User talk:Real4jyy
Page contents not supported in other languages.
Hello, Real4jyy!Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you foryour contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on yourtalk page and ask your question there. Please remember tosign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining aWikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Clickhere for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in theedit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!Peaceray (talk)16:05, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply] |
|---|
|
|
Peaceray (talk)16:05, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Could you explain why you are spamming the annual readership template into articles? That info is available on a history tab, and is not needed on talk pages, and adds talk page clutter.SandyGeorgia (Talk)12:28, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Real4jyy! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such astypo corrections or reverting obviousvandalism. Any edit that changes themeaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please seeHelp:Minor edit for more information. None of these three edits were minor:[1][2][3]. See alsoWP:Copying within Wikipedia.TompaDompa (talk)16:13, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome Real4jyy!I'mSm8900, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
| Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Somecommon sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
| If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message atmy talk page or type{{Help me}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you cancontribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
To get some practice editing you canuse a sandbox. You cancreate your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put{{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply clickhere to start it.
Please remember to:
button on theedit toolbar or by typing fourtildes
~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert yoursignature, a link to your talk page, and atimestamp.Sincerely,Sm8900 (talk) (Leave me a message)21:14, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sm8900 (talk)21:14, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I notice that you've been adding{{talk header}} to talk pagesen masse, even pages with no discussions. This goes against the template's own documentation:
This template should be placed in accordance withtalk page guidelines. This template does not need to be placed on every talk page, and should not be indiscriminately added to talk pages using automated editing tools. Talk pages that are frequently misused, that attract frequent debate, articles often subject to controversy, articles that typically attract new editors, and highly-visible or popular topics may be appropriate for this template.
— Template:Tph § Unnecessary
I don't think you're violating any rules, as long as your edits were manual, and I'm sure this was ingood faith. If you think the header would be useful on more pages than the documentation describes, we couldtalk about it onTemplate talk:Talk header.jlwoodwa (talk)23:16, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Real4jyy, I noticed you've added a few Very long tags to some articles. I was wondering how you are determining the length for this, are you looking at prose length, visual article length, or something else? Thanks,CMD (talk)07:57, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Real4jyy, it's a shame that @CMD and @Sanglahi86, who actually care, have to go through this regarding someone who doesn't seem to give a ****. I think I'll revert the rest of those edits and maybe you can answer the questions that were asked of you.Bringingthewood (talk)23:04, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Portals belong in §See also, unless the page lacks such a section. That's both the standard convention – as evidenced by their placement there across numerous Good and Featured articles – and as explained inWP:SEEALSO, which states the sections purpose is to sponge up internal links. Please stop converting regular portal templates into portal bar, then shuffling them away from view at the bottom of pages – Portals are not navboxen. Happy Trails! -- dsprc [talk]14:33, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, can you run the Internet Archive bot on this page :Starlink in the Russo-Ukrainian War. I wish I could do it, but I have an issue with using the bot that I never managed to solve because my help request has remained unanswered for over a month.
thanksCodemWiki (talk)17:06, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mSohom Datta. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added toDOM clobbering have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message onmy talk page, or take a look at ourguidelines about links. Thank you.Sohom (talk)19:02, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
I undid a few of your ref archiving edits because your way of formatting refs (i.e. you put |first1 = and |last1 = on separate lines instead of together in one) expands the reference source code way too much, which makes the references section very cumbersome to comb through in the source editor. So I'm asking you to edit the reference source code according to how they are already formatted, instead of expanding them. And by the way, I also reverted your "fixed layout" edit to152830 Dinkinesh because they create too much empty white space in between sections and the fixed image sizes aren't friendly to small-screen users. Thanks,Nrco0e (talk)22:33, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your contributions toList of exoplanets discovered in 2024. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time becauseit has no sources.I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information atHelp:Unreviewed new page.When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.Significa liberdade(she/her) (talk)05:46, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed onCategory:Exoplanets discovered in 2024 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag.LizRead!Talk!06:50, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
RegardingWikipedia:Good article reassessment/Towson United Methodist Church/1, I asked for clarification about the concerns mentioned in the GAR nom, with an eye towards fixing small stuff if there were only small items to fix. And was met with three weeks of silence, now followed by delisting with still no further comment. That seems like a broken process if nobody is willing to be specific about the concern. What is the basis for deciding how/if to fix it to the satisfaction of whoever raises the concern?DMacks (talk)22:02, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not quite sure why you delistedWikipedia:Good article reassessment/Northallerton/1. As is very clear from the article history, cleanup work has been ongoing for a number of weeks. Please reopen the reassessment ASAP, and try to look at article histories before closing GARs.~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk)16:17, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You prematurely delisted the main article of Florida State University from GA status, which the article has had for years. I have reverted your delist and am requesting assistance from other editors to work the process properly. Your abrupt action without soliciting cooperation and collaboration in correcting and discussing the work is not helpful.Sirberus (talk)15:03, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I see you've contributed a lot toBigfoot, would you be interested in joining ataskforce on oral tradition?Kowal2701 (talk)09:44, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
When closing a GAR, it is conventional to ping anyone who has said they intend to work on it, not delist it suddenly.Matarisvan, would you like the GAR reopened?
As an aside, this is now the fourth complaint on GAR closing from this year alone (see above). You need to take more care to act with full consideration when closing. Please acknowledge you have seen this comment.~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk)11:16, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Real ! Hope this message finds you well. Can you please exlain why you remove GAN nomination template fromRajesh Hamal?Fade258 (talk)08:48, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]