Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main content
                                  NCBI home page
Search in PMCSearch
As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more:PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice
American Journal of Public Health logo

Why genes don't count (for racial differences in health).

A H Goodman1
1US Southwest and Mexico Program, School of Natural Science, Hampshire College, Amherst, MA 01002, USA. agoodman@hampshire.edu
PMCID: PMC1446406  PMID:11076233

Abstract

There is a paradoxical relationship between "race" and genetics. Whereas genetic data were first used to prove the validity of race, since the early 1970s they have been used to illustrate the invalidity of biological races. Indeed, race does not account for human genetic variation, which is continuous, complexly structured, constantly changing, and predominantly within "races." Despite the disproof of race-as-biology, genetic variation continues to be used to explain racial differences. Such explanations require the acceptance of 2 disproved assumptions: that genetic variation explains variation in disease and that genetic variation explains racial variation in disease. While the former is a form of geneticization, the notion that genes are the primary determinants of biology and behavior, the latter represents a form of racialization, an exaggeration of the salience of race. Using race as a proxy for genetic differences limits understandings of the complex interactions among political-economic processes, lived experiences, and human biologies. By moving beyond studies of racialized genetics, we can clarify the processes by which varied and interwoven forms of racialization and racism affect individuals "under the skin."

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as aPDF (72.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Hahn R. A., Mulinare J., Teutsch S. M. Inconsistencies in coding of race and ethnicity between birth and death in US infants. A new look at infant mortality, 1983 through 1985. JAMA. 1992 Jan 8;267(2):259–263. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Knowler W. C., Williams R. C., Pettitt D. J., Steinberg A. G. Gm3;5,13,14 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: an association in American Indians with genetic admixture. Am J Hum Genet. 1988 Oct;43(4):520–526. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Sauer N. J. Forensic anthropology and the concept of race: if races don't exist, why are forensic anthropologists so good at identifying them? Soc Sci Med. 1992 Jan;34(2):107–111. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90086-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy ofAmerican Public Health Association

ACTIONS

RESOURCES


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp