2023 Hyundai Sonata
midsize car / 4-door sedan
Award applies only to vehicles built after December 2022
Crashworthiness
Crash avoidance & mitigation
| Evaluation criteria | Rating |
|---|---|
| Headlights (varies by trim/option) | |
| Front crash prevention: vehicle-to-vehicle | |
| Standard system | Superior |
| Front crash prevention: pedestrian (day) | |
| Standard system | Superior |
| Front crash prevention: pedestrian (night) | |
| Standard system | Advanced |
Seat belts & child restraints
| Evaluation criteria | Rating |
|---|---|
| Seat belt reminders | |
| LATCH ease of use |
Other available safety features
- Standard blind spot detection
- Standard lane departure warning & prevention
- Optional rear automatic braking
Key
- GGood
- AAcceptable
- MMarginal
- PPoor
- Superior
- Advanced
- Basic
Some ratings use a scale of Poor to Good. Others range from Basic to Superior.
Small overlap front: driver-side
Tested vehicle:2020 Hyundai Sonata SE 4-door
Rating applies to 2020-25 models
The Hyundai Sonata was redesigned for the 2020 model year. Driver-side small overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Hyundai.
| Evaluation criteria | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall evaluation | |
| Structure and safety cage | |
| Driver injury measures | |
| Head/neck | |
| Chest | |
| Hip/thigh | |
| Lower leg/foot | |
| Driver restraints and dummy kinematics | |
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement |
|---|---|
| Test ID | VTN1916 |
| Lower occupant compartment | |
| Lower hinge pillar max (cm) | 2 |
| Footrest (cm) | 4 |
| Left toepan (cm) | 3 |
| Brake pedal (cm) | 4 |
| Parking brake (cm) | |
| Rocker panel lateral average (cm) | 0 |
| Upper occupant compartment | |
| Steering column | 0 |
| Upper hinge pillar max (cm) | 2 |
| Upper dash (cm) | 2 |
| Lower instrument panel (cm) | 2 |
Driver injury measures
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement |
|---|---|
| Test ID | VTN1916 |
| Head | |
| HIC-15 | 96 |
| Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
| Neck | |
| Tension (kN) | 0.8 |
| Extension bending moment (Nm) | 15 |
| Maximum Nij | 0.16 |
| Chest maximum compression (mm) | 26 |
| Femur (kN) | |
| Left | 0.7 |
| Right | 0.1 |
| Knee displacement (mm) | |
| Left | 0 |
| Right | 1 |
| Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%) | |
| Left | 0 |
| Right | 0 |
| Maximum tibia index | |
| Left | 0.61 |
| Right | 0.45 |
| Tibia axial force (kN) | |
| Left | 2.6 |
| Right | 0.5 |
| Foot acceleration (g) | |
| Left | 50 |
| Right | 43 |
Small overlap front: passenger-side
Tested vehicle:2020 Hyundai Sonata SE 4-door
Rating applies to 2020-25 models
The Hyundai Sonata was redesigned for the 2020 model year. Passenger-side small overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Hyundai.
| Evaluation criteria | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall evaluation | |
| Structure and safety cage | |
| Passenger injury measures | |
| Head/neck | |
| Chest | |
| Hip/thigh | |
| Lower leg/foot | |
| Passenger restraints and dummy kinematics | |
| Driver injury measures | |
| Head/neck | |
| Chest | |
| Hip/thigh | |
| Lower leg/foot | |
| Driver restraints and dummy kinematics | |
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on passenger side
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement |
|---|---|
| Test ID | VTP1934 |
| Lower occupant compartment | |
| Lower hinge pillar max (cm) | 3 |
| Footrest (cm) | 4 |
| Right toepan (cm) | 3 |
| Center toepan (cm) | 1 |
| Rocker panel lateral average (cm) | 0 |
| Upper occupant compartment | |
| Center dash (cm) | 2 |
| Upper hinge pillar max (cm) | 2 |
| Upper dash (cm) | 2 |
| Right lower dash (cm) | 3 |
Passenger injury measures
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement |
|---|---|
| Test ID | VTP1934 |
| Head | |
| HIC-15 | 78 |
| Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
| Neck | |
| Tension (kN) | 0.7 |
| Extension bending moment (Nm) | 14 |
| Maximum Nij | 0.17 |
| Chest maximum compression (mm) | 25 |
| Femur (kN) | |
| Left | 0.1 |
| Right | 0.7 |
| Knee displacement (mm) | |
| Left | 0 |
| Right | 1 |
| Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%) | |
| Left | 0 |
| Right | 0 |
| Maximum tibia index | |
| Left | 0.34 |
| Right | 0.58 |
| Tibia axial force (kN) | |
| Left | 0.5 |
| Right | 3.4 |
| Foot acceleration (g) | |
| Left | 47 |
| Right | 66 |
Driver injury measures
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement |
|---|---|
| Test ID | VTP1934 |
| Head | |
| HIC-15 | 57 |
| Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
| Neck | |
| Tension (kN) | 0.7 |
| Extension bending moment (Nm) | 8 |
| Maximum Nij | 0.16 |
| Chest maximum compression (mm) | 21 |
| Femur (kN) | |
| Left | 0.2 |
| Right | 0.6 |
| Knee displacement (mm) | |
| Left | 1 |
| Right | 2 |
| Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%) | |
| Left | 0 |
| Right | 0 |
| Maximum tibia index | |
| Left | 0.23 |
| Right | 0.41 |
| Tibia axial force (kN) | |
| Left | 0.4 |
| Right | 1.5 |
| Foot acceleration (g) | |
| Left | 18 |
| Right | 32 |
Moderate overlap front: original test
Tested vehicle:2020 Hyundai Sonata SEL 4-door
Rating applies to 2020-25 models
The Hyundai Sonata was redesigned for the 2020 model year. Moderate overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Hyundai.
| Evaluation criteria | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall evaluation | |
| Structure and safety cage | |
| Driver injury measures | |
| Head/neck | |
| Chest | |
| Leg/foot, left | |
| Leg/foot, right | |
| Driver restraints and dummy kinematics | |
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement |
|---|---|
| Test ID | VTF1926 |
| Footwell intrusion | |
| Footrest (cm) | 3 |
| Left (cm) | 4 |
| Center (cm) | 5 |
| Right (cm) | 1 |
| Brake pedal (cm) | 5 |
| Instrument panel rearward movement | |
| Left (cm) | 0 |
| Right (cm) | -1 |
| Steering column movement | |
| Upward (cm) | -1 |
| Rearward (cm) | -4 |
| A-pillar rearward movement (cm) | 0 |
Driver injury measures
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement |
|---|---|
| Test ID | VTF1926 |
| Head | |
| HIC-15 | 213 |
| Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
| Neck | |
| Tension (kN) | 0.8 |
| Extension bending moment (Nm) | 9 |
| Maximum Nij | 0.19 |
| Chest maximum compression (mm) | 27 |
| Legs | |
| Femurforce - left(kN) | 0.4 |
| Femurforce - right(kN) | 1.0 |
| Kneedisplacement - left(mm) | 0 |
| Knee displacement - right (mm) | 2 |
| Maximumtibiaindex - left | 0.24 |
| Maximumtibiaindex - right | 0.43 |
| Tibia axialforce - left(kN) | 2.0 |
| Tibia axialforce - right(kN) | 2.2 |
| Foot acceleration (g) | |
| Left | 62 |
| Right | 44 |
Moderate overlap front: updated test
Tested vehicle:2023 Hyundai Sonata SE 4-door
Rating applies to 2023-24 models
The Hyundai Sonata was redesigned for the 2020 model year.
| Evaluation criteria | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall evaluation | |
| Structure and safety cage | |
| Driver injury measures | |
| Head/neck | |
| Chest | |
| Thigh/hip | |
| Leg/foot | |
| Driver restraints and dummy kinematics | |
| Rear passenger injury measures | |
| Head/neck | |
| Chest | |
| Thigh | |
| Rear passenger restraints and dummy kinematics | |
View of the vehicle after the crash showing the airbags and damage to the occupant compartment.
The rear passenger dummy's head remained a safe distance from the front seatback.
Rear passenger dummy injury values indicate a likelihood of injury to the head or neck and chest. During the crash, the shoulder belt remained in an ideal position on the dummy’s chest.
The rear passenger dummy's lap belt moved from the ideal position on the pelvis onto the abdomen, increasing the risk of abdominal injuries.
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement |
|---|---|
| Test ID | CEF2311 |
| Footwell intrusion | |
| Footrest (cm) | 3 |
| Left (cm) | 5 |
| Center (cm) | 7 |
| Right (cm) | 2 |
| Brake pedal (cm) | 6 |
| Instrument panel rearward movement | |
| Left (cm) | -1 |
| Right (cm) | -1 |
| Steering column movement | |
| Upward (cm) | 0 |
| Rearward (cm) | -4 |
| A-pillar rearward movement (cm) | 0 |
Driver injury measures
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement |
|---|---|
| Test ID | CEF2311 |
| Head | |
| HIC-15 | 254 |
| Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
| Neck | |
| Tension (kN) | 0.7 |
| Extension bending moment (Nm) | 7 |
| Maximum Nij | 0.18 |
| Chest maximum compression (mm) | 26 |
| Femur (kN) | |
| Left | 0.5 |
| Right | 1.2 |
| Knee displacement (mm) | |
| Left | 1 |
| Right | 2 |
| Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%) | |
| Left | 0 |
| Right | 0 |
| Maximum tibia index | |
| Left | 0.27 |
| Right | 0.43 |
| Tibia axial force (kN) | |
| Left | 2.9 |
| Right | 3.0 |
| Foot acceleration (g) | |
| Left | 58 |
| Right | 45 |
Rear passenger injury measures
| Test ID | CEF2311 |
|---|---|
| Head | |
| HIC-15 for head contact during forward excursion | no contact |
| Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
| Neck | |
| Tension (kN) | 3.8 |
| Compression (kN) | 0.2 |
| Maximum Nij for head contact during forward excursion | no contact |
| Chest | |
| Chest index | 33 |
| Shoulder belt tension (kN) | 7.1 |
| Thigh (kN) | |
| Left femur compression | 1.4 |
| Right femur compression | 0.3 |
Side: updated test
Tested vehicle: 2022 Hyundai Sonata SEL 4-door
Rating applies to 2020-23 models
The Hyundai Sonata was redesigned for the 2020 model year.
| Evaluation criteria | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall evaluation | |
| Structure and safety cage | |
| Driver injury measures | |
| Head/neck | |
| Torso | |
| Pelvis | |
| Driver head protection | |
| Rear passenger injury measures | |
| Head/neck | |
| Torso | |
| Pelvis | |
| Rear passenger head protection | |
View of the vehicle just after the crash test.
View of the vehicle after the crash with doors removed, showing the side airbags and damage to the occupant compartment.
Smeared greasepaint shows where the driver dummy's head was protected from being hit by hard structures by the side airbags.
Smeared greasepaint shows where the rear passenger dummy’s head was protected by the side airbags.
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement |
|---|---|
| Test ID | CES2222 |
| B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm) | -14.5 |
| Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline. | |
Driver injury measures
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement |
|---|---|
| Test ID | CES2222 |
| Head | |
| HIC-15 | 195 |
| Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
| Neck | |
| Tension (kN) | 1.7 |
| Compression (kN) | 0.1 |
| Shoulder | |
| Lateral deflection (mm) | 39 |
| Lateral force (kN) | 1.6 |
| Torso | |
| Maximum deflection (mm) | 38 |
| Average deflection (mm) | 37 |
| Maximum deflection rate (m/s) | 5.84 |
| Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) | 0.96 |
| Pelvis | |
| Combined force (kN) | 4.4 |
Passenger injury measures
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement |
|---|---|
| Test ID | CES2222 |
| Head | |
| HIC-15 | 111 |
| Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
| Neck | |
| Tension (kN) | 1.3 |
| Compression (kN) | 0.4 |
| Shoulder | |
| Lateral deflection (mm) | 19 |
| Lateral force (kN) | 0.9 |
| Torso | |
| Maximum deflection (mm) | 18 |
| Average deflection (mm) | 13 |
| Maximum deflection rate (m/s) | 2.17 |
| Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) | 0.13 |
| Pelvis | |
| Combined force (kN) | 6.0 |
Roof strength
Tested vehicle:2020 Hyundai Sonata SE 4-door
Rating applies to 2020-23 models
| Overall evaluation | |
|---|---|
| Curb weight | 3,125 lbs |
| Peak force | 16,761 lbs |
| Strength-to-weight ratio | 5.36 |
Head restraints & seats
Seat type:Manual cloth seat
| Seat type | Manual cloth seat |
|---|---|
| Geometry | |
| Backset (mm) | 35 |
| Distance below top of head (mm) | 14 |
| Seat design parameters | |
| Pass/fail | Pass |
| Max T1 acceleration (g) | 10.3 |
| Head contact time (ms) | 65 |
| Force rating | 1 |
| Neck forces | |
| Max neck shear force (N) | 33 |
| Max neck tension (N) | 428 |
About the head restraint & seat test
Currently, IIHS tests apply only to front seats.
Headlights
Ratings are given for3 different headlight variations available on this vehicle.
(1)Trim level(s):Limited trim; built before January 2023, Hybrid Limited trim; built before January 2023
| Evaluation criteria | Rating |
|---|---|
| Low-beam headlight type | LED projector |
| High-beam headlight type | LED projector |
| Curve-adaptive? | No |
| High-beam assist? | Yes |
| Overall rating | |
| Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination: | |
Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good in all 4 tests.
The low beams created some glare.
High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good on the gradual right and gradual left curves and fair on the sharp right and sharp left curves.
High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the sharp left curve and on the sharp right curve.
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement |
|---|---|
| Trim level(s) |
|
| Low-beam headlight type | LED projector |
| High-beam headlight type | LED projector |
| Curve-adaptive? | No |
| High-beam assist? | Yes |
| Overall rating Applies to 2020-23 models built before January 2023 |
| LOW BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) | Amount glare exceeded threshold |
|---|---|---|
| Straightaway right edge | 118.0 m | 14.8% |
| Straightaway left edge | 71.9 m | 14.8% |
| 250m radius right curve, right edge | 75.2 m | 9.7% |
| 250m radius left curve, left edge | 71.6 m | None |
| 150m radius right curve, right edge | 59.6 m | None |
| 150m radius left curve, left edge | 55.2 m | None |
| HIGH BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) |
|---|---|
| Straightaway right edge | 191.2 m |
| Straightaway left edge | 160.1 m |
| 250m radius right curve, right edge | 80.6 m |
| 250m radius left curve, left edge | 76.3 m |
| 150m radius right curve, right edge | 60.7 m |
| 150m radius left curve, left edge | 57.5 m |
(2)Trim level(s):All trims; built after December 2022
| Evaluation criteria | Rating |
|---|---|
| Low-beam headlight type | LED projector |
| High-beam headlight type | LED projector |
| Curve-adaptive? | No |
| High-beam assist? | Yes |
| Overall rating | |
| Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination: | |
Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good in all 4 tests.
The low beams created some glare.
High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good on the gradual right and gradual left curves and fair on the sharp right and sharp left curves.
High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the sharp left curve and on the sharp right curve.
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement |
|---|---|
| Trim level(s) |
|
| Low-beam headlight type | LED projector |
| High-beam headlight type | LED projector |
| Curve-adaptive? | No |
| High-beam assist? | Yes |
| Overall rating Applies to 2020-23 models built after December 2022 |
| LOW BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) | Amount glare exceeded threshold |
|---|---|---|
| Straightaway right edge | 118.0 m | 14.8% |
| Straightaway left edge | 71.9 m | 14.8% |
| 250m radius right curve, right edge | 75.2 m | 9.7% |
| 250m radius left curve, left edge | 71.6 m | None |
| 150m radius right curve, right edge | 59.6 m | None |
| 150m radius left curve, left edge | 55.2 m | None |
| HIGH BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) |
|---|---|
| Straightaway right edge | 191.2 m |
| Straightaway left edge | 160.1 m |
| 250m radius right curve, right edge | 80.6 m |
| 250m radius left curve, left edge | 76.3 m |
| 150m radius right curve, right edge | 60.7 m |
| 150m radius left curve, left edge | 57.5 m |
(3)Trim level(s):SE trim; built before January 2023, SEL trim; built before January 2023, SEL Plus trim; built before January 2023, Hybrid Blue trim; built before January 2023, Hybrid SEL trim; built before January 2023
| Evaluation criteria | Rating |
|---|---|
| Low-beam headlight type | LED reflector |
| High-beam headlight type | LED reflector |
| Curve-adaptive? | No |
| High-beam assist? | Yes |
| Overall rating | |
| Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination: | |
Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was fair in all 4 tests.
The low beams created some glare.
High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good on the gradual left curve, fair on the gradual right and sharp left curves, and inadequate on the sharp right curve.
High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the straightaway, on both left curves and on both right curves.
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement |
|---|---|
| Trim level(s) |
|
| Low-beam headlight type | LED reflector |
| High-beam headlight type | LED reflector |
| Curve-adaptive? | No |
| High-beam assist? | Yes |
| Overall rating Applies to 2020-23 models built before January 2023 |
| LOW BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) | Amount glare exceeded threshold |
|---|---|---|
| Straightaway right edge | 93.2 m | 52.5% |
| Straightaway left edge | 68.4 m | 52.5% |
| 250m radius right curve, right edge | 60.8 m | None |
| 250m radius left curve, left edge | 63.0 m | None |
| 150m radius right curve, right edge | 48.9 m | None |
| 150m radius left curve, left edge | 50.5 m | None |
| HIGH BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) |
|---|---|
| Straightaway right edge | 171.5 m |
| Straightaway left edge | 167.8 m |
| 250m radius right curve, right edge | 73.1 m |
| 250m radius left curve, left edge | 76.9 m |
| 150m radius right curve, right edge | 51.2 m |
| 150m radius left curve, left edge | 55.1 m |
Front crash prevention: vehicle-to-vehicle
System details
- standard Forward Collision-Avoidance Assist w/ Pedestrain Detection
| Evaluation criteria | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall evaluation | Superior Superior |
| Applies to 2020-23 models |
- This system meets the requirements for forward collision warning.
- In the 12 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.
- In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.
Front crash prevention: pedestrian (day)
System details
- standard Forward Collision-Avoidance Assist with Pedestrian Detection
| Overall evaluation | Superior Superior |
| This rating applies to all 2020-23 models | |
Crossing child
- In the 12 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.
- In the 25 mph test, impact speed was reduced by 24 mph.
Crossing adult
- In the 12 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.
- In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.
Parallel adult
- In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.
- In the 37 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision. A warning was issued 1.9 seconds before impact.
Front crash prevention: pedestrian (night)
System details
- standard Forward Collision-Avoidance Assist with Pedestrian Detection
| Overall evaluation | Advanced Advanced |
| Includes high-beam assist credit | |
| Applies to all 2022-23 models | |
Crossing adult
- In the 12 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision when using its high beams. When using its low beams, this vehicle avoided a collision.
- In the 25 mph test, impact speed was reduced by 21 mph when using its high beams. When using its low beams, impact speed was reduced by 22 mph.
Parallel adult
- In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision when using its high beams. When using its low beams, this vehicle avoided a collision.
- In the 37 mph test, impact speed was reduced by 28 mph when using its high beams and a warning was issued 1.6 seconds before impact. When using its low beams, impact speed was reduced by 28 mph and a warning was issued 1.4 seconds before impact.
Seat belt reminders
Rating applies to 2022-23 models
| Evaluation criteria | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall evaluation | |
| Front row | |
| Unbelted occupant alert (audible & visual) | |
| Initiation time | |
| Duration | Long enough (90+ seconds) |
| Volume | |
| Audio frequency | |
| Second row | |
| Startup status alert (visual) | None |
| Background cabin sound pressure level at 24 km/h | 51 dB |
| Audible signal sound pressure level at 24 km/h | 61 dB |
| Difference between background and signal | 10.8 dB |
| Background cabin sound pressure level at 40 km/h | 54 dB |
| Audible signal sound pressure level at 40 km/h | 62 dB |
| Difference between background and signal | 7.7 dB |
| Dominant audio frequency | 800 Hz |
Child seat anchors
Rating applies to 2020-25 models
| Evaluation criteria | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall evaluation | |
| Vehicle trim | SE |
| Seat type | cloth |
This vehicle has 2 rear seating positions with complete child seat attachment (LATCH) hardware. It has 1 additional seating position with a tether anchor only.
| Rating icon | Rating |
|---|---|
| G | Good |
| A | Acceptable |
| M | Marginal |
| P | Poor |
| Seating positions that rely on borrowed lower anchors or have only a tether anchor available are not rated. | |
thether anchor symbol | Tether anchor |
lower anchor symbol | Lower anchors |
shared lower achors symbol | Lower anchor(s) can be borrowed from adjacent positions(s) |
| No hardware available |
Details by seating position
| Position | Rating |
|---|---|
| 1 | |
| Tether anchor | |
| easy-to-find location | |
| no other hardware could be confused for anchor | |
| Lower anchors | |
| too deep in seat | |
| not too much force needed to attach | |
| easy to maneuver around anchors | |
| 2 | |
| Tether anchor | |
| easy-to-find location | |
| no other hardware could be confused for anchor | |
| Lower anchors | |
| none available | |
| 3 | |
| Tether anchor | |
| easy-to-find location | |
| no other hardware could be confused for anchor | |
| Lower anchors | |
| too deep in seat | |
| not too much force needed to attach | |
| easy to maneuver around anchors |
Seat position 21
| Lower anchor A | |
|---|---|
| Open access rated | No |
| Depth(cm) | 2-4 |
| Force (lbs) | 22 |
| Clearance angle (degrees) | 73 |
| Lower anchor B | |
| Open access rated | No |
| Depth(cm) | 2-4 |
| Force (lbs) | 14 |
| Clearance angle (degrees) | 75 |
| Tether anchor | |
| Location | Rear deck |
| Confusing hardware present | No |
| Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor | No |
| Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH | Not measured |
Seat position 22
| Lower anchor A | |
|---|---|
| No lower latch for this seat position | |
| Lower anchor B | |
| No lower latch for this seat position | |
| Tether anchor | |
| Location | Rear deck |
| Confusing hardware present | No |
| Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor | No |
| Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH | Not measured |
Seat position 23
| Lower anchor A | |
|---|---|
| Open access rated | No |
| Depth(cm) | 2-4 |
| Force (lbs) | 28 |
| Clearance angle (degrees) | 63 |
| Lower anchor B | |
| Open access rated | No |
| Depth(cm) | 2-4 |
| Force (lbs) | 21 |
| Clearance angle (degrees) | 63 |
| Tether anchor | |
| Location | Rear deck |
| Confusing hardware present | No |
| Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor | No |
| Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH | Not measured |