NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Adam MP, Feldman J, Mirzaa GM, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2025.
J Lloyd Holder, Jr, MD, PhD,Fadi F Hamdan, PhD, andJacques L Michaud, MD.
Author Information and AffiliationsInitial Posting:February 21, 2019.
Estimated reading time: 17 minutes
SYNGAP1-related intellectual disability (SYNGAP1-ID) is characterized by developmental delay (DD) or intellectual disability (ID) (100% of affected individuals), generalized epilepsy (~84%), and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and other behavioral abnormalities (≤50%). To date more than 50 individuals withSYNGAP1-ID have been reported. In the majority DD/ID was moderate to severe; in some it was mild. The epilepsy is generalized; a subset of individuals with epilepsy have myoclonic astatic epilepsy (Doose syndrome) or epilepsy with myoclonic absences. Behavioral abnormalities can include stereotypic behaviors (e.g., hand flapping, obsessions with certain objects) as well as poor social development. Feeding difficulties can be significant in some.
The diagnosis ofSYNGAP1-ID is established in aproband with developmental delay or intellectual disability in whommolecular genetic testing identifies either aheterozygouspathogenic variant inSYNGAP1 (~89%) or adeletion of 6p21.3 (~11%).
Treatment of manifestations: DD/ID are managed as per standard practice. No guidelines are available regarding choice of specific anti-seizure medications (ASMs). In about 50% of patients, the epilepsy responds to a single ASM; in the remainder it is pharmacoresistant. Children may qualify for and benefit from interventions used in treatment of ASD. Consultation with a developmental pediatrician may guide parents through appropriate behavioral management strategies and/or provide prescription medications when necessary. Nasogastric/gastrostomy feeding may be required for individuals with persistent feeding issues.
Surveillance: Monitor seizure manifestations and control; behavioral issues; developmental progress and educational needs.
SYNGAP1-ID is inherited in anautosomal dominant manner. To date almost all probands withSYNGAP1-ID whose parents have undergonemolecular genetic testing have had ade novogermlinepathogenic variant; however, vertical transmission (from a mildly affected, mosaic parent to theproband) has been reported in one family. Thus, while the risk to sibs appears to be low, it is presumed to be greater than in the general population because of the possibility ofgermline mosaicism in a parent. Once theSYNGAP1 pathogenic variant has been identified in an affected family member,prenatal testing for a pregnancy at increased risk andpreimplantation genetic testing are possible.
No formal diagnostic criteria have been published forSYNGAP1-related intellectual disability.
SYNGAP1-related intellectual disability (SYNGAP1-ID)should be considered in individuals with developmental delay or intellectual disability with or without:
The diagnosis ofSYNGAP1-IDis established in aproband with developmental delay (DD) or intellectual disability (ID) in whommolecular genetic testing (seeTable 1) identifies either:
Note: Per ACMG/AMP variant interpretation guidelines, the terms "pathogenic variants" and "likely pathogenic variants" are synonymous in a clinical setting, meaning that both are considered diagnostic and both can be used for clinical decision making [Richards et al 2015]. Reference to "pathogenic variants" in this section is understood to include any likely pathogenic variants.
Molecular genetic testing in a child with DD or an older individual with ID typically begins withchromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). If CMA is not diagnostic, the next step is typically either amultigene panel orexome sequencing. Note: Single-gene testing (sequence analysis ofSYNGAP1, followed by gene-targeteddeletion/duplication analysis) is rarely useful and typically NOT recommended.
CMA uses oligonucleotide or SNP arrays to detect genome-wide large deletions/duplications (includingSYNGAP1) that cannot be detected bysequence analysis. Note: The ability to determine the size of thedeletion/duplication depends on the type of microarray used and the density of probes in the 6p21.32 region.
An IDmultigene panel that includesSYNGAP1 and other genes of interest (seeDifferential Diagnosis) is most likely to identify the genetic cause of the condition in a person with a nondiagnostic CMA while limiting identification of variants ofuncertain significance and pathogenic variants in genes that do not explain the underlyingphenotype. Note: (1) The genes included in the panel and the diagnosticsensitivity of the testing used for eachgene vary by laboratory and are likely to change over time. (2) Some multigene panels may include genes not associated with the condition discussed in thisGeneReview. (3) In some laboratories, panel options may include a custom laboratory-designed panel and/or custom phenotype-focusedexome analysis that includes genes specified by the clinician. (4) Methods used in a panel may includesequence analysis,deletion/duplication analysis, and/or other non-sequencing-based tests. For this disorder, an ID multigene panel that also includes deletion/duplication analysis is recommended (seeTable 1).
For an introduction to multigene panels clickhere. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genetic tests can be foundhere.
Exome sequencing, which does not require the clinician to determine whichgene is likely involved, has the advantage over an IDmultigene panel of detecting variants in recently identified rare genes not yet included in some ID multigene panels.
For an introduction to comprehensivegenomic testing clickhere. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genomic testing can be foundhere.
Molecular Genetic Testing Used inSYNGAP1-Related Intellectual Disability
Gene 1 | Method | Proportion of Probands with a Pathogenic Variant 2 Detectable by Method 3 |
---|---|---|
SYNGAP1 | Sequence analysis 4 | 49/55 (89%) |
Gene-targeteddeletion/duplication analysis 5 | Unknown; see footnote 6. | |
Chromosomal microarray analysis 7 | 6/55 (11%) |
SeeTable A. Genes and Databases forchromosomelocus and protein.
Based on a review of published series and case reports
Krepischi et al [2010],Pinto et al [2010],Vissers et al [2010],Hamdan et al [2011a],Hamdan et al [2011b],Klitten et al [2011],Zollino et al [2011],de Ligt et al [2012],Rauch et al [2012],Berryer et al [2013],Carvill et al [2013],Writzl & Knegt [2013],Redin et al [2014],Parker et al [2015],Mignot et al [2016],Prchalova et al [2017]
Sequence analysis detects variants that are benign,likely benign, ofuncertain significance,likely pathogenic, or pathogenic. Variants may include small intragenic deletions/insertions andmissense,nonsense, andsplice site variants; typically,exon or whole-gene deletions/duplications are not detected. For issues to consider in interpretation ofsequence analysis results, clickhere.
Gene-targeteddeletion/duplication analysis detects intragenic deletions or duplications. Methods used may include a range of techniques such asquantitative PCR, long-range PCR, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), and agene-targeted microarray designed to detect single-exon deletions or duplications.
Gene-targeted methods will detect deletions of a singleexon up to a wholegene; however, breakpoints of large deletions and/ordeletion of adjacent genes may not be determined. If a whole-gene deletion is detected by a gene-targeted deletion/duplication assay, CMA is needed to determine the size of the deletion.
Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) using oligonucleotide arrays or SNP arrays. CMA designs in current clinical use target the 6p21.3 region; however, some 6p21.3 deletions may not have been detectable by older oligonucleotide or BAC platforms.
Since the original description ofSYNGAP1-related intellectual disability (SYNGAP1-ID) in three individuals [Hamdan et al 2009], more than 50 affected individuals with detailed clinical information have been reported [Krepischi et al 2010,Pinto et al 2010,Vissers et al 2010,Hamdan et al 2011a,Hamdan et al 2011b,Klitten et al 2011,Zollino et al 2011,de Ligt et al 2012,Rauch et al 2012,Berryer et al 2013,Carvill et al 2013,Writzl & Knegt 2013,Redin et al 2014,Parker et al 2015,Mignot et al 2016,Prchalova et al 2017]. The following description of the phenotypic features associated with this condition is based on these reports.
Developmental delay and intellectual disability. The great majority of affected children present with developmental delay or intellectual disability that is typically moderate to severe but can be mild.
Early motor development is characterized by hypotonia. The average age at walking was 26 months (range: 10.5 months to 5 years). A subset of these children had an ataxic gait that remained stable or improved over time.
Language is generally impaired; a third of individuals age five years or more remain nonverbal. In those who are verbal, language development ranges from use of single words only to four-to-five-word sentences.
Epilepsy. Approximately 84% of individuals withSYNGAP1-ID have generalized epilepsy; a subset of these were diagnosed with myoclonic astatic epilepsy (Doose syndrome) or epilepsy with myoclonic absences [Mignot et al 2016].
While the epilepsy responds to a single anti-seizure medication in approximately half of affected individuals, it is pharmacoresistant in the remainder. Children with refractory seizures may be diagnosed with epileptic encephalopathy (i.e., refractory seizures and cognitive slowing or regression associated with frequent ongoing epileptiform activity).
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and other behavioral abnormalities. The occurrence of ASD could be as high as 50%. This includes stereotypic behaviors such as hand flapping, obsessions with certain objects, and poor social development. In addition, inattention, impulsivity, self-directed and other-directed aggressive behavior, elevated pain threshold, hyperacusis, and sleep disorders have been observed.
Other associated features include the following:
Life span. It is unknown if life span inSYNGAP1-ID is abnormal. One reported individual is alive at age 31 years [Prchalova et al 2017], demonstrating that survival into adulthood is possible. Since many adults with disabilities have not undergone advanced genetic testing, it is likely that adults with this condition are underrecognized and underreported.
No definitivephenotype-genotype correlation between the type ofSYNGAP1pathogenic variant (missense, truncating, large intragenicdeletion) and cognitive abilities or the occurrence of comorbidities has been observed.
Penetrance is 100%. All individuals withgermline pathogenic variants inSYNGAP1 have developmental delay, cognitive dysfunction, intellectual disability, and/or epilepsy.
The prevalence ofSYNGAP1 pathogenic variants in two studies was:
No phenotypes other than those discussed in thisGeneReview are known to be associated withgermline pathogenic variants inSYNGAP1.
Thephenotype associated withSYNGAP1-related intellectual disability (ID) overlaps with that of other disorders of ID and epileptic encephalopathy.
Most genes known to be associated with ID (seeOMIM Autosomal Dominant Intellectual Developmental Disorder Phenotypic Series) and epileptic encephalopathy (seeOMIM Epileptic Encephalopathy, Early Infantile Phenotypic Series) if compatible with walking should be included in the differential diagnosis.
To establish the extent of disease and needs in an individual diagnosed withSYNGAP1-related intellectual disability, the evaluations summarized inTable 2 (if not performed as part of the evaluation that led to diagnosis) are recommended.
Recommended Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis in Individuals withSYNGAP1-Related Intellectual Disability
System/Concern | Evaluation | Comment |
---|---|---|
Eyes | Ophthalmologic eval | Evidence of strabismus |
Gastrointestinal/ Feeding | Baseline eval for reflux &/or constipation; assessment for feeding problems | Refer to gastroenterologist &/or feeding therapist for treatment if indicated. |
Musculoskeletal | Assessment for hip rotation/dysplasia, kyphoscoliosis,pes planus | |
Neurologic | Neurologic eval | Incl EEG & brain MRI if seizures are suspected |
Psychiatric/ Behavioral | Neuropsychiatric eval | Screen persons age >12 mos for behavior concerns incl sleep disturbances, ADHD, anxiety, &/or traits suggestive of ASD. |
Miscellaneous/ Other | Developmental assessment | Incl motor, speech/language eval, general cognitive, & vocational skills. |
Consultation w/clinical geneticist &/or genetic counselor |
ADHD = attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; ASD = autism spectrum disorder
Treatment of Manifestations in Individuals withSYNGAP1-Related Intellectual Disability
Manifestation/Concern | Treatment | Considerations/Other |
---|---|---|
Strabismus | Standard treatment(s) as recommended by ophthalmologist | |
Swallowing dysfunction | Nasogastric/gastrostomy feeding may be required for persistent feeding issues. | |
Constipation | Standard treatment as recommended by gastroenterologist | Gastroenterology consultation, if severe |
Hip rotation/dysplasia, kyphoscoliosis, &pes planus | Standard treatment as recommended by orthopedist | Orthopedic consultation may be considered. |
Epilepsy | Standardized treatment w/ASMs by experienced neurologist |
|
ASMs = anti-seizure medications
Education of parents regarding common seizure presentations is appropriate. For information on non-medical interventions and coping strategies for parents or caregivers of children diagnosed with epilepsy, seeEpilepsy Foundation Toolbox.
The following information represents typical management recommendations for individuals with developmental delay / intellectual disability in the United States; standard recommendations may vary from country to country.
Ages 0-3 years. Referral to an early intervention program is recommended for access to occupational, physical, speech, and feeding therapy. In the US, early intervention is a federally funded program available in all states.
Ages 3-5 years. In the US, developmental preschool through the local public school district is recommended. Before placement, an evaluation is made to determine needed services and therapies and an individualized education plan (IEP) is developed.
Ages 5-21 years
All ages. Consultation with a developmental pediatrician is recommended to ensure the involvement of appropriate community, state, and educational agencies and to support parents in maximizing quality of life.
Consideration of private supportive therapies based on the affected individual's needs is recommended. Specific recommendations regarding type of therapy can be made by a developmental pediatrician.
In the US:
Gross motor dysfunction
Fine motor dysfunction. Occupational therapy is recommended for difficulty with fine motor skills that affect adaptive function such as feeding, grooming, dressing, and writing.
Oral motor dysfunction. Assuming that the individual is safe to eat by mouth, feeding therapy – typically from an occupational or speech therapist – is recommended for affected individuals who have difficulty feeding because of poor oral motor control.
Communication issues. Consider evaluation for alternative means of communication (e.g.,augmentative and alternative communication [AAC]) for individuals who have expressive language difficulties.
Children may qualify for and benefit from interventions used in treatment of autism spectrum disorder, including applied behavior analysis (ABA). ABA therapy is targeted to the individual child's behavioral, social, and adaptive strengths and weaknesses and is typically performed one on one with a board-certified behavior analyst.
Consultation with a developmental pediatrician may be helpful in guiding parents through appropriate behavior management strategies or providing prescription medications when necessary.
Concerns about serious aggressive or destructive behavior can be addressed by a pediatric psychiatrist.
Monitor those with seizures as clinically indicated.
Assess as needed for anxiety, attention, and aggressive or self-injurious behavior.
Monitor developmental progress and educational needs.
SeeGenetic Counseling for issues related to testing of at-risk relatives forgenetic counseling purposes.
SearchClinicalTrials.gov in the US andEU Clinical Trials Register in Europe for access to information on clinical studies for a wide range of diseases and conditions. Note: There may not be clinical trials for this disorder.
Genetic counseling is the process of providing individuals and families withinformation on the nature, mode(s) of inheritance, and implications of genetic disorders to help themmake informed medical and personal decisions. The following section deals with geneticrisk assessment and the use of family history and genetic testing to clarify geneticstatus for family members; it is not meant to address all personal, cultural, orethical issues that may arise or to substitute for consultation with a geneticsprofessional. —ED.
SYNGAP1-related intellectual disability (SYNGAP1-ID) is inherited in anautosomal dominant manner and is typically caused by ade novopathogenic variant.
Parents of aproband
Sibs of aproband
Offspring of aproband. Individuals withSYNGAP1-ID are not known to reproduce; the theoretic risk to offspring of mildly affected mosaic individuals [Berryer et al 2013] is up to 50%.
Other family members. Given that most probands withSYNGAP1-ID reported to date have the disorder as a result of ade novopathogenic variant, the risk to other family members is presumed to be low.
Family planning
Once theSYNGAP1pathogenic variant has been identified in an affected family member, prenatal andpreimplantation genetic testing are possible.
Differences in perspective may exist among medical professionals and within families regarding the use ofprenatal testing. While most centers would consider use of prenatal testing to be a personal decision, discussion of these issues may be helpful.
GeneReviews staff has selected the following disease-specific and/or umbrellasupport organizations and/or registries for the benefit of individuals with this disorderand their families. GeneReviews is not responsible for the information provided by otherorganizations. For information on selection criteria, clickhere.
Information in the Molecular Genetics and OMIM tables may differ from that elsewhere in the GeneReview: tables may contain more recent information. —ED.
SYNGAP1-Related Intellectual Disability: Genes and Databases
Gene | Chromosome Locus | Protein | Locus-Specific Databases | HGMD | ClinVar |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SYNGAP1 | 6p21 | Ras/Rap GTPase-activating protein SynGAP | SYNGAP1 database | SYNGAP1 | SYNGAP1 |
OMIM Entries for SYNGAP1-Related Intellectual Disability (View All in OMIM)
Gene structure. To date two NCBI reference sequences for humanSYNGAP1 have been reported:
Molecular genetic testing forSYNGAP1 pathogenic variants should include all 19 exons present in its largest reference sequence isoform (NM_006772.2).
By comparing human and rodentSYNGAP1 cDNAs,Mignot et al [2016] have recently identified potential additionalSYNGAP1isoforms that could arise from alternativesplicing.
Pathogenic variants. The majority of pathogenicSYNGAP1 variants are large deletions orheterozygousloss-of-function alleles such asnonsense and splice variants, frameshift insertions/deletions, andexon deletions; in addition, pathogenic heterozygousmissense variants have been reported in a few instances (see review byMignot et al [2016]). Most pathogenic variants occurde novo.
Normalgene product. The longestSYNGAP1 isoform (NM_006772.2) encodes a protein of 1,343 amino acids that contains pleckstrin homology (PH), C2, RASGAP, SH3-binding, and coiled-coiled domains. Isoform 2 (NM_001130066.1) encodes a protein of 1,292 amino acids that contains the same domains as isoform 1 but has a different C-terminus that includes a QTRV motif required for postsynaptic scaffold protein interaction.
Abnormalgene product.SYNGAP1-ID is caused byhaploinsufficiency of SYNGAP1. Pathogenic variants include those likely to result in complete loss of SYNGAP1 protein expression as well as those predicted to cause truncated or misfolded nonfunctional SYNGAP1.
GeneReviews® chapters are owned by the University of Washington. Permission ishereby granted to reproduce, distribute, and translate copies of content materials fornoncommercial research purposes only, provided that (i) credit for source (http://www.genereviews.org/) and copyright (© 1993-2025 University ofWashington) are included with each copy; (ii) a link to the original material is providedwhenever the material is published elsewhere on the Web; and (iii) reproducers,distributors, and/or translators comply with theGeneReviews® Copyright Notice and UsageDisclaimer. No further modifications are allowed. For clarity, excerptsof GeneReviews chapters for use in lab reports and clinic notes are a permitteduse.
For more information, see theGeneReviews® Copyright Notice and UsageDisclaimer.
For questions regarding permissions or whether a specified use is allowed,contact:ude.wu@tssamda.
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...