Here's another look at the Galaxy Buds4 and Buds4 Pro ahead of launch next weekComments

Post your comment

Pages:12 »

User935
gEb
1 hour ago

Anonymous, 3 hours agoYou can have both. In ear monitors are better at home. But true wireless earbuds are better wh...moreNice over-ears are even better at home, IMO.

But I don't really understand what's supposed to be more convenient about regular "true wireless" earphones than the Shures I mentioned (or any other Shures paired with their TW adapters)? The charging case is a bit larger than most, I guess, but other than that 🤷‍♂️

They're just as much "true wireless" as anything else. And sound better, are far more flexible, you can just come home and plug cables in while you charge them or if you want lossless or completely latency free sound, you can get the (IMO amazing) Comply Professional tips for them (come included with pricier models like my wife's AONIC 5)... In my view, a whole world of things you can't do with "regular" TW earphones.

Yes, you also get it with separate IEMs and TW, but why when these are both and you've only got so many years of good hearing in your life; why waste both money and your good hearing years on mediocre sound? 👂

DFranch
xwW
2 hours ago

They need to have Multipoint connection so I can connect to my computer and phone at the same time. No idea why Samsung refuses to add this very common feature.

Anonymous
099
3 hours ago

FatalXE, 15 hours agoJust bought Buds pro 3, instant regret. Cheap copy of Apple, controls are horrible, earphones ...moreThat's why I bought 2 pro instead. No regret. Works great and sounds great.

Anonymous
099
3 hours ago

User935, 12 hours agoI'll never understand why anyone buys this e-waste when the same money can get proper IEM...moreYou can have both. In ear monitors are better at home. But true wireless earbuds are better when you walk outside. Sound quality may be inferior but convenience is better.

Anonymous
099
3 hours ago

Anonymous, 12 hours agoSo, they're not allowed to use what they own? This is literally the reason they bought Ha...moreI mean they can do whatever they want but why not make a different design?

AnonD-1043101
txG
6 hours ago

anthonyp6690, 23 hours agoHow good is it gonna be then?it's as good as $5 gas station TWS

AnonD-1043101
txG
6 hours ago

Anonymous, 12 hours agoSo, they're not allowed to use what they own? This is literally the reason they bought Ha...morehow is this innovation when they copy cheap earbuds 😂😂😂🤣 also, 24 bit over Bluetooth is not possible with current technology. it can be done via DAC and Amp but that requires USB-C.

i doubt this earbud only supports SBC or calls only at all on other phones lmao

User935
gEb
6 hours ago

Anonymous, 7 hours agoThere is called Dac or AmpHm, perhaps you misunderstood me, I was only talking about Bluetooth here... Any Bluetooth DAC/amp will have the same limitations, i.e. no lossless; or, with aptX Lossless, only in perfect conditions. And only 16 bit/44,1 kHz.

A wired DAC/amp can, of course, just like a built-in one on phones with a 3,5 mm jack, use any lossless signal.

Anonymous
gW{
7 hours ago

no Bluetooth codec supports true 32-bit or 36-bit lossless transmission. LDAC can support up to 32-bit, but at a lossy compression rate.

Anonymous
gW{
7 hours ago

User935, 12 hours agoWho told you that lie? There's no such thing as 24 bit lossless BT audio anywhere in sigh...moreThere is called Dac or Amp

User935
gEb
12 hours ago

Anonymous, 12 hours agoSo, they're not allowed to use what they own? This is literally the reason they bought Ha...moreWho told you that lie? There's no such thing as 24 bit lossless BT audio anywhere in sight, not from Samsung or anyone else. Even 16 bit lossless is much more theoretical than a reality.

User935
gEb
12 hours ago

FatalXE, 15 hours agoJust bought Buds pro 3, instant regret. Cheap copy of Apple, controls are horrible, earphones ...moreI'll never understand why anyone buys this e-waste when the same money can get proper IEMs in wireless; e.g. Shure AONIC 215.

But to each their own. 🤷‍♂️

Anonymous
B0g
12 hours ago

Anonymous, 12 hours agoYeah I know that. But this looks nothing but a useless copy.So, they're not allowed to use what they own? This is literally the reason they bought Harman Kardon. To get access to the biggest knowledge pool in high end audio. That is also why Samsung is the only brand capable of delivering lossless 24-bit audio on bluetooth. And also the reason Samsung will be the first brand to abandon bluetooth for UWB. If you stop innovating, you end up like Sony or Nokia.

Anonymous
099
12 hours ago

9el, 15 hours agoSamsung owns JBL 😉Yeah I know that. But this looks nothing but a useless copy.

Anon Moose
Ss{
14 hours ago

Oh so now we're skimping on the little earpieces as well, huh? NEXT UP! Earbuds sold separately from the charging case!

9el
nDx
15 hours ago

Anonymous, 21 hours agoLooks similar to jbl live pro 2. The last unique samsung was buds pro 2.Samsung owns JBL 😉

FatalXE
A{t
15 hours ago

Just bought Buds pro 3, instant regret. Cheap copy of Apple, controls are horrible, earphones constanly fall out cause of proprietary locking mechanism, software issues where my music sudently starts playing from speaker phone, (never happened with previous 2 headphones)
typical Scamsung

Cake
fCK
18 hours ago

jiyen235, 21 hours agothey found a way to make it look even cheaper, at least the silver finish last time had SOME a...moreYes, Buds 2 Pro were peak

Anton the. Papi
Bi}
20 hours ago

To be honest, they seem cheap for now, we'll have to see the final result

jiyen235
XNA
21 hours ago

they found a way to make it look even cheaper, at least the silver finish last time had SOME aura, this is just sad. Looks like a 2 dollar chinese clone.