NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Adam MP, Feldman J, Mirzaa GM, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2025.
Simranpreet Kaur, MSc, M Phil andJohn Christodoulou, MBBS, PhD, FRACP, FFSc, FRCPA, FAHMS.
Author Information and AffiliationsInitial Posting:October 3, 2001; Last Update:September 19, 2019.
Estimated reading time: 37 minutes
The spectrum ofMECP2-related phenotypes in females ranges from classic Rett syndrome to variant Rett syndrome with a broader clinicalphenotype (either milder or more severe than classic Rett syndrome) to mild learning disabilities; the spectrum in males ranges from severe neonatal encephalopathy to pyramidal signs, parkinsonism, and macroorchidism (PPM-X) syndrome to severesyndromic/nonsyndromic intellectual disability.
The diagnosis of aMECP2 disorder is established bymolecular genetic testing in a femaleproband with suggestive findings and aheterozygousMECP2pathogenic variant, and in a male proband with suggestive findings and ahemizygousMECP2 pathogenic variant.
Treatment of manifestations: Treatment is mainly symptomatic and focuses on optimizing the individual's abilities using a multidisciplinary approach that should also include psychosocial support for family members. Risperidone may help in treating agitation; melatonin can ameliorate sleep disturbances. Treatment of seizures, constipation, gastroesophageal reflux, scoliosis, prolonged QTc, and spasticity per standard care.
Surveillance: Periodic evaluation by the multidisciplinary team; regular assessment of QTc for evidence of prolongation; regular assessment for scoliosis.
Agents/circumstances to avoid: Drugs known to prolong the QT interval.
MECP2 disorders are inherited in anX-linked manner. More than 99% aresimplex cases (i.e., a single occurrence in a family), resulting from ade novopathogenic variant or possibly from inheritance of the pathogenic variant from a parent who hasgermline mosaicism. Rarely, aMECP2 variant may be inherited from aheterozygous mother in whom favorable skewing ofX-chromosome inactivation results in minimal to no clinical findings. When the mother is a knownheterozygote, the risk to her offspring of inheriting theMECP2 variant is 50%. When the pathogenicMECP2 variant has been identified in the family, heterozygote testing for at-risk female relatives,prenatal testing for pregnancies at increased risk, andpreimplantation genetic testing are possible. Because of the possibility of parental germline mosaicism, it is appropriate to offerprenatal diagnosis to couples who have had a child with aMECP2 disorder regardless of whether theMECP2 pathogenic variant has been detected in a parent.
MECP2 Disorders: Included Phenotypes 1, 2 | |
---|---|
Females |
|
Males |
|
For other genetic causes of these phenotypes seeDifferential Diagnosis.
Note: The allelic disorderMECP2duplication syndrome is not included in thisGeneReview. SeeGenetically Related Disorders.
Note: Duplication ofMECP2 (ranging from 0.3 to 4 Mb and larger) is associated with the allelic disorderMECP2 duplication syndrome and is not addressed in thisGeneReview.
AMECP2 disordershould be suspected/considered in females with the following clinical findings suggestive ofMECP2 classic Rett syndrome or variant Rett syndrome (based on clinical diagnostic criteria published byNeul et al [2010] [full text] prior to the widespread availability ofmolecular genetic testing), or mild learning disabilities.
Clinical findings ofMECP2classic Rett syndrome and variant Rett syndrome
Clinical findings ofMECP2 mild learning disability. Typically mild and non-progressive. Note: Typically, females with mild learning disability are identified throughmolecular genetic testing following diagnosis of afirst-degree relative (e.g., a more significantly affected brother or sister).
MECP2 disorders should be considered in a male with severe neonatal encephalopathy; pyramidal signs, parkinsonism, and macroorchidism (PPM-X) syndrome; orsyndromic/nonsyndromic intellectual disability.
Clinical findings ofMECP2 severe neonatal encephalopathy
Clinical findings ofMECP2 severe intellectual disability (including PPM-X syndrome)
Femaleproband. The diagnosis of aMECP2 disorderis usually established in a female proband withsuggestive findings and aheterozygous pathogenic (orlikely pathogenic) variant inMECP2 identified bymolecular genetic testing (seeTable 1).
Maleproband. The diagnosis of aMECP2 disorderis established in a male proband withsuggestive findings and ahemizygous pathogenic (orlikely pathogenic) variant inMECP2 identified bymolecular genetic testing (seeTable 1).
Note: (1) Per ACMG/AMP variant interpretation guidelines, the terms "pathogenic variant" and "likely pathogenic variant" are synonymous in a clinical setting, meaning that both are considered diagnostic and can be used for clinical decision making [Richards et al 2015]. Reference to "pathogenic variants" in thisGeneReview is understood to include likely pathogenic variants. (2) Identification of ahemizygous orheterozygousMECP2 variant ofuncertain significance does not establish or rule out the diagnosis.
Molecular genetic testing approaches can include a combination ofgene-targeted testing (either single-gene,multigene panel) orcomprehensivegenomic testing (exome sequencing,exome array,genome sequencing) depending on thephenotype.
Gene-targeted testing requires that the clinician determine whichgene(s) are likely involved, whereasgenomic testing does not. Because thephenotype ofMECP2 disorders is broad, females with the distinctive findings described inSuggestive Findings are likely to be diagnosed using gene-targeted testing (seeOption 1), whereas females and males with a phenotype indistinguishable from many other inherited disorders with intellectual disability and/or neonatal encephalopathy are more likely to be diagnosed using genomic testing (seeOption 2).
When the clinical findings suggest the diagnosis of aMECP2 disorder,molecular genetic testing approaches can include use of single-gene testing or amultigene panel:
When thephenotype overlaps with many other inherited disorders characterized by intellectual disability and/or neonatal encephalopathy,comprehensivegenomic testing (which does not require the clinician to determine whichgene[s] are likely involved) is another option.Exome sequencing is most commonly used;genome sequencing is also possible.
Ifexome sequencing is not diagnostic,exome array (when clinically available) may be considered to detect (multi)exon deletions or duplications that cannot be detected bysequence analysis.
For an introduction to comprehensivegenomic testing clickhere. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genomic testing can be foundhere.
Molecular Genetic Testing Used inMECP2 Disorders
Gene 1 | Method | Proportion of Pathogenic Variants 2 Identified by Method |
---|---|---|
MECP2 | Sequence analysis 3 | 90%-95% 4 |
Gene-targeteddeletion/duplication analysis 5 | 5%-10% 6, 7 |
SeeTable A. Genes and Databases forchromosomelocus and protein.
SeeMolecular Genetics for information on variants detected in thisgene.
Sequence analysis detects variants that are benign,likely benign, ofuncertain significance,likely pathogenic, or pathogenic. Variants may includemissense,nonsense, andsplice site variants and small intragenic deletions/insertions; typically,exon or whole-gene deletions/duplications are not detected. For issues to consider in interpretation ofsequence analysis results, clickhere.
Gene-targeteddeletion/duplication analysis detects intragenic deletions or duplications. Methods used may include a range of techniques such asquantitative PCR, long-range PCR, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), and agene-targeted microarray designed to detect single-exon deletions or duplications. Gene-targeted deletion/duplication testing will detect deletions ranging from a single exon to the whole gene; however, breakpoints of large deletions and/or deletion of adjacent genes (e.g., those described byHardwick et al [2007]) may not be detected by these methods.
The sizes of many reported disease-associated deletions are at the upper limits of detection bysequence analysis and the lower limits of detection bygene-targeteddeletion/duplication analysis; therefore, the proportion of pathogenic variants detected by either method depends on the methods used by a laboratory.
In females the spectrum ofMECP2-related phenotypes ranges from classic Rett syndrome, to variant Rett syndrome (either milder or more severe than classic Rett syndrome), to mild learning disabilities. In males the spectrum ranges from severe neonatal encephalopathy, to pyramidal signs, parkinsonism, and macroorchidism (PPM-X) syndrome, to severesyndromic/nonsyndromic intellectual disability.
Features of MECP2 Disorders in Females
Phenotype | Feature | % of Persons w/Feature |
---|---|---|
MECP2 classic Rett syndrome | Regression followed by recovery or stabilization | 99% |
Deceleration of head growth | 80% | |
Gait abnormalities | 99% | |
Seizures | 60%-80% | |
Hand stereotypies & loss of purposeful hand skills | 100% 1 | |
Absence of speech; high-pitched crying | 99% | |
Cold extremities | 99% | |
Irregular breathing | 99% | |
Variant Rett syndrome | Regression followed by recovery or stabilization | 99% |
Gait abnormalities | 80%-99% | |
Sleep disturbences | 80%-99% | |
Seizures | 6%-80% | |
Hand stereotypies & loss of purposeful hand skills | 97.3% | |
Breathing irregularities | 80%-99% | |
Agitation | 80%-99% |
Stallworth et al [2019]; 44% showed different patterns including hand wringing, washing, clapping, and tapping.
MECP2 classic Rett syndrome. Most individuals with classic Rett syndrome are female; however, males meeting the clinical criteria for classic Rett syndrome who have a 47,XXYkaryotype [Hoffbuhr et al 2001,Leonard et al 2001,Schwartzman et al 2001] andpostzygoticMECP2 variants resulting insomatic mosaicism have been described [Clayton-Smith et al 2000,Topçu et al 2002].
Although early development is reportedly normal in children with classic Rett syndrome, parents – in retrospect – often identify subtle differences compared to unaffected sibs. Most (but not all) affected children have acquired microcephaly; stereotypic hand movements and breathing irregularities are seen in the majority.
Variant Rett syndrome. Females with variant Rett syndrome exhibit a broader spectrum of clinical features than those observed in classic Rett syndrome. At the more severe end of the spectrum, development is delayed from very early infancy;congenital hypotonia and infantile spasms are also seen. At the milder end of the spectrum, regression is less dramatic and intellectual disability is much less severe; some speech may be preserved.
Mild learning disabilities. In rare instances, females with a pathogenicMECP2 variant may only exhibit mild learning disabilities or some autistic features, presumably as a consequence of favorable skewing ofX-chromosome inactivation. When there is no regression phase and no characteristic hand stereotypes, the clinical course differs from that of classic and variant Rett syndrome.
Features ofMECP2 Disorders in Males
Phenotype | Feature | % of Persons w/Feature | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Present | Absent | Not reported | ||
MECP2-related severe neonatal encephalopathy 1 | Normal birth parameters | 71% | 29% | |
Head growth deceleration / microcephaly | 94% | 5.8% | ||
Hypotonia &/or feeding difficulties in infancy | 82.4% | 17.6% | ||
Hypertonia of extremities | 52.9% | 11.8% | 35.3% | |
Movement disorder, e.g., myoclonus, tremors, & dystonia | 58.8% | 17.7% | 23.5% | |
Mild cerebral atrophy | 18% | 35% | 47% | |
Polymicrogyria | 5.9% | 23.5% | 70.6% | |
Poor head control | 35% | 12% | 53% | |
Seizures | 58.8% | 17.7% | 23.5% | |
Severe development delay | 82.4% | 17.6% | ||
Irregular breathing / sleep apnea | 47.1% | 29.4% | 23.5% | |
Gastroesophageal reflux | 35.3% | 64.7% | ||
EEG abnormality | 88.2% | 5.9% | 5.9% | |
Pyramidal signs, parkinsonism, & macroorchidism (PPM-X syndrome) 2 | Psychosis | 67.6% | 10.8% | 21.6% |
Pyramidal signs | 46% | 2.7% | 51.3% | |
Macroorchidism | 19% | 81% | ||
Intellectual disability | 50% | 50% | ||
Parkinsonism | 2.7% | 97.3% | ||
Progressive spasticity | 67.6% | 32.4% | ||
Delayed development | 54% | 46% | ||
Speech difficulties | 50% | 50% | ||
Seizures | 2.7% | |||
Bilateral juvenile cataract | 2.7% | |||
Scoliosis or kyphosis | 10.8% | |||
Large ears | 8.1% | |||
Movement disorders | 32.4% | |||
Apraxia | 2.7% | 36% | ||
Seizures | 8.1% | 91.9% | ||
Dysmorphic features | 5.4% | 94.6% | ||
Syndromic/ nonsyndromic intellectual disability 3 | Severe intellectual disability | 90% | 10% | |
Gait abnormalities | 57% | 7% | 36% | |
Facial dysmorphism | 10% | 3% | 87% | |
Behavioral problems | 40% | 3% | 57% | |
Autistic-like behavior | 3% | 53% | 44% | |
Seizures | 20% | 30% | 50% | |
Poor/absent language skills | 47% | 17% | 36% | |
Hypotonia | 23% | 77% | ||
Microcephaly | 13% | 23% | 64% | |
History of regression | 17% | 27% | 56% | |
Spasticity | 33% | 17% | 50% | |
Sleep disturbances | 13% | 10% | 77% |
Severe neonatal-onset encephalopathy is characterized by a relentless clinical course that follows a metabolic-degenerative type of pattern, abnormal tone, involuntary movements, severe seizures, and breathing abnormalities (including central hypoventilation or respiratory insufficiency) [Wan et al 1999,Villard et al 2000,Zeev et al 2002,Kankirawatana et al 2006]. Often, males with a severe neonatal encephalopathy die before age two years [Schanen et al 1998,Wan et al 1999].
The severe encephalopathyphenotype appears to be rare in females [Lugtenberg et al 2009].
X-linked ID and PPM-X syndrome. PPM-X syndrome, caused by thep.(Ala140Val)MECP2 variant in males, is characterized by moderate-to-severe intellectual disability. Most have spasticity that may be progressive; some may have extrapyramidal movements. Episodic psychosis is seen in many but not all. Most affected males also have macroorchidism. Microcephaly is variable. See alsoGenotype-Phenotype Correlations.
Genotype-phenotype correlations are inconsistent, due in part to the pattern ofX-chromosome inactivation (XCI); females who have aMECP2pathogenic variant and favorably skewed XCI may have mild or no manifestations [Wan et al 1999,Amir et al 2000,Cheadle et al 2000,Huppke et al 2000,Weaving et al 2003,Chae et al 2004,Schanen et al 2004,Charman et al 2005].
MECP2 pathogenic variants with some residual function that are associated with milder phenotypes include the following:
The worldwide prevalence is 1:10,000-1:23,000 female births [Ellaway et al 1999,Armstrong et al 2010]. Reports of incidence are limited; available estimates range from 0.43-0.71:10,000 for females in France [Bienvenu et al 2006] to 0.586:10,000 for females in Serbia [Sarajlija et al 2015] and 1.09:10,000 for females in Australia [Laurvick et al 2006].
MECP2 duplication syndrome is characterized in affected males by infantile hypotonia, delayed psychomotor development leading to severe intellectual disability, poor speech development, progressive spasticity, recurrent respiratory infections, and seizures.
Duplications ofMECP2 ranging from 0.3 to 4 Mb and larger are found in all affected males.
The birth prevalence ofMECP2duplication syndrome has been reported to be 0.65:100,000 for all live births and 1:100,000 for males in Australia with the median age at diagnosis of 23.5 months [Giudice-Nairn et al 2019].
Disorders to Consider in the Differential Diagnosis ofMECP2 Disorders
DiffDx Disorder | Gene(s) / Genetic Mechanism | MOI | Clinical Features of DiffDx Disorder | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Overlapping w/MECP2 Disorders | Distinguishing fromMECP2 Disorders | |||
Angelman syndrome | Deficient expression or function of maternally inheritedUBE3Aallele | See footnote 1. | ID, severe speech impairment, gait ataxia &/or tremulousness of the limbs; microcephaly & seizures common; DD 1st noted at age ~6 mos | In classic Rett syndrome DD is not overtly evident in the 1st 6 mos. |
Early infantile epileptic encephalopathy (SeeCDKL5 Deficiency Disorder.) | CDKL5 | XL | In females: early-onset severe seizures w/poor cognitive development; facial gestalt, cortical visual impairment; In males: severe-profound ID & early-onset intractable seizures 2 | Very early-onset seizures, facial dysmorphism, & cortical visual impairment are not generally seen in classic Rett syndrome. |
Rett syndrome,congenital variant (SeeFOXG1 Syndrome.) | FOXG1 | AD | Short normal period of development before onset of regression leading to severe ID, DD, postnatal microcephaly, agenesis of the corpus callosum, seizures, dyskinesia, & hypotonia 3 | Except for microcephaly, structural abnormalities are not usually seen on brain MRI. |
AD =autosomal dominant; DD = developmental delay; DiffDx = differential diagnosis; ID = intellectual disability; MOI =mode of inheritance; XL =X-linked
The risk to sibs of aproband depends on the genetic mechanism leading to the loss ofUBE3A function: typically less than 1% risk for probands with adeletion oruniparental disomy (UPD), and as high as 50% for probands with animprinting defect or apathogenic variant ofUBE3A.
Overlapping features and a similar facial appearance between individuals withFOXG1 pathogenic variants has led to the suggestion that these individuals should be regarded as havingFOXG1 syndrome rather than a variant of Rett syndrome [Kortüm et al 2011].
To establish the extent of disease and needs in an individual diagnosed with aMECP2 disorder, the evaluations summarized inTable 5 (if not performed as part of the evaluation that led to the diagnosis) are recommended.
Recommended Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis in Individuals with aMECP2 Disorder
System/Concern | Evaluation | Comment |
---|---|---|
Constitutional | Measurement of height, weight, & head circumference | |
Neurologic | Neurologic eval | To incl brain MRI; consider EEG / video monitoring if seizures are a concern. |
Development | Developmental assessment |
|
Psychiatric/ Behavioral | Neuropsychiatric eval | In persons age >12 mos: screening for problems incl sleep disturbances, ADHD, anxiety, &/or findings suggestive of ASD |
Musculoskeletal | Orthopedics, physical medicine & rehab, PT/OT eval | To incl assessment of:
|
Gastrointestinal/ Feeding | Gastroenterology / nutrition / feeding team eval | To incl:
|
Respiratory | Overnight sleep studies |
|
Sleep disorder | Breathing monitoring using portable polygraphic screening devices | To assess occurrence of apnea & hypopnea |
Cardiovascular | Cardiac eval | To assess for prolonged QTc |
Osteopenia | Bone densitometry | To assess for osteopenia |
Eyes | Ophthalmologic eval | To assess for ↓ vision, abnormal ocular movement, strabismus |
Hearing | Audiology eval | Assess for hearing loss |
ENT/Mouth | ||
Genitourinary | ||
Integument | History & exam | ↓ perfusion of hands & feet (possible autonomic abnormalities) |
Miscellaneous/ Other | Consultation w/clinical geneticist &/or genetic counselor | To inclgenetic counseling |
Family supports/ resources | Assess need for:
|
ADHD = attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; ASD = autism spectrum disorder; GERD = gastroesophageal reflux disease; OT = occupational therapy; PT = physical therapy
Treatment needs to be individualized following an assessment of the affected individual's clinical problems and needs.
Management is symptomatic and focuses on optimizing the individual's abilities using a multidisciplinary approach with input from a pediatric or adult specialist physician, dietician, occupational therapist, speech therapist, music therapist, dentist, and other medical subspecialists as needed.
Treatment of Manifestations in Individuals with aMECP2 Disorder
Manifestation/ Concern | Treatment | Considerations/Other |
---|---|---|
DD/ID | SeeDevelopmental Delay / Intellectual Disability Management Issues. | |
Epilepsy | Standardized treatment w/ASM by an experienced neurologist |
|
Psychiatric/ Behavioral | Risperidone (low dose) or selective serotonin uptake inhibitors have been somewhat successful in treating agitation. | |
Musculoskeletal | Scoliosis | Per guidelines 2 |
Poor weight gain / Failure to thrive | Feeding therapy; gastrostomy tube placement may be required for persistent feeding issues. | Low threshold for clinical feeding eval &/or radiographic swallowing study when showing clinical signs or symptoms of dysphagia; nutritional guidelines are available. 3 |
Spasticity | Orthopedics / physical medicine & rehab / PT & OT incl stretching to help avoid contractures & falls | Consider need for positioning & mobility devices, disability parking placard. |
Sleep disorder | Melatonin can ameliorate sleep disturbances. | Chloral hydrate, hydroxyzine, or diphenhydramine may be used w/melatonin. |
Abnormal vision &/or strabismus | Standard treatment(s) as recommended by ophthalmologist | Community vision services through early intervention or school district |
Central visual impairment | No specific treatment; early intervention to help stimulate visual development | |
Hearing | Hearing aids may be helpful; per otolaryngologist | Community hearing services through early intervention or school district |
Gastrointestinal |
| |
Cardiovascular | Treatment for prolonged QTc | Under care of pediatric cardiologist |
Osteopenia | Baseline densitometry; optimization of physical activity & calcium & vitamin D levels | Guidelines for management of bone health are available. 4 |
Family/ Community |
|
|
ASM = anti-seizure medication; DD = developmental delay; GERD = gastroesophageal reflux disease; ID = intellectual disability; OT = occupational therapy; PT = physical therapy
Education of parents/caregivers regarding common seizure presentations is appropriate. For information on non-medical interventions and coping strategies for children diagnosed with epilepsy, seeEpilepsy Foundation Toolbox.
The following information represents typical management recommendations for individuals with developmental delay / intellectual disability in the United States; standard recommendations may vary from country to country.
Ages 0-3 years. Referral to an early intervention program is recommended for access to occupational, physical, speech, and feeding therapy as well as infant mental health services, special educators, and sensory impairment specialists. In the US, early intervention is a federally funded program available in all states that provides in-home services to target individual therapy needs.
Ages 3-5 years. In the US, developmental preschool through the local public school district is recommended. Before placement, an evaluation is made to determine needed services and therapies and an individualized education plan (IEP) is developed for those who qualify based on established motor, language, social, or cognitive delay. The early intervention program typically assists with this transition. Developmental preschool is center based; for children too medically unstable to attend, home-based services are provided.
All ages. Consultation with a developmental pediatrician is recommended to ensure the involvement of appropriate community, state, and educational agencies and to support parents in maximizing quality of life. Some issues to consider:
Gross motor dysfunction
Fine motor dysfunction. Occupational therapy is recommended for difficulty with fine motor skills that affect adaptive function such as feeding, grooming, dressing, and writing.
Oral motor dysfunction should be assessed at each visit and clinical feeding evaluations and/or radiographic swallowing studies should be obtained for choking/gagging during feeds, poor weight gain, frequent respiratory illnesses, or feeding refusal that is not otherwise explained. Assuming that the child is safe to eat by mouth, feeding therapy (typically by an occupational or speech therapist) is recommended to improve coordination or sensory-related feeding issues. Feeds can be thickened or chilled for safety. When feeding dysfunction is severe, an NG-tube or G-tube may be necessary.
Communication issues. Consider evaluation for alternative means of communication (e.g.,augmentative and alternative communication [AAC]) for individuals who have expressive language difficulties. An AAC evaluation can be completed by a speech-language pathologist who has expertise in the area. The evaluation will consider cognitive abilities and sensory impairments to determine the most appropriate form of communication. AAC devices can range from low-tech, such as picture exchange communication, to high-tech, such as voice-generating devices. Contrary to popular belief, AAC devices do not hinder verbal development of speech, but rather support optimal speech and language development.
Children may qualify for and benefit from interventions used in treatment of autism spectrum disorder, including applied behavior analysis (ABA). ABA therapy is targeted to the individual child's behavioral, social, and adaptive strengths and weaknesses and typically performed one on one with a board-certified behavior analyst.
Consultation with a developmental pediatrician may be helpful in guiding parents through appropriate behavior management strategies or providing prescription medications, such as medication used to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, when necessary.
Concerns about serious aggressive or destructive behavior can be addressed by a pediatric psychiatrist.
Many of the clinical features in females with atypical Rett syndrome (Table 2) evolve with age and hence should be reassessed every six to 12 months.
Recommended Surveillance for Individuals with aMECP2 Disorder
System/Concern | Evaluation | Frequency |
---|---|---|
Feeding |
| At each multidisciplinary clinic visit; at least annually |
Gastrointestinal | Monitor for constipation. | |
Respiratory | Monitor for evidence of aspiration, respiratory insufficiency. | |
Neurologic |
| |
Development | Monitor developmental progress & educational needs. | |
Speech & language | Monitor communication skills. | |
Psychiatric/ Behavioral | Behavioral assessment for anxiety, attention, & aggressive or self-injurious behavior | |
Musculoskeletal |
| |
Cardiovascular | Monitor for prolonged QTc. | |
Respiratory | Apnea/hyperventilation | |
Miscellaneous/ Other | Assess family need for social work support (e.g., palliative/respite care, home nursing; other local resources) & care coordination. |
OT = occupational therapy; PT = physical therapy
Because individuals withMECP2 disorders are at increased risk for life-threatening arrhythmias associated with a prolonged QT interval, avoidance of drugs known to prolong the QT interval, including the following, is recommended:
SeeCredibleMeds® (free registration required) for a more extensive list of drugs to avoid.
SeeGenetic Counseling for issues related to testing of at-risk relatives forgenetic counseling purposes.
A number of clinical trials are currently under way, including observational studies, studies focused on improvement of language and communication skills, and drug trials.
For details seewww.rettsyndrome.org.
SearchClinicalTrials.gov in the US andEU Clinical Trials Register in Europe for access to information on clinical studies for a wide range of diseases and conditions.
Genetic counseling is the process of providing individuals and families withinformation on the nature, mode(s) of inheritance, and implications of genetic disorders to help themmake informed medical and personal decisions. The following section deals with geneticrisk assessment and the use of family history and genetic testing to clarify geneticstatus for family members; it is not meant to address all personal, cultural, orethical issues that may arise or to substitute for consultation with a geneticsprofessional. —ED.
MECP2 disorders are inherited in anX-linked manner.
Parents of aproband
Sibs of aproband. The risk to sibs depends on the genetic status of the parents:
Offspring of aproband
Other family members. The risk to other family members depends on the genetic status of theproband's mother: if the mother is affected or has a pathogenicMECP2 variant, her family members may be at risk.
First-degree female relatives. Once the pathogenicMECP2 variant has been identified in aproband, it is appropriate to offer testing to all first-degree female relatives regardless of their clinical status. Apparently unaffected sisters of a female proband with aMECP2 disorder may beheterozygous for theMECP2 variant present in their sister but have few to no manifestations because of skewedX-chromosome inactivation. Genetic counseling should address this possibility as clinically unaffected sisters may be at risk of transmitting the pathogenicMECP2 variant to their children.
Family planning
DNA banking. Because it is likely that testing methodology and our understanding of genes, pathogenic mechanisms, and diseases will improve in the future, consideration should be given to banking DNA from probands in whom a molecular diagnosis has not been confirmed (i.e., the causative pathogenic mechanism is unknown). For more information, seeHuang et al [2022].
Once theMECP2pathogenic variant has been identified in an affected family member, prenatal andpreimplantation genetic testing are possible. Males with aMECP2 variant who survive infancy will most likely have severe intellectual disability. Thephenotype in a female with aMECP2 variant is difficult to predict and can range from apparently normal to severely affected.
Note: Because parentalgermline mosaicism for aMECP2pathogenic variant has been reported in multiple families, it is appropriate to offerprenatal testing to the parents of a child with aMECP2 disorder whether or not theMECP2 pathogenic variant has been identified in the leukocyte DNA of either parent.
GeneReviews staff has selected the following disease-specific and/or umbrellasupport organizations and/or registries for the benefit of individuals with this disorderand their families. GeneReviews is not responsible for the information provided by otherorganizations. For information on selection criteria, clickhere.
Information in the Molecular Genetics and OMIM tables may differ from that elsewhere in the GeneReview: tables may contain more recent information. —ED.
MECP2 Disorders: Genes and Databases
Gene | Chromosome Locus | Protein | Locus-Specific Databases | HGMD | ClinVar |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MECP2 | Xq28 | Methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 | MECP2 @ LOVD CCHMC - Human Genetics Mutation Database (MECP2) RettBASE | MECP2 | MECP2 |
OMIM Entries for MECP2 Disorders (View All in OMIM)
Loss of the protein MeCP2 leads toepigenetic aberrations of chromatin, suggesting that MeCP2 deficiency could lead to loss ofimprinting, thereby contributing to the pathogenesis of Rett syndrome [Horike et al 2005,Kaufmann et al 2005,Makedonski et al 2005].
The nuclear MeCP2 protein functional domains include:
It has also been shown that MeCP2 plays a role ingenesplicing [Young et al 2005] and in long-range chromatin remodeling [Horike et al 2005], and may be a transcriptional activator [Chahrour et al 2008].
Mechanism of disease causation. Most pathogenicMECP2 variants occurde novo. It has been suggested that pathogenic variants result in loss of protein function; some functional studies show that pathogenicMECP2 variants affect the MBD or TRD domains of the abnormal protein, depending on the location of the variant [Kudo et al 2001,Kudo et al 2002,Kudo et al 2003].
MECP2-specific laboratory technical considerations. Two transcripts have been described:
Although theisoforms are nearly identical, use of two alternative start codons creates alternative N-termini. The e1 transcript is much more highly expressed in brain than the e2 transcript [Kriaucionis & Bird 2004,Mnatzakanian et al 2004].Of note:
The majority of pathogenic variants occur in the region encoding the methyl bindingdomain (MBD, exons 3 and 4; amino acids 90-174 of the MeCP2 e2 isoform), affecting the ability of the MeCP2 protein to bind to target DNA. A number of highly recurrentnonsense variants are found in the transcriptional repression domain (TRD,exon 4; amino acids 219-322 of the MeCP2 e2 isoform) and beyond the TRD, a large number of frameshift variants delete the C-terminal end of the protein (3' end of exon 4).
NotableMECP2 Pathogenic Variants
Reference Sequences | DNA Nucleotide Change | Predicted Protein Change | Comment [Reference] |
---|---|---|---|
NM_004492 NP_004983 | c.473C>T | p.Thr158Met | Common, recurrent pathogenic variants [Miltenberger-Miltenyi & Laccone 2003,Archer et al 2006,Philippe et al 2006] |
c.502C>T | p.Arg168Ter | ||
c.763C>T | p.Arg255Ter | ||
c.808C>T | p.Arg270Ter | ||
c.916C>T | p.Arg306Cys | ||
c.397C>T | p.Arg133Cys | Milderphenotype in females is consistent w/in vitro functional studies showing that DNA binding is not impaired [Leonard et al 2003,Sheikh et al 2016]. | |
c.419C>T | p.Ala140Val | Nonclassic, variant Rett syndrome, observed infamilial cases w/affected males [Dotti et al 2002,Klauck et al 2002,Gomot et al 2003,Venkateswaran et al 2014,Lambert et al 2016,Sheikh et al 2016];heterozygous females may have mild ID & impaired speech acquistion [Klauck et al 2002,Lambert et al 2016]. | |
c.925C>T | p.Arg309Trp | Observed in females & males w/ID & some features of aMECP2 disorder, but not classic or variant Rett syndrome [Campos et al 2007,Schönewolf-Greulich et al 2016] |
ID = intellectual disability
Variants listed in the table have been provided by the authors.GeneReviews staff have not independently verified the classification of variants.
GeneReviews follows the standard naming conventions of the Human Genome Variation Society (varnomen
Vicky L Brandt; Baylor College of Medicine (2000-2004)
John Christodoulou, MBBS, PhD, FRACP, FRCPA, FHGSA (2006-present)
Gladys Ho, MSc; Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney (2009-2019)
Simranpreet Kaur, MSci, MPhil (2019-present)
Huda Y Zoghbi, MD; Baylor College of Medicine (2004-2006)
GeneReviews® chapters are owned by the University of Washington. Permission ishereby granted to reproduce, distribute, and translate copies of content materials fornoncommercial research purposes only, provided that (i) credit for source (http://www.genereviews.org/) and copyright (© 1993-2025 University ofWashington) are included with each copy; (ii) a link to the original material is providedwhenever the material is published elsewhere on the Web; and (iii) reproducers,distributors, and/or translators comply with theGeneReviews® Copyright Notice and UsageDisclaimer. No further modifications are allowed. For clarity, excerptsof GeneReviews chapters for use in lab reports and clinic notes are a permitteduse.
For more information, see theGeneReviews® Copyright Notice and UsageDisclaimer.
For questions regarding permissions or whether a specified use is allowed,contact:ude.wu@tssamda.
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...