Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature
Download PDF

Inducing novel endosymbioses by implanting bacteria in fungi

Naturevolume 635pages415–422 (2024)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Endosymbioses have profoundly impacted the evolution of life and continue to shape the ecology of a wide range of species. They give rise to new combinations of biochemical capabilities that promote innovation and diversification1,2. Despite the many examples of known endosymbioses across the tree of life, their de novo emergence is rare and challenging to uncover in retrospect3,4,5. Here we implant bacteria into the filamentous fungusRhizopus microsporus to follow the fate of artificially induced endosymbioses. WhereasEscherichia coli implanted into the cytosol induced septum formation, effectively halting endosymbiogenesis,Mycetohabitans rhizoxinica was transmitted vertically to the progeny at a low frequency. Continuous positive selection on endosymbiosis mitigated initial fitness constraints by several orders of magnitude upon adaptive evolution. Phenotypic changes were underscored by the accumulation of mutations in the host as the system stabilized. The bacterium produced rhizoxin congeners in its new host, demonstrating the transfer of a metabolic function through induced endosymbiosis. Single-cell implantation thus provides a powerful experimental approach to study critical events at the onset of endosymbiogenesis and opens opportunities for synthetic approaches towards designing endosymbioses with desired traits.

Similar content being viewed by others

Main

Intracellular endosymbioses are extraordinarily intimate interactions between organisms. They join two complex metabolic networks in a compartmentalized manner and are subjected to natural selection as a unit. This metabolic integration predisposes endosymbioses to enable major transitions in evolution1,2. Accommodating an endosymbiont can benefit the host by acquiring chemical defence systems and unlocking essential nutrients or new energy sources2,6,7,8. However, many obstacles limit de novo endosymbiogenesis3,4,5. Besides the first hurdle of host cell entry, a prospective endosymbiont must overcome challenges associated with immune responses, metabolism and growth synchronization3,9,10. Even if the combined metabolisms theoretically sustain growth in silico11, unstable outcomes are the prevailing norm, failing to stabilize vertical transmission11,12.

Studying established natural partnerships has provided insights into the intricate interactions of extant endosymbioses. These include mitochondria and chloroplasts as relicts of ancient bacterial endosymbionts, as well as insect endosymbionts that have long been vertically transmitted and have undergone genome reduction13. However, shifting balances of control between the partners, phases of stabilization and destabilization and equivocal lines between mutualism and antagonism blur evolutionary trajectories13,14,15,16. Consequently, the earliest steps in endosymbiogenesis remain difficult to uncover15. Synthetic approaches can provide well-defined starting points to follow stable and unstable outcomes. Interventional studies have focused mainly on insects, in which transinfection has revealed important aspects of endosymbiogenesis, such as control of bacterial replication17,18 and metabolic cooperation19,20. However, attempts in other phyla, such as installing engineeredE.coli or cyanobacteria in yeast21,22, have not resulted in stable endosymbiosis under strict selection.

Here we set out to generate a novel endosymbiotic partnership in a non-host filamentous fungus. The model system consisted of the early divergent fungusRhizopusmicrosporus and the cytosolic bacterial endosymbiontMycetohabitans rhizoxinica23,24. Certain host strains ofR.microsporus containMycetohabitans endosymbionts25. In these, vertical inheritance is strict, as the fungus cannot sporulate without the endosymbiont, which reliably colonizes the spores26,27. This probably drives co-diversification25. The association is presumed mutually beneficial28, with bacterially produced rhizoxin congeners29,30 providing the fungus fitness advantages by protecting against amoeba and nematodes31, and aiding in nutrient acquisition by causing rice seedling blight23. Both partners can be cultured axenically, and host strains cured from the endosymbiont are readily reinfected byM.rhizoxinica26,32. By contrast, non-host strains resist natural colonization and do not require endosymbionts for sporangiospore formation33,34. For this study,R.microsporus strain EH (endosymbiont-harbouring) and strain NH (non-harbouring) were used.

To study initial endosymbiogenesis events, we used single-cell approaches to observe cellular responses before environmental selection could act. Fluidic force microscopy (FluidFM)35 was recently adapted to inject bacteria into mammalian cells, bypassing cellular entry steps and enabling evaluation of engineered pairs to test intracellular growth36,37. Applying this technique to fungi is challenging owing to the complexity of fungal mycelia, the rigid cell wall and high turgor pressure38,39. In this work, we report a procedure to implant bacteria intoR.microsporus that enabled real-time tracking using confocal microscopy and characterizing early adaptations in the endosymbiosis under stabilizing selection pressure.

Bacteria delivery into fungal hyphae

We have previously shown that with FluidFM, bacteria can be injected into mammalian cells36,37 and small molecules can be injected into fungi39. However, the physical placement of bacteria into a fungal hypha had not been achieved with this technique and is experimentally more challenging. We used cylindrical tips with aperture sizes of 500–1,000 nm to allow the passage of bacteria while minimizing wound size. To improve our ability to puncture fungal cells, we sharpened the apex of the cylindrical FluidFM probes into a double point using focused ion beam milling (Fig.1) and increased the applied force. In addition, the cell wall of the germlings was softened using an enzyme mixture in osmoprotective solution. Despite this treatment, pressures up to 6.5 bar were necessary for injection. With this approach, we were able to implant about 1–30 bacteria per injection event into anR.microsporus germling. The workflow also allowed isolation of injected germlings, subsequent imaging of fluorescently tagged bacteria inside the host cell, and culturing of the isolated germlings on agar plates to grow them until sporulation (Fig.1).

Fig. 1: Workflow for bacteria injection into fungal germlings.
figure 1

FluidFM injection takes place on a glass dish surface placed above an inverted confocal light microscope. The probe apex is sharpened to a double point with an aperture of 500 to 1,000 nm. Inset: focused ion beam image of probe apex; scale bar, 500 nm. The turgor of the hypha is overcome by applying up to 6.5 bar overpressure. After the injection, the still-attached germling can be isolated into an empty dish, in which the recovery and growth of the microorganisms can be observed. The injected germling can subsequently be detached from the probe and transferred to a Petri dish for further cultivation until sporulation. Created withBioRender.com.

Injection ofM.rhizoxinica labelled with green fluorescent protein (GFP) into its natural hostR.microsporus strain EH confirmed that both partners survived the injection procedure. Colonization was validated by microscopic observation (Supplementary Video 1). On the basis of the velocity, bidirectionality, the tracks followed and the motion in relation to the general cytoplasmic contents, the bacteria are probably moving both by active transport along microtubules and by passive transport through cytoplasmic bulk flow (Supplementary Videos 2 and3). Microtubules have been shown to be involved in the transportation ofWolbachia-containing vesicles inDrosophila40, but not in the transport of directly cytosolic endosymbionts or in fungi. We speculate thatM.rhizoxinica may be able to attach to the microtubule-dependent motors dyneins and kinesins, through fungal cargo adaptor proteins or hitchhiking adaptor proteins41. The inhibition of dynein by transient exposure to ciliobrevin D, a reversible and cell-permeable small molecule, led to the transient cessation of bacterial transport within the germling (Supplementary Video 4).

To follow the expected vertical transmission of the endosymbiont in this reconstituted natural endosymbiosis, we used fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and microscopy to accurately classify large numbers of spores for their colonization status with fluorescently labelled bacteria. This analysis confirmed the stable inheritance of the implanted bacteria in spores.

Injection ofE. coli intoRhizopus

After reconstituting the natural endosymbiosis as proof of concept, we investigated the fate of the a priori non-endosymbiotic but intracellularly viable bacterium,E.coli, insideR.microsporus. E.coli has been shown to multiply rapidly in the cytosol of mammalian cells, resulting in host cell killing36. We injected GFP-labelledE.coli intoR.microsporus strain EH and strain NH (Fig.2a and Supplementary Videos 5 and6). After injection, both partners remained viable, butE.coli intracellular replication and localization dynamics differed substantially from that ofM.rhizoxinica in its natural host.E.coli proliferated more rapidly within the hyphae, dividing bacteria generally stayed together, and the resulting bacterial clumps dispersed only slowly, following the cytoplasmic bulk flow within hyphae (Supplementary Videos 5 and6). Combined, these dynamics led to the emergence of local hotspots with high bacterial density. The fungi formed septa around these densely populated areas, resulting in compartments with and withoutE.coli. Bacteria-free compartments continued to grow normally, whereas compartments with bacteria became entirely filled, and occasionally burst open (Supplementary Videos 5 and6). Defence by septa formation has previously been observed withR.microsporus strain EH responding toM.rhizoxinica mutants lacking the effectorMycetohabitans transcription activator-like effector 1 (MTAL1), which presumably helps the bacterium elude fungal defences42. Although someE.coli cells dispersed within individual hyphae over larger distances, leading to the formation of septa at sites remote from the original physical delivery (Fig.2a and Supplementary Video 5), noE.coli could be detected in the spores collected from injected fungi, as evaluated by FACS (detection limit 1/1,000,000 positive spores,n = 3; Fig.2c). These experiments showed that the fungus recognized unadapted bacterial intruders and triggered a defence reaction to physically contain the bacteria in separated hyphal compartments, allowing growth to proceed normally in uninfected hyphae.

Fig. 2: Injection ofM.rhizoxinica, but notE.coli, leads to vertical transmission of endosymbionts.
figure 2

a, Images show the growth of the fungus andE.coli cells (yellow) at different time points. In the left image, the dark shape is the FluidFM probe, and the white arrowhead marks the apex of the probe inserted in the germling. In the right image, the white arrowheads indicate formed septa preventing bacterial spread. Images with differing magnification have different illumination settings and contrast adjustments.E.coli injections were carried out three times each inR.microsporus strain EH and strain NH with similar results (totaln = 6). Shown here is strain EH.b,M.rhizoxinica replicates inR.microsporus strain NH (see also Supplementary Video4). The experiment was carried out four times with similar results.c, Flow cytometry plots for spores collected fromR.microsporus strain NH after no bacteria injection (top),E.coli injection (middle) andM.rhizoxinica injection (bottom). After injection withM.rhizoxinica, a high-GFP-signal fraction is observed (dashed grey rectangle), stemming from labelled bacteria. The experiment was carried out three times with similar results. Samples were run on different days on the same machine.d, Images showing positively FACS-sorted spores with intracellular bacteria. Top: hostR.microsporus strain EH populated with the natural endosymbiont. Bottom: injectedR.microsporus strain NH populated withM.rhizoxinica. The experiment was carried out four times with similar results.e, Image showing a germling from the positively sorted spore fraction ofR.microsporus strain NH injected withM.rhizoxinica. The bacteria are distributed within the whole germling and are present in higher density than directly after an injection. The experiment was carried out four times with similar results. Fora,b,d,e, images show a single-z-layer wide-field image overlaid with the two-dimensional projection of the GFP-signalz-stack in yellow. Scale bars, 10 μm (a, two left images,b), 40 μm (a, two right images), 5 μm (d) and 20 μm (e).

Vertical transmission ofM.rhizoxinica

We next sought to generate a novel endosymbiosis by implanting GFP-labelledM.rhizoxinica intoR.microsporus strain NH, which naturally does not harbour endosymbionts and readily forms spores without bacterial presence. After injection, the bacteria divided and exhibited transport dynamics similar to those observed in its host strain EH (Fig.2b and Supplementary Videos 7 and8). FACS revealed that a subset of the spores produced by the injected and cultivated germlings were colonized by bacteria (Fig.2c). We confirmed microscopically that the positively sorted spores (≤4%; Extended Data Table1) indeed harboured bacteria (Fig.2d). When exposed to rich medium, some of the positive spores germinated successfully and retained high numbers of replicating bacteria that spread through the hyphae (Fig.2e). These findings showed thatM.rhizoxinica can be vertically transmitted inR.microsporus strain NH, and that implantation by FluidFM combined with selection by FACS can expand the host range of an endosymbiotic bacterium to a new host.

Adaptive evolution of endosymbiosis

Building on the observed vertical transmission ofM.rhizoxinica implanted into a novel host,R.microsporus strain NH, we next conducted an adaptive laboratory evolution experiment. To exert a stringent selection pressure, spores containing bacteria were sorted by FACS and propagated through successive rounds of growth and selection (Fig.3a). To start, spores originating from a single injected germling were sorted. The positive spores were split into ten lines and subsequently propagated separately for seven rounds (see Fig.3a andMethods for details). Three high-performing lines, and the pooled remaining seven lines, were propagated for three more rounds. After each round of sporulation, we measured the percentage of the spores that contained bacteria (positive fraction), as well as the germination success of these spores. At the beginning of the evolution experiment, the germination success of positive spores was severely impaired. Whereas spores without bacteria had a germination success of 63%, the germination success of spores containing bacteria was reduced tenfold and was only 6.3% (Fig.3b), suggesting that the presence of bacteria imposes a substantial cost on host fitness. The germination success of the positive spores had increased to 75% in the tenth round and was no longer distinguishable from that of spores without bacteria (Fig.3b and Extended Data Fig.1). Likewise, the positive fraction had increased from 0.01% to up to 24.1% at the end of the experiment (Fig.3c). Both the germination success and the positive fraction directly affected the fitness of the endosymbiosis in an evolutionary sense (that is, the total amount of viable offspring with endosymbiont). We therefore defined the fitness index of the endosymbiosis outcome as the product of the two values. By round 7, the fitness index had increased from the initial 0.0006% to up to 8.7% with an average of 4.4% (Fig.3d). The average fitness index in round 10 reached 14.0%, with the highest value noted for line 4 at 25.3%. An additional cost to the fungus observed over the course of the evolution was a delayed germination for spores with bacteria compared to that for spores without bacteria (Fig.3e). Taken together, the findings of the adaptive laboratory evolution experiment showed that the artificially induced endosymbiosis can be stably propagated in the new host upon positive selection. Over time the fitness index of the endosymbiosis increased, indicating adaptation towards improved transmission.

Fig. 3: Adaptive laboratory evolution experiment leads to higher fitness of the induced endosymbiosis.
figure 3

a, Scheme of population sizes and line management throughout the experiment. Black dots indicate spore collection events with measurement of positive fraction and germination success, and sorting of positive spores. Black squares mark collection events in which, additionally, genomic DNA was isolated from the population and sequenced. Grey bars illustrate the number of positive spores plated. Round 1 spore collection isR.microsporus strain NH germling injected withM.rhizoxinica. The hexagon marks round 10 of line 4.b, The germination success of bacteria-positive spores (blue) and bacteria-negative spores (grey) at different rounds of propagation. NS, not significant.c, The positive fraction as measured by FACS increases over time.d, The fitness index, as calculated by multiplying the positive fraction fromc with the germination success fromb.e, Bacteria-positive (B+) spores exhibit an increased level of delayed germinations compared to bacteria-negative (B) spores throughout the directed evolution experiment. Solid lines indicate mean; dashed lines indicate quartiles.n = 73 plates.P < 0.000000000001. In bd, for round 1,n = 1, round 3 and 7,n = 10, and round 10,n = 4 biological samples from one experiment. Inbd, data are presented as mean values ± s.d. In be, two-sided Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test.f, The bacterially produced rhizoxin precursor WF-1360F can be detected in the induced endosymbiosis.g, The compound rhizoxin can be detected in the induced endosymbiosis. Inf,g, plate extracts of all ten lines (L1–L10) from round 7 of the adaptive laboratory evolution experiment were analysed by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. The molecules are detected in all ten lines. Shown are the sections of the liquid chromatography retention times of the highest signal intensity form/z 610.337 (WF-1360F;f) andm/z 626.3323 (rhizoxin;g). a.u., arbitrary units.

Source Data

Induced rhizoxin production inRhizopus

We tested whether the incorporation ofM.rhizoxinica as a new endosymbiont within the non-host strain NH led to the transfer of the biosynthesis of natural products, analogous to the natural host–endosymbiont system. In the natural system,M.rhizoxinica produces macrocyclic polyketides such as WF-1360F, which can be modified byR.microsporus to form rhizoxin and other congeners29, and has been attributed to fitness advantages23,29,30,31. Rhizoxins are toxic to eukaryotic cells because they bind β-tubulin and interfere with microtubule formation43. The resistance of the fungus to rhizoxins is due to a single amino-acid substitution in β-tubulin that is present in most Mucorales, including both strains ofR.microsporus used in this study28. We tested for the production of rhizoxin in the induced endosymbiosis with liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. All extracts from plates of the ten evolution lines in round 7 contained rhizoxin congeners. Specifically, WF-1360F and rhizoxin were both found in all lines (Fig.3f,g). The detection of rhizoxin validates the transfer of a metabolic trait to strain NH, which does not naturally generate the natural product.

Verifying fitness in evolved symbiosis

To verify that the marked increase in fitness of the induced endosymbiosis was due to adaptative evolution, and to test whether one or both partners adapted, we carried out a crossover experiment. For the ancestral partners, we used the same starting stocks as for injection to commence the evolution experiment, and for the evolved partners, we chose the best-performing line after ten rounds of propagation (line 4). We isolated the bacterium from line 4 at the end of the evolution (BEvo) and reinjected it into the ancestral fungus (FAnc), and reciprocally injected the ancestral bacterium (BAnc) into the evolved fungus (FEvo; using a bacterium-free spore from the tenth round of line 4). In the first round directly after injection, both cross-pairings had a high germination success, with FAnc–BEvo at 66% ± 17% and FEvo–BAnc at 88% ± 5%. Thus, the germination success of FEvo–BAnc was similar to that of the evolved pair (88%) and significantly higher than that of the ancestral pair (39% ± 29%; Fig.4a). When we determined the positive fraction in the subsequent round, FEvo–BAnc exhibited a positive fraction of 51% ± 13% (Extended Data Table2). This is even higher than that of the evolved pair (29%), indicative of high fitness and suggesting the possibility of genomic adaptation of the fungus.

Fig. 4: Cross-injection experiments show that the induced endosymbiosis adapted throughout the evolution experiment.
figure 4

a, The evolved fungus in FEvo–BAnc leads to a higher germination success directly after injection compared to the unevolved fungus in FAnc–BAnc. Data are presented as mean values ± s.d. and compared using two-sided unpairedt-test with Welch’s correction.n = 3 biological samplesb, Flow cytometry plots of side scatter area (SSC-A) versus enhanced-GFP area (eGFP-A) show a reduced GFP intensity for the bacteria-positive spores from round 10 line 4 (evolved) compared to FAnc–BAnc spores. Gates illustrate the approximate gating strategy used to sort samples depicted inc,d, with the positive population being partitioned into low (L)-, medium (M)- and high (H)-GFP-signal fractions. Prior flow cytometry gating imposed size restrictions and selected for single spores (Methods).c, Bacterial load of ten spores per fraction for the low, medium and high fractions collected according to the gating strategy inb. There is a significant correlation between bacterial load and the signal intensity measured with flow cytometry. The bacterial load was determined by quantifying fluorescent voxels ofz-stack images of single spores. Data are presented as mean values ± s.d. and compared using a two-sided unpairedt-test with Welch correction;n = 10 technical replicates.P = 0.0000000022 (left);P = 0.000016 (right). Spores from the evolved pair (round 10 line 4) have a lower bacterial load than FAnc–BAnc (all fractions combined,P = 0.00000013, two-sided unpairedt-test with Welch correction,n = 30 technical replicates).d, A lower bacterial load correlates with a higher germination success for the ancestral pair (FAnc–BAnc). This correlation is not detected in the evolved pair, which overall has a lower bacterial load and higher germination success. Data are presented as mean values ± s.d. and compared using two-sided pairedt-test with individual variance and two-stage set-up.n = 3 biological samples.

Source Data

In addition to the increases in the positive fraction and germination success throughout the evolution experiment, we observed a lower intensity GFP signal in positive spores from the evolved pair versus the ancestral pair (Fig.4b). To determine whether the evolved spores contained fewer bacteria, or the bacteria present were expressing less GFP, we correlated the GFP signal obtained from FACS with bacterial load by collecting subpopulations of the positive population (Fig.4b) and microscopically assessed the bacterial volume in the spores (Methods, Determination of bacterial load). Spores from lower-intensity gates had a lower bacterial volume than spores from higher-intensity gates (Fig.4c and Extended Data Fig.2), correlating high GFP intensity as measured by FACS with a higher bacterial load. To evaluate whether the bacterial load influences the ability of the spores to germinate, we determined the germination success of these populations (Fig.4d). In the ancestral pair, we found that spores from the fraction with a lower bacterial load had a higher germination success than the spores with a high bacterial load. In the evolved pair, all spores had a relatively low bacterial load compared to the ancestral pair. Comparing spores from the evolved pair with different levels of bacterial load, we still found a trend, but no significant correlation between bacterial load and germination success (Fig.4d). These findings suggest that a high bacterial load reduces the germination capacity of spores and that the induced endosymbiosis adapted to counteract this issue by reducing the bacterial load.

To test how the presence of bacteria affected the germination capacity of spores as they age, we examined the germination periodically over the course of 27 days. The germination success of spores devoid of bacteria remained relatively constant during this time frame (Extended Data Fig.3). By contrast, the germination success of bacteria-containing spores for both FAnc–BAnc and the evolved pair decreased substantially over time from more than 50% to below 5% after about a month, suggesting that the presence of bacteria takes a continuous toll on the spores.

Genetic changes of symbiotic partners

Next we analysed whether the phenotypic adaptations in the evolution experiment correlated with genetic changes in the evolved populations. We carried out de novo hybrid genome assembly using both long- and short-read sequencing data to assemble a reference genome for strain NH from the start of the adaptive evolution experiment. Short-read sequencing was used to track changes at several rounds of the experiment (Fig.3a) for both the fungus and the bacteria. In the bacteria, we did not detect any mutational changes throughout the evolution experiment. In the fungus, we identified a total of 9 different mutations in four different lines that had an allele frequency of at least 50% (Extended Data Fig.4a). Four mutations were detected in the fittest line, line 4, in which we tracked genetic changes for each passage. The relative frequency of reads carrying the mutation increased sharply towards the end of the experiment and coincided with the increase in the fitness index observed in line 4 (Fig.5a). We further examined whether the high fitness of the FEvo–BAnc pairings correlated with the identified mutations and found all four mutations in all three injected FEvo germlings. In two of three germlings, the mutations occurred with a high frequency of 85–100% of reads and in one germling the frequency was considerably lower with only 18–35% of reads (note that asexual spores ofRhizopus are multinucleate44). However, in that germling another mutation was found in 61% of reads (Extended Data Fig.4b). This fifth mutation could be detected in the line 4 population from round 6 onwards, but did not reach the frequency threshold of 50% (Extended Data Table3). The function of the targeted genes remains speculative. Annotations with InterPro45 and interaction predictions with STRING46 suggest that they might be linked to endocytosis, whereas in other lines transcription, translation, mitochondrial maintenance and ion transport may have been affected (Extended Data Table4). Together, the findings of the sequence analysis confirmed that genomic changes occurred during the adaptive evolution experiment on the host side rather than in the endosymbiont.

Fig. 5: The increased fitness and stability of the evolved endosymbiosis correlates with genetic changes in the fungal population.
figure 5

a, Four mutations in line 4 became prevalent in the host population during the adaptive evolution experiment, correlating with the increase in the fitness index. The graph depicts in solid lines on the lefty axis the relative frequency of reads with the corresponding mutations compared to the reference sequence. The dashed line on the righty axis depicts the fitness index of line 4 over the course of the experiment. Mutations reaching more than 50% relative frequency are shown. ‘del**’ indicates deletion of two base pairs (CGG>C).b, The evolved endosymbiosis is more stable than the ancestral endosymbiosis (FAnc–BAnc) in the absence of artificial selection. The graph shows in colour the fraction of bacteria-positive spores in the absence of artificial selection by FACS, and in grey the predicted positive fraction based on a mathematical model. The model uses the germination success and fraction of bacteria-positive and bacteria-negative spores to predict the fraction of bacteria-positive spores over rounds of propagation in the absence of selection. The upper dotted line indicates the threshold for propagation and diluting out (1/100,000); the lower dotted line indicates the detection limit (1/1,000,000). Values measured as 0 positive fraction are not shown on the logarithmic plot. Data are presented as mean values ± s.d. ofn = 3 biological samples.

Source Data

Stability of evolved endosymbiosis

In the adaptive laboratory evolution experiment described above, we exerted a strict positive selection pressure using FACS. In nature, the selection pressure could stem from the bacterially transferred metabolic traits, in this case rhizoxin production26,31. However, our initial characterizations of the induced endosymbiosis have also shown substantial costs associated with bacterial occupation, which led to an initially low fitness of the endosymbiosis (Fig.3d). We therefore reasoned that the induced endosymbiosis would be quickly lost in the absence of positive selection, but would persist for longer after adaptation and mitigation of some of the fitness costs.

To test the stability of the endosymbiosis, we experimentally measured the positive fraction over five rounds of propagation without positive selection and compared the data to a simple mathematical model predicting the fraction of bacteria-positive spores over time. Parameters for the mathematical model were based on measured values of the starting point, namely, the germination success and the initial positive fraction, which we considered to be the most determining factors. For the experiment, positively sorted spores were plated according to the standard conditions in the evolution experiment. Thereafter, 100,000 spores were collected for further cultivation without selecting for bacterial colonization, while simultaneously measuring the positive fraction (Fig.5b). With the ancestral pair, positive spores diluted out within a single round to below the threshold for propagation (<1/100,000) but were still detectable (>1/1,000,000), which was even faster than the model predicted. For the evolved pair, however, the endosymbiosis was maintained for a longer time as positive spores diluted out after four to five rounds at the rate that was predicted by the model. This supports the earlier finding that adaptive evolution increased the stability of the induced endosymbiosis, and that the positive fraction and germination success are valid predictors of the fitness of the system.

Discussion

The emergence of new endosymbioses remains a challenge to observe and study. We have developed an experimental system that allows real-time investigation of the initial steps in the association of a fungal host with an intracellular bacterium. Such encounters are thought to occur frequently in nature, but will be predominantly unstable and transient3,4,11,47. The direct implantation allows monitoring of the immediate reactions of pairs with varying degrees of preadaptation, and decoupled from hyphal entry.

The implantation ofE.coli intoR.microsporus strains EH and NH resulted in the collapse of the system in a single fungal generation, underscoring the expected instability of new endosymbiotic pairings4. AlthoughE.coli rapidly divided in the cytosol (Fig.2a), it was unable to colonize the spores ofR.microsporus, which represents an evolutionary dead end for endosymbiogenesis. The fungus entrapped densely growingE.coli through induced septum formation (Fig.2a and Supplementary Video 5), probably due to recognition by its innate immune system, which is not well understood at present42,48. However,E.coli at low densities were not consistently sealed off, suggesting thatR.microsporus lacks the specificity to clear low-abundance bacteria in its cytosol. This observation implies thatE.coli might be more likely to be vertically transmitted if it grew slower36 and/or spread throughout the entire mycelium. The pairing illustrates the necessity for sufficient preadaptation for endosymbiogenesis, as otherwise natural selection cannot begin to take effect.

By contrast,M.rhizoxinica implanted into the non-hostR.microsporus strain NH propagated and dispersed in the fungal hyphae without apparent harm to the fungus and without inducing septum formation (Fig.2b and Supplementary Video 7). The bacterium reached a subset of spores (Fig.2c,d), some of which germinated, allowing vertical inheritance (Fig.2e). We speculate that the bacteria are actively transported along the microtubules, potentially by hitchhiking vesicle transport41. This might help the bacteria to spread in the mycelium (Supplementary Videos 2,3 and8) and to reach sites where spores form. The colonization of spores in strain NH was notable, because this fungal strain has not evolved to couple spore formation to bacterial presence26. Despite the demonstrated vertical inheritance, the endosymbiosis is rapidly lost in the absence of positive selection (Fig.5b), probably owing to competition by bacteria-free spores and the observed costs of delayed germination and reduced germination success of colonized spores (Fig.3b,e). These results are consistent with resource exploitation by the endosymbiont, an effect previously observed in insects17,18.

When subjected to a strong selection pressure using FACS, the artificially induced endosymbiosis became successively more stable, as evidenced by the slower loss of the endosymbiont when selection pressure was lifted (Fig.5b). Two major phenotypic factors contributing to this enhancement were an increased fraction of positive spores and ‘recovery’ of the compromised germination success (Fig.3b,c). Our cross-validation implantations suggested that adaptation of the fungus was the main contributor to stabilization. This finding was substantiated by genome analyses, which showed enriched mutations in the fungal population but not the bacterial one (Fig.5a and Extended Data Fig.4a). This observation is in contrast to findings made in insects, in which the bacterial genome adapts faster49. In the fungal coenocytic system, each nuclear duplication can increase host diversity, possibly allowing the fungus to adapt rapidly.

The underexplored genome of this basal fungus makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions about which molecular mechanisms were critical to adapt to the induced endosymbiosis, and additional epigenetic effects on either the host or endosymbiont side cannot be ruled out. Furthermore, genetic changes based on rearrangements or larger deletions or duplications may be missed by short-read sequencing. However, several genes affected by mutations may be involved in the regulation of transcription and translation, and in endocytosis (Extended Data Table4). Although the exact mechanisms remain unclear, we could show phenotypically that the system evolved to increase the number of spores with the bacterium, and we identified reduced bacterial load in the spores as an important factor for the increased germination success (Fig.4b–d).

Our findings indicate thatM.rhizoxinica is largely compatible with non-hostR.microsporus strain NH, but maintaining the endosymbiont requires selection pressure. In the natural endosymbiotic pair, the costs for harbouring the bacterium are probably offset by benefits to the fungus, such as co-production of rhizoxin23,31. We found that the implanted bacterium produced WF-1360F withinR.microsporus strain NH. We also detected rhizoxin, which is produced whenR.microsporus epoxidizes WF-1360F congeners29, indicating that the ability to modify WF-1360F is not exclusively present inR.microsporus strains that evolved to harbourM.rhizoxinica. The production of rhizoxin by strain NH demonstrates that metabolic capabilities can be transferred to new organisms by artificially inducing an endosymbiosis through implantation and subsequent selection.

In summary, we have successfully adopted the FluidFM technology to implant live bacteria into a fungus. This single-cell approach enables real-time imaging of ensuing interactions and to study the prerequisites for endosymbiogenesis even in short-lived and unstable pairings. Combined with the high-throughput nature and sensitivity of FACS, rare vertical transmission events can be analysed and cultured under strict selection. We found that adaptive evolution increased the stability of the induced endosymbiosis despite high initial costs. The ability to initiate endosymbioses and to explore the boundary conditions for stable inheritance advances synthetic approaches towards biotechnologically relevant designer endosymbionts and sheds light on the evolutionary forces shaping endosymbiogenesis.

Methods

Strains and standard culturing methods

The strains and chemicals used are listed in Supplementary Tables1 and2. E. coli K-12 BW25113 pDGUV-GFP50 was cultured in Luria–Bertani broth (Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 100 µg ml−1 carbenicillin (Roth).R.microsporus strain NH isR.microsporus CBS 631.82;R.microsporus strain EH isR.microsporus ATCC62417.M.rhizoxinica HKI-0454 andR.microsporus were cultured as previously reported42 at 28 °C.M.rhizoxinica was fluorescently labelled with cytosolic GFP using pBBR-P12-GFP51.R.microsporus was grown on potato dextrose agar (ThermoFisher) at 28 °C with 20 µg ml−1 gentamicin. Respective antibiotics for plasmid retention were used as required for the culture of bacteria in all experiments, including the growth of bacteria inside the fungus, in which case, additionally, gentamicin was used to prevent extracellular bacterial growth.

Bacterial injections with FluidFM

The basic setup of the instruments, FluidFM probe processing steps, probe cleaning and probe coating were as previously described36, but the pressure was controlled with a FlowEZ 7000 (Fluigent), in the range of 0–7,000 mbar, using an AT550-9L compressor (WenLing) as pressure source. The probe apex was sharpened with a Helios 5UX DualBeam focused ion beam scanning electron microscope (ThermoFisher) as described previously36,52, but to a new shape that resulted in a sharp double point, as shown in Fig.1, by targeting the probe from the front and shaping a centred point with a 60° central angle. The cantilevers of the used probes had a nominal stiffness of 1.6 N m−1. The fungal sample was prepared by seeding spores in 50-mm WillCo glass-bottom dishes (WillCo Well) and adding 4 ml potato dextrose broth (PDB) medium (ThermoFisher) containing 34 µg ml−1 chloramphenicol, incubating at room temperature for 14–16 h, washing 1–3 times with 4 ml PDB, depending on germling concentration, exchanging the medium for protoplasting mix (to soften but not completely disintegrate the cell wall; 1.6 g Cellulase Onozuka R10 (Duchefa Biochemie), 40 mg chitinase (Merck), 40 ml iced MMB (0.5 M mannitol, 0.05 M maleate pH 5.5), filtered through a 0.22-µm syringe filter), and incubating for another 3–5 h at room temperature. If germlings were too dense, the sample supernatant was filtered through a 0.22-µm syringe filter. TheE.coli sample was grown in a 10-ml culture in a baffled shake flask overnight at 37 °C, washed three times in Hepes2 buffer (10 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4), and adjusted to an optical density of 2 at 600 nm. TheM.rhizoxinica sample was grown in a 2-ml culture in a 12-ml culturing tube for 3 to 5 days at 28 °C and prepared like theE. coli culture. Bacterial suspensions (15 µl) were pipetted into the reservoir of the FluidFM probe. The probe was moved towards the glass surface (z = 0 µm) beside the targeted germling and then retracted to az-value of +8 to +10 µm. The injection site of the germling was chosen on the basis of direct proximity to the glass surface, preferring thick germtube portions. As force-controlled puncturing was not possible owing to the softness of the probe, the germling was punctured by advancing the probe by 10 µm (corresponding to a nominalz-value of +1 µm to −2 µm), holding this position for 5 s and retracting to az-value of +1 to +3 µm. Successful puncturing of the germling could be monitored with wide-field illumination by observing cytoplasmic flow. Immediately following puncture of the germling, the microfluidic system was pressurized with 3–4 bar, stopping turgor-induced backflow into the probe. Subsequently, the pressure was increased to 6.5 bar until liquid flow into the germling was noticed, and then quickly reduced to 3–4 bar to prevent bursting of the germling. Injection of bacteria was confirmed by switching to the fluorescence channel, and then the pressure was slowly reduced to 0 mbar to allow recovery of the germling. The injected germling was isolated to a fresh dish filled with recovery medium (3.8 ml MMB, 1 ml PDB, 160 µl 4 M sorbitol) after 3–10 min, or after the germling recommenced growth. Isolation was carried out by lifting the FluidFM and exchanging the sample dish for the recovery dish, with the germling sticking to the probe. Recovery of the germling and the ensuing dynamics were visualized using time-lapse andz-stack images in the wide-field and the fluorescence channels. Some of the injections were carried out with the addition of 1:1,000 calcofluor white (Merck) in the protoplasting mix and recovery medium to visualize the cell wall. Germlings were grown in recovery medium overnight and then detached from the probe using overpressure, lifting of the FluidFM and scraping with a plastic pipette tip. Mycelium was then transferred to a potato dextrose agar plate and incubated at 28 °C.

Spore collection

Spores were collected 6 ± 1 days after injection or plating from spores. Spore solution (8.5% NaCl, 1% Tween 20) was added to plates (16 ml for square plates; 12 ml for round plates), and the spores were thoroughly detached using a spatula. The remaining mycelium was clumped up and gently pressed with the spatula to release the spore solution from the mycelium. The spore solution was filtered through a 10-µm CellTrics filter (Sysmex). Spores were washed three times with 1 ml Hepes2 (relative centrifugal force of 8,000; 2 min) and stored at 4 °C overnight for FACS, or in 50% glycerol at −20 °C (for working stocks) or −80 °C (for long-term storage).

Flow cytometry and cell sorting

Analysis and sorting of spores were conducted at the ETH Flow Cytometry Core Facility on a FACSAria Fusion BSL2 cell sorter (BD). Single spores were selected using SSC-A–FSC-A and FSC-H–FSC-A gates. Colonization by bacteria was checked using an SSC-A–eGFP-A gate. (See Supplementary Fig.1 for the gating strategy). For samples for which autofluorescence was suspected to complicate the positioning of the positive gate, an mCherry-A versus PerCP–Cy5-5-A channel was used to check for autofluorescence but was not included in the gating. For determination of the fraction of positive spores, 100,000 to 1,000,000 spores were analysed depending on the size of the fraction. For bulk sorting, spores were sorted into 1.5-ml Eppendorf tubes. For determination of germination success, single spores were sorted into 96-well plates containing 125 µl PDB + 34 µg ml−1 chloramphenicol per well. For verification of positive gates, bulk-sorted spores were intermittently checked under the microscope. Collected data were analysed using FlowJo v10 software (BD). For sorting of high, medium and low fractions of positive spores, gates were set qualitatively in the positive population as illustrated in Fig.4b.

Determination of germination success

Single-spore-sorted 96-well plates were incubated at 28 °C and checked visually with a Zeiss SteREO Discovery.V8 microscope (Zeiss) for the appearance of a germling. Per sample, three plates of positive spores and one plate of negative spores were sorted. In round 1 of the adaptive laboratory evolution experiment, five positive plates were sorted per sample. Germlings were counted 1 day and 2 days after sorting, after which point there are no new germlings to be discovered. For positive plates, five germlings were checked microscopically on day 1 to confirm the presence of fluorescent bacteria. If a germling could not be confirmed to have endobacteria, five more germlings were checked. No samples failed this control by having more than 20% of germlings without easily detected endobacteria. To calculate the percentage of delayed germinations, the percentage of germlings not detected on day 1 but detected on day 2 was calculated (with 100% corresponding to the number of germlings detected on day 2).

Bacterial isolation

For isolation ofM.rhizoxinica fromR.microsporus, 50 ml MGYM9 + 34 µg ml−1 chloramphenicol was inoculated with spores in a 500-ml baffled shake flask and incubated with shaking at 100 r.p.m. for 5–7 days. Build-up of mycelium on the wall was periodically flushed off by gentle shaking and tilting by hand. Once the medium became turbid, an inoculation loop was inserted in the medium, avoiding mycelial clumps and used for streaking out on agar plates. Plates were checked daily for 3 days and growing fungus was cut out if detected. Plates with bacterial colonies were further cultivated according to standard protocols and were used to make cryogenic stocks. Alternatively, a 2-µm syringe filter (Merck) was used to separate bacteria from mycelium and spores, and the filtrate was used for further cultivation in liquid.

Adaptive laboratory evolution experiment

For the evolution experiment, spores collected in the first round after injection were sorted for determination of germination success, and the remaining spores were bulk sorted for positive spores. The positive spores were split into 10 equal lines, resulting in approximately 300 spores per line. Thereafter, the ten lines were kept separate. The germination success and the fraction of positive spores were determined in every round for every line, and at every round after round 1, some positively and negatively sorted spores were cryopreserved, and bacteria were isolated from 10,000 positively sorted spores (approximately 300 for round 1). The product of the positive fraction and the germination success was calculated to give the fitness index, indicating the percentage of spores that would yield bacteria-populated germlings for the start of a next round without selection. Plating for the evolution experiment was carried out on 120 × 120 mm square Petri dishes (Greiner) to increase the available surface area. Spores to be plated were taken up in 100 µl of buffer, which was pipetted into five parallel lines with equal spacing on the plate. Standard spread plating for high spore numbers had previously proved to lead to inconsistent spore formation. From round 2 on, high densities of spores could be plated for the next round as the fraction of positive spores increased. For making round 3 plates, the highest number of spores was seeded, up to 830,000 spores per plate, whereas for rounds 4 and 5 the numbers varied slightly around 100,000, and from thereon 100,000 were used for all rounds and lines. The number of seeded spores is shown in the Source Data for Fig.3a. After round 7, only the three best-performing lines according to the fitness index were grown individually (lines 2, 4 and 7), whereas the other seven lines were pooled to line P by mixing equal amounts of positive spores. A scheme indicating the population sizes of spores and the pooling regime can be found in Fig.3a.

Detection of rhizoxin

A total of 10,000 positively sorted spores per line from round 7 were plated. Strain EH colonized byM.rhizoxinica, the axenic strain NH and a liquid culture ofM.rhizoxinica served as controls. Plates were grown for 11 days and extracted with 50 ml ethyl acetate with shaking at 100 r.p.m. overnight at 28 °C. The organic phase was separated, dried with sodium sulfate, filtered through paper filter, and evaporated with a rotary vacuum evaporator. Samples were taken up in 1 ml acetonitrile, centrifuged at 20,000g for 10 min and 800 µl of the supernatant was stored at −80 °C until liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) analysis. LC separation was carried out with a Thermo Ultimate 3000 UHPLC system (Thermo Scientific) using a C18 reversed-phase column (Kinetex XB-C18 column, particle size 1.7 µm, pore size 100 Å; dimensions 50 mm × 2.1 mm, Phenomenex). Solvent A was 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in water and solvent B was 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile at a flow rate of 500 µl min−1. Solvent B was varied as follows: 0 min, 25%; 3 min, 90%; 5 min, 90%; 5.3 min, 25%; subsequently, the column was equilibrated for 2 min at the initial condition. The injection volume was 2 µl.

MS-product reaction monitoring analysis was carried out with a Thermo QExactive plus instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in the positive Fourier transform mass spectrometry mode. MS level 1 scans were carried out with a mass resolution of 35,000 (m/z = 200) and MS level 2 scans were carried out with a mass resolution of 17,500. Parent ions were isolated atm/z 594.34, 610.337, 612.3531, 626.3323 and 628.348 with unit resolution and fragmented by high-energy C-trap collision dissociation applying a normalized collision energy of 28 eV. A heated electrospray ionization probe was used with the following source parameters: vaporizer temperature, 380 °C; sheath gas, 50; auxiliary gas, 20; sweep gas, 0; RF level, 50.0; capillary temperature, 275 °C. See Supplementary Fig.2 for relevant spectra.

Genomics

For the generation of sequencing samples ofM.rhizoxinica, bacteria were grown according to standard culturing conditions after isolation from the respective time point (Methods, Bacterial isolation), and 4 ml of sample adjusted to an optical density of 1 at 600 nm were pelleted by spinning at a relative centrifugal force of 11,000 for 1 min. Genomic DNA was prepared using the MasterPure DNA Purification Kit (LGC). Genomic DNA was sent on dry ice to BMKGene (Biomarker Technologies) for further processing.

For generation of sequencing samples ofR.microsporus, mycelium was grown in 500 ml malt extract broth (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in 2-l shake flasks for Illumina sequencing or in 1.5-l malt extract broth in 5-l shake flasks for PacBio sequencing at 37 °C for 5 days, with the addition of gentamycin and chloramphenicol. The mycelium was then filtered on a 110-mm filter paper and washed thoroughly with double-distilled H2O and for Illumina samples additionally with 150 ml of 70% ethanol. The mycelium was then removed from the filter paper, packed into a 50- ml screw cap tube and frozen in liquid nitrogen. The samples were then sent to BMKGene (Biomarker Technologies) for further processing.

For genome assembly ofR.microsporus CBS 631.82, Pacbio HiFi sequencing with RS II produced a total of 3,867,257,442 base pairs (bp) in 353,300 reads of average length 10.9 kilobases and average quality score 30.3. The reads were assembled with Flye (v2.9.2)53 with the --pacbio-hifi flag, resulting in 118 contigs of total length 55,743,399 bp with an N50 (the shortest contig of the set of the largest contigs making up 50% of the assembly) of 1,370,944 bp. BUSCO (v5.4.7)54 was used to check the quality of the assembly, using the lineage dataset mucorales_odb10, giving the following result: C (complete): 97.5%, S (single-copy): 5.1%, D (duplicated): 92.4%, F (fragmented): 1.7%, M (missing): 0.8%,n (number of genes): 2,449. Thus, although nearly complete, the genome also seems to be largely duplicated. The assembly was gene-called with BRAKER (v3.0.6)55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62, using the —fungus flag, and then functionally annotated with eggNOG-mapper (v2.1.12)63 using the option --target_taxa Fungi. BUSCO reported a slightly improved completeness for the called genes: C: 99.8% [S: 1.4%, D: 98.4%], F: 0.1%, M: 0.1%, n: 2,449.

For calling mutations from the adaptive evolution experiment forR.microsporus andM.rhizoxinica, the short-read Illumina sequences provided by BMK were used. The resulting raw reads were cleaned by removing adaptor sequences, low-quality-end trimming and removal of low-quality reads using BBTools v38.18 (https://sourceforge.net/projects/bbmap/). The commands used for quality control can be found on the Methods in Microbiomics web page (https://methods-in-microbiomics.readthedocs.io/en/latest/preprocessing/preprocessing.html). Single nucleotide polymorphisms were called using two different tools—Snippy and bcftools64. For variant-calling with bcftools, reads were first aligned to the PacBio assembly ofR.microsporus CBS 631.82 or to theM.rhizoxinica reference genome (GCF_000198775.1) using BWA-MEM v0.7 (ref.65). Duplicate reads were marked and removed using GATK4 v4.2 (MarkDuplicates)66. Variants were called using the bcftools call command. Single nucleotide polymorphism calls were validated by comparing results obtained by two independent tools. All the variants that were detected in the ancestral sample were filtered out from all of the evolved samples using bcftools-isec to investigate variants that arose during the evolution experiment. The resulting VCF files were filtered using bcftools with the following criteria: -Ov -sLowQual -g5 -G10 -e ‘QUAL < 200 || DP4[2] < 3 || DP4[3] < 3 || (DP4[2] + DP4[3])/sum(DP4) < 0.1 || MQ < 50’. Each variant call produced by each of the tools was manually checked by analysing the read alignments at variant positions using samtools pileup. Mutations were annotated using SnpEff67 and InterProScan45. STRING was used to identify putative biological processes by searching for interactions on the basis of the closest-related genes for fungi found in the STRING database46.

Fitness without selection pressure

Spores for round 0 were first collected from a plate grown according to the standard conditions from the adaptive laboratory evolution experiment. For this, spores from a fresh FAnc–BAnc injection plate were bulk sorted and 100,000 positive spores were plated. For FEvo–BAnc, frozen positive spores from an injection plate were grown and then 100,000 positive spores were plated; for FEvo–BEvo, frozen spores from the evolution experiment from round 10 line 4 were grown and then 100,000 positive spores were plated. From these plates, spores of round 0 were collected. Then 100,000 spores were bulk sorted gating only for single spores but disregarding the GFP signal intensity of the spores and used for subsequent rounds. Every round, 1,000,000 spores per sample were analysed to determine the fraction of positive spores. The endosymbiosis was considered washed out once the positive fraction fell below the threshold of 1/100,000 spores, at which no positive spore is expected to be plated for the next round. The experiment was stopped after round 5. The theoretical trajectory of the positive fraction was calculated using the following formula:

$${p}_{x}=({p}_{x-1}\times g\times {p}_{0})/({p}_{x-1}\times g+[1-{p}_{x-1}]\times e),$$

wherep is the positive fraction;x is the round for which the positive fraction is being determined;g is the germination success of positive spores as measured in round 0;e is the germination success of negative spores derived from the long-term average from the evolution experiment (69%); andp0 is the positive fraction measured in round 0 to describe how many spores formed by bacteria-positive germlings are again bacteria positive.

Determination of bacterial load

Spores sorted for high, medium and low intensity were imaged in the wide-field and GFP channel to createz-stacks. Overlays of 10 spores per population per sample are shown in Extended Data Fig.2a,b and served as visual confirmation for the correlation of GFP intensity as measured by FACS and bacterial population size. Contrast and brightness were kept the same. The volume of voxels considered to be bacteria was calculated using Matlab2018a (Mathworks) using sections of published code36. To gauge the appropriate threshold, the three-dimensional rendering of the resulting voxel cloud was visually inspected, and the diameter of single particles was checked. An example of the resulting three-dimensional rendering of samples is shown in Extended Data Fig.2c.

Spore longevity

Samples were grown as described in the section entitled Fitness without selection pressure. Single spores were sorted into 96-well plates with 75 µl of Hepes2 + 34 µg ml−1 chloramphenicol in each well. Per sample, 15 plates with negative spores and 15 plates with positive spores were sorted. Plates were then incubated at 16 °C. One day before the nominal time point, three plates per condition were activated by adding 125 µl of PDB + 34 µg ml−1 chloramphenicol to each well and incubating at 28 °C.

Statistical analyses

Statistical tests indicated in the figure legends were run with GraphPad Prism v9.0.0.

Images, videos, plots and figures

Images and videos were edited using Fiji68 for contrast,z-stacks, time stamps, overlays and scale bars, as indicated in the respective sections of theMethods and figure legends. Videos were cut together and labelled using iMovie v10.4 (Apple). Plots were generated using GraphPad Prism 9. Figures were assembled and edited using Adobe Illustrator 2020. Illustrations for Fig.1 were created withBioRender.com.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

Genomic data are available in the European Nucleotide Archive under the accession numberPRJEB76713. For an ID key, see Supplementary Table3. FACS data and analyses, statistical analyses and plots, LC–MS/MS data and raw images for all figures and Supplementary Videos 14 are available on Zenodo athttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12189101 (ref. 69). Raw images for Supplementary Videos 58 are available on Zenodo athttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12518583 (ref. 70). The STRING46 database is available athttps://string-db.org/Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

The code used in this publication is described in theMethods and is available on Zenodo athttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13309607 (ref. 71).

References

  1. Martin, W. & Müller, M. The hydrogen hypothesis for the first eukaryote.Nature392, 37–41 (1998).

    ADS CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wernegreen, J. J. Endosymbiosis.Curr. Biol.22, 555–561 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kobayashi, D. Y. & Crouch, J. A. Bacterial/fungal interactions: from pathogenes to mutualistic endosymbionts.Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.47, 63–82 (2009).

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Meaney, R. S., Hamadache, S., Soltysiak, M. P. M. & Karas, B. J. Designer endosymbionts: converting free-living bacteria into organelles.Curr. Opin. Syst. Biol.24, 41–50 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brockhurst, M. A., Cameron, D. D. & Beckerman, A. P. Fitness trade-offs and the origins of endosymbiosis.PLoS Biol.22, e3002580 (2024).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Douglas, A. E. How multi-partner endosymbioses function.Nat. Rev. Microbiol.14, 731–743 (2016).

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Keeling, P. J. The number, speed, and impact of plastid endosymbioses in eukaryotic evolution.Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.64, 583–607 (2013).

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Scherlach, K. & Hertweck, C. Chemical mediators at the bacterial-fungal interface.Annu. Rev. Microbiol.74, 267–290 (2020).

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brown, S. A., Palmer, K. L. & Whiteley, M. Revisiting the host as a growth medium.Nat. Rev. Microbiol.6, 657–666 (2008).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Eisenreich, W., Rudel, T., Heesemann, J. & Goebel, W. Persistence of intracellular bacterial pathogens—with a focus on the metabolic perspective.Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.10, 615450 (2021).

    PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Libby, E., Kempes, C. P. & Okie, J. G. Metabolic compatibility and the rarity of prokaryote endosymbioses.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA120, e2206527120 (2023).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Zachar, I. & Boza, G. Endosymbiosis before eukaryotes: mitochondrial establishment in protoeukaryotes.Cell. Mol. Life Sci.77, 3503–3523 (2020).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. McCutcheon, J. P., Boyd, B. M. & Dale, C. The life of an insect endosymbiont from the cradle to the grave.Curr. Biol.29, R485–R495 (2019).

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bennett, G. M. & Moran, N. A. Heritable symbiosis: the advantages and perils of an evolutionary rabbit hole.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA112, 10169–10176 (2015).

    ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Wernegreen, J. J. In it for the long haul: evolutionary consequences of persistent endosymbiosis.Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.47, 83–90 (2017).

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Keeling, P. J., McCutcheon, J. P. & Doolittle, W. F. Symbiosis becoming permanent: survival of the luckiest.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA112, 10101–10103 (2015).

    ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. McGraw, E. A., Merritt, D. J., Droller, J. N. & O’Neill, S. L.Wolbachia density and virulence attenuation after transfer into a novel host.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA99, 2918–2923 (2002).

    ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Nakayama, S. et al. Can maternally inherited endosymbionts adapt to a novel host? Direct costs ofSpiroplasma infection, but not vertical transmission efficiency, evolve rapidly after horizontal transfer intoD. melanogaster.Heredity114, 539–543 (2015).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Koga, R. et al. Single mutation makesEscherichia coli an insect mutualist.Nat. Microbiol.7, 1141–1150 (2022).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Su, Y. et al. Rational engineering of a synthetic insect-bacterial mutualism.Curr. Biol.32, 3925–3938 (2022).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Mehta, A. P. et al. Engineering yeast endosymbionts as a step toward the evolution of mitochondria.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA115, 11796–11801 (2018).

    ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Cournoyer, J. E. et al. Engineering artificial photosynthetic life-forms through endosymbiosis.Nat. Commun.13, 2254 (2022).

    ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Partida-Martinez, L. P. & Hertweck, C. Pathogenic fungus harbours endosymbiotic bacteria for toxin production.Nature437, 884–888 (2005).

    ADS CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Partida-Martinez, L. P. et al.Burkholderia rhizoxinica sp. nov. andBurkholderia endofungorum sp. nov., bacterial endosymbionts of the plant-pathogenic fungusRhizopus microsporus.Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.57, 2583–2590 (2007).

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lackner, G. et al. Global distribution and evolution of a toxinogenicBurkholderia-Rhizopus symbiosis.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.75, 2982–2986 (2009).

    ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Partida-Martinez, L. P., Monajembashi, S., Greulich, K. O. & Hertweck, C. Endosymbiont-dependent host reproduction maintains bacterial-fungal mutualism.Curr. Biol.17, 773–777 (2007).

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mondo, S. J. et al. Bacterial endosymbionts influence host sexuality and reveal reproductive genes of early divergent fungi.Nat. Commun.8, 1843 (2017).

    ADS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Schmitt, I. et al. Evolution of host resistance in a toxin-producing bacterial-fungal alliance.ISME J.2, 632–641 (2008).

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Scherlach, K., Busch, B., Lackner, G., Paszkowski, U. & Hertweck, C. Symbiotic cooperation in the biosynthesis of a phytotoxin.Angew. Chemie Int. Ed.51, 9615–9618 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Scherlach, K., Partida-Martinez, L. P., Danse, H. M. & Hertweck, C. Antimitotic rhizoxin derivatives from a cultured bacterial endosymbiont of the rice pathogenic fungusRhizopus microsporus.J. Am. Chem. Soc.128, 11529–11536 (2006).

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Richter, I. et al. Toxin-producing endosymbionts shield pathogenic fungus against micropredators.mBio13, e0144022 (2022).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Moebius, N., Üzüm, Z., Dijksterhuis, J., Lackner, G. & Hertweck, C. Active invasion of bacteria into living fungal cells.eLife3, e03007 (2014).

    PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Lastovetsky, O. A. et al. Lipid metabolic changes in an early divergent fungus govern the establishment of a mutualistic symbiosis with endobacteria.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA113, 15102–15107 (2016).

    ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Lastovetsky, O. A. et al. Molecular dialogues between early divergent fungi and bacteria in an antagonism versus a mutualism.mBio11, e02088-20 (2020).

    PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Meister, A. et al. FluidFM: combining atomic force microscopy and nanofluidics in a universal liquid delivery system for single cell applications and beyond.Nano Lett.9, 2501–2507 (2009).

    ADS CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gäbelein, C. G., Reiter, M. A., Ernst, C., Giger, G. H. & Vorholt, J. A. Engineering endosymbiotic growth ofE. coli in mammalian cells.ACS Synth. Biol.11, 3388–3396 (2022).

    PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Ernst, C. et al. DirectSalmonella injection into enteroid cells allows the study of host-pathogen interactions in the cytosol with high spatiotemporal resolution.PLoS Biol.22, e3002597 (2024).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Jackson, S. L. Microinjection of fungal cells: a powerful experimental technique.Can. J. Bot.73, 435–443 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Guillaume-Gentil, O. et al. Injection into and extraction from single fungal cells.Commun. Biol.5, 180 (2022).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Ferree, P. M. et al.Wolbachia utilizes host microtubules and dynein for anterior localization in theDrosophila oocyte.PLoS Pathog.1, e14 (2005).

    PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Christensen, J. R. & Reck-Peterson, S. L. Hitchhiking across kingdoms: cotransport of cargos in fungal, animal, and plant cells.Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.38, 155–178 (2022).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Richter, I. et al. Transcription activator-like effector protects bacterial endosymbionts from entrapment within fungal hyphae.Curr. Biol.33, 2646–2656 (2023).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Takahashi, M. et al. Studies on macrocyclic lactone antibiotics.J. Antibiot.40, 66–72 (1987).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Hawker, L. E. & Abbott, P. M. An electron microscope study of maturation and germination of sporangiospores of two species ofRhizopus.J. Gen. Microbiol.32, 295–298 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Paysan-Lafosse, T. et al. InterPro in 2022.Nucleic Acids Res.51, D418–D427 (2023).

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Szklarczyk, D. et al. The STRING database in 2023: protein-protein association networks and functional enrichment analyses for any sequenced genome of interest.Nucleic Acids Res.51, D638–D646 (2023).

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Goetz, M. et al. Microinjection and growth of bacteria in the cytosol of mammalian host cells.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA98, 12221–12226 (2001).

    ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Gaspar, M. L. & Pawlowska, T. E. Innate immunity in fungi: is regulated cell death involved?PLoS Pathog.18, e1010460 (2022).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Woolfit, M. et al. Genomic evolution of the pathogenicWolbachia strain, wMelPop.Genome Biol. Evol.5, 2189–2204 (2013).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Cormack, B. P., Valdivia, R. H. & Falkow, S. FACS-optimized mutants of the green fluorescent protein (GFP).Gene173, 33–38 (1996).

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Richter, I. et al. Deazaflavin metabolite produced by endosymbiotic bacteria controls fungal host reproduction.ISME J.18, wrae074 (2024).

  52. Gäbelein, C. G. et al. Mitochondria transplantation between living cells.PLoS Biol.20, e3001576 (2022).

    PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Kolmogorov, M., Yuan, J., Lin, Y. & Pevzner, P. A. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs.Nat. Biotechnol.37, 540–546 (2019).

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Manni, M., Berkeley, M. R., Seppey, M., Simão, F. A. & Zdobnov, E. M. BUSCO update: novel and streamlined workflows along with broader and deeper phylogenetic coverage for scoring of eukaryotic, prokaryotic, and viral genomes.Mol. Biol. Evol.38, 4647–4654 (2021).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Hoff, K. J., Lange, S., Lomsadze, A., Borodovsky, M. & Stanke, M. BRAKER1: unsupervised RNA-Seq-based genome annotation with GeneMark-ET and AUGUSTUS.Bioinformatics32, 767–769 (2016).

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Brůna, T., Hoff, K. J., Lomsadze, A., Stanke, M. & Borodovsky, M. BRAKER2: automatic eukaryotic genome annotation with GeneMark-EP+ and AUGUSTUS supported by a protein database.NAR Genomics Bioinform.3, lqaa108 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools.Bioinformatics25, 2078–2079 (2009).

    PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Barnett, D. W., Garrison, E. K., Quinlan, A. R., Strömberg, M. P. & Marth, G. T. Bamtools: a C++API and toolkit for analyzing and managing BAM files.Bioinformatics27, 1691–1692 (2011).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Lomsadze, A., Burns, P. D. & Borodovsky, M. Integration of mapped RNA-Seq reads into automatic training of eukaryotic gene finding algorithm.Nucleic Acids Res.42, e119 (2014).

    PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Ter-Hovhannisyan, V., Lomsadze, A., Chernoff, Y. O. & Borodovsky, M. Gene prediction in novel fungal genomes using an ab initio algorithm with unsupervised training.Genome Res.18, 1979–1990 (2008).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Stanke, M., Diekhans, M., Baertsch, R. & Haussler, D. Using native and syntenically mapped cDNA alignments to improve de novo gene finding.Bioinformatics24, 637–644 (2008).

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Stanke, M., Schöffmann, O., Morgenstern, B. & Waack, S. Gene prediction in eukaryotes with a generalized hidden Markov model that uses hints from external sources.BMC Bioinform.7, 62 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Cantalapiedra, C. P., Herņandez-Plaza, A., Letunic, I., Bork, P. & Huerta-Cepas, J. eggNOG-mapper v2: functional annotation, orthology assignments, and domain prediction at the metagenomic scale.Mol. Biol. Evol.38, 5825–5829 (2021).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Danecek, P. et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools.Gigascience10, giab008 (2021).

    PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform.Bioinformatics25, 1754–1760 (2009).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Poplin, R. et al. Scaling accurate genetic variant discovery to tens of thousands of samples. Preprint atbioRxivhttps://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/201178v3 (2018).

  67. Cingolani, P. et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome ofDrosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3.Fly6, 80–92 (2012).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis.Nat. Methods9, 676–682 (2012).

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Giger, G. H. Inducing novel endosymbioses by bacteria implantation into fungi.Zenodohttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12189101 (2024).

  70. Giger, G. H. Inducing novel endosymbioses by bacteria implantation into fungi.Zenodohttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12518583 (2024).

  71. Field, C. MicrobiologyETHZ/ggiger_endosymbioses_2024: publication.Zenodohttps://zenodo.org/records/13309608 (2024).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a European Research Council Advanced Grant (SYMBIOSES number 883077 to J.A.V.); the National Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR) Microbiomes, financed by the Swiss National Science Foundation (51NF40_180575) to S.S. and J.A.V.; and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy—EXC 2051—Project-ID 390713860, the SFB 1127 ChemBioSys—Project-ID 239748522 and the Leibniz Award to C.H. I.R. is grateful for financial support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement number 794343. We thank E. Sarajlic, P. Christen, the personnel of the Scientific Center for Optical and Electron Microscopy at ETH Zurich and the personnel of the Flow Cytometry Core Facility at ETH Zurich for support and technical assistance.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich.

Author information

Author notes
  1. Christoph G. Gäbelein

    Present address: Whitehead Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Microbiology, Department of Biology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Gabriel H. Giger, Chantal Ernst, Thomas Gassler, Christopher M. Field, Anna Sintsova, Patrick Kiefer, Christoph G. Gäbelein, Orane Guillaume–Gentil, Miriam Bortfeld-Miller, Shinichi Sunagawa, Markus Künzler & Julia A. Vorholt

  2. Department of Biomolecular Chemistry, Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology, HKI, Jena, Germany

    Ingrid Richter, Kirstin Scherlach & Christian Hertweck

  3. Laboratory of Biosensors and Bioelectronics, Institute for Biomedical Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Tomaso Zambelli

  4. Institute of Microbiology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany

    Christian Hertweck

  5. Cluster of Excellence Balance of the Microverse, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany

    Christian Hertweck

Authors
  1. Gabriel H. Giger

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chantal Ernst

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ingrid Richter

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Thomas Gassler

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Christopher M. Field

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  6. Anna Sintsova

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  7. Patrick Kiefer

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  8. Christoph G. Gäbelein

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  9. Orane Guillaume–Gentil

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  10. Kirstin Scherlach

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  11. Miriam Bortfeld-Miller

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  12. Tomaso Zambelli

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  13. Shinichi Sunagawa

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  14. Markus Künzler

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  15. Christian Hertweck

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  16. Julia A. Vorholt

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

G.H.G. and J.A.V. conceived the project. G.H.G., C.E., I.R., C.G.G., O.G.-G., M.K., C.H. and J.A.V. designed the study. G.H.G., C.E., C.G.G., T.Z., M.K. and O.G.-G. developed the injection protocol. G.H.G. carried out the injections, FACS measurements, adaptation characterization experiments and microscopy and analysed the data. G.H.G., T.G. and M.B.-M. carried out the adaptive laboratory evolution experiment and G.H.G. analysed the data. C.M.F., A.S., G.H.G. and S.S. acquired and analysed the genomics data. P.K. and G.H.G. carried out the LC–MS/MS measurements and P.K., K.S. and G.H.G. analysed the data. G.H.G. and C.G.G. processed FluidFM cantilevers. G.H.G. and J.A.V. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence toJulia A. Vorholt.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature thanks Laila Partida Martinez and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Plots showing data for all ten rounds of the adaptive laboratory evolution experiment for all ten lines.

Pale colored datapoints in rounds 1–3 indicate the expansion phase of the experiment under differing plating densities (see Methods and Extended Data Fig.4a). The increase in fitness in round 2 is likely due to the low-density plating conditions. Plots show the heterogeneity in increase of the fitness of the different lines and trend towards higher fitness. For round 8–10, only lines 2, 4, and 7, were continued as before, while line P was the pooled fraction of the other lines.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 2 Bacterial load assessment inside spores ofR. microsporus strain NH.

Panela andb show per column from left to right: a single z layer widefield image, a 2D sum of the GFP signal of a z stack in yellow, the overlay of the two signals. The different columns show 10 spores each from FACS-sorted spores from fractions with high, medium, and low GFP signal. Scale bar 10 µm. Panela shows spores from the unevolved partners. Panelb shows spores from the evolved partners. The microscopy data shows that lower FACS signal corresponds to a lower bacterial load. Bacteria from the evolved endosymbiosis show an elongated phenotype and generally a lower bacterial load. Panelc shows an example of the output for the computational analysis of bacterial volume used for Fig.5c. In red on black is the fluorescence signal used for the selection of the region of interest (same spore as Panel a, first column, third row). In purple on white is a pseudo 3D rendering of the generated output for visual confirmation. The calculated voxel number for this sample was 6247.

Extended Data Fig. 3 The germination rate of bacteria-positive spores drops faster over time than the germination rate of bacteria-negative spores.

The plot shows the germination rate of spores at timepoints after harvesting and incubating in Hepes2 at 16 °C on a logarithmic scale. Evolved spores stem from Round 10 Line 4. Data shown is from a single sample.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 4 Overview of the identified mutations in the adaptive laboratory evolution experiment.

a Scheme of mutations found in over 50% of reads throughout the adaptive evolution experiment (see also Fig.3a). Squares indicate where genomic DNA was extracted from the fungus and from reisolated bacteria. Colored stars indicate samples where the respective mutations is found in more than 50% of reads. The hexagon marks round 10 of line 4, the population with the highest final fitness index, which was used for phenotypic characterization and is referred to as “evolved” (positive spores), FEvo (negative spores), or BEvo (reisolated bacteria).b Graph showing the genotype of the mycelium formed after injecting an FEvo negative spore with BAnc bacteria, which showed a high fitness index. Shown are the fraction of reads showing the mutations for the four loci identified in panel a plus an additional 2 loci which showed differences to the reference in more than 30% of reads. Details to the frequency of these two mutations over the course of the experiment can be found in (Extended Data Table3) FEvo1 and FEvo3 appear to almost exclusively have the four previously identified mutations, whereas they are only partially present in FEvo2.

Source Data

Extended Data Table 1 The fraction of positive spores in samples ofR. microsporus strain NH after injection of GFP labelledM. rhizoxinica (FAnc–BAnc)
Extended Data Table 2 The fraction of positive spores in samples of FEvo–BAnc after propagation with standard conditions
Extended Data Table 3 The frequencies of two mutations detected in re-injected germlings of FEvo–BAnc throughout the evolution experiment in Line 4
Extended Data Table 4 Information about the mutations discovered in samples of the evolution experiment

Supplementary information

Supplementary Tables

Supplementary Tables 1–3.

Supplementary Fig. 1

The general gating strategy used for flow cytometry analyses and cell sorting. The complete dataset used in this study is available on Zenodo athttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12189101.

Supplementary Fig. 2

Key spectra for the detection of rhizoxin and WF-1360F in samples of the evolution experiment. The complete dataset acquired for this study is available on Zenodo athttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12189101.

Supplementary Video 1

The injection ofM. rhizoxinica intoR. microsporus strain EH. The video shows a montage ofz-stacks, time-lapse images and recordings of the computer screen used during experimentation. The images show in grey the bright-field signal overlaid in green with contrast-adjusted two-dimensional (2D) projection of thez-stack of the GFP signal or a single contrast-adjustedz-section of the GFP signal. The time after injection is indicated in the format hh:mm:ss. The injected bacteria can be seen to be mobile within the germling. After isolation into recovery medium, the injected compartment with multiple bacteria becomes inactive, but another compartment with a single bacterium continues to grow. The single bacterium can be observed to divide within the fungus.

Supplementary Video 2

Movement ofM. rhizoxinica withinR. microsporus EH. The video is an overlay of the bright-field image in grey and the GFP signal of a singlez-section in green. The time between frames is 7 s. The time is indicated in the format hh:mm:ss. The bulk flow in the hyphae can be observed through the collective motion of large cytosolic compounds. The bacteria can be observed to move bidirectionally with higher velocity than the bulk flow and both with and against the direction of bulk flow.

Supplementary Video 3

Movement ofM. rhizoxinica withinR. microsporus EH 2. The video is an overlay of the bright-field image in grey and the GFP signal of a singlez-section in yellow. The time is indicated in the format hh:mm:ss. The time between frames is 2.8 s and allows for finer resolution of bacterial motion in a densely populated hypha with little bulk flow. The bacteria can be observed to move bidirectionally.

Supplementary Video 4

The effect of dynein inhibition by treatment with ciliobrevin D on the transport ofM. rhizoxinica withinR. microsporus strain EH. The videos show an overlay of a single bright-field image in grey and a 2D projection of az-stack of the GFP signal in yellow. The time between frames is 10 s. The relative time is indicated in the format hh:mm:ss. The top row shows treatment with 40 µM ciliobrevin D; the bottom row shows treatment with dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) control. For ciliobrevin D, the middle video shows the germling right after ciliobrevin exposure for about 1 min in cilobrevin D-free medium. For the DMSO control, the middle video shows the germling in the treatment medium after 5 min of exposure. The right videos show the germlings after recovery from treatment, for cilobrevin D after 2 h, for DMSO after 5 min. Bacterial movement within the germling is strongly inhibited after treatment with ciliobrevin D, but is recovered in 2 h.

Supplementary Video 5

The injection ofE. coli intoR. microsporus strain EH. The video shows a montage ofz-stacks, time-lapse images and recordings of the computer screen used during experimentation. The images show in grey the bright-field signal overlaid in green with contrast-adjusted 2D projection of thez-stack of the GFP signal or a single contrast-adjustedz-section of the GFP signal. The time after injection is indicated in the format hh:mm:ss. The injected germling can be seen to recover turgor pressure lost during the injection, recommencing growth after about 1 h. The injected bacterium starts dividing with the fungus and disperses slowly following bulk flow of the hyphae. Septa formation around dense clusters ofE.coli limits the bacteria’s spread and leads to bacteria-free and bacteria-filled compartments. Compartments filled with bacteria become inactive and occasionally burst open.

Supplementary Video 6

The injection ofE. coli intoR. microsporus strain NH. The video shows a montage ofz-stacks and time-lapse images. The images show in grey the bright-field signal overlaid in yellow with contrast-adjusted 2D projection of thez-stack of the GFP signal or a single contrast-adjustedz-section of the GFP signal, and in blue a contrast-adjusted singlez-section or 2D projection of thez-stack of the calcofluor white signal. Calcofluor white selectively stains fungal cell wall components. The time after injection is indicated in the format hh:mm:ss. The injected germling can be seen to recover turgor pressure lost during the injection, recommencing growth after about 3.5 h. The injected bacterium starts dividing with the fungus and disperses slowly following bulk flow of the hypha. Septa formation around densely growingE. coli limits the bacteria’s spread and isolates the bacteria within a compartment that eventually bursts open.

Supplementary Video 7

The injection ofM. rhizoxinica intoR. microsporus strain NH. The video shows a montage ofz-stacks, time-lapse images and recordings of the computer screen used during experimentation. The images show in grey the bright-field signal overlaid in green with contrast-adjusted 2D projection of thez-stack of the GFP signal or a single contrast-adjustedz-section of the GFP signal. The time after injection is indicated in the format hh:mm:ss. In the beginning, the injection procedure can be followed with puncturing of the germling, high-pressure injection of bacteria, and the return to 0 bar pressure. One of the two injected bacteria can be seen to be mobile within the germling and to divide within the fungus. The fungus recommences growth after about 2 h.

Supplementary Video 8

Movement ofM. rhizoxinica withinR. microsporus NH. The video is an overlay of the bright-field image in grey and the GFP signal of a singlez-section in green. The time between frames is 7 s. The time is indicated in the format hh:mm:ss. The bulk flow in the hyphae can be observed through the collective motion of large cytosolic compounds. The bacteria can be observed to move bidirectionally with higher velocity than the bulk flow and both with and against the direction of bulk flow.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giger, G.H., Ernst, C., Richter, I.et al. Inducing novel endosymbioses by implanting bacteria in fungi.Nature635, 415–422 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08010-x

Download citation

This article is cited by

Download PDF

Associated content

Advertisement

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for theNature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox.Sign up for Nature Briefing

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp