Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.

Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Late Mississippian/Protohistoric Ceramic Chronology and Cultural Change in the Lower Tallapoosa and Alabama River Valleys

Profile image of Ned  JenkinsNed Jenkins
visibility

description

53 pages

Sign up for access to the world's latest research

checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact

Abstract
sparkles

AI

This research investigates the late Mississippian and protohistoric ceramic chronology and cultural changes in the Lower Tallapoosa and Alabama River Valleys. The study highlights the distinct ceramic traditions present in central Alabama during this period, particularly focusing on the Moundville variant and its influence on local cultural groups. It outlines a transition from earlier Woodland pottery to complex Mississippian ceramic styles and discusses the interaction between various cultural complexes, indicating a significant reorganization of settlement patterns and social structures in response to ecological and political changes.

Key takeaways
sparkles

AI

  1. The central Alabama region shows diverse pre-Mississippian and Mississippian ceramic traditions over 1,000 years.
  2. Late Moundville III populations migrated to the upper Alabama River around A.D. 1400-1450, forming the Big Eddy phase.
  3. The Tascaluca paramount chiefdom developed around A.D. 1540, linking several provinces in central Alabama.
  4. Ceramic types evolved from the Big Eddy and Shine II complexes into the Atasi complex post-De Soto.
  5. The Alabama River phase exhibits a decline in sociopolitical complexity, marked by compact villages and burial urns.

Related papers

Prehistoric Settlement in the Central and Lower Mississippi Valley: A Critical Review.
A Tinsley Hill Phase Mississippian Occupation at the Confluence of the Tennessee and Ohio Rivers

2014

This article summarizes the results of excavations at Chestnut Lake, a late Mississippian Tinsley Hill phase (cal A.D. 1300– 1450) household located in the lower Ohio River valley. The small portion of the site investigated resulted in the documentation of a rebuilt wall trench structure which appears to have been burned. Analyses of the recovered materials and their spatial relationships allowed the identification of hearth related activity areas inside the structure. No features were identified outside the building, indicating that all related activities were likely conducted inside. The presence of cannel coal celts, galena, non-local cherts, and ceramic ear plugs suggest a higher status family occupied the residence. The relationship of Chestnut Lake to other Tinsley Hill phase occupations in the region is considered.

The Early Mississippian Frontier in the Lower Chattahoocheeapalachicola River Valley

Southeastern Archaeology, 2002

Explanations of Mississippian origins are sometimes presented as a choice between in situ cultural developments versus population movement. We examine these contrasting perspectives in the context of interaction among three regional populations with disparate material culture traditions and differing degrees of organizational complexity. We argue that population movement was the mechanism that established the initial Mississippian communities in the lower Chattahoochee-Apalachicola region, and subsequent cultural developments among neighboring indigenous populations were influenced by the presence of immigrant settlers. We propose that the different ways in which regional populations responded to interaction across a geographical, cultural, and sociopolitical frontier placed them on divergent paths to Mississippianization. logists thought population movement a capricious historical event rather than a cultural process structured by recurrent principles. Lathrap argued against this perspective, however, and maintained that understanding population movement as a process is as fundamental to cultural evolution as understanding the processes of radiation and drift is to biological evolution. Yet the ecodemographic functionalism of processual archaeology, as practiced over the decades since Lathrap's essay, merely reinforced the barrier between culture history and cultural process. In this article, we examine how these issues have shaped archaeological debates about Mississippian origins in the lower Chattahoochee-Apalachicola River region (Figure 1). The lower Chattahoochee River extends from the Fall Line to the Flint River confluence, south which the river is known as the Apalachicola. In this region, in situ or local cultural development versus One problem currently challenging North American archaeologists is to understand the emergence and spread of the Mississippian cultural phenomenon: the adoption of intensive maize agriculture, hierarchical decisionmaking institutions, and ascriptive ranking. Although regionally diverse in population size and material culture content, Mississippian societies shared many technological, economic, and organizational patterns, and specific ceramic vessel styles, architectural forms, and iconographie imagery had wide geographical distributions. These pan-regional commonalities cannot be explained by reference to local adaptive conditions considered in isolation. Instead, complex historical connections between populations are implicated. In the 1950s, the iconoclastic archaeologist Donald Lathrap, among others, proposed that radiation, drift, and other concepts from biological evolution had useful cultural analogs. Lathrap outlined a process by which populations with successful economic patterns behaved like radiating species in biology (cf. Sahlins and Service 1960). As competing populations with different economic patterns expand their range, "this competition forms the major part of the environment to which a society must adapt" (Lathrap 1976:528). Lathrap posited

Recent Research at the Ames Mound Complex an Early Mississippian site in Southwest Tennessee
Deciphering DeArmond Mound (40RE12): The Ceramic Analysis of an East Tennessee Mississippian Center

Department of Anthropology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville., 2005

""The DeArmond mound (40RE12) was initially excavated by WPA investigator John Alden and crew between February 1940 and March 1941 before being inundated by the Watts Bar dam in January of 1942. The site included a pyramidal earthen mound with an adjacent village. The mound was excavated in stratigraphic levels, with cultural material separated by building stages. The ceramic collection from this excavation is used in a study of Mississippian temporal and spatial variation within the eastern Tennessee Valley.The collection is comprised of 22,826 pottery sherds and an additional 22 partial, reconstructed, or whole vessels. Morphological and stylistic analyses of these sherds are combined with mound substructure architecture, and grave associations to delimit the cultural sequence of the mound. Morphological attributes were used in an intra-regional comparison of coeval Mississippian sites from the Chickamauga Basin to elucidate possible spatial variations in ceramic morphology. Early Mississippian Hiwassee Island Phase traits characterize the lower mound levels (H through E), while Dallas Phase cultural traits are found in the upper levels (C through A). Based on these characteristics, the DeArmond mound is a multi-component Mississippian site. Intra-regional comparisons with the Hiwassee Island (40MG31), Hixon (40HA3), and Dallas (40HA1) sites in the Chickamauga Basin display similarities between the ceramic assemblages. Differences between the Chickamauga Basin sites and DeArmond are found in ceramic surface decoration, mound architecture, and grave associations.""

Daniel A. LaDu (2009), An Exploration of the Age of Mound Construction at Mazique (22Ad502), a Late Prehistoric Mound Center in Adams County, Mississippi

The Mazique site (22Ad502), in Adams County, Mississippi, is believed to have been occupied during both the Coles Creek (A.D. 700-1000) and Mississippi periods (A.D. 1000-1680). However, Ian W. Brown (2007) has suggested that mound building at Mazique was primarily a result of Plaquemine activity. This thesis presents new evidence suggesting that mound construction at Mazique occurred primarily during the Coles Creek period and that the Plaquemine presence here during the Mississippi period has been overestimated. The larger implications of these conclusions are that the construction, arrangement, and use of flat top mounds and plaza complexes was an indigenous development of the Coles Creek period in the Natchez bluffs region as it was in the greater Lower Mississippi Valley, and that the characterization of the Plaquemine culture as a hybridization of Coles Creek and Mississippian cultures should not be discarded as a theory of cultural interaction in the region.

Mississippian Settlement Patterns in Southwestern Indiana. In Mississippian Settlement Patterns, Bruce D. Smith, editor

Mississippian Settlement Patterns, 1978

Publisher Summary This chapter discusses the Mississippian settlement patterns in southwestern Indiana. Willey's Viru Valley study and Winters' Wabash Valley study have demonstrated the value of settlement pattern data for facilitating inferences about the character of prehistoric society and culture that are not readily observable in archaeological record. Archaeological research spanning 80 years can be brought together to describe the areal settlement patterns of two Mississippian phases in the Ohio River Valley of southwestern Indiana and the adjacent portions of Kentucky: the Angel phase and the Caborn–Welborn phase. Special problems that are discussed in the chapter include (1) the question of the ethnicity of the late prehistoric–protohistoric Caborn–Welborn phase; (2) the strength and nature of the relationship that existed among the five large village sites of the Caborn–Welborn phase; (3) the continuity or discontinuity that existed between the Caborn–Welborn and Angel phase occupations; and (5) the relationship of the Angel phase to the Yankeetown phase and the nature of the initial Mississippian emergence in the study area.

New Evidence in the Upper Mississippi Valley for Premississippian Cultural Interaction with the American Bottom

The recovery of anomalous (red-slipped, shell/grog/sandstone-tempered) pottery from three sites in the Upper Mississippi Valley (UMV) prompted a petrographic analysis of thin sections of 21 vessels from these sites. The goal was to evaluate their possible derivation from the American Bottom, the nearest locality where such pottery commonly occurs. Among the 12 UMV vessels tempered with shell (nine red slipped), ten were determined, based on comparisons to thin sections of styl istically similar pottery from the American Bottom, to have essentially identical physical compositions. Additionally, four vessels suspected of being limestone-tempered were determined to have been tempered with a type of sandstone that outcrops only farther south in Illinois and Iowa. Of the three UMV sites, only the Fisher Mounds Site Complex (FMSC) produced the presumed exotic pottery in undisturbed, dated contexts. The petrographic evidence is consistent with the C-14 age and lithic assemblage at FMSC in suggesting an actual influx of people from the American Bottom into the UMV. The time of this influx, the Edelhardt phase of the Emergent Mississippian/Terminal Late Woodland period, ca. cal A.D. 1000-1050, is earlier than previously believed, i.e., precedes the main Mississippian period in the American Bottom.

Alluvial geoarchaeology of a Middle Archaic Mound complex in the lower Mississippi Valley, U.S.A

Geoarchaeology-an International Journal, 2006

The Nolan site (16MA201), 14 C dated 5200-4800 cal yr B.P. and located in the Tensas Basin of northeastern Louisiana, is the only recorded Middle Archaic mound site in the alluvial valley of the Mississippi River. Alluvial deposition has buried the Nolan site under 3-4 m of Holocene sediment, prohibiting traditional excavation of the site. Because data are unattainable by other means, soil coring and subsequent stratigraphic and sedimentological analyses permit reconstruction of the natural and cultural depositional history of the Nolan site. The sedimentary characteristics of basal deposits within cores suggest the presence of an Arkansas River paleochannel immediately adjacent to the site. Chronostratigraphic data show this channel was no longer active by ca. 5200 cal yr B.P. Contrary to existing models, the Arkansas River Meander Belt 4 and the Mississippi River Meander Belt 4 are not the same age. Microartifact and losson-ignition analyses of sediment identify natural versus cultural strata and permit the identification of artificial constructions-including four earthen mounds and one earthen ridge-at the Nolan site. Overbank sediments attributed to a mapped Mississippi River Stage 4 meander belt are dated ca. 4800-3800 cal yr B.P. This age is considerably younger than previous estimates and demonstrates the existing chronological models for Mississippi River meander belts must be carefully assessed. Core analyses also reveal flood-related crevasse splays deposited throughout the Tensas Basin after the occupation of the Nolan site. These deposits serve as relative chronological indicators and aid in stratigraphic assessments of the Nolan site. Reconstruction of the earthworks and their stratigraphic context reveals one of the largest and earliest Middle Archaic mound sites in North America.

Life at the River's Edge: Phase III Archaeological Data Recovery at Sites 1MB510 and 1MB511, Mobile, Alabama

Center for Archaeological Studies, Archaeological Monograph 14, 2018

The most important outcome this Phase III archaeological mitigation project was the discovery and documentation of extensive and elaborate water management features at 1MB510. Geoarchaeological, botanical, and microbotanical studies of the evidence from the very large Feature 3 ditch and associated ditches and berms revealed the presence of late colonial fields for maize and rice. The importance of wet rice cultivation to colonial Mobile, and indeed to the entire colonial South, has not yet received the attention it deserves from historians and archaeologists. This discovery at 1MB510 is an important step in raising awareness of the connections between colonial-era farming and the important role played by enslaved West Africans in eighteenth-century American Gulf Coast history.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (45)

  1. References Cited Beal, Phelan, and M.P. Blue 1878 City Directory and History of Montgomery, Alabama with a Sum- mary of Events in that History, Cal- endarically Arranged, Besides Other Valuable and Useful information. T.C. Bingham & Co., Printers and Binders. Montgomery, Ala.
  2. Blankenship, Sarah, Rob Bonny, Hamilton H. Bryant, and Allison M. Smith 2016 East Bound and Down:
  3. Moundville III Immigrants and the Ebert-Canebreak Site (1MC25), Ma- con County, Alabama. Paper present- ed at the Southeastern Archaeological Conference. Athens, Georgia.
  4. Blitz, John H., and Karl G. Lorenz 2006 The Chattahoochee Chiefdoms. The University of Alabama Press, Tus- caloosa.
  5. Boyd, Mark F. 1936 The Expedition of Marcos Del- gado from Apalache to the Upper Creeks in 1686. Florida Historical Quarterly 16:1-32.
  6. Brannon, Peter A. 1935 The Archaeology of Taskigi. Ar- row Points 20(5-6):44-45. 1938 Urn Burial in Central Alabama. American Antiquity 3(3): 228-335.
  7. Brooms, Bascom M., and David W. Chase 1977 An Archaeological Inventory of 1Pk2 within the Walnut Creek Reser- voir. Report Submitted to the United States Soil Conservation Service, Au- burn, by the Alabama Historical Com- mission, Montgomery.
  8. Chase, David W. 1967 New Pottery Types from Ala- bama. Southeastern Archaeological Conference, Bulletin 5:41-49. 1968 Pottery Typology Committee for Central Alabama. In Proceedings of the Twenty Fourth Southeastern Archaeological Conference, edited by Bettye J. Broyles, pp. 11-22. Bulletin 8, Morgantown. 1979 A Brief Synopsis of Central Al- abama Prehistory. Paper presented at the Winter Meeting of the Alabama Archaeological Society, Auburn. 1990 Terminal Woodland in Central Alabama: A Hypothetical Demise of a Tradition. Manuscript on file, Archae- ological Laboratory, Auburn Universi- ty Montgomery. 1998 Prehistoric Pottery of Central Alabama. Journal of Alabama Archae- ology 44(1-2):52-98.
  9. Clayton, Lawrence A., Vernon James Knight Jr, and Edwards C. Moore (editors) 1993a The De Soto Chronicles: The Expedition of Hernando De Soto to North America in 1539-1543, Volume I. The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa. 1993b The De Soto Chronicles: The Expedition of Hernando De Soto to North America in 1539-1543, Volume II. The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.
  10. Curren, Caleb B. 1984 The Protohistoric Period in Central Alabama. Alabama Tombig- bee Regional Commission, Camden. 1992 Archaeology in the Mauvila Chiefdom. The Mauvila Project of the Mobile Historic Development Com- mission, Mobile. 2017 Candlesticks of the Conquis- tadors: Rare Finds in Alabama. Elec- tronic document, http://archeologyink. com/candlesticks-of-the-conquista- dors-rare-finds-in-alabama/, accessed April 2017.
  11. Curren, Caleb, Steven Newby, and Erick Mosley 2006 Archaeological Excavations at an Early Mississippian Mound (1Ds172) in Central Alabama. Arche- ology Inc., Pensacola.
  12. Dickens, Roy S., Jr. 1971 Archaeology in the Jones Bluff Reservoir of Central Alabama. Journal of Alabama Archaeology 17(1):1-114.
  13. Fontana, Marisa 2007 Of Walls and War: Fortifica- tion and Warfare in the Mississippian Southeast. Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois, Chicago.
  14. Fuller, Richard S. 1985 The Bear Point Phase of the Pen- sacola Variant: The Proto Historic Pe- riod in Southwest Alabama. The Flori- da Anthropologist 38(1-2):150-156. 1998 Indian Pottery and Cultural Chronology of the Mobile-Tensaw Basin and Alabama Coast. Journal of Alabama Archaeology 44(1-2):1-51.
  15. Fuller, Richard S., and Noel R. Stowe 1982 A Proposed Typology for Late Shell Tempered Ceramics in the Mo- bile Bay/Mobile-Tensaw Delta Re- gion. In Archaeology in Southwest Al- abama: A Collection of Papers, edited by Cailup B. Curren, pp. 45-93. Ala- bama Tombigbee Regional Commis- sion, Camden, Alabama.
  16. Gatchet, Albert S. 1884 Migration Legend of the Creek Indians, Reprinted 1969. AMS Press, New York.
  17. Fundaburk, Emma Lila, and Mary Douglas Fundaburk Forman 1957 Sun Circles and Human Hands. Paragon Press, Montgomery, Alabama.
  18. Hally, David J. 1988 Archaeology and Settlement Plan of the King Site. In The King Site: Continuity and Contact in Six- teenth-Century Georgia, edited by Robert L. Blakeley, pp. 1-16. Univer- sity of Georgia Press, Athens.
  19. Jones, Calvin 1982 Southern Cult Manifestations at the Lake Jackson Site, Leon County, Florida: Salvage Excavation of Mound 3. Midcontinental Journal of Archae- ology 7(1):3-44.
  20. Knight, James Vernon 1985 Tukabatchee: Archaeological Investigations at an Historic Creek Town, Elmore County, Alabama:1984. The University of Alabama, Office of Archaeological Research, Report of Investigations 45. 1994 Ocmulgee Fields Culture and the Historical Development of Creek Ceramics. In Ocmulgee Archaeology, 1936-1986, edited by David Hally, pp. 181-189. The University of Georgia Press, Athens and London. 2010 Mound Excavations at Mound- ville: Architecture, Elites, and Social Order. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.
  21. Knight, Vernon James, and Marvin T. Smith 1980 Big Tallassee: A Contribution to Upper Creek Site Archaeology. Early Georgia 8(1-2):59-74.
  22. Knight, Vernon James, and Vincas P. Steponaitis 1998 A New History of Moundville. In Archaeology of the Moundville Chiefdom, edited by Knight, Vernon James and Vincas P. Steponaitis, pp. 1-25. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
  23. Krebs, Phillip and Polly Futato 1986 Ten Thousand Years of Alabama Prehistory: A Pictorial Resume. Alabama State Museum of Natural History, Bulletin 8. Tuscaloosa.
  24. Lankford, George E. 2008 Looking for Lost Lore: Studies in Folklore, Ethnology and Iconog- raphy. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.
  25. Lewis, Thomas M.N., and Madeline Kneberg 1946 Hiwassee Island: An Archaeo- logical Account of Four Tennessee In- dian Peoples. The University of Ten- nessee Press, Knoxville.
  26. Little, Keith J. 1999 The Role of Late Woodland In- teractions in the Emergence of Etowah. Southeastern Archaeology 18 (1) 45- 56. 2008 European Artifact Chronology and Impacts of Spanish Contact in the Sixteenth-Century Coosa Valley. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Alabama Department of Anthropolo- gy, Tuscaloosa.
  27. Little, Keith J., and Caleb Curren 1990 Conquest Archaeology of Ala- bama. In Columbian Consequences. Vol. 2: Archaeological Perspectives on the Spanish Borderlands East, edited by David Hurst Thomas, pp. 169-195.
  28. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 1995 The Moundville IV Phase on the Black Warrior River. Journal of Ala- bama Archaeology 41(1): 55-78.
  29. Mann, Jason A. 2004 A Reappraisal of the Walnut Creek Phase. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southeastern Archaeological Conference, St. Louis.
  30. Moore, Clarence B. 1899 Certain Aboriginal Remains of the Alabama River. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Phila- delphia 10:1-130. 1905 Certain Aboriginal Remains of the Black Warrior River. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Phila- delphia 13:479-605.
  31. Muller, Jon D. 1989 The Southern Cult. In The Southeastern Ceremonial Complex: Artifacts and Analysis, edited by Patri- cia Galloway, pp. 11-26. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.
  32. Nance, Rodger 1976 The Archaeological Sequence at Durant Bend, Dallas County, Ala- bama. Special Publication of the Ala- bama Archaeological Society 2.
  33. Phillips, Phillip 1970 Archaeological Survey in the Lower Yazoo Basin, Mississippi, 1949- 1955. Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, Papers 60. Harvard University, Cambridge.
  34. Priestly, Herbert Ingram (editor and translator) 2010 The Luna Papers, 1559-1561, Volumes 1-2. The University of Ala- bama Press, Tuscaloosa. Regnier, Amanda 2006 The Social Composition of Late Mississippian Towns in the Alabama River Valley as Understood Through Ceramic Styles. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Univer- sity of Alabama. 2014
  35. Reconstructing Tascalusa's Chiefdom. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.
  36. Sheldon, Craig T., Jr. 1974 The Mississippian-Historic Transition in Central Alabama. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oregon. 2000 Introduction. In Southern and Central Alabama Expeditions of Clar- ence Broomfield Moore, edited by Craig T. Sheldon, Jr., pp. 1-114. The University of Alabama Press, Tuscalo- osa. 2009 The Present State of Archaeo- logical Survey and Site File Data for the Alabama River and Adjacent Re- gions. In The Search for Mabila: The Decisive Battle Between Hernando de Soto and Chief Tascalusa, edited by Vernon James Knight, Jr., pp. 107-128. The University of Alabama Press, Tus- caloosa.
  37. Sheldon Craig T., Jr., and Ned J. Jenkins In Press Artifacts of the De Soto and De Luna y Arellano Expeditions Through Central Alabama. In The Des- tiny of their Manifests: Modeling Six- teenth-Century Entrada Assemblages in North America, edited by Clay Ma- thers and Jeffrey Mitchem. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.
  38. Steponaitis, Vincas P. 1983 Ceramics, Chronology, and Community Patterns: An Archaeolog- ical Study at Moundville. Academic Press, New York.
  39. Stowe, Noel R. 1982 A Preliminary Report on the Pine Log Creek Site, 1BA462. Unpublished report, Archaeological Research Lab- oratory, University of South Alabama, Mobile.
  40. Walling, Richard 1993 Lamar in the Middle Coosa Riv- er Drainage: The Ogletree Island Site (1Ta238), a Kymulga Phase Farm- stead. In Archaeological Survey and Testing in the Coosa River Valley, Ala- bama, pp.33-48. Alabama Museum of Natural History. Bulletin 15.
  41. Waselkov, Gregory A. 1989 Seventeenth-Century Trade in the Colonial Southeast. Southeastern Archaeology 8(2):117-133. 1994 History of the Alabama Anthro- pological Society. Southeastern Ar- chaeology 13 (1):64-76.
  42. Webb, William and Charles Wilder 1951 An Archaeological Survey of the Guntersville Basin on the Tennessee River in Northern Alabama. Universi- ty of Kentucky Press, Lexington. Welch, Paul D. 1986 Models of Chiefdom Econo- my: Prehistoric Moundville as a Case Study. PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Mich- igan, Ann Arbor. 1998 Outlying Sites Within the Moundville Chiefdom. In Archaeolo- gy of the Moundville Chiefdom, edit- ed by Vernon Knight, Jr. and Vicas P. Steponaitis, pp. 133-166. Smithsonian Press, Washington D.C.
  43. Wesson, Cameron B., James A. Wall, and David W. Chase 2001 A Spaghetti Style Gorget from the Jere Shine Site (1MT6), Montgom- ery County, Alabama. Journal of Ala- bama Archaeology 47(2): 132-152.
  44. Willey, Gordon R. and William H. Sears 1952 The Kasita Site. Southern Indian Studies 4:3-18.
  45. Williams, Mark and Gary Shapiro 1990 Lamar Archaeology. In Lamar Archaeology: Mississippian Chief- doms in the Deep South. Edited by Mark Williams and Gary Shapiro, pp. 10-26. The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa and London.

Related papers

Ceramic Chronology, Social Identity, and Social Boundaries: Central Alabama and Neighbors 100 B.C.-A.D. 1350

Journal of Alabama Archaeology, 2014

Handbook of Alabama's Prehistoric Indians and Artifacts, Second Edition

Handbook of Alabama's Prehistoric Indians and Artifacts, Second Edition, 2019

Second Edition This book is an introduction and guidebook to stone and pottery artifacts found in Alabama that were made by pre-contact American Indians. There is a focus on temporally diagnostic projectile points and pottery. The intended audience is the archaeological novice, though information presented is data-based, and fully cited. In addition to text by Johnson, sections are written by archaeologists (Ian Brown, Ashley Dumas, Steven Meredith, and Teresa Paglione) with expertise on pertinent topics. ISBN-13: 9780999383063

Mississippian Ceramics and Settlement Complexity: Insights from the Beasley Mounds (40SM43), Smith County, Tennessee

Tennessee Archaeology 6(1-2):149-163, 2012

Although the Beasley Mounds site (40SM43) has been known since the early nineteenth century, only brief antiquarian notes and limited collections have been available to evaluate its relationship to the Middle Cumberland culture sites of the Central Basin. As part of the on-going efforts of the Middle Cumberland Mississippian Survey to refine the boundaries and chronology of the region, we directed a small-scale mapping and excavation project at Beasley Mounds in early 2008. Resulting ceramic samples suggest that the site residents were more closely affiliated culturally to those of the upper Cumberland and East Tennessee than to their nearer neighbors to the west. A single radiocarbon date from platform mound construction at the site suggests that it served as a socio-political center contemporaneous with those at the nearby Castalian Springs and Sellars sites to the west and south -- but was occupied by people whose material culture was (ethnically?) distinct from those to the west and south and more closely related to those from the east and north.

Mississippian Monumentality in the Yazoo Basin: Recent Investigations at the Carson Site (22CO505), Northwestern Mississippi

Southeastern Archaeology, 2017

Investigations at the Carson site (22CO505), located in Coahoma County, Mississippi, have uncovered data on the development of a large Mississippian mound center dating to the period from A.D. 1200 through European contact. Recent sediment coring, excavation, artifact analyses, and radiocarbon and optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating shed light on earthworks and household structures at Carson, and on Mississippian culture in the Yazoo Basin more generally. Sediment coring demonstrates a laterally transgressing Mississippi River system deposited coarse sandy ridges and clay-filled swales underneath a surface horizon comprised of variously coarse to medium-fine sediment originating from generalized overbank flooding. In some instances, flood-borne sediments were found on mound flanks, indicating that at times river-based flooding may have interrupted mound construction. Sediment coring and trench excavation also demonstrate that Carson’s Mound D was built in four stages, with Stages II and III comprising the major stages of earth moving. Excavations on the mound summit reveal evidence of several superimposed structures that were burned in place and likely used for the production of stone, shell, and wooden craft items, perhaps related to Mississippi Ideational Interaction Sphere (MIIS) paraphernalia. Here we describe recent investigations at Carson and present preliminary findings; forthcoming publications will emphasize strategies of power, monumentality, craft production, and Mississippian exchange systems.

Characteristics and Functions of Non-Mound Mississippian Sites: A Case Study of Fitzner North End (9SN256)

2018

The Mississippian time period is marked by cultural changes that occurred at the end of the Late Woodland period and generally concludes with European contact (A.D. 900-1600). Below is a summary of trends and characteristics from historical accounts and archaeological data of the Savannah River valley and beyond. Stratified Societies Evidence of stratification is seen in mortuary practices, specifically through grave goods, architecture, artifact types and materials, and skeletal remains. Anderson provides summary data for sites in the Savannah River valley showing burials in the mounds, while in the habitation areas they are usually under the domestic structure (Haven Home, Irene, Chauga, Beaverdam Creek, Hollywood, Rucker's Bottom, I.C. Few) (1994: 315). At Beaverdam Creek, Chauga, and I.C. Few, burial trends include a higher number of females buried in the habitation areas when compared to mound burials (Anderson 1994: 314). In addition, mound burials contained a higher number of grave goods with a higher proportion of these burials being male when compared to burials in the habitation areas (Anderson 1994: 314). Skeletal remains typically show that healthier individuals were interred in mounds when compared with the individuals interred in habitation areas (Anderson 1994: 314-316). These trends likely indicate a two-tier socio-political system with males as figureheads who had access to grave goods and culturally significant architecture (e.g. mounds). Platform mounds typically contain summit structures thought to be elite residences (Wood 2009: 1-5). These rectangular earthen mounds rise high above the ground surface physically and metaphorically separating the ruling party or chief from the remaining population. Usually accompanied by a habitation area and a large cleared and cleaned public gathering area, also known as a plaza, mound construction requires high energy costs and social organization (Hally 2006: 26). Rituals and beliefs are intertwined with this socio-political system, binding the nucleated mound sites with the smaller dispersed sites, subsequently confirming and supporting the elite. For example, Emerson discusses the dualistic nature of beliefs displayed in symbolic architecture and artifacts of power, such as mounds, vessels, and figurines at 20 Cahokia and the surrounding areas (1997). These symbols of power and stratification can also be seen at the smaller, dispersed sites, but at a smaller scale when compared to the larger nucleated mound sites. Emerson discusses how symbols of power created a "functional political unit whose internal cohesiveness may have been encouraged by kin ties as well as by the presence of elite control of supernatural and natural resources (1997: 249-250)." Domestic architecture reflects status through size and location comparable to other structures at the same site. For example, larger structures closer to or on the mound, partitioned by a wall or palisade, or isolated from other structures indicate differential status. Structures inhabited by the non-elite were usually similar in size and construction (Steere 2017). These structures were usually located in a particular area of the site, segregated from the larger buildings. Steere states that domestic structures are "usually constructed by social groups larger than households," indicating that evidence for socio-political organization (e.g. social stratification) is also seen at the household level (2017: 179). Domestic-related rituals and ceremonialism are also seen in house characteristics such as orientation, size, and shape as well as the presence of a certain number of posts, hearth, and types of artifacts (Steere 2017: 111). These kinds of patterns "may symbolically represent sacred locations or be models of cosmography" (Gougeon 2002: 78). Artifacts are often classified as domestic or ritualistic/ceremonial. Typical domestic artifacts include projectile points/knives (PP/Ks) and other functional tools (e.g. axes, scrapers, drills, needles), pottery, and debitage from stone tool and pottery production. These artifacts can illustrate gendered activity areas, such as male flint knapping and female pottery-making areas (Gougeon 2002: 79-80, Steere 2017: 112). Ritualistic and/or ceremonial items more elite in nature are typically made with ornate designs/carving from materials such as bone, clay, copper, or shell. These items can include effigy pipes, figures, and bowls, gorgets, beads, and elaborate pottery (King 2007). Some are religious in nature and are associated with the Southeastern Ceremonial Complex (SECC), where these items were traded and Horticulture and domesticated crop varieties became more intensive and culturally important through time beginning in the Late Woodland period and culminated in use and importance during the Middle to Late Mississippian period (Anderson 1994: 317-322). The three main crops or the "three sisters" include corn, beans, and squash most likely grown by techniques like slash and burn in the floodplains. Other important crops include pumpkin, marsh elder, gourd, and sunflower (Smith 1978, Bowne 2013). Sites in the Savannah River valley (Rucker's Bottom, Clyde Gulley, and Beaverdam Creek) display evidence of corn and gourd (Anderson 1994: 228-230, 317-322). Another site in Coastal Plain South Carolina, 38BK235, also shows evidence of corn (Brooks et al. 1984). These sites display similar hunting and gathering practices and contain a wide variety of exploited resources, with less reliance on cultigen crops as evident in the flora specimens. Subsistence data not only shows what people ate and how they lived but sometimes exhibits evidence of social stratification and tribute activities. Rucker's Bottom, discussed previously, displays the intensive use of corn between A.D. 1200 and 1300, with a decline around A.D. 1400 likely due to a poor growing season (Anderson 1994: 319). A highly diversified subsistence strategy remained important from A.D. 1200 through A.D. 1400. But based on skeletal analysis, this evidence of a rich and diversified diet was not evident in the skeletal remains dating between A.D. 1200 and 1300 (Anderson 1994: 318-322). Anderson suggests that most of the corn was grown as a tribute to the political center during A.D. 1200-1300, contributing to the skeletal stress of the inhabitants (1994: 319). However, skeletal remains dating from around A.D. 1400 did not show any evidence of skeletal stress, suggesting that resources no longer left the site as tribute (Anderson 1994: 318-322). Social stratification and tribute activities can also be seen from A.D. 1200 to 1300 through the absence of hindquarter cuts of meats, with the presence of these prime cuts of meats reappearing around A.D. 1400 (Anderson 1994: 318-322). Anderson concludes that tribute practices likely occurred early on in the founding of the subservient Rucker's Bottom site (A.D. 1200-1300), with the site increasing in socio-political significance later on (around A.D. 1400), no longer required to contribute their resources to the political center (1994: 318-322).

Mississippian Feature Patterning, Site Structure, and Community Organization at the Cox Site (1JA176), Jackson County, Alabama

Geophysical investigations at the Cox site (1JA176) provided new insight into feature patterning, site structure, and community organization of the Mississippian component. Results indicate previous WPA excavations of the mound, two plazas, multiple domestic structures, possible public buildings, and a large ditch system. Prior to the geophysics survey, only the mound was known in detail. These results were compared to similar sites in eastern Tennessee and northern Georgia. We argue that the Mississippian component at the Cox site was a well organized community that dated to the late Crow Creek phase and is contemporaneous with the Dallas, Mouse Creek, and Lamar cultures in the region.

Archaeological Investigations in the Upper Tombigbee Valley, Mississippi: Phase II

1983

: Data recovery to mitigate construction impacts was accomplished by the University of West Florida's Office of Cultural and Archaeological Research at four sites in the canal section of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway. Large scale excavations conducted at the Beech and Oak sites, 22It622 and 22It624, producted a wealth of information on the preceramic Late Archaic occupations of these two sites, as well as their other prehistoric components. With some engineering to permit similar large scale excavations below the water table, investigations at the Hickory site, 22It621, yielded evidence of Early Archaic habitation in the buried paleosol, as well as later components above it. At a site with predominantly late prehistoric cultural deposits, 22It606, the many features excavated provided unusual evidence of Late Woodland/Mississippian ceramic and subsistence systems, as well as similar activities of earlier and later peoples. All four sites inves...

Mississippian Beginnings: Multiple Perspectives on Migration, Monumentality, and Religion in the Prehistoric Eastern United States. David G. Anderson. 2017. In Mississippian Beginnings, edited by Gregory Wilson, pp. 293–321. University of Florida Press, Gainesville.

Mississippian Beginnings, edited by Gregory Wilson. University of Florida Press, Gainesville, 2017

A Comparison of Artifacts and Activities among Mound Area Contexts at Town Creek, A Mississippian Site in Piedmont North Carolina

2012

Middle Archaic through Mississippian Occupations at Site 40DR226 along the Tennessee River in Decatur County

Tennessee Archaeology 2(1) pp. 19–31, 2006

The Nashville office of TRC, Inc. conducted archaeological excavations and geoarchaeological deep testing at prehistoric site 40DR226 during the summer of 2004. This site, located along the Tennessee River in Decatur County, yielded intact and deeply stratified midden deposits along the top bank of the Tennessee River. Radiocarbon dates and recovered artifacts indicate the site was occupied between the Middle Archaic and Mississippian periods (ca. 8000–400 BP). A sequence of ceramic sherds associated with the Late Gulf Formational, Copena, and Miller III ceramic traditions (spanning the period ca. 2250–950 BP) are of particular interest.

Academia
Academia
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp