Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.

Academia.eduAcademia.edu

A Phonological Overview of the Hebbar Iyengar language

Profile image of Arvind IyengarArvind Iyengar
https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1703.6488
visibility

description

29 pages

link

1 file

Sign up for access to the world's latest research

checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact

Abstract

The language variety of the Hebbar Iyengar community of Karnataka (henceforth ‘Hebbar’) is a minority Dravidian language variety (no reliable statistics; unofficial estimates ~ 100,000 speakers) spoken in the areas of southern Karnataka where the community has traditionally been based (Bangalore, Mysore, Mandya, Haasan and Tumkur districts in particular). It is closely related to standard Tamil, but has been significantly influenced by Kannada, particularly in terms of lexicon. ***Based on oral or anecdotal evidence, it is generally believed that Hebbar split from Medieval Tamil—the ancestor of Modern Tamil—around the 13th century AD, with the supposed migration of its speakers from Tamil Nadu into Karnataka. This has meant that the language has developed independently from modern standard Tamil, or indeed most recognised varieties of Tamil spoken in Tamil Nadu. ***This paper will phonemically (and, where required, phonetically) analyse the following aspects of Hebbar: (i) comparison of phonemic inventory with that of standard Tamil; (ii) comparisons of pronouns, person-number-gender (PNG) markers, and non-PNG markers in Hebbar with those of standard Tamil; (iii) comparison of word-final nasalisation with standard Tamil; (iv) concept of surface and underlying phonetic forms; (v) vowel harmony; (vi) vowel lowering before retroflexes; (vii) phonemic assimilation of borrowings from Kannada and other contact languages.

Figures (9)

The classification of the Hebbar variety in relation to other Tamil-related varieties is given below in Fig. 1 (adapted from Ramanujan (1968)).
The classification of the Hebbar variety in relation to other Tamil-related varieties is given below in Fig. 1 (adapted from Ramanujan (1968)).
According to legend, the Hebbar Iyengars migrated from the Tamil-speaking town of Srirangam to the Kannada-speaking town of Melukote sometime in the 12" century CE (see Fig. 2). Due to this resettlement, the Tamil spoken by the community developed along a path separate from the Tamil used in traditional Tamil-speaking areas, and due to its new linguistic surroundings also came to be heavily influenced by Kannada.
According to legend, the Hebbar Iyengars migrated from the Tamil-speaking town of Srirangam to the Kannada-speaking town of Melukote sometime in the 12" century CE (see Fig. 2). Due to this resettlement, the Tamil spoken by the community developed along a path separate from the Tamil used in traditional Tamil-speaking areas, and due to its new linguistic surroundings also came to be heavily influenced by Kannada.
Table 1: Transcription key for literary Tamil  Table 1 shows the transcription key used for literary Tamil. When more than one IPA value exists, these values represent allophonic realisations of the letters, for instance, when occurring word-medially, when occurring immediately after a homorganic nasal, or when occurring as a geminate consonant.
Table 1: Transcription key for literary Tamil Table 1 shows the transcription key used for literary Tamil. When more than one IPA value exists, these values represent allophonic realisations of the letters, for instance, when occurring word-medially, when occurring immediately after a homorganic nasal, or when occurring as a geminate consonant.
The inventory of Hebbar vowels is as follows —  4. Phonology
The inventory of Hebbar vowels is as follows — 4. Phonology
The inventory of Hebbar consonants is as follows —  If one goes by the Indian grammatical tradition, the vowel-semivowel combinations /9j/ and /aw/ would have to be classified as diphthongs, and formally included under vowels. However, apart from these two combinations, [9] only occurs as a word-medial unstressed allophone of the short vowels /e/, /i/ and /w/.
The inventory of Hebbar consonants is as follows — If one goes by the Indian grammatical tradition, the vowel-semivowel combinations /9j/ and /aw/ would have to be classified as diphthongs, and formally included under vowels. However, apart from these two combinations, [9] only occurs as a word-medial unstressed allophone of the short vowels /e/, /i/ and /w/.
Gemination is phonemic in Hebbar, as is attested by the following (near) minimal pairs —  /y/ occurs phonemically only in rare cases, such as in the Sanskrit-origin word /va:nmajc ‘literature’. Otherwise, [1] and [n] are allophones of /n/ immediately before a velar and denta stop respectively. The palatal nasal /p/, which is at least nominally a part of the Tami Kannada’ and Sanskrit phonemic inventories, does not occur at all in Hebbar, whethe independently or in combination with other consonants. For instance, Skt. /pancemi:/ ‘fift lunar day’ is realised as H /penteomi/. Similarly, the Sanskrit consonant combination /jp. such as in Skt. /jna:poka/ ‘rememberance’, is realised in Hebbar as /gj/ > H /gja:poku/ (c1 ST [pa:bagbd], K /gna:poke/).  7 Sridhar (2007) does not list /p/ as an independent phoneme in Kannada (p. 291) and labels it a ‘lamino- alveolar’ allophone of the otherwise ‘apico-alveolar’ nasal stop /n/ (p. 293).
Gemination is phonemic in Hebbar, as is attested by the following (near) minimal pairs — /y/ occurs phonemically only in rare cases, such as in the Sanskrit-origin word /va:nmajc ‘literature’. Otherwise, [1] and [n] are allophones of /n/ immediately before a velar and denta stop respectively. The palatal nasal /p/, which is at least nominally a part of the Tami Kannada’ and Sanskrit phonemic inventories, does not occur at all in Hebbar, whethe independently or in combination with other consonants. For instance, Skt. /pancemi:/ ‘fift lunar day’ is realised as H /penteomi/. Similarly, the Sanskrit consonant combination /jp. such as in Skt. /jna:poka/ ‘rememberance’, is realised in Hebbar as /gj/ > H /gja:poku/ (c1 ST [pa:bagbd], K /gna:poke/). 7 Sridhar (2007) does not list /p/ as an independent phoneme in Kannada (p. 291) and labels it a ‘lamino- alveolar’ allophone of the otherwise ‘apico-alveolar’ nasal stop /n/ (p. 293).
Relatively few Tamil-origin words containing <c> are pronounced with an /s/ in Hebbar.  As mentioned earlier, there is an orthographic distinction in LT between the dental and alveolar stops. Since <r> was traditionally an alveolar stop, but has become a rhotic in modern ST, it is referred to as an alveolar rhotic. Conversely, <r> is referred to as a ‘dental’ rhotic. In terms of pronunciation, though, there is no difference between the two in modern  ST. No such distinction exists in Hebbar either. In other words, there is only one rhotic in Hebbar.
Relatively few Tamil-origin words containing <c> are pronounced with an /s/ in Hebbar. As mentioned earlier, there is an orthographic distinction in LT between the dental and alveolar stops. Since <r> was traditionally an alveolar stop, but has become a rhotic in modern ST, it is referred to as an alveolar rhotic. Conversely, <r> is referred to as a ‘dental’ rhotic. In terms of pronunciation, though, there is no difference between the two in modern ST. No such distinction exists in Hebbar either. In other words, there is only one rhotic in Hebbar.

Related papers

Pronouns and grammatical markers in Hebbar Tamil

The Tamil variety spoken by the Hebbar Iyengar community of Karnataka (henceforth ‘Hebbar Tamil’ or ‘HT’) is a minority language variety (no reliable statistics; unofficial estimates ~ 50,000 speakers) traditionally spoken in southern Karnataka, where the majority of community members still reside. Based on community legends that describe their out-migration from Srirangam town in present-day Tamil Nadu and subsequent settlement in and around Melukote town in present-day Karnataka, it is hypothesised that Hebbar Tamil split from Middle Tamil (the basis for Literary Tamil or ‘LT’) around the 13th century AD. This has meant that HT has developed independently of modern Spoken Tamil (ST) in Tamil Nadu. *** HT has been most significantly influenced by standard Kannada, which is the majority language spoken in the community’s traditional areas of residence. However, Kannada influence on the language has remained largely lexical; the core vocabulary of HT including function words and pronouns, person-number-gender (PNG) and tense-aspect-mood (TAM) markers remain perceptibly of Tamil origin. That said, pronouns and grammatical markers in HT have indeed undergone some degree of phonetic change, such that they are no longer identical to their counterparts in modern ST. *** This paper will compare and contrast pronouns and PNG-TAM markers in HT with those in LT and ST. This will include, among other things, a comparison of the divergent evolution of LT word-final nasal stops on pronouns and grammatical markers in HT and ST, e.g. (i) LT <nāṉ> --> ST /nãː/, HT /naːnʉ/ ‘I’, but (ii) LT <pōkirēṉ>  ST /poːrɛ̃ː/, HT /poːreː/ ‘I go’ *** It will also discuss the concept of surface and underlying forms, namely the variation in phonetic forms of a grammatical marker with and without morphological suffixes, e.g. (i) LT <paṇṇukiṟāṉ> --> ST [pɐɳɳʉrɑ̃ː], HT [pɐɳɳʉrʊ] ‘he does’, but (ii) LT <paṇṇukiṟāṉā> --> ST [pɐɳɳʉrɑːnɑː], HT [pɐɳɳʉrɑːnɑː] ‘does he do?’

A reference grammar of spoken Tamil

1999

Tamil and other South Dravidian languages are somewhat unique in that they possess three phonological contrasts in the area of what are usually referred to as r-like segments (continuants, trills, flaps, etc.) as well as two contrasts in the lateral area. Because of an unfortunate lack of uniformity in the transcriptional systems that have been used to describe these segments, and because of other tendencies that are difficult to group under one rubric, the question of what is an "r" and what is not an "r" has been historically unclear. It is the goal of this paper to attempt to clear up the question of both the phonetics and the phonology of continuants and laterals in Tamil and to some extent in the other South Dravidian languages that have similar contrasts.

Contribution of Tamil to Phonetics and Phonology

2025

The study of ‘Linguistics as a subject’ has gained importance in Europe since the beginning of 19th century; now it has been well established among the scholars and academicians world-over and has attained the level of ‘Higher Research’. However, the study and research by linguists are around English and other European languages. Tamil is one of the ancient languages of the world; its history surpasses that of the languages like the Sumerian and Akkadian, which are non-existent now while Tamil is a living language. It has a large treasure of grammar and literature commencing from the first millennium B.C. However, its grammar has received less attention from the linguists. The aspects of Phonetics, Phonology, Morphology and Syntax have been well explained in Tamil, in its grammar work Tholkᾱppiyam. Linguistic aspects of Tamil, if learnt by the Universities and Students, it will be of enormous help for the study of Linguistics as a subject. This paper is an attempt to elaborate the Phonetical and Phonological aspects of Tamil

Exploring the Phonology of Indic Languages

India is a tableau of languages, cultures, faiths, even so-called races and one comes across striking richness of sound-systems in Indic languages. The present essay attempts to demonstrate that despite multiplicity and diversity of languages across various regions in the country, there is a strong element of commonality in the employment of phonological segments across Indic. There is rich material available on the ground for young researchers desirous of pursuing phonological investigations across Indic. The field is open to exploring segmental phonology, morpho-phonology, tonology, 'tone-Sandhi', stress assignment patterns, and other aspects of phonology.

A Note on Indo-Aryan Phonology

The earliest written records available on the sub-continent come to us from Sanskrit; in fact RgVeda is regarded as the earliest knowledge-text available to mankind. The Indo-Aryan languages, the descendents of Sanskrit, are spoken across South Asia from Afghanistan to Sri Lanka along side scores of languages of at least three other major language families. A great deal of convergence has taken place among these languages from different stocks over the last over three millennia and they continue to co-exist while maintaining their independent genetic affiliations.

Phonology and Phonetics of L2 Telugu English

Studies in Linguistics and Literature, 2021

The paper provides a partial phonological and phonetic description of the segmental system of L2 Telugu English (TE). Previous research on the subject has been carried out in the context of a more general notion of Indian English (IE), so the properties of TE as distinct from other varieties of IE (e.g., Gujarati English) have largely remained unexplored. We have primarily focused on areas that previous research identified as prominent issues in the study of IE: vowel inventory and production, representation and realization of liquids, word-final obstruent phenomena, and allophones of /w/. To account for these aspects of TE, we have combined a generative approach to the study of an individual's linguistic competence with linguistic fieldwork as a means of collecting first-hand data. On the basis of collected data, we have conducted a spectrographic analysis of TE vowels and a distributional analysis of TE consonants. The paper provides the first description of the acoustic spaces of TE vowels. We found that all vowels except [ɔ] and [i] are more central in TE than in General American English. /r/ was realized as either [r] or [ɻ] without a specific pattern, and occasionally as [ɽ] in the intervocalic position. /l/ was realized as [ɭ] in word-final position and as [l] elsewhere. TE displayed word-final obstruent devoicing for all obstruents except for /b/, which was consistently unreleased. /w/ was realized as [ʋ] before front vowels and as [w] elsewhere. While previous research that concentrated on the broad notion of Indian English recognized the issue of /w/-allophony, it has not provided a principle that governs the exact distribution of /w/'s allophones. By combining the generative framework with linguistic fieldwork, we have accounted for this long-standing puzzle with a single rule: /w/ → [ʋ] / __ [-CONS, -BACK].

The phonology of verbal forms in colloquial Ceylon Tamil

1972

Recently there was a controversy among the Ceylon linguists, writers and teachers on the use of colloquial style in literary works. The history of this controversy is worthy of notice. For many centuries, there has been an active relationship between the Ceylon Tamil scholars and their counterparts in Tamil Nadu. Ceylon Tamil scholars like Arumuka Navalar, Thamotharam Pillai, Kathiravel Pillai, Swami Vipulananda, were honoured in Tamil Nadu. Swami Vipulananda was highly honoured for his scholarship by being offered the Chair of Tamil in Annamalai University. He was privileged not only to be the first Tamil to become a Professor of Tamil at Annamalai University, but also to be the first Ceylonese to hold that post. Indian Tamil scholars have always been welcomed in Ceylon. The relationship that existed was so much related that the Ceylonese began calling the South Indian Tamil territory as ta:yna:tu ('mother land') and Ceylon Tamil territory as se:yna:tu (child's land). Until the middle part of this century, Ceylon Tamils consciously or unconsciously have thought that their 'mother land' is Tamil Nadu. But during the mid-fifties of this century, Ceylon Tamils began to recognize that Ceylon is their homeland and the struggle for their language rights in the island strengthened this national feeling. Ceylon scholars began to think in terms of 'Ceylon tradition' 'here in this place' and says: "The voiceless velar stop is palatalised into 'c' on account of the front high unrounded vowel ". We are not told whether this is a general feature in the dialect or it applies only in this instance. His paper contains many statements of this sort, which, although they have the appearance of general statements, are in fact not so. Zvelebil was the first to make an attempt to describe all the major dialects of Ceylon Tamil. Since he had attempted to do this task in a short paper, there is a possibility for him to confuse a feature of one dialect with that of the

Indic Phonology

India is a tableau of languages, cultures, faiths, even so-called races and one comes across striking richness of sound-systems in Indic languages. The present essay attempts to demonstrate that despite multiplicity and diversity of languages across various regions in the country, there is a strong element of commonality in the employment of phonological segments across Indic. There is rich material available on the ground for young researchers desirous of pursuing phonological investigations across Indic. The field is open to exploring segmental phonology, morpho-phonology, tonology, 'tone-Sandhi', stress assignment patterns, and other aspects of phonology.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (15)

  1. Abbi, A. (2008). Tribal Languages. In B. B. Kachru, Y. Kachru, & S. N. Sridhar (Eds.), Language in South Asia (pp. 153-174). New Delhi: Cambridge University Press.
  2. Bayer, J. M. (2007 [1990]). Language and Social Identity. In D. P. Pattanayak (Ed.), Multilingualism in India (pp. 101-111). New Delhi: Orient Longman.
  3. Bright, W., & Ramanujan, A. K. (1964). Sociolinguistic Variation and Language Change. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of Linguists, (pp. 1107-1114). Cambridge, Mass.
  4. Lehmann, T. (1989). A Grammar of Modern Tamil. Pondicherry: Pondicherry Institute of Lingustics and Culture.
  5. Lewis, M. P., Simons, G. F., & Fennig, C. D. (Eds.). (2013). Ethnologue: Languages of the World (17th ed.). Dallas, TX, USA: SIL International.
  6. Meenakshisundaran, T. P. (1965). A History of the Tamil Language. Pune: Deccan College.
  7. Ramanujan, A. K. (1968). Spoken and Written Tamil: The Verb. Chicago: University of Chicago.
  8. Ramanujan, A. K. (2007 [1968]). The Structure of Variation: A Study in Caste Dialects. In M. B. Singer, & B. S. Cohn (Eds.), Structure and Change in Indian Society (pp. 461-474). New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
  9. Schiffman, H. F. (1979). A Reference Grammar of Spoken Kannada. Washington DC: Bureau of Postsecondary Education.
  10. Schiffman, H. F. (1999). A Reference Grammar of Spoken Tamil. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Schiffman, H. F. (1998). Standardization or Restandardization: The Case for "Standard" Spoken Tamil. Language in Society , 27 (3), 359-385.
  12. Sridhar, S. N. (2007). Modern Kannada Grammar. New Delhi: Manohar.
  13. Sriram, V. (2004). A Brief Survey of Hebbar Tamil's Verb Morphology. Language in India , 4 (8). University of Madras. (1936). Tamil Lexicon. Chennai. Retrieved from http://dsal.uchicago.edu/dictionaries/tamil-lex/
  14. Zvelebil, K. V. (1964). Spoken Languages of Tamilnad. Archiv Orientálni , 32 (2), 237-64.
  15. Zvelebil, K. V. (1970). Tamil. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Current Trends in Linguistics (Vol. 5, pp. 343-371). The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.

Related papers

Review of North East Indian Linguistics: Volume 3. Gwendolyn Hyslop, Stephen Morey, and Mark W. Post, eds. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press India Pvt. Ltd. 2011

European Bulletin of Himalayan Research, 2012

Sounds and Their Patterns in Indic languages Volumes 1 & 2
Languages of North East India: A Comparative and Contrastive Analysis on Some of the Phonological Features

International Journal of Linguistics, 2013

English spoken by the Speakers of Dravidian Languages: A phonetic Analysis
On some features of consonants in Indian English

2011

On a description of the phonology of Indian English
Developments in Indian Linguistcs: Phonology
North East Indian Linguistics Volume 3

2011. New Delhi, Cambridge University Press India (Hardcover, 253 + xxii pp.; ISBN: 978-81-7596-793-9), 2011

Malayalam and core Dravidian phonology: A view from early language acquisition

2023

North East Indian Linguistics Volume 5

2013. New Delhi, Cambridge University Press India (Hardcover, 303 + xvii pp.; ISBN: 978-93-8226-472-9)

On Tamil “Secondary Phones” (Cārpeḻuttu-s) –1: the aikārak kuṟukkam “reduced ai”

2015

Indigenous grammatical traditions Tamil and the Dravdian.docx
Change in Progress: Phonology of Marathi-Hindi contact in ( astern Vidarbha

2014

Phonological Analysis of Indian Language
Phonological Uniformity in Indic Languages
LANGUAGE IN INDIA Strength for Today and Bright Hope for Tomorrow The Investigation of Phonological Processes in Mashhadi Dialect
‘Urappiyum eṭuttum kaṉaittum (உரப்பியும் எடுத்தும் கனைத்தும்)’ : Contrastive Phonetics or how to describe one language with the help of another one

2011

Kurtöp phonology in the context of Northeast India

North East Indian Linguistics, 2008

Konnerth, Linda, Stephen Morey, Priyankoo Sarmah and Amos Teo (eds.) 2015. North East Indian Linguistics, 7. Canberra: Australia-Pacific Linguistics, Language and Peoples of the Eastern Himalaya Region (series).
North East Indian Linguistics 6

Asia-Pacific Linguistics Open Access, 2014

The influence of Dravidian on Indo-Aryan phonetics

Jared S. Klein – Kazuhiko Yoshida (eds.): Indic Across the Millennia: from the Rigveda to Modern Indo-Aryan, pp. 145-152, 2013

Hyslop, Gwendolyn, Stephen Morey and Mark W. Post (eds). 2011. North East Indian Linguistics, Volume 3. Delhi: Cambridge University Press, India.

2009

Methods in Historical linguistics: Evidences from Tamil epigraphic texts

2013

[−anterior] as a natural phonological class: Evidence from Sanskrit and Gujarati re-examined.
A Comparative Phonological Study of the Dialects of Hindi

2011

Related topics

Phonology
Academia
Academia
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp