Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Theropod dinosaurs from the Late Jurassic of Tendaguru, Tanzania

Profile image of Oliver RauhutOliver Rauhut

2005

https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1475-4983.2011.01084.X
visibility

description

45 pages

Sign up for access to the world's latest research

checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact

Abstract

The Tendaguru Formation of south-eastern Tanzania has yielded the only diverse theropod fauna known from the Late Jurassic of Gondwana. Theropod remains have been recovered mainly from two members of the formation, the Middle and Upper Dinosaur members, which span from the Kimmeridgian to the latest Tithonian or earliest Cretaceous. Here, four of the described taxa and additional isolated remains from this formation are reviewed and evaluated. Labrosaurus(?) stechowi Janensch, and Megalosaurus(?) ingens Janensch, are based on isolated teeth that do not show any unique derived characters, so these taxa are regarded as nomina dubia. Nevertheless, the teeth show character combinations indicative of ceratosaurid and carcharodontosaurid relationships, respectively. Ceratosaurus? roechlingi Janensch was based on associated fragmentary remains, which probably represent more than a single taxon. None of the type material shows diagnostic characters, so the species is a nomen dubium, and a middle caudal vertebra with possibly ceratosaurid affinities is designated as the lectotype. Allosaurus(?) tendgurensis Janensch is based on an isolated, poorly preserved basal tetanuran tibia, which cannot be diagnosed, so the species is also a nomen dubium. A new taxon, Veterupristisaurus milneri gen. et sp. nov., is based on diagnostic caudal vertebrae from the Middle Dinosaur Member. These elements show carcharodontosaurid synapomorphies and, within this clade, share a unique derived character with the genus Acrocanthosaurus. In total, theropod material from the Tendaguru Formation indicates the presence of at least seven different species of theropods, including the ceratosaurian Elaphrosaurus bambergi Janensch, a probable ceratosaurid, a small abelisauroid, a probable abelisaurid, a small, noncoelurosaurian tetanuran, a possible megalosauroid and a carcharodontosaurid. Theropod faunas from the Middle and Upper Dinosaur members might differ slightly, but are similar in general taxonomic composition. In broad systematic terms, the theropod fauna from Tendaguru shows greater similarities to Cretaceous Gondwanan theropod faunas than with contemporaneous fauna from the North American Morrison Formation, indicating that the complex evolutionary and biogeographical history of Cretaceous Gondwanan theropod faunas can only be understood in the light of their Jurassic origins.

Key takeaways
sparkles

AI

  1. The Tendaguru Formation harbors the only diverse Late Jurassic theropod fauna from Gondwana.
  2. At least seven theropod taxa exist, including ceratosaurids and basal tetanurans.
  3. Veterupristisaurus milneri represents a new carcharodontosaurid taxon from the Middle Dinosaur Member.
  4. Taxonomic composition indicates greater similarities with Cretaceous Gondwanan theropods than those from North America.
  5. Carcharodontosaurids and abelisauroids signal distinct evolutionary paths in Southern Hemisphere theropod diversity.

Related papers

Phylogenetic relationships of the Cretaceous Gondwanan theropods Megaraptor and Australovenator: the evidence afforded by their manual anatomy

Memoirs of Museum Victoria, 2016

Novas, F.E., Aranciaga Rolando, A.M. and Agnolín, F.L. 2016. Phylogenetic relationships of the Cretaceous Gondwanan theropods Megaraptor and Australovenator: the evidence afforded by their manual anatomy. Memoirs of Museum Victoria 74: 49-61. General comparisons of the manual elements of megaraptorid theropods are conducted with the aim to enlarge the morphological dataset of phylogenetically useful features within Tetanurae. Distinctive features of Megaraptor are concentrated along the medial side of the manus, with metacarpal I and its corresponding digit being considerably elongated. Manual ungual of digit I is characteristically enlarged in megaraptorids, but it is also transversely compressed resulting in a sharp ventral edge. We recognize two derived characters shared by megaraptorans and coelurosaurs (i.e., proximal end of metacarpal I without a deep and wide groove continuous with the semilunar carpal, and metacarpals I and II long and slender), and one derived trait similar to derived tyrannosauroids (i.e., metacarpal III length <0.75 length of metacarpal II). However, after comparing carpal, metacarpal and phalangeal morphologies, it becomes evident that megaraptorids retained most of the manual features present in Allosaurus. Moreover, Megaraptor and Australovenator are devoid of several manual features that the basal tyrannosauroid Guanlong shares with more derived coelurosaurs (e.g., Deinonychus), thus countering our own previous hypothesis that Megaraptora is well nested within Tyrannosauroidea.

Note on the paleobiogeography of Compsognathidae (Dinosauria: Theropoda) and its paleoecological implications

The paleobiogeography of the theropod clade Compsognathidae is here reaccessed in order to test the hypothesis of this taxon being adapted specifically to inhabit semi-arid environments. Data about localities where these fossils were collected and their paleoenvironments were gathered from the literature. Compsognathids seem to be found especially in sedimentary deposits known as Fossil Lagerstätten, which were formed under a set of specific conditions that allowed the preservation of the fragile bone remains of these animals. This bias limits an accurate analysis of the historical and/or ecological paleobiogeography of this taxon. Actually, it is possible that compsognathids had an almost worldwide distribution during the Mesozoic Era. Their occurrence in Lower Cretaceous rocks of China suggests that they also inhabited environments with moist conditions instead of being restricted to semi-arid to arid environments.

First description of theropod remains from the Middle Jurassic (Bathonian) of Madagascar

Atti della Società italiana di scienze …, 2005

New theropod remains from the Middle Jurassic (Bathonian) of NW Madagascar are described that include 49 isolated teeth and a dorsal vertebra. Being referable to at least three taxa, they provide a first insight into the high morphological biodiversity in the Middle Jurassic theropods. They may represent the oldest Gondwanan material referable to the Abelisauridae and Coelurosauria found up to today; however, lacking more exhaustive data on theropod dentition, their affinities remain uncertain pending more complete material.

Paleobiology and geographic range of the large-bodied Cretaceous theropod dinosaur Acrocanthosaurus atokensis

A partial theropod skeleton from the Albian (ca. 105 ma) Cloverly Formation of Wyoming is shown to exhibit many features in common with members of Carcharodontosauria and is referred to Acrocanthosaurus atokensis on the basis of an autapomorphy and a unique combination of characters. The absence of neurocentral fusion in dorsal and caudal vertebrae and bone histology of the femur indicate that the specimen is a juvenile. The circumferences of lines of arrested growth were used to estimate mass over successive years of the animal's life. These mass estimates suggest that early in ontogeny, Acrocanthosaurus grew at rates on par with growth rates inferred in Allosaurus and most tyrannosaurid theropods, which are similar to rates expected for scaledup precocial birds. Histological data from adult specimens suggest that Acrocanthosaurus reached adult body size in two to three decades. Gigantism in Acrocanthosaurus likely evolved via acceleration of growth rates relative to those of basal members of Allosauroidea, a transition also observed within tyrannosauroid theropods. Contrary to previous assessments, there is only evidence for one large-bodied theropod species in the Early Cretaceous of North America, though many fragmentary specimens are indeterminate to the genus level. Aptian-Albian and Maastrichtian-aged dinosaur communities were more similar to one another than to those of the intervening Campanian stage in that both seem to have featured a single, extremely large-bodied, fast growing, geographically widespread theropod dinosaur.

A late-surviving basal theropod dinosaur from the latest Triassic of North America

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2011

The oldest theropod dinosaurs are known from the Carnian of Argentina and Brazil. However, the evolutionary diversification of this group after its initial radiation but prior to the Triassic -Jurassic boundary is still poorly understood because of a sparse fossil record near that boundary. Here, we report on a new basal theropod, Daemonosaurus chauliodus gen. et sp. nov., from the latest Triassic 'siltstone member' of the Chinle Formation of the Coelophysis Quarry at Ghost Ranch, New Mexico. Based on a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis, Daemonosaurus is more closely related to coeval neotheropods (e.g. Coelophysis bauri) than to Herrerasauridae and Eoraptor. The skeletal structure of Daemonosaurus and the recently discovered Tawa bridge a morphological gap between Eoraptor and Herrerasauridae on one hand and neotheropods on the other, providing additional support for the theropod affinities of both Eoraptor and Herrerasauridae and demonstrating that lineages from the initial radiation of Dinosauria persisted until the end of the Triassic. Various features of the skull of Daemonosaurus, including the procumbent dentary and premaxillary teeth and greatly enlarged premaxillary and anterior maxillary teeth, clearly set this taxon apart from coeval neotheropods and demonstrate unexpected disparity in cranial shape among theropod dinosaurs just prior to the end of the Triassic.

The caudal vertebral series in Abelisauridae (Dinosauria: Theropoda)

Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 2012

The cervical vertebral series of Carnotaurus sastrei from Argentina is described in detail, and compared with Majungasaurus crenatissimus from Madagascar, both Late Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) in age. Notable differences in the morphology of the cervical vertebrae, especially in the shape and development of the epipophysis and the neural spines, are observed between these two genera. These differences show a neck much more robust in Carnotaurus than in Majungasaurus, may be linked to the evolution of the clade in relation to the divergence time since the two genera shared a common ancestor, and functionally may relate to the feeding function associated to the extreme reduction of the forelimbs.

A Second Gondwanan Diplodocid Dinosaur from the Upper Jurassic Tendaguru Beds of Tanzania, East Africa

2007

A new genus and species of diplodocid sauropod (Sauropoda, Diplodocoidea), Australodocus bohetii, is described. The type material from the Upper Jurassic (Tithonian) Tendaguru Beds of Tanzania, East Africa, consists of two successive mid-cervical vertebrae. These vertebrae do not show the extreme elongation of the cervical vertebrae that is diagnostic for Tornieria, and, apart from proportional differences, exhibit four autapomorphic characters not seen in other diplodocids: (1) pleurocoel weakly developed; (2) ridge posterolateral to the anterior condyle strongly posteroventrally orientated; (3) triangular pneumatic cavity ventral to the prezygapophysis, enclosed by the lateral ramus of the centroprezygapophyseal lamina and an anteriorly extended prezygodiapophyseal lamina; and (4) prominent prezygapophyseal process pointed, laterally keeled and surpassing the prezygapophysis anteriorly. Australodocus bohetii is the second diplodocid known from Tendaguru, and thereby the second diplodocid known from Gondwana. This impedes the customary reference of isolated East African diplodocid material to Tornieria, which can now only be assigned to Diplodocidae indet. The find supports previously proposed vicariance models of diplodocid palaeobiogeography.

Osteology and phylogenetic relationships of Tyrannotitan chubutensis Novas, de Valais, Vickers- Rich and Rich, 2005 (Theropoda: Carcharodontosauridae) from the Lower Cretaceous of Patagonia, Argentina

2013

The theropod clade Carcharodontosauridae is a broadly distributed group of large allosauroid theropods. The carcharodontosaurids recorded in the Albian – Cenomanian of Gondwana are the youngest and most derived members of this clade. Tyrannotitan chubutensis, from the Cerro Castan˜ o Member of Cerro Barcino Formation (Albian; Chubut Group), Central Patagonia, Argentina, is of prime interest among Gondwanan carcharodontosaurids as it represents the oldest record of the group. Here we offer a detailed osteological comparative description of the holotype and paratype of Tyrannotitan chubutensis together with a new diagnosis of the species. The new information results in a better understanding of this taxon and Carcharodontosauridae. Furthermore, a comparative study of the anatomy of the pectoral girdle of Giganotosaurus is reinterpreted as very similar to that of Tyrannotitan and Mapusaurus. We also present a phylogenetic analysis of Carcharodontosauridae that recovers Tyrannotitan as a derived carcharodontosaurid, being the sister group of the clade formed by Giganotosaurus and Mapusaurus, all nested in the clade Giganotosaurini

Fossils explained 27: Theropod dinosaurs

Geology Today, 2001

Systematic palaeontology Dinosauria Owen , 1842 Saurischia Seeley , 1888 Theropoda Marsh , 1881 Theropoda indet

2015

The dinosaur record in the South Pyrenees Basin is diverse and rich. A total of 142 theropod teeth were studied for this paper, which constitutes one of the richest samples for these remains in Europe. Eight upper Campanian to upper Maastrichtian outcrops from the Pyrenees produced six non-avian theropod taxa (Theropoda indet., Coelurosauria indet., ?Richardoestesia, ?Dromaeosauridae indet., ?Pyroraptor olympius, ?Paronychodon). These six taxa are added to two previously described theropods (a Richardoestesia-like form and a possible ornithomimosaurid), indicating that there was considerable theropod diversity on the Iberian Peninsula during the Late Cretaceous.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (118)

  1. A B E R H A N , M., B U S S E R T , R., H E I N R I C H , W.-D., S C H - R A N K , E., S C H U L T K A , S., S A M E S , B., K R I W E T , J. and K A P I L I M A , S. 2002. Palaeoecology and depositional environments of the Tendaguru Beds (Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous, Tanzania). Mitteilungen aus dem Museum fu ¨r Naturkunde Berlin, Geowissenschaftliche Reihe, 5, 19-44.
  2. A C C A R I E , H., B E A U D O I N , B., D E J A X , J., F R I E `S , G., M I C H A R D , J.-G. and T A Q U E T , P. 1995. De ´couverte d'un Dinosaure The ´ropode nouveau (Genusaurus sisteronis n. g., n. sp.) dans l'Albien marin de Sisteron (Alpes de Haute-Prov- ence, France) et extension au Cre ´tace ´infe ´rieur de la ligne ´e ce ´ratosaurien. Comptes Rendus de l'Acade ´mie des Sciences de Paris, Se ´ries II, 320, 327-334.
  3. A G N O L I N , F. L. and M A R T I N E L L I , A. G. 2007. Did oviraptorosaurs (Dinosauria; Theropoda) inhabit Argentina? Cretaceous Research, 28, 785-790.
  4. --E Z C U R R A , M. D., P A I S , D. F. and S A L I S B U R Y , S. W. 2010. A reappraisal of the Cretaceous non-avian dinosaur faunas from Australia and New Zealand: evidence for their Gondwanan affinities. Journal of Systematic Palaeon- tology, 8, 257-300.
  5. A L L A I N , R., T Y K O S K I , R. S., A Q U E S B I , N., J A L I L , N.-E., M O N B A R O N , M., R U S S E L L , D. A. and T A Q U E T , P. 2007. An abelisauroid (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from the Early Jurassic of the High Atlas Mountains, Mor- occo, and the radiation of ceratosaurs. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 27, 610-624.
  6. A Z U M A , Y. and C U R R I E , P. J. 2000. A new carnosaur (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from the Lower Cretaceous of Japan. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 37, 1735-1753.
  7. B A K K E R , R. T., S I E G W A R T H , J., K R A L I S , D. and F I L - L A , J. 1992. Edmarka rex, a new, gigantic theropod dinosaur from the middle Morrison Formation, Late Jurassic of the Como Bluff outcrop region. Hunteria, 2, 1-24.
  8. B A R R E T T , P. M., K E A R , B. P. and B E N S O N , R. B. J. 2010. Opalized archosaur remains from the Bulldog Shale (Aptian: Lower Cretaceous) of South Australia. Alcheringa, 34, 293- 301.
  9. B E N S O N , R. B. J. 2008. New information on Stokesosaurus, a tyrannosauroid (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from North America H E N N I G , E. 1925. Kentrurosaurus aethiopicus. Die Stegosauri- er-Funde vom Tendaguru, Deutsch-Ostafrika. Palaeontograph- ica, Supplement 7, 1, 103-253.
  10. H E R N E , M. C., N A I R , J. P. and S A L I S B U R Y , S. W. 2010. Comment on 'a southern tyrant reptile'. Science, 329, 1013A.
  11. H O C K N U L L , S. A., W H I T E , M. A., T I S C H L E R , T. R., C O O K , A. G., C A L L E J A , N. D., S L O A N , T. and E L L I - O T T , D. A. 2009. New Mid-Cretaceous (Latest Albian) dino- saurs from Winton, Queensland, Australia. PLoS ONE, 4, 1-51.
  12. H O N E , D. W. E., X U X IN G and W A N G D E-YO U 2010. A probable baryonychine (Theropoda: Spinosauroidae) tooth from the Upper Cretaceous of Henan Province, China. Verte- brata PalAsiatica, 48, 19-26.
  13. H U ¨B N E R , T. and R A U H U T , O. W. M. 2010. A juvenile skull of Dysalotosaurus lettowvorbecki (Ornithischia: Iguanodontia) and implications for cranial ontogeny, phylogeny and taxon- omy in ornithopod dinosaurs. Zoological Journal of the Lin- nean Society, 160, 366-396.
  14. H U T C H I N S O N , J. R. 2001. The evolution of pelvic osteology and soft tissues on the line to extant birds (Neornithes). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 131, 123-168.
  15. H U T T , S., M A R T I L L , D. M. and B A R K E R , M. J. 1996. The first European allosaurid (Lower Cretaceous, Wealden Group, England). Neues Jahrbuch fu ¨r Geologie und Pala ¨ontologie, Monatshefte, 1996, 635-644.
  16. --N A I S H , D., M A R T I L L , D. M., B A R K E R , M. J. and N E W B E R R Y , P. 2001. A preliminary account of a new tyrannosauroid theropod from the Wessex Formation (Early Cretaceous) of southern England. Cretaceous Research, 22, 227-242.
  17. INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION OF ZOOLOGICAL NO M EN C LAT U RE (1999). International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. International Trust for Zoological Nomencla- ture, London, 306 pp.
  18. I R M I S , R. B. 2007. Axial skeleton ontogeny in the Parasuchia (Archosauria: Pseudosuchia) and its implications for ontoge- netic determination in archosaurs. Journal of Vertebrate Pale- ontology, 27, 350-361.
  19. J A N E N S C H , W. 1914. U ¨bersicht u ¨ber die Wirbeltierfauna der Tendaguruschichten, nebst einer kurzen Charakterisierung der neu aufgefu ¨hrten Arten von Sauropoden. Archiv fu ¨r Biontolo- gie, 3, 81-110.
  20. --1920. Ueber Elaphrosaurus bambergi und die Megalosaurier aus den Tendaguru-Schichten Deutsch-Ostafrikas. Sitzungsberichte der Gesellschaft naturforschender Freunde zu Berlin, 1920, 225-235.
  21. --1925a. Die Coelurosaurier und Theropoden der Tendag- uru-Schichten Deutsch-Ostafrikas. Palaeontographica, Supple- ment 7, 1, 1-99.
  22. --1925b. Die Grabungsstellen der Tendaguru-Gegend. Palae- ontographica, Supplement 7, 1, 17-19.
  23. --1929a. Ein aufgestelltes und rekonstruiertes Skelett von Elaphrosaurus bambergi. Mit einem Nachtrag zur Osteologie dieses Coelurosauriers. Palaeontographica, Supplement 7, 1, 279-286.
  24. --1929b. Material und Formengehalt der Sauropoden in der Ausbeute der Tendaguru-Expedition. Palaeontographica, Sup- plement 7, 1, 3-34.
  25. --1955. Der Ornithopode Dysalotosaurus der Tendagurus- chichten. Palaeontographica, Supplement 7, 1, 105-176.
  26. --1961. Die Gliedmaszen und Gliedmaszengu ¨rtel der Sauro- poden der Tendaguru-Schichten. Palaeontographica, Supple- ment 7, 1, 177-235.
  27. J E N S E N , J. A. and P A D I A N , K. 1989. Small pterosaurs and dinosaurs from the Uncompahgre fauna (Brushy Basin Mem- ber, Morrison Formation?Tithonian), Late Jurassic, western Colorado. Journal of Paleontology, 63, 364-373.
  28. J I Q I AN G, J I S H U -AN and ZH A NG LI -J U N 2009. First large tyrannosauroid theropod from the Early Cretaceous Je- hol Biota in northeastern China. Geological Bulletin of China, 28, 1369-1374.
  29. J U A R E Z V A L I E R I , R., F I O R E L L I , L. E. and C R U Z , L. E. 2007. Quilmesaurus curriei Coria, 2001 (Dinosauria, Thero- poda). Su validez taxono ´mica y relaciones filogene ´ticas. Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, 9, 59-66.
  30. K E L L N E R , A. W. A. and C A M P O S , D. D. A. 2002. On a new theropod dinosaur (Abelisauria) from the continental Cretaceous of Brazil. Arquivos do Museu Nacional, 60, 163- 170.
  31. L E L O E U F F , J. and B U F F E T A U T , E. 1991. Tarascosaurus salluvicus nov. gen., nov. sp., dinosaure the ´ropode du Cre ´tace śupe ´rieur du sud de la France. Geobios, 25, 585-594.
  32. L E A N Z A , H. A., A P E S T E G U I A , S., N O V A S , F. E. and D E L A F U E N T E , M. S. 2004. Cretaceous terrestrial beds from the Neuque ´n Basin (Argentina) and their tetrapod assem- blages. Cretaceous Research, 25, 61-87.
  33. L I DAQING, N O R E L L , M. A., GA O KE-QIN, S M I T H , N. D. and M A K O V I C K Y , P. J. 2010. A longirostrine tyran- nosauroid from the Early Cretaceous of China. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B, 277, 183-190.
  34. --P E N G CUO, Y O U HAILU, L A M A N N A , M. C., H A R - R I S , J. D., L A C O V A R A , K. J. and Z H A N G J IA NP I NG 2007. A large therizinosauroid (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from the Early Cretaceous of northwestern China. Acta Geologica Sinica, 81, 539-549.
  35. M A D S E N , J. H. 1974. A new theropod dinosaur from the Upper Jurassic of Utah. Journal of Paleontology, 48, 27-31.
  36. --1976a. Allosaurus fragilis: a revised osteology. Utah Geologi- cal and Mineralogical Survey Bulletin, 109, 3-163.
  37. --1976b. A second new theropod dinosaur from the Late Jurassic of east central Utah. Utah Geology, 3, 51-60.
  38. --and W E L L E S , S. P. 2000. Ceratosaurus (Dinosauria, Theropoda). A revised osteology. Miscellaneous Publication, Utah Geological Survey, 00-2, 1-80.
  39. M A H L E R , L. 2005. Record of Abelisauridae (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from the Cenomanian of Morocco. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 25, 236-239.
  40. M A I E R , G. 2003. African dinosaurs unearthed. Indiana Univer- sity Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis, 380 pp.
  41. M A K O V I C K Y , P. J. 1997. A new small theropod from the Morrison Formation of Como Bluff, Wyoming. Journal of Ver- tebrate Paleontology, 17, 755-757.
  42. --A P E S T E G U I A , S. and A G N O L I N , F. L. 2005. The ear- liest dromaeosaurid theropod from South America. Nature, 437, 1007-1011.
  43. --L I DAQING, G A O KE-QIN, L E W I N , M., E R I C K - S O N , G. M. and N O R E L L , M. A. 2010. A giant ornithomi- mosaur from the Early Cretaceous of China. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B, 277, 191-198.
  44. M A R S H , O. C. 1878. Notice of new dinosaurian reptiles. Amer- ican Journal of Science (Series 3), 15, 241-244.
  45. --1879. Principal characters of American Jurassic dinosaurs. Part II. American Journal of Science (Series 3), 17, 86-92.
  46. --1881a. Principal characters of American Jurassic dinosaurs. Part V. American Journal of Science (Series 3), 21, 417-423.
  47. --1881b. A new order of extinct Jurassic reptiles (Coeluria). American Journal of Science (Series 3), 21, 339-340.
  48. --1884. Principal characters of American Jurassic dinosaurs. Part VIII. The order Theropoda. American Journal of Science (Series 3), 27, 329-340.
  49. --1896. The dinosaurs of North America. Sixteenth Annual Report of the United States Geological Survey, 1894-95, 133- 244.
  50. A T E U S , O., W A L E N , A. and A N T U N E S , M. T. 2006. The large theropod fauna of the Lourinha Formatuion (Portu- gal) and its similarity to that of the Morrison Formation, with a description of new species of Allosaurus. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science, Bulletin, 36, 123-129.
  51. N O V A S , F. E. 2009. The age of dinosaurs in South America. Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis, 452 pp. --A G N O L I N , F. L. and B A N D Y O P A D H Y A Y , S. 2004. Cretaceous theropods from India: a review of specimens described by Huene and Matley (1933). Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, nueva serie, 6, 67-103.
  52. --P O L , D., C A N A L E , J. I., P O R F I R I , J. D. and C A L V O , J. O. 2009. A bizarre Cretaceous theropod dinosaur from Patagonia and the evolution of Gondwanan dromaeosaurids. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B, 276, 1101-1107.
  53. O ' C O N N O R , P. M. 2007. The postcranial axial skeleton of Majungasaurus crenatissimus (Theropoda: Abelisauridae) from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar. Society of Vertebrate Pale- ontology, Memoir, 8, 127-162.
  54. O R T E G A , F., E S C A S O , F. and S A N Z , J. L. 2010. A bizarre, humped Carcharodontosauria (Theropoda) from the Lower Cretaceous of Spain. Nature, 467, 203-206.
  55. O S B O R N , H. F. 1903. Ornitholestes hermanni, a new compsog- nathoid dinosaur from the Upper Jurassic. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 19, 459-464.
  56. O ¨S I , A., B U T L E R , R. J. and W E I S H A M P E L , D. B. 2010. A Late Cretaceous ceratopsian dinosaur from Europe with Asian affinities. Nature, 465, 466-468.
  57. O S M O ´L S K A , H., R O N I E W I C Z , E. and B A R S B O L D , R. 1972. A new dinosaur, Gallimimus bullatus n. gen., n. sp. (Ornithomimidae) from the Upper Cretaceous of Mongolia. Palaeontologia Polonica, 27, 103-143.
  58. O W E N , R. 1842. Report on British fossil reptiles. Part II. Reports of the British Association for the Advancement of Sciences, 11, 60-204.
  59. P A D I A N , K., H U T C H I N S O N , J. R. and H O L T Z , T. R. JR 1999. Phylogenetic definitions and nomenclature of the major taxonomic categories of the carnivorous Dinosauria (Theropoda). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 19, 69-80.
  60. P A U L , G. S. 1988. Predatory dinosaurs of the world. Simon and Schuster, New York, 464 pp.
  61. P E R E D A -S U B E R B I O L A , X. 2009. Biogeographical affinities of Late Cretaceous continental tetrapods from Europe: a review. Bulletin de la Societe ´ge ´ologique de France, 180, 57-71.
  62. R A A T H , M. A. 1969. A new coelurosaurian dinosaur from the Forest Sandstone of Rhodesia. Arnoldia, 4 (28), 1-25.
  63. --1977. The anatomy of the Triassic theropod Syntarsus rhode- siensis (Saurischia: Podokesauridae) and a consideration of its biology. Unpublished PhD thesis, Rhodes University, Grahams- town, 233 pp.
  64. R A U H U T , O. W. M. 1995. Zur systematischen Stellung der af- rikanischen Theropoden Carcharodontosaurus Stromer, 1931, und Bahariasaurus Stromer, 1934. Berliner geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen (E), 16.1, 357-375.
  65. --2003a. The interrelationships and evolution of basal thero- pod dinosaurs. Special Papers in Palaeontology, 69, 1-213.
  66. --2003b. A tyrannosauroid dinosaur from the Late Jurassic of Portugal. Palaeontology, 46, 903-910.
  67. --2004. Provenance and anatomy of Genyodectes serus, a large-toothed ceratosaur (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from Pata- gonia. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 24, 894-902.
  68. --2005a. Postcranial remains of ''coelurosaurs'' (Dinosauria, Theropoda) from the Late Jurassic of Tanzania. Geological Magazine, 142, 97-107.
  69. --2005b. Osteology and relationships of a new theropod dino- saur from the Middle Jurassic of Patagonia. Palaeontology, 48, 87-110.
  70. --2008. Cretaceous theropod faunas of Africa. 211. In C A L V O , J. O., J U A ´R E Z V A L I E R I , R., P O R F I R I , J. D. and D O S S A N T O S , D. (eds). III Congreso Latinamericano de Paleontologı ´a de Vertebrados, Libro de Resu ´menes. Honor- able Legislatura de la Provincia de Neuque ´n, Neuque ´n, 281 pp. --and K R I W E T , J. 1994. Teeth of a big theropod dinosaur from Porto das Barcas (Portugal). Berliner geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen (E), 13, 179-185.
  71. --and L O ´P E Z -A R B A R E L L O , A. 2008. Archosaur evolu- tion during the Jurassic: a southern perspective. Revista de la Asociacio ´n Geolo ´gica Argentina, 63, 557-585.
  72. --and W E R N E R , C. 1995. First record of the family Drom- aeosauridae (Dinosauria: Theropoda) in the Cretaceous of Gondwana (Wadi Milk Formation, northern Sudan). Pala ¨on- tologische Zeitschrift, 69, 475-489.
  73. --M I L N E R , A. C. and M O O R E -F A Y , S. C. 2010. Cranial osteology and phylogenetic position of the theropod dinosaur Proceratosaurus bradleyi (Woodward, 1910) from the Middle Jurassic of England. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 158, 155-195.
  74. --C L A D E R A , G., V I C K E R S -R I C H , P. and R I C H , T. H. V. 2003. Dinosaur remains from the Lower Cretaceous of the Chubut Group, Argentina. Cretaceous Research, 24, 487-497.
  75. R E M E S , K. 2006. Revision of the Tendaguru sauropod Tornie- ria africana (Fraas) and its relevance for sauropod paleobioge- ography. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 26, 651-669.
  76. --2007. A second Gondwanan diplodocid dinosaur from the Upper Jurassic Tendaguru Beds of Tanzania, East Africa. Palaeontology, 50, 653-667.
  77. --2009. Taxonomy of Late Jurassic diplodocoid sauropods from Tendaguru (Tanzania). Fossil Record, 12, 23-46.
  78. R I C H , T. H. and V I C K E R S -R I C H , P. 1994. Neoceratopsians and ornithomimosaurs: dinosaurs of Gondwana origin. National Geographic Research and Exploration, 10, 129-131.
  79. R O W E , T. and G A U T H I E R , J. 1990. Ceratosauria. 151-168. In W E I S H A M P E L , D. B., D O D S O N , P. and O S M O ´L S K A , H. (eds). The Dinosauria. University of Cali- fornia Press, Berkeley, 733 pp.
  80. R U I Z -O M E N ˜A C A , J. I., C A N U D O , J. I., C R U Z A D O - C A B A L L E R O , P., I N F A N T E , P. and M O R E N O -A Z A - N Z A , M. 2005. Baryonychine teeth (Theropoda: Spinosauri- dae) from the Lower Cretaceous of La Cantalera (Josa, NE Spain). Kaupia, 14, 59-63.
  81. R U S S E L L , D. A. and D O N G ZH I M I NG 1994. The affinities of a new theropod dinosaur from the Alxa desert, Inner Mon- golia, People's Republic of China. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 30, 2107-2127.
  82. S A D L E I R , R., B A R R E T T , P. M. and P O W E L L , H. P. 2008. The anatomy and systematics of Eustreptospondylus oxoniensis, a theropod dinosaur from the Middle Jurassic of Oxfordshire, England. Palaeontographical Society Monographs, 160 (627), 1- 82 + 20 pls.
  83. S A L G A D O , L. 1999. The macroevolution of the Diplodoci- morpha (Dinosauria; Sauropoda): a developmental model. Ameghiniana, 36, 203-216.
  84. S A M P S O N , S. D. and K R A U S E , D. W. 2007. Majungsaurus crenatissimus (Theropoda: Abelisauridae) from the Late Creta- ceous of Madagascar. Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, Mem- oir, 8, 1-184.
  85. --C A R R A N O , M. T. and F O R S T E R , C. A. 2001. A bizarre predatory dinosaur from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar. Nature, 409, 504-506.
  86. --W I T M E R , L. M., F O R S T E R , C. A., K R A U S E , D. W., O ' C O N N O R , P. M., D O D S O N , P. and R A V O A V Y , F. 1998. Predatory dinosaur remains from Madagascar: implica- tions for the Cretaceous biogeography of Gondwana. Science, 280, 1048-1051.
  87. S A N K E Y , J. T. 2001. Late Campanian southern dinosaurs, Aguja Formation, Big Bend, Texas. Journal of Paleontology, 75, 208-215.
  88. --B R I N K M A N , D. B., G U E N T H E R , M. and C U R R I E , P. J. 2002. Small theropod and bird teeth from the Late Creta- ceous (Late Campanian) Judith River Group, Alberta. Journal of Paleontology, 76, 751-763.
  89. S E R E N O , P. C. 1998. A rationale for phylogenetic definitions, with application to the higher-level taxonomy of Dinosauria. Neues Jahrbuch fu ¨r Geologie und Pala ¨ontologie, Abhandlungen, 210, 41-83.
  90. --and B R U S A T T E , S. L. 2008. Basal abelisaurid and carcharodontosaurid theropods from the Lower Cretaceous Elrhaz Formation of Niger. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 53, 15-46.
  91. --W I L S O N , J. A. and C O N R A D , J. L. 2004. New dino- saurs link southern landmasses in the Mid-Cretaceous. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B, 271, 1325-1330.
  92. --B E C K , A. L., D U T H E I L , D. B., G A D O , B., L A R S - S O N , H. C. E., L Y O N , G. H., M A R C O T , J. D., R A U - H U T , O. W. M., S A D L E I R , R. W., S I D O R , C.
  93. A., V A R R I C C H I O , D. J., W I L S O N , G. P. and W I L S O N , J. A. 1998. A long-snouted predatory dinosaur from Africa and the evolution of the spinosaurids. Science, 282, 1298-1302.
  94. --D U T H E I L , D. B., I A R O C H E N E , M., L A R S S O N , H. C. E., L Y O N , G. H., M A G W E N E , P. M., S I D O R , C. A., V A R R I C C H I O , D. J. and W I L S O N , J. A. 1996. Predatory dinosaurs from the Sahara and Late Cretaceous faunal differ- entiation. Science, 272, 986-991.
  95. --M A R T I N E Z , R. N., W I L S O N , J. A., V A R R I C C H I O , D. J., A L C O B E R , O. A. and L A R S S O N , H. C. E. 2008. Evidence for avian intathoracic air sacs in a new predatory dinosaur from Argentina. PLoS ONE, 3, 1-20.
  96. --W I L S O N , J. A., L A R S S O N , H. C. E., D U T H E I L , D. B. and S U E S , H.-D. 1994. Early Cretaceous dinosaurs from the Sahara. Science, 266, 267-271.
  97. S M I T H , D. K. 1998. A morphometric analysis of Allosaurus. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 18, 126-142.
  98. S M I T H , J. B. 2007. Dental morphology and variation in Ma- jungasaurus crenatissimus (Theropoda: Abelisauridae) from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar. Society of Vertebrate Paleontol- ogy, Memoir, 8, 103-126.
  99. --and L A M A N N A , M. C. 2006. An abelisaurid from the Late Cretaceous of Egypt: implications for theropod biogeog- raphy. Naturwissenschaften, 93, 242-245.
  100. --V A N N , D. R. and D O D S O N , P. 2005. Dental morphol- ogy and variation in theropod dinosaurs: implications for the taxonomic identification of isolated teeth. The Anatomical Record Part A, 285A, 699-736.
  101. S M I T H , N. D., M A K O V I C K Y , P. J., H A M M E R , W. R. and C U R R I E , P. J. 2007. Osteology of Cryolophosaurus ellioti (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from the Early Jurassic Antarctica and implications for early theropod evolution. Zoological Jour- nal of the Linnean Society, 151, 377-421.
  102. ----A G N O L I N , F. L., E Z C U R R A , M. D., P A I S , D. F. and S A L I S B U R Y , S. W. 2008. A Megaraptor-like theropod (Dinosauria: Tetanurae) in Australia: support for faunal exchange across eastern and western Gondwana in the Mid- Cretaceous. Proceedings of the Royal Society London, B, 275, 2085-2093.
  103. S O T O , M. and P E R E A , D. 2008. A ceratosaurid (Dinosauria, Theropoda) from the Late Jurassic -Early Cretaceous of Uru- gay. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 28, 439-444.
  104. S T O V A L L , J. W. and L A N G S T O N , W. J. 1950. Acrocantho- saurus atokensis, a new genus and species of Lower Cretaceous Theropoda from Oklahoma. American Midland Naturalist, 43, 696-728.
  105. S T R O M E R , E. 1931. Ergebnisse der Forschungsreisen Prof. E. Stromers in den Wu ¨sten A ¨gyptens. II. Wirbeltierreste der Baharije-Stufe (unterstes Cenoman). 10. Ein Skelett-Rest von Carcharodontosaurus nov. gen. Abhandlungen der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-naturwissenschaft- liche Abteilung, Neue Folge, 9, 1-23.
  106. T A Y L O R , M. P. 2009. A re-evaluation of Brachiosaurus altitho- rax Riggs 1903 (Dinosauria, Sauropoda) and its generic sepa- ration from Giraffatitan brancai (Janensch 1914). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 29, 787-806.
  107. T U R N E R , A. H., S M I T H , N. D. and C A L L E R Y , J. A. 2009. Gauging the effects of sampling failure in biogeographic analy- sis. Journal of Biogeography, 36, 612-625.
  108. T Y K O S K I , R. S. 2005. Anatomy, ontogeny, and phylogeny of coelophysoid theropods. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Texas, Austin, 553 pp.
  109. --and R O W E , T. 2004. Ceratosauria. 47-70. In W E I - S H A M P E L , D. B., D O D S O N , P. and O S M O ´L S K A , H. (eds). The Dinosauria. Second edition. University of California Press, Berkeley, 861 pp.
  110. V I C K E R S -R I C H , P., R I C H , T. H., L A N U S , D. R., R I C H , L. S. V. and V A C C A , R. 1999. 'Big tooth' from the Early Creta- ceous of Chubut Province, Patagonia: a possible carcharodonto- saurid. National Science Museum Monographs, 15, 85-88.
  111. W E I S H A M P E L , D. B., B A R R E T T , P. M., C O R I A , R. A., L E L O E U F F , J., X U XI N G, Z H A O XI J IN , S A H N I , A., G O M A N I , E. M. P. and N O T O , C. R. 2004. Dinosaur dis- tribution. 517-606. In W E I S H A M P E L , D. B., D O D S O N , P. and O S M O ´L S K A , H. (eds). The Dinosauria. Second edi- tion. University of California Press, Berkeley, 861 pp. --C S I K I , Z., B E N T O N , M. J., G R I G O R E S C U , D. and C O D R E A , V. 2010. Palaeobiogeographic relationships of the Hateg biota -between isolation and innovation. Palaeogeogra- phy, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 293, 419-437.
  112. W E L L E S , S. P. 1984. Dilophosaurus wetherilli (Dinosauria, Theropoda). Osteology and comparisons. Palaeontographica A, 185, 85-180.
  113. --and L O N G , R. A. 1974. The tarsus of theropod dinosaurs. Annals of the South African Museum, 64, 191-218.
  114. W I L S O N , J. A., S E R E N O , P. C., S R I V A S T A V A , S., B H A T T , D. K., K H O S L A , A. and S A H N I , A. 2003. A new abelisaurid (Dinosauria, Theropoda) from the Lameta Forma- tion (Cretaceous, Maastrichtian) of India. Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, 31, 1-42.
  115. XU XING, CLARK, J. M., MO JINYOU, CHOINIERE, J. N., F O R S T E R , C. A., E R I C K S O N , G. M., H O N E , D. W. E., S U L L I V A N , C., E B E R T H , D. A., N E S B I T T , S. J., Z H A O QI, H E R N A N D E Z , R., J I A CHENGKAI, H A N FEN GLU and G U O Y U 2009. A Jurassic ceratosaur from China helps to clarify avian digital homologies. Nature, 459, 940-944.
  116. Y A T E S , A. M. 2005. A new theropod dinosaur from the Early Jurassic of South Africa and its implications for the early evo- lution of theropods. Palaeontologia africana, 41, 105-122.
  117. Z A R C O N E , G., P E T T I , F. M., C I L L A R I , A., D I S T E F - A N O , P., G U Z Z E T T A , D. and N I C O S I A , U. 2010. A possible bridge between Adria and Africa: new palaeobiogeo- graphical and stratigraphic constraints on the Mesozoic palae- ogeography of the Central Mediterranean area. Earth-Science Reviews, 103, 154-162.
  118. Z I N K E , J. and R A U H U T , O. W. M. 1994. Small theropods (Dinosauria, Saurischia) from the Upper Jurassic and Lower Cretaceous of the Iberian peninsula. Berliner geowissenschaftli- che Abhandlungen (E), 13, 163-177.

FAQs

sparkles

AI

What distinguishes the theropod fauna of Tendaguru from northern Cretaceous faunas?add

The study identifies notable differences, such as lower coelurosaur diversity and higher abundance of basal tetanurans like abelisauroids and carcharodontosaurs in Tendaguru.

How was the diversity of theropod taxa in Tendaguru estimated?add

The research outlines a minimum of seven distinct theropod taxa, including four ceratosaurs and three basal tetanurans, based on isolated teeth and limb elements.

What techniques were used to revise taxonomic statuses of theropod remains?add

Taxonomic revisions involved morphological comparisons with well-preserved specimens and comprehensive analyses of dental and skeletal features among various theropod groups.

What new insights does Veterupristisaurus provide about theropod evolution?add

Veterupristisaurus represents an early carcharodontosaurid, indicating that carcharodontosaurian diversification predated the Kimmeridgian, suggesting earlier global distribution.

Why is the identification of Allosaurus(?) tendagurensis problematic?add

Allosaurus(?) tendagurensis is treated as a nomen dubium due to its lack of unique diagnostic characters distinguishing it from other large theropods.

Related papers

Post-cranial remains of ‘coelurosaurs’ (Dinosauria, Theropoda) from the Late Jurassic of Tanzania

Geological Magazine, 2005

Small theropod post-cranial material from Tendaguru, Tanzania, the only known Late Jurassic theropod locality in the Southern Hemisphere, is reviewed. Material originally described as 'coelurosaurs' includes at least one taxon of basal tetanuran and one taxon of small abelisauroid. Together with the abelisauroid Elaphrosaurus and the presence of a larger ceratosaur in Tendaguru, this material indicates that ceratosaurs were an important faunal element of Late Jurassic East African theropod faunas. One bone furthermore shares derived characters with the holotype of the poorly known Middle Jurassic Australian theropod Ozraptor and allows the identification of the latter as the oldest known abelisauroid, thus indicating an early divergence of ceratosaurids and abelisauroids within ceratosaurs. Abelisauroids might have originated in Gondwana and represent important faunal elements of Cretaceous Gondwanan theropod faunas in general.

Anatomical, morphometric, and stratigraphic analyses of theropod biodiversity in the Upper Cretaceous (Campanian) Dinosaur Park Formation 1

Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 2021

The Dinosaur Park Formation (DPF) of Alberta, Canada, has produced one of the most diverse dinosaur faunas, with the record favouring large-bodied taxa, in terms of number and completeness of skeletons. Although small theropods are well documented in the assemblage, taxonomic assessments are frequently based on isolated, fragmentary skeletal elements. Here we reassess DPF theropod biodiversity using morphological comparisons, high-resolution biostratigraphy, and morphometric analyses, with a focus on specimens/taxa originally described from isolated material. In addition to clarifying taxic diversity, we test whether DPF theropods preserve faunal zonation/turnover patterns similar to those previously documented for megaherbivores. Frontal bones referred to a therizinosaur (cf. Erlikosaurus), representing among the only skeletal record of the group from the Campanian-Maastrichtian (83-66 Ma) fossil record of North America, plot most closely to troodontids in morphospace, distinct from non-DPF therizinosaurs, a placement supported by a suite of troodontid anatomical frontal characters. Postcranial material referred to cf. Erlikosaurus in North America is also reviewed and found most similar in morphology to caenagnathids, rather than therizinosaurs. Among troodontids, we document considerable morphospace and biostratigraphic overlap between Stenonychosaurus and the recently described Latenivenatrix, as well as a variable distribution of putatively autapomorphic characters, calling the validity of the latter taxon into question. Biostratigraphically, there are no broad-scale patterns of faunal zonation similar to those previously documented in ornithischians from the DPF, with many theropods ranging throughout much of the formation and overlapping extensively, possibly reflecting a lack of sensitivity to environmental changes, or other cryptic ecological or evolutionary factors.

The osteology of Masiakasaurus knopfleri , a small abelisauroid (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar

Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 2002

We describe the osteology of the new small theropod dinosaur Masiakasaurus knopfleri, from the Late Cretaceous Maevarano Formation of northwestern Madagascar. Approximately 40% of the skeleton is known, including parts of the jaws, axial column, forelimb, pelvic girdle, and hind limb. The jaws of Masiakasaurus are remarkably derived, bearing a heterodont, procumbent dentition that is unknown elsewhere among dinosaurs. The vertebrae are similar to those of abelisauroids in the reduction of the neural spine, lack of pleurocoelous fossae on the centrum, and extensively pneumatized neural arch. The limb skeleton is relatively gracile and bears numerous abelisauroid synapomorphies, including a rounded humeral head, peg-and-socket iliac-pubic articulation, prominent femoral medial epicondyle, expanded tibial cnemial crest, and double-grooved pedal unguals. The femora and tibiae show evidence of dimorphism. More specific features shared between Masiakasaurus, the Argentine Noasaurus, and the Indian Laevisuchus suggest that these taxa form a clade (Noasauridae) within Abelisauroidea. This is supported by a cladistic phylogenetic analysis of 158 characters and 23 theropod taxa. Additionally, Ceratosauria is rendered paraphyletic in favor of a sister-taxon relationship between Neoceratosauria and Tetanurae that is exclusive of Coelophysoidea. The unique dental and jaw specializations of Masiakasaurus suggest deviation from the typical theropod diet. Finally, the distribution of noasaurids further supports a shared biogeographic history between South America, Madagascar, and India into the Late Cretaceous.

Chapter 7 - The phylogeny of Dinosauria: Terminal taxa and anatomical characters

The model of dinosaur classification that was first proposed by Seeley in 1887that all dinosaurs can be grouped in to either Saurischia (lizard-hipped) or Ornithischia (bird-hipped)is one of the most prevalent ideas in the history of archosaur study. However, a recent large-scale phylogenetic analysis of early dinosaurs challenged this view and presented an alternative hypothesis in which Ornithischia and Saurischia did not share a sister-taxon relationship; Ornithischia and Theropoda were found to be sister-taxa (within a monophyletic Ornithoscelida), and a monophyletic Saurischia was recovered that comprised Sauropodomorpha and Herrerasauridae but not Theropoda. The Ornithoscelida-Saurischia (= Ornithoscelida-Pachypodosauria) model has subsequently been re-evaluated by a number of other studies and each of these has added to and modified the early dinosaur dataset of the original study.

A re-evaluation of several character states in non-coelurosaurian Tetanurae (Dinosauria: Theropoda) with implications for phylogeny of basal tetanurans

Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology Program and Abstracts, 2015

A majority of recent phylogenetic analyses of Tetanurae (Dinosauria: Theropoda) place basal (= non-coelurosaurian) tetanurans into clades Megalosauroidea and Allosauroidea forming successively closer outgroups to Coelurosauria. However, the positions of genera Cryolophosaurus, Sinosaurus, Monolophosaurus and Acrocanthosaurus and clade Megaraptora remain controversial and a few phylogenetic analyses question the monophyly of both Megalosauroidea and Allosauroidea. This presentation re-evaluates the phylogeny of non-coelurosaurian Tetanurae by re-examining highly distinct and size- and ecomorphology-independent states of several characters used in previous analyses. Cryolophosaurus possesses a small lesser trochanter, indicating it is among the most basal neotheropods (Coelophysis, Dilophosaurus). Sinosaurus retains a distally expanded scapula of the most basal neotheropods but shares with Ceratosauria & Tetanurae a large lesser trochanter, suggesting that it is more derived than the former but less derived than the latter. Spinosauridae and Carcharodontosauridae (except Acrocanthosaurus and Eocarcharia) possess a lesser trochanter extending proximally to the ventral margin of femoral head and lack a maxillary fenestra, suggesting that they are the most basal tetanurans. Piatnitzkysauridae, Metriacanthosauridae, Neovenator, Megaraptora, Megalosauridae, Acrocanthosauridae (Acrocanthosaurus, Eocarcharia) and Allosauridae (Allosaurus, Saurophaganax) share with basal Coelurosauria (Zuolong, Tanycolagreus, Coelurus, Tyrannosauroidea) a lesser trochanter extending proximally to the middle of femoral head (lesser trochanter extends proximally to the dorsal margin of femoral head in Megaraptora, Tyrannosauridae, and ornithomimosaur Beishanlong). The above basal tetanurans and Monolophosaurus also share with Coelurosauria a maxillary fenestra. Megalosauridae, Monolophosaurus, Acrocanthosauridae and Allosauridae share with Coelurosauria a posteroventrally expanded surangular contact of dentary and a metacarpal IV less than 25% of metacarpal III or absent, forming a clade Avetheropoda. Monolophosaurus, Acrocanthosauridae and Allosauridae also share with basal Coelurosauria (Zuolong, Tanycolagreus, Tyrannosauroidea, Ornitholestes) a robust dorsal ramus of quadratojugal, forming a clade Euavetheropoda. Allosauridae share with Coelurosauria a medially open maxillary antrum (evolved independently in Metriacanthosauridae and Eocarcharia).

The Phylogenetic Position of the Tyrannosauridae: Implications for Theropod Systematics

Journal of Paleontology, 1994

Cretaceous theropods from India: A review of specimens described by Huene and Matley (1933)

Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, 2004

The Lato Cretaceous (Maas~richtian) Lameta Ihrmation of central India has yielded dissociated elements ofavariety ofpredatory dinosaurs, most ofthem comingfrom aquarry named the e~Carnosaur bed. The materials were described hv Huene and Matlev nearly 70 years ago. They recomized nine iheronod species, which they. "-.. sorted out into the theropod subgroups 4!arnosaiirian and eaCoelurasauria~~, I-iuene and Matley also described a considerable amount of theropod hindlimb bones (e.g., femora, tibiae, metat,arsals, and pedal phalanges) that they oilld not refer to any of these species, hut vaguely interpreted as corresponding to ~~allosaurid~~ or ,~coelurosaurid,~ theropods. We reviewed the available collection of Cretaceous therapods from Bara Simla housed at the Geological Survey of India. Kolkata. avrivlne to the foliowine conclusions: 1) Indosuchus and Indosaurus are abelisaurids, as-recognized by previous authors, hut avsilable information is not enough to judge whether they axi re synonyms; 2) Lmt~oisuchus indicus is a small abclisauroid, related to Noasaurus and Masiahasaurus on the basis or their peculiar cervical vortcbrae: 3: the coiitroversial taxa *Clorn~sosuc~ius-. ~iDruolosauroidesn, ,~Ornithornirnoides*. and also exhihit ahelisauroid characters. and bones of iaree size are tentatively referrod to as corresnondine to h~dosi~chus or Indosai~~zs, whereas some pedal bones of smaller size may belong to i,aeoisuckus; 5) two kinds of abelisaurid feet arcapparent: ansin which the nhaianpes ofdieit 111 andIVarerobust, and another typein which the iiliaianze-es. .-~. of digit IV are transversely narrow and dorsoventrally deep. This reviow demonstrates that all of the theropod eloments discovered at the ,,Carnosaur bed,) belong to a single theropod clade, tho Abelisauroidev.

Coelophysids (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from the Upper Triassic (Revueltian) Snyder Quarry

New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin, 2003

Abstract—The Snyder quarry preserves one of the richest assemblages of Norian theropods in the world, and the second-most productive theropod locality in the Chinle Group. At least four coelophysid theropods are preserved at the Snyder quarry, based on tibiae. Most elements of these theropods are represented, including an incomplete skull and lower jaws, cervical, dorsal, sacral, and caudal vertebrae, a scapulocoracoid, ilia, ischia, femora, tibiae, a fibula, astragalocalcanea, and diverse carpals and tarsals. These specimens ...

New theropod (Tetanurae: Avetheropoda) material from the ‘mid’-Cretaceous Griman Greek Formation at Lightning Ridge, New South Wales, Australia

Royal Society Open Science, 2019

A revision of Titanosaurus Lydekker (dinosauria ‐ sauropoda), the first dinosaur genus with a ‘Gondwanan’ distribution

Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 2003

SYNOPSIS Titanosaurs represent approximately one-third of sauropod diversity and were geographically widespread throughout the Cretaceous, especially on southern continents. Titanosaurs evolved numerous appendicular synapomorphies that account for their specialised 'wide-gauge' limb posture, which can be recognised in their trackways. The macronarian origin of titanosaurs is only recently agreed upon and aspects of their interrelationships remain poorly understood. Titanosauria is named for the poorly known genus Titanosaurus, which was coined by Lydekker in 1877 on the basis of a partial femur and two incomplete caudal vertebrae. Fourteen species have since been referred to Titanosaurus, which distribute the genus across Argentina, Europe, Madagascar, India and Laos, and throughout 60 million years of the Cretaceous. Despite its centrality to titanosaur systematics and biogeography, the genus Titanosaurus has never been revised. A re-evaluation of all Titanosaurus species recognises as diagnostic only five. The type species T. indicus is invalid because it is based on 'obsolescent' characters-once diagnostic features that have gained a broader taxonomic distribution over time. Consequently, the genus Titanosaurus and its coordinated rank-taxa (e.g. Titanosaurinae, Titanosauridae, Titanosauroidea) must be abandoned. The unranked taxon Titanosauria, however, remains valid. A new phylogenetic taxonomy is proposed for Titanosauria that utilises nodes that have been judged stable by the most recent cladistic analyses. The early appearance of titanosaur ichnofossils (Middle Jurassic) and body fossils (Late Jurassic) precludes a vicariant origin for the group, but such a pattern cannot yet be ruled out for lower-level taxa within Titanosauria.

Cited by

Theropod guild structure and the tyrannosaurid niche assimilation hypothesis: implications for predatory dinosaur macroecology and ontogeny in later Late Cretaceous Asiamerica1

Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 2021

Well-sampled dinosaur communities from the Jurassic through the early Late Cretaceous show greater taxonomic diversity among larger (&gt;50 kg) theropod taxa than communities of the Campano-Maastrichtian, particularly to those of eastern/central Asia and Laramidia. The large carnivore guilds in Asiamerican assemblages are monopolized by tyrannosaurids, with adult medium-sized (50–500 kg) predators rare or absent. In contrast, various clades of theropods are found to occupy these body sizes in earlier faunas, including early tyrannosauroids. Assemblages with “missing middle-sized” predators are not found to have correspondingly sparser diversity of potential prey species recorded in these same faunas. The “missing middle-sized” niches in the theropod guilds of Late Cretaceous Laramidia and Asia may have been assimilated by juvenile and subadults of tyrannosaurid species, functionally distinct from their adult ecomorphologies. It is speculated that if tyrannosaurids assimilated the ni...

Academia
Academia
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2026 Academia. All rights reserved

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp