Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Search in PMCSearch
  • View on publisher site icon
As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more:PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logo
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Aug 1.

Inflammation and gastrointestinalCandida colonization

Carol A Kumamoto1,*
1Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Tufts University, 136 Harrison Ave., Boston, MA 02111 USA
*

Address for correspondence: Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Tufts University, 136 Harrison Ave., Boston, MA 02111 USA; phone: 617-636-0404; FAX 617-636-0337;carol.kumamoto@tufts.edu

Issue date 2011 Aug.

© 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PMCID: PMC3163673  NIHMSID: NIHMS316324  PMID:21802979
The publisher's version of this article is available atCurr Opin Microbiol

SUMMARY

Candida organisms commonly colonize the human gastrointestinal tract as a component of the resident microbiota. Their presence is generally benign. Recent studies, however, show that high levelCandida colonization is associated with several diseases of the gastrointestinal tract. Further, results from animal models argue thatCandida colonization delays healing of inflammatory lesions and that inflammation promotes colonization. These effects may create a vicious cycle in which low-level inflammation promotes fungal colonization and fungal colonization promotes further inflammation. Both inflammatory bowel disease and gastrointestinalCandida colonization are associated with elevated levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-17. Therefore, effects on IL-17 levels may underlie the ability ofCandida colonization to enhance inflammation. BecauseCandida is a frequent colonizer, these effects have the potential to impact many people.

Introduction

Colonization of the human gastrointestinal (GI) tract by opportunistic fungal pathogens such asCandida albicans is significant becauseC. albicans infections are believed to arise from commensal organisms [1,2]. In a recent study that supports this view, Miranda et al [3] recoveredCandida organisms from the blood of patients with candidiasis and compared those organisms to organisms cultured from the rectum or skin of the same patient. In most cases ofC. albicans candidemia, the strain identified in a patient’s blood sample and the strain identified in the same patient’s rectum sample were identical. These findings support the model that commensal organisms residing in the GI tract can escape from this niche and reach the bloodstream. Interestingly, in the same study,Candida parapsilosis blood stream isolates did not correspond to isolates detected in rectum or oral samples [3]. Most of these cases ofC. parapsilosis candidemia were catheter-associated infections in neonates. As previously noted [1], these types of infections have a different origin and generally do not arise from gut flora.

In addition to its relevance as the reservoir for disease-causing organisms, the GI tract is an important niche in the lifecycle ofC. albicans because this organism does not have a significant environmental reservoir. Rather,C. albicans is almost always found associated with humans or other mammals, typically in the GI tract, genitourinary tract or on skin [2,4]. In the GI tract,C. albicans encounters and responds to varying features of the physical environment such as pH, oxygen levels and nutrient levels [5].C. albicans also responds to secretions produced in the GI tract such as bile [6]. These findings argue thatC. albicans is well adapted for growth in the GI tract.

Analyses of factors that regulateC. albicans colonization show that the host immune system (e.g. [7–14]), bacterial competitors [7,15–19], and fungal gene expression [5,17,20–23] impact GI tract colonization by the organism. Colonization levels thus reflect an interplay between host activities, bacterial activities and fungal activities.

The remainder of this review will focus on the effects thatCandida colonizing the mammalian GI tract exerts on its host. In mice,C. abicans colonization of the stomach results in expansion of regulatory T cell populations [24] and regulatory T cells are associated with immunosuppressive effects on the host. However, in a setting of inflammation,Candida colonization appears to exacerbate inflammation. Several recent studies will be reviewed below.

Candida colonization is associated with diseases of the GI tract

Candida colonization in patients suffering from GI tract disease has been documented in several situations. As shown inTable 1, patients with different diseases affecting the GI tract were colonized withCandida more frequently than control individuals.

Table 1.

Fungal colonization in patients with GI tract disease

Disease conditionSample culturedPatients significantly colonized byCandidaa
Number/total (%)		Controls significantly colonized byCandidaa
Number/total (%)		p valueReference
Crohn’s disease, familialStool47b/107 (43.9%)13b/59 (22%)<0.05[25]
Ulcerative colitis (>5 yrs duration)Stool or brush smear of mucosa33/47 (70%)1/12 (8.3%)0.0005[34]
Ulcerative colitisStool36/42 (86%)N.R.N.A.[33]
Gastric ulcersGastric biopsy or brush smear51/94 (54.2%)4/92 (4%)N.R.[37]
Duodenal ulcerBiopsy or brush sample(large duodenal ulcer)
8/10 (80%)		(small duodenal ulcer)
27/70 (38.6%)		<0.05[36]
Perforated ulcerPeritoneal fluid9/22 (41%)N.A.N.A.[62]
Perforated ulcer peritonitisPeritoneal fluid23/62 (37%)N.A.N.A.[63]
a

Measured by culture

b

C. albicans

N.R., not reported

N.A., not applicable

Crohn’s disease

The inflammation that is characteristic of Crohn’s disease (CD), a type of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), is thought to arise as a result of dysregulated immune interactions between the host and components of the intestinal microbial flora. To test for an association betweenCandida colonization and CD, a large-scale study of families in which multiple members suffered from CD was conducted [25]. The authors studied both CD patients and their unaffected, healthy relatives (HR). Healthy relatives often exhibit characteristics that have been noted in patients such as increased intestinal permeability or defects in oral tolerance [26–32], but they do not have clinical disease. HRs are therefore less likely to have been treated with medications that might increase the likelihood ofCandida colonization, such as antibiotics and immunomodulators.

Stool samples from both patients (Table 1) and HR more frequently contained significant levels ofC. albicans than stool samples from control individuals, individuals who lived in the same geographic region and had no history of IBD [25]. In addition to increased frequency of colonization, patients and HR carriedC. albicans at higher levels than control individuals. A similarity in colonization between patients and HR was observed when family members lived together in the same household and when they did not. Therefore, similarity in carriage within families was not simply due to a shared environment. The authors suggest that subclinical inflammation is present in HRs; this effect could influenceC. albicans colonization. Thus, this study demonstrated an association between familial Crohn’s disease and intestinal colonization byC. albicans.

Ulcerative colitis

Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), another form of IBD, are also frequently colonized byCandida [33,34]. For example, in one study, many patients with long standing disease (duration >5 yr) had high level colonization detected in stool or brush smears from inflamed mucosa (Table 1)[34]. Among the control group, individuals with diarrhea but not UC, only one person was highly colonized (Table 1). Further, in patients with active disease who were colonized withCandida, treatment with the antifungal drug fluconazole led to a reduction in clinical signs and in the size of inflammatory lesions. Although these effects may be direct or indirect, the results argue that reducingCandida colonization reduced disease severity.

Gastric ulcers

Candida organisms colonize ulcers, particularly when the ulcers are large or perforated (Table 1). In several studies,Candida organisms were cultured from gastric biopsies, brush samples of mucosa or peritoneal fluid. Colonization was observed more frequently in older patients [35,36] and in patients with hypoacidity [36]. In addition, the rate of decrease in ulcer diameter, an indication of ulcer healing, was slower in patients whose stomachs were significantly colonized byCandida in comparison to patients who were not [37]. These studies of UC patients and gastric ulcer patients show that significant colonization withCandida is associated with more severe disease.

To summarize, higher level colonization byCandida was associated with several diseases of the GI tract. Although some of the studies are small and lack sufficient numbers of controls, the results of several studies reinforce each other and support the overall conclusion.

C. albicans colonization inhibits the healing of inflammatory lesions in animal models

To elucidate the interplay betweenCandida and the host during disease, animal models of GI tract disease have been employed. For studies of ulcers, rats or mice are treated with ulcer inducing chemicals such as cysteamine, a compound that concentrates in the duodenum producing duodenal ulcers [38].

When rats received cysteamine treatment andC. albicans inoculation on the same day, almost all rats (16/17) developed perforated duodenal ulcers [38]. Rats who received cysteamine but noCandida exhibited perforated ulcers at a lower frequency (4/15; p<0.01). The area and depth of the ulcers were also greater in the presence ofC. albicans than in its absence. Rats receivingC. albicans alone without cysteamine did not develop ulcers. Therefore, in this model, ulcers were more severe whenC. albicans was present.

In a subsequent study,C. albicans was administered to rats beginning 3 days after cysteamine treatment [39]. The duodenum of these rats was examined several days later, when ulcer healing should have begun. Duodenal ulcers were observed in 70% of the rats treated with both cysteamine andC. albicans compared to 33% of rats that received only cysteamine (p<0.05). The area of the ulcers was significantly larger in the animals that received both cysteamine andC. albicans. Ulcer scarring was observed in animals that did not receiveC. albicans, but rarely in animals that receivedC. albicans. Therefore, the presence ofC. albicans delayed ulcer healing in this animal model.

A study of gastric ulcers induced by treatment with acetic acid showed similar effects [40]. Mice that receivedC. albicans exhibited less ulcer healing at day 25 in comparison with mice that did not receiveC. albicans. Collectively, these results indicate thatC. albicans colonization increases the severity of ulcers and inhibits their healing.

IBD has been modeled by treating animals with chemicals or by using mutant strains of mice. For example, dextran sulfate sodium (DSS), which injures epithelial cells and causes inflammation, or trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS), which produces ulceration, have been used to produce colitis.

Poulain and coworkers treated mice with DSS and some mice were also inoculated withC. albicans by oral gavage [41]. The presence ofC. albicans led to a modest increase in disease severity. For example, in the presence ofC. albicans, the mice exhibited severe inflammation with massive influx of neutrophils and tissue destruction. Tissue levels of myeloperoxidase (MPO), indicative of neutrophils in the tissue, were elevated in mice that receivedC. albicans compared to those who did not. Tissue expression of the cytokine TNF-α was also higher in DSS-treated mice that receivedC. albicans.

TNBS-treated rats inoculated withC. albicans exhibited a larger area of colonic damage, and increased MPO activity in colon tissue [34]. When fluconazole was administered to the rats along withC. albicans, the damage and MPO activity were reduced. Thus, the presence ofC. albicans enhanced colitis in these animal models. Taken together, these studies show thatC. albicans exacerbates damage and delays healing of inflammatory lesions in animal models.

Inflammation promotesC. albicans colonization of the GI tract

Interestingly, Jawhara et al showed that following oral gavage,C. albicans could successfully colonize the GI tract of mice treated with DSS while mice not treated with DSS were not colonized [41]. With conventionally reared mice,C. albicans usually fails to colonize the GI tract unless the mice are treated with antibiotics, e.g. [7,15–19]. Therefore, like antibiotic treatment, GI tract inflammation may perturb the resident bacterial community, allowingC. albicans to colonize.

The strategy of taking advantage of the effects of inflammation to promote colonization is used effectively by bacterial pathogens. For example, the presence of the enteric pathogenSalmonella typhimurium causes inflammation and modifies the resident microbiota; these effects promoteS. typhimurium colonization [42]. A mutant strain ofS. typhimurium that fails to provoke inflammation and modify the microbiota is defective in colonizing. Enhancement of colonization through alteration of the microbiota thus represents a successful strategy for establishing colonization in the intestine.

C. albicans does not appear to evoke sufficient levels of inflammation to colonize the mouse GI tract successfully without antibiotic treatment. However, the organism is able to exploit inflammation stimulated through other mechanisms to enhance its ability to colonize.

Since inflammation increases the likelihood of significantCandida colonization andCandida colonization reduces healing of lesions, these effects would produce a vicious cycle. The presence of inflammation alters bacterial colonization and the activities of the host, creating conditions that favor both high levelCandida colonization and exacerbation of disease.

Does high-levelC. albicans colonization trigger IBD?

CD patients and HRs share many characteristics, such as increased intestinal permeability or defects in oral tolerance [26–32], yet HRs do not have disease. To date, no single factor that explains why some people develop CD and others do not has been identified. It is clear that development of CD requires the microbiota. In human patients surgically treated for CD, recurrence of the disease was not observed when the fecal stream was diverted but recurred after fecal transit was restored [43]. In laboratory studies, mice that are genetically susceptible to colitis but are germ free do not develop colitis [44]. Upon colonization with bacterial flora, these mice develop disease. Thus, it is thought that in CD patients, homeostasis between the normal intestinal flora and the host has somehow broken down so that components of the commensal flora evoke an aberrant immune response [45].

It is most likely that some individuals are highly susceptible to CD because of a combination of genetic and environmental factors. In these individuals, one or more triggering event(s) occur that can result in the development of CD. Once the triggering event occurs, immune responses that culminate in recurrent inflammatory conditions are set in motion.

The nature of the putative triggering events is not known. One possible triggering event may be antibiotic use. Analysis of a large database of patient records showed a statistically significant association between antibiotic use, especially tetracycline use, and subsequent diagnosis with CD [46]. Antibiotic use may alter both the total level of bacteria colonizing the intestinal tract and the composition of organisms. Antibiotic use also results in increasedCandida colonization. Because different organisms differ in their propensity to lead to inflammation [45], these effects of antibiotics may influence the amount or type of stimulation that the immune system receives and affect inflammation.

Recently, attention has focused on the role of a subset of T-helper cells, Th17 cells, in IBD (recently reviewed in [47–51]. Biopsies of inflamed mucosa or blood cells from IBD patients produce higher levels of IL-17, a cytokine secreted by Th17 cells [52–55]. Increased levels of IL-17 are also produced by gastric ulcer biopsies in comparison to non-ulcer tissue [56]. Further, IL-23, a cytokine that promotes the expansion and maintenance of Th17 cells, is required for induction of T-cell mediated colitis in murine models [57–59]. These findings favor a role for IL-23 and IL-17 in IBD.

Intriguingly, colonization byC. albicans increases IL-17 and IL-23 production by murine gastric and oral tissues [14,60,61]. Therefore,Candida colonization could enhance inflammation by increasing levels of these cytokines. High-level colonization byCandida occurring in a susceptible individual with subclinical inflammation could thus exacerbate inflammation and trigger CD, a possibility discussed by Standaert-Vitse et al [25]. Further studies will be required to investigate this possibility.

Concluding remarks

As the studies discussed above show, high-levelCandida colonization is frequently observed in ulcer and IBD patients. Frequent colonization may, in part, reflect modern treatments for these conditions, which include administration of drugs such as antibiotics or immunomodulators. In addition, the presence ofCandida delays healing and exacerbates disease. This vicious cycle in which inflammation promotesCandida colonization andCandida colonization delays healing may impact many patients. The effects of antifungal treatment on UC patients [34] argue that reduction in fungal colonization could be beneficial for colonized patients. Interestingly, administration of the probioticLactobacillus acidophilus reduced symptoms of UC in human patients [34] and reduced ulcer size in acetic-acid treated rats that receivedC. albicans and an inhibitor of gastric acid secretion [37,40]. These findings suggest that by antagonizingCandida colonization, modulation of the bacterial microbiota could provide beneficial effects for patients. Further studies to discern the mechanisms for the effect of inflammation onCandida colonization and the effect ofCandida on inflammatory lesions represent exciting directions for future research.

HIGHLIGHTS.

  1. High level colonization withCandida is more common in patients with GI tract disease

  2. In an animal model, intestinal inflammation promotesCandida colonization.

  3. Do interactions between inflammation andCandida colonization create a vicious cycle?

Acknowledgments

I thank Drs. Daniel Poulain and Susan Hadley for review of the manuscript and discussion of ideas. I am also grateful to Drs. Joel Weinstock, Joan Mecsas, and Linc Sonenshein for helpful discussion. Research in my laboratory is supported by grant AI087194 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Nucci M, Anaissie E. Revisiting the source of candidemia: skin or gut? Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33:1959–1967. doi: 10.1086/323759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Odds FC. Candida infections: an overview. Crit Rev Microbiol. 1987;15:1–5. doi: 10.3109/10408418709104444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • *3.Miranda LN, van der Heijden IM, Costa SF, Sousa AP, Sienra RA, Gobara S, Santos CR, Lobo RD, Pessoa VP, Jr, Levin AS. Candida colonisation as a source for candidaemia. J Hosp Infect. 2009;72:9–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.02.009. Use of molecular typing methods to compare strains isolated from a patient’s blood with strains isolated from other body sites showed that Candida albicans blood isolates were frequently related to rectal isolates but Candida parapsilosis strains were generally not related. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Soll DR, Galask R, Schmid J, Hanna C, Mac K, Morrow B. Genetic dissimilarity of commensal strains of Candida spp. carried in different anatomical locations of the same healthy women. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29:1702–1710. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.8.1702-1710.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rosenbach A, Dignard D, Pierce JV, Whiteway M, Kumamoto CA. Adaptations of Candida albicans for growth in the mammalian intestinal tract. Eukaryot Cell. 2010;9:1075–1086. doi: 10.1128/EC.00034-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vu B, Essmann M, Larsen B. Sodium choleate (NaCho) effects on Candida albicans: implications for its role as a gastrointestinal tract inhabitant. Mycopathologia. 2010;169:183–191. doi: 10.1007/s11046-009-9248-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Helstrom PB, Balish E. Effect of oral tetracycline, the microbial flora, and the athymic state on gastrointestinal colonization and infection of BALB/c mice with Candida albicans. Infect Immun. 1979;23:764–774. doi: 10.1128/iai.23.3.764-774.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.De Luca A, Montagnoli C, Zelante T, Bonifazi P, Bozza S, Moretti S, D’Angelo C, Vacca C, Boon L, Bistoni F, et al. Functional yet balanced reactivity to Candida albicans requires TRIF, MyD88, and IDO-dependent inhibition of Rorc. J Immunol. 2007;179:5999–6008. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.9.5999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Del Sero G, Mencacci A, Cenci E, d’Ostiani CF, Montagnoli C, Bacci A, Mosci P, Kopf M, Romani L. Antifungal type 1 responses are upregulated in IL-10-deficient mice. Microbes Infect. 1999;1:1169–1180. doi: 10.1016/s1286-4579(99)00245-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cantorna MT, Balish E. Mucosal and systemic candidiasis in congenitally immunodeficient mice. Infect Immun. 1990;58:1093–1100. doi: 10.1128/iai.58.4.1093-1100.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jones-Carson J, Vazquez-Torres A, Warner T, Balish E. Disparate requirement for T cells in resistance to mucosal and acute systemic candidiasis. Infect Immun. 2000;68:2363–2365. doi: 10.1128/iai.68.4.2363-2365.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Vazquez-Torres A, Jones-Carson J, Warner T, Balish E. Nitric oxide enhances resistance of SCID mice to mucosal candidiasis. J Infect Dis. 1995;172:192–198. doi: 10.1093/infdis/172.1.192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bellocchio S, Montagnoli C, Bozza S, Gaziano R, Rossi G, Mambula SS, Vecchi A, Mantovani A, Levitz SM, Romani L. The contribution of the Toll-like/IL-1 receptor superfamily to innate and adaptive immunity to fungal pathogens in vivo. J Immunol. 2004;172:3059–3069. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.5.3059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zelante T, De Luca A, Bonifazi P, Montagnoli C, Bozza S, Moretti S, Belladonna ML, Vacca C, Conte C, Mosci P, et al. IL-23 and the Th17 pathway promote inflammation and impair antifungal immune resistance. Eur J Immunol. 2007;37:2695–2706. doi: 10.1002/eji.200737409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ekenna O, Sherertz RJ. Factors affecting colonization and dissemination of Candida albicans from the gastrointestinal tract of mice. Infect Immun. 1987;55:1558–1563. doi: 10.1128/iai.55.7.1558-1563.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mellado E, Cuenca-Estrella M, Regadera J, Gonzalez M, Diaz-Guerra TM, Rodriguez-Tudela JL. Sustained gastrointestinal colonization and systemic dissemination by Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis and Candida parapsilosis in adult mice. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2000;38:21–28. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(00)00165-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wiesner SM, Jechorek RP, Garni RM, Bendel CM, Wells CL. Gastrointestinal colonization by Candida albicans mutant strains in antibiotic-treated mice. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2001;8:192–195. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.8.1.192-195.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Clark JD. Influence of antibiotics or certain intestinal bacteria on orally administered Candida albicans in germ-free and conventional mice. Infect Immun. 1971;4:731–737. doi: 10.1128/iai.4.6.731-737.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Samonis G, Anaissie EJ, Bodey GP. Effects of broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents on yeast colonization of the gastrointestinal tracts of mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990;34:2420–2422. doi: 10.1128/aac.34.12.2420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Westwater C, Balish E, Warner TF, Nicholas PJ, Paulling EE, Schofield DA. Susceptibility of gnotobiotic transgenic mice (Tgepsilon26) with combined deficiencies in natural killer cells and T cells to wild-type and hyphal signalling-defective mutants of Candida albicans. J Med Microbiol. 2007;56:1138–1144. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.47110-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sundstrom P, Balish E, Allen CM. Essential role of the Candida albicans transglutaminase substrate, hyphal wall protein 1, in lethal oroesophageal candidiasis in immunodeficient mice. J Infect Dis. 2002;185:521–530. doi: 10.1086/338836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.White SJ, Rosenbach A, Lephart P, Nguyen D, Benjamin A, Tzipori S, Whiteway M, Mecsas J, Kumamoto CA. Self-Regulation of Candida albicans Population Size during GI Colonization. PLoS Pathog. 2007;3:e184. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kim AS, Garni RM, Henry-Stanley MJ, Bendel CM, Erlandsen SL, Wells CL. Hypoxia and extraintestinal dissemination of Candida albicans yeast forms. Shock. 2003;19:257–262. doi: 10.1097/00024382-200303000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Montagnoli C, Bacci A, Bozza S, Gaziano R, Mosci P, Sharpe AH, Romani L. B7/CD28-dependent CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells are essential components of the memory-protective immunity to Candida albicans. J Immunol. 2002;169:6298–6308. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.11.6298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • **25.Standaert-Vitse A, Sendid B, Joossens M, Francois N, Vandewalle-El Khoury P, Branche J, Van Kruiningen H, Jouault T, Rutgeerts P, Gower-Rousseau C, et al. Candida albicans colonization and ASCA in familial Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:1745–1753. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.225. High level colonization with Candida albicans is associated with familial Crohn’s disease. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Esters N, Pierik M, van Steen K, Vermeire S, Claessens G, Joossens S, Vlietinck R, Rutgeerts P. Transmission of CARD15 (NOD2) variants within families of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:299–305. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.04040.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mei L, Targan SR, Landers CJ, Dutridge D, Ippoliti A, Vasiliauskas EA, Papadakis KA, Fleshner PR, Rotter JI, Yang H. Familial expression of anti-Escherichia coli outer membrane porin C in relatives of patients with Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1078–1085. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sendid B, Quinton JF, Charrier G, Goulet O, Cortot A, Grandbastien B, Poulain D, Colombel JF. Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae mannan antibodies in familial Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;93:1306–1310. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1998.00415.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sutton CL, Yang H, Li Z, Rotter JI, Targan SR, Braun J. Familial expression of anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae mannan antibodies in affected and unaffected relatives of patients with Crohn’s disease. Gut. 2000;46:58–63. doi: 10.1136/gut.46.1.58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.May GR, Sutherland LR, Meddings JB. Is small intestinal permeability really increased in relatives of patients with Crohn’s disease? Gastroenterology. 1993;104:1627–1632. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(93)90638-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Peeters M, Geypens B, Claus D, Nevens H, Ghoos Y, Verbeke G, Baert F, Vermeire S, Vlietinck R, Rutgeerts P. Clustering of increased small intestinal permeability in families with Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 1997;113:802–807. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(97)70174-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kraus TA, Cheifetz A, Toy L, Meddings JB, Mayer L. Evidence for a genetic defect in oral tolerance induction in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2006;12:82–88. doi: 10.1097/01.MIB.0000200343.61707.52. discussion 81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ksiadzyna D, Semianow-Wejchert J, Nawrot U, Wlodarczyk K, Paradowski L. Serum concentration of interleukin 10, anti-mannan Candida antibodies and the fungal colonization of the gastrointestinal tract in patients with ulcerative colitis. Adv Med Sci. 2009;54:170–176. doi: 10.2478/v10039-009-0023-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zwolinska-Wcislo M, Brzozowski T, Budak A, Kwiecien S, Sliwowski Z, Drozdowicz D, Trojanowska D, Rudnicka-Sosin L, Mach T, Konturek SJ, et al. Effect of Candida colonization on human ulcerative colitis and the healing of inflammatory changes of the colon in the experimental model of colitis ulcerosa. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2009;60:107–118. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Morishita T, Kamiya T, Munakata Y, Tsuchiya M. Radiologic and endoscopic studies of gastric ulcers associated with Candida infection. Acta Gastroent Latinoamer. 1993;23:223–229. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Goenka MK, Kochhar R, Chakrabarti A, Kumar A, Gupta O, Talwar P, Mehta SK. Candida overgrowth after treatment of duodenal ulcer. A comparison of cimetidine, famotidine, and omeprazole. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1996;23:7–10. doi: 10.1097/00004836-199607000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zwolinska-Wcislo M, Brzozowski T, Mach T, Budak A, Trojanowska D, Konturek PC, Pajdo R, Drozdowicz D, Kwiecien S. Are probiotics effective in the treatment of fungal colonization of the gastrointestinal tract? Experimental and clinical studies. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2006;57 (Suppl 9):35–49. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Nakamura T, Yoshida M, Ishikawa H, Kameyama K, Wakabayashi G, Otani Y, Shimazu M, Tanabe M, Kawachi S, Kumai K, et al. Candida albicans aggravates duodenal ulcer perforation induced by administration of cysteamine in rats. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;22:749–756. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2006.04353.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Jin L, Yoshida M, Nakamura T, Ishikawa H, Wakabayashi G, Tanabe M, Kawachi S, Shinoda M, Saikawa Y, Wada N, et al. Candida albicans infection delays duodenal ulcer healing in cysteamine-induced duodenal ulcers in rats. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53:2878–2885. doi: 10.1007/s10620-008-0385-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Brzozowski T, Zwolinska-Wcislo M, Konturek PC, Kwiecien S, Drozdowicz D, Konturek SJ, Stachura J, Budak A, Bogdal J, Pawlik WW, et al. Influence of gastric colonization with Candida albicans on ulcer healing in rats: effect of ranitidine, aspirin and probiotic therapy. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2005;40:286–296. doi: 10.1080/00365520510011524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • **41.Jawhara S, Thuru X, Standaert-Vitse A, Jouault T, Mordon S, Sendid B, Desreumaux P, Poulain D. Colonization of mice by Candida albicans is promoted by chemically induced colitis and augments inflammatory responses through galectin-3. J Infect Dis. 2008;197:972–980. doi: 10.1086/528990. Chemical treatment that induces colitis permits murine intestinal colonization by Candida albicans in the absence of antibiotic treatment. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • **42.Stecher B, Robbiani R, Walker AW, Westendorf AM, Barthel M, Kremer M, Chaffron S, Macpherson AJ, Buer J, Parkhill J, et al. Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium exploits inflammation to compete with the intestinal microbiota. PLoS Biol. 2007;5:2177–2189. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050244. Inflammation evoked by Salmonella enhances the ability of the organism to colonize the murine intestine. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Rutgeerts P, Goboes K, Peeters M, Hiele M, Penninckx F, Aerts R, Kerremans R, Vantrappen G. Effect of faecal stream diversion on recurrence of Crohn’s disease in the neoterminal ileum. Lancet. 1991;338:771–774. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90663-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Stepankova R, Powrie F, Kofronova O, Kozakova H, Hudcovic T, Hrncir T, Uhlig H, Read S, Rehakova Z, Benada O, et al. Segmented filamentous bacteria in a defined bacterial cocktail induce intestinal inflammation in SCID mice reconstituted with CD45RBhigh CD4+ T cells. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2007;13:1202–1211. doi: 10.1002/ibd.20221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Sands BE. Inflammatory bowel disease: past, present, and future. J Gastroenterol. 2007;42:16–25. doi: 10.1007/s00535-006-1995-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Card T, Logan RF, Rodrigues LC, Wheeler JG. Antibiotic use and the development of Crohn’s disease. Gut. 2004;53:246–250. doi: 10.1136/gut.2003.025239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hovhannisyan Z, Treatman J, Littman DR, Mayer L. Characterization of interleukin-17-producing regulatory T cells in inflamed intestinal mucosa from patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology. 2010;140:957–965. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Shen W, Durum SK. Synergy of IL-23 and Th17 cytokines: new light on inflammatory bowel disease. Neurochem Res. 2010;35:940–946. doi: 10.1007/s11064-009-0091-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sarra M, Pallone F, Macdonald TT, Monteleone G. IL-23/IL-17 axis in IBD. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2010;16:1808–1813. doi: 10.1002/ibd.21248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zhang Z, Rosenbaum JT, Zhong W, Lim C, Hinrichs DJ. Costimulation of Th17 cells: Adding fuel or putting out the fire in the inflamed gut? Semin Immunopathol. 2010;32:55–70. doi: 10.1007/s00281-009-0190-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Liu ZJ, Yadav PK, Su JL, Wang JS, Fei K. Potential role of Th17 cells in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:5784–5788. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.5784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Veny M, Esteller M, Ricart E, Pique JM, Panes J, Salas A. Late Crohn’s disease patients present an increase in peripheral Th17 cells and cytokine production compared with early patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;31:561–572. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04209.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Rovedatti L, Kudo T, Biancheri P, Sarra M, Knowles CH, Rampton DS, Corazza GR, Monteleone G, Di Sabatino A, Macdonald TT. Differential regulation of interleukin 17 and interferon gamma production in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 2009;58:1629–1636. doi: 10.1136/gut.2009.182170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Seiderer J, Elben I, Diegelmann J, Glas J, Stallhofer J, Tillack C, Pfennig S, Jurgens M, Schmechel S, Konrad A, et al. Role of the novel Th17 cytokine IL-17F in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): upregulated colonic IL-17F expression in active Crohn’s disease and analysis of the IL17F p. His161Arg polymorphism in IBD. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008;14:437–445. doi: 10.1002/ibd.20339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Fujino S, Andoh A, Bamba S, Ogawa A, Hata K, Araki Y, Bamba T, Fujiyama Y. Increased expression of interleukin 17 in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 2003;52:65–70. doi: 10.1136/gut.52.1.65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Mizuno T, Ando T, Nobata K, Tsuzuki T, Maeda O, Watanabe O, Minami M, Ina K, Kusugami K, Peek RM, et al. Interleukin-17 levels in Helicobacter pylori-infected gastric mucosa and pathologic sequelae of colonization. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11:6305–6311. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i40.6305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hue S, Ahern P, Buonocore S, Kullberg MC, Cua DJ, McKenzie BS, Powrie F, Maloy KJ. Interleukin-23 drives innate and T cell-mediated intestinal inflammation. J Exp Med. 2006;203:2473–2483. doi: 10.1084/jem.20061099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kullberg MC, Jankovic D, Feng CG, Hue S, Gorelick PL, McKenzie BS, Cua DJ, Powrie F, Cheever AW, Maloy KJ, et al. IL-23 plays a key role in Helicobacter hepaticus-induced T cell-dependent colitis. J Exp Med. 2006;203:2485–2494. doi: 10.1084/jem.20061082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Yen D, Cheung J, Scheerens H, Poulet F, McClanahan T, McKenzie B, Kleinschek MA, Owyang A, Mattson J, Blumenschein W, et al. IL-23 is essential for T cell-mediated colitis and promotes inflammation via IL-17 and IL-6. J Clin Invest. 2006;116:1310–1316. doi: 10.1172/JCI21404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Conti HR, Shen F, Nayyar N, Stocum E, Sun JN, Lindemann MJ, Ho AW, Hai JH, Yu JJ, Jung JW, et al. Th17 cells and IL-17 receptor signaling are essential for mucosal host defense against oral candidiasis. J Exp Med. 2009;206:299–311. doi: 10.1084/jem.20081463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Saunus JM, Wagner SA, Matias MA, Hu Y, Zaini ZM, Farah CS. Early activation of the interleukin-23-17 axis in a murine model of oropharyngeal candidiasis. Mol Oral Microbiol. 2010;25:343–356. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-1014.2010.00570.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Nakamura T, Yoshida M, Otani Y, Kameyama K, Ishikawa H, Kumai K, Kubota T, Saikawa Y, Kitajima M. Twelve years’ progress in surgery for perforated gastric and duodenal ulcers: a retrospective study of indications for laparoscopic surgery, post-operative course and the influence of Candida infection. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;24 (Suppl 4):297–302. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Lee SC, Fung CP, Chen HY, Li CT, Jwo SC, Hung YB, See LC, Liao HC, Loke SS, Wang FL, et al. Candida peritonitis due to peptic ulcer perforation: incidence rate, risk factors, prognosis and susceptibility to fluconazole and amphotericin B. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2002;44:23–27. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(02)00419-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

ACTIONS

RESOURCES

[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2026 Movatter.jp