Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.

Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Jarrige, J.-F., Didier, A. & Quivron, G. (2011) Shahr-i Sokhta and the Chronology of the Indo-Iranian Borderlands. Paléorient 37 (2) : 7-34.

Profile image of Gonzague QuivronGonzague QuivronProfile image of Aurore DidierAurore Didier
visibility

…

description

28 pages

link

1 file

Sign up for access to the world's latest research

checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact

Abstract

In an article published in 2008 in Paléorient, a series of arguments have been listed which would allow dating the last phase Résumé : Dans un article publié en 2008 dans Paléorient, une série d'arguments a été présentée pour dater la phase fi nale de la période III et la période IV de Shahr-i Sokhta au cours de la seconde moitié du III e millénaire et au tout début du II e millénaire av. J.-C. Une telle datation pourrait impliquer de possibles interactions entre les sites du système de l'Helmand (Shahr-i Sokhta et Mundigak) et la civilisation de l'Indus. Cet article nous conduit tout d'abord à un examen d'ensemble des questions chronologiques à l'échelle des régions indo-iraniennes. Nous passons ensuite en revue les éléments utilisés par les auteurs de l'article précédent pour soutenir une contemporanéité entre les sites de l'Helmand aux périodes III et IV de Shahr-i Sokhta et la civilisation de l'Indus. Puis, en nous fondant notamment sur la séquence des sites de la bordure occidentale de la vallée de l'Indus et du Makran, nous examinons le bienfondé de ces rapprochements proposés entre Shahr-i Sokhta et les sites de la civilisation de l'Indus. Sample Region Site / period 14C Age BP 68 % (1σ) cal BC ranges 95.4 % (2σ) cal BC ranges Beta 18843*

FAQs

sparkles

AI

What new evidence supports the dating of Shahr-i Sokhta's occupation periods?add

Recent excavations by S.M.S. Sajjadi revealed tombs at Shahr-i Sokhta dating to Period IV, providing clearer chronological links with Mehrgarh and Nausharo, suggesting continuity in cultural trends.

How does Shahr-i Sokhta relate to the Helmand civilization?add

The study indicates that Shahr-i Sokhta may be contemporaneous with key Helmand sites, with evidence linking its pottery styles and cultural artifacts to the Helmand River hydrographic system.

What is the significance of bichrome and polychrome pottery in this research?add

The introduction of bichrome and polychrome pottery in the region indicates complex exchange networks, particularly in the tradition of decoration techniques emerging around the mid-4th millennium BC.

What methodologies were used for the analysis of ceramic sequences in this study?add

The research employed calibrated radiocarbon dating and stratigraphic comparisons across various key archaeological sites to critically evaluate periods of occupation and cultural exchange.

What are the implications of vessel designs found at Shahr-i Sokhta?add

Vessels displayed stylistic links to both local and regional traditions, revealing a dynamic exchange of artistic concepts and techniques across the Indo-Iranian region during the 3rd millennium BC.

Figures (22)
Fig. 1 —- Map of the Indo-Iranian Borderlands with archaeological sites mentioned in the text
Fig. 1 —- Map of the Indo-Iranian Borderlands with archaeological sites mentioned in the text
Table 1 - “C datings from Nausharo IB-C and Makran IIIb-IIc. * Radiocarbon dating: Laboratory Beta Analytic, Miami, Florida; ** Radiocarbon dating: Laboratory AMS, University of Arizona, Tucson
Table 1 - “C datings from Nausharo IB-C and Makran IIIb-IIc. * Radiocarbon dating: Laboratory Beta Analytic, Miami, Florida; ** Radiocarbon dating: Laboratory AMS, University of Arizona, Tucson
Fig. 2 — Togau ware with motifs of stylized caprids. 1-2, Buff reddish ware from Mehrgarh III (C. JARRIGE et al., 1995: fig. 3.2, a-c); 3-5, 7-8, Ceramics from Mundigak I (CASAL, 1961: fig. 49.9, 11-12, fig. 50.26, 29a); 6, 9, Ceramics from Sarazm (ISAKOV et LYONNET, 1988: pl. I, 2-3).
Fig. 2 — Togau ware with motifs of stylized caprids. 1-2, Buff reddish ware from Mehrgarh III (C. JARRIGE et al., 1995: fig. 3.2, a-c); 3-5, 7-8, Ceramics from Mundigak I (CASAL, 1961: fig. 49.9, 11-12, fig. 50.26, 29a); 6, 9, Ceramics from Sarazm (ISAKOV et LYONNET, 1988: pl. I, 2-3).
Fig. 3 — Bowls decorated with “pseudo-swastika” motifs. 1-6, Ceramics from Shahr-i Sokhta cemetery, Period I (SAJJADI, 2003: fig. 26); 7-9, Ceramics from Nilag (Dasht Plain, Makran), Period Illa (MUTIN, 2007 : fig. 1.278, 12-14).
Fig. 3 — Bowls decorated with “pseudo-swastika” motifs. 1-6, Ceramics from Shahr-i Sokhta cemetery, Period I (SAJJADI, 2003: fig. 26); 7-9, Ceramics from Nilag (Dasht Plain, Makran), Period Illa (MUTIN, 2007 : fig. 1.278, 12-14).
Fig. 4 - Truncated-conical goblets with polychrome or monochrome painted decorations. 1-3, Ceramics from Mehrgarh IV-V (drawings MAI); 4, Ceramic from Tal-i Iblis (SARRAF, 1981: abb. 26); 5-6, Ceramics from Makran, Period Ila (MUTIN, 2007: fig. I1.194, n° 13-14); 7, Ceramics from Sohr-Damb/Nal I (FRANKE-VOGT, 2005: abb. 8).
Fig. 4 - Truncated-conical goblets with polychrome or monochrome painted decorations. 1-3, Ceramics from Mehrgarh IV-V (drawings MAI); 4, Ceramic from Tal-i Iblis (SARRAF, 1981: abb. 26); 5-6, Ceramics from Makran, Period Ila (MUTIN, 2007: fig. I1.194, n° 13-14); 7, Ceramics from Sohr-Damb/Nal I (FRANKE-VOGT, 2005: abb. 8).
Fig. 7 — Polychrome ware from Sharh-i Sokhta II (SALVATORI and VIDALE, 1997: fig. 161; SAJJADI, 2003: fig. 30). Fig. 6 — Dasht polychrome ware from Makran IIIb (drawings MAFM).
Fig. 7 — Polychrome ware from Sharh-i Sokhta II (SALVATORI and VIDALE, 1997: fig. 161; SAJJADI, 2003: fig. 30). Fig. 6 — Dasht polychrome ware from Makran IIIb (drawings MAFM).
Fig. 5 — Nal polychrome ware from Balochistan. 1-4 (FAIRSERVIS, 1975: fig. 40); 5-7 (FRANKE-VOGT, 2005: fig. 60).
Fig. 5 — Nal polychrome ware from Balochistan. 1-4 (FAIRSERVIS, 1975: fig. 40); 5-7 (FRANKE-VOGT, 2005: fig. 60).
Fig. 8 — Polychrome ware from Mehrgarh VB, VIIA-B and from Nausharo IA-B (drawings MAI).
Fig. 8 — Polychrome ware from Mehrgarh VB, VIIA-B and from Nausharo IA-B (drawings MAI).
Fig. 9 — Kot-Diji pottery. 1-2, Ceramics from Mehrgarh VIA/B (drawings MAI); 3, 7, Ceramics from Nausharo I (JARRIGE, 1993: fig. 1); 4, Ceramic from Mundigak IV.1 (CASAL, 1961: fig. 75.249); 5-6, Ceramics from Harappa 1-2 (DALES, 1991: fig. 5.3).
Fig. 9 — Kot-Diji pottery. 1-2, Ceramics from Mehrgarh VIA/B (drawings MAI); 3, 7, Ceramics from Nausharo I (JARRIGE, 1993: fig. 1); 4, Ceramic from Mundigak IV.1 (CASAL, 1961: fig. 75.249); 5-6, Ceramics from Harappa 1-2 (DALES, 1991: fig. 5.3).
Fig. 10 - Terracotta female figurines. 1, Figurine from Shahr-i Sokhta II (CORTES! et al., 2008: fig. 11); 2-6, Figurines from Mehrgarh VII (photos MAI); 7-8, Figurines from Mundigak (CASAL, 1961: pl. XLI, 8-9); 9-11, Figurines from Damb-Sadaat I-III, site Q8 (FAIRSERVIS, 1956: fig. 16).
Fig. 10 - Terracotta female figurines. 1, Figurine from Shahr-i Sokhta II (CORTES! et al., 2008: fig. 11); 2-6, Figurines from Mehrgarh VII (photos MAI); 7-8, Figurines from Mundigak (CASAL, 1961: pl. XLI, 8-9); 9-11, Figurines from Damb-Sadaat I-III, site Q8 (FAIRSERVIS, 1956: fig. 16).
Fig. 11 - Terracotta cakes: 1-5 from Shahr-i Sokhta I-III (CORTES! et al., 2008: fig. 12) ; 6-14 from Nausharo IB-IC / Mehrgarh VII (drawings and photos MAI).
Fig. 11 - Terracotta cakes: 1-5 from Shahr-i Sokhta I-III (CORTES! et al., 2008: fig. 12) ; 6-14 from Nausharo IB-IC / Mehrgarh VII (drawings and photos MAI).
Fig. 12 - Bowls and dishes decorated with vegetal motifs. 1, Ceramic from Lal Shah, Period Nausharo IC (PRACCHIA, 1985: fig. 4a); 2, Ceramic from Rehman Dheri IIIB, scale not available (DURRANI, 1988: Pl. XXXVII); 3, Ceramic from Shahr-i Sokhta IV, Scale not avail- able (BISCIONE, 1990: fig. 6); 4-5, Ceramics from Nausharo IC (drawing MAI); 6, Ceramic from Miri Qalat IIIc (BESENVAL and DIDIER, 2004: fig. 8.2); 7, Ceramic from Mundigak IV.3 (CASAL, 1961: fig. 94.429); 8, 10, Ceramics from Shahr-i Sokhta IV, Grave 1705, n° 32 and 21 (SAJJADI, 2003: fig. 17); 9, Ceramic from the Dasht Plain (Makran), Period IIIb (drawing MAFM); 11, Ceramic from Mehrgarh VIIA/B (drawing MAI).
Fig. 12 - Bowls and dishes decorated with vegetal motifs. 1, Ceramic from Lal Shah, Period Nausharo IC (PRACCHIA, 1985: fig. 4a); 2, Ceramic from Rehman Dheri IIIB, scale not available (DURRANI, 1988: Pl. XXXVII); 3, Ceramic from Shahr-i Sokhta IV, Scale not avail- able (BISCIONE, 1990: fig. 6); 4-5, Ceramics from Nausharo IC (drawing MAI); 6, Ceramic from Miri Qalat IIIc (BESENVAL and DIDIER, 2004: fig. 8.2); 7, Ceramic from Mundigak IV.3 (CASAL, 1961: fig. 94.429); 8, 10, Ceramics from Shahr-i Sokhta IV, Grave 1705, n° 32 and 21 (SAJJADI, 2003: fig. 17); 9, Ceramic from the Dasht Plain (Makran), Period IIIb (drawing MAFM); 11, Ceramic from Mehrgarh VIIA/B (drawing MAI).
Fig. 13 — Pedestal beakers decorated with geometric and naturalistic motifs. 1, 5, Ceramics from Nausharo IC (drawings MAI); 3, 7-8, Buff ware from Shahr-i Sokhta IV, Grave 731, n° 8094, 8081, 8059 (PIPERNO and SALVATORI, 2007: fig. 675); 2, 4, 6, 9, Ceramics from Mundigak IV.1 (CASAL, 1961: fig. 65.179, 181-182, fig. 66.192).
Fig. 13 — Pedestal beakers decorated with geometric and naturalistic motifs. 1, 5, Ceramics from Nausharo IC (drawings MAI); 3, 7-8, Buff ware from Shahr-i Sokhta IV, Grave 731, n° 8094, 8081, 8059 (PIPERNO and SALVATORI, 2007: fig. 675); 2, 4, 6, 9, Ceramics from Mundigak IV.1 (CASAL, 1961: fig. 65.179, 181-182, fig. 66.192).
Fig. 14 - Ceramics with “fish” motifs. 1, Buff ware bowl from Shahr-i Sokhta IV, Grave 731, n° 8075 (PIPERNO and SALVATORI, 2007. fig. 681); 2, Faiz Mohammad Grey ware from Mehrgarh VIA/B (drawing MAI); 3, Streak burnished ware dish from Miri Qalat IIc (BESENVAL and DIDIER, 2004: fig. 9.5); 4, Buff ware bowl from Shahr-i Sokhta lV, Grave 1705, n° 50 (SAJJADI, 2003: fig. 17); 5, Surface potsherd from Shahr- i Sokhta (CORTES! et al., 2008: fig. 7.4); 6, Bowl from Nausharo IC (drawing MAI); 7, Pinkish buff bowl from Mundigak IV.2 (CASAL, 1961: fig. 92.398); 8, Fine ware bowl from the Dasht Plain (Makran), Period IIIb (drawing MAFM).
Fig. 14 - Ceramics with “fish” motifs. 1, Buff ware bowl from Shahr-i Sokhta IV, Grave 731, n° 8075 (PIPERNO and SALVATORI, 2007. fig. 681); 2, Faiz Mohammad Grey ware from Mehrgarh VIA/B (drawing MAI); 3, Streak burnished ware dish from Miri Qalat IIc (BESENVAL and DIDIER, 2004: fig. 9.5); 4, Buff ware bowl from Shahr-i Sokhta lV, Grave 1705, n° 50 (SAJJADI, 2003: fig. 17); 5, Surface potsherd from Shahr- i Sokhta (CORTES! et al., 2008: fig. 7.4); 6, Bowl from Nausharo IC (drawing MAI); 7, Pinkish buff bowl from Mundigak IV.2 (CASAL, 1961: fig. 92.398); 8, Fine ware bowl from the Dasht Plain (Makran), Period IIIb (drawing MAFM).
Fig. 15 - Parallels between Shahr-i Sokhta and Jiroft objects. 1, Wooden game-board from Shahr-i Sokhta IV, Grave 731, n° 8087, Scale not available (PIPERNO and SALVATORI, 2007. fig. 691); 2, “Chlorite” board from Jiroft, Scale not available (MADJIDAZADEH, 2003: 108).
Fig. 15 - Parallels between Shahr-i Sokhta and Jiroft objects. 1, Wooden game-board from Shahr-i Sokhta IV, Grave 731, n° 8087, Scale not available (PIPERNO and SALVATORI, 2007. fig. 691); 2, “Chlorite” board from Jiroft, Scale not available (MADJIDAZADEH, 2003: 108).
Fig. 16 — Fragment of “chlorite” vessel from Nausharo, Period IC (photograph MAI © C. JARRIGE).
Fig. 16 — Fragment of “chlorite” vessel from Nausharo, Period IC (photograph MAI © C. JARRIGE).
Fig. 17 — Parallels between Shahr-i Sokhta I-Ila surface seals 1-5 (CORTES! et al., 2008: fig. 13, 1 and fig. 15, 1-2, 4, 8 and Nausharo I terracotta seals 6-12 (drawings MAI).
Fig. 17 — Parallels between Shahr-i Sokhta I-Ila surface seals 1-5 (CORTES! et al., 2008: fig. 13, 1 and fig. 15, 1-2, 4, 8 and Nausharo I terracotta seals 6-12 (drawings MAI).
Fig. 18 — Parallels between canister pots decorated with ibex motifs. 1, Ceramic from Shahr-i Sokhta IV (TOSI, 1983: fig. 55); 2-7, Ceramics from Miri Qalat IIIc and IV (drawings MAFM); 8, Ceramic from Hili, tomb M (VOGT et al., 2011: fig. 53, HM/v55); 9-10, Ceramics from Hili, tomb 1059 (BIBBY, 1966: fig. 11); 11, Ceramic from Hili, tomb B (AL-TIKRITI, 1981: Pl. 81H, 3); 12, Ceramic from Hili Nord, tomb A (VOGT et al., 2011: fig. 204, DLA/v260); 13-14, Ceramics from Bampur V.2 (DE CARDI, 1970: fig. 38.361-362); 15-17, Ceramics from Bampur V1 (DE CARDI, 1970: fig. 43.477, 479, 481).
Fig. 18 — Parallels between canister pots decorated with ibex motifs. 1, Ceramic from Shahr-i Sokhta IV (TOSI, 1983: fig. 55); 2-7, Ceramics from Miri Qalat IIIc and IV (drawings MAFM); 8, Ceramic from Hili, tomb M (VOGT et al., 2011: fig. 53, HM/v55); 9-10, Ceramics from Hili, tomb 1059 (BIBBY, 1966: fig. 11); 11, Ceramic from Hili, tomb B (AL-TIKRITI, 1981: Pl. 81H, 3); 12, Ceramic from Hili Nord, tomb A (VOGT et al., 2011: fig. 204, DLA/v260); 13-14, Ceramics from Bampur V.2 (DE CARDI, 1970: fig. 38.361-362); 15-17, Ceramics from Bampur V1 (DE CARDI, 1970: fig. 43.477, 479, 481).

Related papers

E. Cortesi, M. Tosi, A. Lazzari and M. Vidale, Cultural Relationships Beyond The Iranian Plateau: the Helmand Civilization, Baluchistan and the Indus Valley in the 3rd Millennium BCE

Paléorient, 34.2, 5-35, 2008

This paper presents a systematic review of the archaeological evidence for cultural interaction between the Helmand and the Indus during the 3rd millennium BCE. A series of artefacts found at Shahr-i Sokhta and nearby sites (Iranian Seistan) that were presumably imported from Baluchistan and the Indus domain are discussed, together with fi nds from the French excavations at Mundigak (Kandahar, Afghanistan) that might have the same origin. Other artefacts and the involved technologies bear witness to the local adaptation of south-eastern manufactures and practices in the protohistoric Sistan culture. While the objects datable to the fi rst centuries of the 3rd millennium BCE fall in the so called "domestic universe" and refl ect common household activities, in the centuries that follow we see a shift to the sharing of luxury objects and activities concerning the display of a superior social status; but this might be fruit of a general transformation of the archaeological record of Shahr-i Sokhta and its formation processes.

1980. The Origins of the Indus Civilization
A new revised chronology and cultural sequence of the Swat valley, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (Pakistan) in the light of current excavations at Barikot (Bir- kot-ghwandai

Nuclear Inst. and Methods in Physics Research B, 2019

In 2016 CIRCE and the ISMEO Italian Archaeological Mission in Pakistan launched a specific project specifically aimed at investigating a cultural phase that had not been previously explored, namely the transition phase between Late Bronze/Early Iron age (1200–800 BCE) and Early-Historic phases (c. BCE 500–80 AD) in the ancient Gandhara region. Current excavations of the key-site of Barikot (Bir-kot-ghwandai), supported by a substantial series of new radiocarbon dates, provide a new, very detailed chronological-cultural framework for the social evolution of ancient Swat after the late Bronze age. Thanks to the radiocarbon data published in this work, for the first time at Barikot it has been possible to discover or better define the Achaemenian, Graeco- Bactrian and Indo-Greek acculturational phases. Barikot is identified with the city of Bazira/Beira mentioned by Alexander’s historians’ and the siege of Alexander the Great, in 327 BCE, falling exactly in one of the identified archaeological frames.

Bronze Age Salūt (ST1) and the Indus Civilization: Recent discoveries and new insights on regional interaction

2016

distribution and features of the Indus Civilization
J. Görsdorf & U. Franke-Vogt: Implications of Radiocarbon Dates from Sohr Damb/Nal, Balochistan

RADIOCARBON, Vol 49, Nr 2, 2007

Sohr Damb/Nal, the type site of the Nal complex, is located in Balochistan, Pakistan. After 1 season of excavation by H Hargreaves in 1924, which made the polychrome Nal pottery widely known, no further work took place until the Joint German-Pakistani Archaeological Mission to Kalat resumed excavations in 2001. So far, 4 seasons of excavations have been undertaken, which have revealed 4 periods of occupation, dated from about 3800 to 2000 BC. The well-stratified assemblages provide new insights into cultural processes and developments, and enhance the comparative frameworks through typological series and a comprehensive set of radiocarbon dates. This information is essential for assessing cross-cultural relations and the date of urbanization. In this paper, the 14C dates from Sohr Damb/Nal are presented and their cultural context is discussed. Period III has several links to sites in Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Iran, such as Miri Qalat IIIb–c, Mehrgarh VI–VII/ Nausharo I, Quetta III, Mundigak IV, and Shahr-e Sokhta II–III. Period IV represents a Kulli-Harappan occupation, which is dated to the second half of the 3rd millennium BC.

1990. The Decline of the Indus Civilization and the Late Harappan Period in the Indus Valley, Lahore Museum Bulletin (Lahore), Vol. III (2): 1-17.
Cultural Relationships beyond the Iranian Plateau: The Helmand Civilization, Baluchistan and the Indus Valley in the 3rd Millennium BCE

Paléorient, 2008

ABSTRACT

1991. The Cultural Patterns of Ancient Pakistan and Neighbouring Regions, circa 7000-1500 BC, Pakistan Archaeology (Karachi), No.26: 218-237.
A new approach to tracking connections between the Indus Valley and Mesopotamia: initial results of strontium isotope analyses from Harappa and Ur

Exchange and interaction between early state-level societies in Mesopotamia and the Indus Valley during the 3rd millennium BC has been documented for some time. The study of this interaction has been dominated by the analysis of artifacts such as carnelian beads and marine shell, along with limited textual evidence. With the aid of strontium, carbon, and oxygen isotopes, it is now possible to develop more direct means for determining the presence of non-local people in both regions. This preliminary study of tooth enamel from individuals buried at Harappa and at the Royal Cemetery of Ur, indicates that it should be feasible to identify Harappans in Mesopotamia. It is also possible to examine the mobility of individuals from communities within the greater Indus Valley region.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (80)

  1. Didier et Mutin, in press; Mutin, in press.
  2. Besenval, 2000: 169-171, fi g. 11-20.
  3. Mutin, 2007; Mutin, in press; Didier et Mutin, in press.
  4. Sajjadi, 2003: 61, fi g. 26.
  5. Bonora et al., 2000: 505, fi g. 7.
  6. Mutin, 2007 (vol. 4) : fi g. II.150, n° 4 and II.167; Mutin, in press; Stein, 1931: pl. XV-XVI.
  7. BIBLIOGRAPHY AL-TIKRITI W.Y. 1981 Reconsideration of the Late Fourth and Third Millennium BC in the Arabian Gulf, with Special Reference to the United Arab Emirates. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Cambridge, Trinity Col- lege, University of Cambridge.
  8. ALLCHIN B. and ALLCHIN R. 1982 The Rise of Civilization in India and Pakistan. Cambridge: Cam- bridge University Press (Cambridge World Archaeology 19).
  9. AMIET P. and TOSI M. 1978 Phase 10 at Shahr-i Sokhta: Excavations in Square XDV and the Late 4th Millennium B.C. Assemblage of Sistān. East and West 28: 9-31.
  10. BARTHÉLEMY DE SAIZIEU B. 2003 Les Parures de Mehrgarh: Perles et Pendentifs du Néolithique précéramique à la Période pré-Indus. Fouilles 1974-1985. Paris : Éditions ERC.
  11. BARTHÉLEMY DE SAIZIEU B. and BOUQUILLON A. 1997 Evolution of glazed Materials from the Chalcolithic to the Indus Period based on the data of Mehrgarh and Nausharo. In: ALLCHIN R. and ALLCHIN B. (eds.), South Asian Archaeology 1995: 63-76. New Delhi: Oxford & IBH Publishing Co.
  12. BESENVAL R. 1994 The 1992-1993 field-seasons at Miri Qalat: New contributions to the chronology of Protohistoric settlement in Pakistani Makran. In: PARPOLA A. and KOSKIKALLIO P. (eds.), South Asian Archaeology 1993 (vol. I): 81-91. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia. 1997a Entre le sud-est iranien et la plaine de l'Indus : le Kech Makran. Recherches archéologiques sur le peuplement ancien d'une marche des confins indo-iraniens. Arts Asiatiques 52 : 5-36. 1997b The Chronology of Ancient Occupation in Makran: Result of the 1994 Season at Miri Qalat, Pakistan, Makran. In: ALLCHIN R. and ALLCHIN B. (eds.), South Asian Archaeology 1995: 199- 216. New Delhi: Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. 2000 New Data for the Chronology of the Protohistory of Kech- Makran (Pakistan) from Miri Qalat 1996 and Shahi-Tump 1997
  13. Field-Seasons. In: TADDEI M. and DE MARCO G. (eds.), South Asian Archaeology 1997: 161-188. Rome: IsIAO (Serie Orien- tale Roma 90). 2005 Chronology of Protohistoric Kech-Makran. In: JARRIGE C. and LEFÈVRE V. (eds.), South Asian Archaeology 2001: 17-24. Paris: Éditions ERC.
  14. BESENVAL R. et DIDIER A. 2004 Peuplement protohistorique du Kech-Makran au 3ème millé- naire av. J.-C. : l'assemblage céramique de la période IIIC sur le site de Miri Qalat. Paléorient 30,2 : 159-178.
  15. BIBBY T.G. 1966 The Eleventh Campaign of the Danish Archaeological Expedi- tion, 1965. Kuml 1965: 75-95.
  16. J.-F. JARRIGE, A. DIDIER and G. QUIVRON
  17. Paléorient, vol. 37.2, p. 7-34 © CNRS ÉDITIONS 2011 BISCIONE R. 1974 Relative Chronology and Pottery Connections between Shahr-i Sokhta and Mundigak, eastern Iran. Memorie dell'Istituto Ita- liano di Paleontologia Umana II: 131-145.
  18. 1979 The Burnt Building of Period Shahr-I Sokhta IV. An Attempt of Functional Analysis from the Distribution of Pottery Types. In: GNOLI G. and ROSSI A.V. (eds.), Iranica: 291-306. Naples: Istituto Universitario Orientale. 1990 The Elusive Phase 2 of the Shahr-i Sokhta Sequence. In: TADDEI M. and DE MARCO G. (eds.), South Asian Archaeology 1987: 391-410. Rome: IsIAO (Serie Orientale Roma 66).
  19. BONORA G.L., DOMANIN C., SALVATORI S. and SOLDINI A. 2000 The Oldest Graves of Shahr-i Sokhta Graveyard. In: TADDEI M. and DE MARCO (eds.), South Asian Archaeology 1997: 495-513. Rome: IsIAO (Serie orientale Roma 90).
  20. CALDWELL J.R. 1967 Investigations at Tal-i Iblis. Springfield: The Illinois State Museum Society (Illinois State Museum Preliminary Report 9).
  21. CASAL J.-M. 1961 Fouilles de Mundigak. Paris : Librairie C. Klincksieck (Mémoires de la Délégation archéologique française en Afgha- nistan XVII).
  22. 1964 Fouilles d'Amri. Paris : Publication de la Commission des Fouilles archéologiques.
  23. CORTESI E., TOSI M., LAZZARI A. and VIDALE M. 2008 Cultural Relationships beyond the Iranian Plateau: The Hel- mand Civilization, Baluchistan and the Indus Valley in the 3 rd Millennium BCE. Paléorient 34,2: 5-35.
  24. DALES G.F. 1972 Prehistoric Research in Southern Afghanistan. Afghanistan XXIV: 14-40.
  25. 1977 New Excavations at Nad-i Ali (Sorkh Dagh), Afghanistan. Uni- versity of California Berkeley: Center for South and Southeast Asia (Research Monograph Series 16).
  26. 1991 Some Specialized Ceramic Studies at Harappa 2. In: MEADOW R.H. (ed.), Harappa Excavations 1986-1990. A Multidiscipli- nary Approach to Third Millennium Urbanism: 61-69. Madison, Wisc.: Prehistory Press (Monographs in World Archaeology 3).
  27. DE CARDI B. 1965 Excavation and Reconnaissance in Kalat, West Pakistan -The Prehistoric Sequence in the Surab Region. Pakistan Archaeo- logy 2: 86-182. Karachi: The Department of Archaeology, Ministry of Education, Government of Pakistan. 1970 Excavations at Bampur, a Third Millennium Settlement in Per- sian Baluchistan, 1966. New York: American Museum of Natu- ral History (Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History 51, 3).
  28. DIDIER A. 2007 Archéologie des confins indo-iraniens : Étude de la production céramique du Kech-Makran (Pakistan) dans la première moitié du IIIe millénaire av. J.-C. Thèse de doctorat non publiée. Paris, Université de Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne. In press L'utilisation de la couleur dans les céramiques protohistoriques du Balochistan pakistanais et à Mundigak (Afghanistan). Iden- tités culturelles et traditions techniques. The Use of colour in the Protohistoric Pottery from Pakistani Balochistan and from Mundigak (Afghanistan). Cultural Identities and Technical Tra- ditions. Annales de la fondation Fyssen 26.
  29. DIDIER A. et MUTIN B. In press La production céramique protohistorique du Makran pakista- nais dans la compréhension des relations indo-iraniennes. In: BENDEZU-SARMIENTO J. (éd.), Archéologie française en Asie centrale post-soviétique. Un enjeu sociopolitique et culturel. Paris : De Boccard, Cahiers d'Asie centrale 21.
  30. DUPREE L. 1988 Deh Morasi Ghundai: A Chalcolithic Site in South-Central Afghanistan. New York (Anthropological Papers of the Ameri- can Museum of Natural History 50,2).
  31. DURRANI F.A. 1988 Excavations in the Gomal Valley: Rehman Dheri Excavation Report No. I. Ancient Pakistan 6: 1-204.
  32. FAIRSERVIS W.A. Jr. 1956 Excavations in the Quetta Valley, West Pakistan. New York: American Museum of Natural History (Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History 45,2). 1959 Archaeological Surveys in the Zhob and Loralai Districts, West Pakistan. New York (Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History 47,2). 1961 Archaeological Studies in the Seistan Basin of South-Western Afghanistan and Eastern Iran. New York: American Museum of Natural History (Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History 48,1).
  33. 1967 The Origin, Character, and Decline of an Early Civilization. Novitates 2302: 1-48.
  34. FIELD H. and MARTIN R.A. 1935 Painted Pottery from Jemdet Nasr, Iraq. American Journal of Archaeology 39,3: 310-320.
  35. FRANKE U. 2008 Baluchistan and the Borderlands. In: PEARSALL D. (ed.), Ency- clopedia of Archaeology 2008 (vol. 1): 651-670. New York: Elsevier.
  36. FRANKE-VOGT U. 2005 Excavations at Sohr Damb/Nal: Results of the 2002 and 2004 Seasons. In: FRANKE-VOGT U. and WEISSHAAR H.-J. (eds.), South Asian Archaeology 2003: 63-76. Aachen: Linden Soft. FRANKE-VOGT U. and IBRAHIM A. 2005 A New Perspective of an Old Site: Reopening Excavations at Sohr Damb/Nal (Balochistan). In: JARRIGE C. and LEFÈVRE V. (eds.), South Asian Archaeology 2001: 105-115. Paris: Éditions ERC. HARGREAVES H. 1929 Excavations in Baluchistan 1925. Sampur Mound, Mastung and Sohr Damb, Nal. New Delhi: Government of India (Memoirs of the Archaeological Survey of India 35).
  37. ISAKOV A. et LYONNET B. 1988 Céramiques de Sarazm (Tadjikistan, URSS) : Problèmes d'échanges et de peuplement à la fin du Chalcolithique et au début de l'âge du Bronze. Paléorient 14,1 : 31-47.
  38. JARRIGE C. 1988 Les figurines humaines au Baluchistan. In: AMIET P. (éd.), Les Cités oubliées de l'Indus : 65-70. Paris: Association Française d'Action Artistique. 1997 The figurines from Nausharo, Period I and their further deve- lopments. In: ALLCHIN R. and ALLCHIN B. (eds.), South Asian Paléorient, vol. 37.2, p. 7-34 © CNRS ÉDITIONS 2011 Archaeology 1995: 33-43. New Delhi: Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. 2008 The Figurines of the First Farmers at Mehrgarh and their Offs- hoots. Pragdhara 18: 155-166.
  39. JARRIGE C., JARRIGE J.-F., MEADOW R.H. and QUIVRON G. (eds.) 1995 Mehrgarh Field Reports 1974-1985. From Neolithic Times to the Indus Civilization. Karachi: The Department of Culture and Tourism, Government of Sindh.
  40. JARRIGE J.-F. 1987 Une jarre polychrome à tenon perforé de Mundigak. In: GNOLI G. and LANCIOTTI L. (eds.), Orientalia Iosephi Tucci Memoriae Dicata: 661-666. Rome: IsMEO (Serie orientale 56,2). 1988 Excavations at Nausharo, 1986-1987. Pakistan Archaeology 23: 149-203.
  41. 1989 Excavation at Nausharo, 1987-1988. Pakistan Archaeology 24: 21-67. 1990 Excavation at Nausharo, 1988-1989. Pakistan Archaeology 25: 193-240.
  42. 1993 The Question of the Beginnings of the Harappan Civilisa- tion as seen from the Nausharo Excavations. In: GAIL A. and MEVISSEN G. (eds.), South Asian Archaeology 1991: 149-164. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag. 1994 The final phase of the Indus occupation at Nausharo and its connection with the following cultural complex of Mehr- garh VIII. In: PARPOLA A. and KOSKIKALLIO P. (eds.), South Asian Archaeology 1993: 294-314. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tie- deakatemia.
  43. 1995 Du Néolithique à la Civilisation de l'Inde ancienne: Contribu- tion des recherches archéologiques dans le Nord-Ouest du sous- continent pakistanais. Arts Asiatiques 50 : 5-23. 'Indus. Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres, Comptes rendus des Séances de l'année 1996, III : 821-877.
  44. 1998 The beginning of pottery in Balochistan. In: PHILLIPS C.S., POTTS D.T. and SEARIGHT S. (eds.), Arabia and its Neigh- bours, Essays on Prehistorical and Historical Developments presented in honour of Beatrice de Cardi: 327-338. Turnhout: Brepols. 2008 L'origine des cités de l'Indus à la lumière des fouilles de Mehr- garh et de Nausharo au Pakistan. In : GUILAINE J. (éd.), Villes, villages, campagnes de l'Âge du Bronze : 9-22. Paris : Errance.
  45. JARRIGE J.-F. and MEADOW R.H. 1992 Mélanges Fairservis: A Discourse on Relations between Kachi and Sindh in Prehistory. In: POSSEHL G.L. (ed.), South Asian Archaeology Studies: 163-178. New Delhi: Oxford & I.B.H. Publishing Co.
  46. JARRIGE J.-F. and QUIVRON G. 2008 The Indus Valley and the Indo-Iranian Borderlands at the end of the 3rd Millennium and the beginning of the 2nd Millennium B.C. In: RAVEN E.M. (ed.), South Asian Archaeology 1999: 60-70. Groningen: Egbert Forsten.
  47. JARRIGE J.-F. and USMAN-HASSAN M. 1989 Funerary Complexes in Baluchistan at the End of the Third Millennium in the Light of Recent Discoveries at Mehrgarh and Quetta. In: FRIFELT K. and SORENSEN P. (eds.), South Asian Archaeology 1985: 150-166. London: Curzon Press.
  48. JARRIGE J.-F., QUIVRON G., JARRIGE C., with the collaboration of HAQUET J.-F., DIDIER A. and MEADOW R.H. 2011 Nindowari (Pakistan). La culture de Kulli. Ses origines et ses relations avec la civilisation de l'Indus. Nindowari (Pakistan). The Kulli Culture. Its origins and its relations with the Indus Civilization. Paris: Gingko éditeur.
  49. KENOYER J.M. and MEADOW R.H. 1997 Excavations at Harappa 1994-1995: New Perspectives on the Indus Script, Craft Activities, and City Organization. In: ALLCHIN R. and ALLCHIN B. (eds.), South Asian Archaeology 1995: 139-172. New Delhi: Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. 2005 Excavations at Harappa 2000-2001: New Insights on Chrono- logy and City Organization. In: JARRIGE C. and LEFÈVRE V. (eds.), South Asian Archaeology 2001: 207-225. Paris: Éditions ERC. 2008 Harappa Excavations 1998-1999. New Evidence for the Deve- lopment and Manifestation of the Harappan Phenomenon. In: RAVEN E.M. (ed.), South Asian Archaeology 1999: 85-110. Groningen: Egbert Forsten.
  50. KHAN F.A. 1965 Excavations at Kot Diji. Pakistan Archaeology 2: 11-85.
  51. KHLOPIN I.N. 1964 Geoksjurskaja gruppa poselenii epoki eneolita [Geoksiur group of sites from the Neolithic period]. Moscow and Leningrad: Nauka.
  52. KNOX R. 1994 A New Indus Valley Cylinder Seal. In: PARPOLA A. and KOS- KIKALLIO P. (eds.), South Asian Archaeology 1993 (vol.I): 375- 378. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.
  53. LAMBERG-KARLOVSKY C.C. and TOSI M. 1973 Shahr-i Sokhta and Tepe Yahya, Tracks on the Earliest History of the Iranian Plateau. East and West 23, 1-2: 21-58.
  54. LYONNET B. 1996 Sarazm (Tadjikistan) céramiques (Chalcolithique et Bronze ancien). Paris : De Boccard (Mémoires de la Délégation archéo- logique française en Asie centrale VII).
  55. MACKAY E.J.H. 1937 Further Excavations at Mohenjo-Daro. New Delhi: Govern- ment Press.
  56. MADJIDZADEH Y. 2003 Jiroft, the Earliest Oriental Civilization. Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance: Iran Cultural Heritage Organi- zation Research Center.
  57. MASSON V.M. and MERPERT N. YA 1982 Eneolit Srednei Azii [Eneolithic of Central Asia]. In: MASSON V.M. and MERPERT N. (eds.), Eneolit SSSR: 9-92. Moscow: Nauka.
  58. MATTHEWS R.J. 1992 Defining the Style of the Period: Jemdet Nasr 1926-28. Iraq 54: 1-34.
  59. MILLE B., BOURGARIT D. and BESENVAL R. 2005 Metallurgical Study of the "Leopards Weight" from Shahi- Tump (Pakistan). In: JARRIGE C. and LEFÈVRE V. (eds.), South Asian Archaeology 2001: 237-244. Paris: Éditions ERC. J.-F. JARRIGE, A. DIDIER and G. QUIVRON
  60. Paléorient, vol. 37.2, p. 7-34 © CNRS ÉDITIONS 2011 MUGAVERO L. and VIDALE M. 2003 The Use of Polychrome Containers in the Hilmand Civilization: A Female Function? East and West 53: 67-94.
  61. MUTIN B. 2007 Contribution à l'étude du peuplement des confins indo-iraniens au Chalcolithique : Caractérisation de la production céra- mique des périodes II et IIIa du Makran pakistanais (IVe mil- lénaire av. J.-C.). Thèse de doctorat non publiée, Université de Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne. In press Ceramic Traditions and Interactions on the Southeastern Ira- nian Plateau during the 4 th Millennium BC. In: PETRIE C. (ed.), Ancient Iran and its Neighbours. Local developments and long- range interactions in the 4 th millennium BC. Oxford: Oxbow and British Institute of Persian Studies.
  62. PIPERNO M. and SALVATORI S. 1983 Recent Results and New Perspectives from the Research at the Graveyard of Shahr-i Sokhta, Sistan, Iran. Annali dell'Istituto Universitario Orientale 43,2: 173-191.
  63. 2007 The Shahr-i Sokhta Graveyard (Sistan, Iran). Excavation Cam- paigns 1972-1978. Rome: IsIAO (Reports and Memoirs N.S. VI). PRACCHIA S. 1985 Excavations of a Bronze-Age Ceramic Manufacturing Area at Lal Shah, Mehrgarh. East and West 35,4: 458-468.
  64. QUIVRON G. 2000 The Evolution on the Mature Indus Pottery Style in the Light of the Excavations at Nausharo, Pakistan. East and West 50, 1-4: 147-190.
  65. 2008 New light on the Kulli culture. In: RAVEN E.M. (ed.), South Asian Archaeology 1999: 47-59. Groningen: Egbert Forsten.
  66. RAO S.R. 1973 Lothal and the Indus Civilization. New York: Asia Publishing.
  67. SAJJADI S.M.S. 2003 Excavations at Shahr-i Sokhta. Preliminary report on the Exca- vations of the Graveyard, 1997-2000. Iran XLI: 21-97.
  68. 2005 Bampur Tepe. The First Season of Excavation at Bampur Tepe. Tehran: ICAR/ICHTO (Archaeological Report Monograph Series). 2007 Excavations at Shahr-e Sukhteh. Graveyard 1997-2000. Preli- minary report 1 (in Persian). Tehran: Cultural and Communica- tion Vice Directorate, Office of Cultural Affairs. 2009 Excavations at Shahr-e Sukhteh. Second Preliminary report on the graveyard (2001-2003). Tehran: Iranian Center for Archaeological Research, Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism Organization of Sistan and Baluchistan (in Persian).
  69. SALVATORI S. and TOSI M. 2005 Shahr-i Sokhta Revised Sequence. In: JARRIGE C. and LEFÈVRE V. (eds.), South Asian Archaeology 2001: 281-292. Paris: Éditions ERC.
  70. SALVATORI S. and VIDALE M. 1997 Shahr-i Sokhta 1975-1978: Central Quarters Excavations, Pre- liminary Report. Rome: IsIAO (Reports and Memoirs 1).
  71. SARRAF M.R. 1981 Die Keramik von Tell-i Iblis und Ihre zeitliche und raümliche Beziehungen zu den anderen iranischen und mesopotamischen Kulturen. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer Verlag (AMI, Ergänzungs- band VII).
  72. STEIN A. (Sir.)
  73. 1931 An Archaeological Tour in Gedrosia. Calcutta: CPB (Memoirs of the Archaeological Survey of India 37).
  74. TOSI M. 1976 The Dating of the Umm an-Nar Culture and a Proposed Sequence for Oman in the Third Millennium BC. The Journal of Oman Studies 2: 81-92.
  75. 1983 Prehistoric Sistan I. Rome: IsMEO (IsMEO Reports and Memoirs XIX, 1).
  76. VOGT B., CLEUZIOU S. et MÉRY S. 2011 Les premières tombes à chambres multiples : la tombe M de Hili. In: CLEUZIOU S., MÉRY S. et VOGT B. (éd.), Protohistoire de l'oasis d'al-Aïn, Travaux de la mission archéologique fran- çaise à Abou Dhabi (Émirats arabes unis). Les sépultures de l'âge du Bronze : 41-71. Oxford (BAR Int. Ser. 2227).
  77. WHEELER M. (Sir.)
  78. 1950 Five thousand years of Pakistan, an archaeological outline. Karachi: Royal Book Co.
  79. WONG E., PETRIE C. and FAZELI H. 2010 Cheshme-Ali Ware. A Petrographic and Geochemical Study of a Transitional Chalcolithic Period Industry on the Northern Central Plateau of Iran. Iran XLVIII: 11-26.
  80. WRIGHT R.P. 1984 Technology, Style and Craft Specialization: Spheres of Inte- raction and Exchange in The Indo-Iranian Borderlands, Third Millennium B.C. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University. 1995 Fine ware traditions at Mehrgarh. In: JARRIGE C., JAR- RIGE J.-F., MEADOW R.H. and QUIVRON G. (eds.), Mehrgarh Field Reports 1974-1985. From Neolithic Times to the Indus Civilization: 662-671. Karachi: The Department of Culture and Tourism, Government of Sindh. 2010 The Ancient Indus: Urbanism, Economy, and Society. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Related papers

Luciani, M. 2015 Review of Didier A. 2013. La production céramique du Makran (Pakistan) à l’âge du Bronze ancien. Contribution à l’étude des peuplements des régions indo-iraniennes. Paris : De Boccard (Mémoires des missions archéologiques françaises en Asie centrale et en Asie moyenne XIV)

Paléorient, 2015

Archaeological Survey on the East and Southeast Areas of Shahr-i Sokhta: Some Evidence for Making Chronology during the Third and Early Second Millennium BC

Excavation and Researches at Shahr i Sokhta 3, E. Ascalone and S.M.S Sajjadi(eds), Pishin Pajouh, Tehran, Iran. pp. 233-266, 2022

The cultural basin around Shahr-i Sokhta stretches from the Ramshar area north of the site to the Tasuki region known as the Rud-i Biaban area in the south, forming a strip of land approximately 45 km long. The present article is the result of a nonprobabilistic survey carried out in April 2019 which covers the east and southeast of Shahr-i Sokhta from Ramshar to Rud-i Biaban. During the surface survey, a total of 32 sites were visited and surface finds including pottery sherds and stone objects such as alabaster vessel fragments and micro blades were collected EXCAVATIONS AND RESEARCHES AT SHAHR-I SOKHTA 3 234 and registered. The surveyed sites of the area have various chronologies, from 3000 BC to 2000 BC and later. To better understand the distribution of these sites, a general classification based on the comparative dating of the collected pottery was performed, assigning the sites to three main periods: a) the early third millennium BC; b) Periods III-II of Shahr-i Sokhta and c) Period IV of Shahr-i Sokhta and the Rud-i Biaban phase.

A Note on the Interregional Interactions between the Indus Civilization and the Arabian Peninsula during the Third Millennium BCE

Decades in Deserts: Essays on Near Eastern Archaeology in honour of Sumio Fujii, 2019

Paolo Biagi, Elisabetta Starnini - The Upper Palaeolithic in the Greater Indus Valley (Pakistan): Problems and perspectives

PREHİSTORYA’NIN “ABİ”Sİ HARUN TAŞKIRAN’A ARMAĞAN KİTABI / STUDIES IN HONOUR OF HARUN TAŞKIRAN, 2023

Archaeological surveys carried out in Sindh in the 1970s were resumed during the last decade and are still underway. They have shown that Upper Palaeolithic assemblages occur in few territories of the Greater Indus Valley, Lower Sindh in particular. Among them are the northern coast of the Arabian Sea and the banks of the seasonal watercourses that flow into the Indian Ocean from the desert regions of the interior. The chronology of the Upper Palaeolithic complexes is difficult to define because the sites consist of surface knapped chert artefacts, in association with which organic material suitable for dating has never been retrieved. The prehistoric lithic assemblages recovered from the southernmost territories of Lower Sindh consist of typical instruments, among which are thick, curved, unilateral abrupt-retouched points obtained from core rejuvenation bladelike flakes. The blanks have been detached from corticated bipolar cores obtained from small chert pebbles. Upper Palaeolithic workshops for the production of bladelet blanks are very common in the Rohri, Ongar and Daphro Hills near Sukkur and Kotri respectively.

Research on the Indus Civilization c.2010-c.
U-Pb zircon dating evidence for a Pleistocene Sarasvati River and capture of the Yamuna River

Geology, 2012

Neogi, French, Durcan, Singh and Petrie 2019, Geoarchaeological insights into the location of Indus settlements on the plains of northwest India, Quaternary Research

Quaternary Research, 2019

This article presents a geomorphological and micromorphological study of the locational context of four Indus civilisation archaeological sites-Alamgirpur, Masudpur I and VII, and Burj-all situated on the Sutlej-Yamuna interfluve in northwest India. The analysis indicates a strong correlation between settlement foundation and particular landscape positions on an extensive alluvial floodplain. Each of the analysed sites was located on sandy levees and/or riverbank deposits associated with former channels. These landscape positions would have situated settlements above the level of seasonal floodwater resulting from the Indian summer monsoon. In addition, the sandy soils on the margins of these elevated landscape positions would have been seasonally replenished with water, silt, clay, and fine organic matter, considerably enhancing their capacity for water retention and fertility and making them particularly suitable for agriculture. These former landscapes are obscured by recent modification and extensive agricultural practices. These geoarchaeological evaluations indicate that there is a hidden landscape context for each Indus settlement. This specific type of interaction between humans and their local context is an important aspect of Indus cultural adaptations to diverse, variable, and changing environments.

Mahtoutabad I (Konar Sandal South, Jiroft): preliminary evidence of occupation of a Halil Rud site in the early fourth millennium BC

Ancient Iran and Its neighbours : local developments and long-range interactions in the 4th millennium BC, 2013

Rescue excavations carried out from 2006 to 2009 at the site of the plundered graveyard of Mahtoutabad (near Konar Sandal South), revealed the remains of three successive settlements dating to the fourth millennium BC. The earliest phase of occupation, Mahtoutabad I, lies above the virgin soil, at a depth of about 3.5–4 m below the present surface and was radiocarbon dated to the late fifth–early fourth millennium BC. The second phase, Mahtoutabad II, above the remains of the first settlement, is represented by a thick series of sediments that are attributed, on archaeological considerations, to the last centuries of the first half of the fourth millennium BC. The occupation labelled Mahtoutabad III, limited to secondary deposits in a restricted area of the site, is distinguished by ceramics that are linked, on stylistic-morphological grounds, to the Middle and Late Uruk-related pottery assemblages of the central-eastern Iranian Plateau. Mahtoutabad IV, finally, is the large cemetery of the third millennium BC. This paper briefly describes the stratigraphy of the site, identifying some crucial information on the third-millennium graveyard. It then focuses on the archaeological record of the earliest phase, Mahtoutabad I, and discusses its cultural links with contemporary ceramic assemblages in the same general geographic area.

Landscapes, soils, and mound histories of the Upper Indus Valley, Pakistan: new insights on the Holocene environments near ancient Harappa

Journal of Archaeological Science, 2004

The site of Harappa in central Pakistan has been the primary source of information on Indus Valley cultural and natural landscapes in the Upper Indus Basin. While the site has been excavated for over 100 years, little was known of the pre-occupation history and environments responsible for the culture's emergence in the third millennium BC. Recent geoarcheological investigations of sites sharing the same landform as Harappa-the Bari Doab-along the ancient Beas River have synthesized sediment, soil, and cultural stratigraphies that place Harappa in the context of a regional landscape history. Two key sites-Lahoma Lal Tibba and Chak Purbane Syal-illustrate that larger floodplains of the Indus system stabilized sometime in the early Holocene, when soil development exceeded rates of alluviation. The site of Harappa was revisited to procure radiocarbon dates beneath initial occupation horizons. The stratigraphy and dates established the Pleistocene/Holocene interface and confirmed coeval trends of diminished Early Holocene floodplain accretion and sustained soil formation. Pedogenesis continued at least to the beginning of the fifth millennium BP when occupation began to intensify along the Beas and elsewhere in the Upper Indus. Site formation sequences at Lahoma Lal Tibba and Chak Purbane Syal mirror those of Harappa proper, albeit on a smaller scale.

Academia
Academia
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved
[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2025 Movatter.jp