I think the f/2.8 zoom suggestion is a good one. I don't think setting up scenes is what you want, but rather moving around looking for the most compelling perspective (which often means you are ... Tokina AT-X Pro 14-20mm f/2 Lighter and is excellent even wide open. I look at mine every day because they are on my three computer monitors running simultaneously on my desktop. I also have prints on the wall, and I make it a point to participate in sharing photos ... +1 OP just bought a DR-6 and got over $2500 worth of gear for free. The bottom one was something I have been displaying for years that I just grabbed to put up here, it isn't set up for 4K display, though I do have a 20x30 inch print of it on the wall in my bedroom. ... Without peeking at the EXIF data, please tell me what distinguishes these from one another in terms of the format used. Yes, you are quite right. I mixed up the actual shutter speed with the shutter speed/focal length formula. That is, if you are thinking that you can do a shutter speed that is 1x the focal length ... So true! I have a Tokina AT-X Pro 14-20mm f/2 lens for my D500, and it's stellar. I know a lot of people think 14mm on DX/APS-C or 21mm on FX/"Full Frame" isn't wide enough, but I spend more time ... I have one other thing to add to this. Whatever shutter speed is used on a larger format to avoid shake/vibration should be increased accordingly on a smaller format. That is, if in your example ... Thank you for taking the time with your thoughtful reply. I found it interesting and informative. Your situation does however appear to be case specific. Looking at Bill Claff's website from which ... Can you elaborate on this? Equivalence suggests that all things equal, there is no difference. Same DOF and same shutter speed will affect the exposure accordingly, so a larger format will have ... Yes, of course. It happens with larger formats too. I would start out testing the lenses you have, against each other, which is what I always do when I get a new lens. Learn about your lenses' ... A picture is worth a thousand words. My take is that there is more latitude with the D500 where a slight amount of blur will disappear whereas with the D300 the smallest details are more important. I suspect a bent aperture lever in the mount. The thing about software "intervention" is that more detail resolved means that the end result can have more detail and still be just as clean.
Activity older than 12 months is not displayed. | | Total messages | 100 | | Threads started | 2 | | Last post | 1 hour ago |
| Total comments | 0 | | Total likes | 0 |
| Photos uploaded | 50 | | Last upload | 2 days ago |
|
