NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Adam MP, Bick S, Mirzaa GM, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2026.
Nicole I Wolf, MD, PhD,Rosalina ML van Spaendonk, PhD, andGrace M Hobson, PhD.
Author Information and AffiliationsInitial Posting:June 15, 1999; Last Update:June 12, 2025.
Estimated reading time: 39 minutes
PLP1-related disorders of central nervous system myelin formation include a range of phenotypes from Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease (PMD) to spastic paraplegia 2 (SPG2). PMD typically manifests in infancy or early childhood with nystagmus, hypotonia, and cognitive impairment; the findings progress to severe spasticity and ataxia. Life span is shortened. SPG2 manifests as spastic paraparesis with or without CNS involvement and usually normal life span. Intrafamilial variation of phenotypes can be observed, but the clinical manifestations are usually fairly consistent within families. Heterozygous females may manifest mild-to-moderate features of the disease.
The diagnosis of aPLP1-related disorder is established in a maleproband by identification of ahemizygouspathogenic variant involvingPLP1. The diagnosis of aPLP1-related disorder is usually established in a female with neurologic signs, a family history of aPLP1-related disorder, and aheterozygous pathogenic variant inPLP1 identified bymolecular genetic testing.
Treatment of manifestations: A multidisciplinary team comprising specialists in neurology, physical medicine, orthopedics, pulmonary medicine, and gastroenterology is optimal for care. Treatment may include respiratory support as needed; gastrostomy for individuals with severe dysphagia; routine management of spasticity including physical therapy, exercise, medications (baclofen, diazepam, tizanidine), orthotics, and surgery for joint contractures; anti-seizure medication for seizures; developmental, educational, and neurobehavioral support; physical and occupational therapy for ataxia with adaptive devices as needed; individuals with scoliosis benefit from proper wheelchair seating and physical therapy; surgery may be required for severe scoliosis; management of ocular manifestations as per ophthalmology; management of spastic urinary bladder as per urology; treatment of osteopenia as per endocrinologist.
Surveillance: Growth, nutrition, and feeding assessment at each visit; neurologic evaluation for weakness, hypotonia, spasticity, ataxia, and ambulation every six to 12 months; EEG as needed; developmental and educational assessment every six to 12 months in children and adolescents; cognitive assessment every six to 12 months in older individuals; orthopedic assessment of scoliosis, contractures, presence of joint dislocations, and physical medicine, occupational and physical therapy assessment of mobility and self-help skills every six to 12 months; assess for low bone density as needed; ophthalmologic evaluation to assess for nystagmus and visual impairment as recommended by ophthalmology; assess for urinary dysfunction as recommended by urology; assess family and social work needs.
Agents/circumstances to avoid: Elevated body temperature, as with fever, may cause neurologic manifestations to transiently worsen.
PLP1-related disorders are inherited in anX-linked manner.De novo pathogenic variants have been reported. The risk to sibs of a maleproband depends on the genetic status of the mother: if the mother of the proband has aPLP1pathogenic variant, the chance of transmitting the pathogenic variant in each pregnancy is 50%. Males who inherit the pathogenic variant will be affected; females who inherit the pathogenic variant may be asymptomatic or manifest mild-to-moderate signs of the disorder. Heterozygous female sibs are more likely to develop neurologic signs if thephenotype in affected males is relatively mild. Once thePLP1 pathogenic variant has been identified in an affected family member,heterozygote detection and prenatal andpreimplantation genetic testing are possible.
| PLP1-Related Disorders: Included Phenotypes1 |
|---|
|
For synonyms and outdated names seeNomenclature.
For other genetic causes of these phenotypes, seeDifferential Diagnosis.
For the purposes of thisGeneReview, the terms "male" and "female" are narrowly defined as the individual's biological sex at birth as it determines clinical care [Caughey et al 2021].
No consensus clinical diagnostic criteria forPLP1-related disorders have been published.
APLP1-related disordershould be suspected in probands with the following clinical, imaging, and family history findings.
Suggestive clinical findings include:
Brain MRI findings byphenotype (T2-weighted or fluid-attenuated inversion recovery [FLAIR] scans):
Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) may show reduced white matter N-acetyl aspartate (NAA) levels, especially in individuals withPLP1null syndrome [Bonavita et al 2001,Garbern & Hobson 2002,Plecko et al 2003]. In contrast, individuals withPLP1 duplications may have increased white matter NAA levels although there are no systematic studies.
Family history is consistent withX-linked inheritance (e.g., no male-to-male transmission). Absence of a known family history does not preclude the diagnosis.
Maleproband. The diagnosis of aPLP1-related disorderis established in a male proband by identification of ahemizygous pathogenic (orlikely pathogenic) variant inPLP1 bymolecular genetic testing (seeTable 1).
Femaleproband. The diagnosis of aPLP1-related disorderis usually established in a female proband with neurologic signs, a family history ofPLP1-related disorder, and aheterozygous pathogenic (orlikely pathogenic) variant inPLP1 identified bymolecular genetic testing (seeTable 1).
Note: (1) Per ACMG/AMP variant interpretation guidelines, the terms "pathogenic variant" and "likely pathogenic variant" are synonymous in a clinical setting, meaning that both are considered diagnostic and can be used for clinical decision making [Richards et al 2015]. Reference to "pathogenic variants" in thisGeneReview is understood to include likely pathogenic variants. (2) Identification of ahemizygous/heterozygousPLP1 variant ofuncertain significance does not establish or rule out the diagnosis.
Molecular genetic testing approaches can include a combination ofgene-targeted testing (single gene testing,multigene panel) andcomprehensivegenomic testing (exome sequencing,genome sequencing). Gene-targeted testing requires that the clinician determine which gene(s) are likely involved (see Option 1), whereas comprehensive genomic testing does not (see Option 2).
When the phenotypic and laboratory findings suggest the diagnosis of aPLP1-related disorder,molecular genetic testing approaches can includetargeteddeletion/duplication analysis,single-gene testing, or use of amultigene panel:
When thephenotype is indistinguishable from many other inherited disorders characterized by motor and cognitive impairment,comprehensivegenomic testing does not require the clinician to determine whichgene is likely involved.Exome sequencing is most commonly used;genome sequencing is also possible.
For an introduction to comprehensivegenomic testing clickhere. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genomic testing can be foundhere.
Molecular Genetic Testing Used inPLP1-Related Disorders
| Gene1 | Method | Proportion of Pathogenic Variants2 Identified by Method |
|---|---|---|
| PLP1 | Gene-targeteddeletion/duplication analysis3 | 60%-70%4, 5, 6 |
| Sequence analysis7 | 30%-40% | |
| See footnote 8. | <1% |
SeeTable A. Genes and Databases forchromosomelocus and protein.
SeeMolecular Genetics for information on variants detected in thisgene.
Gene-targeteddeletion/duplication analysis detects intragenic deletions or duplications. Methods used may include a range of techniques such asquantitative PCR, long-range PCR, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), and agene-targeted microarray designed to detect single-exon deletions or duplications. Exome andgenome sequencing may be able to detect deletions/duplications using breakpoint detection or read depth; however,sensitivity can be lower than gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis.
The majority ofgene dosage changes are tandem duplications occurring in Xq22, which include all ofPLP1. In rare instances, the duplicated region can be inserted at some distance from Xq22; four insertions have been reported: at Xp22, Xq28 [Woodward et al 1998,Hodes et al 2000], and 19qtel [Inoue et al 2002]; and in the Ychromosome [Woodward et al 2005]. Complex rearrangements are relatively frequent [Bahrambeigi et al 2019]. Triplication, partial triplication, and quintuplication ofPLP1 also occur [Boespflug-Tanguy et al 1994,Woodward et al 1998,Wolf et al 2005,Combes et al 2006]. Insimplex females,PLP1duplication often occurs with complex chromosomal rearrangements.
Whole-gene deletions ofPLP1 occur in fewer than 2% of those with the Pelizaeus-Merzbacher diseasephenotype [Raskind et al 1991;Boespflug-Tanguy et al 1994;Inoue et al 2002].Inoue et al [2002] determined that the individual originally described with aPLP1deletion has a complex rearrangement with both a deletion ofPLP1 and an invertedinsertion of a more distal portion of the Xchromosome at the deletion junction. In addition, this individual hasduplication of a region distal ofPLP1 [Hobson et al 2002,Lee et al 2007]. PartialPLP1 deletion has also been reported [Combes et al 2006].
Depending on the method used, largerdeletion orduplication events may be detected. Position effect of a duplication identified byFISH that was near but did not includePLP1 has been invoked as the cause of the neurologic syndrome in a man with spastic paraplegia [Lee et al 2006]. Likewise, a microdeletion containing distalPLP1 enhancers was identified as the likely cause of spastic paraplegia in another family [Zhou et al 2023].
Sequence analysis which should include analysis ofintron 3B detects variants that are benign,likely benign, ofuncertain significance,likely pathogenic, or pathogenic. Variants may includemissense,nonsense, andsplice site variants and small intragenic deletions/insertions; typically,exon or whole-gene deletions/duplications are not detected. For issues to consider in interpretation ofsequence analysis results, clickhere.
An inversion of the Xchromosome with a breakpoint 70 kb upstream ofPLP1, identified by chromosome analysis, was proposed to disruptPLP1 expression through position effect in a child with PMD-like syndrome [Muncke et al 2004].
Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease (PMD) andX-linked spastic paraplegia 2 (SPG2) are at opposite ends of a clinical spectrum of disease caused by pathogenic variants inPLP1, which results in defective central nervous system (CNS) myelination. PMD and SPG2 have been observed in different males within the same family [Hodes et al 1993,Sistermans et al 1998].
Boulloche & Aicardi [1986],Hodes et al [1993],Cailloux et al [2000] andDuan et al [2022] have summarized the clinical features of their series of individuals with PMD. The phenotypes in this spectrum cannot be neatly categorized into distinct syndromes but are summarized using designations frequently encountered in the medical literature (seeTable 2).
Spectrum ofPLP1-Related Disorders
| Phenotype | Age of Onset | Neurologic Findings | Ambulation | Speech | Age at Death |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Severe "connatal" PMD | Neonatal period | Nystagmus at birth; pharyngeal weakness; stridor; hypotonia; severe spasticity; ± seizures; cognitive impairment | Never achieved | Absent, but nonverbal communication & speech comprehension possible | Infancy to 3rd decade |
| Classic PMD | 1st 5 yrs | Nystagmus in 1st 2 mos; initial hypotonia; spastic quadriparesis; ataxia titubation; ± dystonia, athetosis; cognitive impairment | W/assistance if achieved; lost in childhood/ adolescence | Usually present | 3rd-7th decade |
| PLP1null syndrome | 1st 5 yrs | No nystagmus; mild spastic quadriparesis; ataxia; peripheral neuropathy; mild-to-moderate cognitive impairment | Present | Present; usually worsens after adolescence | 5th-7th decade |
| Complicated SPG (SPG2) & HEMS | 1st 5 yrs | Nystagmus; ataxia; autonomic dysfunction1; spastic gait; little or no cognitive impairment | Present | Present | 4th-7th decade |
| Uncomplicated SPG (SPG2) | Usually 1st 5 yrs; may be 3rd-4th decade | Autonomic dysfunction1; spastic gait; normal cognition | Present | Present | Normal |
HEMS = hypomyelination of early myelinating structures; PMD = Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease; SPG = spastic paraplegia
Spastic urinary bladder
Severe or "connatal" PMD is apparent at birth or in the first few weeks of life. Findings include pendular nystagmus, hypotonia, and stridor. Seizures may develop in affected infants, and motor deficits are severe (e.g., infants do not gain head control).
Later, children with severe PMD may have short stature and poor weight gain. Hypotonia later evolves into spasticity of the extremities that is usually quite severe. Children do not walk or develop effective use of the upper limbs. Verbal expression is severely limited, but comprehension may be significant. Swallowing difficulties may require feeding tube placement.
Affected children may die during infancy or childhood, usually of aspiration; with attentive care, they may live into the third decade or longer.
Classic PMD. Males with classic PMD usually develop nystagmus, which may not be recognized until several months of age; in rare instances, nystagmus does not develop. Affected children have hypotonia and develop titubation (tremor of the head and neck), ataxia, and spastic quadriparesis beginning in the first five years; they usually have some purposeful voluntary control of the arms. If acquired, ambulation usually requires assistive devices such as crutches or a walker; ambulation is generally lost as spasticity increases during later childhood or adolescence. Individuals may develop low bone density as mobility is reduced.
Cognitive abilities are usually mildly to moderately impaired but exceed those of the more severely affected children; language and speech usually develop. Extrapyramidal abnormalities, such as dystonic posturing and athetosis, may occur.
Survival into the sixth or seventh decade has been observed.
A transitional form, intermediate in onset and severity to the connatal and classic forms of PMD, has also been defined.
PLP1null syndrome is distinguished by the absence of nystagmus and the presence of relatively mild spastic quadriparesis that mostly affects the legs, with ataxia and mild multifocal demyelinating peripheral neuropathy. Those withPLP1 null syndrome generally ambulate better than those with classic PMD but may lose those skills and progress more rapidly because of degeneration of axons, inferred on the basis of magnetic resonance spectroscopy, which demonstrates reduced levels of white matter N-acetyl aspartate [Garbern et al 2002].
Complicated spastic paraparesis and hypomyelination of early myelinating structures (HEMS) often include autonomic dysfunction (e.g., spastic urinary bladder), ataxia, and nystagmus. A clear distinction cannot be drawn on objective criteria between complicated spastic paraplegia and relatively mild PMD (e.g.,PLP1null syndrome).
Pure spastic paraparesis (SPG2) does not, by definition, include other significant CNS signs, although autonomic dysfunction, such as spastic urinary bladder, may also occur. Life span is normal.
Males with SPG2 have reproduced; males with the PMDphenotype have not.
Visual, auditory, and somatosensory evoked potential testing show normal-to-near-normal latencies of the peripheral component of the respective sensory modality, but severely prolonged or absent central latencies. This does not indicate profound deafness, and hearing is usually clinically normal [Morlet et al 2018].
Except in individuals withPLP1null alleles, pathogenic variants affecting thePLP1-specificdomain encoded by amino acids 117-151, or somesplice site variants [Shy et al 2003,Vaurs-Barrière et al 2003], peripheral nerve conduction studies are normal [Henneke et al 2010]. When peripheral neuropathy is present, it is mild in comparison to the CNS disorder, and is characterized by mild slowing of conduction velocities that may be more pronounced across those regions of a limb susceptible to compression, such as the wrist and elbow.
Women with aPLP1pathogenic variant may or may not have clinical manifestations. Several investigators have observed that in families with severely affected males, theheterozygous women are unlikely to have features of aPLP1-related disorder, whereas in families with mildly affected males, the heterozygous women are more likely to have clinical manifestations [Keogh et al 2017]. Thus, an inverse relationship exists between the severity of manifestations in males and the likelihood of heterozygous females having neurologic signs.
The risk toheterozygous females of developing neurologic signs is greatest in families in which affected males have aPLP1null syndrome, followed by those in which affected males have an SPG2 syndrome or HEMS [Hurst et al 2006]. The risk of developing neurologic signs is lowest in heterozygous females with aPLP1duplication, who usually have favorably skewedX-chromosome inactivation [Woodward et al 2000].
The following explanation is offered:
Hurst et al [2006] analyzed families with SPG2 or PMD and provided statistical support for the inverse correlation between the severity of phenotypes in affected males and theirheterozygous relatives. These observations have important implications forgenetic counseling and are discussed in Genetic Counseling,Risk to Family Members,Sibs of a maleproband.
Manifesting heterozygotes are usually not index cases, but rather are identified in the course of evaluating the relatives of an affected male.
Females with PMD have been described. This is thought to be due to unfavorable X inactivation in the brain [Scala et al 2019]. In some, there was considerable improvement of clinical manifestations after infancy. One female with classic PMD had aninsertion of an extra copy ofPLP1 atchromosome 1p36 [Masliah-Planchon et al 2015]. Additional complex chromosome rearrangements in females with PMD have been described [Ida et al 2003,Yiu et al 2009].
Somegenotype-phenotype correlations exist.
Most individuals withPLP1 duplications have classic PMD; however, some are classified as having connatal PMD and may have three or more copies of thePLP1locus [Wolf et al 2005]. Variation in the extent ofduplication or location(s) of the breakpoints or reinsertion sites may account for clinical variability.
The most severe phenotypes are typically caused bymissense variants (especially nonconservative amino acid substitutions) and otherPLP1 single-nucleotide variants or indels.
SPG2 is most often caused by conservative amino acid substitutions in presumably less critical regions of the protein. The locations of these pathogenic variants do not provide a clear correlation between amino acid position and clinicalphenotype. However, pathogenic variants in thePLP1-specificdomain encoded by amino acid residues 117-151 and inintron 3 tend to cause less severe phenotypes [Cailloux et al 2000,Taube et al 2014,Kevelam et al 2015] (seeMolecular Genetics).
Individuals withnullPLP1 variants, includingdeletion ofPLP1 [Raskind et al 1991], aframeshift variant, and amissense variant affecting the initiation codon develop a relatively mild demyelinating peripheral neuropathy.
Peripheral neuropathy as well as a relatively mild CNS manifestations result from pathogenic variants that affect only thePLP1-specificdomain [Shy et al 2003] (seeMolecular Genetics).
PLP1 pathogenic variants are believed to be completely penetrant in males.
Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease is also known as sudanophilic or orthochromatic leukodystrophy.
SPG2 may also be referred to as HSP-PLP1 [Marras et al 2016].
HEMS (hypomyelination of early myelinating structures) is a subtype of SPG2 (i.e., complicated SPG2) with characteristic MRI abnormalities [Kevelam et al 2015].
Proteolipid protein 1 was previously called proteolipid protein. After discovery of a similargene that is predominantly expressed in gut, numerical designation was added.
Note also that the older literature usually begins numbering of the amino acids with the glycine encoded by codon 2, since the initiation methionine is cleaved post-translationally.
In the US population, the prevalence of PMD due to all causes is estimated at 1:200,000 to 1:500,000. In a survey of leukodystrophies in Germany, the incidence of PMD was approximately 0.13:100,000 live births [Heim et al 1997].
Seeman et al [2003] reported that in the Czech RepublicPLP1 pathogenic variants were detected in 1:90,000 births. While this may reflect a situation particular to the Czech Republic, it suggests that the prevalence ofPLP1-related disorders may be higher than is generally recognized.
No phenotypes other than those discussed in thisGeneReview are known to be associated withgermline pathogenic variants inPLP1.
Individuals withPLP1-related disorders are often initially diagnosed with cerebral palsy or static encephalopathy.
The combination of nystagmus within the first two years of life, initial hypotonia, and abnormal white matter changes on the brain MRI (e.g., abnormal signal in the posterior limbs of the internal capsule, the middle, and superior cerebellar peduncles and the medial and lateral lemnisci, all of which should be myelinated in a normal newborn) should suggest the diagnosis of PMD, especially if the family history is consistent with anX-linked disorder.
Hypomyelination occurs in several disorders with clinical phenotypes distinct from PMD.POLR3-related leukodystrophy (4H leukodystrophy) is the most frequent hypomyelinating disorder after PMD, individuals with 4H leukodystrophy usually do not have nystagmus, ataxia is prominent, and spasticity is mild or not present. Hypomyelination with atrophy of the basal ganglia and cerebellum (seeTUBB4A-Related Leukodystrophy) can present with pure hypomyelination, similar to PMD. Oculodentodigital dysplasia presents sometimes in adulthood, with a SPG-likephenotype; nystagmus is usually not present [Harting et al 2019]. (For MRI characteristics and differential diagnosis of hypomyelination see alsoSteenweg et al [2010] andvan der Knaap et al [2019]).
Approximately 20% of males with clinical findings consistent with aPLP1-related disorder do not have an identifiablePLP1pathogenic variant. Other genetic disorders associated with PMD-like phenotypes and hypomyelination on brain MRI include those listed inTable 3.
Genes of Interest in the Differential Diagnosis of Pelizaeus-Merzbacher Disease
| Gene(s) | Disorder | MOI | Features of Disorder | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overlapping with PMD | Distinguishing from PMD | |||
| AIFM1 | Hypomyelination w/spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia (OMIM300232) | XL | Hypomyelination | Spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia |
| CLDN11 | Hypomyelinating leukodystrophy 22 (OMIM619328) | AD |
| Slightly improving myelin deficit |
| DARS1 | Hypomyelination w/brain stem & spinal cord involvement & severe leg spasticity (OMIM615281) | AR |
| Characteristic involvement of brain stem & spinal cord structures on MRI |
| DEGS1 | Hypomyelinating leukodystrophy 18 (OMIM618404) | AR |
| Microcephaly, epilepsy, severe DD |
| EPRS1 | Hypomyelinating leukodystrophy 15 (OMIM617951) | AR |
| Posterior columns may be affected on MRI |
| GJA1 | Oculodentodigital dysplasia (OMIM164200) | AD | Hypomyelination |
|
| GJC2 | Pelizaeus-Merzbacher-like disease 1 | AR |
|
|
| HSPD1 | Hypomyelinating leukodystrophy 4 (OMIM612233) | AR |
|
|
| HYCC1 (FAM126A) | Hypomyelination & congenital cataract | AR |
|
|
| MAL | Hypomyelinating leukodystrophy 28 (OMIM620978) | AR |
| Mild hypomyelination |
| NKX6-2 | NKX6-2 disorder | AR |
|
|
| PI4KA | Later-onset pure hereditary spastic paraplegia (SPG84) (seePI4KA-Related Disorder) | AR |
| Inflammatory bowel disease, immune deficiency, lymphoma |
| POLR1A | Hypomyelinating leukodystrophy 18 (OMIM620675) | AR |
| Cerebellar atrophy |
| POLR3A POLR3B POLR3K POLR1C | POLR3-related leukodystrophy (4H leukodystrophy: hypomyelination, hypodontia, & hypogonadotropic hypogonadism) | AR |
|
|
| PPOX | Variegate porphyria with neurological involvement (OMIM620483) | AR |
|
|
| RARS1 | Hypomyelinating leukodystrophy 9 (OMIM616140) | AR |
|
|
| SLC16A2 | Allan-Hernon-Dudley syndrome (MCT8 deficiency) | XL |
|
|
| SLC17A5 | Salla disease (seeFree Sialic Acid Storage Disorders) | AR |
|
|
| SOX10 | PCWH syndrome (OMIM609136) | AD | Hypomyelination |
|
| TMEM106B | Hypomyelinating leukodystrophy 16 (OMIM617964) | AD |
| Milder clinical presentation (mild ataxia, mild cognitive impairment) |
| TMEM163 | Hypomyelinating leukodystrophy 25 (OMIM620243) | AD |
| Hypomyelination, may be transient |
| TMEM63A | Transient hypomyelination, hypomyelinating leukodystrophy 19 (OMIM618688) | AD | Initially indistinguishable from PMD (congenital nystagmus, hypotonia, hypomyelination) | Positive evolution w/normalization of development & MRI findings. |
| TUBB4A | Hypomyelination w/atrophy of basal ganglia & cerebellum (seeTUBB4A-Related Leukodystrophy) | AD |
| Usually involves atrophy of basal ganglia & cerebellum; butisolated hypomyelination possible |
AD =autosomal dominant; AR =autosomal recessive; DD = developmental delay; MOI =mode of inheritance; PCWH = peripheral demyelinating neuropathy, central dysmyelination, Waardenburg syndrome, and Hirschsprung disease; PMD = Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease; XL =X-linked
To date, more than 80 genetic types of hereditary spastic paraplegia have been defined. SeeMurala et al [2021] and theUncomplicated Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia Overview for clinical characteristics of other hereditary spastic paraplegias.
No clinical practice guidelines forPLP1-related disorders have been published. In the absence of published guidelines, the following recommendations are based on the authors' personal experience managing individuals with this disorder.
To establish the extent of disease and needs of an individual diagnosed with aPLP1-related disorder, the evaluations summarized inTable 4 (if not performed as part of the evaluation that led to the diagnosis) are recommended:
PLP1-Related Disorders: Recommended Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis
| System/Concern | Evaluation | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Respiratory | Assess severity of respiratory difficulties | |
| Gastrointestinal / Feeding | Gastroenterology / nutrition / feeding team eval |
|
| Neurologic | Neurologic eval for weakness, hypotonia, spasticity, ataxia, & ambulation | Consider EEG if seizures are a concern esp those w/most severe (connatal)phenotype. |
| Brain MRI is more helpful in those age ≥9 mos | |
| NCV to assess peripheral nerve function & identify individuals w/PLP1null syndrome | NCV studies are probably reliable in those age ≥4 yrs | |
| Development | Developmental assessment |
|
| Musculoskeletal | Orthopedics / physical medicine & rehab / PT & OT eval | To incl assessment of:
|
| Eyes | Ophthalmologic eval | To assess for nystagmus & visual impairment |
| Autonomic dysfunction | Assess for urinary dysfunction | |
| Genetic counseling | By genetics professionals1 | To obtain apedigree & inform affected persons & their families re nature, MOI, & implications of aPLP1-related disorder to facilitate medical & personal decision making |
| Family support & resources | By clinicians, wider care team, & family support organizations | Assessment of family & social structure to determine need for:
|
ADL = activities of daily living; MOI =mode of inheritance; MRS = magnetic resonance spectroscopy; NCV = nerve conduction velocity; OT = occupational therapy; PT = physical therapy
Clinical geneticist, certified genetic counselor, certified genetic nurse, genetics advanced practice provider (nurse practitioner or physician assistant)
Supportive care to improve quality of life, maximize function, and reduce complications is recommended. A multidisciplinary team comprising specialists in neurology, physical medicine, orthopedics, pulmonary medicine, and gastroenterology is optimal for care (seeTable 5) [Van Haren et al 2015].
PLP1-Related Disorders: Treatment of Manifestations
| Manifestation/Concern | Treatment | Considerations/Other |
|---|---|---|
| Respiratory | Respiratory support as per intensivist &/or pulmonologist as needed | |
| Feeding issues | Feeding therapy; gastrostomy tube placement may be required for persistent feeding issues especially in the most severely affected individuals. | Low threshold for clinical feeding eval &/or radiographic swallowing study when showing clinical signs or symptoms of dysphagia |
| Spasticity |
| Consider need for positioning & mobility devices, disability parking placard. |
| Epilepsy (typically only in those w/most severe [conatal]phenotype) | Standardized treatment w/ASM by experienced neurologist |
|
| Developmental delay / Intellectual disability / Neurobehavioral issues | SeeDevelopmental Delay / Intellectual Disability Management Issues. | |
| Ataxia |
|
|
| Scoliosis |
| Proper seating (esp wheelchair) & PT may reduce or prevent the need for surgery. |
| Ocular manifestations | Management as per ophthalmologist | |
| Autonomic dysfunction | Management of spastic urinary bladder as per urology. | Urge incontinence may be present inheterozygous females |
| Osteopenia | Treatment as per (pediatric) endocrinologist |
ADL = activities of daily living; ASM = anti-seizure medication; OT = occupational therapy; PT = physical therapy
Education of parents/caregivers regarding common seizure presentations is appropriate. For information on non-medical interventions and coping strategies for children diagnosed with epilepsy, seeEpilepsy Foundation Toolbox.
The following information represents typical management recommendations for individuals with developmental delay / intellectual disability in the US; standard recommendations may vary from country to country.
Ages 0-3 years. Referral to an early intervention program is recommended for access to occupational, physical, speech, and feeding therapy as well as infant mental health services, special educators, and sensory impairment specialists. In the US, early intervention is a federally funded program available in all states that provides in-home services to target individual therapy needs.
Ages 3-5 years. In the US, developmental preschool through the local public school district is recommended. Before placement, an evaluation is made to determine needed services and therapies and an individualized education plan (IEP) is developed for those who qualify based on established motor, language, social, or cognitive delay. The early intervention program typically assists with this transition. Developmental preschool is center based; for children too medically unstable to attend, home-based services are provided.
All ages. Consultation with a developmental pediatrician is recommended to ensure the involvement of appropriate community, state, and educational agencies (US) and to support parents in maximizing quality of life. Some issues to consider:
Gross motor dysfunction
Fine motor dysfunction. Occupational therapy is recommended for difficulty with fine motor skills that affect adaptive function such as feeding, grooming, dressing, and writing.
Oral motor dysfunction should be assessed at each visit and clinical feeding evaluations and/or radiographic swallowing studies should be obtained for choking/gagging during feeds, poor weight gain, frequent respiratory illnesses, or feeding refusal that is not otherwise explained. Assuming that the child is safe to eat by mouth, feeding therapy (typically from an occupational or speech therapist) is recommended to help improve coordination or sensory-related feeding issues. Feeds can be thickened or chilled for safety. When feeding dysfunction is severe, an NG-tube or G-tube may be necessary.
Communication issues. Consider evaluation for alternative means of communication (e.g.,augmentative and alternative communication [AAC]) for individuals who have expressive language difficulties. An AAC evaluation can be completed by a speech-language pathologist who has expertise in the area. The evaluation will consider cognitive abilities and sensory impairments to determine the most appropriate form of communication. AAC devices can range from low-tech, such as picture exchange communication, to high-tech, such as voice-generating devices. Contrary to popular belief, AAC devices do not hinder verbal development of speech, but rather support optimal speech and language development.
To monitor existing manifestations, the individual's response to supportive care, and the emergence of new manifestations, the following evaluations are recommended.
PLP1-Related Disorders: Recommended Surveillance
| System/Concern | Evaluation | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Nutrition / Feeding |
| At each visit |
| Neurologic | Neurologic eval for weakness, hypotonia, spasticity, ataxia, & ambulation | Every 6-12 mos |
| EEG if seizures are a concern esp those w/most severe (connatal)phenotype. | As needed | |
| Development / Cognition | Monitor developmental progress & educational needs. | Every 6-12 mos in children / adolescents |
| Cognitive assessment | Every 6-12 mos in older individuals | |
| Musculoskeletal |
| Every 6-12 mos |
| Assess for low bone density | As needed | |
| Eyes | Ophthalmologic eval to assess for nystagmus & visual impairment | As recommended by ophthalmology |
| Autonomic dysfunction | Assess for urinary dysfunction | As recommended by urology |
| Family/Community | Assess family need for social work support (e.g., palliative/respite care, home nursing, other local resources), care coordination, or follow-upgenetic counseling if new questions arise (e.g., family planning). | At each visit |
OT = occupational therapy; PT = physical therapy
Elevated body temperature, as with fever, may cause neurologic manifestations to transiently worsen.
SeeGenetic Counseling for issues related to testing of at-risk relatives forgenetic counseling purposes.
CNS stem cells were transplanted into brains of individuals with PMD in a US FDA-approved Phase I trial [Gupta et al 2012]. The procedure was well tolerated, however minimal evidence of myelination was thought to be present in the transplanted regions. Several years later, the situation was unchanged [Gupta et al 2019].
Pharmacologic agents that lower expression ofPLP1 should be of theoretic benefit in individuals with extra copies ofPLP1, as well as those with pathogenic variants associated with protein overexpression. Gene therapy using inhibitory RNA (antisense oligonucleotides) is currently being evaluated in a clinical trial and was effective in disease models [Elitt et al 2020]. Deferiprone, an iron chelator, is currently being evaluated in a clinical trial and has shown to improve thephenotype of cell and animal models in PMD [Nobuta et al 2019]. Curcumin had promise in cell models of PMD but was not effective in a small group of individuals with PMD [Yamamoto et al 2024].
SearchClinicalTrials.gov in the US andEU Clinical Trials Register in Europe for access to information on clinical studies for a wide range of diseases and conditions.
Genetic counseling is the process of providing individuals and families withinformation on the nature, mode(s) of inheritance, and implications of genetic disorders to help themmake informed medical and personal decisions. The following section deals with geneticrisk assessment and the use of family history and genetic testing to clarify geneticstatus for family members; it is not meant to address all personal, cultural, orethical issues that may arise or to substitute for consultation with a geneticsprofessional. —ED.
ThePLP1-related disorders – Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease (PMD),PLP1null syndrome, hypomyelination of early myelinating structures (HEMS), and spastic paraplegia 2 (SPG2) – are inherited in anX-linked manner.
Parents of a maleproband
Sibs of a maleproband. The risk to sibs depends on the genetic status of the mother:
Offspring of a maleproband
Other family members of a maleproband. The proband's maternal aunts and their offspring may be at risk of beingheterozygous, and manifesting mild-to-moderate signs of the disease, or of beinghemizygous and affected (depending on their sex, family relationship, and the genetic status of the proband's mother).
Identification of female heterozygotes requires prior identification of thePLP1pathogenic variant in the family.
Note: (1) Females who areheterozygous for thisX-linked disorder are usually neurologically normal but may manifest mild-to-moderate signs of the disease. (2) Molecular genetic testing may be able to identify the family member in whom ade novopathogenic variant arose, information that could help determine genetic risk status of the extended family.
Phenotypic variability. It is important for couples at risk to be aware that varying phenotypes can coexist in the same kindred or sibship; thus, families in which males have had a milderphenotype are at risk of having affected offspring who may display a more severe phenotype.
Distantly inserted duplications. While distantly inserted duplications are a rare cause ofPLP1-related disorders, they may raise potentially difficultgenetic counseling issues because the inheritance pattern may not beX-linked [Hodes et al 2000,Inoue et al 2002]. In rare instances, the duplicated region can be inserted at some distance from Xq22 such as 19qtel [Inoue et al 2002] and in the Ychromosome [Woodward et al 2005].
Family planning
Once thePLP1pathogenic variant has been identified in an affected family member, prenatal andpreimplantation genetic testing (PGT) are possible. However; the prenatal or PGT finding of afamilialPLP1 pathogenic variant cannot be used to accurately predict clinical outcome, as varying phenotypes may coexist in the same kindred or sibship; families in which males have had a milderphenotype are at risk of having affected offspring with a more severe phenotype and females may be neurologically normal or manifest mild-to-moderate signs of the disease.
Differences in perspective may exist among medical professionals and within families regarding the use ofprenatal testing. While most centers would consider use of prenatal testing to be a personal decision, discussion of these issues may be helpful.
GeneReviews staff has selected the following disease-specific and/or umbrellasupport organizations and/or registries for the benefit of individuals with this disorderand their families. GeneReviews is not responsible for the information provided by otherorganizations. For information on selection criteria, clickhere.
Information in the Molecular Genetics and OMIM tables may differ from that elsewhere in the GeneReview: tables may contain more recent information. —ED.
PLP1-Related Disorders: Genes and Databases
| Gene | Chromosome Locus | Protein | Locus-Specific Databases | HGMD | ClinVar |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLP1 | Xq22 | Myelin proteolipid protein | PLP1 @ LOVD | PLP1 | PLP1 |
OMIM Entries for PLP1-Related Disorders (View All in OMIM)
PLP1 encodes myelin proteolipid protein 1 (PLP1), which is the predominant protein constituent of central nervous system (CNS) myelin, constituting approximately 50% of the myelin protein mass. An additionalgene product, the isoform DM20, which lacks thePLP1-specificdomain encoded by amino acids 117-151, is also encoded byPLP1. PLP1 and DM20 are both transmembrane proteins that span the lipid bilayer four times and are anchored to cell membranes through covalent acyl linkages to fatty acids. There is evidence that PLP1 cements adjacent leaflets of myelin; however, additional or alternative functions are also possible [Griffiths et al 1998,Aggarwal et al 2011].
PLP1, but not DM20, has been shown to form dimers at an intracellular cysteine residue [Daffu et al 2012]. This dimerization may contribute to the molecular pathogenesis of Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease (PMD), both in affected individuals with indels and those with duplications.
Mechanism of disease causation. Duplication ofPLP1 results in overexpression of PLP1, leading to dysfunction and death of oligodendrocytes, the myelin-forming cells in the CNS [Griffiths et al 1998,Yool et al 2000]. Increased PLP1 expression results in mislocalization of PLP1 along with cholesterol and lipids to the late endosomal/lysosomal compartment [Simons et al 2000]. The association of hypomyelination and subsequent axonal injury in PMD and other leukodystrophies is reviewed byMar & Noetzel [2010].
Pathogenicmissense variants cause misfolding of PLP1 or DM20. These misfolded proteins are retained in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), failing to be incorporated into the cell membrane where they activate the unfolded protein response [Southwood et al 2002,Inoue 2017]. In a severe mouse model, the jimpy mouse, there is ER stress and subsequent cell death when oligodendrocyte progenitors mature [Elitt et al 2018].
Deletion ofPLP1, and probably otherloss-of-function variants, result in mild myelin defects but subsequent more severe axonal degeneration [Garbern et al 2002].
Variants in thePLP1 specific part of thegene (described asexon 3B) and the adjacentintron 3 lead to hypomyelination of early myelinating structures, through decreased PLP1 expression in relation to DM20 [Taube et al 2014,Kevelam et al 2015].
PLP1-specific laboratory considerations. Some deepintronic variants outside of the immediate splice junction regions have been associated withPLP1-related disorders (seeTable 7) [Taube et al 2014,Kevelam et al 2015]. Of note, the complete conservation of amino acid sequence between rodent and humanPLP1 suggests little tolerance for sequence variation.
PLP1 Pathogenic Variants Referenced in ThisGeneReview
| Reference Sequences | DNA Nucleotide Change | Predicted Protein Change | Comment [Reference] |
|---|---|---|---|
| NM_000533 | c.453+159G>A | -- | Deepintronic variants assoc w/HEMS [Kevelam et al 2015] |
| c.453+164G>A | -- | ||
| c.454-312C>G | -- |
HEMS = hypomyelination of early myelinating structures
Variants listed in the table have been provided by the authors.GeneReviews staff have not independently verified the classification of variants.
GeneReviews follows the standard naming conventions of the Human Genome Variation Society (varnomen
The authors are grateful to the Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease Foundation, the Children's Research Center of Michigan, the Nemours Foundation, the NIH, and affected individuals and families of those with Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease.
James Y Garbern, MD, PhD; University of Rochester Medical Center (1999-2011*)
Grace M Hobson, PhD (2006-present)
John Kamholz, MD, PhD; University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics (2013-2025)
Karen Krajewski, MS; Wayne State University School of Medicine/Detroit Medical Center (2006-2010)
Rosalina ML van Spaendonk, PhD (2019-present)
Nicole I Wolf, MD, PhD (2019-present)
* James Y Garbern was a specialist in leukodystrophies and hereditary neurologic disorders and an internationally recognized expert on PMD. Dr Garbern died in November 2011.
GeneReviews® chapters are owned by the University of Washington. Permission ishereby granted to reproduce, distribute, and translate copies of content materials fornoncommercial research purposes only, provided that (i) credit for source (http://www.genereviews.org/) and copyright (© 1993-2026 University ofWashington) are included with each copy; (ii) a link to the original material is providedwhenever the material is published elsewhere on the Web; and (iii) reproducers,distributors, and/or translators comply with theGeneReviews® Copyright Notice and UsageDisclaimer. No further modifications are allowed. For clarity, excerptsof GeneReviews chapters for use in lab reports and clinic notes are a permitteduse.
For more information, see theGeneReviews® Copyright Notice and UsageDisclaimer.
For questions regarding permissions or whether a specified use is allowed,contact:ude.wu@tssamda.
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...