Validating the potential of multi-frequency synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data for multi-layer and profile soil moisture (SM) estimation modeling, we conducted an airborne multi-frequency SAR joint observation experiment (AMFSEX) over the Liao River Basin in China. The experiment simultaneously acquired airborne high spatial
[...] Read more. Validating the potential of multi-frequency synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data for multi-layer and profile soil moisture (SM) estimation modeling, we conducted an airborne multi-frequency SAR joint observation experiment (AMFSEX) over the Liao River Basin in China. The experiment simultaneously acquired airborne high spatial resolution quad-polarization (quad-pol) SAR data at five frequencies, including the Ka-, X-, C-, S-, and L-band. A preliminary “vegetation–soil” parameter estimation model based on the multi-frequency SAR data was established. Theoretical penetration depths of the multi-frequency SAR data were analyzed using the Dobson empirical model and the Hallikainen modified model. On this basis, a water cloud model (WCM) constrained by multi-polarization weighted and penetration depth weighted parameters was used to analyze the estimation accuracy of the multi-layer and profile SM (0–50 cm depth) under different vegetation types (grassland, farmland, and woodland). Overall, the estimation error (root mean square error, RMSE) of the surface SM (0–5 cm depth) ranged from 0.058 cm
3/cm
3to 0.079 cm
3/cm
3, and increased with radar frequency. For multi-layer and profile SM (3 cm, 5 cm, 10 cm, 20 cm, 30 cm, 40 cm, 50 cm depth), the RMSE ranged from 0.040 cm
3/cm
3 to 0.069 cm
3/cm
3. Finally, a multi-input multi-output regression model (Gaussian process regression) was used to simultaneously estimate the multi-layer and profile SM. For surface SM, the overall RMSE was approximately 0.040 cm
3/cm
3. For multi-layer and profile SM, the overall RMSE ranged from 0.031 cm
3/cm
3to 0.064 cm
3/cm
3. The estimation accuracy achieved by coupling the multi-source data (multi-frequency SAR data, multispectral data, and soil parameters) was superior to that obtained using the SAR data alone. The optimal SM penetration depth varied across different vegetation cover types, generally falling within the range of 10–30 cm, which holds true for both the scattering model and the regression model. This study provides methodological guidance for the development of multi-layer and profile SM estimation models based on the multi-frequency SAR data.
Full article