Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


‘Siegel paid $0.9m by PPP govt’

PublishedJanuary 21, 2016

ISLAMABAD: The counsel for former military ruler retired General Pervez Musharraf informed an anti-terrorism court (ATC) on Wednesday that the PPP government had paid US lobbyist Mark Siegel $900,000 to project a ‘soft image of Pakistan’.

During Mr Seigel’s cross-examination – conducted via video link – in the Benazir Bhutto murder case, Barrister Farogh Nasim also pointed out that prior to the signing of the $900,000 contract, Mr Seigel had signed a contract to lobby for the international investigation of Benazir Bhutto’s murder as a pro bono case.

The counsel also contended that since Mr Siegel was a paid lobbyist, his testimony could not be treated as independent and impartial.


Counsel for Gen Pervez Musharraf informed an ATC during Mr Seigel’s cross-examination


Barrister Nasim also shared photocopies of the contract signed by Mr Siegel and asked him to verify it. However, the lobbyist refused to verify them, saying that they were copies and he could only verify the original documents. Barrister Nasim asserted that the documents are available on the website of the US Department of Justice and sought more time to submit the originals.

During his cross-examination, Mr Siegel claimed that he was a friend of the Bhutto family and lobbied for them. After 2008, he was engaged by the PPP government for the same purpose.

Mr Siegel had recorded an earlier statement before an ATC on Oct 1, where he had connected Gen Musharraf with Ms Bhutto’s murder on the basis that the former military ruler, despite imminent threats to her life, deliberately deprived Ms Bhutto of the security detail she deserved in her capacity as a former prime minister.

In his statement, the lobbyist claimed that the PPP sought permission from Gen Musharraf to bring foreign security personnel with Ms Bhutto and asked for vehicles with tinted glasses, but both requests were denied.

Mark Seigel’s statement was recorded in-camera at the commissioner’s office in Rawalpindi. In his deposition, he told the court he was Jewish and had sworn an oath on the Old Testament. He said he was a paid lobbyist for PPP and Asif Ali Zardari after 2008, and earlier between 1986 to 1988.

Published in Dawn, January 21st, 2016

Email


Malik Asad is an Islamabad-based reporter for Dawn with two decades of experience covering legal affairs, judicial developments, and the civil bureaucracy. He can be found on X at@asadrp.

Malik Asad

Read more

Comments (8) Closed
Azam A Siddiqui
Jan 21, 2016 10:34am
This case is subjudice
Recommend0
Ali Raza
Jan 21, 2016 11:16am
Did he inform the US government officials about the threat hurled by the Gen? Did he keep to himself?
Recommend0
ishrat salim
Jan 21, 2016 02:50pm
How can 1 expect a paid lobbyist to tell the truth ? especially being a lobbyist from 2008 to ?
Recommend0
pakiboy
Jan 21, 2016 03:05pm
Cmon do you really trust politicians.... especially Zardari.
Recommend0
Bin ya Min Khalid
Jan 21, 2016 04:02pm
of more than 60 witnesses examined so far not a single shred of evidence has been produced against Musharraf.How can a paid lobbyist influence the case?
Recommend0
analyses
Jan 21, 2016 04:06pm
Mr Siegel has helped both Benazir Bhutto and Asif Ali Zardari for more than a decade. Anyone can easily judge the character of a person who is friends with, and supports Asif Zardari's (and BB's) cause. Btw has anyone noticed why we have this inferiority complex that if an American person is telling something, it has to be the truth? Not all people there are honest too. Some people in West are also as hungry for money as we have here.
Recommend0
Solomon2
Jan 21, 2016 10:06pm
Siegel was asked to verify a public document the barrister says was downloaded from the internet. That's neither a certified copy nor a notarized one. Refusing to verify such a copy was entirely proper. If Siegel had verified it the decision of the court could have been not honored or overturned on appeal on this point alone.While I'm no fan of the PPP I don't think Siegel deserves vilification here for doing his paid job of serving Pakistanis, nor do I think he did the Court a disservice - otherwise, he would have been held in contempt, rather than the barrister tasked to do his homework properly.
Recommend0
naji
Jan 22, 2016 01:11am
This is not a new breaking news. Everyone in US and Europe who has little interest knows that PPP Benazir and Zardari are regular member of Lobbying company since 1988. All games were played by these Lobbying companies and PPP leaders in Pakistan.
Recommend0
HELLO CHERY TIGGO 9: Pakistan’s first luxury E-SUV price announced

HELLO CHERY TIGGO 9: Pakistan’s first luxury E-SUV price announced

Some arrivals disrupt expectations, others redefine what follows.
MoltyHome: An integrated, manufacturing-backed furniture business positioned for scalable growth in Pakistan

MoltyHome: An integrated, manufacturing-backed furniture business positioned for scalable growth in Pakistan

Rising urbanisation, increased housing development and evolving consumer preferences are accelerating demand for reliable, well-designed, locally manufactured furniture.
Master MoltyFoam sets a new benchmark with Pakistan’s most advanced AI Sleep Assistant

Master MoltyFoam sets a new benchmark with Pakistan’s most advanced AI Sleep Assistant

Master MoltyFoam’s recent launch of an AI-powered assistant reflects this shift, focusing on simplifying mattress buying through structured, accessible support.

Most Popular

Latest Stories

Man arrested for attacking Engineer Muhammad Ali Mirza in Jhelum: police

We should have just stuck to the boycott, say fans after humiliating Pakistan vs India T20

Former US president Obama says ‘aliens are real’: report

Board of Peace members have committed ‘thousands of personnel’ to Gaza force: Trump

Punjab CM vows ‘strict and indiscriminate action’ against price hikes, hoarding during Ramazan

Pakistan Mother Languages Festival highlights link between climate change and cultural identity

Opinion

Frozen relationship

Frozen relationship

By closing the border and halting trade, Islamabad is raising the costs for Kabul’s inaction on TTP.

Editorial

Heavy cost of SOEs
16 Feb, 2026

Heavy cost of SOEs

BURDENED by chronic losses and rising debt, Pakistan’s SOEs have for years drained public funds that could have...
Health in shambles
16 Feb, 2026

Health in shambles

PAKISTAN’S health sector is no longer merely under strain, it is in complete disarray. The Pakistan Medical...
Destroying heritage
16 Feb, 2026

Destroying heritage

THE state seems confused about how to protect Pakistan’s historical treasures. While it rightly advertises...
Protest or strategy?
Updated 15 Feb, 2026

Protest or strategy?

By addressing legitimate concerns, the govt can lower political temperatures and boost democratic norms.
Crimes of greed
15 Feb, 2026

Crimes of greed

AN insidious mode of dispossession by influential criminals has redrawn the limits of power and control in Karachi....
Silencing Palestine
15 Feb, 2026

Silencing Palestine

MOST Western governments have staunchly defended Israel on the world stage, even as it was committing genocide in...
Dawn News English

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp