| Megalania | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Megalania skeletal reconstruction onMelbourne Museum steps | |
Scientific classification | |
| Domain: | Eukaryota |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Chordata |
| Class: | Reptilia |
| Order: | Squamata |
| Family: | Varanidae |
| Genus: | Varanus |
| Species: | †V. priscus |
| Binomial name | |
| †Varanus priscus | |
| Synonyms | |
| |
Megalania (Varanus priscus) is anextinct species of giantmonitor lizard,[1] part of themegafaunal assemblage that inhabitedAustralia during thePleistocene. It is the largest terrestrial lizard known to have existed, but the fragmentary nature of known remains make estimates highly uncertain. Recent studies suggest that most known specimens would have reached around 2–3 m (6.6–9.8 ft) in body length excluding the tail, while some individuals would have been significantly larger, reaching sizes around 4.5–7 m (15–23 ft) in length.
Megalania is thought to have had a similar ecology to the livingKomodo dragon (Varanus komodoensis) which may be its closest living relative.[2] The youngest fossil remains of giant monitor lizards in Australia date to around 50,000 years ago.[3] The first indigenous settlers of Australia might have encountered megalania,[4] and been a factor in megalania's extinction.[5][3][6] While originally megalania was considered to be the only member of the titular genus "Megalania", today it is considered a member of the genusVaranus, being closely related to other Australian monitor lizards.
SirRichard Owen described the first known remains of megalania in 1859, from three vertebrae amongst a collection of primarily marsupial bones purchased by the British Museum, collected from the bed of a tributary of theCondamine River, west ofMoreton Bay in eastern Australia. The name "Megalania prisca" was coined in the paper by Owen to mean "ancient great roamer"; the name was chosen "in reference to the terrestrial nature of the great Saurian".[1] Owen used a modification of the Greek word ἠλαίνωēlainō ("I roam"). The close similarity to the Latin word:lania (feminine form of "butcher") has resulted in numerous taxonomic and popular descriptions of "Megalania" mistranslating the name as "ancient giant butcher." "Megalania" is no longer considered a valid genus, with many authors preferring to consider it ajunior synonym ofVaranus,[7][8] which encompasses all living monitor lizards. The genera "Megalania" andVaranus are respectively feminine and masculine ingrammatical gender and their specific names need to match them:prisca (feminine) andpriscus (masculine).[9]
Megalania is included withinVaranus because its morphology suggests that it is more closely related to some species ofVaranus than others, so excludingV. priscus fromVaranus renders the latter genus anunnatural grouping. Ralph Molnar noted in 2004 that, even if every species of the genusVaranus were divided into groups currently designated as subgenera,V. priscus would still be classified in the genusVaranus, because this is the current subgenus name, as well as genus name, for all Australian monitors. Unless other Australian monitor species were each also classified their own exclusive genera, "Megalania" would not be a valid genus name. However, Molnar noted that "megalania" is suitable for use as avernacular, rather than scientific name, for the speciesVaranus priscus.[9]
Several studies have attempted to establish thephylogenetic position of megalania within theVaranidae. An affinity with theperentie (Varanus giganteus), Australia's largest living lizard, has been suggested based on skull-roof morphology.[10] The most recent comprehensive study[2] proposes a sister-taxon relationship with the largeKomodo dragon (Varanus komodoensis) based on neurocranial similarities, with thelace monitor (Varanus varius) as the closest living Australian relative. Conversely, the perentie is considered more closely related toGould's monitor and theArgus monitor.
The lack of complete or nearly complete fossil skeletons has made it difficult to determine the exact dimensions of megalania.[8] Early estimates placed the length of the largest individuals at 7 m (23 ft), with a maximum weight of approximately 600–620 kg (1,320–1,370 lb).[11] In 2002, Stephen Wroe considerably downsized megalania, suggesting a maximum total length of 4.5 m (15 ft) and a weight of 331 kg (730 lb) with average total lengths of 3.45 m (11.3 ft) and 97–158 kg (214–348 lb),[12] decrying the earlier maximum length estimate of 7 m (23 ft) as exaggerations based on flawed methods. In 2009, however, Wroe joined other researchers in raising the estimate to at least 5.5 m (18 ft) and 575 kg (1,268 lb).[13]
In 2003, Erickson and colleagues suggested that a large specimen with an estimated longevity of 16 years, QM F4452/3, would have belonged to an individual up to 2.19 m (7.2 ft) insnout-vent length based onfemoral length.[14] In a book published in 2004, Ralph Molnar determined a range of potential sizes for megalania, made by scaling up from dorsal vertebrae, after he determined a relationship between dorsal vertebrae width and snout-vent length. The averagesnout-vent length of known specimens were around 2.2–2.4 m (7.2–7.9 ft), and such individuals would have weighed up to 320 kg (710 lb). The largest vertebra (QM 2942) would have belonged to an individual with a snout-vent length of 3.8 m (12 ft) and weighed up to 1,940 kg (4,280 lb).[8]
In 2012, Conrad and colleagues estimated the size of megalania based on comparing two known specimens with all known species ofVaranus. The authors of the study suggested that the braincase (BMNH 39965) likely belonged to an individual around 1.78–1.9 m (5.8–6.2 ft) in precaudal length, while the largest specimen available to them (AMNH FR 6304) suggested that this individual would have reached up to 2–2.17 m (6.6–7.1 ft) in precaudal length. They also noted that it is possible for megalania to reach over 3 m (9.8 ft) in precaudal length, given that the largest specimens of modern varanid species are larger than average individuals by 151 to 225 percent.[15]
Megalania is the largest terrestrial lizard known to have existed. Judging from its size, it would have fed mostly upon medium- to large-sized animals, including any of the giant marsupials such asDiprotodon, along with other reptiles and small mammals, as well as birds and their eggs and chicks.[citation needed] It had heavily built limbs and body, a large skull complete with a small crest between the eyes, and a jaw full of serrated, blade-like teeth.[9]
Some scientists regard with skepticism the contention that megalania was the only, or even principal, predator of the Australian Pleistocene megafauna.[16] They note that themarsupial lion (Thylacoleo carnifex) has been implicated with the butchery of very large Pleistocene mammals, while megalania has not.[citation needed] In addition, they note that megalania fossils are extremely uncommon, in contrast toT. carnifex's wide distribution across Australian Pleistocene deposits.Quinkana, a genus of terrestrial crocodiles that grew up to 6 m and was present until around 40,000 years ago, has also been marked as anotherapex predator of Australian megafauna.
Komodo dragons, megalania's closest relative, are known to have evolved in Australia before spreading to their current range in Indonesia, as fossil evidence fromQueensland has implied.[17][18] If one were to reconstruct the ecosystems that existed before the arrival of the humans on Australia,reintroducing Komodo dragons as anecological proxy of megalania to the continent has been suggested.[19]
A study published in 2009 using Wroe's earlier size estimates and an analysis of 18 closely related lizard species estimated a sprinting speed of 2.6–3 m/s (9.4–10.8 km/h). This speed is comparable to that of theextantfreshwater crocodile (Crocodylus johnstoni).[20]
The scales of megalania would possibly be similar to those of their extant relatives, possessing a honeycomb microstructure and both durable and resilient to water evaporation.[21]
Along with othervaranid lizards, such as the Komodo dragon and theNile monitor, megalania belongs to the proposed cladeToxicofera, which contains all known reptileclades possessing toxin-secreting oral glands, as well as their close venomous and nonvenomous relatives, includingIguania,Anguimorpha, andsnakes.[22][23][24] Closely related varanids use a potentvenom found in glands inside the jaw. The venom in these lizards have been shown to be ahaemotoxin. The venom would act as ananticoagulant and would greatly increase the bleeding the prey received from its wounds. This would rapidly decrease the prey's blood pressure and lead tosystemic shock. Being a member of Anguimorpha, megalania may have been venomous and if so, would be the largest venomous vertebrate known.[13]
The youngest remains of the species date to theLate Pleistocene, with the youngest remains possibly referrable to the species being a largeosteoderm dating to approximately 50,000 years ago from theMount Etna Caves National Park in central-easternQueensland.[3] A study examined the morphology of nine closely related extant varanid lizards and thenallometrically scaled and compared them toV. priscus, found that the musculature of the limbs, posture, muscular mass, and possible muscular composition of the animal would most likely have been inefficient when attempting to outrun the early human settlers who colonised Australia during that time.[5] Considering many other species of Australian megafauna went extinct around the same time, either due to human predation or being outcompeted by them, the same can be assumed for megalania.
Confrontations between megalania and earlyAboriginal Australians may have inspired tales of fearsome creatures such as thewhowie.[8]
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
