Gordon v. Johnson and Castaneda v. Souza
In Gordon v. Johnson, the ACLU and its partners successfully argued the government could not hold a category of noncitizens in mandatory, no-bond detention while their immigration cases are being resolved. Since 2014, the case has allowed some 200 noncitizens to be reunited with their families after showing that they did not pose a danger or flight risk that warranted detention during their immigration proceedings.
One of these noncitizens was Clayton Gordon, a lawful permanent resident and U.S. army veteran who was detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and subjected to mandatory detention on the basis of a drug crime, even though five years had passed since he was released from criminal custody for that crime. He had since become a home-owner and business-owner and was raising a three-year-old son.
The ACLU obtained an order that required Mr. Gordon to have a bond hearing, and he was subsequently released on bond and reunited with his family. It also obtained a class-wide ruling making some 150 Massachusetts detainees a year eligible for individual bond hearings. Rather than being held in “mandatory” immigration detention, without a hearing, these noncitizens may now be released if an immigration judge concludes that they do not pose a danger or flight risk.
Meanwhile, in Castaneda v. Souza, a related case, the ACLU successfully argued as amicus that the government had improperly detained Leiticia Castaneda without an individual bond hearing. The case resulted in Ms. Castaneda’s release.
The government appealed the Gordon and Castaneda rulings to the First Circuit. In 2015 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, sitting en banc (as a full court), upheld by a tied vote the two district court decisions rejecting the government’s interpretation of the mandatory detention provision. That meant Gordon and Castaneda were not subject to mandatory detention, and could continue to live with their families while their immigration cases were being resolved.
In November 2016, the First Circuit considered the government’s appeal of the district court’s order granting bond hearings to a class of noncitizens like Mr. Gordon. The Court remanded the case to the district court for further proceedings. Although the Court vacated the injunction that guarantees bond hearings to class members, that portion of its ruling is not immediately in effect and class members must continue to receive bond hearings under the district court’s May 2014 injunction.
Media
UPDATE: On December 12, 2018, Gordon's five-and-a-half year battle with deportation finally ended with a ruling that he and his family can remain together in the United States. Read our statement here.
Attorney(s)
Documents
- pdfApril 2017 - Status Hearing
- pdfFeb. 2017 - Order re: Motion for Interim Relief
- pdfJan. 2017 - Christopher Cronen Affidavit
- pdfDec. 2015 - En Banc Opinion from First Circuit
- pdfMarch 2015 - Government Supplement Reply Brief
- pdfMarch 2015 - ACLU Supplemental Reply Brief for Mr. Gordon
- pdfMarch 2015 - Government Supplemental Appellate Brief
- pdfFeb. 2015 - Amicus Brief of Former Immigration Judges and DHS Officials
- pdfFeb. 2015 - ACLU Supplemental Appellate Brief for Mr. Gordon
- pdfJan. 2015 - Government's Petition for Rehearing En Banc
- pdfOct. 2014 - Panel Opinion of the First Circuit (Vacated)
- pdfJune 2014 - Government's reply brief at the First Circuit
- pdfMay 2014 - Amicus Brief of Immigration Law Professors et al.
- pdfMay 2014 - District Court Summary Judgment Order
- pdfMay 2014 - ACLU Appellate Brief for Mr. Gordon
- pdfApril 2014 - Government Opening Appellate Brief
- pdfApril 2014 - Amicus Brief of ACLU et al.
- pdfMarch 2014 - District Court Order Certifying Class
- pdfDec. 2013 - District Court Memorandum on Grant of Habeas Corpus
- pdfOct. 2013 - District Court Order Granting Writ of Habeas Corpus
- pdfAugust 2013 - Complaint
Related content

Federal Court Blocks Trump Birthright Citizenship Order, Certifies...
July 10, 2025
Groups File Nationwide Class-Action Lawsuit Over Trump Birthright...
June 27, 2025
Rümeysa Öztürk To Be Freed from Detention as Case Proceeds
May 9, 2025
Appeals Court to Consider Stay of Rümeysa Öztürk’s Transfer to Vermont
April 29, 2025
Court Rules Rümeysa Öztürk’s Lawsuit Should Move Forward in Vermont...
April 18, 2025
Court Rules Rümeysa Öztürk’s Lawsuit Should Move Forward in Vermont
April 4, 2025
Court hears arguments on the unconstitutional ICE detention of...
April 3, 2025In New Filing, Rümeysa Öztürk Urges Court to Protect Her Rights,...
March 28, 2025