Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork4.1k
Make Play compatible with latest Scala#13020
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
base:main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
a3d8cf0
to51e41c2
Compare This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
423c0fb
to34fe59b
Compareajafri2001 commentedMay 10, 2025 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
@mkurz hi! I’m interested in working on these issues and would love to help make twirl templates more scala3 friendly. If you have any guidance or suggestions on how to get started, I’d really appreciate it! 🥰 regardingthis issue, my current thinking is to somehow check whether the definition site uses what would be the ideal way to approach this? (LSP support for play specific files like twirl and routes are a part of my summer project so I have vested interest in making the experience better 😅) |
All tests and scripted tests pass with 3.7.2-RC1 |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
This is not intended to be merged; however, we want Play to be compatible with newer Scala versions.
Implicit parameters should be provided with a using clause
warning since Scala 3.7 twirl#894Footnotes
https://www.scala-lang.org/news/next-scala-lts-jdk.html↩