- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork321
feat: add BIGNUMERIC support#527
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
All (the pull request submitter and all commit authors) CLAs are signed,but one or more commits were authored or co-authored by someone other than the pull request submitter. We need to confirm that all authors are ok with their commits being contributed to this project. Please have them confirm that by leaving a comment that contains only Note to project maintainer: There may be cases where the author cannot leave a comment, or the comment is not properly detected as consent. In those cases, you can manually confirm consent of the commit author(s), and set the ℹ️Googlers:Go here for more info. |
plamut commentedFeb 18, 2021
@HemangChothani If you see this, can you please confirm to the bot that you consent using your commits? (this PR builds on top of your work) Thanks! |
All (the pull request submitter and all commit authors) CLAs are signed,but one or more commits were authored or co-authored by someone other than the pull request submitter. We need to confirm that all authors are ok with their commits being contributed to this project. Please have them confirm that by leaving a comment that contains only Note to project maintainer: There may be cases where the author cannot leave a comment, or the comment is not properly detected as consent. In those cases, you can manually confirm consent of the commit author(s), and set the ℹ️Googlers:Go here for more info. |
plamut commentedFeb 18, 2021
Tests will have to be refactored to not assume |
tswast left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Looking good! One suggestion regarding the version comparison. We also will need someskipifs. Might be able to do those based on the pattern we have ingoogle-auth, with a private constant that indicates if the BIGNUMERIC feature is available.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
All (the pull request submitter and all commit authors) CLAs are signed,but one or more commits were authored or co-authored by someone other than the pull request submitter. We need to confirm that all authors are ok with their commits being contributed to this project. Please have them confirm that by leaving a comment that contains only Note to project maintainer: There may be cases where the author cannot leave a comment, or the comment is not properly detected as consent. In those cases, you can manually confirm consent of the commit author(s), and set the ℹ️Googlers:Go here for more info. |
tswast left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
One question, but otherwise looks good
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
plamut commentedFeb 23, 2021 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
@shollyman Can you please take a look at the CLA? The PR is a continuation of#447 which was opened by an existing maintainer, but I do see that the CLA check has failed there even though the PR was submitted before the before the new year. (to date the original author has not yet responded here) |
tswast commentedFeb 23, 2021
"CLAs are signed, but unable to verify author consent" Since these commits were pulled from#447, I'm going to call that author consent and mark the label as true. |
🤖 I have created a release \*beep\* \*boop\* ---## [2.10.0](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/compare/v2.9.0...v2.10.0) (2021-02-25)### Features* add BIGNUMERIC support ([#527](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/issues/527)) ([cc3394f](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/commit/cc3394f80934419eb00c2029bb81c92a696e7d88))### Bug Fixes* error using empty array of structs parameter ([#474](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/issues/474)) ([c1d15f4](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/commit/c1d15f4e5da4b7e10c00afffd59a5c7f3ded027a))* QueryJob.exception() *returns* the errors, not raises them ([#467](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/issues/467)) ([d763279](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/commit/d7632799769248b09a8558ba18f5025ebdd9675a))### Documentation* **bigquery:** Add alternative approach to setting credentials ([#517](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/issues/517)) ([60fbf28](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/commit/60fbf287b0d34d5db2e61cce7a5b42735ed43d0e))* explain retry behavior for DONE jobs ([#532](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/issues/532)) ([696c443](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/commit/696c443f0a6740be0767e12b706a7771bc1460c3))---This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
Closes#367.
This is a continuation of#447 that adds extra tests and a few final touches.
PR checklist: