Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main content
                                  NCBI home page
Search in PMCSearch
As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more:PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logo

Floral isolation between Aquilegia formosa and Aquilegia pubescens

M Fulton,S A Hodges
PMCID: PMC1690454

Abstract

The acquisition of floral nectar spurs is correlated with increased species diversity across multiple clades. We tested whether variation in nectar spurs influences reproductive isolation and, thus, can potentially promote species diversity using two species ofAquilegia,Aquilegia formosa andAquilegia pubescens, which form narrow hybrid zones. Floral visitors strongly discriminated between the two species both in natural populations and at mixed-species arrays of individual flowers. Bees and hummingbirds visited flowers ofA. formosa at a much greater rate than flowers ofA. pubescens. Hawkmoths, however, nearly exclusively visited flowers ofA. pubescens. We found that altering the orientation ofA. pubescens flowers from upright to pendent, like the flowers ofA. formosa, reduced hawkmoth visitation by an order of magnitude. In contrast, shortening the length of the nectar spurs ofA. pubescens flowers to a length similar toA. formosa flowers did not affect hawkmoth visitation. However, pollen removal was significantly reduced in flowers with shortened nectar spurs. These data indicate that floral traits promote floral isolation between these species and that specific floral traits affect floral isolation via ethological isolation while others affect floral isolation via mechanical isolation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as aPDF (127.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Coyne J. A., Orr H. A. The evolutionary genetics of speciation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1998 Feb 28;353(1366):287–305. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Grant V. Floral isolation between ornithophilous and sphingophilous species of Ipomopsis and Aquilegia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Dec 15;89(24):11828–11831. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.24.11828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hodges S. A., Arnold M. L. Columbines: a geographically widespread species flock. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 May 24;91(11):5129–5132. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.11.5129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hodges S. A., Arnold M. L. Floral and ecological isolation between Aquilegia formosa and Aquilegia pubescens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Mar 29;91(7):2493–2496. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.7.2493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Karl S. A., Avise J. C. Balancing selection at allozyme loci in oysters: implications from nuclear RFLPs. Science. 1992 Apr 3;256(5053):100–102. doi: 10.1126/science.1348870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sanderson M. J., Donoghue M. J. Shifts in diversification rate with the origin of angiosperms. Science. 1994 Jun 10;264(5165):1590–1593. doi: 10.1126/science.264.5165.1590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wollenberg K., Arnold J., Avise J. C. Recognizing the forest for the trees: testing temporal patterns of cladogenesis using a null model of stochastic diversification. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Jul;13(6):833–849. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy ofThe Royal Society

ACTIONS

RESOURCES


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp