Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main content
                                  NCBI home page
Search in PMCSearch
As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more:PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice
Science Progress logo

DIY Biology – Hacking Goes Viral!

Roy D Sleator1,
1Cork Institute of Technology's Department of Biological Sciences.

E-mailroy.sleator@cit.ie

A Principal Investigator at CIT's BioExplore Research Centre and University College Cork's APC Microbiome Institute, Sleator is also founding Editor-in-Chief of the scientific journalBioengineered. Follow @RoySleator on Twitter.

Issue date 2016 Sep.

© 2016 SAGE Publications
PMCID: PMC10365417  PMID:28742489

Abstract

The Do-It-Yourself Biology (DIYBio) movement has gained significant traction in recent years; morphing from counter culture to an essential component of biology's future development.

Keywords: synthetic biology, molecular biology

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as aPDF (466.3 KB).

References

  • 1.Sleator R.D. (2014) The synthetic biology future. Bioengineered, 5, 69–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bennett G., Gilman N., Stavrianakis A., and Rabinow P. (2009) From synthetic biology to biohacking: are we prepared? Nat. biotech., 27, 1109–1011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hochachka W.M., Fink D., Hutchinson R.A., Sheldon D., Wong W.K., and Kelling S. (2012) Data-intensive science applied to broad-scale citizen science. Trends Ecol. Evol., 27, 130–137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Landrain T., Meyer M., Perez A.M., and Sussan R. (2013) Do-it-yourself biology: challenges and promises for an open science and technology movement. Syst. Synth. Biol., 7, 115–126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.DIYBio (2016) An institution for the Do-It-Yourself Biologist.http://diybio.org/ [accessed 5 July 2016].
  • 6.Balmer A.S., and Bulpin K.J. (2013) Left to their own devices: Post-ELSI, ethical equipment and the International Genetically Engineered Machine (iGEM) competition. BioSocieties, 8, 311–335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Evans N.G., and Selgelid M.J. (2015) Biosecurity and open-source biology: The promise and peril of distributed synthetic biological technologies. Sci. Eng. Ethics, 21, 1065–1083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Garvey C. (2016) DremelFuge–a one-piece centrifuge for rotary tools.http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:1483 [accessed 5 July 2016].
  • 9.Anon. (2009) Hacking goes squishy. The Economist Technology Quarterly.http://www.economist.com/node/14299634 [accessed 5 July 2016].

Articles from Science Progress are provided here courtesy ofSAGE Publications

ACTIONS

RESOURCES


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp