Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature
  • Letter
  • Published:

CompleteIchthyornis skull illuminates mosaic assembly of the avian head

Naturevolume 557, pages96–100 (2018)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

The skull of living birds is greatly modified from the condition found in their dinosaurian antecedents. Bird skulls have an enlarged, toothless premaxillary beak and an intricate kinetic system that includes a mobile palate and jaw suspensorium. The expanded avian neurocranium protects an enlarged brain and is flanked by reduced jaw adductor muscles. However, the order of appearance of these features and the nature of their earliest manifestations remain unknown. The Late Cretaceous toothed birdIchthyornis dispar sits in a pivotal phylogenetic position outside living groups: it is close to the extant avian radiation but retains numerous ancestral characters1,2,3. Although its evolutionary importance continues to be affirmed3,4,5,6,7,8, no substantial new cranial material ofI. dispar has been described beyond incomplete remains recovered in the 1870s. Jurassic and Cretaceous Lagerstätten have yielded important avialan fossils, but their skulls are typically crushed and distorted9. Here we report four three-dimensionally preserved specimens ofI. dispar—including an unusually complete skull—as well as two previously overlooked elements from the Yale Peabody Museum holotype, YPM 1450. We used these specimens to generate a nearly complete three-dimensional reconstruction of theI. dispar skull using high-resolution computed tomography. Our study reveals thatI. dispar had a transitional beak—small, lacking a palatal shelf and restricted to the tips of the jaws—coupled with a kinetic system similar to that of living birds. The feeding apparatus of extant birds therefore evolved earlier than previously thought and its components were functionally and developmentally coordinated. The brain was relatively modern, but the temporal region was unexpectedly dinosaurian: it retained a large adductor chamber bounded dorsally by substantial bony remnants of the ancestral reptilian upper temporal fenestra. This combination of features documents that important attributes of the avian brain and palate evolved before the reduction of jaw musculature and the full transformation of the beak.

This is a preview of subscription content,access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals

Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription

9,800 Yen / 30 days

cancel any time

Subscription info for Japanese customers

We have a dedicated website for our Japanese customers. Please go tonatureasia.com to subscribe to this journal.

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to the full article PDF.

￥ 4,980

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Full 3D reconstruction of the skull ofI. dispar.
Fig. 2: Line drawings of the skull ofI. dispar.
Fig. 3: Relationships ofI. dispar and the origin of the avian beak.
Fig. 4: Derived brain shape and primitive temporal region ofI. dispar.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Huang, J. et al. A new ornithurine from the Early Cretaceous of China sheds light on the evolution of early ecological and cranial diversity in birds.PeerJ4, e1765 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Marsh, O. C. Notice of a new and remarkable fossil bird.Am. J. Sci.4 (third series), 344 (1872).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clarke, J. A. Morphology, phylogenetic taxonomy, and systematics ofIchthyornis andApatornis (Avialae: Ornithurae).Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist.286, 1–179 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Olson, S. L.Ichthyornis in the Cretaceous of Alabama.Wilson Bull.87, 103–105 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lucas, S. G. & Sullivan, R. M.Ichthyornis in the Late Cretaceous Mancos Shale (Juana Lopez Member), northwestern New Mexico.J. Paleontol.56, 545–547 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Parris, D. & Echols, J. The fossil birdIchthyornis in the Cretaceous of Texas.Tex. J. Sci.44, 201–212 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shimada, T. R. & Wilson, L. E. A new specimen of the Late Cretaceous bird, cf.Ichthyornis sp., from the Cenomanian of central Kansas, with comments on the size distribution ofIchthyornis in North America.Trans. Kans. Acad. Sci.119, 231–237 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gingerich, P. D. A new partial mandible ofIchthyornis.Condor74, 471–473 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chiappe, L. M. & Qingjin, M.Birds of Stone: Chinese Avian Fossils from the Age of Dinosaurs (Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Felice, R. N. & Goswami, A. Developmental origins of mosaic evolution in the avian cranium.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 555–560 (2018).

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mayr, G.Avian Evolution: the Fossil Record of Birds and its Paleobiological Significance (John Wiley & Sons, Oxford, 2016).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Gauthier, J. inThe Origin of Birds and the Evolution of Flight (Memoirs of the California Academy of Sciences 8) (ed. Padian, K.) 1–55 (California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, 1986).

  13. Zhou, Z. & Martin, L. D. Distribution of the predentary bone in Mesozoic ornithurine birds.J. Syst. Palaeontology9, 25–31 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bhullar, B.-A. S. et al. How to make a bird skull: major transitions in the evolution of the avian cranium, paedomorphosis, and the beak as a surrogate hand.Integr. Comp. Biol.56, 389–403 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. O’Connor, J. The trophic habits of early birds.Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2018.03.006 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zheng, X., O’Connor, J. K., Wang, X., Wang, Y. & Zhou, Z. Reinterpretation of a previously described Jehol bird clarifies early trophic evolution in the Ornithuromorpha.Proc. R. Soc. B285, 20172494 (2018).

  17. Hieronymus, T. L. & Witmer, L. M. Homology and evolution of avian compound rhamphothecae.Auk127, 590–604 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Baumel, J. J. et al.Handbook of Avian Anatomy: Nomina Anatomica Avium (Publications of the Nuttall Ornithological Club, No. 23) 2nd edn (Harvard Univ. Nuttal Ornithological, Cambridge, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Elzanowski, A. New observations on the skull ofHesperornis with reconstructions of the bony palate and otic region.Postilla207, 1–20 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bock, W. J. Kinetics of the avian skull.J. Morphol.114, 1–42 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Homberger, D. G. inThe Biology of the Avian Respiratory System (ed. Maina, J. N.) 27–97 (Springer, Cham, 2017).

  22. Martin, L. D. & Stewart, J. D. Teeth inIchthyornis (Class: Aves).Science195, 1331–1332 (1977).

    Article ADS CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dumont, M. et al. Synchrotron imaging of dentition provides insights into the biology ofHesperornis andIchthyornis, the “last” toothed birds.BMC Evol. Biol.16, 178 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jollie, M. T. The head skeleton of the chicken and remarks on the anatomy of this region in other birds.J. Morphol.100, 389–436 (1957).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zusi, R. L. inThe Skull, Volume 2: Patterns of Structural and Systematic Diversity (eds. Hanken, J. & Hall, B. K.) Ch. 8, 391–437 (Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1993).

  26. Chiappe, L. M., Norell, M. & Clark, J. A new skull ofGobipteryx minuta (Aves: Enantiornithes) from the Cretaceous of the Gobi Desert.Am. Mus. Novit.3346, 1–15 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bühler, P., Martin, L. D. & Witmer, L. M. Cranial kinesis in the Late Cretaceous birdsHesperornis andParahesperornis.Auk105, 111–122 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zusi, R. L. A functional and evolutionary analysis of rhynchokinesis in birds.Smithson. Contrib. Zool.395, 1–40 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gussekloo, S. W. & Bout, R. G. Cranial kinesis in palaeognathous birds.J. Exp. Biol.208, 3409–3419 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rauhut, O. W. M. New observations on the skull ofArchaeopteryx.Palaontol Z.88, 211–221 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mayr, G., De Pietri, V. L., Scofield, R. P. & Worthy, T. H. On the taxonomic composition and phylogenetic affinities of the recently proposed clade Vegaviidae Agnolín et al., 2017‒neornithine birds from the Upper Cretaceous of the Southern Hemisphere.Cretac. Res.86, 178–185 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Walsh, S. A., Milner, A. C. & Bourdon, E. A reappraisal ofCerebavis cenomanica (Aves, Ornithurae), from Melovatka, Russia.J. Anat.229, 215–227 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Alonso, P. D., Milner, A. C., Ketcham, R. A., Cookson, M. J. & Rowe, T. B. The avian nature of the brain and inner ear ofArchaeopteryx.Nature430, 666–669 (2004).

    Article ADS CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Balanoff, A. M., Bever, G. S., Rowe, T. B. & Norell, M. A. Evolutionary origins of the avian brain.Nature501, 93–96 (2013).

    Article ADS CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Elzanowski, A. & Galton, P. M. Braincase ofEnaliornis, an Early Cretaceous bird from England.J. Vertebr. Paleontol.11, 90–107 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Elzanowski, A. & Mayr, G. Multiple origins of secondary temporal fenestrae and orbitozygomatic junctions in birds.J. Zoolog. Syst. Evol. Res.https://doi.org/10.1111/jzs.12196 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Müller, H. J. Die morphologie und entwicklung des craniums vonRhea americana Linné. II. Viszeralskelett, mittelohr und osteocranium.Z. Wiss. Zool.168, 35–118 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Cracraft, J. The origin and early diversification of birds.Paleobiology12, 383–399 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Holliday, C. M. & Witmer, L. M. Archosaur adductor chamber evolution: integration of musculoskeletal and topological criteria in jaw muscle homology.J. Morphol.268, 457–484 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Bhullar, B. A. S. et al. A molecular mechanism for the origin of a key evolutionary innovation, the bird beak and palate, revealed by an integrative approach to major transitions in vertebrate history.Evolution69, 1665–1677 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Colbert, J. Maisano and the staff of the UTCT facility at The University of Texas at Austin, as well as G. Lin at the Harvard Center for Nanoscale Systems and A. Pritchard at Yale for CT scanning assistance. K. Zyskowski and G. Watkins-Colwell in the Division of Vertebrate Zoology at YPM assisted with extant comparative material. M. Fox, C. Norris and D. Brinkman facilitated the examination and scanning of YPM fossil material. This research was supported by Yale University, the Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History, the University of Bath, National Science Foundation Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant DEB 1500798, the Alexander Wetmore Memorial Research Award (American Ornithologists’ Union), a Yale Institute for Biospheric Studies Dissertation Improvement Grant, the Stephen J. Gould Award (Paleontological Society), an Evolving Earth Foundation Research Grant and a Frank M. Chapman Ornithological Research Grant (American Museum of Natural History).

Reviewer information

Nature thanks Z. Zhou and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Daniel J. Field, Michael Hanson.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geology & Geophysics and Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA

    Daniel J. Field, Michael Hanson & Bhart-Anjan S. Bhullar

  2. Biodiversity Institute and Natural History Museum, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA

    David Burnham & Kristopher Super

  3. Sternberg Museum of Natural History and Department of Geosciences, Fort Hays State University, Hays, KS, USA

    Laura E. Wilson

  4. Alabama Museum of Natural History, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA

    Dana Ehret

  5. McWane Science Center, Birmingham, AL, USA

    Jun A. Ebersole

  6. Department of Biology & Biochemistry, Milner Centre for Evolution, University of Bath, Bath, UK

    Daniel J. Field

Authors
  1. Daniel J. Field
  2. Michael Hanson
  3. David Burnham
  4. Laura E. Wilson
  5. Kristopher Super
  6. Dana Ehret
  7. Jun A. Ebersole
  8. Bhart-Anjan S. Bhullar

Contributions

D.J.F. and B.-A.S.B. conceived and directed the study and arranged logistics of specimen preparation and CT scanning. K.S. discovered the FHSM specimen and donated it to the museum. D.J.F., M.H. and B.-A.S.B. performed CT scans and processed CT data and M.H. assembled the skull reconstruction. M.H., D.J.F. and B.-A.S.B. scored characters and performed phylogenetic analyses. B.-A.S.B. and M.H. planned the main-text figures. M.H. and D.J.F. prepared the figures. D.J.F. wrote the supplementary anatomical descriptions and rendered the Supplementary Videos. D.B., L.E.W., K.S., D.E. and J.A.E. collected and prepared specimens for study, analysed morphology and edited the paper. B.-A.S.B., D.J.F. and M.H. wrote the paper. B.-A.S.B. and D.J.F. acquired funding.

Corresponding author

Correspondence toBhart-Anjan S. Bhullar.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Full 3D reconstruction of the skull ofI. dispar in high resolution.

This is the same reconstruction as shown in Fig. 1, reproduced at a higher resolution to show details.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Reconstruction of the skull ofI. dispar.

Material described in this paper is indicated in gold and previously described regions are indicated in grey. All elements are scaled to the size of the  FHSM VP-18702 specimen.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Reconstruction of the skull ofI. dispar indicating the material represented by every knownIchthyornis specimen.

All elements are scaled to the size of the FHSM VP-18702 specimen. Specimen numbers in bold are those used in the reconstruction. Numbers in italics indicate preservation of the same element in additional specimens.

Extended Data Fig. 4 High-resolution line drawing of the skull ofI. dispar.

This the same image as shown in Fig. 2, reproduced at a larger size to show details. All anatomical abbreviations are as indicated in Fig. 2. Solid lines indicate areas known from fossil specimens, and dashed lines indicate unknown areas reconstructed from other ornithuran birds.

Extended Data Fig. 5

Skull and jaw elements ofI. dispar specimen BHI 6421.

Extended Data Fig. 6

Skull and jaw elements ofI. dispar specimen FHSM VP-18702.

Extended Data Fig. 7

Skull and jaw elements ofI. dispar specimen KUVP 119673.

Extended Data Fig. 8

Skull and jaw elements ofI. dispar specimen ALMNH 3316.

Extended Data Fig. 9

Skull and jaw elements ofI. dispar holotype YPM 1450 showing the nasal and lacrimal elements that have not previously been reported.

Extended Data Fig. 10

Skull and jaw elements ofI. dispar specimens YPM 1728, YPM 1459, YPM 1775 and YPM 1749.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains supplementary text 1-9; which contains supplementary tree legends for 1-17, supplementary video legends 1-7, supplementary table 1 and supplementary figure 1

Supplementary Data

This file contains Supplementary Trees 1-17. (Tree legends can be found in the Supplementary Information)

41586_2018_53_MOESM7_ESM.mov

Video 4: YPM 1450, nasal and lacrimal. Partial nasal and lacrimal are attached as they were discovered in the reanalysis of YPM 1450

Rights and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Field, D.J., Hanson, M., Burnham, D.et al. CompleteIchthyornis skull illuminates mosaic assembly of the avian head.Nature557, 96–100 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0053-y

Download citation

This article is cited by

Comments

Commenting on this article is now closed.

  1. anon

    Where were the new specimens found?

Access through your institution
Buy or subscribe

Advertisement

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for theNature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox.Sign up for Nature Briefing
[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2025 Movatter.jp