The net effect of theseinnovations in the sciences of man and of nature was liberating. Whatever each specialty or subspecialty meant to its practitioners, the persons who carry in their minds the generalculture of an age took the new message to mean that the universe, formerly closed and complete like a machine, had been reopened and shown to be more alive than dead—and by the same token more mysterious, full of questions to be resolved by new research and new sciences. The term astrophysics, replacing astronomy, symbolized the change of perspective from Newton’s cosmology to Einstein’s. In turn, these conclusions furnished a new opportunity for the exercise of individual thought and will in the realm of mind and spirit, ofethics and religion. Man was no longer deemed an automaton, he had free choice in the all-important matters that lay outsidephysical science.

In philosophy, politics, andcriticism this reexamination may be called thepragmatic revolution; in social andmoral life, the liquidation of Victorianism. But thePragmatic Revolution must not be thought of as being only the work of those who, like James, called themselves pragmatists. Nietzsche, Samuel Butler, Shaw, Bergson, and othersconstitute the headwaters of the stream of thought that issues in present-day existentialism. The common features are the turning away from absolutes and unities topluralisms and the method of testing by consequences. Subjective and objective tests looking to future thought and action—not authority or antecedents—are to decide what is true, good, and beautiful.

Such an outlook, of which the refinements are, like the defects, beyond the scope of this article, is the logical and appropriate one for an age of reconstruction. It boils down to trying all things new and holding fast to that which is good; but it presupposes the creation of new things to try, and here it is allied to the liquidation of Victorianism. Inmorals the work of destruction generally begins by affirming the opposite of the accepted rule. An excellent source book for this attitude isSamuel Butler’sThe Way of All Flesh, written in 1885 but not published until 1903. The Victorian Tennyson had said: “’Tis better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all.” Butler said: “’Tis better to have loved and lost than never to have lost at all.” This inversion of values—don’t weep over loss; there are plenty of loves to be had and the more the merrier—is but an indication of method. At first the denial was uttered as humor and paradox: Butler’sNote-books, Shaw’sArms and the Man (the soldier wants chocolate, not ammunition), Wilde’sThe Importance of Being Earnest, Jarry’sUbu roi, Strindberg’s tragicomedies—to cite but a few subverters of the Victorian—all usedderision and topsy-turviness to make their point.

Underneath the joke was the new purpose, which soon found open expression in positive utterance and action. In the plays of Hauptmann and Brieux, the novels and anticipations ofH.G. Wells, the essays of Tolstoy, Péguy,Georges Sorel,Ellen Key,Havelock Ellis, Unamuno, Ortega y Gasset, or Shaw, the new modes of feeling and the new scale of virtues and vices are set forth with as much earnestness and vigor as the old Victorian kind.

Nor did action wait until all the books were out. From theonset of the overturn, say 1885 onward, the rebellion was a biographical fact. Individuals bravedpublic opinion and got divorced, lived together unmarried, practiced and preached contraception, studied the psychology of sex, and defended homosexuality. Or again, the sons of the rich turned socialist, became labor leaders, and fomented syndicalist (i.e., direct-action) strikes, while the daughters demanded the vote as suffragists, assaulted policemen, and went to jail for chaining themselves to the door handles of government offices. Meanwhile, students rioted about international incidents or university affairs; schools were subjected to the devastation of the softer pedagogies; “rational clothing” exhibited itself in spite of derision, like the bicycle and the newfangled automobile; and newcults multiplied like mushrooms—outdoor sports, nudism, Theosophy,Esoteric Buddhism, Rosicrucianism,New Thought, the Society for Psychical Research,Christian Science, theSalvation Army, and the “Maximinism” of Stefan George.

Of these, hardly any need explanation here. But a word must be added aboutTheosophy if only because of its historical importance in developing Yeats’s genius and for expressing once again the attraction that the “wisdom of the East” has for Westerners. Not that the doctrine elaborated by Madame Blavatsky rested on any exact knowledge of Hindu religion and philosophy. That is not its point. The point is rather that Theosophy supplied the need for quietude, mystery, transcendence, and immortality in the wearied souls of Europeans. In Theosophy the doctrine of reincarnation offers satisfaction of immortal longings and inspires to wisdom, the demands of which are periodically revealed by mahatmas, or holy men.

As for the poetStefan George’s worship of his young friend Maximin, who died at age 15, it answers a similar impulse to permanent truth but with the additional urge to abolish (rather than escape) “contemporary materialism.” George was but one among many European writers who wanted to found a new society in place of the actual one. What has fitly been called the politics of cultural despair fastened on a great many saviors as the new hope—monarchy, “integral nationalism,” a newaristocracy (usually tinged with intellect), technocracy (rule by science and the engineers), the proletariat (in syndicalist “cells” or communist collectives), trade and professional guilds federated in acorporate state, or again the mystic unity of “blood” and “race.” In all these creeds, at least at their beginnings, the thirst for the ideal is evident; together they formed a new utopianism, of which the later fruits are familiar but quite other than those predicted: Soviet and Chinese communism, Italian fascism, GermanNational Socialism. As the 20th century ends, the echoes and offshoots of this earlier wave of cultist thought are found in many places. Attitudes and practices derived from the East (Zen, Yoga, meditation) are taken for granted as permanent elements of Western pluralist culture, part of the broad offering of “life-styles.”

In one country, as the 19th century passed into the 20th, all the violent rival energies seeking an ideal found an unexpected outlet. The occasion for battle was theconviction of a French officer for espionage; i.e., theDreyfus affair. Its cultural suggestiveness is apparent: on one side, the ideal ofjustice and the regard for the individual as an end in himself; on the other, the social orcollective ideal typified by the army and the nation; throughout, the ideal of truth—the facts—pursued, lost, and found again in an embittered struggle that threw up a host ofendemic prejudices—about race, about class, for and against intellect—to say nothing of individual egotisms andobsessions that had been charged with the force of pent-up aggression.