Image ofSirius A and Sirius B taken by theHubble Space Telescope. Sirius B, which is a white dwarf, can be seen as a faint point of light to the lower left of the much brighter Sirius A.
Awhite dwarf is astellar core remnant composed mostly ofelectron-degenerate matter. A white dwarf is verydense: in anEarth sized volume, it packs a mass that is comparable to theSun. Nonuclear fusion takes place in a white dwarf; what light it radiates is from its residualheat.[1] The nearest known white dwarf isSirius B, at 8.6 light years, the smaller component of the Siriusbinary star. There are currently thought to be eight white dwarfs among the hundred star systems nearest the Sun.[2] The unusual faintness of white dwarfs was first recognized in 1910.[3]: 1 The namewhite dwarf was coined byWillem Jacob Luyten in 1922.
White dwarfs are thought to be the finalevolutionary state of stars whosemass is not high enough to become aneutron star orblack hole. This includes over 97% of the stars in theMilky Way.[4]: §1 After thehydrogen-fusing period of amain-sequence star oflow or intermediate mass ends, such a star will expand to ared giant and fusehelium tocarbon andoxygen in its core by thetriple-alpha process. If a red giant has insufficient mass to generate the core temperatures required to fuse carbon (around109 K), an inert mass of carbon and oxygen will build up at its center. After such a star sheds its outer layers and forms aplanetary nebula, it will leave behind a core, which is the remnant white dwarf.[5] Usually, white dwarfs are composed of carbon and oxygen (CO white dwarf). If the mass of the progenitor is between 7 and 9 solar masses (M☉), the core temperature will be sufficient to fuse carbon but notneon, in which case an oxygen–neon–magnesium (ONeMg orONe) white dwarf may form.[6] Stars of very low mass will be unable to fuse helium; hence, a helium white dwarf[7][8] may be formed by mass loss in aninteracting binary star system.[9]
Because the material in a white dwarf no longer undergoes fusion reactions, it lacks a heat source to support it againstgravitational collapse. Instead, it is supported only byelectron degeneracy pressure, causing it to be extremely dense. The physics of degeneracy yields a maximum mass for a non-rotating white dwarf, theChandrasekhar limit— approximately 1.44 timesM☉— beyond which electron degeneracy pressure cannot support it. A carbon–oxygen white dwarf which approaches this limit, typically by mass transfer from a companion star, may explode as aType Ia supernova via a process known ascarbon detonation;[1][5]SN 1006 is a likely example.
A white dwarf, very hot when it forms, gradually cools as it radiates its energy. This radiation, which initially has a highcolor temperature, lessens and reddens over time. Eventually a white dwarf will cool enough that its material will begin to crystallize into a coldblack dwarf.[4] The oldest known white dwarfs still radiate at temperatures of a few thousandkelvins, which establishes an observational limit on the maximum possibleage of the universe.[10]
The white dwarf companion of Sirius, Sirius B, was next to be discovered. During the nineteenth century, positional measurements of some stars became precise enough to measure small changes in their location.Friedrich Bessel used position measurements to determine that the stars Sirius (α Canis Majoris) andProcyon (α Canis Minoris) were changing their positions periodically. In 1844 he predicted that both stars had unseen companions.[14]
Bessel roughly estimated the period of the companion of Sirius to be about half a century;[14]C.A.F. Peters computed an orbit for it in 1851.[15] It was not until 31 January 1862 thatAlvan Graham Clark observed a previously unseen star close to Sirius, later identified as the predicted companion.[15]Walter Adams announced in 1915 that he had found the spectrum of Sirius B to be similar to that of Sirius.[16]
In 1917,Adriaan van Maanen discoveredvan Maanen's Star, an isolated white dwarf.[17] These three white dwarfs, the first discovered, are the so-calledclassical white dwarfs.[3]: 2 Eventually, many faint white stars that had highproper motion were found, indicating that they could be suspected to be low-luminosity stars close to the Earth, and hence white dwarfs.Willem Luyten appears to have been the first to use the termwhite dwarf when he examined this class of stars in 1922;[12][18][19][20][21] the term was later popularized byArthur Eddington.[12][22] Despite these suspicions, the first non-classical white dwarf was not definitely identified until the 1930s. 18 white dwarfs had been discovered by 1939.[3]: 3 Luyten and others continued to search for white dwarfs in the 1940s. By 1950, over a hundred were known,[23] and by 1999, over 2000 were known.[24] Since then theSloan Digital Sky Survey has found over 9000 white dwarfs, mostly new.[25]
Although white dwarfs are known with estimated masses as low as 0.17 M☉[26] and as high as 1.33 M☉,[27] the mass distribution is strongly peaked at 0.6 M☉, and the majority lie between 0.5 and 0.7 M☉.[27] The estimated radii of observed white dwarfs are typically 0.8–2% theradius of the Sun;[28] this is comparable to the Earth's radius of approximately 0.9% solar radius. A white dwarf, then, packs mass comparable to the Sun's into a volume that is typically a million times smaller than the Sun's; the average density of matter in a white dwarf must therefore be, very roughly,1000000 times greater than the average density of the Sun, or approximately106g/cm3, or 1 tonne per cubic centimetre.[1] A typical white dwarf has a density of between 104 and107 g/cm3. White dwarfs are composed of one of the densest forms of matter known, surpassed only by othercompact stars such asneutron stars and the hypotheticalquark stars.[29][30]
White dwarfs were found to be extremely dense soon after their discovery. If a star is in abinary system, as is the case for Sirius B or 40 Eridani B, it is possible to estimate its mass from observations of the binary orbit. This was done for Sirius B by 1910,[31] yielding a mass estimate of 0.94 M☉, which compares well with a more modern estimate of 1.00 M☉.[32] Since hotter bodies radiate more energy than colder ones, a star's surface brightness can be estimated from itseffective surface temperature, and that from itsspectrum. If the star's distance is known, its absolute luminosity can also be estimated. From the absolute luminosity and distance, the star's surface area and its radius can be calculated. Reasoning of this sort led to the realization, puzzling to astronomers at the time, that due to their relatively high temperature and relatively low absolute luminosity, Sirius B and 40 Eridani B must be very dense. WhenErnst Öpik estimated the density of a number of visual binary stars in 1916, he found that 40 Eridani B had a density of over25000 times that of theSun, which was so high that he called it "impossible".[33] AsArthur Eddington put it later, in 1927:[34]: 50
We learn about the stars by receiving and interpreting the messages which their light brings to us. The message of the companion of Sirius when it was decoded ran: "I am composed of material 3000 times denser than anything you have ever come across; a ton of my material would be a little nugget that you could put in a matchbox." What reply can one make to such a message? The reply which most of us made in 1914 was — "Shut up. Don't talk nonsense."
As Eddington pointed out in 1924, densities of this order implied that, according to the theory ofgeneral relativity, the light from Sirius B should begravitationally redshifted.[22] This was confirmed when Adams measured this redshift in 1925.[35]
Such densities are possible because white dwarf material is not composed ofatoms joined bychemical bonds, but rather consists of aplasma of unboundnuclei andelectrons. There is therefore no obstacle to placing nuclei closer than normally allowed byelectron orbitals limited by normal matter.[22] Eddington wondered what would happen when this plasma cooled and the energy to keep the atoms ionized was no longer sufficient.[39] This paradox was resolved byR. H. Fowler in 1926 by an application of the newly devisedquantum mechanics. Since electrons obey thePauli exclusion principle, no two electrons can occupy the samestate, and they must obeyFermi–Dirac statistics, also introduced in 1926 to determine the statistical distribution of particles that satisfy the Pauli exclusion principle.[40] At zero temperature, therefore, electrons cannot all occupy the lowest-energy, orground, state; some of them would have to occupy higher-energy states, forming a band of lowest-available energy states, theFermi sea. This state of the electrons, calleddegenerate, meant that a white dwarf could cool to zero temperature and still possess high energy.[39][41]
Compression of a white dwarf will increase the number of electrons in a given volume. Applying the Pauli exclusion principle, this will increase the kinetic energy of the electrons, thereby increasing the pressure.[39][42] Thiselectron degeneracy pressure supports a white dwarf against gravitational collapse. The pressure depends only on density and not on temperature. Degenerate matter is relatively compressible; this means that the density of a high-mass white dwarf is much greater than that of a low-mass white dwarf and that the radius of a white dwarf decreases as its mass increases.[1]
The existence of a limiting mass that no white dwarf can exceed without collapsing to a neutron star is another consequence of being supported by electron degeneracy pressure. Such limiting masses were calculated for cases of an idealized, constant density star in 1929 byWilhelm Anderson[43] and in 1930 byEdmund C. Stoner.[44] This value was corrected by considering hydrostatic equilibrium for the density profile, and the presently known value of the limit was first published in 1931 bySubrahmanyan Chandrasekhar in his paper "The Maximum Mass of Ideal White Dwarfs".[45] For a non-rotating white dwarf, it is equal to approximately5.7 M☉ /μe2, whereμe is the average molecular weight per electron of the star.[46]: eqn.(63) As the carbon-12 and oxygen-16 that predominantly compose a carbon–oxygen white dwarf both haveatomic numbers equal to half theiratomic weight, one should takeμe equal to 2 for such a star,[41] leading to the commonly quoted value of 1.4 M☉. (Near the beginning of the 20th century, there was reason to believe that stars were composed chiefly of heavy elements,[44]: 955 so, in his 1931 paper, Chandrasekhar set the average molecular weight per electron,μe, equal to 2.5, giving a limit of 0.91 M☉.) Together withWilliam Alfred Fowler, Chandrasekhar received theNobel Prize for this and other work in 1983.[47] The limiting mass is now called theChandrasekhar limit.[48]
If a carbon-oxygen white dwarf accreted enough matter to reach theChandrasekhar limit of about 1.44solar masses (for a non-rotating star), it would no longer be able to support the bulk of its mass through electron degeneracy pressure[49] and, in the absence of nuclear reactions, would begin to collapse.[50][51] However, the current view is that this limit is not normally attained; increasing temperature and density inside the core ignite carbon fusion as the star approaches the limit (to within about 1%) before collapse is initiated.[51][52] In contrast, for a core primarily composed of oxygen, neon and magnesium, the collapsing white dwarf will typically form aneutron star. In this case, only a fraction of the star's mass will be ejected during the collapse.[49]
If a white dwarf star accumulates sufficient material from a stellar companion to raise its core temperature enough toignitecarbon fusion, it will undergorunaway nuclear fusion, completely disrupting it. There are three avenues by which this detonation is theorised to happen: stableaccretion of material from a companion, the collision of two white dwarfs, or accretion that causes ignition in a shell that then ignites the core. The dominant mechanism by which type Ia supernovae are produced remains unclear.[53] Despite this uncertainty in how type Ia supernovae are produced, type Ia supernovae have very uniform properties and are usefulstandard candles over intergalactic distances. Some calibrations are required to compensate for the gradual change in properties or different frequencies of abnormal luminosity supernovae at high redshift, and for small variations in brightness identified by light curve shape or spectrum.[54][55][56]
White dwarfs have lowluminosity and therefore occupy a strip at the bottom of theHertzsprung–Russell diagram, a graph of stellar luminosity versus color or temperature. They should not be confused with low-luminosity objects at the low-mass end of the main sequence, such as thehydrogen-fusingred dwarfs, whose cores are supported in part by thermal pressure,[57] or the even lower-temperaturebrown dwarfs.[58]
The relationship between the mass and radius of white dwarfs can be estimated using the nonrelativisticFermi gas equation of state, which gives[59]: 25
whereR is the radius,M is the mass of the white dwarf, and the subscript indicates relative to the Sun. Thechemical potential, is a thermodynamic property giving the change in energy as one electron is added or removed; it relates to the composition of the star. Numerical treatment of more complete models have been tested against observational data with good agreement.[60]
Since this analysis uses the non-relativistic formulap2 / 2m for the kinetic energy, it is non-relativistic. When the electron velocity in a white dwarf is close to thespeed of light, the kinetic energy formula approachespc wherec is the speed of light, and it can be shown that the Fermi gas model has no stable equilibrium in theultrarelativistic limit. In particular, this analysis yields the maximum mass of a white dwarf, which is:[59]
The observation of many white dwarf stars implies that either they started with masses similar to the Sun or something dramatic happened to reduce their mass.[59]
Radius–mass relations for a model white dwarf.Mlimit is denoted asMCh.
For a more accurate computation of the mass-radius relationship and limiting mass of a white dwarf, one must compute theequation of state that describes the relationship between density and pressure in the white dwarf material. If the density and pressure are both set equal to functions of the radius from the center of the star, the system of equations consisting of thehydrostatic equation together with the equation of state can then be solved to find the structure of the white dwarf at equilibrium. In the non-relativistic case, the radius is inversely proportional to the cube root of the mass.[46]: eqn.(80) Relativistic corrections will alter the result so that the radius becomes zero at a finite value of the mass. This is the limiting value of the mass – called theChandrasekhar limit – at which the white dwarf can no longer be supported by electron degeneracy pressure. The graph on the right shows the result of such a computation. It shows how radius varies with mass for non-relativistic (blue curve) and relativistic (green curve) models of a white dwarf. Both models treat the white dwarf as a coldFermi gas in hydrostatic equilibrium. The average molecular weight per electron,μe, has been set equal to 2. Radius is measured in standard solar radii and mass in standard solar masses.[46][61]
These computations all assume that the white dwarf is non-rotating. If the white dwarf is rotating, the equation of hydrostatic equilibrium must be modified to take into account thecentrifugal pseudo-force arising from working in arotating frame.[62] For a uniformly rotating white dwarf, the limiting mass increases only slightly. If the star is allowed to rotate nonuniformly, andviscosity is neglected, then, as was pointed out byFred Hoyle in 1947,[63] there is no limit to the mass for which it is possible for a model white dwarf to be in static equilibrium. Not all of these model stars will bedynamically stable.[64]
Rotating white dwarfs and the estimates of their diameter in terms of the angular velocity of rotation has been treated in the rigorous mathematical literature.[65] The fine structure of the free boundary of white dwarfs has also been analysed mathematically rigorously.[66]
The degenerate matter that makes up the bulk of a white dwarf has a very lowopacity, because any absorption of a photon requires that an electron must transition to a higher empty state, which may not be possible as the energy of the photon may not be a match for the possible quantum states available to that electron, hence radiative heat transfer within a white dwarf is low; it does, however, have a highthermal conductivity. As a result, the interior of the white dwarf maintains an almost uniform temperature as it cools down, starting at approximately 108 K shortly after the formation of the white dwarf and reaching less than 106 K for the coolest known white dwarfs.[29] An outer shell of non-degenerate matter sits on top of the degenerate core. The outermost layers, which are cooler than the interior, radiate roughly as ablack body. A white dwarf remains visible for a long time, as its tenuous outer atmosphere slowly radiates the thermal content of the degenerate interior.[29]
The visible radiation emitted by white dwarfs varies over a wide color range, from the whitish-blue color of an O-, B- or A-type main sequence star to the yellow-orange of alate K- or early M-type star.[67] White dwarf effective surface temperatures extend from over150000 K[24] to barely under 4000 K.[68][69] In accordance with theStefan–Boltzmann law, luminosity increases with increasing surface temperature (proportional toT4); this surface temperature range corresponds to a luminosity from over 100 times that of the Sun to under1⁄10000 that of the Sun.[69] Hot white dwarfs, with surface temperatures in excess of30000 K, have been observed to be sources of soft (i.e., lower-energy)X-rays. This enables the composition and structure of their atmospheres to be studied by softX-ray andextreme ultraviolet observations.[70]
White dwarfs also radiateneutrinos through theUrca process.[71] This process has more effect on hotter and younger white dwarfs. Because neutrinos can pass easily through stellar plasma, they can drain energy directly from the dwarf's interior; this mechanism is the dominant contribution to cooling for approximately the first 20 million years of a white dwarf's existence.[29]
A comparison between the white dwarfIK Pegasi B (center), its A-class companion IK Pegasi A (left) and the Sun (right). This white dwarf has a surface temperature of35500 K.
As was explained byLeon Mestel in 1952, unless the white dwarfaccretes matter from a companion star or other source, its radiation comes from its stored heat, which is not replenished.[72][73]: §2.1 White dwarfs have an extremely small surface area to radiate this heat from, so they cool gradually, remaining hot for a long time.[5] As a white dwarf cools, its surface temperature decreases, the radiation that it emits reddens, and its luminosity decreases. Since the white dwarf has noenergy sink other than radiation, it follows that its cooling slows with time. The rate of cooling has been estimated for acarbon white dwarf of 0.59 M☉ with ahydrogen atmosphere. After initially taking approximately 1.5 billion years to cool to a surface temperature of 7140 K, cooling approximately 500 more kelvins to 6590 K takes around 0.3 billion years, but the next two steps of around 500 kelvins (to 6030 K and 5550 K) take first 0.4 and then 1.1 billion years.[74]: Table 2
Most observed white dwarfs have relatively high surface temperatures, between 8000 K and40000 K.[25][24] A white dwarf, though, spends more of its lifetime at cooler temperatures than at hotter temperatures, so we should expect that there are more cool white dwarfs than hot white dwarfs. Once we adjust for theselection effect that hotter, more luminous white dwarfs are easier to observe, we do find that decreasing the temperature range examined results in finding more white dwarfs.[75] This trend stops when we reach extremely cool white dwarfs; few white dwarfs are observed with surface temperatures below4000 K,[76] and one of the coolest so far observed,WD J2147–4035, has a surface temperature of approximately 3050 K.[77] The reason for this is that the Universe's age is finite;[78][79] there has not been enough time for white dwarfs to cool below this temperature. Thewhite dwarf luminosity function can therefore be used to find the time when stars started to form in a region; an estimate for the age of ourgalactic disk found in this way is 8 billion years.[75] A white dwarf will eventually, in many trillions of years, cool and become a non-radiatingblack dwarf in approximate thermal equilibrium with its surroundings and with thecosmic background radiation. No black dwarfs are thought to exist yet.[1]
At very low temperatures (<4000 K) white dwarfs with hydrogen in their atmosphere will be affected bycollision induced absorption (CIA) of hydrogen molecules colliding with helium atoms. This affects the optical red and infrared brightness of white dwarfs with a hydrogen or mixed hydrogen-helium atmosphere. This makes old white dwarfs with this kind of atmosphere bluer than the main cooling sequence. White dwarfs with hydrogen-poor atmospheres, such as WD J2147–4035, are less affected by CIA and therefore have a yellow to orange color.[80][77]
White dwarf core material is a completelyionizedplasma – a mixture ofnuclei andelectrons – that is initially in a fluid state. It was theoretically predicted in the 1960s that at a late stage of cooling, it shouldcrystallize into a solid state, starting at its center.[81] The crystal structure is thought to be abody-centered cubic lattice.[4][82] In 1995 it was suggested thatasteroseismological observations ofpulsating white dwarfs yielded a potential test of the crystallization theory,[83] and in 2004, observations were made that suggested approximately 90% of the mass ofBPM 37093 had crystallized.[84][85][86] Other work gives a crystallized mass fraction of between 32% and 82%.[87]
As a white dwarf core undergoes crystallization into a solid phase,latent heat is released, which provides a source of thermal energy that delays its cooling.[88] Another possible mechanism that was suggested to explain thiscooling anomaly in some types of white dwarfs is a solid–liquid distillation process: the crystals formed in the core are buoyant and float up, thereby displacing heavier liquid downward, thus causing a net release of gravitational energy.[89] Chemicalfractionation between the ionic species in the plasma mixture can release a similar or even greater amount of energy.[90][91][92] This energy release was first confirmed in 2019 after the identification of a pile up in the cooling sequence of more than15000 white dwarfs observed with theGaia satellite.[93]
Low-mass helium white dwarfs (mass < 0.20 M☉), often referred to as extremely low-mass white dwarfs (ELM WDs), are formed in binary systems. As a result of their hydrogen-rich envelopes, residual hydrogen burning via the CNO cycle may keep these white dwarfs hot for hundreds of millions of years.[94] In addition, they remain in a bloated proto-white dwarf stage for up to 2 Gyr before they reach the cooling track.[95]
Although most white dwarfs are thought to be composed of carbon and oxygen,spectroscopy typically shows that their emitted light comes from an atmosphere that is observed to be either hydrogen orhelium dominated. The dominant element is usually at least 1000 times more abundant than all other elements. As explained bySchatzman in the 1940s, the highsurface gravity is thought to cause this purity by gravitationally separating the atmosphere so that heavy elements are below and the lighter above.[97][98]: §§5–6 This atmosphere, the only part of the white dwarf visible to us, is thought to be the top of an envelope that is a residue of the star's envelope in theAGB phase and may also contain material accreted from theinterstellar medium. The envelope is believed to consist of a helium-rich layer with mass no more than1⁄100 of the star's total mass, which, if the atmosphere is hydrogen-dominated, is overlain by a hydrogen-rich layer with mass approximately1⁄10000 of the star's total mass.[69][59]: §§4–5
Although thin, these outer layers determine the thermal evolution of the white dwarf. The degenerate electrons in the bulk of a white dwarf conduct heat well. Most of a white dwarf's mass is therefore at almost the same temperature (isothermal), and it is also hot: a white dwarf with surface temperature between8000 K and16000 K will have a core temperature between approximately5000000 K and20000000 K. The white dwarf is kept from cooling very quickly only by its outer layers' opacity to radiation.[69]
Magnetic white dwarf without detectable polarization
E
Emission lines present
V
Variable
The first attempt toclassify white dwarf spectra appears to have been byG. P. Kuiper in 1941,[67][99] and various classification schemes have been proposed and used since then.[100][101] The system currently in use was introduced byEdward M. Sion, Jesse L. Greenstein and their coauthors in 1983 and has been subsequently revised several times. It classifies a spectrum by a symbol that consists of an initial D, a letter describing the primary feature of the spectrum followed by an optional sequence of letters describing secondary features of the spectrum (as shown in the adjacent table), and a temperature index number, computed by dividing50400 K by theeffective temperature. For example, a white dwarf with onlyHe I lines in its spectrum and an effective temperature of15000 K could be given the classification of DB3, or, if warranted by the precision of the temperature measurement, DB3.5. Likewise, a white dwarf with a polarizedmagnetic field, an effective temperature of17000 K, and a spectrum dominated byHe I lines that also had hydrogen features could be given the classification of DBAP3. The symbols "?" and ":" may also be used if the correct classification is uncertain.[24][67]
White dwarfs whose primary spectral classification is DA have hydrogen-dominated atmospheres. They make up the majority, approximately 80%, of all observed white dwarfs.[69] The next class in number is of DBs, approximately 16%.[27] The hot, above15000 K, DQ class (roughly 0.1%) have carbon-dominated atmospheres.[102] Those classified as DB, DC, DO, DZ, and cool DQ have helium-dominated atmospheres. Assuming that carbon and metals are not present, which spectral classification is seen depends on the effective temperature. Between approximately100000 K to45000 K, the spectrum will be classified DO, dominated by singly ionized helium. From30000 K to12000 K, the spectrum will be DB, showing neutral helium lines, and below about12000 K, the spectrum will be featureless and classified DC.[59]: §2.4 [69]
Molecular hydrogen (H2) has been detected in spectra of the atmospheres of some white dwarfs.[103] While theoretical work suggests that some types of white dwarfs may havestellar corona, searches at X-ray and radio wavelengths, where coronae are most easily detected, have been unsuccessful.[104][105]
A few white dwarves have been observed to have inhomogeneous atmosphere with one side dominated by hydrogen and the other side dominated by helium.[106]
Elements discovered in the atmosphere of white dwarfs colder than25000 K.
Around 25–33% of white dwarfs have metal lines in their spectra, which is notable because any heavy elements in a white dwarf should sink into the star's interior in just a small fraction of the star's lifetime.[107] The prevailing explanation for metal-rich white dwarfs is that they have recently accreted rockyplanetesimals.[107] The bulk composition of the accreted object can be measured from the strengths of the metal lines. For example, a 2015 study of the white dwarf Ton 345 concluded that its metal abundances were consistent with those of adifferentiated, rocky planet whose mantle had been eroded by the host star's wind during itsasymptotic giant branch phase.[108]
Since 1970, magnetic fields have been discovered in well over 200 white dwarfs, ranging from2×103 to109 gauss (0.2 T to 100 kT).[114] Many of the presently known magnetic white dwarfs are identified by low-resolution spectroscopy, which is able to reveal the presence of a magnetic field of 1 megagauss or more. Thus the basic identification process also sometimes results in discovery of magnetic fields.[115] White dwarf magnetic fields may also be measured without spectral lines, using the techniques of broadband circularpolarimetry, or maybe through measurement of their frequencies of radio emission via theelectron cyclotron maser.[105] It has been estimated that at least 10% of white dwarfs have fields in excess of 1 million gauss (100 T).[116][117] The magnetic fields in a white dwarf may allow for the existence of a new type ofchemical bond,perpendicular paramagnetic bonding, in addition toionic andcovalent bonds, though detecting molecules bonded in this way is expected to be difficult.[118]
The highly magnetized white dwarf in the binary systemAR Scorpii was identified in 2016 as the firstpulsar in which the compact object is a white dwarf instead of a neutron star.[119] A second white dwarf pulsar was discovered in 2023.[120]
DB spectral type, having onlyhelium absorption lines in its spectrum
GW Vir (GCVS:ZZO)
Atmosphere mostly C, He and O; may be divided intoDOV andPNNV stars
Early calculations suggested that there might be white dwarfs whose luminosityvaried with a period of around 10 seconds, but searches in the 1960s failed to observe this.[98]: §7.1.1 [123] The first variable white dwarf found wasHL Tau 76; in 1965 and 1966, and was observed to vary with a period of approximately 12.5 minutes.[124] The reason for this period being longer than predicted is that the variability of HL Tau 76, like that of the other pulsating variable white dwarfs known, arises from non-radialgravity wave pulsations.[98]: §7 Known types of pulsating white dwarf include theDAV, orZZ Ceti, stars, including HL Tau 76, with hydrogen-dominated atmospheres and the spectral type DA;[98]: 891, 895 DBV, orV777 Her, stars, with helium-dominated atmospheres and the spectral type DB;[69]: 3525 andGW Vir stars, sometimes subdivided intoDOV andPNNV stars, with atmospheres dominated by helium, carbon, and oxygen.[122][125] GW Vir stars are not, strictly speaking, white dwarfs, but are stars that are in a position on theHertzsprung–Russell diagram between the asymptotic giant branch and the white dwarf region. They may be calledpre-white dwarfs.[122][126] These variables all exhibit small (1%–30%) variations in light output, arising from a superposition of vibrational modes with periods of hundreds to thousands of seconds. Observation of these variations givesasteroseismological evidence about the interiors of white dwarfs.[127]
White dwarfs are thought to represent the end point ofstellar evolution for main-sequence stars with masses from about 0.07 to 10 M☉.[4][10] The composition of the white dwarf produced will depend on the initial mass of the star. Current galactic models suggest the Milky Way galaxy currently contains about ten billion white dwarfs.[128]
If the mass of a main-sequence star is lower than approximately half asolar mass, it will never become hot enough to ignite and fuse helium in its core.[129] It is thought that, over a lifespan that considerably exceeds the age of the universe (c. 13.8 billion years),[130] such a star will eventually burn all its hydrogen, for a while becoming ablue dwarf, and end its evolution as a helium white dwarf composed chiefly ofhelium-4 nuclei.[131] Due to the very long time this process takes, it is not thought to be the origin of the observed helium white dwarfs. Rather, they are thought to be mostly the product of mass loss in binary systems.[5][7][8][132][133][134] Proposals to explain those helium white dwarfs that are not part of binary systems include mass loss due to a large planetary companion, stars being stripped of material by companions exploding as supernovae, and various types of stellar mergers.[135][136]
If the mass of a main-sequence star is between 0.5 and 8 M☉,[129][137] its core will become sufficiently hot to fuse helium intocarbon andoxygen via thetriple-alpha process, but it will never become sufficiently hot to fuse carbon intoneon. Near the end of the period in which it undergoes fusion reactions, such a star will have a carbon–oxygen core that does not undergo fusion reactions, surrounded by an inner helium-burning shell and an outer hydrogen-burning shell. On the Hertzsprung–Russell diagram, it will be found on the asymptotic giant branch. It will then expel most of its outer material, creating aplanetary nebula, until only the carbon–oxygen core is left. This process is responsible for the carbon–oxygen white dwarfs that form the vast majority of observed white dwarfs.[132][138][139]
White dwarfs with a mass greater than1.05 M☉ are termed ultramassive white dwarfs. When formed in single-star systems, these are expected to have an oxygen-neon core. However, a significant fraction (~20%) of ultramassive white dwarfs are formed through white dwarf mergers. In this case the result is a carbon-oxygen ultramassive white dwarf.[140]
If a star is massive enough, its core will eventually become sufficiently hot to fuse carbon to neon, and then to fuse neon to iron. Such a star will not become a white dwarf, because the mass of its central, non-fusing core, initially supported by electron degeneracy pressure, will eventually exceed the largest possible mass supportable by degeneracy pressure. At this point the core of the star willcollapse and it will explode in acore-collapse supernova that will leave behind a remnant neutron star,black hole, or possibly a more exotic form ofcompact star.[10][141] Some main-sequence stars, of perhaps 8 to 10 M☉, although sufficiently massive tofuse carbon to neon and magnesium, may be insufficiently massive tofuse neon. Such a star may leave a remnant white dwarf composed chiefly ofoxygen, neon, andmagnesium, provided that its core does not collapse, and provided that fusion does not proceed so violently as to blow apart the star in asupernova.[142][137] Although a few white dwarfs have been identified that may be of this type, most evidence for the existence of such comes from the novae calledONeMg orneon novae. The spectra of thesenovae exhibit abundances of neon, magnesium, and other intermediate-mass elements that appear to be only explicable by the accretion of material onto an oxygen–neon–magnesium white dwarf.[6][143][144]
Type Iax supernovae, that involve helium accretion by a white dwarf, have been proposed to be a channel for transformation of this type of stellar remnant. In this scenario, the carbon detonation produced in a Type Ia supernova is too weak to destroy the white dwarf, expelling just a small part of its mass as ejecta, but produces an asymmetric explosion that kicks the star, often known as azombie star, to the high speeds of ahypervelocity star. The matter processed in the failed detonation is re-accreted by the white dwarf with the heaviest elements such asiron falling to its core where it accumulates.[145] Theseiron-core white dwarfs would be smaller than the carbon–oxygen kind of similar mass and would cool and crystallize faster than those.[146]
Artist's concept of white dwarf agingInternal structures of white dwarfs. To the left is a newly formed white dwarf, in the center is a cooling and crystallizing white dwarf, and the right is a black dwarf.
Once formed, a white dwarf is stable and will usually continue to cool almost indefinitely, eventually to become a black dwarf. Assuming that theuniverse continues to expand, it is thought that in 1019 to 1020 years, thegalaxies will evaporate as theirstars escape into intergalactic space.[147]: §IIIA White dwarfs should generally survive galactic dispersion, although an occasional collision between white dwarfs may produce a newfusing star (eg. anextreme helium star)[148] or a super-Chandrasekhar mass white dwarf that will explode in aType Ia supernova.[147]: §§IIIC, IV
The lifetime of a white dwarf is thought to be on the order of the hypothetical lifetime of theproton, known to be at least 1034–1035 years. Somegrand unified theories predict aproton lifetime between 1030 and 1036 years. If these theories are not valid, the proton might still decay by complicated nuclear reactions or throughquantum gravitational processes involvingvirtual black holes; in these cases, the lifetime is estimated to be no more than 10200 years. If protons do decay, the mass of a white dwarf will decrease very slowly with time as its nuclei decay, until it loses enough mass to become a non-degenerate lump of matter, and finally disappears completely.[147]: §IV
A white dwarf can also be cannibalized or evaporated by a companion star, causing the white dwarf to lose so much mass that it becomes aplanetary mass object. The resultant object, orbiting the former companion, now host star, could be ahelium planet ordiamond planet.[149][150][151]
Artist's impression of debris around a white dwarf[152]Comet falling into white dwarf (artist's impression)[153]
A white dwarf'sstellar andplanetary system is inherited from its progenitor star and may interact with the white dwarf in various ways. There are several indications that a white dwarf has a remnant planetary system.
The most common observable evidence of a remnant planetary system is pollution of the spectrum of a white dwarf withmetal absorption lines. 27–50% of white dwarfs show a spectrum polluted with metals,[154] but these heavy elements settle out in the atmosphere of white dwarfs colder than20000 K. The most widely accepted hypothesis is that this pollution comes fromtidally disrupted rocky bodies.[155][156] The first observation of a metal-polluted white dwarf was by van Maanen[17] in 1917 at theMount Wilson Observatory and is now recognized as the first evidence ofexoplanets in astronomy.[157] The white dwarfvan Maanen 2 shows iron,calcium and magnesium in its atmosphere,[158] but van Maanen misclassified it as the faintestF-type star based on the calciumH- and K-lines.[159] Thenitrogen in white dwarfs is thought to come from nitrogen-ice of extrasolarKuiper Belt objects, the lithium is thought to come from accretedcrust material and the beryllium is thought to come fromexomoons.[157]
A less common observable evidence is infrared excess due to a flat and optically thick debris disk, which is found in around 1%–4% of white dwarfs.[156] The first white dwarf with infrared excess was discovered by Zuckerman and Becklin in 1987 in the near-infrared aroundGiclas 29-38[160] and later confirmed as a debris disk.[161] White dwarfs hotter than27000 K sublimate all the dust formed by tidally disrupting a rocky body, preventing the formation of a debris disk. In colder white dwarfs, a rocky body might be tidally disrupted near theRoche radius and forced into a circular orbit by thePoynting–Robertson drag, which is stronger for less massive white dwarfs. The Poynting–Robertson drag will also cause the dust to orbit closer and closer towards the white dwarf, until it will eventually sublimate and the disk will disappear. A debris disk will have a lifetime of around a few million years for white dwarfs hotter than10000 K. Colder white dwarfs can have disk-lifetimes of a few 10 million years, which is enough time to tidally disrupt a second rocky body and forming a second disk around a white dwarf, such as the two rings aroundLSPM J0207+3331.[162]
The least common observable evidence of planetary systems are detected major or minor planets. Only a handful of giant planets and a handful of minor planets are known around white dwarfs.[163][164]
Infrared spectroscopic observations made by NASA'sSpitzer Space Telescope of the central star of theHelix Nebula suggest the presence of a dust cloud, which may be caused by cometary collisions. It is possible that infalling material from this may cause X-ray emission from the central star.[165][166] Similarly, observations made in 2004 indicated the presence of a dust cloud around the young (estimated to have formed from its AGB progenitor about 500 million years ago) white dwarfG29-38, which may have been created by tidal disruption of acomet passing close to the white dwarf.[161] Some estimations based on the metal content of the atmospheres of the white dwarfs consider that at least 15% of them may be orbited by planets orasteroids, or at least their debris.[167] Another suggested idea is that white dwarfs could be orbited by the stripped cores ofrocky planets, that would have survived the red giant phase of their star but losing their outer layers and, given those planetary remnants would likely be made ofmetals, to attempt to detect them looking for the signatures of their interaction with the white dwarf'smagnetic field.[168] Other suggested ideas of how white dwarfs are polluted with dust involve the scattering of asteroids by planets[169][170][171] or via planet-planet scattering.[172] Liberation ofexomoons from their host planet could cause white dwarf pollution with dust. Either the liberation could cause asteroids to be scattered towards the white dwarf or the exomoon could be scattered into theRoche radius of the white dwarf.[173] The mechanism behind the pollution of white dwarfs in binaries was also explored as these systems are more likely to lack a major planet, but this idea cannot explain the presence of dust around single white dwarfs.[174] While old white dwarfs show evidence of dust accretion, white dwarfs older than ~1 billion years or >7000 K with dusty infrared excess were not detected[175] until the discovery of LSPM J0207+3331 in 2018, which has a cooling age of ~3 billion years. The white dwarf shows two dusty components that are being explained with two rings with different temperatures.[156]
Another possible way to detect planetary systems around white dwarfs is through their radio emissions. In 2004 and 2005, A. J. Willes and K. Wu hypothesized that when an exoplanet travels through themagnetosphere of a white dwarf, it may generate auroral radio emissions from the magnetic poles of the white dwarf, similar to howIo stimulatesradio emissions from Jupiter. However, a search for such radio emission from nine white dwarfs by researchers using theArecibo radio telescope did not find any so far.[105]
The metal-rich white dwarfWD 1145+017 is the first white dwarf observed with a disintegrating minor planet that transits the star.[176][177] The disintegration of the planetesimal generates a debris cloud that passes in front of the star every 4.5 hours, causing a 5-minute-long fade in the star's optical brightness.[177] The depth of the transit is highly variable.[177]
The giant planetWD J0914+1914b is beingevaporated by the strong ultraviolet radiation of the hot white dwarf. Part of the evaporated material is being accreted in a gaseous disk around the white dwarf. The weakhydrogen line as well as other lines in the spectrum of the white dwarf revealed the presence of the giant planet.[178]
The white dwarfWD 0145+234 shows brightening in the mid-infrared, seen inNEOWISE data. The brightening, not seen before 2018, may be due to thetidal disruption of anexoasteroid, the first time such an event has been observed.[179]
WD 1856+534 is the first transiting major planet to be observed orbiting a white dwarf, and remains the only such example as of 2023.[180][181]MOA-2010-BLG-477L, a white dwarf discovered thanks to amicrolensing event, is also known to have a giant planet.[182][164]
GD 140 andLAWD 37 are suspected to have giant exoplanets due to anomaly in theHipparcos-Gaia proper motion. For GD 140 it is suspected to be a planet several times more massive than Jupiter and for LAWD 37 it is suspected to be a planet less massive than Jupiter.[183][184] Additionally, WD 0141-675 was suspected to have a super-Jupiter with an orbital period of 33.65 days based on Gaia astrometry. This is remarkable because WD 0141-675 is polluted with metals and metal polluted white dwarfs have long been suspected to host giant planets that disturb the orbits of minor planets, causing the pollution.[185] Both GD 140 and WD 0141 will be observed withJWST in cycle 2 with the aim to detect infrared excess caused by the planets.[186] However, the planet candidate at WD 0141-675 was found to be a false positive caused by a software error.[187]
A search has been proposed fortransits of hypothetical Earth-like planets around white dwarfs with surface temperatures of less than10000 K. Such stars that could harbor ahabitable zone at a distance ofc. 0.005 to 0.02 AU that would last upwards of 3 billion years. This is so close that any habitable planets would betidally locked. As a white dwarf has a size similar to that of a planet, these kinds of transits would produce strongeclipses.[188]
Newer research casts some doubts on this idea, given that the close orbits of those hypothetical planets around their parent stars would subject them to strongtidal forces that could render them uninhabitable by triggering agreenhouse effect.[189] Another suggested constraint to this idea is the origin of those planets. Leaving aside formation from theaccretion disk surrounding the white dwarf, there are two ways a planet could end in a close orbit around stars of this kind: by surviving being engulfed by the star during its red giant phase, and then spiralling inward, or inward migration after the white dwarf has formed. The former case is implausible for low-mass bodies, as they are unlikely to survive being absorbed by their stars. In the latter case, the planets would have to expel so much orbital energy as heat, through tidal interactions with the white dwarf, that they would likely end as uninhabitable embers.[190]
The merger process of two co-orbiting white dwarfs producesgravitational waves
If a white dwarf is in a binary star system and is accreting matter from its companion, a variety of phenomena may occur, includingnovae and Type Ia supernovae. It may also be asuper-soft x-ray source if it is able to take material from its companion fast enough to sustain fusion on its surface.[191] On the other hand, phenomena in binary systems such as tidal interaction and star–disc interaction, moderated by magnetic fields or not, act on the rotation of accreting white dwarfs. In fact, the (securely known) fastest-spinning white dwarfs are members of binary systems (the fastest one being the white dwarf in CTCV J2056-3014).[192] A close binary system of two white dwarfs can lose angular momentum and radiate energy in the form ofgravitational waves, causing their mutual orbit to steadily shrink until the stars merge.[193][194]
The mass of an isolated, nonrotating white dwarf cannot exceed the Chandrasekhar limit of ~ 1.4 M☉. This limit may increase if the white dwarf is rotating rapidly and nonuniformly.[195] White dwarfs inbinary systems can accrete material from a companion star, increasing both their mass and their density. As their mass approaches the Chandrasekhar limit, this could theoretically lead to either the explosive ignition offusion in the white dwarf or its collapse into a neutron star.[49]
There are two models that might explain the progenitor systems ofType Ia supernovae: thesingle-degenerate model and thedouble-degenerate model. In thesingle-degenerate model, a carbon–oxygen white dwarf accretes mass and compresses its core by pulling mass from a companion non-degenerate star.[196]: 14 It is believed thatcompressional heating of the core leads toignition ofcarbon fusion as the mass approaches the Chandrasekhar limit.[196] Because the white dwarf is supported against gravity by quantum degeneracy pressure instead of by thermal pressure, adding heat to the star's interior increases its temperature but not its pressure, so the white dwarf does not expand and cool in response. Rather, the increased temperature accelerates the rate of the fusion reaction, in arunaway process that feeds on itself. Thethermonuclear flame consumes much of the white dwarf in a few seconds, causing a Type Ia supernova explosion that obliterates the star.[1][196][197] In another possible mechanism for Type Ia supernovae, thedouble-degenerate model, two carbon–oxygen white dwarfs in a binary system merge, creating an object with mass greater than theChandrasekhar limit in which carbon fusion is then ignited.[196]: 14 In both cases, the white dwarfs are not expected to survive the Type Ia supernova.[198]
Thesingle-degenerate model was the favored mechanism for Type Ia supernovae, but now, because of observations, thedouble-degenerate model is thought to be the more likely scenario. Predicted rates of white dwarf-white dwarf mergers are comparable to the rate of Type Ia supernovae and would explain the lack of hydrogen in the spectra of Type Ia supernovae.[199] However, the main mechanism for Type Ia supernovae remains an open question.[200] In the single-degenerate scenario, the accretion rate onto the white dwarf needs to be within a narrow range dependent on its mass so that the hydrogen burning on the surface of the white dwarf is stable. If the accretion rate is too low, novae on the surface of the white dwarf will blow away accreted material. If it is too high, the white dwarf will expand and the white dwarf and companion star will be in a common envelope. This stops the growth of the white dwarf thus preventing it from reaching the Chandrasekhar limit and exploding.[199] For the single-degenerate model its companion is expected to survive, but there is no strong evidence of such a star near Type Ia supernovae sites.[198] In the double-degenerate scenario, white dwarfs need to be in very close binaries; otherwise their inspiral time is longer than theage of the universe. It is also likely that instead of a Type Ia supernova, the merger of two white dwarfs will lead to core-collapse. As a white dwarf accretes material quickly, the core can ignite off-center, which leads to gravitational instabilities that could create aneutron star.[198]
The historical brightSN 1006 is thought to have been a Type Ia supernova from a white dwarf, possibly the merger of two white dwarfs.[201]Tycho's Supernova of 1572 was also a type Ia supernova, and its remnant has been detected.[202]WD 0810–353, a white dwarf 11 parsecs away from the Sun, is possibly ahypervelocity runaway ejected from a Type Ia supernova, though this has been disputed.[203][204]
A post-common envelope binary (PCEB) is a binary consisting of a white dwarf orhot subdwarf and a closely tidally-locked red dwarf (in other cases this might be abrown dwarf instead of a red dwarf).[205] These binaries form when the red dwarf is engulfed in thered giant phase. As the red dwarf orbits inside thecommon envelope, it is slowed down in the denser environment. This slowed orbital speed is compensated with a decrease of the orbital distance between the red dwarf and the core of the red giant. The red dwarf spirals inwards towards the core and might merge with the core. If this does not happen and instead the common envelope is ejected, then the binary ends up in a close orbit, consisting of a white dwarf and a red dwarf. This type of binary is called a post-common envelope binary. The evolution of the PCEB continues as the two dwarf stars orbit closer and closer due tomagnetic braking and by releasing gravitational waves. The binary might then evolve into one of several dramatic outcomes: a high-field magnetic white dwarf, a white dwarf pulsar, a double-degenerate binary, or even a Type Ia supernova.[206][207] Because a PCEB may evolve at some point into acataclysmic variable, some of them are also called pre-cataclysmic variables.[208][185]
Before accretion of material pushes a white dwarf close to the Chandrasekhar limit, accreted hydrogen-rich material on the surface may ignite in a less destructive type of thermonuclear explosion powered byhydrogen fusion. These surface explosions can be repeated as long as the white dwarf's core remains intact. This weaker kind of repetitive cataclysmic phenomenon is called a (classical) nova. Astronomers have also observeddwarf novae, which have smaller, more frequent luminosity peaks than the classical novae. These are thought to be caused by the release ofgravitational potential energy when part of theaccretion disc collapses onto the star, rather than through a release of energy due to fusion. In general, binary systems with a white dwarf accreting matter from a stellar companion are calledcataclysmic variables. As well as novae and dwarf novae, several other classes of these variables are known, includingpolars andintermediate polars, both of which feature highly magnetic white dwarfs.[1][196][209][210] Both fusion- and accretion-powered cataclysmic variables have been observed to be X-ray sources.[210]
Other binaries include those that consist of amain sequence star (or giant) and a white dwarf. The binary Sirius AB is an example pair of this type.[211] White dwarfs can also exist as binaries or multiple star systems that only consist of white dwarfs. An example of a resolved triple white dwarf system isWD J1953−1019, discovered withGaia DR2 data.[212] One interesting field is the study ofremnant planetary systems around white dwarfs. It is expected that planets orbiting severalAU from a star will survive the star's post-main-sequence transformation into a white dwarf. Moreover, white dwarfs, being much smaller and correspondingly less luminous than their progenitors, are less likely to outshine any bodies in orbit around them. This makes white dwarfs advantageous targets for direct-imaging searches forexoplanets andbrown dwarfs. The first brown dwarf to be detected by direct imaging was the companion to the white dwarfGD 165 A, discovered in 1988.[213] More recently, the white dwarfWD 0806−661 was found to have a cold companion body of substellar mass, variously described as a brown dwarf[214][215] or an exoplanet.[216]
^abWerner, K.; Hammer, N.J.; Nagel, T.; Rauch, T.; Dreizler, S. (2005).On possible oxygen / neon white dwarfs: H1504+65 and the white dwarf donors in ultracompact X-ray binaries. 14th European Workshop on White Dwarfs. Vol. 334. p. 165.arXiv:astro-ph/0410690.Bibcode:2005ASPC..334..165W.
^Althaus, L. G.; Benvenuto, O. G. (March 1997). "Evolution of Helium White Dwarfs of Low and Intermediate Masses".The Astrophysical Journal.477 (1):313–334.Bibcode:1997ApJ...477..313A.doi:10.1086/303686.
^abEisenstein, Daniel J.; Liebert, James; Harris, Hugh C.; Kleinman, S. J.; Nitta, Atsuko; Silvestri, Nicole; et al. (2006). "A catalog of spectroscopically confirmed white dwarfs from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, data release 4".The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.167 (1):40–58.arXiv:astro-ph/0606700.Bibcode:2006ApJS..167...40E.doi:10.1086/507110.S2CID13829139.
^Trefil, J. S. (2004).The Moment of Creation: Big Bang Physics from Before the First Millisecond to the Present Universe.Dover Publications.ISBN978-0-486-43813-9.
^Barrat, J. L.; Hansen, J. P.; Mochkovitch, R. (1988). "Crystallization of carbon-oxygen mixtures in white dwarfs".Astronomy and Astrophysics.199 (1–2): L15.Bibcode:1988A&A...199L..15B.
^Kanaan, A.; Nitta, A.; Winget, D. E.; Kepler, S. O.; Montgomery, M. H.; Metcalfe, T. S.; et al. (2005). "Whole Earth Telescope observations of BPM 37093: A seismological test of crystallization theory in white dwarfs".Astronomy and Astrophysics.432 (1):219–224.arXiv:astro-ph/0411199.Bibcode:2005A&A...432..219K.doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20041125.S2CID7297628.
^Lovell, B. (1975). "Patrick Maynard Stuart Blackett, Baron Blackett, of Chelsea. 18 November 1897 – 13 July 1974".Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society.21:1–115.doi:10.1098/rsbm.1975.0001.JSTOR769678.S2CID74674634.
^"ZZ Ceti variables".Centre deDonnées astronomiques de Strasbourg. Association Française des Observateurs d'Etoiles Variables. Archived fromthe original on 5 February 2007. Retrieved6 June 2007.
^Lawrence, G. M.; Ostriker, J. P.; Hesser, J. E. (1967). "Ultrashort-Period Stellar Oscillations. I. Results from White Dwarfs, Old Novae, Central Stars of Planetary Nebulae, 3c 273, and Scorpius XR-1".The Astrophysical Journal.148: L161.Bibcode:1967ApJ...148L.161L.doi:10.1086/180037.
^Nelemans, G.; Tauris, T. M. (1998). "Formation of undermassive single white dwarfs and the influence of planets on late stellar evolution".Astronomy and Astrophysics.335: L85.arXiv:astro-ph/9806011.Bibcode:1998A&A...335L..85N.
^Jordan, George C. IV.; Perets, Hagai B.; Fisher, Robert T.; van Rossum, Daniel R. (2012). "Failed-detonation Supernovae: Subluminous Low-velocity Ia Supernovae and their Kicked Remnant White Dwarfs with Iron-rich Cores".The Astrophysical Journal Letters.761 (2): L23.arXiv:1208.5069.Bibcode:2012ApJ...761L..23J.doi:10.1088/2041-8205/761/2/L23.S2CID119203015.
^Zuckerman, B. (1 June 2015).Recognition of the First Observational Evidence of an Extrasolar Planetary System. 19Th European Workshop on White Dwarfs. Vol. 493. p. 291.Bibcode:2015ASPC..493..291Z.
^Su, K. Y. L.; Chu, Y.-H.; Rieke, G. H.; Huggins, P. J.; Gruendl, R.; Napiwotzki, R.; Rauch, T.; Latter, W. B.; Volk, K. (2007). "A Debris Disk around the Central Star of the Helix Nebula?".The Astrophysical Journal.657 (1): L41.arXiv:astro-ph/0702296.Bibcode:2007ApJ...657L..41S.doi:10.1086/513018.S2CID15244406.
^abcVanderburg, Andrew; Johnson, John Asher; Rappaport, Saul; Bieryla, Allyson; Irwin, Jonathan; Lewis, John Arban; Kipping, David; Brown, Warren R.; Dufour, Patrick (22 October 2015). "A disintegrating minor planet transiting a white dwarf".Nature.526 (7574):546–549.arXiv:1510.06387.Bibcode:2015Natur.526..546V.doi:10.1038/nature15527.PMID26490620.S2CID4451207.
^Gänsicke, Boris T.; Schreiber, Matthias R.; Toloza, Odette; Gentile Fusillo, Nicola P.; Koester, Detlev; Manser, Christopher J."Accretion of a giant planet onto a white dwarf"(PDF).ESO.Archived(PDF) from the original on 4 December 2019. Retrieved11 December 2019.
^Blackman, J. W.; Beaulieu, J. P.; Bennett, D. P.; Danielski, C.; Alard, C.; Cole, A. A.; Vandorou, A.; Ranc, C.; Terry, S. K.; Bhattacharya, A.; Bond, I.; Bachelet, E.; Veras, D.; Koshimoto, N.; Batista, V.; Marquette, J. B. (2021). "A Jovian analogue orbiting a white dwarf star".Nature.598 (7880):272–275.arXiv:2110.07934.Bibcode:2021Natur.598..272B.doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03869-6.PMID34646001.
^"Gaia DR3 known issues".ESA. 5 May 2023. Retrieved8 August 2023.During validation of epoch astrometry for Gaia DR4, an error was discovered, that had already had an impact on the Gaia DR3 non-single star results. [...] We can conclude that the solutions for [...] WD 0141-675 [...] are false-positives as far as Gaia non-single star processing is concerned.
^Aguilar, David A.; Pulliam, Christine (13 July 2011)."Evolved Stars Locked in Fatalistic Dance". Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.Archived from the original on 15 July 2011. Retrieved17 July 2011.
Shapiro, Stuart L.; Teukolsky, Saul A. (2004).Black Holes, White Dwarfs and Neutron Stars: the physics of compact objects. Physics textbook. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.ISBN978-3-527-41450-5.
.jpg)
