24 localities at 1–32 m (Chernova, 1989;Chernova, 1991;Chernova, 1993). Fish were dark red and usually attached to lower surface of kelp thalli, or under rock using their sucking disks. Spawning is known to occur in March, and previous underwater observations found blackish-green egg clutches on kelp thalli at 6 to 25 m during this time.

Liparis cf.fabricii Krøyer, 1847—Blackbelly snailfish (Fig. 12)

Figure 12. Blackbelly snailfish,Liparis cf.fabricii.

Figure 12

(A) Adult male TL 165 mm from Luigi Island in aquarium, ZIN 6-013/13; note elongated pectoral fin lower-lobe rays with tactile receptors. (B) Specimen from Mable Island in an aquarium. (C, D) Length TL 106 mm, view from above and below; Bell Island. (E) Young specimen TL 72 mm; collected in plankton net; dark spots are distinct on transparent fins; black peritoneum hidden by silvery pigmentation. (F) Young TL 33 mm after preservation, ZIN 6-013/ 32.

Specimens were found by divers at 6 islands between 10 and 25 m; fry SL 31–83 mm were collected by plankton net between 142 and 400 m.

MC: 5 sp TL to 165 mm; ZIN 6-013/13, male TL 165 mm, Luigi I., Burke Bay, 81°51.72N, 54°47.30E, 6.08.2013, dp 20–25 m; ground—silty sand, stones, silt; fish sitting onLaminaria; coll. AN Chichaev.—ZIN 6-013/25, TL 106 mm, Bell I., 80°02.29N, 49°11.75E, 21.08.2013, dp 17–22 m; ground—sand; coll. OV Savinkin.—ZIN 6-013/26, 2 sp TL 72 mm, Prince Rudolf I., 19.08.2013; plankton net between 200 and 340 m; coll. DM Martinova.—ZIN 6-013/32, 1 sp SL 31 mm, straight near McClintock I., 24.08.2013, 80°04.7N, 55°24.7E.; plankton net between 142 and 400 m; coll. A Friedlander. VO (OV Savinkin): young specimen, Mabel I., 25.08.2013;—juv, Hooker I. at Rubini Rock, 1–2.08.2013.

The blackbelly snailfishLiparis fabricii is a species complex which differs from other Arctic snailfishes in that it has a black peritoneum (i.e., wall of body cavity) (Chernova, 2008).

The form from FJL collected by our expedition had a rounded head (head width is equal to head depth) and a tapered snout with a prominent point. The posterior nostril is half the size of the anterior nostril, without flap-like projections. The mouth is horizontal with small anterior teeth, jaws are trilobate, posterior teeth have small lateral shoulders. Snout folds are undeveloped, opercular flaps are rounded. Gill slits reach to 5–8th pectoral rays. Some anterior dorsal fin rays are shorter than posterior rays. The upper pectoral fin lobes reach slightly behind the anal fin origin. The disk is well developed and the skin of adult males is covered by cone-like prickles. Vertebrae 50–53 (11 + 39 − 42); D 44–49, A 37–41; P 36 (28 + 8). Caudal fin includes 9–10 principal rays, 2 upper and 2 lower secondary rays. Color is blackish with small black spots; between 3 and 5 wide oblique bands present at dorsal and anal fins. Peritoneum black, after preservation without silvery pigmentation.

Pelagic young have a dark band along the dorsal fin base; dorsal and anal fins are semi-transparent, with 5 and 3 transversal blackish spots, respectively; the peritoneum is black and distinctly visible through body wall, masked from the outside by silvery guanine pigmentation that quickly disappears after preservation in formaldehyde.

Underwater observation shows adults close to the bottom, among thalli of kelp, at a depth 10–25 m; ground—silty sand with stones, overgrown by algae (mainlySacharina latissima andAlaria esculenta).

Blackbelly snailfish are common at FJL. Divers from the MMBI expedition collected 20 specimens at 13 locations (Chernova, 1993). Based on PINRO surveys,L. fabricii likely school, with >500 specimens caught in a one hour trawl; aggregations of young in pelagic trawls (0+, 100 s of specimens) were recorded westward of FJL, at 81°04N, 43°18E (Borkin, 1993).

Family Agonidae—Sea Poachers

Leptagonus decagonus (Bloch et Schneider, 1801)—Atlantic poacher

One Atlantic poacher, TL 180 mm, was identified from Brosh Island (81°06.28N, 58°21.19E), 08.09.2013, at 10 m (identification: A Friedlander).Leptagonus decagonus (16–21 cm) were collected at FJL by PINRO surveys at 245–400 m (Borkin, 1993), and also south of Alexandra Land (Wienerroither et al., 2011).

Family Zoarcidae—Eelpouts

Lycodes reticulatus Reinhardt, 1835—Arctic eelpout (Fig. 13)

Figure 13. Arctic eelpout,Lycodes reticulatus, Hayes Island.

Figure 13

(A) Specimen in aquarium, color is dark, brown-black, bright light spots and transversal bands are present. (B) Arctic eelpoutin situ, hidden in a shelter under rocks. (C) Same aquarium specimen as above.

Three specimens between 180 and 48 mm TL were recorded at depths from 6 to 15 m sheltering in rocky areas among kelp (identification: A. Friedlander): Brosh I., 81°06.26N, 58°21.15E, 16.08.2013, dp 15 m.—Hayes I., 80°37.82N, 58°03.29E, 12.08.2013, dp 6 m.—Howen I., 81°30.95N, 58°21.41E, 20.08 2013, dp 15 m. Previously specimens were collected from Alexandra Land at 124 m (Andriashev, 1964b), and south of the archipelago between 180 and 410 m (Borkin, 1993;Wienerroither et al., 2011).

Gymnelus andersoni Chernova, 1998—Anderson’s pout (Fig. 14)

Figure 14. Anderson’s pout,Gymnelus andersoni, male TL 120 mm, ZIN 6-013/1.

Figure 14

Specimen found on ship’s deck, partially digested and likely deposited by a seabird. Dorsal fin origin near dissecting needle. Buccal muscle enlarged and prominent (sexual dimorphism). Indistinct vertical light brown and pale wide bands alternating on body.

MC: ZIN 6-013/1, male TL 120 mm, Hooker I., Tikhaya Bay, 80°19,39N, 52°50,87E, 4.9.2013.

One specimen was found on the deck of the ship partially digested and likely deposited by a seabird (caudal portion missing). The specimen has infraorbital pores absent; the origin of the dorsal fin was near vertical of the anal-fin origin; pre-dorsal distance (from tip of snout to dorsal fin origin) is 205% of head length (lc). Radiogram counts: abdominal vertebrae 21. The first ray of D-fin located between vertebrae 14 and 15; 11 interneuralia bear no corresponding dorsal fin ray, the first is between vertebrae 4 and 5. Head depressed. Pectoral fin length 57.5% lc. Pectoral-fin rays 10.

Anderson’s pout differs fromG. viridis by the posterior position of dorsal fin origin, with the pre-dorsal distance 2x longer than the head length.Gymnelus andersoni differs fromG. retrodorsalis (with similar position of dorsal fin origin) by having reduced sensory pores in the infraorbital canal (pores below eye are closed or entirely absent) (Chernova, 1998a;Chernova, 1998b). Paratypes ofG. andersoni derive south-east of FJL (77°31N, 64°34E) at a depth of 280 m (ZIN 14160).

Gymnelus esipovi Chernova, 1999—Esipov’s pout (Fig. 15)

Figure 15. Esipov’s pout,Gymnelus esipovi, male TL 141 mm, Wilton Island.

Figure 15

MC: ZIN 6-013/4, male TL 141 mm, Wilton I., 80°34.16N, 54°17.84E, 23.08.2013, dp 15 m, habitat—rock; collected in kelp by A Friedlander.

Gymnelus esipovi differs fromG. andersoni in its anterior dorsal fin position (pre-dorsal distance <1.3 larger than head); infraorbital pores are well developed. This species was previously known only from Spitsbergen, the northern Barents Sea near Novaya Zemlya (75°53-76°30N, 51°55-57E), and the northern Kara Sea (Chernova, 1999a). This is the first record ofGymnelus esipovi from FJL.

Discussion

FJL fish fauna diversity

Our expedition identified 16 species of fishes from 7 families mainly in nearshore FJL (<34 m). We added two species previously unknown for FJL; the Greenland shark (Hayes Island, 211 m) and Esipov’s pout (Wilton Island, 15 m). For many other species, our expedition increased the numbers of localities within the archipelago where these species are known, as well as identifying new upper depth limits for many species. The only nearshore fish species previously recorded from the archipelago but not found during our expedition was the tape-body poutGymnelus taeniatus, which is likely locally endemic to Franz Josef Land (Chernova, 1999a).

Most of the trophic diversity is comprised of invertebrate feeders while three species (Greenland shark, Atlantic cod, and Parr’s snailfish) are facultative piscivorous. However the vast majority of the fish biomass for the region is likely polar cod which can feed on zooplankton under the ice. The low observed abundance of this species may be explained by the lack of sea ice near FJL during our expedition.

Species endemic to the Arctic accounted for three quarters of the nearshore species, the majority of which are common at high latitudes and circumpolar in the Arctic (Chernova, 2011). The distribution of some species (e.g., Arctic eelpout, Anderson’s pout, Esipov’s pout, and McAlpin’s smooth lumpfish) is currently not fully known. The presence of larvae and young-of-year of many of the nearshore fishes suggests as least some local spawning and self-recruitment. The nearshore waters around FJL are important as nursery habitat for a number of fishes found in deeper water.

Compared with much of the Barents Sea, the fish fauna of FJL is depauperate. The waters around FJL are at or below freezing year round and the littoral zone is covered by ice during much of the year. As a result, nearshore fishes are restricted to a zone between 6 and 25 m, in areas dominated mainly by macrophytes.

Several species may only spend a portion of their lives in FJL. The Greenland sharkS. microcephalus is nomadic. FJL is not recognized as a nursery or feeding area for young Atlantic cod and capelin, but favorable currents and oceanographic conditions may allow these species to survive until they migrate to spawning areas towards the south and west. The Arctic cod,Arctogadus glacialis, is a cryopelagic (sympagic) species that occurs south of FJL, as well as northward to the North Pole (Andriashev & Chernova, 1994;Chernova, 2011). The lack of pack ice around FJL during our expedition may account for the absence of this species from our list. Some mesopelagic fishes are also non-residents. Glacier LanternfishBenthosema glaciale (Borkin, 1986) and White BarracudinaArctozenus risso occur south and west of the archipelago, but the extreme environment conditions of FJL likely prevent these species from reproducing in these waters. Many of the other species that are known from FJL occur in >34 m and therefore not encountered on our surveys.

Trawl catches around FJL in depths 100–600 m have recorded 43 fish species from 15 families. Most are primarily demersal, non-migrating species with the exception of the commercially important black halibut, which spawns on the western continental slope of the Barents Sea. Nursery and feeding areas for black halibut occur west of FJL in the Franz Victoria Trough, as well as in the Voronin and St. Anna troughs to the east. With the exception of black halibut, there are currently no fish species in commercially-exploitable abundance around FJL.

Abundance of FJL fishes

Notes published from the Jackson–Harmsworth Expedition of 1894–97 state: “Though angling with line and hook was tried, it proved unsuccessful; and in order to obtain specimens of fish, it became necessary to stand on the shore and wait for the birds that came flying in from the distant open water with fish in their mouths. These birds were promptly shot, and came tumbling down with the fish still in their grip. This is an instance, I fear, of highway robbery with violence to the person, but science condones much”. Later in the text they state: “Fishing with line met with no success, but many specimens were taken from birds, and are preserved and brought back” (Brice & Fisher, 1896).

Our results confirm that fishes in FJL are not abundant. The density of fishes observed during dives was very low. On average, only a few individuals were observed on any dive (N = 68). These low densities likely reflect very low standing stock of benthic fishes, but also related to the fact that many of the individuals were extremely cryptic, occurring on the underside of kelp fronds or hiding within rocks and/or kelp holdfasts. Underwater visual surveys of fishes off West Greenland yielded densities of 0.03 fishes m−2 (Gremillet et al., 2004) and are typical for other Arctic rocky shores (Hoff, 2000;Born & Böcher, 2001). Results of our beach seine efforts confirm fish scarcity. In 56 hauls at 4 locations no fishes were collected and no fishes were observed in this habitat. There was continuous daylight during the entire expedition so it is unclear if the abundance patterns we observed are similar during other times of the year. However due to sea ice conditions during the winter months, abundances are likely highest during the summer period when our sampling was conducted.

The blood serum of most fishes freezes at < −0.07 °C (Holmes & Donaldson, 1969) and therefore the shallow water or extremely cold, ice-laden deep waters surrounding FJL are inhospitable for most species. Fish that live in the polar oceans survive at low temperatures by virtue of ‘antifreeze’ plasma proteins in the blood that bind to ice crystals and prevent these crystals from growing (Fletcher, Hew & Davies, 2001;Marshall, Fletcher & Davies, 2004). The blood of the cryopelagic fishes, such as NotothenioidsPagothenia borchgrevinki andDissostichus mawsoni (Perciformes) in Antarctic and cod speciesB. saida andA. glacialis in the Arctic, contains glycoproteins that serve as antifreeze agents.

No commercial fishing occurs in FJL due to extensive ice cover for most of the year and the absence of commercially abundant fishes. The Atlantic cod, haddock, capelin, red-fishes, wolf fishes, and flat fishes either are absent from FJL or occur at densities too low for commercial exploitation. Polar cod are common in FJL waters, with enormous shoals sometimes observed, but the low value of this species has precluded commercial exploitation. Polar cod are important ecologically in high-Arctic areas. They are an essential link in the cryopelagic food web by grazing on under-ice zooplankton and in turn are a major food component of many seabirds and marine mammals (Bradstreet et al., 1986;Finley, Bradstreet & Miller, 1990;Welch, Crawford & Hop, 1993). Many questions on the biology and ecology of arctic fish still remain unanswered.

Trends assuming climate change scenarios

The climate projections for the eastern Arctic show a warming that will cause a shift from sea-ice algae-benthos-dominated to zooplankton-dominated communities (Bates & Mathis, 2009). Such a fundamental shift may have negative consequences on large marine carnivores (e.g., seabirds and marine mammals), but have a positive influence on the abundance of smaller carnivores (e.g., fishes), because the average body size of prey will decrease substantially (Karnovsky et al., 2003).

Until recently, the north-eastern Barents Sea has had permanent ice-cover, but during the last decade the entire shelf sea has been ice-free during the summer months (Johannesen et al., 2012a). A retreat and thinning of the ice cover in the Barents Sea likely will result in the northern portion becoming more Atlantic in character, with a higher productivity at the sea floor (Cochrane et al., 2009). The northern fish fauna currently has low biomass, but a shift towards more productive Atlantic water will likely result in an overall increase in benthic biomass to the north.

A northern shift in the penetration of Atlantic water will likely make the area more similar in faunal structure and ecosystem function to the southern parts of the Barents Sea. The Barents Sea today supports large commercial fisheries, and a potential climate-driven increase in their harvestable areas is of high social and economic interest. Under warming conditions, trophic interactions in the ecosystem could weaken as a result of increased diversity at each trophic level caused by range expansion of species found in warmer areas. Cod larvae are spread by currents from spawning grounds throughout the Barents Sea. As the waters around FJL warm, Atlantic cod and other boreal and sub-Arctic species will likely become more abundant. The impact of fisheries on the Arctic, which can be expected to increase, as industrial fisheries move into a warming Arctic following the invasion of boreal species. The lack of basic knowledge regarding fish biology and habitat interactions in the north, complicated by scaling issues and uncertainty in future climate projections limits our preparedness to meet the challenges of climate change in the Arctic with respect to fish and fisheries (Reist et al., 2006).

Supplemental Information

Table S1. Fishes recorded from Franz Josef Land.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.692/supp-1

Abbreviations

dp

depth

coll.

collector

I.

Island

lc

head length

spl

sample

st

station

sp

specimen

SL

standard length (from tip of snout to bases of caudal-fin rays)

TL

total length

Fins

A

anal

D

dorsal

C

caudal

P

pectoral

V

ventral

Format of dates: day, month, year

DC

drop camera observations

MC

materials collected

VO

visual observations

Funding Statement

Funding for this work was provided by National Geographic, Blancpain, Davidoff Cool Water, the Russian Arctic National Park, the Russian Geographical Society, and the State Nature Reserve—Franz Josef Land. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Sample numbers are as follows: ZIN collection number (6-013) and fish identification number. For example, fish 22 is denoted as: ZIN 6-013/22.

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

Natalia V. Chernova is an employee of the Zoological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences. Alan M. Friedlander, Alan Turchik and Enric Sala are members of the National Geographic Society.

Author Contributions

Natalia V. Chernova, Alan M. Friedlander, Alan Turchik and Enric Sala conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Approval to conduct research on vertebrate animals was granted by the Russian Federation Ministry of Education and Science Approval Ref. No. 14-368 of 06.05.2013.

Field Study Permissions

The following information was supplied relating to field study approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Approval to conduct field studies was granted by the Russian Federation Ministry of Education and Science Approval Ref. No. 14-368 of 06.05.2013 permission to the Russian Arctic National Park.

References

  • Andriashev (1939).Andriashev AP. Essay of zoogeography and origin of the fish fauna of the Bering Sea and neighboring waters. Leningrad: Leningrad State University Publishing House; 1939. 188 [In Russian] [Google Scholar]
  • Andriashev (1964a).Andriashev AP. Fishes of the northern seas of the USSR. Israel Program of Scientific Translations. 1964a;836:1–617. [In Russian] [Google Scholar]
  • Andriashev (1964b).Andriashev AP. The list of fishes collected by the expedition onboard the ice-cutter F. Litke (1955) northward of Franz Josef Land and Spitsbergen. Trudy Arcticheskogo i Antarcticheskogo N I In-ta. 1964b;259:373–377. [In Russian] [Google Scholar]
  • Andriashev & Chernova (1994).Andriashev AP, Chernova NV. Annotated list of fishlike vertebrates and fish of the Arctic seas and adjacent waters. Journal of Ichthyology. 1994;35:81–123. [In Russian] [Google Scholar]
  • Andriashev, Mukhomediyarov & Pavshtiks (1980).Andriashev AP, Mukhomediyarov BF, Pavshtiks EA. Biology of the Central Arctic Basin. Moscow: Nauka Publishing House; 1980. On mass aggregations of cryopelagic cod fishes (Boreogadus saida and Arctogadus glacialis) in the North-Pole areas of the Arctic; pp. 196–211. [In Russian] [Google Scholar]
  • Barr (1994).Barr S. Franz Josef Land. Oslo: Norsk Polarinstitutt; 1994. 90. [Google Scholar]
  • Bates & Mathis (2009).Bates NR, Mathis JT. The Arctic Ocean marine carbon cycle: evaluation of air–sea CO2 exchanges, ocean acidification impacts and potential feedbacks. Biogeosciences. 2009;6:2433–2459. doi: 10.5194/bg-6-2433-2009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Borkin (1983).Borkin IV. Study of biology, morphology and physiology of hydrobionts. Apatity: Kola Branch of the AN USSR; 1983. Results of fish-fauna study in the area of Franz Josef Land and northward of Spitsbergen; pp. 34–42. [In Russian] [Google Scholar]
  • Borkin (1986).Borkin IV. Record of Glacier lanternfish Benthosema glaciale in Franz Josef Land area. Biologiya Morya. 1986;(3):63–64. [In Russian] [Google Scholar]
  • Borkin (1993).Borkin IV. Environment and ecosystems of the Franz Josef Land (Archipelago and shelf) Apatity: Izd. Kolskogo nauch tsentra AN SSSR; 1993. Fishes inhabiting coastal waters; pp. 188–195. [Google Scholar]
  • Born & Böcher (2001).Born EW, Böcher J. The ecology of Greenland. Nuuk: Atuakkiorfik Education; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • Bradstreet et al. (1986).Bradstreet MSW, Finley KJ, Sekerak AD, Griffiths WB, Evans CR, Fabijan MF, Stallard HE. Aspects of the feeding biology of Arctic cod (Boreogadus saida) and its importance in Arctic marine food chains. Canadian Technical Reports. Fisheries and Aquatic Science No. 1491. 1986 193.
  • Brice & Fisher (1896).Brice AM, Fisher H. The Jackson–Harmsworth polar expedition, notes of the last year’s work. The Geographical Journal. 1896;8:543–564. doi: 10.2307/1774217. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Burmakin (1957).Burmakin EV. Fishes of the Soviet Arctic islands. Trudy Arcticheskogo i Antarcticheskogo N I In-ta. 1957;205:127–151. [In Russian] [Google Scholar]
  • Camerano (1903).Camerano L. Osservazioni scientifiche esequite durante la Spedizione polare di S.A.R. Luigi Amedeo di Savoia duca degli Abruzzi, 1899–1900. Genova: Ulrico Hoepli, Editore-Librajo della real casa Milano. Tipografia Del R. Istituto Idrografico; 1903. Osservazioni intorno al “Gadus saida Lepechin”, della Baia di Teplitz; pp. 609–620. [Separate, 12 p.] [Google Scholar]
  • Chernova (1989).Chernova NV. Ecology and bio-resources of the Kara Sea. Apatity: Izd. Kolskogo nauch tsentra AN SSSR; 1989. Snailfishes; pp. 104–120. [In Russian] [Google Scholar]
  • Chernova (1991).Chernova NV. Snailfishes of the Euro-Asian Arctic. Apatity: Izd. Kolskogo nauch tsentra AN SSSR; 1991. 111 [In Russian] [Google Scholar]
  • Chernova (1993).Chernova NV. Snailfishes. In: Matishov G.G., editor. Environment and ecosystems of Franz Josef Land (Archipelago and shelf) Apatity: Assoc. of Authors. Kola Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 1993. pp. 195–197. [Google Scholar]
  • Chernova (1998a).Chernova NV. A new species Gymnelus andersoni sp. nova, from the Arctic seas with re-validation of the species status of G. retrodorsalis Le Danois and G. pauciporus Anderson (Fam. Zoarcidae) Journal of Ichthyology. 1998a;38(6):737–744. [In Russian] [Google Scholar]
  • Chernova (1998b).Chernova NV. Reestablishment of the validity of species Gymnelus bilabrus Andriashev 1937 with characteristics of species G. viridis verified (Fabricius, 1780) (Zoarcidae) Journal of Ichthyology. 1998b;38:163–169. [In Russian] [Google Scholar]
  • Chernova (1999a).Chernova NV. Four new species of Gymnelus (Zoarcidae) from the Arctic region. Journal of Ichthyology. 1999a;39:343–352. [In Russian] [Google Scholar]
  • Chernova (1999b).Chernova NV. New species Gymnelus knipowitschi from the Arctic Ocean and a redescription of G. hemifasciatus Andriashev (Zoarcidae) Journal of Ichthyology. 1999b;39:5–13. [In Russian] [Google Scholar]
  • Chernova (2007).Chernova NV. Modern studies of fish fauna of Arctic and Southern Seas of European part of Russia. Apatity: Izd. Kolskogo nauch tsentra RAN; 2007. Fish fauna of Franz Josef Land and the northern part of Navaya Zemlya; pp. 55–74. [In Russian] [Google Scholar]
  • Chernova (2008).Chernova NV. Systematics and phylogeny of the genus Liparis (Liparidae, Scorpaeniformes) Journal of Ichthyology. 2008;48(Suppl):831–852. doi: 10.1134/S0032945208100020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Chernova (2011).Chernova NV. Distribution patterns and chorological analysis of fish fauna of the arctic region. Journal of Ichthyology. 2011;51:825–924. doi: 10.1134/S0032945211100043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Cochrane et al. (2009).Cochrane SK, Denisenko SG, Renaud PE, Emblow CS, Ambrose WG, Jr, Ellingsen IH, Skarðhamar J. Benthic macrofauna and productivity regimes in the Barents Sea—ecological implications in a changing Arctic. Journal of Sea Research. 2009;61:222–233. doi: 10.1016/j.seares.2009.01.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Collett & Nansen (1899).Collett R, Nansen F. The Norwegian North Polar expedition, 1893–1896. Scientific results. V. 4. 1899. Account of birds. 54. [Google Scholar]
  • Dolgov (2011).Dolgov AV. Atlas and key for identification of fishes of the Barents Sea. Murmansk: Izd-vo PINRO; 2011. 187. [Google Scholar]
  • Dunbar (1968).Dunbar MJ. Ecological development in polar regions: a study in evolution. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 1968. 199. [Google Scholar]
  • Esipov (1931).Esipov VK. Fishes collected by the expedition to Franz Josef Land in summer 1929. Trudy in-ta po izuch severa. 1931;49:156–165. [In Russian] [Google Scholar]
  • Esipov (1933).Esipov VK. Fishes, collected by the expedition of year 1930 on board of ice steamer G. Sedov to Franz Josef Land and Severnaya Zemlya. Trudy Arcticheskogo i Antarcticheskogo N I In-ta. 1933;8:93–100. [In Russian] [Google Scholar]
  • Finley, Bradstreet & Miller (1990).Finley KJ, Bradstreet MSW, Miller GW. Summer feeding ecology of harp seals (Phoca groenlandicus) in relation to Arctic cod (Boreogadus saida) in the Canadian High Arctic. Polar Biology. 1990;10:609–618. doi: 10.1007/BF00239372. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Fletcher, Hew & Davies (2001).Fletcher GL, Hew CL, Davies PL. Antifreeze proteins of teleost fishes. Annual Review of Physiology. 2001;63:359–390. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.63.1.359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Fossheim, Nilssen & Aschan (2006).Fossheim M, Nilssen EM, Aschan M. Fish assemblages in the Barents Sea. Marine Biology Research. 2006;2:260–269. doi: 10.1080/17451000600815698. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Gremillet et al. (2004).Gremillet D, Kuntz G, Delbar F, Mellet M, Kato A, Robin JP, Chaillon PE, Gendner JP, Lorensten SH, Le Maho Y. Linking the foraging performance of a marine predator to local prey abundance. Functional Ecology. 2004;18:793–801. doi: 10.1111/j.0269-8463.2004.00914.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Hoff (2000).Hoff GR. Biology and ecology of threaded sculpin, Gymnocanthus pistilliger, in the eastern Bering Sea. Fishery Bulletin. 2000;98:711–722. [Google Scholar]
  • Holmes & Donaldson (1969).Holmes WN, Donaldson EM. The body compartments and the distribution of electrolytes. Fish Physiology. 1969;1:1–89. [Google Scholar]
  • Jackson (1899).Jackson FG. A thousand days in the Arctic. Vol. 2. New York and London: Harper & Brothers; 1899. 580 (cited after: Camerano, 1903) [Google Scholar]
  • Johannesen et al. (2012b).Johannesen E, Høines ÅS, Dolgov AV, Fossheim M. Demersal fish assemblages and spatial diversity patterns in the Arctic–Atlantic transition zone in the Barents Sea. PLoS ONE. 2012b;7(4):e692. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Johannesen et al. (2012a).Johannesen E, Ingvaldsen R, Bogstad B, Dalpadado P, Eriksen R, Gjøsæter H, Knutsen T, Skern-Mauritzen M, Stiansen JE. Barents Sea ecosystem state: climate fluctuations, human impact and trophic interactions. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 2012a;69:880–889. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fss046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Karnovsky et al. (2003).Karnovsky NJ, Kwasniewski S, Weslawski JM, Walkusz W, Beszczynska-Möller A. Foraging behaviour of little auks in a heterogeneous environment. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2003;253:289–303. doi: 10.3354/meps253289. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Knipowitch (1901).Knipowitch N. Zoological study on board of ice-breaker Yermak in summer 1901. Ezhegodnik Zoologicheskogo muzeya Imperatorskoy Akademii Nauk. 1901;6(2–3):I–XX. [In Russian] [Google Scholar]
  • Koltun (1964).Koltun VM. Hydrobiologic works of high-arctic expeditions on board of ice-breaker F. Litke and diesel-electric vessels Ob’ and Lena. Trudy Arcticheskogo i Antarcticheskogo N I In-ta. 1964;259:5–12. [In Russian] [Google Scholar]
  • Marshall, Fletcher & Davies (2004).Marshall CB, Fletcher GL, Davies PL. Hyperactive antifreeze protein in a fish. Nature. 2004;429:153–153. doi: 10.1038/429153a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mecklenburg, Møller & Steinke (2010).Mecklenburg CW, Møller PR, Steinke D. Biodiversity of arctic marine fishes: taxonomy and zoogeography. Marine Biodiversity. 2010;41:109–140. doi: 10.1007/s12526-010-0070-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Mel’nikov & Chernova (2013a).Mel’nikov A, Chernova NV. Characteristics of under-ice swarming of polar cod Boreogadus saida (Gadidae) in the central Arctic ocean. Journal of Ichthyology. 2013a;53(1):22–30. [In Russian] [Google Scholar]
  • Mel’nikov & Chernova (2013b).Mel’nikov IA, Chernova NV. Under-ice swarming of polar cod in the North-Pole area. Priroda. 2013b;1:49–53. [In Russian] [Google Scholar]
  • Nansen, Johansen & Nordahl (1900).Nansen F, Johansen H, Nordahl B. Fra ghiacci e tenebre. La spedizione polare norvegese 1893–1896. 1900. Narrata da Fridtjof Nansen, seguita dalla relazione del Capitano del Fram Otto. [Google Scholar]
  • Payer (1878).Payer J. L’expedition du Tegetthoff. Voyage de découvertes aux 80°–83°degrés de latitude Nord. 1878. Traduit de l’allemand par J. Gourdault. Parigi, Hachette et C. 381 (cited after: Camerano, 1903) [Google Scholar]
  • Reist et al. (2006).Reist JD, Wrona FJ, Prowse TD, Power M, Dempson JB, Beamish RJ, King JR, Carmichael TJ, Sawatzky CD. General effects of climate change on Arctic fishes and fish populations. AMBIO. 2006;35:370–380. doi: 10.1579/0044-7447(2006)35[370:GEOCCO]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Savin (1977).Savin SM. The history of the Earth’s surface temperature during the past 100 million years. Annual Reviews of Earth and Planetary Sciences. 1977;5:319–355. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ea.05.050177.001535. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Schauer et al. (2002).Schauer U, Loeng H, Rudels B, Ozhigin VK, Dieck W. Atlantic water flow through the Barents and Kara Seas. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers. 2002;49:2281–2298. doi: 10.1016/S0967-0637(02)00125-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Stiansen & Filin (2008).Stiansen JE, Filin AA, editors. Joint PINRO/IMR report on the state of the Barents Sea ecosystem in 2007, with expected situation and considerations for management. Bergen: Institute of Marine Research; 2008. (IMR-PINRO joint report series 2008(1)). 185. [Google Scholar]
  • Stiansen et al. (2009).Stiansen JE, Korneev O, Titov O, Arneberg P, editors; Filin A, Hansen JR, Høines Å, Marasaev S, guest editors. Joint Norwegian-Russian environmental status 2008. Report on the Barents Sea Ecosystem. Part II—Complete report. 2009. (IMR/PINRO joint report series). (3), 375. [Google Scholar]
  • Svetovidov (1948).Svetovidov AN. Fauna of the USSR. V. IX. No 4. Moscow-Leningrad: Izd-vo Akademii Nauk SSSR; 1948. Gadiformes. 224 pp. [In Russian] [Google Scholar]
  • Wassmann et al. (2006).Wassmann P, Reigstad M, Haug T, Rudels B, Carroll ML, Hop H, Wing Gabrielsen G, Falk-Petersen S, Denisenko SG, Arashkevich E, Slagstad D, Pavlova O. Food webs and carbon flux in the Barents Sea. Progress in Oceanography. 2006;71:232–287. doi: 10.1016/j.pocean.2006.10.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Welch, Crawford & Hop (1993).Welch HE, Crawford RE, Hop H. Occurrence of Arctic Cod (Boreogadus saida) schools and their vulnerability to predation in the Canadian High Arctic. Arctic. 1993;46:331–339. [Google Scholar]
  • Wienerroither et al. (2011).Wienerroither R, Johannesen E, Langøy H, Eriksen KB, Wenneck TdL, Høines Å, Bjelland O, Dolgov A, Prozorkevich D, Prokhorova T, Drevetnyak K, Byrkjedal I, Langhelle G. Atlas of the Barents Sea Fishes. 2011. (IMR/PINRO joint report series 1-2011). 273. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1. Fishes recorded from Franz Josef Land.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.692/supp-1

Articles from PeerJ are provided here courtesy ofPeerJ, Inc

ACTIONS

RESOURCES

[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2025 Movatter.jp