GeneReviews^® [Internet].

Clinical characteristics.

C3 glomerulopathy (C3G) is a complex ultra-rare complement-mediated renal disease caused by uncontrolled activation of the complement alternative pathway (AP) in the fluid phase (as opposed to cell surface) that is rarely inherited in a simple mendelian fashion. C3G affects individuals of all ages, with a median age at diagnosis of 23 years. Individuals with C3G typically present with hematuria, proteinuria, hematuria and proteinuria, acute nephritic syndrome or nephrotic syndrome, and low levels of the complement component C3. Spontaneous remission of C3G is uncommon, and about half of affected individuals develop end-stage renal disease (ESRD) within ten years of diagnosis, occasionally developing the late comorbidity of impaired visual acuity.

Diagnosis/testing.

The definitive diagnosis of C3G requires a renal biopsy with specialized immunofluorescence and electron microscopy studies both for diagnosis and to distinguish between the two major subtypes of C3G: C3 glomerulonephritis (C3GN) and dense deposit disease (DDD). Some individuals will havebiallelic orheterozygous pathogenic variants identified bymolecular genetic testing in one or more of the genes that have been implicated in the pathogenesis of C3G (i.e.,C3,CD46,CFB,CFH,CFHR1,CFHR5,CFI, andDGKE).

Management.

Treatment of manifestations: Nonspecific therapies used to treat numerous chronic glomerular diseases, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II type-1 receptor blockers, and lipid-lowering agents (in particular hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors). Complement inhibition with a terminal pathway blocker may alter disease course in some individuals. When ESRD develops, treatment options are limited to dialysis or transplantation. C3G recurs in nearly all grafts and is the predominant cause of graft failure in 50%-90% of transplant recipients.

Prevention of primary manifestations: Plasma replacement therapy in individuals with pathogenic variants inCFH may be effective in controlling complement activation and slowing progression of ESRD.

Surveillance: Close monitoring of renal function by a nephrologist with familiarity with the C3G disease spectrum, complete biannual assessment of the complement pathway, periodic eye examinations to evaluate the fundus.

Evaluation of relatives at risk: If the family history is positive for renal disease, evaluation of apparently asymptomatic at-risk relatives can includemolecular genetic testing (if the pathogenic variants in the family are known), urinalysis, and comprehensive analysis of the complement system.

Genetic counseling.

C3G is a complex genetic disorder that is rarely inherited in a simple mendelian fashion. Multiple affected persons within a single nuclear family are reported only occasionally, with both dominant and recessive inheritance being described.

Suggestive Findings

C3Gshould be suspected in individuals of all ages who present with one of the following:

• Hematuria
• Proteinuria
• Hematuria and proteinuria
• Acute nephritic syndrome
• Nephrotic syndrome
• Persistent hypocomplementemia (low serum levels of complement component C3)

Establishing the Diagnosis

The diagnosis of C3Gis established in aproband with typical findings onrenal biopsy. Some individuals will havebiallelic orheterozygous pathogenic variants identified bymolecular genetic testing in one or more of the genes listed inTable 1.

Note: Identification of apathogenic variant may help to direct treatment of the individual.

Renal biopsy. The definitive diagnosis of C3G requires a renal biopsy with specialized studies (seeFigure 1) both for diagnosis and to distinguish between C3 glomerulonephritis (C3GN) and dense deposit disease (DDD).

Figure 1.

Disease-specific characteristic IF, EM, and LM biopsy images in C3 glomerulopathy (C3G) A. Immunofluoresence (IF) shows bright staining for C3, which must be at least two orders of magnitude greater than any other immune reactant. Note the diffuse glomerular(more...)

• Immunofluorescence (IF). The diagnosis of C3G can only be made with IF studies of a renal biopsy.
  • The predominant staining of C3 is key in delivering a C3G diagnosis.
  • IF should be predominantly positive for C3 with C3 intensity at least two orders of magnitude greater than any other immune reactant (i.e., IgA, IgG, IgM, and C1q) (Figure 1A).
• Electron microscopy (EM) is used to distinguish between C3GN and DDD, a clinically relevant distinction (Figure 1). EM should demonstrate dense transformation of the glomerulus.
  • In C3GN there are light, hump-like and clustered deposits, which are found in the mesangium or in the subendothelial and/or subepithelial spaces.
  • In DDD, the deposits are darker, denser, segmental, discontinuous, ribbon-like, or diffuse and are most frequently located in the lamina densa of the glomerular basement membrane (GBM) (Figure 1B-C).
• Light microscopy (LM) is necessary to quantitate changes associated with chronic kidney disease and risk for progression of ESRD.
  LM most commonly demonstrates mild mesangial cell hypercellularity (45% of cases), although membranoproliferative (25%), crescentic (18%), and acute proliferative and exudative (12%) patterns are also seen (Figure 1D).

Note: Timing of the biopsy is important. If the presentation suggests post-infectious glomerulonephritis (PIGN; seeFigure 2), waiting for three months is typically recommended. During that interval, the hypocomplementemia, hematuria, and proteinuria that are characteristic of both PIGN and C3G should resolve in cases of PIGN [Walker et al 2007,Nester & Smith 2016,Goodship et al 2017].

Figure 2.

Schematic representation of disease types Post-infectious glomerulonephritis (PIGN), C3 glomerulopathy (C3G), and other disease types fall under the classification "glomerular diseases with dominant C3" immunofluorescence (IF) staining, with the term(more...)

Molecular genetic testing approaches can include amultigene panel,more comprehensivegenomic testing, andserial single-gene testing:

• Amultigene panel that includesC3,CD46,CFB,CFH,CFHR1,CFHR5,CFI,DGKE, and other genes of interest (seeDifferential Diagnosis) may be considered. Note: (1) The genes included in the panel and the diagnosticsensitivity of the testing used for eachgene vary by laboratory and are likely to change over time. (2) Some multigene panels may include genes not associated with the condition discussed in thisGeneReview; thus, clinicians need to determine which multigene panel is most likely to identify the genetic cause of the condition while limiting identification of variants ofuncertain significance and pathogenic variants in genes that do not explain the underlyingphenotype. (3) In some laboratories, panel options may include a custom laboratory-designed panel and/or custom phenotype-focusedexome analysis that includes genes specified by the clinician. (4) Methods used in a panel may includesequence analysis,deletion/duplication analysis, and/or other non-sequencing-based tests.
  For an introduction to multigene panels clickhere. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genetic tests can be foundhere.
  Note: Analysis ofCFH-related genes is complicated by the high degree of sequence identity betweenCFH and the downstreamCFH-related genes (CFHR1-CFHR5). This similarity results in susceptibility tononallelic homologous recombination (NAHR) events, large-scale deletions or duplications (copy number variants), and generation of hybridCFH genes. Molecular assays must be specifically designed to detect the spectrum of changes that can occur in this region.
• More comprehensivegenomic testing (when available) includingexome sequencing andgenome sequencing may be considered. Such testing may provide or suggest a diagnosis not previously considered (e.g., mutation of a differentgene or genes that results in a similar clinical presentation).
  For an introduction to comprehensivegenomic testing clickhere. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genomic testing can be foundhere.
• Serial single-gene testing. Sequence analysis can be performed on a gene-by-gene basis, although this approach is generally not recommended because there are no phenotypic clues to inform the order of genes to be tested and because rare/novel variants can be present in multiple genes [Bu et al 2016]. If single-gene testing is performed, gene-targeteddeletion/duplication testing over theCFHR1-CFHR5 region should also be completed in all cases.

SeeFigure 3.

Figure 3.

Complement factor H-related hybrid proteins and C3G Adapted from Togarsimalemath et al [2017] and references therein

Clinical Description

Age of onset. C3 glomerulopathy (C3G) affects individuals of all ages.Lu et al [2012] report a 1:1 female:male distribution and a median age at diagnosis of 23 years.

In comparing the two major subtypes, the median age at time of diagnosis in C3 glomerulonephritis (C3GN) is higher than in dense deposit disease (DDD). In childhood, DDD is more frequently diagnosed than C3GN [Nester & Smith 2016,Riedl et al 2017].

Renal disease. Individuals with C3G typically present with one of the following findings:

• Hematuria
• Proteinuria
• Hematuria and proteinuria
• Acute nephritic syndrome
• Nephrotic syndrome

Hypocomplementemia. Individuals with C3G have low levels of complement component C3. Complement dysregulation can be mediated by autoantibodies (seePathophysiology).

Autoantibodies that may be detected in individuals with C3G:

• Serum C3 nephritic factor (C3NeFs). C3NeFs are present in up to ~50% of individuals with C3GN and ~80% of individuals with DDD [Salvadori & Bertoni 2016].
• Factor H autoantibodies (FHAAs).Blanc et al [2015] reported the prevalence of FHAAs in C3G individuals to be 11%.
• Factor B autoantibodies (FBAAs). FBAAs have been linked to C3G; their role in disease remains unclear [Pickering et al 2013].

Course and progression

• Spontaneous remission of C3G is uncommon [Habib et al 1975,Cameron et al 1983,Marks & Rees 2000,Thomas et al 2014]. While the disease can remain stable for years despite persistent proteinuria, in some individuals rapid fluctuations in proteinuria occur, with episodes of acute renal deterioration in the absence of obvious triggering events. Efforts to move individuals to remission have not been successful [Daina et al 2012,McCaughan et al 2012]. Current data suggest that C3G remains a chronic disease subject to acute exacerbations, with constant activation of the complement alternative pathway (AP) [Goodship et al 2017].
• About half of affected individuals develop end-stage renal disease (ESRD) within ten years of diagnosis [Lu et al 2007,Servais et al 2012,Nester & Smith 2016,Goodship et al 2017], occasionally developing the late comorbidity of impaired visual acuity [Recalde et al 2016].
  • Progression to ESRD can be rapid [Smith et al 2007,Nester & Smith 2013b,Servais et al 2013].
  • Age and sex of an individual are not significant predictors of disease course.
  • Native kidney survival is comparable in C3GN and DDD [Servais et al 2013,Nester & Smith 2016].

Acquired partial lipodystrophy (APL). APL may develop as a direct aftermath of complement activation in 5%-17% of persons with C3G [Barbour et al 2013b,Goodship et al 2017]. The association between APL and C3G is related to the effects of AP dysregulation on both kidneys and adipose tissue [Goodship et al 2017]. The deposition of activated complement components in adipose tissue destroys adipocytes in areas where factor D (fD, also known as adipsin) is high; loss of subcutaneous fat in the upper half of the body typically precedes the onset of kidney disease by several years.

Eye findings. Individuals with C3G develop drusen as a result of complement activation, often in early adulthood [Barbour et al 2013b,Thomas et al 2014,Goodship et al 2017]. The whitish-yellow deposits, which lie within Bruch's membrane beneath the retinal pigment epithelium of the retina, are similar in composition and structure to the deposits observed in the kidney [D'Souza et al 2009,Lu et al 2012,Barbour et al 2013b]. The retinal distribution of drusen is variable [Thomas et al 2014,Goodship et al 2017] and initially has little impact on visual acuity or visual fields. However, vision loss can occur later in life [Cebeci et al 2016].

Recent investigations convey the importance of the complications that result from drusen [Cebeci et al 2016,Dalvin et al 2016,Savige et al 2016]. Tests of retinal function such as dark adaptation, electroretinography, and electrooculography can gradually become abnormal, and vision can deteriorate as subretinal neovascular membranes, macular detachment, and central serous retinopathy develop [Cebeci et al 2016,Dalvin et al 2016,Savige et al 2016].

The long-term risk for visual problems in individuals with C3G is approximately 10%. No correlation exists between disease severity in the kidney and in the eye.

Pathophysiology

SeeFigure 4. Fluid-phase dysregulation of the alternate pathway (AP) of the complement cascade is the triggering pathophysiologic event in C3G, and dysregulation of the C3 convertase alone is necessary and sufficient to result in C3G [Martínez-Barricarte et al 2010,Paixão-Cavalcante et al 2012,Zhang et al 2012].

Figure 4.

Complement alternative pathway (AP) Left. Three phases of complement activity are illustrated:

During disease progression, activation of downstream complement proteins in the solid phase, in particular cleavage of C5 to C5a and C5b, can contribute to tissue injury in the micro-environment of the renal glomerulus [Appel et al 2005,Smith et al 2007]. Current consensus considers that in C3G, uncontrolled regulation of the AP may be due to both genetic and/or acquired drivers of disease [Servais et al 2012,Nester & Smith 2016,Goodship et al 2017].

Acquired drivers of disease include autoantibodies such as C3 nephritic factors (C3NeFs), C4 nephritic factors (C4NeFs), C5 nephritic factors (C5NeFs), factor H autoantibodies (FHAA), and factor B autoantibodies (FBAA).

C3NeFs and C5NeFs are most commonly detected and are autoantibodies that recognize neoantigenic epitopes on C3bBb, the C3 convertase of the AP, and on C3bBbC3b, the C5 convertase of the terminal pathway, respectively (seeFigure 4) [Paixão-Cavalcante et al 2012,Zhang et al 2012,Nester & Smith 2013a,Nicolas et al 2014]. C3 convertases cleave C3 into C3b and C3a, while C5 convertases cleave C5 into C5a and C5b. In the presence of C3NeFs and C5NeFs, the half-lives of C3 convertase and C5 convertase are increased. Persistent cleavage of C3 drives down serum concentrations of C3 and increases serum concentrations of its cleavage products, C3c and C3d, while persistent cleavage of C5 increases serum concentrations of soluble C5b-9. C4NeFs are found in fewer than 5% of individuals with C3GN and stabilize the C3 convertase of the classic and lectin pathways (C4b2a) [Zhang et al 2017].

Nephritic factors may persist in serum throughout the disease course [Schwertz et al 2001,Paixão-Cavalcante et al 2012,Zhang et al 2012]. Serum concentrations of C3NeFs can vary over time [Appel et al 2005,Paixão-Cavalcante et al 2012,Zhang et al 2012,Servais et al 2013,Rabasco et al 2015]. Their presence is nearly always associated with evidence of complement activation such as decrease in serum concentration of C3 and increase in serum concentration of C3 cleavage products (e.g., C3c and C3d), but the relationship between nephritic factors, C3, and prognosis is not clear [Paixão-Cavalcante et al 2012,Zhang et al 2012,Rabasco et al 2015]. The observed differences may be reconciled by several observations relevant to C3NeFs, which have been most thoroughly studied. First, not all C3NeFs recognize the same epitope on C3bBb; second, the methods for their detection vary; third, many studies do not report titers; and fourth, there is good evidence that the triggering epitopes can change over time [Ohi et al 1992,Spitzer & Stitzel 1996,Paixão-Cavalcante et al 2012,Zhang et al 2012].

The consequence of AP dysregulation in C3G is kidney damage. As the degree of chronic damage increases, renal outcome ultimately becomes independent of the degree of complement dysregulation. With sufficient chronic damage, even if complement normalcy is restored, the likelihood of improving or stabilizing renal function becomes remote and ESRD ensues.

Factor H autoantibodies (FHAA) have been reported in individuals with C3G; epitope mapping shows that these autoantibodies bind the N-terminus of fH [Zhang et al 2012,Blanc et al 2015,Goodship et al 2017].

Factor B autoantibodies (FBAA) have been linked to C3G; however, their role in disease remains unclear [Pickering et al 2013]. FBAAs were identified in a person with DDD without serum C3NeFs. FBAAs bind to and stabilize C3 convertase, targeting both fB and C3b, enhancing the consumption of C3. C5 convertase formation from C3 convertase is prevented, thus interfering with activation of the terminal complement cascade [Strobel et al 2010]. Additional studies have identified FBAAs targeting fB and C3b in two individuals with DDD; C3 convertase activity was increased although no C3NeFs were identified [Chen et al 2011].

As a general rule, C3Nefs, FHAAs, and FBAAs extend the half-life and stabilize C3 convertase, which leads to persistent AP activation in the fluid phase [Noris & Remuzzi 2015].

Genotype-Phenotype Correlations

To date, the most strikinggenotype-phenotype correlation has been withCFHR fusion genes and the C3GN phenotype (as opposed to the DDD phenotype) (seeFigure 3).

Nomenclature

C3 glomerulonephritis (C3GN) and dense deposit disease (DDD). Prior to adopting the C3G classification [Pickering et al 2013], dense deposit disease (DDD) was also described as membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type 2 (MPGN2). C3 glomerulonephritis (C3GN) was recognized as atypical MPGN1 (Burkholder variant of MPGN1) and atypical MPGN3 (Strife and Anders variant of MPGN3) [D'Agati & Bomback 2012,Sethi et al 2016].

Prevalence

The rarity of C3G makes it difficult to estimate prevalence, although from epidemiologic studies, its prevalence in the USA is estimated at 2-3 per 1,000,000 [Smith et al 2007].

Table 2.

View in own window

Table 3.

View in own window

Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis

To establish the extent of disease and needs in an individual diagnosed with C3G, the following evaluations are recommended if they have not already been completed:

• Evaluate the complement system by measuring serum/plasma concentrations of C3, C3c, C3d, C4, C5, fB, Ba, Bb, fH, fI, properdin, and s(C5b-9).
• Quantitate the degree of complement function by measuring CH50 and APH50.
• Measure autoantibodies including C3NeFs, C4NeFs, C5NeFs, FHAA, and FBAA.
• Establish the extent of renal disease by measuring serum creatinine concentration, and monitor creatinine clearance, proteinuria, and hematuria.
• Quantitate the degree of chronic renal damage by renal biopsy.
• Obtain a baseline ophthalmologic examination.
• Consult with a clinical geneticist and/or genetic counselor.

Treatment of Manifestations

Currently, there are no therapeutic agents specifically designed to target the underlying complement dysregulation that occurs in individuals with C3G. Nonspecific therapies are most commonly used.

Nonspecific therapies have been shown to be effective in numerous chronic glomerular diseases. The judicious use of these agents along with optimal blood pressure control is of benefit in individuals with C3G.

• Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II type-1 receptor blockers decrease proteinuria in many glomerular diseases and slow the progression to renal failure [Licht et al 2006,Lu et al 2012,Nester & Smith 2016,Riedl et al 2017]. A retrospective study found that the combination of angiotensin blockers and immunosuppressants (steroids) is more effective than each therapy alone in preventing the development of renal failure [Nasr et al 2009,Nester & Smith 2013b,Thomas et al 2014,Cook 2017].
• Lipid-lowering agents, and in particular hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, may delay progression of renal disease as well as correct endothelial cell dysfunction and alter long-term atherosclerotic risks in the presence of hyperlipidemia [Nester & Smith 2013b,Thomas et al 2014]. These agents are not widely used in children.
• Complement inhibition with a terminal pathway blocker may alter disease course. Eculizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that targets C5. It blocks cleavage of C5 by C5 convertase, thereby having two effects: (1) an anti-inflammatory effect caused by preventing the release of C5a, a potent anaphylatoxin; and (2) an anticomplement effect caused by preventing formation of the terminal complement complex (seeFigure 4). Reports of its use in individuals with C3G have demonstrated limited success [ClinicalTrials.govNCT00838513,Bomback et al 2012].
  • Individuals with C3G treated with eculizumab have not produced a uniform response [Noris & Remuzzi 2015].
  • Early administration of eculizumab prior to sclerotic tissue formation provides better results, reduces proteinuria, and improves kidney health [Vivarelli & Emma 2014]; however, success of this therapeutic is limited in C3G because proximal complement control is not restored (seeFigure 4).

Renal allografts. When end-stage renal disease (ESRD) develops, treatment options are limited to dialysis or transplantation. When an individual with C3G elects to undergo a renal transplant, it is important to recognize that C3G recurs in nearly all grafts and is the predominant cause of graft failure in 50%-90% of transplant recipients [Appel et al 2005,Angelo et al 2011,Lu et al 2012,Servais et al 2012,Zand et al 2014,Salvadori & Bertoni 2016,Goodship et al 2017]. Data suggesting that any therapeutic interventions reverse this course are limited, although isolated reports have described the use of plasmapheresis, which appears to be of equivocal benefit [Fremeaux-Bacchi et al 1994,Kurtz & Schlueter 2002]. A thorough complement and genetic evaluation of the transplant recipient is recommended pre-transplantation as results may inform post-transplant care. In addition, a genetic assessment is recommended for relatives being considered as kidney donors.

Prevention of Primary Manifestations

Most treatments for C3G are ineffective; however, plasma replacement therapy in individuals with pathogenic variants inCFH has been reported by some authors to be effective in controlling complement activation and slowing progression of ESRD [Licht et al 2006]. Other authors report that the benefit of plasma exchange is inconsistent in reducing progression to ESRD [Kurtz & Schlueter 2002,McCaughan et al 2012,Servais et al 2013,Thomas et al 2014].

Surveillance

The following are appropriate:

• Close monitoring of renal function by a nephrologist with familiarity with the C3G disease spectrum
  Note: Frequency of follow up and testing required is determined by the degree of renal dysfunction.
• Complete biannual assessment of the complement pathway
• Periodic eye examinations to evaluate the fundus

Evaluation of Relatives at Risk

There are very fewfamilial cases of C3G. However, if the family history is positive for renal disease, it is appropriate to evaluate apparently asymptomatic sibs of aproband and at-risk relatives to identify those who would benefit from periodic observation and continued follow up for management of renal disease.

Evaluations can include:

• Molecular genetic testing if the pathogenic variants in the family are known. Penetrance rates, however, are not known.
• Urinalysis
• Comprehensive analysis of the complement system if the pathogenic variants in the family are not known.

SeeGenetic Counseling for issues related to testing of at-risk relatives forgenetic counseling purposes.

Pregnancy Management

Chronic kidney disease does not preclude pregnancy, but any pregnancy in a woman with C3G should be followed by a nephrologist and obstetrician with expertise in caring for pregnant women with chronic kidney disease [Nava et al 2017,Piccoli et al 2018].

SeeMotherToBaby for further information on medication use during pregnancy.

Therapies Under Investigation

Numerous anti-complement therapies are entering clinical trials for individuals with C3G. These trials are registered underClinicalTrials.gov.

SearchClinicalTrials.gov in the US andEU Clinical Trials Register in Europe for access to information on clinical studies for a wide range of diseases and conditions.

Mode of Inheritance

C3G is a complex genetic disorder that is rarely inherited in a simple mendelian fashion. In most persons with C3G, inheritance is complex and incompletely understood. For these reasons,recurrence risk to family members is not known but likely very low.

• In persons with C3G in whom two pathogenic variants can be identified, inheritance isautosomal recessive.
• Multiple affected persons within a single nuclear family are only reported occasionally; in these instances, parentalconsanguinity is common [Licht et al 2006].
• Autosomal dominant cases of C3G are reported in association with CFHR hybrid fusion proteins (seeFigure 3).

Autosomal Recessive C3G – Risk to Family Members

Parents of aproband

• The parents of an affected child are obligate heterozygotes (i.e., carriers of onepathogenic variant).
• Heterozygotes (carriers) are asymptomatic and not at risk of developing the disorder.

Sibs of aproband

• At conception, each sib of an affected individual has a 25% chance of being affected, a 50% chance of being an asymptomaticcarrier, and a 25% chance of being unaffected and not a carrier.
• Heterozygotes (carriers) are asymptomatic and are not at risk of developing the disorder.

Offspring of aproband. The offspring of an individual withautosomal recessive C3G are obligate heterozygotes (carriers) for apathogenic variant.

Other family members. Each sib of theproband's parents is at a 50% risk of being acarrier of apathogenic variant.

Autosomal Dominant C3G – Risk to Family Members

Parents of aproband

• Few individuals (<1%) diagnosed with C3G have an affected parent.
• Becausesimplex cases (i.e., a single occurrence in a family) have not been evaluated sufficiently to determine if thepathogenic variant occurredde novo, the proportion of C3G caused by ade novo pathogenic variant is unknown.
  • Molecular genetic testing is recommended for the parents of aproband with an apparentde novopathogenic variant.
  • If thepathogenic variant found in theproband cannot be detected in leukocyte DNA of either parent, possible explanations include ade novo pathogenic variant in the proband orgermline mosaicism in a parent. Though theoretically possible, no instances of germline mosaicism have been reported.
• The family history of some individuals diagnosed with C3G may appear to be negative because of failure to recognize the disorder in family members, reducedpenetrance, early death of the parent before the onset of symptoms, or late onset of the disease in the affected parent. Therefore, an apparently negative family history cannot be confirmed unless appropriate clinical evaluation and/ormolecular genetic testing has been performed on the parents of theproband.

Sibs of aproband

• The risk to the sibs of theproband depends on the genetic status of the proband's parents.
• If a parent of theproband is affected, the risk to the sibs of inheriting the genetic variant is 50%. However, there is reducedpenetrance in families [Xiao et al 2014].
• If the parents have been tested for thepathogenic variant identified in theproband and:
  • A parent of theproband has thepathogenic variant, the risk to the sibs of inheriting the variant is 50%.
  • If thepathogenic variant found in theproband cannot be detected in the leukocyte DNA of either parent, the risk to sibs is presumed to be slightly greater than that of the general population (though still <1%) because of the theoretic possibility of parentalgermline mosaicism.
• If the parents have not been tested for thepathogenic variant but are clinically unaffected, the risk to the sibs of aproband is extremely low. The sibs of a proband with clinically unaffected parents are still at increased risk for C3G because of the possibility of reducedpenetrance in a parent or the theoretic possibility of parentalgermline mosaicism.

Offspring of aproband. Each child of an individual withautosomal dominant C3G has a 50% chance of inheriting thepathogenic variant; however,penetrance is extremely variable [Xiao et al 2014].

Other family members. The risk to other family members depends on the status of theproband's parents: if a parent has thepathogenic variant, his or her family members may be at risk.

Other Etiologies – Risk to Family Members

Parents, sibs, and offspring of aproband. The risk to the family members of a proband who does not have identified pathogenic variants or a family history consistent withautosomal recessive or dominant inheritance is low.

Related Genetic Counseling Issues

See Management,Evaluation of Relatives at Risk for information on evaluating at-risk relatives for the purpose of early diagnosis and treatment.

Other autoimmune diseases, in particular diabetes mellitus type 1 andceliac disease, are diagnosed more frequently in families with C3G (16% of families) than would be expected based on estimates in the general population [Smith et al 2007,Lu et al 2012,Barbour et al 2013a,Thomas et al 2014].

Family planning

• The optimal time for determination of genetic risk, clarification ofcarrier status, and discussion of the availability of prenatal/preimplantation genetic testing is before pregnancy.
• It is appropriate to offergenetic counseling (including discussion of potential risks to offspring and reproductive options) to young adults who are affected, are carriers, or are at risk of being carriers.

DNA banking. Because it is likely that testing methodology and our understanding of genes, pathogenic mechanisms, and diseases will improve in the future, consideration should be given to banking DNA from probands in whom a molecular diagnosis has not been confirmed (i.e., the causative pathogenic mechanism is unknown).

Prenatal Testing and Preimplantation Genetic Testing

Once the pathogenic variants have been identified in an affected family member,prenatal testing for a pregnancy at increased risk andpreimplantation genetic testing are possible.

Differences in perspective may exist among medical professionals and within families regarding the use ofprenatal testing. While most centers would consider use of prenatal testing to be a personal decision, discussion of these issues may be helpful.

Table A.

View in own window

Table B.

View in own window

Molecular Pathogenesis

The complement system, composed of the classic pathway and the alternate pathway, is a component of the immune system that enhances the function of antibodies and phagocytes. C3 glomerulopathy (C3G) is caused by uncontrolled activation of the complement alternative pathway.

With the exception ofDGKE, all the genes discussed in association with C3G encode proteins in the complement system. C3 and CFB are integral to complement activation and together form C3bBb, a C3 convertase that amplifies the initial complement response, and C3bBbC3b, a C5 convertase that cleaves C5 into C5a and C5b to trigger the terminal pathway. CD46, CFH, CFHR1, CFHR5, and CFI are complement regulators. The role ofDGKE in complement activation, although minimal, is believed to be essential in normal podocyte function.

Familial cases of C3G are uncommon and when identified are most often highly penetrantheterozygous copy number variants involving theCFHR1-5 genes (seeFigure 3),homozygous variants that lead toCFH deficiency, or heterozygousgain-of-function variants inC3. Common to all of these variants is an impact on the regulation of the AP in the fluid phase [Noris & Remuzzi 2017].

Since C3G is rarely inherited in a simple mendelian fashion, the study of rare variants and haplotypes associated with disease is important.

Several studies have shown that some common variants in complement genes are also associated with C3G and increase the odds ratio of developing disease [Abrera-Abeleda et al 2011,Kobayashi et al 2017]. While the identification of common variants that are C3G "risk alleles"cannot be used to direct clinical care, the identification of rare variants in complement genes does affect patient care, especially in the context of a comprehensive assessment of complement function, which includes plasma levels of complement proteins and their split products, assays for autoantibodies, and tests of overall complement activity. For more detailed information, seeOsborne et al [2018].

C3

Gene structure.C3 comprises 41 exons that encode complement C3, which has a molecular weight of 176 kd. The mature protein forms a beta chain and an alpha chain. For a detailed summary ofgene and protein information, seeTable A.

Benign variants. SeveralC3 variants (some of which are common in the population) are associated with C3G and define an at-risk haplotype [Hageman et al 2005,Smith et al 2007,Fremeaux-Bacchi et al 2008,Abrera-Abeleda et al 2011,Iatropoulos et al 2016,Riedl et al 2017,Osborne et al 2018].

Pathogenic variants. Pathogenic variants and their location are shown inTable 4.

Table 4.

C3 Pathogenic Variants Discussed in ThisGeneReview

View in own window

DNA Nucleotide Change	Predicted Protein Change	Affected Domain	Reference Sequences
c.443G>A	p.Arg148Gln	C3β chain	NM_000064​.3 NP_000055​.2
c.1855G>A	p.Val619Met	Linker
c.3125G>A	p.Arg1042Gln	TED
c.3908G>A	p.Arg1303His	CUBf
c.3959G>A	p.Arg1320Gln	CUBf
c.4552T>C	p.Cys1518Arg	C345C
c.4873T>C	p.Asp1625His	C345C

Variants listed in the table have been provided by the authors.GeneReviews staff have not independently verified the classification of variants.

GeneReviews follows the standard naming conventions of the Human Genome Variation Society (varnomen​.hgvs.org). SeeQuick Reference for an explanation of nomenclature.

Normalgene product.C3 encodes complement component C3, the central activating protein of the AP. This 1,663-amino-acid protein has 15 domains, including the anaphylatoxin (ANA), αNT, CUB (C1r/C1s, Uegf, Bmp1), C345C, thioester (TED), linker (LNK), and anchor domains and eight macroglobulin (MG) domains (seeFigure 5). C3 is mainly synthesized in the liver, and it is the central protein of the complement system. Spontaneous or proteolytic cleavage of C3 generates the anaphylatoxin C3a (inflammatory effector cells) and the C3b fragment that deposits on cell surfaces triggering the complement cascade activation.

Figure 5.

Schematic representation of complement component C3 The structural organization of C3 contains eight macroglobulins, anaphylatoxin (ANA), αNT, CUB (C1r/C1s, Uegf, Bmp1), C345C, linker, and thioester (TED) domains.

Abnormalgene product. Most pathogenic variants listed inTable 4 affect proper cleavage of C3 protein by affecting recognition sites for the binding of CFH and CFI, two regulators of complement activation. Pathogenic variants may also produce reduced quantities of C3 protein (i.e., truncating variants or frameshifts that lead to premature stop variants) [Martínez-Barricarte et al 2010].

CFH

Gene structure.CFH has 23 exons that encode complement factor H, a protein of 1,231 amino acids. For a detailed summary ofgene and protein information, seeTable A,Gene.

Benign variants. Several variants ofCFH (some of which are common in the population) define an at-risk haplotype that has been associated with C3G [Hageman et al 2005,Servais et al 2007,Smith et al 2007,Zhang et al 2012,Johnson et al 2014,Xiao et al 2014,Merinero et al 2018,Riedl et al 2017,Osborne et al 2018].

Pathogenic variants.CFH pathogenic variants in C3G occur inheterozygous,homozygous, andcompound heterozygous states.CFH has been implicated in C3G by the following:

• A report of two sisters with DDD who werehomozygous for thec.670_672delAAG (p.Lys224del)pathogenic variant inCFH [Licht et al 2006,Zipfel et al 2006]. Factor H (fH) carrying this pathogenic variant is present in the serum at normal concentrations but is nonfunctional [Zipfel et al 2006]. The normal N-terminal activities of fH (C3b binding and complement regulation) are defective, indicating that dysfunctional fH is associated with the development of DDD [Licht et al 2006].
• Studies of skin fibroblasts from a child with fH deficiency and chronic hypocomplementemic renal disease and abnormal fH localization. One copy of ap.Cys536Argmissense variant and one copy of ap.Cys959Tyr missense variant were detected inCFH. Both pathogenic variants affect conserved cysteine residues characteristic of the short consensus-repeat (SCR) modules of fH and therefore predict profound changes in the higher-order structure of the 155-kd protein [Ault et al 1997].
• Two brothers with MPGN were reportedlyhomozygous for ap.Arg127Leu amino acid change inCFH [Dragon-Durey et al 2004]. Homozygosity for thismissense variant is associated with absence of fH in the serum, suggesting that this variant results in sequestration of the protein in the endoplasmic reticulum.

Table 6.

CFH Pathogenic Variants Discussed in ThisGeneReview

View in own window

DNA Nucleotide Change (Alias 1)	Predicted Protein Change (Alias 1)	Reference Sequences
c.380G>T	p.Arg127Leu	NM_000186​.3 NP_000177​.2
c.670_672delAAG	p.Lys224del (ΔLys224)
c.1606T>C (1679T>C)	p.Cys536Arg (Cys518Arg)
c.2655del	p.Arg885SerfsTer13
c.2876G>A (2949G>A)	p.Cys959Tyr (Cys991Tyr)

Variants listed in the table have been provided by the authors.GeneReviews staff have not independently verified the classification of variants.

GeneReviews follows the standard naming conventions of the Human Genome Variation Society (varnomen​.hgvs.org). SeeQuick Reference for an explanation of nomenclature.

1.

Variant designation that does not conform to current naming conventions

Normalgene product. Complement factor H (fH) protein is the key regulator of the alternative pathway of complement and is composed of 1,231 amino acids. Its structural organization is based on 20 homologous repeat domains (short consensus repeats [SCRs] or sushi domains). Each SCR has 60 amino acids. The first four SCRs (1-4) at the N-terminus are essential for fluid-phase complement regulation, binding of fH to C3b, decay acceleration activity of C3bBb, and fI cofactor activity in mediating the cleavage of C3b to iCb3. The last two SCRs (19-20) at the C terminus bind to cell surfaces to regulate C3 convertase in that microenvironment. SeeFigure 6.

Figure 6.

Schematic representation of factor H The 20 bead-like homologous short consensus repeats (SCRs) each have 60 amino acids. The first four SCRs (1-4) (red beads) regulate activation in the fluid phase, binding to C3b, decay acceleration activity, and fI(more...)

Abnormalgene product.CFH pathogenic variants associated with C3G are more frequently found in the N-terminal short consensus repeats (SCRs 1-4), a region essential for fluid-phase complement control. In contrast, in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS), pathogenic variants are more frequently located in the carboxy terminus (SCRs 18-20), a region involved in cell surface regulation.

Literature Cited

• Abrera-Abeleda MA, Nishimura C, Frees K, Jones M, Maga T, Katz LM, Zhang Y, Smith RJH. Allele variants of complement genes associated with dense deposit disease.J Am Soc Nephrol.2011;22:1551–9. [PMC free article: PMC3148710] [PubMed: 21784901]
• Abrera-Abeleda MA, Nishimura C, Smith JL, Sethi S, McRae JL, Murphy BF, Silvestri G, Skerka C, Józsi M, Zipfel PF, Hageman GS, Smith RJ. Variations in the complement regulatory genes factor H (CFH) and factor H related 5 (CFHR5) are associated with membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type II (dense deposit disease).J Med Genet.2006;43:582–9. [PMC free article: PMC2564553] [PubMed: 16299065]
• Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, et al. Studying gene expression and function. In:Molecular Biology of the Cell. 4 ed. New York: Garland Science. Available online. 2002. Accessed 2-23-22.
• Angelo JR, Bell CS, Braun MC. Allograft failure in kidney transplant recipients with membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis.Am J Kidney Dis.2011;57:291–9. [PubMed: 21215503]
• Appel GB, Cook HT, Hageman G, Jennette JC, Kashgarian M, Kirschfink M, Lambris JD, Lanning L, Lutz HU, Meri S, Rose NR, Salant DJ, Sethi S, Smith RJ, Smoyer W, Tully HF, Tully SP, Walker P, Welsh M, Wurzner R, Zipfel PF. Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type II (dense deposit disease): an update.J Am Soc Nephrol.2005;16:1392–403. [PubMed: 15800116]
• Athanasiou Y, Voskarides K, Gale DP, Damianou L, Patsias C, Zavros M, Maxwell PH, Cook HT, Demosthenous P, Hadjisavvas A, Kyriacou K, Zouvani I, Pierides A, Deltas C. Familial C3 glomerulopathy associated with CFHR5 mutations: clinical characteristics of 91 patients in 16 pedigrees.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol.2011;6:1436–46. [PMC free article: PMC3109942] [PubMed: 21566112]
• Ault BH, Schmidt BZ, Fowler NL, Kashtan CE, Ahmed AE, Vogt BA, Colten HR. Human factor H deficiency. Mutations in framework cysteine residues and block in H protein secretion and intracellular catabolism.J Biol Chem.1997;272:25168–75. [PubMed: 9312129]
• Azukaitis K, Simkova E, Majid MA, Galiano M, Benz K, Amann K, Bockmeyer C, Gajjar R, Meyers KE, Cheong HI, Lange-Sperandio B, Jungraithmayr T, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Bergmann C, Bereczki C, Miklaszewska M, Csuka D, Prohászka Z, Gipson P, Sampson MG, Lemaire M, Schaefer F. The phenotypic spectrum of nephropathies associated with mutations in diacylglycerol kinase ε.J Am Soc Nephrol.2017;28:3066–75. [PMC free article: PMC5619969] [PubMed: 28526779]
• Barbour TD, Pickering MC, Cook HT. Recent insights into C3 glomerulopathy.Nephrol Dial Transplant.2013a;28:1685–93. [PMC free article: PMC3707523] [PubMed: 23479095]
• Barbour TD, Pickering MC, Terence Cook H. Dense deposit disease and C3 glomerulopathy.Semin Nephrol.2013b;33:493–507. [PMC free article: PMC3820036] [PubMed: 24161036]
• Besbas N, Gulhan B, Gucer S, Korkmaz E, Ozaltin F. A novel CFHR5 mutation associated with C3 glomerulonephritis in a Turkish girl.J Nephrol.2014;27:457–60. [PubMed: 24536001]
• Blanc C, Togarsimalemath SK, Chauvet S, Le Quintrec M, Moulin B, Buchler M, Jokiranta TS, Roumenina LT, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Dragon-Durey MA. Anti-factor H autoantibodies in C3 glomerulopathies and in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: one target, two diseases.J Immunol.2015;194:5129–38. [PubMed: 25917093]
• Bomback AS, Smith RJ, Barile GR, Zhang Y, Heher EC, Herlitz L, Stokes MB, Markowitz GS, D'Agati VD, Canetta PA, Radhakrishnan J, Appel GB. Eculizumab for dense deposit disease and C3 glomerulonephritis.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol.2012;7:748–56. [PMC free article: PMC3338285] [PubMed: 22403278]
• Bu F, Borsa NG, Jones MB, Takanami E, Nishimura C, Hauer JJ, Azaiez H, Black-Ziegelbein EA, Meyer NC, Kolbe DL, Li Y, Frees K, Schnieders MJ, Thomas C, Nester C, Smith RJ. High-throughput genetic testing for thrombotic microangiopathies and C3 glomerulopathies.J Am Soc Nephrol.2016;27:1245–53. [PMC free article: PMC4814193] [PubMed: 26283675]
• Cameron JS, Turner DR, Heaton J, Williams DG, Ogg CS, Chantler C, Haycock GB, Hicks J. Idiopathic mesangiocapillary glomerulonephritis. Comparison of types I and II in children and adults and long-term prognosis.Am J Med.1983;74:175–92. [PubMed: 6337487]
• Cebeci Z, Bayraktar S, Oray M, Kir N. Multimodal imaging of membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type II.Saudi J Ophthalmol.2016;30:260–3. [PMC free article: PMC5161817] [PubMed: 28003788]
• Chauvet S, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Petitprez F, Karras A, Daniel L, Burtey S, Choukroun G, Delmas Y, Guerrot D, François A, Le Quintrec M, Javaugue V, Ribes D, Vrigneaud L, Arnulf B, Goujon JM, Ronco P, Touchard G, Bridoux F. Treatment of B-cell disorder improves renal outcome of patients with monoclonal gammopathy-associated C3 glomerulopathy.Blood.2017;129:1437–47. [PubMed: 28069603]
• Chen Q, Muller D, Rudolph B, Hartmann A, Kuwertz-Broking E, Wu K, Kirschfink M, Skerka C, Zipfel PF. Combined C3b and factor B autoantibodies and MPGN type II.N Engl J Med.2011;365:2340–2. [PubMed: 22168663]
• Chen Q, Wiesener M, Eberhardt HU, Hartmann A, Uzonyi B, Kirschfink M, Amann K, Buettner M, Goodship T, Hugo C, Skerka C, Zipfel PF. Complement factor H-related hybrid protein deregulates complement in dense deposit disease.J Clin Invest.2014;124:145–55. [PMC free article: PMC3871254] [PubMed: 24334459]
• Cook HT. C3 glomerulopathy.F1000Res.2017;6:248. [PMC free article: PMC5357035] [PubMed: 28357053]
• D'Agati VD, Bomback AS. C3 glomerulopathy: what's in a name?Kidney Int.2012;82:379–81. [PubMed: 22846813]
• Daina E, Noris M, Remuzzi G. Eculizumab in a patient with dense-deposit disease.N Engl J Med.2012;366:1161–3. [PubMed: 22435382]
• Dalvin LA, Fervenza FC, Sethi S, Pulido JS. Shedding light on fundus drusen associated with membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis: breaking stereotypes of types I, II, and III.Retin Cases Brief Rep.2016;10:72–8. [PubMed: 26110522]
• Deltas C, Gale D, Cook T, Voskarides K, Athanasiou Y, Pierides A. C3 glomerulonephritis/CFHR5 nephropathy is an endemic disease in Cyprus: clinical and molecular findings in 21 families.Adv Exp Med Biol.2013;735:189–96. [PubMed: 23402027]
• Dragon-Durey MA, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Loirat C, Blouin J, Niaudet P, Deschenes G, Coppo P, Herman Fridman W, Weiss L. Heterozygous and homozygous factor h deficiencies associated with hemolytic uremic syndrome or membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis: report and genetic analysis of 16 cases.J Am Soc Nephrol.2004;15:787–95. [PubMed: 14978182]
• D'Souza YB, Jones CJ, Short CD, Roberts IS, Bonshek RE. Oligosaccharide composition is similar in drusen and dense deposits in membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type II.Kidney Int.2009;75:824–7. [PubMed: 19177159]
• Eisinger AJ, Shortland JR, Moorhead PJ. Renal disease in partial lipodystrophy.Q J Med.1972;41:343–54. [PubMed: 4561162]
• Fang CJ, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Liszewski MK, Pianetti G, Noris M, Goodship TH, Atkinson JP. Membrane cofactor protein mutations in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS), fatal Stx-HUS, C3 glomerulonephritis, and the HELLP syndrome.Blood.2008;111:624–32. [PMC free article: PMC2200836] [PubMed: 17914026]
• Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Fakhouri F, Garnier A, Bienaimé F, Dragon-Durey MA, Ngo S, Moulin B, Servais A, Provot F, Rostaing L, Burtey S, Niaudet P, Deschênes G, Lebranchu Y, Zuber J, Loirat C. Genetics and outcome of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: a nationwide French series comparing children and adults.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol.2013;8:554–62. [PMC free article: PMC3613948] [PubMed: 23307876]
• Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Fakhouri F, Loirat C. Hemolytic-uremic syndrome: what is the mechanism?Rev Prat.2008;58:2093–6. [PubMed: 19213534]
• Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Weiss L, Brun P, Kazatchkine MD. Selective disappearance of C3NeF IgG autoantibody in the plasma of a patient with membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis following renal transplantation.Nephrol Dial Transplant.1994;9:811–4. [PubMed: 7970124]
• Fujita T, Nozu K, Iijima K, Kamioka I, Kaito H, Tanaka R, Nakanishi K, Matsuo M, Yoshikawa N. Long-term follow-up of juvenile acute nonproliferative glomerulitis (JANG).Pediatr Nephrol.2007;22:1957–61. [PubMed: 17674054]
• Gale DP, de Jorge EG, Cook HT, Martínez-Barricarte R, Hadjisavvas A, McLean AG, Pusey CD, Pierides A, Kyriacou K, Athanasiou Y, Voskarides K, Deltas C, Palmer A, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, de Cordoba SR, Maxwell PH, Pickering MC. Identification of a mutation in complement factor H-related protein 5 in patients of Cypriot origin with glomerulonephritis.Lancet.2010;376:794–801. [PMC free article: PMC2935536] [PubMed: 20800271]
• Gale DP, Owen-Casey M. Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis and C3 glomerulopathy. In: Harber M, ed.Practical Nephrology. London: Springer; 2014:189-202.
• Goicoechea de Jorge E, Gale DP, Cook HT, Martínez-Barricate A, Hadjisavvas A, Pusey CD, Palmer A, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Rodriguez de Cordoba S, Maxwell PH, Pickering MC. A mutant complement factor H-related 5 protein is associated with familial C3 glomerulonephritis.Mol Immunol.2009;46:2822.
• Gold B, Merriam JE, Zernant J, Hancox LS, Taiber AJ, Gehrs K, Cramer K, Neel J, Bergeron J, Barile GR, Smith RT, Hageman GS, Dean M, Allikmets R, et al. Variation in factor B (BF) and complement component 2 (C2) genes is associated with age-related macular degeneration.Nat Genet.2006;38:458–62. [PMC free article: PMC2921703] [PubMed: 16518403]
• Goodship TH, Cook HT, Fakhouri F, Fervenza FC, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Kavanagh D, Nester CM, Noris M, Pickering MC, Rodríguez de Córdoba S, Roumenina LT, Sethi S, Smith RJ, et al. Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome and C3 glomerulopathy: conclusions from a "Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes" (KDIGO) Controversies Conference.Kidney Int.2017;91:539–51. [PubMed: 27989322]
• Habib R, Gubler MC, Loirat C, Maiz HB, Levy M. Dense deposit disease: a variant of membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis.Kidney Int.1975;7:204–15. [PubMed: 1095806]
• Hageman GS, Anderson DH, Johnson LV, Hancox LS, Taiber AJ, Hardisty LI, Hageman JL, Stockman HA, Borchardt JD, Gehrs KM, Smith RJ, Silvestri G, Russell SR, Klaver CC, Barbazetto I, Chang S, Yannuzzi LA, Barile GR, Merriam JC, Smith RT, Olsh AK, Bergeron J, Zernant J, Merriam JE, Gold B, Dean M, Allikmets R. A common haplotype in the complement regulatory gene factor H (HF1/CFH) predisposes individuals to age-related macular degeneration.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.2005;102:7227–32. [PMC free article: PMC1088171] [PubMed: 15870199]
• Hulleman JD. Malattia Leventinese/Doyne honeycomb retinal dystrophy: similarities to age-related macular degeneration and potential therapies.Adv Exp Med Biol.2016;854:153–8. [PubMed: 26427406]
• Iatropoulos P, Noris M, Mele C, Piras R, Valoti E, Bresin E, Curreri M, Mondo E, Zito A, Gamba S, Bettoni S, Murer L, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Vivarelli M, Emma F, Daina E, Remuzzi G. Complement gene variants determine the risk of immunoglobulin-associated MPGN and C3 glomerulopathy and predict long-term renal outcome.Mol Immunol.2016;71:131–42. [PubMed: 26895476]
• Imamura H, Konomoto T, Tanaka E, Hisano S, Yoshida Y, Fujimura Y, Miyata T, Nunoi H. Familial C3 glomerulonephritis associated with mutations in the gene for complement factor B.Nephrol Dial Transplant.2015;30:862–4. [PubMed: 25758434]
• Johnson SA, Wong EK, Taylor CM. Making sense of the spectrum of glomerular disease associated with complement dysregulation.Pediatr Nephrol.2014;29:1883–94. [PubMed: 23852337]
• Kambham N. Postinfectious glomerulonephritis.Adv Anat Pathol.2012;19:338–47. [PubMed: 22885383]
• Khalighi MA, Wang S, Henriksen KJ, Bock M, Keswani M, Meehan SM, Chang A. Revisiting post-infectious glomerulonephritis in the emerging era of C3 glomerulopathy.Clin Kidney J.2016;9:397–402. [PMC free article: PMC4886922] [PubMed: 27274823]
• Kobayashi Y, Yang S, Nykamp K, Garcia J, Lincoln SE, Topper SE. Pathogenic variant burden in the ExAC database: an empirical approach to evaluating population data for clinical variant interpretation.Genome Med.2017;9:13. [PMC free article: PMC5295186] [PubMed: 28166811]
• Kurtz KA, Schlueter AJ. Management of membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type II with plasmapheresis.J Clin Apher.2002;17:135–7. [PubMed: 12378549]
• Lemaire M, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Schaefer F, Choi M, Tang WH, Le Quintrec M, Fakhouri F, Taque S, Nobili F, Martínez F, Ji W, Overton JD, Mane SM, Nürnberg G, Altmüller J, Thiele H, Morin D, Deschenes G, Baudouin V, Llanas B, Collard L, Majid MA, Simkova E, Nürnberg P, Rioux-Leclerc N, Moeckel GW, Gubler MC, Hwa J, Loirat C, Lifton RP. Recessive mutations in DGKE cause atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome.Nat Genet.2013;45:531–6. [PMC free article: PMC3719402] [PubMed: 23542698]
• Licht C, Fremeaux-Bacchi V. Hereditary and acquired complement dysregulation in membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis.Thromb Haemost.2009;101:271–8. [PubMed: 19190809]
• Licht C, Heinen S, Jozsi M, Loschmann I, Saunders RE, Perkins SJ, Skerka C, Kirschfink M, Hoppe B, Zipfel PF. Deletion of Lys224 in regulatory domain 4 of factor H reveals a novel pathomechanism for dense deposit disease (MPGNII).Kidney Int.2006;70:42–50. [PubMed: 16612335]
• Licht C, Mengel M. Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. In: Geary DF, Schaefer F, eds.Comprehensive Pediatric Nephrology. 1 ed. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby; 2008:269-89.
• Liszewski MK, Atkinson JP. Complement regulator CD46: genetic variants and disease associations.Hum Genomics.2015;9:7. [PMC free article: PMC4469999] [PubMed: 26054645]
• Lu DF, McCarthy AM, Lanning LD, Delaney C, Porter C. A descriptive study of individuals with membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis.Nephrol Nurs J.2007;34:295–302. [PubMed: 17644874]
• Lu DF, Moon M, Lanning LD, McCarthy AM, Smith RJ. Clinical features and outcomes of 98 children and adults with dense deposit disease.Pediatr Nephrol.2012;27:773–81. [PMC free article: PMC4423603] [PubMed: 22105967]
• Malik TH, Lavin PJ, Goicoechea de Jorge E, Vernon KA, Rose KL, Patel MP, de Leeuw M, Neary JJ, Conlon PJ, Winn MP, Pickering MC. A hybrid CFHR3-1 gene causes familial C3 glomerulopathy.J Am Soc Nephrol.2012;23:1155–60. [PMC free article: PMC3380655] [PubMed: 22626820]
• Marks SD, Rees L. Spontaneous clinical improvement in dense deposit disease.Pediatr Nephrol.2000;14:322–4. [PubMed: 10775078]
• Martínez-Barricarte R, Heurich M, Valdes-Cañedo F, Vazquez-Martul E, Torreira E, Montes T, Tortajada A, Pinto S, Lopez-Trascasa M, Morgan BP, Llorca O, Harris CL, Rodríguez de Córdoba S. Human C3 mutation reveals a mechanism of dense deposit disease pathogenesis and provides insights into complement activation and regulation.J Clin Invest.2010;120:3702–12. [PMC free article: PMC2947238] [PubMed: 20852386]
• Mathieson PW, Peters DK. Lipodystrophy in MCGN type II: the clue to links between the adipocyte and the complement system.Nephrol Dial Transplant.1997;12:1804–6. [PubMed: 9306323]
• McCaughan JA, O'Rourke DM, Courtney AE. Recurrent dense deposit disease after renal transplantation: an emerging role for complementary therapies.Am J Transplant.2012;12:1046–51. [PubMed: 22233157]
• McRae JL, Cowan PJ, Power DA, Mitchelhill KI, Kemp BE, Morgan BP, Murphy BF. Human factor H-related protein 5 (FHR-5). A new complement-associated protein.J Biol Chem.2001;276:6747–54. [PubMed: 11058592]
• McRae JL, Duthy TG, Griggs KM, Ormsby RJ, Cowan PJ, Cromer BA, McKinstry WJ, Parker MW, Murphy BF, Gordon DL. Human factor H-related protein 5 has cofactor activity, inhibits C3 convertase activity, binds heparin and C-reactive protein, and associates with lipoprotein.J Immunol.2005;174:6250–6. [PubMed: 15879123]
• Medjeral-Thomas N, Malik TH, Patel MP, Toth T, Cook HT, Tomson C, Pickering MC. A novel CFHR5 fusion protein causes C3 glomerulopathy in a family without Cypriot ancestry.Kidney Int.2014;85:933–7. [PMC free article: PMC3789233] [PubMed: 24067434]
• Merinero HM, García SP, García-Fernández J, Arjona E, Tortajada A, Rodríguez de Córdoba S. Complete functional characterization of disease-associated genetic variants in the complement factor H gene.Kidney Int.2018;93:470–81. [PubMed: 28941939]
• Mullins RF, Aptsiauri N, Hageman GS. Structure and composition of drusen associated with glomerulonephritis: implications for the role of complement activation in drusen biogenesis.Eye (Lond).2001;15:390–5. [PubMed: 11450763]
• Murphy B, Georgiou T, Machet D, Hill P, McRae J. Factor H-related protein-5: a novel component of human glomerular immune deposits.Am J Kidney Dis.2002;39:24–7. [PubMed: 11774097]
• Nasr SH, Valeri AM, Appel GB, Sherwinter J, Stokes MB, Said SM, Markowitz GS, D'Agati VD. Dense deposit disease: clinicopathologic study of 32 pediatric and adult patients.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol.2009;4:22–32. [PMC free article: PMC2615696] [PubMed: 18971369]
• Nava J, Moran S, Figueroa V, Salinas A, Lopez M, Urbina R, Gutierrez A, Lujan JL, Orozco A, Montufar R, Piccoli GB. Successful pregnancy in a CKD patient on a low-protein, supplemented diet: an opportunity to reflect on CKD and pregnancy in Mexico, an emerging country.J Nephrol.2017;30:877–82. [PubMed: 28918595]
• Nester CM, Smith RJ. Complement inhibition in C3 glomerulopathy.Semin Immunol.2016;28:241–9. [PubMed: 27402056]
• Nester CM, Smith RJ. Diagnosis and treatment of C3 glomerulopathy.Clin Nephrol.2013a;80:395–403. [PubMed: 23993166]
• Nester CM, Smith RJ. Treatment options for C3 glomerulopathy.Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens.2013b;22:231–7. [PMC free article: PMC4437761] [PubMed: 23318699]
• Nicolas C, Vuiblet V, Baudouin V, Macher MA, Vrillon I, Biebuyck-Gouge N, Dehennault M, Gié S, Morin D, Nivet H, Nobili F, Ulinski T, Ranchin B, Marinozzi MC, Ngo S, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Pietrement C. C3 nephritic factor associated with C3 glomerulopathy in children.Pediatr Nephrol.2014;29:85–94. [PubMed: 24068526]
• Nilsson SC, Kalchishkova N, Trouw LA, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Villoutreix BO, Blom AM. Mutations in complement factor I as found in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome lead to either altered secretion or altered function of factor I.Eur J Immunol.2010;40:172–85. [PubMed: 19877009]
• Noris M, Remuzzi G. Genetics of immune-mediated glomerular diseases: focus on complement.Semin Nephrol.2017;37:447–63. [PubMed: 28863792]
• Noris M, Remuzzi G. Glomerular diseases dependent on complement activation, including atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, and C3 glomerulopathy: core curriculum 2015.Am J Kidney Dis.2015;66:359–75. [PMC free article: PMC4528072] [PubMed: 26032627]
• Ohi H, Watanabe S, Fujita T, Yasugi T. Significance of C3 nephritic factor (C3NeF) in non-hypocomplementaemic serum with membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN).Clin Exp Immunol.1992;89:479–84. [PMC free article: PMC1554488] [PubMed: 1516262]
• Osborne AJ, Breno M, Borsa NG, Bu F, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Gale DP, van den Heuvel LP, Kavanagh D, Noris M, Pinto S, Rallapalli PM, Remuzzi G, Rodríguez de Cordoba S, Ruiz A, Smith RJH, Vieira-Martins P, Volokhina E, Wilson V, Goodship THJ, Perkins SJ. Statistical validation of rare complement variants provides insights into the molecular basis of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome and C3 glomerulopathy.J Immunol.2018;2018;200:2464–78. [PMC free article: PMC6324840] [PubMed: 29500241]
• Ossoli A, Lucca F, Boscutti G, Remaley AT, Calabresi L. Familial LCAT deficiency: from pathology to enzyme replacement therapy.Clinical Lipidology.2015;10:405–13.
• Ozaltin F, Li B, Rauhauser A, An SW, Soylemezoglu O, Gonul II, Taskiran EZ, Ibsirlioglu T, Korkmaz E, Bilginer Y, Duzova A, Ozen S, Topaloglu R, Besbas N, Ashraf S, Du Y, Liang C, Chen P, Lu D, Vadnagara K, Arbuckle S, Lewis D, Wakeland B, Quigg RJ, Ransom RF, Wakeland EK, Topham MK, Bazan NG, Mohan C, Hildebrandt F, Bakkaloglu A, Huang CL, Attanasio M. DGKE variants cause a glomerular microangiopathy that mimics membranoproliferative GN.J Am Soc Nephrol.2013;24:377–84. [PMC free article: PMC3582208] [PubMed: 23274426]
• Paixão-Cavalcante D, López-Trascasa M, Skattum L, Giclas PC, Goodship TH, de Córdoba SR, Truedsson L, Morgan BP, Harris CL. Sensitive and specific assays for C3 nephritic factors clarify mechanisms underlying complement dysregulation.Kidney Int.2012;82:1084–92. [PMC free article: PMC3608896] [PubMed: 22854646]
• Piccoli GB, Alrukhaimi M, Liu ZH, Zakharova E, Levin A, et al. What we do and do not know about women and kidney diseases; questions unanswered and answers unquestioned: reflection on World Kidney Day and International Woman's Day.BMC Nephrol.2018;19:66. [PMC free article: PMC5856379] [PubMed: 29544451]
• Pickering MC, D'Agati VD, Nester CM, Smith RJ, Haas M, Appel GB, Alpers CE, Bajema IM, Bedrosian C, Braun M, Doyle M, Fakhouri F, Fervenza FC, Fogo AB, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Gale DP, Goicoechea de Jorge E, Griffin G, Harris CL, Holers VM, Johnson S, Lavin PJ, Medjeral-Thomas N, Paul Morgan B, Nast CC, Noel LH, Peters DK, Rodríguez de Córdoba S, Servais A, Sethi S, Song WC, Tamburini P, Thurman JM, Zavros M, Cook HT. C3 glomerulopathy: consensus report.Kidney Int.2013;84:1079–89. [PMC free article: PMC3842953] [PubMed: 24172683]
• Rabasco C, Cavero T, Román E, Rojas-Rivera J, Olea T, Espinosa M, Cabello V, Fernández-Juarez G, González F, Ávila A, Baltar JM, Díaz M, Alegre R, Elías S, Antón M, Frutos MA, Pobes A, Blasco M, Martín F, Bernis C, Macías M, Barroso S, de Lorenzo A, Ariceta G, López-Mendoza M, Rivas B, López-Revuelta K, Campistol JM, Mendizábal S, de Córdoba SR, Praga M, et al. Effectiveness of mycophenolate mofetil in C3 glomerulonephritis.Kidney Int.2015;88:1153–60. [PubMed: 26221755]
• Recalde S, Tortajada A, Subias M, Anter J, Blasco M, Maranta R, Coco R, Pinto S, Noris M, García-Layana A, Rodríguez de Córdoba S. Molecular basis of factor H R1210C association with ocular and renal diseases.J Am Soc Nephrol.2016;27:1305–11. [PMC free article: PMC4849834] [PubMed: 26376859]
• Riedl M, Thorner P, Licht C. C3 glomerulopathy.Pediatr Nephrol.2017;32:43–57. [PubMed: 27056062]
• Rodríguez de Córdoba S, Esparza-Gordillo J, Goicoechea de Jorge E, Lopez-Trascasa M, Sanchez-Corral P. The human complement factor H: functional roles, genetic variations and disease associations.Mol Immunol.2004;41:355–67. [PubMed: 15163532]
• Salvadori M, Bertoni E. Complement related kidney diseases: recurrence after transplantation.World J Transplant.2016;6:632–45. [PMC free article: PMC5175220] [PubMed: 28058212]
• Savige J, Amos L, Ierino F, Mack HG, Symons RC, Hughes P, Nicholls K, Colville D. Retinal disease in the C3 glomerulopathies and the risk of impaired vision.Ophthalmic Genet.2016;37:369–76. [PubMed: 26915021]
• Schwertz R, Rother U, Anders D, Gretz N, Scharer K, Kirschfink M. Complement analysis in children with idiopathic membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis: a long-term follow-up.Pediatr Allergy Immunol.2001;12:166–72. [PubMed: 11473682]
• Servais A, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Lequintrec M, Salomon R, Blouin J, Knebelmann B, Grünfeld JP, Lesavre P, Noël LH, Fakhouri F. Primary glomerulonephritis with isolated C3 deposits: a new entity which shares common genetic risk factors with haemolytic uraemic syndrome.J Med Genet.2007;44:193–9. [PMC free article: PMC2598029] [PubMed: 17018561]
• Servais A, Noël LH, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Lesavre P. C3 glomerulopathy.Contrib Nephrol.2013;181:185–93. [PubMed: 23689580]
• Servais A, Noel LH, Roumenina LT, Le Quintrec M, Ngo S, Dragon-Durey MA, Macher MA, Zuber J, Karras A, Provot F, Moulin B, Grünfeld JP, Niaudet P, Lesavre P, Fremeaux-Bacchi V. Acquired and genetic complement abnormalities play a critical role in dense deposit disease and other C3 glomerulopathies.Kidney Int.2012;82:454–64. [PubMed: 22456601]
• Sessa A, Battini G, Meroni M, Daidone G, Carnera I, Brambilla PL, Vigano G, Giordano F, Pallotti F, Torri Tarelli L, Calabresi L, Rolleri M, Bertolini S. Hypocomplementemic type II membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis in a male patient with familial lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase deficiency due to two different allelic mutations.Nephron.2001;88:268–72. [PubMed: 11423760]
• Sethi S, Fervenza FC. Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis: pathogenetic heterogeneity and proposal for a new classification.Semin Nephrol.2011;31:341–8. [PubMed: 21839367]
• Sethi S, Fervenza FC, Zhang Y, Zand L, Meyer NC, Borsa N, Nasr SH, Smith RJ. Atypical post-infectious glomerulonephritis is associated with abnormalities in the alternative pathway of complement.Kidney Int.2013;83:293–9. [PMC free article: PMC3561505] [PubMed: 23235567]
• Sethi S, Fervenza FC, Zhang Y, Zand L, Vrana JA, Nasr SH, Theis JD, Dogan A, Smith RJ. C3 glomerulonephritis: clinicopathological findings, complement abnormalities, glomerular proteomic profile, treatment, and follow-up.Kidney Int.2012a;82:465–73. [PMC free article: PMC4438675] [PubMed: 22673887]
• Sethi S, Haas M, Markowitz GS, D'Agati VD, Rennke HG, Jennette JC, Bajema IM, Alpers CE, Chang A, Cornell LD, Cosio FG, Fogo AB, Glassock RJ, Hariharan S, Kambham N, Lager DJ, Leung N, Mengel M, Nath KA, Roberts IS, Rovin BH, Seshan SV, Smith RJ, Walker PD, Winearls CG, Appel GB, Alexander MP, Cattran DC, Casado CA, Cook HT, De Vriese AS, Radhakrishnan J, Racusen LC, Ronco P, Fervenza FC. Mayo Clinic/Renal Pathology Society Consensus Report on Pathologic Classification, Diagnosis, and Reporting of GN.J Am Soc Nephrol.2016;27:1278–87. [PMC free article: PMC4849835] [PubMed: 26567243]
• Sethi S, Nester CM, Smith RJ. Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis and C3 glomerulopathy: resolving the confusion.Kidney Int.2012b;81:434–41. [PMC free article: PMC4428602] [PubMed: 22157657]
• Smith RJ, Alexander J, Barlow PN, Botto M, Cassavant TL, Cook HT, de Cordoba SR, Hageman GS, Jokiranta TS, Kimberling WJ, Lambris JD, Lanning LD, Levidiotis V, Licht C, Lutz HU, Meri S, Pickering MC, Quigg RJ, Rops AL, Salant DJ, Sethi S, Thurman JM, Tully HF, Tully SP, van der Vlag J, Walker PD, Wurzner R, Zipfel PF. New approaches to the treatment of dense deposit disease.J Am Soc Nephrol.2007;18:2447–56. [PMC free article: PMC4853920] [PubMed: 17675665]
• Sohn EH, Wang K, Thompson S, Riker MJ, Hoffmann JM, Stone EM, Mullins RF. Comparison of drusen and modifying genes in autosomal dominant radial drusen and age-related macular degeneration.Retina.2015;35:48–57. [PMC free article: PMC5513174] [PubMed: 25077532]
• Sotsiou F. Postinfectious glomerulonephritis.Nephrol Dial Transplant.2001;16 Suppl 6:68–70. [PubMed: 11568248]
• Spitzer RE, Stitzel AE. Loss of autoantibody activity by alteration in autoantigen.Clin Immunol Immunopathol.1996;80:211–3. [PubMed: 8764567]
• Stone EM, Lotery AJ, Munier FL, Heon E, Piguet B, Guymer RH, Vandenburgh K, Cousin P, Nishimura D, Swiderski RE, Silvestri G, Mackey DA, Hageman GS, Bird AC, Sheffield VC, Schorderet DF. A single EFEMP1 mutation associated with both Malattia Leventinese and Doyne honeycomb retinal dystrophy.Nat Genet.1999;22:199–202. [PubMed: 10369267]
• Strobel S, Zimmering M, Papp K, Prechl J, Józsi M. Anti-factor B autoantibody in dense deposit disease.Mol Immunol.2010;47:1476–83. [PubMed: 20193965]
• Thomas S, Ranganathan D, Francis L, Madhan K, John GT. Current concepts in C3 glomerulopathy.Indian J Nephrol.2014;24:339–48. [PMC free article: PMC4244712] [PubMed: 25484526]
• Togarsimalemath SK, Sethi SK, Duggal R, Quintrec ML, Jha P, Daniel R, Gonnet F, Bansal S, Roumenina LT, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Kher V, Dragon-Durey MA. A novel CFHR1-CFHR5 hybrid leads to a familial dominant C3 glomerulopathy.Kidney Int.2017;92:876–87. [PubMed: 28729035]
• Tortajada A, Yébenes H, Abarrategui-Garrido C, Anter J, García-Fernández JM, Martínez-Barricarte R, Alba-Domínguez M, Malik TH, Bedoya R, Cabrera Pérez R, López Trascasa M, Pickering MC, Harris CL, Sánchez-Corral P, Llorca O, Rodríguez de Córdoba S. C3 glomerulopathy-associated CFHR1 mutation alters FHR oligomerization and complement regulation.J Clin Invest.2013;123:2434–46. [PMC free article: PMC3668852] [PubMed: 23728178]
• Vaclavik V, Munier FL. Malattia Leventinese (autosomal dominant drusen). In: Querques G, Souied E, eds.Macular Dystrophies. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2016:39-51.
• Vernon KA, Goicoechea de Jorge E, Hall AE, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Aitman TJ, Cook HT, Hangartner R, Koziell A, Pickering MC. Acute presentation and persistent glomerulonephritis following streptococcal infection in a patient with heterozygous complement factor H-related protein 5 deficiency.Am J Kidney Dis.2012;60:121–5. [PMC free article: PMC3382710] [PubMed: 22503529]
• Vivarelli M, Emma F. Treatment of C3 glomerulopathy with complement blockers.Semin Thromb Hemost.2014;40:472–7. [PubMed: 24799307]
• Walker PD, Ferrario F, Joh K, Bonsib SM. Dense deposit disease is not a membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis.Mod Pathol.2007;20:605–16. [PubMed: 17396142]
• West CD, McAdams AJ, Witte DP. Acute non-proliferative glomerulitis: a cause of renal failure unique to children.Pediatr Nephrol.2000;14:786–93. [PubMed: 10955928]
• Westland R, Bodria M, Carrea A, Lata S, Scolari F, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, D'Agati VD, Lifton RP, Gharavi AG, Ghiggeri GM, Sanna-Cherchi S. Phenotypic expansion of DGKE-associated diseases.J Am Soc Nephrol.2014;25:1408–14. [PMC free article: PMC4073436] [PubMed: 24511134]
• Xiao X, Ghossein C, Tortajada A, Zhang Y, Meyer N, Jones M, Borsa NG, Nester CM, Thomas CP, de Córdoba SR, Smith RJ. Familial C3 glomerulonephritis caused by a novel CFHR5-CFHR2 fusion gene.Mol Immunol.2016;77:89–96. [PubMed: 27490940]
• Xiao X, Pickering MC, Smith RJH. C3 glomerulopathy: the genetic and clinical findings in dense deposit disease and C3 glomerulonephritis.Semin Thromb Hemost.2014;40:465–71. [PubMed: 24799308]
• Zand L, Lorenz EC, Cosio FG, Fervenza FC, Nasr SH, Gandhi MJ, Smith RJ, Sethi S. Clinical findings, pathology, and outcomes of C3GN after kidney transplantation.J Am Soc Nephrol.2014;25:1110–7. [PMC free article: PMC4005307] [PubMed: 24357668]
• Zhang Y, Meyer NC, Fervenza FC, Lau W, Keenan A, Cara-Fuentes G, Shao D, Akber A, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Sethi S, Nester CM, Smith RJ. C4 nephritic factors in C3 glomerulopathy: a case series.Am J Kidney Dis.2017;70:834–43. [PMC free article: PMC5701858] [PubMed: 28838767]
• Zhang Y, Meyer NC, Wang K, Nishimura C, Frees K, Jones M, Katz LM, Sethi S, Smith RJ. Causes of alternative pathway dysregulation in dense deposit disease.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol.2012;7:265–74. [PMC free article: PMC3280037] [PubMed: 22223606]
• Zhang Y, Nester CM, Holanda DG, Marsh HC, Hammond RA, Thomas LJ, Meyer NC, Hunsicker LG, Sethi S, Smith RJ. Soluble CR1 therapy improves complement regulation in C3 glomerulopathy.J Am Soc Nephrol.2013;24:1820–9. [PMC free article: PMC3810083] [PubMed: 23907509]
• Zhu J, Chaki M, Lu D, Ren C, Wang SS, Rauhauser A, Li B, Zimmerman S, Jun B, Du Y, Vadnagara K, Wang H, Elhadi S, Quigg RJ, Topham MK, Mohan C, Ozaltin F, Zhou XJ, Marciano DK, Bazan NG, Attanasio M. Loss of diacylglycerol kinase epsilon in mice causes endothelial distress and impairs glomerular Cox-2 and PGE2 production.Am J Physiol Renal Physiol.2016;310:F895–908. [PMC free article: PMC4867310] [PubMed: 26887830]
• Zipfel PF, Skerka C, Chen Q, Wiech T, Goodship T, Johnson S, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Nester C, de Córdoba SR, Noris M, Pickering M, Smith R. The role of complement in C3 glomerulopathy.Mol Immunol.2015;67:21–30. [PubMed: 25929733]
• Zipfel PF, Smith RJH, Heinen ST. The role of complement in membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. In: Zipfel PF, ed.Complement and Kidney Disease. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2006:199-221.

Author Notes

Contact Information

Richard JH Smith
Division of Nephrology
University of Iowa
200 Hawkins Drive
Iowa City, IA 52242
Telephone: 319-356-3612
Fax: 319-356-4108
Email: richard-smith@uiowa.edu

Acknowledgments

Supported in part by grant RO1-DK110023 from the NIDDK (RJHS)

Author History

Johnny Cruz Corchado; University of Iowa (2011-2018)
Bertha Martín, PhD (2018-present)
Sanjeev Sethi, MD, PhD; Mayo Clinic (2007-2011)
Richard JH Smith, MD (2007-present)
Peter F Zipfel, PhD habil Prof; Hans Knöll Institute (2007-2011)

Revision History

• 5 April 2018 (ha) Comprehensive update posted live
• 19 May 2011 (me) Comprehensive update posted live
• 2 January 2008 (rjhs/cd) Revision: clinical testing (sequence analysis) forCFHR5 mutations
• 20 July 2007 (me) Review posted live
• 17 August 2005 (rjhs) Original submission