Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Wikipedia:WikiProject Belfast/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
<Wikipedia:WikiProject Belfast

The{{WikiProject Belfast}} template has aclass= parameter that provides an article assessment ratings:

Example: {{WikiProject Belfast| class=??? | importance=???}}

The following values may be used for the parameters. Please note that you musttype them exactly as below asthey are case-sensitive:

Article quality

[edit]
Belfast-related articles by quality and importance
QualityImportance
TopHighMidLowNA???Total
FA33
GA148215
B21521243193
C213327258177
Start22882189253554
Stub32359158243
List2431616
Category149149
Disambig44
File44
Project1212
Template55
NA11135974
Other11
Assessed7661633712355081,350
Total7661633712355081,350
WikiWork factors (?)ω =5,245Ω = 4.83

If a rating is not assigned when the{{WikiProject Belfast}} is added, the article will be filed inCategory:Unassessed Belfast-related articles by default. If assessing the article, the class should be assigned according to thegrading scheme. A list of Unassessed and In dispute articles can be discussed atWikipedia:WikiProject Belfast/Article assessment.

See also:List of Belfast-related articles by quality |Log (updated daily).

Article importance

[edit]

If an importance rating is not assigned, the article will be filed inCategory:Unknown-importance Belfast-related articles by default.


Legend

[edit]
Article progress grading scheme
FAReserved exclusively for articles that have received "Featured article" status afterpeer review, and meet the current criteria for featured articles. Example:Algorithm
AThe article provides a well-written, reasonably clear and complete description of the topic, as described inHow to write a Great Article. It includes a well-written introduction to the topic, and an appropriate series of headings to break up the article. It should have sufficient external literature references, preferably from textbooks or peer-reviewed papers rather than websites. It contain illustrations where apropriate (with no copyright problems). It should be at the stage where it meets the criteria for or is aGood article. Example:Ammonia (as of Oct 2005).
BThe article is "almost there" but it may be missing one of the following: references, balance of content, or an important section. Alternatively, the English may need a comprehensive rewrite to make it flow, or it may need to be edited to follow standard Englishspelling andconventions. For maths articles, articles which are overly technical and fail to explain the basics would often end up here. Example:Antarctica (as of Oct 2005) is a good start but contains too many lists, and it needs more prose content & references.
StartThe article has a good amount of content, but it is still weak in certain areas, and may lack a table. For example an article on Africa might cover the geography well, but be weak on history and culture. Example:Arithmetic (as of Oct 2005).
StubThe article is either a very short article or a stub that will need a lot of work to bring it to A-Class level, although there may be a significant amount of material in the article.

Need: The article's importance, regardless of its quality

TopSubject is a must-have for a print encyclopaedia
HighSubject contributes a depth of knowledge
MidSubject fills in more minor details
LowSubject is peripheral knowledge, possibly trivial

Quality: current article quality as per thegrading scheme

FAFeatured article
AArticle is well written, reasonably complete and referenced; possiblefeatured article candidate.
GAThis is agood article
BWe have a decent article, but it needs further editing
StartSignificant cleanup or expansion needed.
StubArticle missing or miserable, or a stub.


Articles by quality log

[edit]
This is a log of operations by abot. The contents of this page are unlikely to need human editing. In particular, links should not be disambiguated as this is ahistorical record.

January 14, 2010

[edit]
(No changes today)

January 7, 2010

[edit]
(No changes today)

December 31, 2009

[edit]
(No changes today)

December 24, 2009

[edit]
(No changes today)

December 1, 2009

[edit]
  1. REDIRECTWikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Belfast-related articles by quality log
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Belfast/Assessment&oldid=1008029518"
Categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp