Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

European Journal of Human Genetics
Download PDF
  • News and Commentary
  • Published:

Biological clock: Biological clocks may modulate drug addiction

European Journal of Human Geneticsvolume 13pages1101–1103 (2005)Cite this article

A recent study by McClung's group (2005),1 expanding on an earlier report,2 provides mechanistic insight to the timekeeper gene,Clock, which may regulate dopaminergic transmission and cocaine reward. This work provides further evidence that cocaine-induced effects have circadian influences.

McClung and colleagues studiedClock/Clock mutant mice,3 with a single-nucleotide transversion that inactivates the CLOCK protein, and found that they have an increased level of locomotor activity with a circadian activity pattern. Consistent with the observed hyperactivity,Clock/Clock mutant mice displayed increased levels of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH; a rate-limiting enzyme of dopamine synthesis) in ventral tegmental area (VTA) cells, as well as increased bursting and firing activity. TH-positive cells in the VTA were also positive for CLOCK protein, indicating potential local regulation of TH by CLOCK. Microarray studies in these mutants revealed that several target genes of CLOCK were downregulated in VTA (notablyPer1 andPer2). Intriguingly, other genes involved in excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission (ie glutamatergic or GABAergic) were also regulated in these mutant mice. Several groups have shown that expression of timekeeper genes in rodents or flies increases after exposure to cocaine, amphetamines, alcohol and morphine.

McClunget al1 found thatClock/Clock mutants exhibited robust sensitization to the locomotor-stimulating effects of repeated cocaine, indicating that functional CLOCK protein is not necessary for this form of cocaine-induced plasticity. These mutant mice also displayed modestly increased cocaine-induced place preference, a model for the rewarding effects of this psychostimulant.

Recent studies clarified the core molecular mechanisms of the circadian clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the hypothalamus, which consists of autoregulatory transcription–translation loops with a periodicity of about 24 h. The positive loop is constituted by transcription factors CLOCK and BMAL1 that activate transcription ofPer1,Per2 andCry genes. The PER and CRY proteins assist in the negative feedback by attenuation of the CLOCK/BMAL1 transcription, thus inhibiting their own activation.4 Timekeeper genes, as transcription factors, may have an impact on the expression of target genes with E-box sequences in their promoter regions, such as dopamine and glutamate transporters, D1 dopamine receptor.

Based on previous studies and this report, it seems that changes in function or expression of different members of the timekeeper gene family may lead to alterations in one or another aspect of drug-induced behaviors. The earliest studies, which were performed by Hirsch and colleagues inDrosophila,5 showed, in sharp contrast to the report herein, that deletion of four different timekeeper genes (Clock,Per,Cycle and Doubletime, but notTime-less) resulted in the complete elimination of sensitization to repeated cocaine administration. A study by Abarca's group6 showed differential roles ofPer1 andPer2 genes in cocaine-induced behaviors in mice. Our microarray study showed thatPer1 mRNA expression is increased in the caudate–putamen of rats by acute ‘binge’ cocaine, whereas Per2 mRNA is upregulated only after repeated binge cocaine.7Per1 knockout mice did not exhibit behavioral sensitization to repeated cocaine administration, whereasPer2 knockout mice displayed more potent cocaine-induced place preference. Also,Per2 knockout mice showed a higher rate of alcohol consumption.8 In addition, mice with inactivatedPer1 mRNA did not display morphine-induced place preference.9 Interestingly, chronic morphine-induced increases in the expression ofPer2 gene in the rat frontal cortex persisted after naloxone-precipitated withdrawal.10 These data implicate timekeeper genes in common mechanisms of drug abuse-related behaviors (Figure 1).

Figure 1
figure 1

Central and basal forebrain molecular circadian clock.*Timekeeper genes identified to date in four brain regions involved in processes related to drug addiction, including dopaminergic neurons of the mesolimbic/mesocortical (a) and nigrostriatal (b) dopaminergic systems.Circadian genes:Bmal1, ARNT-like protein 1;Clock, Clock; Cry2, Cryptochrome 2;Per1, Period 1;Per2, Period 2;TIM, Timeless.

The various timekeeper genes, which may have different effects in different parts of the brain and periphery, have been studied to a limited extent, with respect to the genetic basis for specific human disorders. In contrast to numerous single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) found in other human timekeeper genes such asPer1,Per2, only two variants have been found in theClock gene: one in the 5′-UTR (101 bp upstream of ATG codon) and 3111 T>C in the 3′-UTR regions.11 A number of studies demonstrated an association of the 3111 T>C SNP with major depression, as well as insomnia and mood disorders.Per2 gene polymorphisms have been associated with bipolar disorders, and thePer3 gene has been associated with delayed sleep phase syndrome, and extreme diurnal preference. This may be relevant for patients with addictive diseases, who frequently adopt abnormal sleep–wake patterns with drug self-administration, of especially alcohol, cocaine and other stimulants. Such self-administration occurs primarily in the early and late evening hours (and sometimes through the night). In contrast, heroin (or other short-acting opiate) addicts usually space their self-administration during regular intervals in daytime and evening, although they may shift their sleep period later than normal, and wake up in the morning in opiate withdrawal.

To date, only one of these genes has been studied for an association with addictive diseases. Spanagel and colleagues reported a study ofPer2 gene in 215 alcohol-dependent subjects with low or high alcohol intake, and identified a haplotype of four gene variants associated with low alcohol intake.8 With rodent studies included in the same report, Spanagelet al8 found thatPer2 mutant mice drank more alcohol than controls. Also, the brain of mutant mice contained excess levels of glutamate, a situation associated with both cocaine and other stimulant exposure, as well as alcoholism. This finding may be related to the reduction in astrocyte-expressed transporter EAAT1, coupled with a modest increase in a second transporter, EAAT2.8

Further studies of relationships of polymorphisms or haplotypes in timekeeper-related genes in specific addictive diseases would be of interest. Studies from our laboratory12 have identified a functional polymorphism of MOR (mu opioid receptor); we then hypothesized, and other laboratories subsequently have identified, that one copy of this SNP alters critical hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) responsivity to stress. Much earlier, our group and others have shown that the MOR plays a major role in the HPA axis, which is normally under circadian control. We have recently shown a very significant association of this A118G variant of the MOR with both heroin addiction and alcoholism (reviewed in Kreeket al, 2005).13 Therefore, it would be of great interest to determine if polymorphisms of one or more of the timekeeper genes are associated with specific addictive diseases, and possibly with alterations in the stress-responsive circadian HPA axis. This axis has been shown, in laboratory and human studies, to contribute to the acquisition, continuation and relapse to specific addictions▪

References

  1. McClung CA, Sidiropoulou K, Vitaterna Met al: Regulation of dopaminergic transmission and cocaine reward by theClock gene.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102: 9377–9381.

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sidiropoulou K, Cooper DC, Baker Let al: Basal hyperactivity and behavioral sensitization to cocaine in clock mutant mice.Soc Neurosci Abstr 2000;26: 525.

    Google Scholar 

  3. King DP, Zhao Y, Sangoram AMet al: Positional cloning of the mouse circadianclock gene.Cell 1997;89: 641–653.

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Young MW, Kay SA : Time zones: a comparative genetics of circadian clocks.Nat Rev Genet 2001;2: 702–715.

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Andretic R, Chaney S, Hirsh J : Requirement of circadian genes for cocaine sensitization inDrosophila.Science 1999;285: 1066–1068.

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Abarca C, Albrecht U, Spanagel R : Cocaine sensitization and reward are under the influence of circadian genes and rhythm.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99: 9026–9030.

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yuferov V, Kroslak T, Laforge KSet al: Differential gene expression in the rat caudate putamen after ‘binge’ cocaine administration: advantage of triplicate microarray analysis.Synapse 2003;48: 157–169.

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Spanagel R, Pendyala G, Abarca Cet al: Theclock genePer2 influences the glutamatergic system and modulates alcohol consumption.Nat Med 2005;11: 35–42.

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu Y, Wang Y, Wan Cet al: The role of mPer1 in morphine dependence in mice.Neuroscience 2005;130: 383–388.

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ammon S, Mayer P, Riechert U, Tischmeyer H, Hollt V : Microarray analysis of genes expressed in the frontal cortex of rats chronically treated with morphine and after naloxone precipitated withdrawal.Brain Res Mol Brain Res 2003;112: 113–125.

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Steeves TD, King DP, Zhao Yet al: Molecular cloning and characterization of the humanCLOCK gene: expression in the suprachiasmatic nuclei.Genomics 1999;57: 189–200.

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bond C, LaForge KS, Tian Met al: Single-nucleotide polymorphism in the human mu opioid receptor gene alters beta-endorphin binding and activity: possible implications for opiate addiction.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95: 9608–9613.

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kreek MJ, Bart G, Lilly C, LaForge KS, Nielsen DA : Pharmacogenetics and human molecular genetics of opiate and cocaine addictions and their treatments.Pharmacol Rev 2005;57: 1–26.

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA

    Vadim Yuferov, Eduardo R Butelman & Mary J Kreek

Authors
  1. Vadim Yuferov
  2. Eduardo R Butelman
  3. Mary J Kreek

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yuferov, V., Butelman, E. & Kreek, M. Biological clock: Biological clocks may modulate drug addiction.Eur J Hum Genet13, 1101–1103 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201483

Download citation

This article is cited by

Download PDF

Advertisement

Search

Advanced search

Quick links


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp