Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.

Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Buddhism and Family

Profile image of Elizabeth (Liz) Wilson (please see Liz [Elizabeth] Wilson for full information)Elizabeth (Liz) Wilson (please see Liz [Elizabeth] Wilson for full information)
https://doi.org/10.1111/REC3.12107
visibility

description

11 pages

Sign up for access to the world's latest research

checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact

Abstract

The received wisdom about Buddhism depicts it as an otherworldly religion that values the solitary monk or nun and devalues family life and the social world in general. Recent scholarship, however, reveals evidence that this picture is seriously flawed. Yes, there are many seminal Buddhist texts that suggest that monastics should destroy familial ties to whatever extent is possible. But there are many other texts, as well as inscriptions and other forms of material culture such as art and architecture, that indicate that in both the past and the present, Buddhist monks and nuns have remained embedded in family life in ways that might surprise us. Moreover, many Buddhist institutions have been modeled on the family and rely on familial loyalties for their strength and endurance. Familial ties have shaped the expression of Buddhism in every Buddhist society, structuring Buddhist institutions and providing a fundamental language and form of practice.

FAQs

sparkles

AI

What evidence supports familial ties in Buddhist monastic life?add

Recent scholarship shows many Indian monks and nuns continued family connections post-ordination, as demonstrated by Gregory Schopen's inscriptional evidence, indicating they often made donations for their families' benefit.

How has renunciation been redefined in contemporary Buddhist studies?add

New perspectives highlight renunciation in Buddhism as not necessarily severing family ties, instead showing it can involve creating supportive monastic 'families' and maintaining ties with biological families.

What role do fictive kinship ties play in Buddhist communities?add

Fictive kinship ties help structure monastic life, fostering a sense of belonging and obligation among monastics, with claims of being 'children of the Buddha' enhancing their communal identity.

How do familial practices impact monastic recruitment in Theravāda Buddhism?add

Temporary ordination traditions in Theravāda communities illustrate how families support monastic recruitment to generate merit and maintain social ties, as shown in Charles Keyes' 1986 analysis.

What insights do Buddhist texts provide about parental roles?add

Texts like the Gotamī Apadāna reveal the significance of maternal figures in Buddhism, reflecting on the debts children owe to mothers, which informs monastic authority and familial obligations.

Related papers

Family Ties & Buddhist Nuns in Tang China
Buddhist Sociology (Author: Nandasena Ratnapala)

Based primarily on Pali sources, this book deals with Topics like family, socialization, social institutions, social structure, Women in Buddhist society, etc. Contents: Preface 1. Introduction 2. The Methodology in Buddhist Thought 3. Family 4. Socialization 5. Social Stratification 6. Woman and Society 7. A Political Theory in the Buddhist Tradition? 8. Buddhist Economics 9. Buddhism and Education 10. Crime and Social Control 11. Violence, Terrorism and Buddhism 12. Alcohol and Intoxicants 13. Buddhist Philosophy of Health

CHEN HAILIANG'S VISION OF BUDDHIST FAMILY LIFE: A PRELIMINARY STUDY

Journal of Chinese Religions, 2019

This paper attempts to provide an overview of how modern Chinese Buddhists worked to blend self-cultivation and family life, with a focus on the ideal of the "Buddhicized family" (Fohua jiating 佛化家庭) as expressed in the writings of the lay Buddhist elite Chen Hailiang 陳海量 (1910-1983), which provided spiritual and material advice for readers striving to achieve equilibrium between religious requirements and social norms. Due to his extensive work with young Buddhist men and women who were seeking spouses, getting married, and starting their own families, Chen's works paid close attention to issues of gender and sexuality, including childbirth, menstruation, masturbation, etc. Chen's vision of modern Buddhist family life sheds light on significant processes of change taking place in the early twentieth century, with that religion's urban elites seeking to define their approach to Buddhism in such a way that both maintained their commitment to social activism yet established the basis for a rich religious life. The data below highlight the complexity of Buddhist thought during the modern era, the interaction between religious discourses and others circulating at that time, and the continuing relevance of these issues in present-day Chinese societies around the world.

Vajra Brother, Vajra Sister: Renunciation, Individualism and the Household in Tibetan Buddhist Monasticism. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Vol. 6, No. 1. (Mar., 2000), pp. 17-34.

This article challenges two connected notions in the study of Tibetan Buddhism: that Buddhist monasticism is characterized by a pronounced move towards individualism, systematically detaching monks from relational social life; and that Tibetan Buddhist doctrines of karma represent an alternative mode of identity to those constructed within household life. By comparing the ritual practices and inheritance patterns associated with household groups in Ladakh with tantric ritual forms in local Buddhist (Gelukpa) monasteries, it is argued that they demonstrate pronounced structural similarities, centred on the shared symbolic construct of the household/temple as the source of socialized agency. An analysis of the meditative disciplines of Gelukpa monasticism is used to show how such training serves not to renounce kinship and household values, but to transform them into modes of religious authority, essential to the social position of monks (trapa) and incarnate lamas (tulku) in Tibetan Buddhism.

HUMAN BEHAVIORS IN PROMOTING BALANCE OF FAMILY ACCORDING TO BUDDHIST PSYCHOLOGY

Buddhist Research Institute: Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University Press, 2017

This qualitative research consists of two objectives, namely:- 1) To examine the concept of balance of family in Buddhism and the theory of family behavior in Psychology, and 2) To suggest human behaviors in promoting balance of Family according to Buddhist Psychology. The data collections together with the in-depth interviews were carried out with 10 key-informants from 5 countries with the Item-Objective Congruence (IOC) examined by 3 experts. The findings show that balance of family implies a group of persons who live together in relationships consisting either of spouse or parents and child. Family members adopt a similar pattern of Buddhist virtuous behavior existing in equal and mutually beneficial amounts that resulting in a balance relationship. Firstly, SPOUSE Family members need to have qualities as stated in gharavāsa-dhamma, equitable as in samajīvidhamma and self-responsibilities according to Sīgālovāda Sutta as well as living together as deity spouse instead of ghost. Secondly, PARENTS AND CHILDREN Family members should reciprocally practice filial piety (kataññūkataveditā) and self-responsibilities as in Sīgālovāda Sutta. They must also maintain the family wealth. However, both Family Systems Theory and Planned Behavior Theory (PBT) in psychology described systems, structure, relationships, beliefs, behaviors and equilibrium of the family. The fourfold human behavior in promoting balance of Family according to Buddhist Psychology signifies 1) Virtuous Behavior, 2) Responsible Behavior, 3) Reciprocal Behavior, and 4) Supportive Behavior respectively.

A Heap of Leaves or Fellow Travellers. Kinship and Family Life in the Buddhist Texts for the Buryat Laity (Nineteenth to Early Twentieth Centuries)

Inner Asia, 2022

Much has been written about the role of ‘shamanism’ in the making of Mongol kinship. This article aims to explore the role of Buddhism in constructing kinship, which has received less scholarly attention. In particular, I investigate the ways the ‘anti-family’ orientation of Buddhism was propagated in Buryat society, which had assigned great social importance to kinship networks. In didactic texts compiled by Buryat lamas for the laity in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, lamas argued that, despite the impermanent character of kinship, kinship bonds nevertheless were to be arranged in a proper way to avoid multiplying sins. However, lamas did not offer a ready model or a special Buddhist ideal of the family organisation. Like in other regional contexts, Buddhist ethics were adapted to the existing cultural traditions and mostly emphasised proper roles and responsibilities in conjugal and parent-child relationships.

Buddhist monasticism and contemporary trends:from the viewpoint of Buddhist women and Buddhist nuns

2015

As secularization and global consumerism corrodes the traditional monastic ideals and an ethical way of life, the concept of Buddhist monasticism as well as the roles of monastic members are undergoing review in the world today. This essay examines how Buddhist monasticism has changed in its engagement with modernity and postmodernity, and what relevance some of its modern adaptation has had especially on female monastic members who find meaning in their monastic way of life. To start with, I offer a brief background to understand the implication of Buddhist monasticism in modern times and examine whether the very foundation of its institution has changed or adapted in certain areas to accommodate modern demands while keeping its basic principles intact.

Buddhist teen bowing to parents: straddling the border between private and public religion

2016

Bowing to parents is a Buddhist home practice that links with the spread of religious-led attitudes across a notional border into the public sphere of young Buddhists’ lives. A quantitative study sought to map the attitudes corresponding with bowing to parents for teen self-identifying Buddhists in Britain. A variety of statements including those concerning personal well-being, discrimination, work, school, Religious Education, friends, family, substance use, collectivism, tradition and religion were rated for levels of agreement by 417 self-identifying Buddhists, aged between 13 and 20, using postal and online surveys. The 56% who bowed to parents were found to have stronger public-sphere attitudes such as work ethic, resilience to intoxicant use, valuing study and Religious Education. In the private sphere, they were found to have a more positive attitude towards family and Buddhism. Additionally the study found the significance of bowing differed with age – being linked particularly with an increased subjective well-being in early teens and acceptance of hierarchy and parental influence in late teens. Also, the attitudes corresponding with bowing depended on religious style – bowing being linked with Asian values and feeling more religious for convert Buddhist teens, whereas for heritage Buddhist teens it was linked more with ingroup mentality. Unlike non-Buddhist adolescents, bowing to parents in Buddhists was linked with wanting to look after parents in old age. The article argues that bowing to parents has the cultural function of bringing religiously-led good into society, acting as a perpetuating structure, binding the Buddhist community together, facilitating mutual respect from adults and a sense of social hierarchy and as such deserves to be considered an aspect of Buddhist religiosity.

The Teaching and Practice of Filial Piety in Buddhism

Buddhist scholars like Kenneth Ch’en have argued that the teaching of filial piety was a special feature of Chinese Buddhism as a response to the Chinese culture. Others, among them John Strong and Gregory Schopen, have shown that filial piety was also important in Indian Buddhism, Strong does not consider it integral to the belief system and Schopen did not find evidence of it in early writings he examined. In this article, through an analysis of early Buddhist resources, the Nikāyas and Āgamas, I demonstrate that the practice of filial piety has been the chief good karma in the Buddhist moral teaching since its inception, although it is not as foundational for Buddhist ethics as it is for Confucian ethics. The Buddha advised people to honor parents as the Brahmā, the supreme god and the creator of human beings in Hinduism, as parents have done much for their children. Hence, Buddhism teaches its followers to pay their debts to parents by supporting and respecting them, actions that are considered the first of all meritorious deeds, or good karma, in Buddhist moral teachings. Moreover, according to the Buddhist teaching of karma, matricide and patricide are considered two of the five gravest bad deeds, and the consequence is immediate rebirth in hell. Mahāyāna Buddhism developed the idea of filial piety further and formulated the four debts to four groups of people—parents, sentient beings, rulers, and Buddhism—a teaching that became very popular in Chinese Buddhism and spread to other East Asian countries.

THE FAMILY FUNCTION IN THE MODERN SOCIETY (ACCORDING TO THE THEORY OF FUNCTIONALISM AND BUDDHIST TEACHING
Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (38)

  1. Andaya, B. W. (2002). Localising the Universal: Women, Motherhood and the Appeal of Early Theravada Buddhism, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 33(1), pp. 1-30.
  2. Bechert, H. (1966). Buddhismus Staat und gesellschaft in den Laendern des Theravada Buddhismus, vol. 1. Frankfurt and Berlin: Alfred Metzner Verlag.
  3. Brown, S. (2001). The Journey of One Buddhist Nun: Even Against the Wind. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  4. Chalmers, R., et al. (trans.). (1895-1907). The Jātaka or Stories of the Buddha's Former Births, 6 vols. London: Pali Text Society, (reprinted in 3 vols., 1973) 6:38-52.
  5. Ch'en, K. (1968). Filial Piety in Chinese Buddhism, Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 28, pp. 81-97.
  6. Clarke, S. (2006). Family Matters in Indian Monastic Buddhism. Ph.D. dissertation. The University of California-Los Angeles.
  7. --. (2009). Monks Who Have Sex: Pārājika Penance in Indian Buddhist Monasticisms, Journal of Indian Philosophy, 37, pp. 1-43.
  8. --. (2014). Family Matters in Indian Buddhist Monasticisms. Honolulu, Hawai'i: University of Hawai'i Press.
  9. Cohen, R. (2000). Śākyabhik us and the Institutionalization of the Bodhisattva Ideal, History of Religions, 40(1), pp. 1-31.
  10. Cole, A. (1998). Mothers and Sons in Chinese Buddhism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  11. --. (2005). Text as Father: Paternal Seductions in Early Mahāyāna Buddhist Literature. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  12. Covell, S. G. (2006). Japanese Temple Buddhism: Worldliness in a Religion of Renunciation. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
  13. Evers, H. (1967). Kinship and Property Rights in a Buddhist Monastery in Central Ceylon, American Anthropologist, New Series, 69, pp. 703-10.
  14. --.(1969). Monastic Landlordism in Ceylon: A Traditional System in a Modern Setting, Journal of Asian Studies, 28(4), pp. 685-92.
  15. Faure, B. (1998). The Red Thread: Buddhist Approaches to Sexuality. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  16. --. (2003). The Power of Denial: Buddhism, Purity, and Gender. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  17. Gombrich, R. (1972). Feminine Elements in Sinhalese Buddhism, Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens, 16, pp. 67-93.
  18. --.(1984). Temporary Ordination in Sri Lanka, Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, 7(2), pp. 41-65.
  19. Keyes, C. F. (1986). Ambiguous Gender: Male Initiation in a Northern Thai Buddhist Society. In: Caroline Walker Bynum, Stevan Harrell and Paula Richman (eds.), Gender and Religion: On the Complexity of Symbols, pp. 66-96. Boston: Beacon Press.
  20. Miller, M. (2000). Vajra Brother, Vajra Sister: Renunciation, Individualism, and the Household in Tibetan Buddhist Monasticism, The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 6(1), pp. 17-34.
  21. Mus, P. (1978). Barabudur: Esquise d'une histoire du Bouddhisme fondée sur la critique archéologique des texts, 2 vols. Hanoi: Ecole Française d'Extreme Orient, 1935; New York: Arno Press.
  22. Norman, K. R. (transl.). (1995). The Group of Discourses (Sutta-nipāta), Vol. 2: Revised Translation and Introduction and Notes. Oxford: Pali Text Society.
  23. Ohnuma, R. (2006). "Debt to the Mother: A Neglected Aspect of the Founding of the Buddhist Nuns' Order," Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 74(4), pp. 861-901.
  24. --. (2012). Ties That Bind: Maternal Imagery and Discourse in Indian Buddhism. New York: Oxford University Press.
  25. Oldenberg, H. (ed.) (1879-1883). Vinaya Pitaka, 5 vols. London: Pali Text Society.
  26. Samuels, J. (2010). Attracting the Heart: Social Relations and the Aesthetics of Emotion in Sri Lankan Monastic Culture. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
  27. Sasson, V. R. (ed.) (2013). Little Buddhas: Children and Childhoods in Buddhist Texts and Traditions. New York: Oxford University Press.
  28. Schopen, G. (1995). Monastic Law Meets the Real World: A Monk's Continuing Right to Inherit Family Property in Classical India, History of Religions, 35, pp. 101-23.
  29. --. (1997). Filial Piety and the Monk in the Practice of Indian Buddhism: A Question of 'Sinicization' Viewed from the Other Side. In: Schopen G (ed), Bones, Stones, and Buddhist Monks: Collected Papers on the Archaeology, Epigraphy and Texts of Monastic Buddhism in India, pp. 56-71. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
  30. Senart, É. (ed.) (1882-1897). Mahāvastu Avadāna . Le Mahāvastu: texte sanscrit publié pour le premier fois et accompagné d'introductions et d'un commentaire, 3 vols. Paris: Société Asiatique.
  31. Strong, J. S. (1983a). Filial Piety and Buddhism: The Indian Antecedents to a 'Chinese' Problem. In: Peter Slater and Donald Wiebe (eds.), Traditions in Contact and Change, pp. 171-86. Waterloo, Ontario: Wilfred Laurier University Press.
  32. --. (1983b). The Legend of King Aśoka: A Study and Translation of the Aśokāvadāna. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  33. Swearer, D. (1995). The Buddhist World of Southeast Asia. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  34. Teiser, S. F. (1988). The Ghost Festival in Medieval China. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  35. Walshe, M. (trans.). (1995). The Long Discourses of the Buddha: A Translation of the Digha Nikāya. Boston: Wisdom; Dīgha Nikāya, T. W. Rhys Davids and J. E. Carpenter (eds), (1889-1910), 3 vols. London: Pali Text Society.
  36. Walters, J. S. (1994). A Voice From the Silence: The Buddha's Mother's Story, History of Religions, 33(4), pp. 358-79.
  37. --. (transl.). (1995). Gotamī's Story. In: Donald S. Lopez, Jr. (ed.), Buddhism in Practice, pp. 113-38. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  38. Wheeler, W. (2000). How a Buddhist Decides Whether or Not to Have Children. In: Ellison Banks Findly (ed.), Women's Buddhism, Buddhism's Women: Tradition, Revision, Renewal, pp. 405-434. Boston: Wisdom Publications.

Related papers

"Buddhism and Family" published in Journal: Religion Compass (Electronic) 8/6 (July 2014

Abstract The received wisdom about Buddhism depicts it as an otherworldly religion that values the solitary monk or nun and devalues family life and the social world in general. Recent scholarship, however, reveals evidence that this picture is seriously flawed. Yes, there are many seminal Buddhist texts that suggest that monastics should destroy familial ties to whatever extent is possible. But there are many other texts, as well as inscriptions and other forms of material culture such as art and architecture that indicate that in both the past and the present, Buddhist monks and nuns have remained embedded in family life in ways that might surprise us. Moreover, many Buddhist institutions have been modeled on the family and rely on familial loyalties for their strength and endurance. Familial ties have shaped the expression of Buddhism in every Buddhist society, structuring Buddhist institutions and providing a fundamental language and form of practice.

Review of Family Matters in Indian Buddhist Monasticisms by Shayne Neil Clarke

IJAS, 2016

Introduction: Tensions Between Families and Religious Institutions

t has been well noted at this point that Buddhist studies has suffered from a disproportionate emphasis on its idealized ascetic representations. Family life has, as a result, been marginalized (if not entirely ignored).

Preserving Family Cohesiveness In Compliance With Buddhist Teachings

icundv.com

Book review: Family Matters in Indian Buddhist Monasticisms, by Shayne Clarke

Review of Shayne Clarke’s Family Matters in Indian Buddhist Monasticism (Hawai’i University Press 2014). South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 2017, 40/1: 211-213. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00856401.2017.1279727?scroll=top&needAccess=true

Being Buddhist in the XXI Century Society. A Sociological Analysis of Buddhist People Social Values and Attitudes

Buddhism for Sustainable Development and Social Change. , 2014

The Attitudes of Buddhist teenagers from 'broken' families in Britain

This presentation explores the attitudes, religiosity, self-esteem and Psychological Type Buddhist teens in Britain have experienced in correspondence with going through a parental divorce. A quantitative study compared attitudes of teens with divorced parents with those from intact families. A variety of attitude statements concerning school, RE, family, friends and religion were rated for levels of agreement by 413 self-identifying Buddhists aged between 13 and 20. Buddhists were found to have an average divorce rate lower (31%) than the average divorce rate in Britain (42%), although divorce rate for Buddhists from heritage families was much lower (18%) and for converts higher (51%) than the average. Buddhists from 'broken' families were generally less positive in their attitudes towards school & authority and had lower self-esteem. Any upside of divorce came in the form of motivation to ordain (for late teens), more sense of empowerment to solve problems in the world, increased spirituality and less reliance on the internet and TV. Divorce in Buddhists did not damage affective religiosity or attitude to RE, even for low income families, but changed the manner of religious engagement from the Psychological Type preference of Judging (J) to Perceiving (P)-which is reflected in certain attitudes to authority and morality. This is different from findings in Christianity where disillusionment with church followed divorce. The paper reflects how RE teachers might rekindle interest in religion for teens left disillusioned by divorce and to leverage adversity to stimulate them to become more spiritually reflexive and mature.

Buddhism and Children
Actualizing Buddhanature with the Internal Family Systems Model

The relationship between Buddhist psychology and the Internal Family Systems (IFS) therapeutic model is notable. Both assert that what we commonly think of as our 'self' is actually an aggregate of myriad parts acting from unmet desires, fears, and delusions. Both also maintain the possibility of actualizing a healthier, wiser, more compassionate 'self' by changing how we understand and relate to these internal parts. What may not be so apparent at first glance, is how the IFS notion of 'Self,' with a capital 'S,' reconciles with the Buddhist notion of non-self or anatta. Rather than being contradictory, Dr. Flint Sparks, psychotherapist and Zen priest, holds they are one and the same, and the Buddhist point of view brings a more nuanced approach to Self that IFS accommodates. 1

[418-13]. Singh, Rana P.B. 2013. The Hindu Family in Indian Society: Perspectives and Prospects; in, Angellio, Maria (ed.) The Family in the Cultures and Societies of Asia. Asiatica Ambrosiana [Roma], nr. 5: pp. 19 - 48. ISBN 978-88-7870-888-4.

Like in other cultures, the Hindu family also represents a social institution that developed in passage of time and has always been practiced as a core element in the development and maintenance of the value and ethics systems and lifeways for an individual as well as for the close clan and castes and altogether in making the societal world that further influence the state and nation. That is how the changes in family structure and its values are given much attention for understanding social scenario and state of development. In fact, the development of an individual, society, and state very much depends on the family and related lifeways and inherent life philosophy. The structure and function of the family is not any more traditional product of cultural history but it also indicates changing and shifting relation to wider niches of social and economic developments. Of course, the family is the foundational institution in societies ― an institution which is a frame or gaze of identity, emotion, cultural expression, care, despair, reproductive labour, systemic and systematic violence, repression, and domination in ways that other institutions are not. Moreover, it is foundational where constantly run contestations over life and culture. In India the position of family, especially of Hindus, has been central and critical. The family performs important task which contribute to society’s basic needs and helps to perpetuate social order. Family is also described as “a group of persons directly linked by kin connections, the adult members of assume responsibility for caring for children”.

Related topics

  • Family studies
  • Academia
    Academia
    580 California St., Suite 400
    San Francisco, CA, 94104
    © 2025 Academia. All rights reserved

    [8]ページ先頭

    ©2009-2025 Movatter.jp