Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.

Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

2008. The Indus-Mesopotamia relationship reconsidered (Gs Elisabeth During Caspers)

Profile image of julian E readejulian E reade
visibility

description

9 pages

Sign up for access to the world's latest research

checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact

Abstract
sparkles

AI

The paper reexamines the historical and prehistorical relationships between the Indus Valley and Mesopotamia, suggesting that long-distance trade initiated from the Indus is pivotal to understanding their interactions. Utilizing recent archaeological findings and chronological studies, it discusses the significant impact of environmental changes on these relations and the cultivation of aquatic resources that parallel the genesis of civilization in these regions. Additionally, it critiques past scholarly interpretations, emphasizing the importance of a multifaceted agricultural and aquatic economy in the development of Sumerian civilization.

Key takeaways
sparkles

AI

  1. The Indus-Mesopotamia relationship necessitates reconsideration due to emerging archaeological and chronological evidence.
  2. Recent studies suggest long-distance trade began from the Indus towards Mesopotamia in prehistory.
  3. The sea-level rise dramatically altered the geography, impacting the Indus-Mesopotamia connection.
  4. Evidence points to a rich aquatic diet influencing civilization emergence in both regions.
  5. Trade patterns evolved, with the Indus potentially influencing Mesopotamian commerce significantly.
Figures (4)
Fig. 1: The western coastline of the Indian Ocean about 10,000 BC; an approximation necessarily inaccurate in detail (drawn by Ann Searight).
Fig. 1: The western coastline of the Indian Ocean about 10,000 BC; an approximation necessarily inaccurate in detail (drawn by Ann Searight).
Fig. 2: Alternative chronologies for Early Mesopotamia and the Gulf trade.
Fig. 2: Alternative chronologies for Early Mesopotamia and the Gulf trade.
Fig. 3: The evolution of commercial expeditions between the Indus and Mesopotamia: one of many possible models sug- gesting the principal destinations of outward-bound ships.
Fig. 3: The evolution of commercial expeditions between the Indus and Mesopotamia: one of many possible models sug- gesting the principal destinations of outward-bound ships.

Related papers

Trade Routes and Commercial Networks in the Persian Gulf during the Third Millennium BC

Throughout the third millennium BC, long-distance trade exchanges between Mesopotamia and the east —the Iranian Plateau, Afghanistan, Baluchistan, and Indus valley— were conducted predominantly via maritime routes in the Persian Gulf. A central place in this interregional commercial network was occupied by the territory of Kerman (ancient Marhashi), which, apart from being an exporter of locally produced luxury items (such as the highly decorated chlorite vessels), served as a transshipment area for the lapis lazuli, gold, and tin incoming overland from Afghanistan. The Gulf trade reached its apogee in the Sargonic (= Old Akkadian) period, when, as a consequence of their conquests in Iran and throughout the Gulf region, the Sargonic kings created the first great commercial highway of the Near East, through the linking of a number of subregional trading networks. Starting in Meluhha (Indus Valley), this highway ran along the coast of the Persian Gulf via Makkan (Oman) and Tilmun (Bahrain) to southern Babylonia, continuing then along the Euphrates all the way to the Mediterranean coast. Following the Sargonic collapse (at ca. 2200 BC), for a century or so the Gulf trade came to a virtual standstill. It was subsequently revived by the kings of the Third Dynasty of Ur (2100-2000 BC), though on a more limited scale. The paper will study the changing history of the Gulf trade during the third millennium BC, and identify the causes of its decline in the beginning centuries of the second millennium BC.

Davide Nadali, 2021, Cities in the Water: Waterscape and Evolution of Urban Civilisation in Southern Mesopotamia as Seen from Tell Zurghul, Iraq

Ancient canals, marshes and proximity of the sea heavily characterised the landscape and environment of the ancient State of Lagash in southern Iraq, from the mid-fifth to the second millennium BC: indeed the diachronic changes that can be analysed thanks to geological and archaeological observation and investigation show how this waterscape definitely influenced the shapes of settlement and the organisation of ancient societies from a cultural, economic and biological point of view. Recent excavations at Tell Zurghul in southern Iraq are giving the possibility to test, in the field, the presence of water: ancient cuneiform sources, from the mid-third millennium BC, show the intense programme of the rulers of the State of Lagash in managing water through the construction of canals and the regulation of marshes characterised by marine water due to the proximity of the sea. In this respect, human actions (such as the digging of canals) and natural conditions (such as the reduction in the fifth millennium and the progressive growth in the fourth millennium BC of water level) are recognisable in the field, and they of course explain the morphology of the site in the past and the changes it suffered even in the present: water in fact is doubtless a fundamental resource for suitable conditions of formation and growth of a urban centre, but it also limits the possibility of extending occupation on the entire surface (as, e.g. the exploitation of lands for agricultural purposes).

Mesopotamia geomorphology - De Klerk & Joosten

The fluvial landscape of lower Mesopotamia: an overview of geomorphology and human impact, 2021

To understand the perception of wetlands by ancient Mesopotamians, it is crucial to have an understanding of the natural landscape "between the rivers". This paper provides an overview on the geomorphology of the region and the human-landscape interaction. In the course of time, starting in the early or mid-Holocene, the land “between the rivers” lost its natural character and was transformed into an increasingly cultural landscape with an intensive human impact. When and to what extent natural floodbasin marshes still existed is unknown, but they will have gradually decreased as a consequence of increasing population and expanding agriculture.

Petrie, C.A. (2014), Iran and Uruk Mesopotamia: Chronologies and Connections in the Fourth Millennium BC, McMahon and Crawford (eds), Preludes to Urbanism: The Late Chalcolithic of Mesopotamia
The Transregional Origins of Early Mesopotamian Civilization

The ‘city’ across time, Atti Convegni Lincei 354, M. FRANGIPANE (ed.), Roma 2023 (ISBN: 978-88-218-1243-9)

A geopolitical chiasmus can be observed in the historical trajectories of urban societies across the breadth and length of the Tigris-Euphrates rivers in the fourth millennium BC: the power, reach, and wealth of polities in Upper Mesopotamia contracted as those of their counterparts in the alluvial lowlands of southern Mesopotamia expanded. Transregional transformations of this scale are difficult to comprehend except as long-term consequences of differential rates of regional capital accumulation, almost certainly arising from shifting patterns of long-distance trade. The chiasmus appears to have begun sometime about the transition from the first to the second quarter of the fourth millennium, just as southern Mesopotamian polities first became able to systematically tap into preexisting trade networks allowing access to coveted highland resources by marketing finished woolen textiles transported on the backs of newly domesticated pack animals. As trade flows that earlier had focused on northern centers started to shift southwards, alluvial cities––embedded in a more permissive, productive, and resilient environment than their northern counterparts––grew rapidly, in large part by adopting, improving, and scaling-up many of the organizational innovations that earlier had fueled the rise of their more precocious northern peers.

Holocene fluvial and anthropogenic processes in the region of Uruk in southern Mesopotamia

For decades, it has been unclear as to how the world's first cities, in southern Mesopotamia, not only arose in a fluvial environment but also how this environment changed. This paper seeks to understand the long-term fluvial history of the region around Uruk, a major early city, in relation to water-human interactions. This paper applies geomorphological, historical and archaeological approaches and reveals that the Uruk region in southern Mesopotamia had been under the influence of freshwater fluvial environment since the early Holocene. It further demonstrates how canals and long-term human activities since the mid Holocene have been superimposed on the natural river channel patterns. Fieldwork has been conducted to ground-truth features identified applying remote sensing techniques. Five sediment cores were analysed to elucidate palaeoenvironmental changes. Radiocarbon ages for organic samples suggest that the oldest sediment layers, at a depth of 12.5 m, are from the Early Holocene, while results from diatom analyses imply that the whole sediment column was deposited in a freshwater environment. Intensive networks of palaeochannels and archaeological sites within the study area have been reconstructed and these networks have been divided into four different time intervals based on changes in channel courses. The first is from the early 4th to the late 1st millennium BCE; the second is from the late 1st millennium BCE to the middle 2nd millennium CE; the third lasted from after the Islamic period until the 1980s; the fourth is from the 1980s until the present. Key results include evidence for freshwater environments and favourable settlement conditions had already formed by the 8th millennium BCE. The favourable settlement environment resulted in stable (long-lived) canals between the 4th millennium BCE and 1st millennium CE. A significant settlement and irrigation expansion occurred in the early 1st millennium CE. Major abandonment ensued in the late 1st millennium CE and lasted until the mid 2nd millennium CE.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (40)

  1. Aström, P. (ed). 1989. High, Middle or Low: Acts of an International Colloquium on Absolute Chronology held at the University of 3100- 2700 2600 2400- 2300 2200 2150- 2100 2050 2018- 1930 1911 1900- 1650 Jamdat Nasr- Early Dynastic I Early Dynastic II Early Dynastic III End of Early Dynastic Middle Agade End of Agade Early-Middle Ur III End of Ur III Isin-Larsa/Old Babylonian
  2. Indus Magan Dilmun Mesopota- Gothenburg 20th-22nd August 1987. (3 volumes). Gothenburg.
  3. Belcher, W.R. 1994. Multiple approaches towards reconstruction of fishing technology: net making and the Indus Valley tradition. Pp. 129-141 in J.M. Kenoyer (ed) From Sumer to Meluhha: Contributions to the Archaeology of South and West Asia in Memory of George F. Dales, Jr. (Wisconsin Archaeological Reports, vol. 3). Wisconsin.
  4. Biagi, P. 1994. A radiocarbon chronology for the aceramic shell- middens of coastal Oman. Arabian Archaeology and Epigraphy 5: 17-31.
  5. Bibby, G. 1970. Looking for Dilmun. London.
  6. Braunswig, R.H. 1975. Radiocarbon dating and the Indus civiliza- tion: calibration and chronology. East and West 25: 111-145.
  7. Chakrabarti, D.K. 1990. The external trade of the Indus civilization. New Delhi.
  8. Collon, D. 1986. Catalogue of the Western Asiatic Seals in the British Museum: Cylinder seals III: Isin-Larsa and Old Babylonian Periods. London.
  9. ---. 1990. Interpreting the Past: Near Eastern Seals. London.
  10. Crawford, H.E.W. 1973. Mesopotamia's invisible exports in the third millennium B.C. World Archaeology 5: 232-241.
  11. Diakonoff, I.M. 1992. Elam. Pp. 1-24 in I. Gershevitch (ed) The Cambridge History of Iran. Vol. 2: The Median and Achaemenian periods. Cambridge.
  12. During Caspers, E.C.L. 1979. Sumer, coastal Arabia and the Indus valley in Protoliterate and Early Dynastic eras: supporting evidence for a cultural linkage. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient XXII: 121-135.
  13. ---. 1991. The Indus Valley 'unicorn': a Near Eastern connec- tion? Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient XXXIV: 312-350.
  14. Edens, C. 1993. Indus-Arabian interaction during the Bronze Age: a review of evidence. Pp. 335-363 in G.L. Possehl (ed) Harappan Civilization: a recent perspective. Second revised edition. New Delhi.
  15. Franke-Vogt, U. 1994. The "Early Period" at Mohenjo-daro. Pp. 27-49 in J.M. Kenoyer (ed) From Sumer to Meluhha: Contributions to the Archaeology of South and West Asia in Memory of George F. Dales, Jr. (Wisconsin Archaeological Reports, vol. 3). Wiscon- sin.
  16. Gasche, H., J.A. Armstrong, S.W. Cole & V.G. Gurzadyan. 1998. Dating the Fall of Babylon: a Reappraisal of Second-Millennium Chronology (A Joint Ghent-Chicago Project) (MHEM IV). Ghent & Chicago.
  17. Glover, I.C. 1996. Early trade between India and Southeast Asia. Pp. 365-400 in J.E. Reade (ed) The Indian Ocean in Antiquity. London.
  18. Herman, C.F. 1996. "Harappan" Gujarat: the archaeology-chro- nology connection. Paléorient 22: 77-112.
  19. Høyrup, J. 1992. Sumerian: the descendant of a proto-historical creole? An alternative approach to the "Sumerian problem". Annali del seminario di studi del mondo classico, Sezione linguistica 14: 21-73.
  20. Kinnier Wilson, J.V. 1987. Fish rations and the Indus script: some new arguments in the case for accountancy. South Asian Studies 3: 41-46.
  21. Lal, B.B. 1994. The chronological horizon of the Mature Indus civilization. Pp. 15-25 in J.M. Kenoyer (ed) From Sumer to Meluhha: Contributions to the Archaeology of South and West Asia in Memory of George F. Dales, Jr. (Wisconsin Archaeological Reports, vol. 3). Wisconsin.
  22. Mallowan, M.E.L. & J.C. Rose. 1935. Excavations at Tall Arpachiyah, 1933. Iraq II: 1-178.
  23. Meyer, C., J.M. Todd & C.W. Beck. 1991. From Zanzibar to the Zagros: a copal pendant from Eshnunna. Journal of Near Eastern Studies L: 289-298.
  24. Michalowski, P. 1988. Magan and Meluhha once again. Journal of Cuneiform Studies 40: 156-164.
  25. Nair, R.R. & N.H. Hashimi. 1988. Absence of terraces on a submerged carbonate bank and its implication to Holocene sea level transgression on the western continental margin of India. Pp. 83-86 in S.R. Rao (ed) Marine Archaeology of Indian Ocean Countries. Proceedings of the First Indian Conference on Marine Archaeology of Indian Ocean Countries -Oct 1987. Goa.
  26. Possehl, G.L. 1996. Meluhha. Pp. 133-208 in J.E. Reade (ed) The Indian Ocean in Antiquity. London.
  27. Possehl, G.L. & P.C. Rissman. 1992. The chronology of pre- historic India: from earliest times to the Iron Age. Pp 465-490 in R.W. Ehrich (ed) Chronologies in Old World Archaeology, vol. I. Third edition. Chicago & London.
  28. Potts, D.T. 1990. The Arabian Gulf in Antiquity. Vol. I: From Prehis- tory to the Fall of the Achaemenid Empire. Oxford.
  29. ---. 1993. Tell Abraq and the Harappan tradition in South- eastern Arabia. Pp. 324-333 in G.L. Possehl (ed) Harappan Civilization: a recent perspective. Second revised edition. New Delhi.
  30. Ratnagar, S. 1981. Encounters. The Westerly Trade of the Harappa Civilization. Delhi.
  31. Reade, J.E. 1979. Early Etched Beads and the Indus-Mesopotamia Trade (British Museum Occasional Paper, no. 2). London.
  32. ---. 1986. Commerce or conquest: variations in the Mesopo- tamia-Dilmun relationship. Pp. 325-334 in Sheikha H.A. Al Khalifa & M. Rice (eds) Bahrain through the Ages: The Archae- ology. London.
  33. ---. 1995. Magan and Meluhha merchants at Ur? Pp. 597-600 in U. Finkbeiner, R. Dittmann & H. Hauptmann (eds) Beiträge zur Kulturgeschichte Vorderasiens: Festschrift für Rainer Michael Boehmer. Mainz.
  34. ---. 1996. Introduction: Evolution in Indian Ocean studies. Pp. 13-20 in J.E. Reade (ed) The Indian Ocean in Antiquity. London.
  35. ---. 1997. Sumerian origins. Pp. 221-229 in I.L. Finkel & M.J. Geller (eds) Sumerian Gods and their Representations. (Cuneiform Monographs 7). Groningen.
  36. ---. 2001. Assyrian king-lists, the Royal Tombs of Ur, and Indus origins. Journal of Near Eastern Studies LX: 1-29.
  37. Salonen, A. 1970. Die Fischerei im alten Mesopotamien nach Sumerisch-Akkadischen Quellen. (Annales Academiae Scientia- rum Fennicae, Series B, vol. 166). Helsinki.
  38. Shaffer, J.G. 1992. The Indus Valley, Baluchistan, and Helmand traditions: Neolithic through Bronze Age. Pp. 441-464 in R.W. Ehrich (ed) Chronologies in Old World Archaeology, vol. 1. Third edition. Chicago & London.
  39. Vogt, B. 1996. Bronze Age maritime trade in the Indian Ocean: Harappan traits on the Oman peninsula. Pp. 107-132 in J.E. Reade (ed) The Indian Ocean in Antiquity. London.
  40. J. READE, Dept. of Western Asiatic Antiquities, The British Museum, London WC1B 3DG, United Kingdom. julianreade@yahoo.com

Related papers

Sea Level Changes in the Mesopotamian Plain and Limits of the Arabian Gulf: A Critical Review

2020

The Mesopotamian Plain is a vast almost flat plain which descends in elevation towards southeast until it reaches the sea level along the Gulf shore. The plain covers the central part of Iraq; it i ...

Potts 2016 - Trends and patterns in the archaeology and pre-modern history of the Gulf region. In J.E. Peterson, ed. The Emergence of the Gulf States: Studies in Modern History. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 19-42.
Tectonics and Neotectonics of the Mesopotamian Plain: A Critical Review

2020

The Mesopotamian Plain is a part of the Mesopotamia Foredeep of the Zagros Foreland Basin and is a part of the Zagros Fold – Thrust Belt. The plain covers the central part of Iraq and extends south ...

Geomorphology, Stratigraphy and Tectonics of the Mesopotamian Plain, Iraq: A Critical Review

Geotectonics

The Mesopotamian Plain is part of the Mesopotamia which extends for vast area bigger than the plain. The plain is almost flat and vast lowland, which has clearly defined physiographic boundaries with the other surrounding physiographic provinces. The plain is a huge accumulation geomorphologic unit, where the fluvial, lacustrine, and the Aeolian landforms prevail; the fluvial units being the abundant among others. However, estuarine and marine forms also are developed, but restricted to the extreme southeastern reaches of the plain. The Mesopotamian Plain is covered totally by Quaternary sediments among which the fluvial origin is the most prevailing and more specifically the flood plain sediments. The flood plain sediments are the Holocene in age, whereas the Pleistocene sediments are restricted to alluvial fan sediments and river terraces. The flood plain sediments cover majority of the Mesopotamian Plain, whereas the alluvial sediments are restricted to the northern-eastern, western and southern peripheral parts only. Different geomorphological features indicate the Neotectonic activity in the plain, such as migrations of rivers due to growing of subsurface anticlines. The extreme southeastern part is covered by the tidal flat and sabkha sediments. Marshes and shallow depressions are also covered by the Holocene sediments which are contaminated by the Aeolian sediments. Mesopotamian Plain is a part of the Mesopotamian Foredeep which is a part of the Zagros Foreland Basin including the Zagros Fold-Thrust Belt. It is large continuously subsiding basin since the Upper Miocene (11.62 Ma). The plain shows no structural features on the surface, except the main fault escarpment representing the part of Abu Jir Active Fault Zone. However, the rolling topography, in the northern parts of the plain indicates subsurface anticlines that are still growing up, such as Balad, Samarra, Tikrit and Baiji anticlines indicating the Neotectonic activity. Moreover, many buried subsurface anticlines are present in different parts of the plain. All of them are growing anticlines and have caused continuous shift to Tigris and Euphrates rivers and their distributaries indicating the Neotectonic activities. The minimum and maximum subsidence amounts in the plain since the Upper Miocene are zero and-2500 m, respectively.

New Insights on the Role of Environmental Dynamics Shaping Southern Mesopotamia: From the Pre-Ubaid to the Early Islamic Period

Iraq, 2019

Recent fieldwork and archival sedimentary materials from southern Iraq have revealed new insights into the environment that shaped southern Mesopotamia from the pre-Ubaid (early Holocene) until the early Islamic period. These data have been combined with northern Iraqi speleothem, or stalagmite, data that have revealed relevant palaeoclimate information. The new results are investigated in light of textual sources and satellite remote sensing work. It is evident that areas south of Baghdad, and to the region of Uruk, were already potentially habitable between the eleventh and early eighth millennia B.C., suggesting there were settlements in southern Iraq prior to the Ubaid. Date palms, the earliest recorded for Iraq, are evident before 10,000 B.C., and oak trees are evident south of Baghdad in the early Holocene but disappeared after the mid-sixth millennium B.C. New climate results suggest increased aridity after the end of the fourth millennium B.C. For the third millennium B.C. t...

Related topics

  • Harappan Civilization
  • Academia
    Academia
    580 California St., Suite 400
    San Francisco, CA, 94104
    © 2025 Academia. All rights reserved

    [8]ページ先頭

    ©2009-2025 Movatter.jp