Gawker to Quentin Tarantino: We’re Safely Based in the Cayman Islands
Nick Denton's company throws up a jurisdictional challenge to the lawsuit over the "Hateful Eight" leak.
Nick Denton Headshot - P 2013
APGawker has a tropical reason why a judge should dismissQuentin Tarantino‘s lawsuit over a leak of hisHateful Eight script.
According to a motion filed Wednesday, “This Court lacks personal jurisdiction over [Gawker Media Group, Inc.], a Cayman Islands corporation which is not subject to general jurisdiction because it does not have any continuous and systematic contacts with California and is not subject to specific jurisdiction because it does not publish the website at issue in plaintiff’s Complaint and was not involved in any way with the researching, writing, editing, or publishing of the article that is the subject of plaintiff’s Complaint.”
AsThe Hollywood Reporter first reported, Tarantinois suing Gawker for contributory copyright infringement in connection with Gawker’s Defamer blog linking to the 146-page script undera post titled, “?Here Is the Leaked Quentin Tarantino Hateful Eight Script.”
The lawsuit says that Gawker “crossed the journalistic line by promoting itself to the public as the first source to read the entire Screenplay illegally.”
STORY: Does Quentin Tarantino Have a Case Against Gawker?
The disputecould open up a judicial discussion of secondary liability and news reporting privileges, but first Tarantino must deal with the nuances of jurisdiction. The director, who is known for having international cinema tastes, now has to focus on the Cayman Islands.
“GMGI has no operations or employees in California or elsewhere,” says amotion to dismiss. “Rather, it is a Cayman Islands holding company. Its sole assets are equity securities in its subsidiaries, one of which is defendant Gawker Media, LLC. In short, GMGI does not publish anything, including without limitation the website found at www.gawker.com.”
So the lawsuit is taking a little bit of an unexpected detour in howNick Denton has set up his publishing company.
Even if the judge grants the motion, it probably won’t end the dispute. A footnote in the legal brief states that Gawker Media is not contesting personal jurisdiction nor Gawker Entertainment. “However, Gawker Entertainment, LLC was dissolved as a corporation in 2013, and counsel for the parties have reached an agreement that Gawker Entertainment, LLC is not a proper party to this action,” says the footnote.
As to the merits of the contributory copyright infringement claim, there isn’t any discussion of that just yet. The closest that the motion comes is by talking about the “public dissemination” ofHateful Eight on January 21. “On this date, plaintiff gave an interview, which was widely reported in the media, to the effect that he had given copies of the script to certain individuals and that the script was now circulating publicly,” says the brief.
In a Jan. 30 post, Gawker editorJohn Cook blamed Tarantino for “deliberately” turning the leak into news by revealing it to the media.
Gawker Media Group is being represented by attorneys at Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz.
E-mail: Eriq.Gardner@THR.com
Twitter: @eriqgardner
Related Stories
THR Newsletters
Sign up for THR news straight to your inbox every day
More from The Hollywood Reporter
Essential Reads
THR Newsletters
Sign up for THR news straight to your inbox every day
The Definitive Voice of Entertainment News
Subscribe for full access to The Hollywood Reporter